Are you looking for a smartphone that provides excellent value without compromising features? The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Series could be the perfect choice for you. This new lineup promises impressive performance, vibrant displays, and long battery life, all at an affordable price. Whether a casual user or a tech enthusiast, the Redmi Note 13 Series is designed to meet your unique needs. Find out which smartphone suits you best and enjoy the power and versatility of Xiaomi's latest offerings. Comprehensive Battery Insights: Why Choose the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Series In a highly competitive smartphone market in 2024, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Series stands out with its exceptional battery performance. This series is designed to provide long-lasting power, ensuring your smartphone keeps up with your daily activities. Whether you're a heavy user or someone who values reliability, the Redmi Note 13 Series offers impressive battery life, fast charging capabilities, and energy-efficient hardware. Introduction to Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Series Battery Performance Analysis This analysis focuses on the battery performance of each smartphone, highlighting their impressive battery life and efficiency. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G leads with exceptional battery life, while the Redmi Note 13 Pro , the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ , and Redmi Note 13 5G smartphones also demonstrate strong performance. These insights showcase Xiaomi's dedication to optimising battery life and providing reliable smartphones that meet user needs. Graphs have been prepared to illustrate the battery performance of the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 series, focusing on five key metrics: battery life, charging time, annual energy consumption, and power efficiency. These insights are based on rigorous testing by SmartViser, with ViserMark Labels serving as an authoritative guide on battery performance. Let's begin our analysis of the test results by looking at the first key metric: Battery Performance (Graph 1) Shown in Graph 1 is a comprehensive view of how each Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 series smartphone scores in terms of battery performance compared to the Mid Tier (€200-€499) average. The Mid Tier average battery performance score is 45 out of 100. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G scores slightly below the average at 44, the Note 13 Pro 5G at 42, and the Note 13 5G at 43. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G outperforms the other smartphones and the Mid Tier average, scoring 48. This score reflects various factors, including battery life charging time, and energy efficiency, providing a holistic view of battery performance for potential users seeking a reliable and long-lasting smartphone. Battery Life (Graph 2 & 3) Now, we take a more detailed look at how long each smartphone in the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 series can last on a single charge under typical usage conditions. This is crucial for users who need a phone that can reliably last through their daily routines without frequent recharges. Graph 2 shows the average battery life in days for each smartphone, compared to the Mid Tier average of 1.82 days. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G, Note 13 Pro 5G, and Note 13 5G each achieve an average battery life of 1.5 days. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G impressively exceeds this with a battery life of 2 days, outperforming both its series counterparts and the Mid Tier average. This superior performance makes it a standout choice for users prioritising battery longevity in their smartphone selection. The next metric provides a more granular analysis of the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 battery performance. It provides a detailed view of how long each smartphone can sustain continuous use, giving a clearer picture of day-to-day usability. In Graph 3, the Mid Tier average battery life is 46 hours. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G and Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G achieve an average of 36 hours, while the Note 13 5G lasts slightly longer at 39 hours. Remarkably, the Note 13 4G surpasses all with 51 hours of use, significantly outperforming the Mid Tier average and others. This extended battery life in hours highlights the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G as an excellent option for users needing prolonged usage without frequent charging, making it ideal for heavy daily use and long-duration activities. Battery Charging Times (Graph 4) Exploring the fourth key metric, charging times is essential for understanding how quickly each Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 series can be recharged. Fast charging is a crucial feature for users who need their smartphones ready for use quickly. This metric is particularly significant given Xiaomi's unique selling proposition (USP) is its fast charging capability. In Graph 4 , the mid-tier average charging time is 1.42 hours. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G impressively charges the fastest, taking only 32 minutes. The Xiaomi Note 13 Pro 5G follows with a charging time of 53 minutes. The Note 13 5G and Note 13 4G have longer charging times of 1.23 and 1.13 hours, respectively, but still fall below the Mid Tier average. These results highlight the exceptional fast-charging capabilities of Note 13 Pro+ 5G and Note 13 Pro 5G, making them ideal for users who prioritise minimal downtime and need their phones ready to go quickly. Xiaomi's emphasis on fast charging sets these phones apart, ensuring users can rely on their phones to recharge rapidly and efficiently. Battery Efficiency (Graph 5) Next, let's examine the fifth key metric, battery efficiency which provides insight into how effectively each Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 series smartphone utilises its battery power. Battery efficiency is crucial for users who want their phones to last longer and operate more sustainably over time In Graph 5 , we can see that the mid-tier average power efficiency score is 1.06 leaves. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G and Note 13 Pro 5G have a score of 0.5 leaves, indicating slightly lower efficiency in their power usage to the average. However, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G and Note 13 4G, with their higher score of 1 leaf, show commendable performance, closely aligning with the Mid Tier average and reassuring users about their power usage. Annual Energy Consumption (Graph 6) Look at the sixth key metric, Annual Energy Consumption. This metric measures the energy consumed by each phone in the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 series over a year. It is essential for environmentally conscious users as it provides insight into the device's energy efficiency and potential environmental impact. In Graph 6 , the Mid Tier's average annual energy consumption is 3.62 kWh. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G and Note 13 Pro 5G consume the most energy, with values of 4.5 and 4.6 kWh, respectively. The Note 13 5G has a slightly lower consumption at 4.2 kWh. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G excels with the lowest annual energy consumption of 3.2 kWh, significantly below the Mid Tier average. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G's low energy consumption offers significant environmental benefits, making it an ideal choice for users prioritising sustainability. Despite its impressive battery life and efficient power usage, it maintains a lower energy footprint over the year, perfectly aligning with eco-conscious values. For users looking to minimise their energy usage without sacrificing performance, the Note 13 4G offers a compelling and responsible solution. Advanced Battery Analysis: Discovering the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Series Using SmartViser's viSer  with VWS Analytics Studio's advanced analytical capabilities, we've thoroughly examined the battery consumption patterns of the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Series. This analysis highlights the battery performance of each phone in the series and if you go to our website, you can learn more about how we test smartphones . The graph shown below provides a comprehensive view of the battery consumption patterns of the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 series, featuring the Pro+, Pro, 5G, and 4G smartphones, in comparison to the average Mid Tier smartphone. It specifically highlights the current consumption in daily user activities such as social media, gaming, and web browsing. This detailed comparison helps you understand the efficiency and performance of each phone in scenarios that match your usage, showcasing Xiaomi's advancements in battery optimisation and energy efficiency. Be the first to know about new reviews, updates, news and events. Detailed Battery Consumption Performance: Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G is an excellent option for individuals seeking a dependable and affordable smartphone. It features a 5000mAh battery with a ViserMark Battery Performance Score of 48/100, delivering up to 51 hours of battery life. The charging time for this smartphone is just 1 hour and 13 minutes. It is perfect for casual tasks such as social media, web browsing, media consumption, and light gaming, making it especially suitable for casual users, students, and anyone needed a dependable phone. Battery Life for Daily Use: In daily usage scenarios, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G stands out with its exceptional battery life, making it perfect for extended use without frequent recharges. Compared to the 5G models, it is more efficient in tasks, like SMS, email, and media playback, offering longer usage times. While it lacks the speed of 5G connectivity, its overall performance and energy efficiency make it a strong contender for users prioritising longevity and simplicity. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G is designed to enhance connectivity and speed for faster internet access. It comes with a 5000mAh battery, achieving a ViserMark Battery Performance Score of 43/100 and providing up to 39 hours of use. It can be fully charged in 1 hour and 23 minutes. This phone is well-suited for social media, video streaming, and multitasking with 5G speeds, making it an ideal choice for frequent travellers and multitaskers. Battery Life for Daily Use: The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G effectively balances power efficiency and performance, offering reliable battery life with the added advantage of 5G speeds. It is particularly effective for tasks such as web browsing and social media. Although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G falls slightly behind the 4G phone in terms of total battery life, it offers a significant improvement for users who need faster internet for activities like downloading and uploading. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G is a mid-range powerhouse designed for users who demand more. It features a slightly larger 5100mAh battery, a ViserMark Battery Performance Score of 42/100, and offers up to 36 hours of use. Charging takes only 53 minutes. This smartphone excels in gaming, video streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking, making it perfect for power users and gamers needing robust performance. Battery Life for Daily Use: The Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G is tailored for heavy-duty tasks, providing enhanced battery capacity for extended gaming and media consumption. While its battery performance score is slightly lower than the 4G model, it compensates with superior performance in demanding applications. Compared to the base 5G phone, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G offers better support for multitasking and power-intensive activities, making it a solid choice for power users. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G The flagship smartphone, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G, offers top-tier features and performance. With a 5000mAh battery, it achieves a ViserMark Battery Performance Score of 44/100 and provides up to 36 hours of use, with an impressive charging time of just 32 minutes. This phone is ideal for high-end gaming, professional use, content creation, and multitasking. It suits tech enthusiasts and professionals requiring top-tier performance and features. Battery Life for Daily Use: The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G stands out with its balanced battery performance and quick charging time. It is the most efficient smartphone regarding power usage, making it ideal for professional and high-demand applications. While its battery life is the same as the Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G phone, its superior energy efficiency and quicker charging provide an edge for users needing reliable, fast power charging. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G is well-suited for intensive tasks such as high-end gaming and professional content creation, offering a good experience in the Redmi Note 13 series. Technological Advancements in the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Series The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 series incorporates cutting-edge technological advancements to enhance the user experience. Here are the key highlights: Battery Optimisation:  Enhanced power management algorithms ensure prolonged battery life. For example, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G optimises power usage during heavy multitasking, maintaining efficiency and performance. 5G Connectivity:  Improved network speeds in 5G smartphones significantly enhance streaming and online gaming experiences, making the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G ideal for high-speed internet users who demand seamless connectivity. Fast Charging Technology:  Advanced solutions reduce charging time, with the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G recharging in just 32 minutes, ensuring minimal downtime and maximum usage. Energy Efficiency:  Enhanced hardware and software designs lower energy consumption, highlighted by the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4G’s industry-leading power efficiency of 3.2 kWh/year, making it an environmentally friendly choice. Enhanced Performance:  Upgraded processors and RAM in Pro models support demanding applications and multitasking, ensuring smooth and responsive performance even under heavy use. AI Integration:  Advanced AI features to improve battery usage, enhance camera functionality, and provide more innovative user interactions. AI-driven battery management learns user habits to extend usage time by optimising background processes. Display Technology:  Advanced display technologies, including OLED panels and adaptive refresh rates up to 120Hz, ensure vibrant visuals and smooth interactions while conserving battery life, providing an immersive viewing experience. Software Innovations:  Xiaomi’s MIUI offers a seamless, customisable user experience with features like Quick Ball (implemented as a system service in MIUI) for more straightforward navigation and enhanced security measures to protect user data, ensuring a secure and user-friendly interface. All these advancements make the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 series compelling for users seeking reliable, high-performance smartphones tailored to diverse needs. Summary The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 series boasts impressive battery performance, advanced technology, and user-focused features. Each phone in the series offers unique strengths, from the Redmi Note 13 4G battery life to the high-performance Pro+ 5G. Whether you prioritise battery life, speed, or advanced features, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 series has a smartphone to meet your needs, making it a versatile and reliable choice for many users. Written By: Debbie Bouffler is the Marketing and Communications Manager at Smart V iser . She plays a crucial role in developing communication and marketing strategies for the company. Debbie has gained extensive experience in strategic business development and marketing in various industries, which has helped her excel in her current position. Debbie is a leader with imagination, an unmatched drive, and an infectious passion for growth and excellence, especially in the telecommunications industry. For further insights into her professional journey or to connect, visit Debbie on LinkedIn .   Get all the latest reviews. Join our readers to receive the latest update to our smartphone battery performance scores and performance reviews as soon as we finish testing! Affiliate Disclosure: These prices are the best from our Affiliate Partners. As an Amazon Associate, we may earn commissions from qualifying purchases from Amazon.com . Also, we link to relevant and other trusted affiliate partners like Xiaomi FR. If a ViserMark user clicks an affiliate link and purchases a smartphone from any of these affiliate sites within a set amount of time, ViserMark receives a small commission. You can learn more about our disclosure policy here .

SMARTPHONE TIER: FLAGSHIP/PRO TIER Battery Capacity mAh: 4000 Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 Smartphone Review: The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 is Familiar - But Still Improves SMARTPHONE BATTERY PERFORMANCE Based on Price: Flagship/Pro (€700+)  Flagship/Pro Tier Ranking # 5 Video Review It will be available shortly. Learn more: Quick Summary ViserMark Labels Specifications Know the Test Results ViserMark Verdict Quick Summary The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6  leads the way in foldable smartphones, continuing Samsung's innovative approach with its flip design. This smartphone merges cutting-edge hinge technology with an excellent display. The latest Snapdragon processor powers this stylish phone and offers exceptional performance that sets it apart from conventional smartphones. Pros Cons Improved folding design with bright screen and AI functionality Looks familiar, with a few improvements at a higher price Increased battery life with 1.5 days of use The cover screen lacks functionality Good 50MP camera with auto zoom feature 25W wired charging IP68 dust and water resistant 7-year support for software and security updates   ViserMark Labels for the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 The top interesting observations and highlights are based on the ViserMark labels and the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 performance. A battery performance score of 44 out of 100, suggests that the phone performs adequately but leaves room for improvement. It indicates that the phone offers a balance between battery life and performance but may not be as strong in intensive use cases or heavy multitasking when compared to higher-scoring competitors. While the battery life of 1.5 days or 38 hours is competitive, the charging time of 1 hour and 34 minutes might be less impressive than some fast-charging smartphones. This could suggest that users prioritising long battery life might appreciate the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 , but those who need quick top-ups throughout the day may find the charging speed lacking. The ViserMark labels for the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 reveal a smartphone that balances innovation with decent battery life and efficiency. While its charging time and battery performance score suggest room for improvement, the overall energy consumption and moderate efficiency rating make it a reasonable choice for environmentally conscious users. The insights suggest a well-rounded phone that caters to users who value modern design and adequate performance without the highest demand for intensive use. Specification Overview  - Released Date: July 2024 Body: 165.1 x 71.9 x 6.9 mm (unfolded) 85.1 x71.9 x9 mm (folded), weight 187g. Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 with aluminium frame. It supports multiple eSIMs, but only one physical SIM. Display : Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X 6.7-inch screen, 120Hz refresh rate with 1080 x 2640 resolution and HDR10+. IP48 dust/water rating. The folded cover is super AMOLED, 3.4 inches, and has 720 x 748 resolution. Operating System : Android 14, One UI 6.1.1. Chipset :   Qualcomm SM8650-AC Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) , Adreno 750 processor Memory : 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM . No expandable storage Connectivity :  Wi-Fi 802.11a/b/g/n / ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct. Bluetooth: Yes. NFC: Yes. Loudspeaker: Yes. Camera : Main: 50MP (wide) 12 MP (ultrawide) dual pixel PDAF, OIS , HDR, . Video: 4K@30/60fps Front Camera:  10MP (wide) and Video 4K@30/60fps Battery : 4000mAh, 25W Wired, 15W wireless and 4 . 5W reverse wireless . A Vapour Chamber has been added that dissipates heat quickly. Colour : Blue, Yellow, Mint, Silver Shadow. Online Exclusive: Crafted Black, White and Peach Discover all the Battery Performance Test Results Learn more about the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 Smartphone Battery Performance - HOW WE TEST ViserMark  offers a comprehensive range of battery performance test results based on different criteria and benchmarks for evaluating a smartphone's performance. Our tests are performed using the strictest protocol in a controlled environment to ensure repetition and consistency powered by SmartViser's test auto mation solution viSer . VWS Analytics Studio  is a complementary product to the viSer Test Automation solution. It enhances the viSer user experience and is the fastest way to analyse and view smartphone test results. We have used the interactive dashboard to show you the recent test results and translated them into ViserMark Labels. Discover all the Battery Test Results Learn more about the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 Join our readers to receive the latest update to our smartphone battery performance scores and performance reviews as soon as we finish testing! Smartphone Battery Performance - FULL TEST RESULTS AND REVIEW ViserMark has put the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6  through our testing protocol, based on real smartphone usage from 100% battery level down to power off. This includes daily activities, such as calls, web, video and music streaming, gaming, social networks, picture and video capture, and standby. All activities are executed in a defined order and timeline. These test results, show how the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6    performed and the scores achieved. 1. Battery Performance Here's the Battery Performance score for the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6. Based on the test results, let's look at the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6  battery performance compared to the Samsung Galaxy S24 and Google Pixel 8 , as well as the Flagship/Pro Tier average. Both Samsung devices have 4000mAh battery capacity and the Google Pixel 8 has a slightly larger battery of 4575mAh. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 has the best battery performance among Flagship/Pro Tier smartphones, with the Samsung Galaxy S24 and Google Pixel 8 closely following. All three phones outperform the average score for the Flagship/Pro tier, indicating their superior battery management. This comparison highlights the competitive nature of the Flagship/Pro Tier smartphone market, where even slight differences in performance can influence user choice. While battery performance is a crucial strength for the Galaxy Z Flip6, other factors such as design, features, and brand loyalty will also have significant roles in the final purchasing decision. 2. Battery Life Let's see the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6  test results. Based on the provided battery life ViserMark test results for the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 and its competitors within the Flagship/Pro (€700+) category, here are the highlights. The evaluated smartphones, including the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 , Samsung Galaxy S24 , and Google Pixel 8 , achieve approximately 1.5 days of battery life. The average for Flagship/Pro tier phones is slightly higher at 1.56 days. This consistency in battery life indicates that even though there are differences in hours, the day-to-day experience is similar across these smartphones. Despite slight variance in hourly performance, these smartphones generally provide users with reliable battery life over a day of typical use. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 offers 38 hours of battery life, which places it between the Google Pixel 8 (36 hours) and the Flagship/Pro tier average (40 hours). The Samsung Galaxy S24 has the lowest battery life at 34 hours. This suggests that the Galaxy Z Flip6 is optimised for better battery longevity compared to the other phones, making it a suitable choice for users who need longer battery life for day-to-day activities without frequent recharging. The battery life comparison for the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 reveals that it performs competitively within the Flagship/Pro tier, offering 38 hours or 1.5 days of use. This positions it favourably against the Google Pixel 8 and Samsung Galaxy S24 while being slightly below the tier average. The insights indicate that Samsung’s foldable design does not compromise battery performance, making the Z Flip6 an attractive option for users who value both innovation and battery longevity. 3.   Battery Consumption The  Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6  battery life details, as analysed using SmartViser's  viSer and VWS Analytics Studio , provide a technical and detailed perspective on the smartphone's battery consumption. The platform's capability to monitor and access real-time test results explains how it manages power under various daily user tasks. Based on the provided Battery Consumption test results, where the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 is represented in dark blue and the Samsung Galaxy S24 in light blue, here are the detailed observations. Across most daily activities, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 generally shows lower (less negative) values compared to the Samsung Galaxy S24 (light blue). This indicates that the Galaxy Z Flip6 consumes less battery power and is more efficient in these categories. The battery consumption for social media usage is higher on the Galaxy Z Flip6 compared to the Galaxy S24, also for outgoing calls, the Galaxy Z Flip6 shows higher battery consumption. Users who frequently send MMS messages might experience quicker battery drain on the Samsung Galaxy S24, making the Z Flip6 more efficient for these activities. Similarly, gamers will find the Z Flip6 more efficient, as it will require less frequent charging. On the other hand, the Samsung Galaxy S24 is a more efficient choice for multimedia enthusiasts who spend considerable time on these applications, as it will require less frequent charging. Similarly for productivity tasks like email and SMS the Samsung Galaxy S24 generally shows better battery efficiency compared to the Z Flip6. The battery consumption analysis reveals that the Samsung Galaxy S24 is generally more efficient than the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 across various activities. This makes the Galaxy S24 a better choice for users prioritising battery performance, including social media users and gamers. However, the Z Flip6 shows better efficiency in gaming and is ideal for photographers. The insights highlight the Samsung Galaxy S24’s strengths in battery efficiency, ensuring it can meet the demands of various user segments effectively. Let's compare the battery consumption of the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6  and the Google Pixel 8 using the provided test results. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 shows lower battery consumption for activities such as gaming, multimedia (YouTube and Media Player), and productivity tasks (email, SMS, web browsing). This suggests that the Z Flip6 is a more efficient choice for users who spend considerable time on these applications, offering longer usage times without frequent charging. However, the analysis reveals that the Pixel 8 is more efficient for outgoing calls and social media usage, with significantly lower battery consumption compared to the Z Flip6. This makes the Google Pixel 8 a better option for users who are heavy on social media platforms and a better choice for users who make frequent calls and need longer battery life in this area. The battery consumption analysis reveals that the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 is generally more efficient than the Google Pixel 8 across various activities. This makes it a better choice for users prioritising battery performance and highlights the Z Flip6’s strengths in battery efficiency, ensuring it can meet the demands of various users effectively, while the Pixel 8 remains a strong contender for social media enthusiasts. Finally, these test results compare the battery consumption of the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 (dark blue), Samsung Galaxy S24 (light blue), and Google Pixel 8 (orange) across various daily activities, with the average Flagship/Pro Tier (green) included as a benchmark. The analysis of battery consumption shows that the Samsung Galaxy S24 has consistently superior battery efficiency compared to the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 and Google Pixel 8 in most daily activities. The S24 performs exceptionally well in social media usage, outgoing calls, file transfer, camera usage, YouTube, media player, SMS, email, and web browsing. This makes the S24 a practical choice for users who prioritize battery life, providing extended usage between charges. On the other hand, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 shows notable battery efficiency in gaming and MMS, but lags in activities. The Google Pixel 8 performs better in social media usage compared to the Z Flip6, but has higher battery consumption in gaming, camera usage, and multimedia activities. Overall, the Samsung Galaxy S24 is the most efficient smartphone in this comparison, making it the top recommendation for users seeking optimal battery performance across a wide range of daily activities. The Samsung Galaxy S24 generally demonstrates better battery efficiency across most daily activities than the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 and Google Pixel 8 , making it the best choice for users who prioritise battery life across various activities. 4.   Battery Efficiency Taking into account the battery efficiency comparison for the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 and its competitors in the Flagship/Pro (€700+) category, here are the key observations. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 has a higher battery efficiency, which means it consumes less power compared to the other two smartphones for the same amount of use. This could lead to a lower overall environmental impact, making it an appealing choice for environmentally conscious users. It aligns with global trends towards sustainability, where energy-efficient mobile phones play an increasingly important role in reducing carbon footprints. With a significant advantage over its competitors in the Flagship/Pro tier, the battery efficiency comparison underscores the standout performance of the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 . With a 1.5 hours per unit rating, it offers enhanced efficiency, making it ideal for heavy users and those prioritising sustainability. The consistent efficiency among other Flagship phones further highlights that the Galaxy Z Flip6 is a high-performing smartphone and an environmentally conscious choice, catering to a wide range of user needs and preferences. The focus on battery efficiency positions it as a compelling option. 5.   Annual Energy Consumption Based on the annual energy consumption test results for the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 and its competitors within the Flagship/Pro (€700+) category, here are the highlights. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 has the lowest annual energy consumption among smartphones compared, consuming 3.4 kWh per year. This makes the Z Flip6 the most energy-efficient option in its category. Users who are environmentally conscious or looking to reduce their electricity bills may find this phone particularly attractive. This low energy consumption underlines Samsung's commitment to optimising power usage in their foldable devices. The annual energy consumption comparison highlights the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 as the most energy-efficient. This efficiency surpasses the Samsung Galaxy S24 and the Google Pixel 8 , the latter consuming the most energy at 4.1 kWh. The Z Flip6’s superior energy management not only appeals to environmentally conscious users but also provides practical benefits for heavy users by potentially reducing the frequency of charges. These insights reinforce its position as a strong contender in the Flagship/Pro Tier smartphone market, combining innovative design with impressive energy efficiency. ViserMark VERDICT The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 - what's it like to use? The innovative foldable design of the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 offers a unique and engaging user experience. When unfolded, it combines the convenience of a compact form factor with the functionality of a full-size smartphone. Its impressive battery efficiency and relatively low annual energy consumption make it not just a stylish choice, but a practical and value-for-money option for many users. The main display, with its vibrant colours and smooth performance, is sure to excite and engage you. The compact size, when folded, makes it incredibly easy to carry and store, catering to users who want portability. The phone's exceptional energy efficiency not only contributes to a longer battery life but also ensures that users can rely on it throughout the day with fewer charges, adding to its convenience. Pros Cons Innovative Design : The foldable screen offers a unique and practical form factor. Durability Concerns : Foldable designs can be perceived as less durable than traditional smartphones. Superior Battery Efficiency : Consumes only 3.4 kWh annually, the lowest among its peers. Learning Curve : New users may need time to adapt to the foldable form factor and its features. Long Battery Life : Efficient power management reduces the need for frequent charging. Price : As a flagship device, it comes with a premium price tag, which may be a barrier for some consumers. Environmental Impact : Lower energy consumption contributes to a reduced environmental footprint. Portability : Compact when folded, making it easy to carry and store. Who should buy the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6? Appeal to Tech Enthusiasts and Early Adopters: The innovative foldable design provides a unique and cutting-edge experience, making it an ideal choice for those who love exploring the latest technology and being among the first to try new gadgets. Attract Environmentally Conscious Users: The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 stands out with its lowest annual energy consumption among competitors, making it the perfect choice for environmentally conscious users who prioritise sustainability and want to reduce their environmental footprint. For Heavy Users and Professionals: The efficient power management and superior battery efficiency ensure long battery life, making it ideal for professionals, gamers, and anyone who relies heavily on their smartphone throughout the day. Catering to Style-Conscious Consumers and Frequent Travellers: When folded, the sleek, modern design and compact size make the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 highly portable and stylish. It is perfect for those who value aesthetics and need a powerful yet easily portable device for on-the-go use. CONCLUSION The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 is a remarkable smartphone designed to appeal to a wide range of users. Its unique foldable design, efficient power management, and modern aesthetics make it an appealing choice for those seeking innovation and practicality in their next smartphone. Whether you are a professional in need of reliable battery life, a traveller looking for a portable device, or someone who values sustainability, the Galaxy Z Flip6 offers compelling features that are worth considering. VCX (Valued Camera eXperience) The VCX Forum  has been working with its members on the system and infrastructure as a non-profit organisation. We strive to improve our technology to develop and exchange accurate and objective quality and performance indicators, which is our ultimate goal. We will also serve as a compass for the smartphone camera industry. We appreciate your interest in the VCX Forum. No VCX reviews are available for this smartphone.   Background The Samsung Group  is a South Korean multinational conglomerate headquartered in Samsung Town, Seoul. It comprises numerous affiliated businesses, most united under the Samsung brand. Samsung Electronics has assembly plants and sales networks in 74 countries and employs around 290,000 people. Samsung is a major manufacturer of electronic components such as lithium-ion batteries, semiconductors, image sensors, camera modules and displays for clients such as Apple, Sony, HTC and Nokia. Written By Debbie Bouffler is the Marketing and Communications Manager at SmartViser . She is crucial in developing the company's communication and marketing strategies. Debbie has gained extensive experience in strategic business development and marketing in various industries, which has helped her excel in her current position. Debbie is a leader with imagination, an unmatched drive, and an infectious passion for growth and excellence, especially in the telecommunications industry. Our Resources ViserMark Scores ViserMark Reviews Success Stories Latest Articles Discover what ViserMark is all about. Read ViserMark's latest in-depth smartphone battery reviews. Discover our main success stories with Telecoms and other industries. Read more articles on our battery life, performance reviews, and test results. Know more Know more Know more Know more

Google continues to push the boundaries of innovation, as demonstrated at the ninth annual Made by Google event in 2024. This year's showcase was a testament to the company’s unyielding commitment to embedding AI deeply into the fabric of everyday life. From the unveiling of the latest Pixel smartphones to the introduction of advanced wearable technology, Google is not just keeping pace with the digital age; it's defining it. With the integration of the Gemini AI across multiple devices and an array of new features in the Android ecosystem, Google is making a bold statement: AI is no longer a futuristic concept but a present-day reality that can enhance productivity, creativity, and personal expression. This article delves into the key announcements from the event, exploring how Google’s latest offerings, including the Pixel 9 series, Pixel Watch 3, and Pixel Buds Pro 2, are set to redefine user experiences. Gemini: The Heart of Google's AI Ambitions At the core of Google's 2024 innovations is Gemini , the company’s latest AI model that is set to revolutionise how users interact with their devices. Gemini is not merely an upgrade to existing AI systems; it represents a paradigm shift in how AI can be seamlessly integrated into daily life. The deep integration of Gemini into Android OS means that this AI is now accessible to billions of users worldwide, offering a more natural, context-aware interaction with technology. Gemini Live , one of the flagship features, introduces a conversational AI experience that feels remarkably human. Unlike traditional digital assistants that rely on scripted responses, Gemini Live can understand context, follow complex threads of conversation, and even manage multi-step tasks. Whether you’re brainstorming a project, seeking detailed information, or managing everyday tasks, Gemini Live promises to be a versatile companion. It can seamlessly switch between contexts, allowing users to interrupt or revisit conversations as needed, making it a truly dynamic tool in the modern user’s arsenal. Google has also ensured that Gemini prioritises user privacy and security. By keeping data processing on the device for many tasks, Gemini minimises the need for external data transfers, thus reducing the risk of breaches. This on-device processing is powered by the new Tensor G4 chip , which is designed to handle the demands of advanced AI models like Gemini with efficiency and speed. For the most sensitive tasks, Gemini ensures that your data never leaves your phone, offering a layer of security that is increasingly crucial in today’s digital world. The Pixel 9 Series: A Leap in Mobile Innovation Google’s Pixel series has long been synonymous with cutting-edge technology, and the 2024 lineup continues this tradition with the introduction of the Pixel 9 , Pixel 9 Pro , Pixel 9 Pro XL , and Pixel 9 Pro Fold . These devices are not just about incremental upgrades; they represent a significant leap in both hardware and software capabilities, powered by the Tensor G4 chip. Design and Display : The Pixel 9 series introduces a refined design that not only enhances aesthetics but also improves functionality. The new models feature the sleek Super Actua displays, which are the brightest and most vibrant screens Google has produced. With sizes ranging from 6.3 inches on the Pixel 9 Pro to 6.8 inches on the Pixel 9 Pro XL, these devices cater to a wide range of preferences. The Pixel 9 Pro Fold, Google’s latest foldable, offers the largest inner display ever seen on a mobile device, providing an immersive experience for multitasking and media consumption. Camera Innovations : Photography has always been a standout feature of Pixel phones, and the Pixel 9 series takes this to the next level. Both the Pixel 9 Pro and Pro XL are equipped with a triple rear camera system that includes a 48MP telephoto lens with enhanced autofocus capabilities, ensuring sharper images even in challenging light conditions. The front camera, now upgraded to 42MP, offers improved low-light performance and a wider field of view, making it perfect for group selfies and video calls. For users who prefer a more compact device, the Pixel 9  delivers the same powerful main and ultra-wide cameras as its Pro counterparts. The ultrawide lens captures significantly more light, ensuring crystal-clear images and stunning macro shots. Google has also introduced a completely revamped HDR+ imaging pipeline, which enhances the realism of photos by optimising exposure, tone mapping, and contrast to better capture textures, shadows, and skin tones. AI-Driven Photography Features Google’s investment in AI is most evident in the photography features of the Pixel 9 series . These features are designed not just to capture moments but to enhance and perfect them, ensuring that users get the best possible outcome with minimal effort. Super Res Zoom Video : This feature leverages AI to allow users to zoom up to 20x while recording videos, even in low-light conditions. The advanced machine learning algorithms combine data from multiple frames to create richly detailed videos, making it ideal for capturing events from a distance. Add Me : This innovative tool ensures that no one is left out of group photos. By using augmented reality and AI, the Pixel can guide users through taking multiple shots, which it then seamlessly merges, ensuring that everyone is included in the final image without the need for a third-party photographer. Magic Editor with Reimagine : The Magic Editor has been a hallmark of Pixel photography for a few years now, and with the addition of Reimagine, it’s become even more powerful. Users can now simply describe the changes they want to see in a photo, and the AI will make it happen. Whether it’s altering the sky, adding elements to the background, or refining the composition, the Magic Editor makes it all possible with just a few taps. Night Sight in Panorama : This feature extends Google’s renowned Night Sight capabilities to panorama mode, allowing users to capture stunning low-light landscapes. The AI optimises each segment of the panorama, ensuring consistent quality across the entire image. Pixel Watch 3: A Health Companion with a Lifesaving Feature Wearable technology has taken a significant step forward with the introduction of the Pixel Watch 3 . This smartwatch is not just about fitness tracking and notifications; it’s about saving lives. The Pixel Watch 3 introduces Loss of Pulse Detection , a groundbreaking feature that can detect when the wearer’s heart has stopped beating. In such critical situations, the watch can automatically alert emergency services, potentially making the difference between life and death. The Pixel Watch 3 is designed for both health enthusiasts and those seeking advanced safety features. It offers the most accurate heart rate tracking for running to date, thanks to new advanced motion sensing and machine learning algorithms. After a run, the watch provides a comprehensive analysis of the user’s form, including metrics like cadence, stride length, and ground contact time, helping users improve their performance over time. Google has also introduced new features like Daily Readiness , Cardio Load , and Target Load , which offer personalised insights into recovery and training. These tools help users maintain a balanced approach to fitness, ensuring they are not overtraining and are adequately prepared for their next workout. The integration with Fitbit Premium  further enhances the Pixel Watch 3’s capabilities, offering tailored workout recommendations based on the user’s previous activities and current recovery status. With these features, the Pixel Watch 3 is positioned not just as a fitness tracker but as a comprehensive health and wellness companion. Pixel Buds Pro 2: The AI-Enhanced Audio Experience Rounding out the hardware announcements, Google introduced the Pixel Buds Pro 2 , which are designed to deliver an unparalleled audio experience. These earbuds are powered by the new Tensor A1 chip , which brings a host of improvements, including twice the noise cancellation of the previous generation. The Pixel Buds Pro 2 are also more compact and comfortable, featuring a design that is 24% lighter and 27% smaller than their predecessors. Despite their smaller size, the earbuds do not compromise on performance. The Tensor A1 chip enables ultra-low latency audio processing, ensuring that the sound quality remains top-notch even as the environment around the user changes. These earbuds are also deeply integrated with Gemini, making them a powerful tool for hands-free AI interaction. Users can access Gemini without needing to take out their phone, enabling them to get directions, manage appointments, or even engage in conversations on the go. This hands-free capability is particularly useful for those who are constantly on the move and need to stay connected without the hassle of pulling out their device. Android 15 Android 15, the latest iteration of Google’s mobile operating system, was a significant highlight of the Made by Google 2024 event. Set to be released later in 2024, Android 15 promises to bring a host of new features designed to enhance user experience, security, and device integration. While many of these features were introduced during the event, the full rollout is expected to begin towards the end of the year, following Google’s typical pattern of updates. The rollout of Android 15 will likely start with Google’s own Pixel devices, in line with the company's usual update strategy. This initial release is anticipated to coincide with the availability of Google’s newest hardware, such as the Pixel 9 series. Following this, the update will gradually become available on other Android devices over subsequent months, with timing varying based on the device and region. Users are advised to keep an eye on official announcements from Google for precise rollout dates. Android 15 is packed with features that focus on bolstering privacy, enhancing security, and deepening AI integration across devices: Private Space : One of the standout features of Android 15 is Private Space, which allows users to create a secure, separate area on their devices for sensitive apps. This digital safe ensures that personal information, such as health or banking data, remains protected from prying eyes, offering an extra layer of security for apps that require it. Theft Detection Lock : In a bid to enhance device security, Android 15 introduces Theft Detection Lock, an AI-powered feature that detects suspicious activity—such as someone forcibly taking your phone—and automatically locks the device to prevent unauthorised access. This feature is a significant step forward in protecting user data in the event of theft. AI-Powered Enhancements : Android 15 integrates AI more deeply into the operating system, providing AI-powered recommendations in Google TV and enhanced real-time fraud protection through Google Play Protect. These AI-driven features not only make entertainment more intuitive but also provide robust protection against malicious apps and phishing attempts. Augmented Reality in Google Maps : The update also includes improvements to AR in Google Maps, expanding the immersive content available to users and making navigation more interactive and informative. Expanded Ecosystem Integration : Android 15 broadens its ecosystem by introducing more apps and entertainment options in vehicles with Google built-in. This includes the ability to cast content directly from your phone to your car’s display, enhancing the in-car entertainment experience. Conclusion: AI at the Centre of Google's Vision The 2024 Made by Google event underscored Google's deepening commitment to AI integration across its product lineup. While the event introduced new hardware like the Pixel 9 series and Pixel Watch 3, the focus was clearly on how AI, particularly through the Gemini platform, is becoming central to Google's ecosystem. These innovations, such as the Pixel 9's advanced computational photography and Android 15’s security enhancements, highlight Google's efforts to make technology more intuitive and secure. However, alongside these advancements, there are rising concerns about privacy and data security, which Google must address as it continues to push the boundaries of AI. Written By: Marcella Frattari  is the Digital Communications Manager at SmartViser, primarily responsible for ViserMark content creation and social media management. She holds a journalism background and is pursuing a master's degree in digital communications and marketing. Marcella brings a dynamic and creative approach to her work, consistently striving to enhance the company's online presence and engagement. Press Contact Debbie Bouffler: Contact@visermark.com   Never miss out on our FREE Smartphone Reviews. Add  your email below to sign up for  our monthly newsletter ,   which provides all the latest mobile phones that ViserMark has tried  and tested. No pressure; you can unsubscribe anytime,  and we promise not to fill up your inbox.

Battery performance is often a critical factor when evaluating smartphones that can significantly impact user satisfaction. Traditionally, Flagship/Pro (€700 +) smartphones are expected to outshine Mid Tier (€200-€499)  ones due to their premium pricing and advanced technology. However, data from ViserMark’s battery performance labels and battery consumption test results reveal surprising insights that challenge this conventional wisdom, particularly in everyday tasks. Battery Life: Flagship vs. Mid Tier Smartphones On average, Mid Tier smartphones demonstrate impressive battery life, often outperforming Flagship phones. For instance, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G delivers a remarkable 2.5 days of use or 61 hours of battery life, according to ViserMark labels. In contrast, Flagship/Pro smartphones like the Samsung Galaxy S24 and Google Pixel 8 Pro offer around 1.5 days of use, between 34 to 38 hours of use despite their cutting-edge features and higher price tags. This discrepancy can be attributed mainly to the power consumption patterns during everyday tasks. Flagship/Pro smartphones typically consume more power due to their advanced processors, higher-resolution screens, and additional features. For example, during social media usage, the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra shows significantly higher power consumption, drawing around -803 mAh, compared to the Samsung Galaxy A15 from the Mid Tier, which consumes -785 mAh. While the difference may seem small, it accumulates over the day, leading to a shorter overall battery life for Flagship/Pro mobile phones. However, when it comes to media playback, mid-tier models often show more efficient energy use. For example, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G (Mid Tier) consumes -364.01 mAh, which is less than the -528.34 mAh consumed by the Flagship/Pro Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra . This suggests that Mid Tier smartphones can offer better energy management during specific tasks like media playback, extending battery life without sacrificing too much in terms of functionality. Efficiency in Everyday Tasks The ViserMark test results also highlight how Mid Tier smartphones maintain energy efficiency across various everyday tasks. For instance, during web browsing, the Motorola Moto G34 consumes -373 mAh, significantly more than the Samsung Galaxy S24 at -266 mAh. This efficiency extends to other activities like emailing and media playback, where Mid Tier phones like the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G consistently show lower power consumption, allowing for longer uninterrupted use throughout the day. Another example is camera usage. The Google Pixel 8 Pro , a Flagship/Pro device, consumes -784.95 mAh, whereas the Realme Narzo 50 , a Mid Tier phone, uses around -699.91 mAh for the same task. This suggests that while Flagship/Pro phones offer superior camera features, Mid Tier phones strike a better balance between functionality and power consumption, offering a more sustainable user experience. Consumer Implications and Insights For consumers, these insights suggest that Mid Tier smartphones offer a compelling balance between performance and battery life, often rivalling, and sometimes exceeding, Flagship/Pro models in terms of energy efficiency. This is particularly relevant for users who prioritise longevity over premium features, such as those who use their phones heavily for basic tasks like social media, web browsing, and communication. Also, Mid Tier phone's energy efficiency translates to lower annual energy consumption, making these mobile phones more cost-effective in the long run and environmentally friendly. For instance, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G consumes less annual energy than the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra , highlighting the practical advantages of choosing a Mid Tier device. Conclusion: Flagship vs. Mid Tier Smartphones In conclusion, while Flagship/Pro smartphones continue to lead in innovation and high-end performance, Mid Tier phones have proven formidable contenders regarding battery life and efficiency. For consumers, opting for a Mid Tier smartphone could offer better value, especially if battery longevity and energy efficiency are top priorities. This analysis underscores the importance of looking beyond brand prestige and price tags to find a smartphone that truly meets the requirements in everyday use. Written By Debbie Bouffler is the Marketing and Communications Manager at SmartViser . She is crucial in developing the company's communication and marketing strategies. Debbie has gained extensive experience in strategic business development and marketing in various industries, which has helped her excel in her current position. Debbie is a leader with imagination, an unmatched drive, and an infectious passion for growth and excellence, especially in the telecommunications industry.

SMARTPHONE TIER: MID TIER Battery Capacity mAh: 5000 Sony Xperia 10 V 5G Smartphone Review: The Sony Xperia 10 V 5G - An Impressive Experience SMARTPHONE BATTERY PERFORMANCE Based on Price: Mid (€200-€499)  Entry Tier Ranking #9 Learn more: Quick Summary ViserMark Labels Specifications Know the Test Results ViserMark Verdict Video Review Quick Summary The Sony Xperia 10 V 5G offers exceptional picture and sound quality, catering perfectly to multimedia enthusiasts. Despite its budget-friendly price, it provides an impressive experience for watching movies and listening to music. The combination of a brighter, more colour-accurate OLED display and stereo speakers enhances the overall viewing and listening experience, making it suitable for social media enthusiasts, casual gamers, and media consumers who value high-quality visuals and sound. In addition to its multimedia strengths, the Xperia 10 V 5G provides efficient battery usage for specific tasks, ensuring longer usage times for social media browsing, gaming, and web surfing. Although it faces challenges such as longer charging times and higher annual energy consumption compared to its peers, its sleek design, robust build, and overall performance make it a versatile choice for various user needs. Whether you're seeking a reliable daily driver or a device that excels in specific areas, the Sony Xperia 10 V 5G offers a balanced mix of performance and practicality. Explore our detailed review to see how this smartphone can meet your unique needs and preferences. Pros Cons Bright 6.1-inch screen with 21:9 aspect display 60Hz refresh rate High-resolution audio with a 3.5mm headphone jack Reasonable 1 day of Use battery life Quality design and easy to hold Average performance for the price range Good camera set-up Longer charging time IP68 dust and water resistant   ViserMark Labels for the Sony Xperia 10 V5G Based on the ViserMark test results provided for the Sony Xperia V 5G , here’s a detailed breakdown of the battery performance translated into ViserMark Labels. The Sony Xperia 10 V 5G provides a respectable battery performance with a strong battery life, making it a reliable option for users who need a phone that can last throughout the day and beyond. However, its longer charging time is a consideration for those who prefer quick top-ups. What's truly impressive is its overall battery efficiency and energy consumption, aligning with its status as a budget-friendly device for multimedia consumption. Specification Overview  - Released Date: May 2023 Body: 155 x 68 x 8.3 mm, weight 159g. Corning Gorilla Glass Victus Display : FHD+ OLED 6.1-inch screen, 60Hz refresh rate with 2520 x 1080 resolution. IP65/IP68 dust/water rating. Nano-SIM and eSIM or Dual SIM (Nano-SIM) Operating System : Android 13, upgradable to Android 14 Chipset :   Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm), Octa-core processor Memory : 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM. microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) Connectivity :  Wi-Fi 802.11a/b/g/n / ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct. Bluetooth: Yes. NFC: Yes. Loudspeaker: Yes. 3.5mm Jack: Yes with Hi-Res audio Camera : Triple set-up - Main: 48MP (wide) 8 MP (telephoto) and 8 MP (ultrawide) with LED flash, HDR, and panorama. Video1080p@30fps Front Camera:  8 MP (wide). HDR and Video 1080p@30fps Battery : 5000mAh, Wired, fast charging. Xperia Adaptive Charging, Battery Care and STAMINA Mode Colour : Sage Green, Lavender, White and Black Discover all the Battery Performance Test Results Learn more about the Sony Xperia 10 V 5G   Smartphone Battery Performance - HOW WE TEST ViserMark  offers a comprehensive range of battery performance test results based on different criteria and benchmarks for evaluating a smartphone's performance. Our tests are performed using the strictest protocol in a controlled environment to ensure repetition and consistency powered by SmartViser's test auto mation solution viSer . VWS Analytics Studio  is a complementary product to the viSer Test Automation solution. It enhances the viSer user experience and is the fastest way to analyse and view smartphone test results. We have used the interactive dashboard to show you the recent test results and translated them into ViserMark Labels. Discover all the Battery Test Results Learn more about the Sony Xperia 10 V 5G Join our readers to receive the latest update to our smartphone battery performance scores and performance reviews as soon as we finish testing! Smartphone Battery Performance - FULL TEST RESULTS AND REVIEW ViserMark has put the Sony Xperia 10 V 5G  through our testing protocol, based on real smartphone usage from 100% battery level down to power off. This includes daily activities, such as calls, web, video and music streaming, gaming, social networks, picture and video capture, and standby. All activities are executed in a defined order and timeline. These test results, show how the Sony Xperia 10 V 5G  performed and the scores achieved. 1. Battery Performance Here's the Battery Performance score for the Sony Xperia V 5G. Based on the test results, let's look at the Sony Xperia 10 V 5G battery performance compared to the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G and Samsung Galaxy A15 , as well as the Mid Tier average. All three devices have 5000mAh battery capacity. The battery performance of the Sony Xperia 10 V 5G reflects its strengths and areas where it lags behind its competitors. With a battery performance score of 28 out of 100, it falls significantly below the Mid Tier average of 44, as well as its competitors, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G  and the Samsung Galaxy A15 , which score 43 and 49, respectively. The overall battery performance is hindered by a significantly longer charging time of 3 hours and 19 minutes, which is considerably more than the 1.5-hour charging times of its peers. Additionally, the Xperia 10 V 5G has the highest annual energy consumption at 4.9 kWh, indicating less efficiency over the long term. 2. Battery Life Let's see the Sony Xperia 10 V 5G test results. The Sony Xperia 10 V 5G has a mixed battery life performance, providing 1 day or 33 hours under typical usage conditions, suitable for moderate daily use. However, this falls short compared to competitors like the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G  and Samsung Galaxy A15 , which offer longer battery ratings of 1.5 and 2 days, respectively. One of the standout features of the Sony Xperia 10 V 5G is its efficient battery consumption for specific daily activities. It performs well in social media usage, gaming, and web browsing, consuming less battery power than its competitors. This efficiency allows users to enjoy extended usage for these tasks without frequent recharges. While the Sony Xperia 10 V 5G excels in specific tasks and offers decent battery life for moderate use, its longer charging times and higher energy consumption may be drawbacks for users seeking more comprehensive battery life. 3.   Battery Consumption The  Sony Xperia 10 V 5G  battery life details, as analysed using SmartViser's  viSer and VWS Analytics Studio , provide a technical and detailed perspective on the smartphone's battery consumption. The platform's capability to monitor and access real-time test results explains how it manages power under various daily user tasks. The chart below shows the Sony Xperia 10 V 5G battery consumption compared to the Samsung Galaxy A15 . For social media enthusiasts, the Sony Xperia 10 V 5G offers superior battery efficiency, consuming significantly less power than the Samsung Galaxy A15. This means more scrolling and fewer interruptions to recharge. Similarly,  it uses much less battery power for outgoing calls and sending multimedia messages, making it ideal for users constantly on the phone. Like all the Xperia series, the Sony Xperia 10 V is no exception for camera performance. Like its predecessor, Sony offers exceptional camera performance at the price, with a 48MP primary sensor replacing the 12MP from its predecessor, although the telephoto and ultrawide lenses remain at 8MP. Despite this, the Samsung Galaxy A15 excels in battery efficiency for camera use and will let you take more photos on a single charge. Gamers will appreciate the Xperia 10 V 5G’s lower battery consumption during gaming sessions, meaning longer playtimes and less downtime. Lower consumption rates for YouTube and media playback make the Sony Xperia 10 V ideal for streaming music and movies. The screen is a Full HD+ 6-inch display with a 21:9 aspect ratio, which means the display is taller than the screen on your current smartphone. Turning the phone to landscape mode provides an optimally sized display for watching videos, viewing photos, or playing games. The Sony Xperia 10 V 5G  emerges as the more battery-efficient option across most daily activities. Also, it supports 5G for faster mobile data speeds, so users can enjoy longer browsing sessions and file transfers. making it an excellent choice for users looking for a well-rounded device with superior battery efficiency across various tasks. Let's compare the battery consumption of the Sony Xperia 10 V 5G and the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G using the provided test results. From the chart above, the Sony Xperia 10 V 5G is significantly more efficient, consuming much less battery for social media usage compared to the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G . This means longer usage on social platforms before needing to recharge. Also, it shows better efficiency with outgoing calls and MMS. As mentioned earlier, the Sony Xperia 10 V 5G demonstrates superior battery efficiency during gaming, allowing for longer gaming sessions. It also enables longer listening and viewing times during media playback. Interestingly, both the Sony Xperia 10 V 5G and Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 have nearly identical battery consumption when streaming YouTube videos, making either one a good choice for video streaming. It's worth noting that the Sony Xperia 10 V has significantly improved speaker performance. Sony has added a stereo speaker set-up similar to its higher-priced phones, making it a worthwhile upgrade. Based on the battery consumption data for various daily activities, the Sony Xperia 10 V 5G  generally demonstrates better battery efficiency compared to the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G . Although both smartphones show similar battery consumption for camera usage, the Xiaomi device has higher battery consumption across various tasks, which may lead to more frequent recharges. A well-rounded performance with superior battery management is delivered by the Sony Xperia 10 V 5G making it an attractive option for smartphone users. With key findings from the battery performance analysis, the Sony Xperia 10 V 5G , Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G, and Samsung Galaxy A15 all feature a 5000 mAh battery, slightly above the mid-tier average of 4930 mAh. Despite this, the battery performance scores vary significantly, with the Xperia 10 V 5G scoring 28/100, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G at 43/100, and the Samsung Galaxy A15 leading with 49/100. The mid-tier average score is 44/100, highlighting that both the Xiaomi and Samsung devices perform closer to or above the average, whereas the Sony phone lags. For specific daily activities, the Sony Xperia 10 V 5G generally demonstrates better battery efficiency. It consumes the least battery for social media, outgoing calls, MMS, gaming, file transfer, YouTube, media player, SMS, email and web browsing. In contrast, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G shows the highest consumption across most activities, notably social media and gaming while the Samsung Galaxy A15 shows balanced consumption but is slightly more efficient for camera use. The Sony Xperia 10 V 5G is known for its efficiency in specific tasks, making it a good choice for users who prioritise daily activities with lower battery consumption. However, its long charging time and low power efficiency affect its overall battery performance. On the other hand, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G offers a better balance of battery life and charging speed, but at the cost of higher consumption for daily activities. The Samsung Galaxy A15 is the best overall performer, providing the longest battery life, efficient power usage, and quick charging. It is ideal for users in need of a reliable and long-lasting device. For those seeking efficiency in daily tasks, the Sony Xperia 10 V 5G is a noteworthy option. 4.   Battery Efficiency In the highly competitive Mid Tier smartphone market, battery efficiency is a critical factor. When comparing battery performance for the Sony Xperia 10 V 5G , the Samsung Galaxy A15 and the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G , significant differences are revealed in efficiency and power management. Here are the test results for the Sony Xperia 10 V 5G. The efficiency score indicates how effectively a smartphone uses its battery. A higher score represents better efficiency. The Sony Xperia 10 V 5G  demonstrates notable efficiency in specific tasks but suffers from a lower overall battery efficiency score, longer charging times, and higher annual energy consumption. This makes it less attractive for users seeking overall battery efficiency. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G  offers a balanced performance with better efficiency than the Sony device but still falls short of the mid-tier average. It compensates with a faster charging time, making it a decent choice for users who prioritise quick recharges. The Samsung Galaxy A15  is the most efficient device, offering superior battery life, faster charging, and the lowest annual energy consumption. This makes it the best choice for smartphone users who demand both performance and efficiency. 5.   Annual Energy Consumption Annual energy consumption is an important metric for understanding the long-term efficiency and cost-effectiveness of a smartphone. This comparison evaluates the annual energy consumption of the Sony Xperia 10 V 5G against the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G , Samsung Galaxy A15 , and the mid-tier average. The Sony Xperia 10 V 5G has the highest annual energy consumption at 4.9 kWh. This indicates that over a year, the device requires more energy to operate compared to the other two smartphones. This higher consumption can be attributed to its lower battery efficiency and longer charging times. Users of the Xperia 10 V 5G may incur higher electricity costs and a greater environmental impact over the device's lifespan. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G , while more efficient than the Sony device, still consumes more energy annually than the Mid Tier average. Its balanced performance and faster charging are offset by higher energy demands, suggesting room for optimisation in battery usage. The Samsung Galaxy A15  excels with the lowest annual energy consumption among the compared devices. This makes it the most efficient choice for users concerned with long-term energy costs and environmental impact. Its superior battery management and quick charging capabilities contribute to its outstanding performance in this metric. ViserMark VERDICT The Sony Xperia V 5G - what's it like to use? The Sony Xperia 10 V 5G delivers a mixed experience, heavily influenced by its battery performance and efficiency. On one hand, it excels in specific daily activities such as social media, gaming, and web browsing, consuming significantly less battery than its competitors. This efficiency allows users to enjoy prolonged usage in these areas without frequent recharges, making it suitable for those who prioritise these activities. However, the device's overall battery performance score is relatively low and it has a notably longer charging time. This could be a drawback for users who need quick top-ups throughout the day, causing inconvenience during heavy usage periods. Additionally, the annual energy consumption of the Sony Xperia 10 V 5G is the highest, indicating less efficiency over the long term. Despite its lower battery efficiency and higher energy consumption, its performance in specific tasks and reliable battery life make it a competent daily driver for routine activities. The design and build quality of the Sony Xperia 10 V 5G, combined with its water and dust resistance, add to its appeal, providing a durable and functional smartphone experience. However, users may need to weigh these benefits against the longer charging times and higher energy costs. Pros Cons Superior battery efficiency in social media, gaming and web browsing. Low battery performance score (28/100) compared to competitors. Water and dust resistance (IP65/68), offering greater protection. Significantly longer charging time (3 hours and 19 minutes), which may be inconvenient for users needing quick top-ups. Low battery consumption for media player and YouTube, ideal for media consumption. Highest annual energy consumption (4.9 kWh), leading to higher long-term energy costs. Efficient battery usage for SMS and email, supporting extensive communication. Higher battery consumption for camera activities compared to competitors, making it less efficient for photography, despite upgrades Lightweight and compact design, making it easy to carry and handle. Shorter overall battery life (1 day, 33 hours), requiring more frequent recharges compared to competitors Who should buy the Sony Xperia V 5G? Here are the types of users who might find the Sony Xperia 10 V 5G particularly beneficial: Social Media Enthusiasts For users who spend a significant amount of time on social media platforms, the Xperia 10 V 5G’s battery efficiency in this area is a key advantage. It consumes less battery power for social media use compared to its competitors, allowing for extended browsing and interaction without frequent recharges. Enhanced display and screen quality provide a better viewing experience, with improvements in brightness and colour accuracy. Gamers Casual gamers will appreciate the Xperia 10 V 5G’s efficient battery usage during gaming sessions. With a lower battery consumption rate for gaming, users can enjoy longer playtimes before needing to recharge. The improved screen quality ensures a more immersive gaming experience with better visuals and stereo speakers enhance the gaming experience with clear and rich sound. Media Consumers The Sony Xperia 10 V 5G is ideal for users who frequently watch videos and listen to music. Its low battery consumption for media playback and YouTube makes it a suitable choice for media consumption, and the upgraded display quality enhances the viewing experience with sharper and more vibrant visuals, while the stereo speakers provide a superior audio experience, making media consumption more enjoyable. CONCLUSION The Sony Xperia 10 V 5G is an attractive option for users who prioritise specific features over general improvements. Its sleek and lightweight design makes it easy to handle and carry around. The device is also notable for its water and dust resistance, which enhances its durability for everyday use. In addition, the inclusion of stereo speakers provides a high-quality audio experience, enhancing the enjoyment of multimedia content. While the Sony Xperia 10 V 5G may not excel in every aspect, it combines practical features with efficient performance, making it a versatile choice for a range of user needs. VCX (Valued Camera eXperience) The VCX Forum  has been working with its members on the system and infrastructure as a non-profit organisation. We strive to improve our technology to develop and exchange accurate and objective quality and performance indicators, which is our ultimate goal. We will also serve as a compass for the smartphone camera industry. We appreciate your interest in the VCX Forum. No VCX reviews are available for this smartphone. Background The Sony Group Corporation  was founded in May 1946, and its Headquarters is in Tokyo, Japan. The Sony Group consists of the following segments: Game & Network Services, Music, Pictures, Entertainment Technology & Services (Mobile Communications/Imaging Products & Solutions/Home Entertainment & Sound), Imaging & Sensing Solutions, Financial Services, and All Other businesses. While Sony smartphones may not have as prominent a market presence as some other brands, they are known for their unique features, sleek designs, and emphasis on audio-visual technologies. Written By Debbie Bouffler is the Marketing and Communications Manager at SmartViser . She is crucial in developing the company's communication and marketing strategies. Debbie has gained extensive experience in strategic business development and marketing in various industries, which has helped her excel in her current position. Debbie is a leader with imagination, an unmatched drive, and an infectious passion for growth and excellence, especially in the telecommunications industry. Our Resources ViserMark Scores ViserMark Reviews Success Stories Latest Articles Discover what ViserMark is all about. Read ViserMark's latest in-depth smartphone battery reviews. Discover our main success stories with Telecoms and other industries. Read more articles on our battery life, performance reviews, and the latest test results. Know more Know more Know more Know more

SMARTPHONE TIER: ENTRY TIER Battery Capacity mAh: 5000 Motorola Moto G34 Smartphone Review: The Affordable Motorola Moto G34 - Perfect for Everyday Communication SMARTPHONE BATTERY PERFORMANCE Based on Price: Entry Tier (€0-€199)  Entry Tier Ranking # 11 Learn more: Quick Summary ViserMark Labels Specifications Know the Test Results ViserMark Verdict Video Review Quick Summary The Motorola Moto G34 stands out as a budget-friendly smartphone tailored for communication-centric users. With efficient battery management for tasks like outgoing calls, MMS, and SMS, it ensures you stay connected throughout the day without frequent recharges. Offering up to 53 hours of battery life, the Moto G34 handles essential tasks such as browsing, emailing, and light multimedia consumption with ease. While it may not be the top choice for heavy multimedia and gaming enthusiasts, this smartphone's balanced performance and affordability make it a compelling option for students, retirees, and budget-conscious users. Its strong value proposition and dependable performance in the Entry Tier (€0-€199) invite users to explore more about this reliable and practical smartphone. Pros Cons Good design with a matte finish and a vegan leather back Slow charging Excellent battery life - 2 days of use Camera lacking in some features Affordable mobile phone IP52 rating     ViserMark Labels Specification Overview  - Released Date: December 2023 Body: 162.7 x 74.6 x 8 mm , weight 179g Display : LCD IPS 6.5 inch screen, 120Hz with 720 x 1600 pixels, IP52 rating water-repellent and Nano-SIM, eSIM or Dual SIM Operating System : Android 14 Chipset :   Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm), Memory : 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM Connectivity :  Wi-Fi 802.11a/b/g/n. Bluetooth: Yes. NFC: Yes. 3.5mm Jack: Yes Camera : Dual set-up - Main: 50 MP (wide) and 2 MP (macro) with LED flash, HDR. Video1080p@30fps Front Camera: 14 MP (wide). Video 1080p@30fps Battery : 5000 mAh, 18W wired Colour : Charcoal Black, Ice Blue, Ocean Green, Vanilla Cream Discover all the Battery Performance Test Results Learn more about the Motorola Moto G34 Smartphone Battery Performance - HOW WE TEST ViserMark  offers a comprehensive range of battery performance test results based on different criteria and benchmarks for evaluating a smartphone's performance. Our tests are performed using the strictest protocol in a controlled environment to ensure repetition and consistency powered by SmartViser's test automation solution viSer .   VWS Analytics Studio  is a complementary product to the viSer Test Automation solution. It enhances the viSer user experience and is the fastest way to analyse and view smartphone test results. We have used the interactive dashboard to show you the recent test results for the Motorola Moto G34 and translated them into ViserMark Labels. Discover all the Battery Performance Test Results Learn more about the Motorola Moto G34 Join our readers to receive the latest update to our smartphone battery performance scores and performance reviews as soon as we finish testing! Smartphone Battery Performance - FULL TEST RESULTS AND REVIEW We put the Motorola Moto G34 through our testing protocol, based on real smartphone usage from 100% battery level down to power off. This includes daily activities such as calls, web, video and music streaming, gaming, social networks, picture and video capture, and standby. All activities are executed in a defined order and timeline. These test results, show how the Motorola Moto G34 performed and the scores achieved. 1. Battery Performance ViserMark can identify smartphones' strengths and weaknesses by comparing battery performance across similar mobile phones. This score reflects the battery's overall performance based on various metrics such as battery life, charging speed, power efficiency, and real-world usage. Here's the Battery Performance score for the Motorola Moto G34 The graph below illustrates the battery performance scores of the Motorola Moto G34  compared to other popular smartphones, the Xiaomi Redmi 13C and the Samsung Galaxy A15. These smartphones have been selected based on price (€0-€199) and have comparable battery performance, the Xiaomi Redmi 13C scored 52, and the Samsung Galaxy A15 scored 49. The Motorola Moto G34 scored 43 out of 100, almost on par with the Entry Tier average score of 44, collated from all tested smartphones within the Entry Tier. In summary, the Xiaomi Redmi 13C leads with superior battery performance, making it the best option for users prioritising battery reliability and longevity. The Samsung Galaxy A15 also offers strong battery performance, suitable for users seeking a balanced and dependable battery experience. The Motorola Moto G34, while adequate, may not provide the same level of efficiency and longevity, positioning it slightly below the average in the Entry Tier segment. This detailed comparison helps users make informed decisions based on their specific battery performance needs. 2. Battery Life Battery life remains one of the most important considerations for smartphone users. Often referred to as battery autonomy, it is trying to keep pace with smartphone improvements, such as higher-resolution displays and quality cameras. Let's see the Motorola Moto G34 test results. The charts visualise the battery life performance of the Motorola Moto G34, Samsung Galaxy A15, and Xiaomi Redmi 13C compared against the Entry Tier average. When examining the battery life in terms of days of use, both the Motorola Moto G34 and Samsung Galaxy A15 deliver a consistent performance of 2 days, aligning with the Entry Tier average. However, the Xiaomi Redmi 13C stands out significantly by offering 2.5 days of use, which is a notable increase and highlights its superior battery management and longevity. This extended battery life makes the Redmi 13C particularly appealing for users who need their phones to last longer between charges. In terms of hours of use, the Xiaomi Redmi 13C continues to lead with an impressive 57 hours of battery life. This is substantially higher than the Motorola Moto G34, which provides 53 hours, and the Samsung Galaxy A15, which offers 52 hours. Both are slightly above the entry tier average of 51 hours, indicating they still perform well within the Entry Tier. The additional hours provided by the Redmi 13C can be crucial for users engaged in prolonged activities like gaming, streaming, or extensive communication. The Motorola Moto G34 , while delivering solid performance, slightly lags behind the Xiaomi model but still offers respectable battery life, ensuring it remains competitive in the Entry Tier market. Overall, the Xiaomi Redmi 13C emerges as the top performer of battery autonomy, both in days and hours of use, setting a high standard for Entry Tier smartphones. The Samsung Galaxy A15 and Motorola Moto G34, while performing adequately and meeting the Entry Tier expectations, do not match the exceptional battery life of the Redmi 13C. 3.   Battery Consumption The  Motorola Moto G34  battery life details, as analysed using SmartViser's  viSer and VWS Analytics Studio , provide a technical and detailed perspective on the smartphone's battery consumption. The platform's capability to monitor and access real-time test results explains how it manages power under various daily user tasks. Below is a graph that provides a detailed analysis of the battery consumption for the Motorola Moto G34 (dark blue). It has been compared with the Xiaomi Redmi 13C (light blue), another popular Entry Tier smartphone as a comparison. Each activity's battery consumption is measured in mAh, with lower consumption indicating better efficiency. The Xiaomi Redmi 13C generally shows superior battery management across most activities, particularly in social media usage, gaming, and multimedia tasks. Its efficient power consumption in these areas aligns with its higher overall battery performance score and extended battery life. On the other hand, the Motorola Moto G34 , while consuming more battery in specific areas, performs efficiently in communication tasks like outgoing calls and MMS. This detailed consumption breakdown indicates that the Redmi 13C is better suited for heavy media and social media users, whereas the Motorola Moto G34 offers reliable performance for communication-centric users. The next graph compares the battery consumption of the Motorola Moto G34 (dark blue) and the Samsung Galaxy A15 (orange). Although classed as a Mid Tier (€200-€499) smartphone, the Samsung Galaxy A15 price has been reduced, making it a strong contender to the Motorola Moto G34 on battery performance. The Samsung Galaxy A15 generally exhibits better battery efficiency in social media, gaming, and multimedia tasks, which aligns with its higher overall battery performance score. This efficiency means that the Galaxy A15 can handle intensive usage without depleting the battery quickly, making it ideal for users with heavy multimedia and social media usage. Meanwhile, the Motorola Moto G34 shows strengths in communication-related tasks, consuming less battery for outgoing calls and MMS. This makes it a reliable option for users prioritising calling and messaging over other activities. In conclusion, while the Samsung Galaxy A15 offers better battery efficiency in several key areas, the Motorola Moto G34 performs efficiently in communication tasks. Users who engage more in social media, gaming, and multimedia would benefit from the Samsung Galaxy A15's optimised power management. People who primarily use their phones for communication might find the Motorola Moto G34 more aligned with their needs. Finally, the last graph compares the overall battery efficiency of the Motorola Moto G34, the Samsung Galaxy A15, and the Xiaomi Redmi 13C enabling potential buyers to choose the best smartphone based on their usage patterns.   Also, the Entry Tier average has been included as a set benchmark that most smartphones strive to meet. The Xiaomi Redmi 13C offers the best overall battery efficiency and low energy consumption, suitable for heavy and varied usage. The Samsung Galaxy A15 offers optimised performance for multimedia tasks, making it ideal for entertainment-focused users. The Motorola Moto G34 is well-suited for communication efficiency, catering well to users who prioritise calling and messaging, providing a balanced yet specific approach to battery management. 4.   Battery Efficiency Battery efficiency refers to a smartphone's ability to maximise its battery capacity, allowing the device to run longer on a single charge. A battery-efficient phone consumes minimal power during regular usage, maximising the time between charges. The chart provides an insightful comparison of battery efficiency among the Motorola Moto G34 , Samsung Galaxy A15, Xiaomi Redmi 13C, and the Entry Tier average. All three smartphones achieve a battery efficiency score of 1.5. This performance significantly surpasses the Entry Tier average of 1.36, indicating that these manage power consumption more effectively than their average devices in the Entry Tier. This efficiency translates into practical benefits, such as a reduced need for frequent charging and potentially longer battery lifespan, which are crucial for users seeking dependable performance from their smartphones. Also, the uniform high-efficiency score is a testament to the advanced power management capabilities of these Entry Tier smartphones. 5.   Annual Energy Consumption The Xiaomi Redmi 13C stands out as the most energy-efficient phone with an annual energy consumption of 2.9 kWh. This figure is lower than both the Motorola Moto G34 and the Samsung Galaxy A15, each consuming 3.1 kWh annually, and significantly better than the Entry Tier average of 3.2 kWh. The lower energy consumption of the Redmi 13C translates into reduced electricity costs over the phone's lifespan, making it an economically attractive option for budget-conscious users. The Motorola Moto G34  and Samsung Galaxy A15 also demonstrate commendable efficiency, outperforming the Entry Tier average and providing users with reliable and economical options. VISERMARK VERDICT Motorola Moto G34 - what's it like to use? The Motorola Moto G34 offers a reliable performance with commendable strengths in communication tasks such as outgoing calls, MMS, and SMS. Its efficient battery management in these areas makes it a strong contender for users who want to stay connected through voice and text. However, the Moto G34 falls short in multimedia and gaming activities, where it demonstrates higher battery consumption compared to the Xiaomi Redmi 13C and Samsung Galaxy A15. Despite this, it provides a decent battery life of up to 53 hours, which is slightly above the Entry Tier average, ensuring that users can rely on it for two days of use for regular daily activities. In terms of overall battery performance, the Motorola Moto G34 scores slightly below the Entry Tier average, indicating room for improvement in power management, especially during high-demand tasks like gaming and video streaming. Nevertheless, its consistent performance in communication-related tasks and a manageable charging time of 2 hours 58 minutes make it a practical choice for users whose primary needs involve frequent calling and messaging. While it may not be the top performer in multimedia efficiency, the Moto G34's strengths in other areas provide a balanced and functional smartphone experience suitable for everyday use. Pros Cons Efficient battery consumption for outgoing calls, MMS, and SMS Higher battery consumption for social media, gaming, and multimedia tasks Above-average battery life with up to 53 hours of use Lower overall battery performance score compared to competitors Reliable performance for communication-centric users Not the best choice for heavy multimedia and gaming users Manageable charging time of approximately 2 hours 58 minutes. Who should buy the Motorola Moto G34? 1. Communication-Centric Users The Motorola Moto G34 excels in battery efficiency for communication tasks such as outgoing calls, MMS, and SMS. This makes it ideal for professionals, business users, or anyone who relies heavily on voice calls and text messaging. Its optimised power consumption ensures users can stay connected throughout the day without frequent recharges, crucial for those often on the go or in situations where charging facilities are not readily available. 2. Moderate Usage Individuals For users with moderate usage patterns, covering essential tasks like browsing, emailing, and light multimedia consumption, the Motorola Moto G34 provides balanced performance and a battery life of up to 53 hours, slightly above the Entry Tier average. 3. Budget-Conscious Consumers The Motorola Moto G34 is an affordable Entry Tier smartphone that delivers reliable performance. Budget-conscious users will find it compelling for its essential features and battery efficiency without a premium price tag, making it practical for students, retirees, or anyone looking to maximise value for money. CONCLUSION This smartphone is perfect for users who need to communicate and are looking for a reliable, budget-friendly smartphone for everyday use. Its efficient battery management, overall performance, and affordability make it a strong contender in the entry-tier segment. Though not ideal for heavy multimedia and gaming, the Motorola Moto G34 delivers solid value and dependable performance for its target users. VCX (Valued Camera eXperience) The VCX Forum  has been working with its members on the system and infrastructure as a non-profit organisation. We strive to improve our technology to develop and exchange accurate and objective quality and performance indicators, which is our ultimate goal. We will also serve as a compass for the smartphone camera industry. We appreciate your interest in the VCX Forum. No VCX reviews are available for this smartphone. Background Motorola  is a well-established and innovative technology company known for its contributions to the telecommunications industry. Founded in 1928, Motorola has a rich history of pioneering achievements, including the development of the first handheld mobile phone. Today, the company continues to produce a wide range of consumer electronics, with a focus on smartphones that offer reliable performance, innovative features, and value for money. Motorola's smartphones are known for their durability, user-friendly interfaces, and strong battery life, making them a popular choice for consumers worldwide. Written By Debbie Bouffler is the Marketing and Communications Manager at SmartViser . She is crucial in developing the company's communication and marketing strategies. Debbie has gained extensive experience in strategic business development and marketing in various industries, which has helped her excel in her current position. Debbie is a leader with imagination, an unmatched drive, and an infectious passion for growth and excellence, especially in the telecommunications industry. Our Resources ViserMark Scores ViserMark Reviews Success Stories Latest Articles Discover what ViserMark is all about. Read ViserMark's latest in-depth smartphone battery reviews. Discover our main success stories with Telecoms and other industries. Read more articles on our battery life and performance reviews and all the latest test results.

SMARTPHONE TIER: MID TIER Battery Capacity mAh: 4500 Honor 200 Lite Smartphone Review: Honor 200 Lite: Power-Efficient Performance in a Sleek Package SMARTPHONE BATTERY PERFORMANCE Based on Price: Mid (€200-€499)  Entry Tier Ranking # 4 Learn more: Quick Summary ViserMark Labels Specifications Know the Test Results ViserMark Verdict Video Review Quick Summary Earlier this year, Honor introduced the Honor 200 series, featuring the premium Honor 200 Pro , the standard Honor 200 , and the budget-friendly Honor 200 Lite . ViserMark has conducted an in-depth analysis of the Honor 200 Lite , revealing intriguing battery test results and comparisons with other Mid Tier smartphones. The Honor 200 Lite combines sleek design with power-efficient performance, making it an excellent choice for budget-conscious users. With a vibrant 6.7-inch AMOLED display, advanced Mediatek Dimensity 6080 chipset, and an impressive camera setup featuring a 108MP main sensor, this smartphone delivers exceptional value. Its standout feature is its 2 days of use battery life, with an annual energy consumption of just 2.9 kWh, ensuring long-lasting usage across various tasks. Despite slightly higher power consumption for social media and calls, the Honor 200 Lite excels in overall functionality, making it a compelling Mid Tier option. Pros Cons Light-weight and has a thin, drop-resistant design 90Hz refresh rate Excellent battery life - 2 days of use No micro-slot or 3.5mm Jack Affordable mobile phone No charger in the box Good camera set-up Bright AMOLED display     ViserMark Labels for the Honor 200 Lite Based on the ViserMark test results provided for the Honor 200 Lite , here’s a detailed breakdown of the battery performance translated into ViserMark Labels. The Honor 200 Lite  showcases an impressive battery life, lasting over two days on a single charge, making it an excellent choice for users seeking long-lasting performance. It balances convenience and battery longevity with a reasonable charging time of just over two hours. However, its overall battery performance score is average, indicating potential areas for improvement in power management and efficiency. Despite this, this smartphone maintains a good annual energy consumption, making it energy-efficient. The Honor 200 Lite is a strong contender for those prioritising battery life, offering durability and reliability for everyday use. Specification Overview  - Released Date: April 2024 Body: 161.5 x 74.5 x 6.7 mm, weight 166g Display : AMOLED 6.7 inch screen, 90Hz with 1080 x 2412 pixels, IP52 rating water-repellent and Dual SIM (Nano-SIM) Operating System : Android 14 and MagicOS 8 Chipset :   Mediatek Dimensity 6080 (6 nm), Octa-core processor Memory : 256GB 8GB RAM Connectivity :  Wi-Fi 802.11a/b/g/n / ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct . Bluetooth: Yes. NFC: Yes. Loudspeaker: Yes. 3.5mm Jack: No Camera : Triple set-up - Main: 108MP (wide) 5 MP (ultra-wide) and 2 MP (macro) with LED flash, HDR. Video1080p@30fps Front Camera:  50 MP (wide). LED Flash and Video 1080p@30fps Battery : 4500 mAh, 35W wired Colour : Starry Blue, Cyan Lake, Black   Discover all the Battery Performance Test Results Learn more about the Honor 200 Lite Smartphone Battery Performance - HOW WE TEST ViserMark  offers a comprehensive range of battery performance test results based on different criteria and benchmarks for evaluating a smartphone's performance. Our tests are performed using the strictest protocol in a controlled environment to ensure repetition and consistency powered by SmartViser's test automation solution viSer . VWS Analytics Studio  is a complementary product to the viSer Test Automation solution. It enhances the viSer user experience and is the fastest way to analyse and view smartphone test results. We have used the interactive dashboard to show you the recent test results and translated them into ViserMark Labels. Discover all the Battery Test Results Learn more about the Honor 200 Lite Join our readers to receive the latest update to our smartphone battery performance scores and performance reviews as soon as we finish testing!   Smartphone Battery Performance - FULL TEST RESULTS AND REVIEW ViserMark has put the Honor 200 Lite  through our testing protocol, based on real smartphone usage from 100% battery level down to power off. This includes daily activities, such as calls, web, video and music streaming, gaming, social networks, picture and video capture, and standby. All activities are executed in a defined order and timeline. These test results, show how the Honor 200 Lite  performed and the scores achieved. 1. Battery Performance Here's the Battery Performance score for the Honor 200 Lite. The Honor 200 Lite is a strong performer in the Mid Tier smartphone category, especially regarding battery performance. This places it on par with the Realme Narzo 50 , which scored 46 and was released in March 2022. Despite being an older model, the Realme Narzo 50 remains competitive, showing that it still holds up well in terms of battery efficiency. The Samsung Galaxy A55 slightly outperforms both with a score of 47. Compared to the average battery performance score of 45 for Mid Tier smartphones, the Honor 200 Lite  and its competitors slightly surpass this benchmark, indicating that these devices are optimised better than the average smartphone in their category. 2. Battery Life Let's see the Honor 200 Lite test results. As shown in the battery life comparison charts, the Honor 200 Lite provides an impressive 51 hours of usage, translating into 2 Days of Usage. This performance is superior to the Samsung Galaxy A55 , which offers 49 hours (approximately 2 days), and the Realme Narzo 50 , which delivers 45 hours (approximately 2 days). This extended battery life makes the Honor 200 Lite an ideal choice for users who need a dependable device for long periods without frequent recharging. Remarkably, the Honor 200 Lite achieves this with a 4500mAh battery, while its competitors, the Samsung Galaxy A55 and Realme Narzo 50 , feature larger 5000mAh batteries. This efficiency highlights the superior optimisation and power management of the Honor 200 Lite , enabling it to outperform other smartphones with greater battery capacities. Compared to the average battery consumption for Mid Tier smartphones, which stands at 47 hours or about 1.84 days, the Honor 200 Lite surpasses this benchmark. This robust battery performance ensures that users can comfortably rely on the Honor 200 Lite for extended daily use, making it a standout option in its price range for those who prioritise battery longevity. 3.   Battery Consumption The  Honor 200 Lite  battery life details, as analysed using SmartViser's  viSer and VWS Analytics Studio , provide a technical and detailed perspective on the smartphone's battery consumption. The platform's capability to monitor and access real-time test results explains how it manages power under various daily user tasks. The detailed battery consumption comparison between the Honor 200 Lite and the Realme Narzo 50, as depicted in the graph, reveals how each phone manages power across various daily tasks. Despite being released two years prior, the Realme Narzo 50 demonstrates competitive battery performance, but the Honor 200 Lite stands out in specific areas, showcasing superior efficiency. The Honor 200 Lite consumes significantly more power for social media and outgoing calls compared to the Realme Narzo 50. This indicates that these activities are more power-intensive on the Honor 200 Lite. In tasks such as MMS and email, the Honor 200 Lite uses less power than the Realme Narzo 50 . The combination of Android 14 and MagicOS 8 ensures optimised background task management, reducing unnecessary power drain during these activities. Also, the Honor 200 Lite handles power-intensive tasks like gaming and YouTube streaming with slightly better efficiency than the Narzo 50, despite only having a 90Hz refresh rate. Lastly, the Honor 200 Lite demonstrates lower power consumption during camera use and media playback. Its advanced camera setup, including a 108MP primary sensor, a 50MP front camera, and Smart AI image processing, supports this efficiency. Overall, the Realme Narzo 50 was ahead when it was released, offering a solid battery, a 120Hz display, and decent gaming performance. However, it lacks 5G support and stereo speakers, features that are becoming increasingly standard in newer models like the Honor 200 Lite. The advancements in the Honor 200 Lite , such as a more efficient chipset, improved display technology, and enhanced power management, illustrate the rapid pace of innovation in the smartphone industry. These improvements ensure that users get better performance, longer battery life, and a more seamless experience, making the Honor 200 Lite a notable example of the progress made in smartphone technology. Despite the Samsung Galaxy A55 ’s larger 5000mAh battery, the Honor 200 Lite , with its smaller 4500mAh battery, demonstrates competitive battery consumption across various tasks. Let's look into the specifics of each device and the findings from the ViserMark battery consumption test results. The Honor 200 Lite demonstrates superior power efficiency across various daily tasks compared to the Samsung Galaxy A55 . In social media and web browsing activities, the Honor 200 Lite shows lower current consumption, highlighting its better power management. Its 6.7-inch AMOLED display with a 90Hz refresh rate and the Mediatek Dimensity 6080 chipset support this efficiency, ensuring prolonged battery life and smooth performance. For more power-intensive tasks like gaming and streaming YouTube videos, the Galaxy A55's power consumption is higher. This is due to its 6.6-inch Super AMOLED display with a 120Hz refresh rate and HDR10+ support, which, while delivering superior visuals, also demands more power. The Honor 200 Lite , with its efficient hardware and software integration, maintains superior power management during these high-demand tasks, making it a more power-efficient choice. Outperforming the Samsung Galaxy A55 in camera use and media playback, the Honor 200 Lite consumes less power during these activities. Its advanced camera setup, including a 108MP primary sensor, a 50MP front camera, and Smart AI image processing, contributes to this efficiency. Overall, the Honor 200 Lite boasts advanced power management and efficient specifications. These technological advancements reflect the rapid pace of innovation in smartphone technology, promising users better performance, longer battery life, and a seamless experience. On the other hand, the Samsung Galaxy A55   offers robust hardware and a superior display, making it a compelling choice for users seeking high performance. However, it does come with higher power consumption in specific tasks. The ViserMark battery consumption comparison provides an in-depth look at how the Honor 200 Lite performs relative to the Realme Narzo 50, the Samsung Galaxy A55, and the average Mid Tier smartphone. The Honor 200 Lite demonstrates a balanced power efficiency across various tasks compared to the Realme Narzo 50 and Samsung Galaxy A55 . Despite having a smaller 4500mAh battery, the Honor 200 Lite consumes less power for MMS, gaming, file transfer, media playback, SMS, email, and web browsing. This efficiency is attributed to its optimised hardware and software integration. In contrast, the Realme Narzo 50 , with its larger 5000mAh battery, consumes more power in most tasks except for social media and outgoing calls, which is more efficient than the Honor 200 Lite . The Samsung Galaxy A55, while showcasing advanced features like a 120Hz Super AMOLED display and a high-performance Exynos 1480 chipset, has the highest power consumption in several areas, especially in social media and outgoing calls. However, it performs better in camera use than the Honor 200 Lite. Finally, in most daily tasks, the Honor 200 Lite stands out for its superior power efficiency. When compared to the Realme Narzo 50 and Samsung Galaxy A55 , both of which exhibit higher power consumption in several tasks, it is evident that the Honor 200 Lite offers a better balance of performance and efficiency for everyday use. 4.   Battery Efficiency When comparing battery performance among Mid Tier smartphones, the Honor 200 Lite , Realme Narzo 50, and Samsung Galaxy A55 reveal significant differences in efficiency and power management. Here are the test results for the Honor 200 Lite. The Honor 200 Lite stands out with an efficiency rating of 1.50 leaves, surpassing both the Realme Narzo 50 and the Samsung Galaxy A55 , each with a rating of 1.00 leaves. The average Mid Tier smartphone has an efficiency rating of 1.11 leaves, indicating that the Honor 200 Lite is well above the average in terms of battery performance. 5.   Annual Energy Consumption The Honor 200 Lite stands out with the lowest annual energy consumption at 2.9 kWh, making it the most energy-efficient device among the compared smartphones. This lower energy consumption is a testament to the Honor 200 Lite 's enhanced power management and efficient hardware and software integration. In contrast, both the Realme Narzo 50 and the Samsung Galaxy A55 have an annual energy consumption of 3.3 kWh. While they are slightly better than the average Mid Tier smartphone consumption of 3.5 kWh, they still consume more energy annually compared to the Honor 200 Lite . This indicates that while both devices offer competitive features and performance, they do so at the cost of higher energy usage. The Samsung Galaxy A55 , with its advanced features, demands more power, contributing to its higher annual consumption. Similarly, the Realme Narzo 50 , despite its larger 5000mAh battery, does not manage energy as efficiently as the Honor 200 Lite. The Honor 200 Lite excels in annual energy consumption, making it the most energy-efficient choice among the Mid Tier smartphones. Its power management ensures that users benefit from lower energy usage, translating to potentially lower costs and a more environmentally friendly device. ViserMark VERDICT Honor 200 Lite - what's it like to use? This smartphone delivers a well-rounded user experience, balancing performance, efficiency, and functionality. Despite its smaller 4500mAh battery, the Honor 200 Lite excels in power management, providing impressive 2-day battery life across various tasks. Whether browsing social media, streaming videos on YouTube, or engaging in multimedia activities, the Honor 200 Lite handles these tasks quickly and reliably. The Honor 200 Lite demonstrates lower power consumption for tasks like MMS, gaming, file transfers, and media playback than its competitors. For instance, gaming and video playback consume less power, ensuring users enjoy prolonged sessions without worrying about battery drain. Its camera setup, featuring a 108MP primary sensor and a 50MP front camera, also provides high-quality photos and videos. The phone's sleek design and lightweight build make it comfortable to hold and use for extended periods. Furthermore, its impressive annual energy consumption of just 2.9 kWh highlights its efficiency and sustainability, appealing to eco-conscious users. Pros Cons Lower power consumption for MMS, gaming, file transfers, and media playback. Consumes more power for social media and outgoing calls Excellent battery life - 2 days or 51 hours 90Hz refresh rate is lower than some competitors High-quality display Slower than average charging time Good camera performance Who should buy the Honor 200 Lite? The Honor 200 Lite is an excellent choice for a variety of users, especially those who want battery efficiency, display quality, and camera performance. Eco-Conscious Users: With the lowest annual energy consumption at just 2.9 kWh among its competitors, the Honor 200 Lite appeals to users who are mindful of their environmental impact and prefer energy-efficient devices. Photography Enthusiasts: The high-quality 108MP primary camera and 50MP front camera make the Honor 200 Lite an excellent option for those who love taking photos and videos. Advanced image processing and camera software ensure crisp, vibrant images are produced every time. Heavy Multimedia Users: Suppose you frequently watch videos, play games, or listen to music on your phone. In that case, the Honor 200 Lite’s efficient power management for media playback and gaming will ensure you can enjoy these activities longer without worrying about battery drain. Budget-Conscious Buyers: For budget-conscious buyers, the Honor 200 Lite is a smart investment in the €200-€499 price range. It offers a compelling combination of performance, battery life, and advanced features, delivering excellent value for money. CONCLUSION As a well-rounded Mid Tier smartphone, the Honor 200 Lite excels in battery efficiency, camera performance, and overall functionality. It offers efficient performance making it a compelling choice for anyone seeking a reliable, feature-rich smartphone with exceptional value. VCX (Valued Camera eXperience) The VCX Forum  has been working with its members on the system and infrastructure as a non-profit organisation. We strive to improve our technology to develop and exchange accurate and objective quality and performance indicators, which is our ultimate goal. We will also serve as a compass for the smartphone camera industry. We appreciate your interest in the VCX Forum. No VCX reviews are available for this smartphone.   Background Established in 2013, HONOR is a leading global provider of smart devices, committed to becoming an iconic tech brand that enables a smart life for all people, across all scenarios and channels. With over 13,000 employees, more than 60% of whom are dedicated to research and development, HONOR focuses on innovation, quality, and service. The brand's extensive R&D capabilities and forward-looking technology empower people worldwide to achieve more. HONOR's impressive portfolio of innovative products and a vast retail presence with over 45,000 stores support more than 200 million active devices, creating a new intelligent world for everyone. Written By Debbie Bouffler is the Marketing and Communications Manager at SmartViser . She is crucial in developing the company's communication and marketing strategies. Debbie has gained extensive experience in strategic business development and marketing in various industries, which has helped her excel in her current position. Debbie is a leader with imagination, an unmatched drive, and an infectious passion for growth and excellence, especially in the telecommunications industry. Our Resources ViserMark Scores ViserMark Reviews Success Stories Latest Articles Discover what ViserMark is all about. Read ViserMark's latest in-depth smartphone battery reviews. Discover our main success stories with Telecoms and other industries. Read more articles on our battery life, performance reviews, and the latest test results. Know more Know more Know more Know more

"When every millisecond counts, having the right device can mean the difference between victory and defeat." The gaming landscape is evolving, and so are the devices we use to play. Whether engaging in high-stakes games like Fortnite or PUBG or exploring expansive open-world games like Genshin Impact , your smartphone's performance, battery life, and display quality are essential for an immersive experience. In this article, ViserMark explores the best gaming smartphones of 2024 that have been tested to date, breaking down their key features and helping you find the perfect match for your gaming needs. ViserMark's Top Picks for Best Smartphones for Gaming SAMSUNG GALAXY S24 ULTRA - (Flagship/Pro €700 +) The Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra is powered by a Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset and is supported by a high-end GPU known for excellent gaming performance. It supports advanced graphics rendering techniques, higher frame rates, and better power efficiency. Also, it can handle demanding games with high graphics settings smoothly and hardware-accelerated ray tracing, enhancing realistic lighting, shadows, and reflections in games. Its 6.8-inch Dynamic AMOLED 2X display ensures vibrant colours, deep blacks, and excellent contrast, offering an immersive visual experience. Also, it has incredibly sharp and detailed visuals.are delivered by the QHD+ (1440 x 3200 pixels) resolution. QHD+ resolution and a 120Hz adaptive refresh rate ensure stunning visuals and smooth gameplay. The Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra also benefits from advanced gaming features, such as Samsung’s Game Booster , which optimises performance by managing system resources, HDR10+ support and an enhanced cooling system to maintain performance during extended gaming sessions. Read the Full Review >> GOOGLE PIXEL 8 PRO - (Flagship/Pro €700 +) The Google Pixel 8 Pro features a powerful Google Tensor G3 chipset that delivers seamless gaming performance. It also has a powerful GPU and offers robust gaming performance, supporting high graphics settings and smooth gameplay. It is capable of running most modern mobile games efficiently but may not match the highest performance tiers of the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra. The QHD+ (1344 x 2992 pixels) resolution further enhances the gaming experience with sharp and detailed visuals. The 6.7-inch OLED Super Actua display provides rich colours, deep blacks, and high contrast, making games look vibrant and lifelike. The 120Hz refresh rate enhances smooth animations and gameplay making it ideal for gamers. It's worth noting that Google's AI optimisations, including the advanced thermal management system, prevent overheating and maintain optimal performance enhancing gaming performance and graphics. Read the Full Review >> Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra and Google Pixel 8 Pro provide exceptional gaming experiences with their high-end specifications, efficient battery consumption, and fast charging capabilities. Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra has a slight advantage in battery efficiency, gaming time, charging speed, and GPU performance, making it the better choice for gamers who prioritise these aspects. However, the Google Pixel 8 Pro still excels with its high-quality display and solid gaming performance, Still, its higher battery drain rate and slower charging speed make it slightly less optimal for extended gaming sessions than the S24 Ultra. For gamers prioritising the absolute best in graphics performance and efficient power management, the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra is the better choice. The Google Pixel 8 Pro remains a strong contender with its excellent display and gaming capabilities but falls slightly behind in battery efficiency and charging speed. GOOGLE PIXEL 8a - (High Tier €500-€699) The Google Pixel 8a offers a good balance of performance and price. It features a Google Tensor G3 chipset and GPU designed for Mid to High Tier phones. It supports advanced graphics rendering and should handle most modern mobile games well. Its 6.1-inch OLED HDR display, with a 1080 x 2440 pixels resolution, provides vibrant colours, deep blacks, and good contrast. A 90Hz refresh rate provides a smooth display, ideal for gaming. Also, it may need more advanced gaming optimisations found in flagship devices and can't match the high-end graphics performance and display quality of the Samsung Galaxy S23 FE. Read the Full Review >> SAMSUNG GALAXY S23 FE - (High Tier €500-€699) The Samsung Galaxy S23 FE is a solid option for gamers on a budget. It offers reliable performance with a balanced chipset found in Flagship Tier smartphones, superior graphics performance, higher frame rates, and better support for advanced graphics features. The 6.4-inch Dynamic AMOLED 2X, display offers excellent colour accuracy, high brightness, and deep contrast. A 120Hz refresh rate provides an even smoother gaming experience but at the cost of higher power consumption. The S23 FE benefits from Samsung's Game Booster and other gaming features, which optimise performance and graphics rendering during gameplay. Read the Full Review >> Google Pixel 8a offers better battery performance and efficiency for gaming, providing longer gaming sessions on a single charge. Its efficient power management makes it a more reliable option for extended gaming without frequent recharging. On the other hand, the Samsung Galaxy S23 FE offers a higher refresh rate and a more powerful processor, which can enhance the gaming experience with smoother graphics and faster performance. However, this comes at the cost of higher power consumption and shorter gaming duration per charge. For gamers prioritising longer battery life and efficient power usage, the Google Pixel 8a is the better choice. For those who value higher refresh rates and more powerful performance, the Samsung Galaxy S23 FE might be more appealing despite its shorter battery life. HONOR 200 LITE - (Mid Tier €200-€499) The Honor 200 Lite provides good performance for gaming and everyday use. It features the MediaTek Dimensity 6080 processor, which provides a decent gaming experience for Mid Tier phones. The 90Hz display ensures smooth visuals, enhancing the gaming experience and the 6.7-inch AMOLED display with 1080 x 2412 resolution offers a respectable visual experience. It shows a slightly higher battery drain during gaming than the OPPO A78 5G, but it is still within acceptable limits for Mid Tier smartphones. Read the Full Review >> OPPO A78 5G - (Mid Tier €200-€499) The OPPO A78 5G is a great option for budget-conscious gamers. Like the Honor 200 Lite, it features the lower-end Mediatek Dimensity 700 processor. Even with a slightly lower resolution display of 720 x 1612 pixels, the OPPO A78 performs surprising ly well in gaming and is below the Mid Tier smartphone average for battery consumption during gaming. The 6.5-inch HD+ display provides a satisfactory visual experience. The battery consumption during gaming shows a marginally better battery efficiency, likely due to the lower resolution display. Also, faster charging capabilities provide a more seamless and less interrupted gaming experience. Read the Full Revie w >> The Honor 200 Lite and OPPO A78 5G offer competitive gaming performance in the Mid Tier market, powered by MediaTek Dimensity processors. The Honor 200 Lite has a larger 5000mAh battery, ensuring extended gaming sessions and has a slight edge in battery efficiency. Still, the OPPO A78 5G despite the smaller 4500mAh battery has faster charging times. Honor 200 Lite  has an advantage when it comes to gaming graphics due to its higher resolution display (FHD+). This will result in more precise and detailed visuals during gaming, enhancing the overall gaming experience. The OPPO A78 5G, with its lower resolution (HD+), will not provide the same level of detail. However, due to the lower pixel load on the GPU, it may benefit from reduced power consumption and potentially smoother performance. For users prioritising battery life and quick recharging, the OPPO A78 5G may be the better choice. However, the Honor 200 Lite also provides a robust gaming experience with its high-resolution display, making it a strong contender in this category. However, both smartphones are well-suited for gaming and the differences are not drastic enough to severely impact casual gaming. MOTOROLA MOTO G24 - (Entry Tier €0-€199) The Motorola Moto G24 is a solid entry-level gaming phone with a Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 chipset for casual gaming and everyday tasks. Its 6.5-inch LCD display offers a decent visual experience with a 720 x 1612 pixels resolution. The battery performance is rated the highest at 55/100, with efficient battery consumption during gaming. It offers a longer battery life of 61 hours, slightly higher than the Xiaomi Redmi 13C's 57 hours. The Motorola Moto G24 has a higher battery consumption rate during gaming. Users may need to manage their gaming sessions or have a charger handy for longer playtimes. However, the extended battery life provides more flexibility for daily use. Read the Full Review >> XIAOMI REDMI 13C - (Entry Tier €0-€199) The Xiaomi Redmi 13C provides excellent value for entry-level gamers. It also features a MediaTek Helio G85 chipset that handles casual gaming and daily tasks efficiently. The larger 6.7-inch LCD display offers a satisfactory visual experience. It demonstrates better battery consumption efficiency during gaming compared to the Motorola Moto G24. This suggests that the Xiaomi device may last longer during gaming sessions, which benefits gamers who prefer extended play without interruptions. The lower battery consumption during gaming makes the Xiaomi Redmi 13C more suitable for extended gaming sessions. Its higher battery efficiency also ensures that users get more gaming time from each charge, making it a more attractive option for gamers. Read the Full Review >> Both the Motorola Moto G24 and Xiaomi Redmi 13C are excellent choices for Entry Tier gaming smartphones, with strong battery performance. The Xiaomi Redmi 13C holds a slight advantage in battery efficiency and overall gaming time, making it a marginally better choice for extended gaming sessions. However, the Motorola Moto G24 provides a robust battery life and fast charging capabilities, ensuring a reliable gaming experience. For users looking for the best gaming performance within this budget, there may be better choices than the 90Hz refresh rate for high-end gaming. However, the Xiaomi Redmi 13C might be the preferable option due to its slight edge in battery efficiency. However, both phones will serve gamers well with their competitive specs and gaming features. Key Highlights and Insights This analysis evaluates the smartphone gaming performance and battery consumption across different price tiers: Entry, Mid, High, and Flagship. High-End Graphics Performance: The Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra  offers superior graphics performance with its Adreno 740 GPU, which supports advanced features like hardware-accelerated ray tracing. This makes it the best choice for gamers prioritising high-end graphics and smooth gameplay. Balanced Performance and Efficiency: The Google Pixel 8a  in the High Tier category perfectly balances performance and battery efficiency. Its Google Tensor G3 processor provides a robust gaming experience, making it an excellent option for extended gaming sessions. Entry-Tier Efficiency: The Xiaomi Redmi 13C  demonstrates that Entry Tier smartphones can offer good gaming performance with efficient power consumption. Its longer gaming sessions make it a compelling choice for budget gamers, highlighting the advancements in Entry Tier smartphone technology. Impact of Display Quality on Gaming Experience: The Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra  and Google Pixel 8 Pro  both feature QHD+ displays with a 120Hz refresh rate, enhancing the gaming experience with smooth and vibrant visuals. This underscores the importance of display quality in delivering an immersive gaming experience. Summary Our analysis uncovers some fascinating insights across different smartphone tiers. The Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra takes the lead in the Flagship Tier with its unparalleled graphics performance and efficient battery usage. In the high-tier segment, the Google Pixel 8a strikes a perfect balance between performance and battery life. The OPPO A78 5G shines in the Mid Tier category with its outstanding battery efficiency, while the Xiaomi Redmi 13C is a standout in the Entry Tier for its efficient power consumption and decent gaming performance. These findings highlight the advancements in smartphone technology across various price ranges, offering gamers multiple options based on their specific needs and budget. Ready to elevate your gaming experience? Choose from one of these top gaming smartphones to find the perfect fit for your gaming needs. Remember to subscribe to our mailing list for more insights and reviews on the latest smartphone battery reviews! Written By: Debbie Bouffler is the Marketing and Communications Manager at Smart V iser . She plays a crucial role in developing the company's communication and marketing strategies. Debbie has gained extensive experience in strategic business development and marketing in various industries, which has helped her excel in her current position. Debbie is a leader with imagination, an unmatched drive, and an infectious passion for growth and excellence, especially in the telecommunications industry. For further insights into her professional journey or to connect, visit Debbie on LinkedIn .  At Viser Mark , we pride ourselves on our rigorous and meticulous testing protocols. Our tests are conducted in real-time conditions to provide accurate and reliable results. Simulating everyday usage scenarios and intensive gaming sessions ensures that our battery performance and consumption data reflect actual user experiences. This thorough approach lets you make well-informed decisions when choosing a smartphone, knowing that our evaluations are grounded in practical, real-world applications - Trust ViserMark for unbiased and comprehensive assessments of the latest smartphones.

In today's digital age, ensuring the well-being of children amidst the omnipresence of screens has become a paramount concern. The ubiquity of digital devices like smartphones, tablets, and computers has raised significant concerns about their impact on children's mental and physical health. France has embarked on a comprehensive initiative to safeguard young minds from the potential harms of excessive screen time. Current Government Actions to Avoid Excessive Screen Time for Children France has taken significant steps to protect children online by enacting Law No. 2022-300 in March 2022 . This law mandated installing parental control systems on all internet-enabled devices sold in France, to block access to harmful content. While awaiting new laws, France has already implemented several measures to curb screen time: Parental Control Defaults : From July 2024 onwards, every internet-enabled device sold in France must come with pre-installed parental controls. These controls, available at device activation, are a critical component of the 2022 legislation aimed at protecting children from inappropriate online content. School Regulations : Existing laws prohibit mobile phone use in nurseries, primary, and lower secondary schools during teaching activities, though enforcement varies. Social Media Age Verification : France requires social media platforms to verify users' ages and obtain parental consent for those under 15. This is part of a broader effort to establish a 'digital majority' age of 15 across Europe. Tech Industry Response The tech industry, particularly Google, has responded proactively to these regulatory changes. Google intends to leverage its Family Link parental controls and enhance its Digital Wellbeing app to comply with French regulations. These updates will allow parents to set PIN-protected time limits and control app usage, reinforcing the protective measures mandated by French law. Apple is enhancing its Screen Time feature, providing parents with more granular controls over app usage and downtime. Samsung has also committed to integrating comprehensive parental control systems in their devices sold in France, ensuring compliance with the new laws. Notably, the Chinese government's stricter regulations on screen time for minors have influenced global manufacturers to adopt more robust parental controls. In China, minors are restricted to a maximum of two hours per day online, with even stricter limits for younger children. These measures have prompted manufacturers to develop more advanced tools to help parents manage screen time effectively. Google Family Link Google's Family Link app is a cornerstone of the tech giant's approach to helping parents manage their children's digital use. The app allows parents to create Google accounts for their children under 13, which are monitored by the parents' accounts. Parents can manage apps, monitor screen time, and set device bedtime hours. This app is particularly crucial in France's new regulatory environment, offering a straightforward way for parents to comply with the law's requirements. Recommendations and Proposed Measures Recognising the pervasive influence of digital devices on young children, President Macron announced in January 2024 the formation of a task force comprising experts in addiction, education, neurology, psychology, and digital technology. Their mission was to assess the impact of screen time on children and recommend robust policy changes. By April, the task force had compiled a comprehensive report, which was leaked to various media outlets. This report underscored the "very clear consensus on the negative effects" of screen time on children. Key findings highlighted the correlation between excessive screen use and mental health issues such as anxiety and depression, especially in children with pre-existing vulnerabilities. The report also expressed concerns over children's exposure to inappropriate content. The task force's recommendations were wide-ranging and aimed at various aspects of children's digital interactions: Screen Access : No screen time for children under three years old and highly limited access between three to six years, focusing on educational content with adult supervision. Mobile Phones and Social Media : Restrict mobile phone use to devices without internet access until age 13, with a gradual introduction to ethical social media platforms like Mastodon or Bluesky at age 15, while avoiding apps like Instagram and TikTok until 18. Schools and Nurseries : Establish 'mobile-free' zones in secondary schools and experiment with 'smartphone-free' environments to assess impacts on school life and bullying. Predatory Practices : Combat addictive design features like infinite scrolling and automatic video launches that tech companies employ to capture children's attention. The Road Ahead President Macron's advocacy for a 'digital majority' age of 15 across Europe underscores the potential for these measures to influence broader European policy. By aligning national regulations with European standards, France hopes to create a safer digital environment for children continent-wide. As France implements these new regulations, the emphasis remains on continuous parental education and vigilance. Despite the robust legislative framework, the responsibility of guiding children through the digital landscape ultimately rests with parents and guardians. The government's online resources, such as the site jeprotegemonenfant.gouv.fr , provide valuable tools and information to assist parents in managing their children's screen time effectively. In conclusion, France's multi-faceted approach to protecting children from excessive screen time reflects a deep commitment to fostering a healthy digital upbringing. Through a combination of expert recommendations, legislative action, and industry collaboration, France is setting a precedent for safeguarding young minds in the digital age. Written By: Marcella Frattari  is the Digital Communications Manager at SmartViser, primarily responsible for ViserMark content creation and social media management. She holds a journalism background and is pursuing a master's degree in digital communications and marketing. Marcella brings a dynamic and creative approach to her work, consistently striving to enhance the company's online presence and engagement. Press Contact: Debbie Bouffler: Contact@visermark.com   Never miss out on our FREE Smartphone Reviews. Add  your email below to sign up for  our monthly newsletter ,   which provides all the latest mobile phones that ViserMark has tried  and tested. No pressure; you can unsubscribe anytime,  and we promise not to fill up your inbox.

As the world prepares for the upcoming Olympics, Samsung took centre stage on July 10th with its latest Galaxy Unpacked event, unveiling a suite of groundbreaking technological advancements. From the sleek Galaxy Ring to cutting-edge foldable phones and AI-powered wearables, this year's event highlighted Samsung's unwavering commitment to technological innovation. Here’s an in-depth look at all the announcements from this landmark event. Galaxy Ring: A Revolution in Wearable Tech The Galaxy Ring stole the spotlight, marking Samsung's bold entry into the smart ring market. The Galaxy Ring is a marvel of miniaturization and design. Crafted from lightweight titanium and available in gold, silver, and black, it combines durability with elegance, boasting water resistance up to 10ATM and an IP68 rating. Key Features: Health Monitoring:  Tracks sleep patterns, heart rate, respiratory rate, and menstrual cycles. Energy Score:  Uses AI to assess your readiness for the day based on sleep quality and activity levels. Seamless Integration:  Syncs with the Samsung Health app and other Galaxy devices for a cohesive user experience. Battery Life:  Lasts up to seven days on a single charge, with a quick charging case included. Price:  from 449,00€ Galaxy Z Fold 6 and Z Flip 6: The Pinnacle of Foldable Innovation Samsung's latest foldable phones, the Galaxy Z Fold 6 and Z Flip 6 have received thoughtful enhancements that refine their already impressive capabilities. Galaxy Z Fold 6: Design:  Flatter profile with squared corners, offering a more modern and durable look. Display:  Brighter screens with up to 2,600 nits, making it the brightest Galaxy Fold to date. Performance:  Powered by the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset with improved cooling through a larger vapour chamber. Battery:  Maintains a 4,400mAh battery with 25W fast charging. Durability:  Now with an IP48 rating for better protection against dust and water. AI Integration:  Features like Sketch to Image and enhanced Circle to Search capabilities for a smarter user experience. Price:  from 1.999,00€ Galaxy Z Flip 6: Camera:  Equipped with a 50MP wide sensor and a 12MP ultra-wide sensor, enhanced with AI for up to 10x zoom. Display: Interactive cover screen with more widgets and AI-generated smart replies. Performance:  Also powered by the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset, ensuring smooth performance. Durability:  The first Z Flip to feature a vapour chamber, enhancing thermal performance and longevity. Battery:  Powered by a 4,000mAh battery Price:  1.199,00€ Galaxy Watch Series: Precision Meets Durability Samsung introduced two new smartwatches designed to cater to different user needs, from everyday health monitoring to extreme outdoor activities. Galaxy Watch 7: Health Features:  Includes sleep apnea detection, heart rate monitoring, and an AGEs Index for metabolic health insights. Performance:  A new 3nm processor for faster performance and improved power efficiency. Price:  319,00 € Galaxy Watch Ultra: Design:  Rugged titanium frame with a 47mm case, built for extreme conditions. Features: Dual-frequency GPS, advanced heart rate monitoring, and an emergency siren. Battery Life:  Up to 100 hours in power-saving mode. Price:  699,00 € Galaxy Buds 3 and Buds 3 Pro: Sound Meets Intelligence The new Galaxy Buds 3 and Buds 3 Pro bring significant upgrades in both design and functionality. Design:  Stemmed design for better comfort and stability, echoing the design of Apple's AirPods. Audio Quality:  Features adaptive noise cancellation, dual amplifiers, and planar tweeters for superior sound. AI Features:  Real-time translation via the Interpreter app, facilitating communication in multiple languages. Price:  Galaxy Buds 3 from 179,00€ and Buds 3 Pro from 249,00€   Galaxy AI-Powered Enhancements: A New Era of Intelligence  Samsung’s Galaxy AI capabilities were a highlight, with features designed to make devices more intelligent and user-friendly. These AI enhancements are available on over 200 million devices, offering a seamless and intuitive user experience. Circle to Search:  This feature allows users to draw a circle around any object or text on the screen to initiate a search. The Galaxy Z Fold 6 takes this further by offering instant full-screen translation, making it incredibly useful for professionals and travellers. Circle to Learn:  Users can circle a problem or a question, such as a math problem, and receive step-by-step instructions on how to solve it. This feature promotes independent learning and problem-solving. Google Gemini Integration:  Deep integration with Google’s Gemini AI brings powerful new capabilities. Users can interact with videos in real-time, asking questions and getting answers directly from the content. Gemini can also appear as a side panel for multitasking, making it ideal for the large screens of foldable devices. Composer and Note Assist:  With Galaxy AI, composing emails or notes becomes effortless. Users can type in a simple prompt, and the AI will draft a complete, contextually relevant message. Note Assist also integrates with Voice Recorder to transcribe and summarise meetings, distinguishing between different speakers. Sketch to Image:  This feature allows users to transform rough sketches into detailed images. It’s perfect for creative professionals who want to visualize ideas quickly. The AI can also enhance photos with suggestions for improvements and artistic styles. AI in Photography:  The ProVisual engine in the Galaxy Z Flip 6 uses AI to optimise images, adjust lighting and enhance details like skin tones and facial features. The FlexCam’s Auto Zoom feature ensures the best framing for hands-free shots. Live Translate and Interpreter:  These features support real-time translation in multiple languages, making communication easier across language barriers. The Galaxy Z Flip 6 and Z Fold 6 can display translations on both main and cover screens for a more natural conversation flow. Personal Knowledge Graph:  Samsung is leveraging AI to create a personal knowledge graph for each user, learning from usage patterns to provide personalised recommendations and insights. This is integrated into the Galaxy AI dashboard, allowing users to control and customise their AI experience. Preorders and Availability  All the latest devices are now available for preorder and will start shipping on July 24th in the US and between July 17th and July 19th in Europe , depending on the country. Conclusion  The Galaxy Unpacked Summer 2024 event in Paris was a vibrant display of Samsung's unwavering dedication to technological innovation. The launch of the Galaxy Ring, Z Fold 6, Z Flip 6, and a suite of AI-enhanced devices underscored Samsung's strategic focus on blending intelligent features with sleek, robust hardware. Innovations such as the AI-driven Energy Score, real-time translation, and advanced health tracking are setting new industry benchmarks and transforming everyday user experiences. As Samsung continues to expand and refine its ecosystem, users can look forward to more seamless, intuitive, and personalised technology that significantly enhances daily life. This event solidified Samsung’s leadership in the foldable smartphone market and the wearable tech sector, heralding a future where technology is more interconnected and smarter than ever. Written By: Marcella Frattari  is the Digital Communications Manager at SmartViser, primarily responsible for ViserMark content creation and social media management. She holds a journalism background and is pursuing a master's degree in digital communications and marketing. Marcella brings a dynamic and creative approach to her work, consistently striving to enhance the company's online presence and engagement. Press Contact: Debbie Bouffler: Contact@visermark.com Subscribe for the Latest Reviews     Never miss out on our FREE Smartphone Reviews. Add  your email below to sign up for  our monthly newsletter ,   which provides all the latest mobile phones that ViserMark has tried  and tested. No pressure; you can unsubscribe anytime,  and we promise not to fill up your inbox. Subscribe for the Latest Reviews

SMARTPHONE TIER: ENTRY TIER Battery Capacity mAh: 5000 Logicom Luma Smartphone Review: A Compact and Efficient Smartphone Smartphone Battery Performance Based on Price: Entry Tier (€0-€199)  Ranking # 19 Video Review What do you need to know about the Logicome Luma? Quick Summary The Logicom Luma smartphone is an Entry Tier smartphone (€0-€199), designed to meet basic smartphone needs at an affordable price. Its compact and lightweight design makes it easy to handle and fits comfortably in pockets or small bags. The phone features a modest display and a plastic build, prioritising cost-effectiveness over premium materials and high-definition visuals. Equipped with a 1.6 GHz Octa-Core processor and minimal 4GB RAM, the Logicom Luma is best suited for light usage, such as texting, browsing, and social media. Its battery life typically lasts 1.5 days on a single charge with regular use. The camera setup is simple, making it suitable for casual photography but not for those seeking high-quality photos. The phone runs on a simplified version of Android 13, ensuring a user-friendly experience optimised for its hardware capabilities. The Logicom Luma is appealing due to its affordability, making it an ideal choice for budget-conscious users or as a secondary mobile phone. Although it may lack advanced features and robust performance and charges slowly, it still provides essential smartphone functionality at a fraction of the cost of Flagship/Pro smartphones. Specification Overview  - Released Date: August 2023 Body: 160.5 x 70 x 9.4 mm, weight 229g Display : LCD IPS Colour 6.82 inch screen with 720 x 1640 pixels resolution Operating System : Android 13 Chipset : 1.6 GHz Octa-Core. Nano Sim, Nano Sim Memory : 128GB 4GB RAM Connectivity :  Wi-Fi 802.11a/b/g/n. Bluetooth: Yes. Micro-USB: Yes. 3.5mm Jack: Yes Cameras : Main: 16 MP with LED flash, digital zoom, and autofocus. Also, includes a 5 MP wide-angle camera and a 2 MP camera. Video : 720 x 1080 px Battery : 5000 mAh Colour : Black Good Points Not-so-Good Points Compact and practical design Slow charging Good battery life - 1.5 days of use Limited on storage Affordable mobile phone Android 13 and 4G connectivity Guaranteed for 2 years No IP ratings Basic 3-camera set-up    Pricing and Availability These prices are the best from our Affiliate Partners. As an Amazon Associate, we may earn commissions from qualifying purchases from Amazon.com . You can learn more about our disclosure policy here . Smartphone Battery Performance - FULL REVIEW ViserMark  offers a comprehensive range of battery performance test results based on different criteria and benchmarks for evaluating a smartphone's performance. Our tests are performed using the strictest protocol in a controlled environment to ensure repetition and consistency powered by SmartViser's test automation solution viSer .   VWS Analytics Studio  is a complementary product to the viSer Test Automation solution and provides an enhanced viSer user experience. It is the fastest way to analyse and view smartphone test results. We have used the interactive dashboard to show you the recent test results for the Logicom Luma  and comparative smartphones.   Logicom Luma ViserMark Labels ViserMark's Battery Performance review   is based on the smartphone battery performance results obtained during testing. The ViserMark labels provide valuable insights into the Logicom Luma  battery performance. Reading this review, you can find a full breakdown of our battery performance results in these sections. Battery Performance Score Battery Life Battery Consumption   Battery Efficiency   Annual Energy Consumption Also of Interest: ViserMark Labels 1. Battery Performance What is the Logicom Luma Performance Score? The Logicom Luma achieved a ViserMark Battery Performance score of  31 out of 100. The graph below illustrates the battery performance scores of the Logicom Luma compared to other Entry Tier smartphones. The Logicom Luma scored 31 out of 100, significantly lower than the Entry Tier average score of 44. In a competitive landscape, the Xiaomi Redmi 13C leads with a score of 52, while the Xiaomi Redmi A3 scores 39. This indicates that the Logicom Luma's battery life is below average, suggesting it may require more frequent charging. This battery performance test result highlights where the Logicom Luma may need to improve for users prioritising overall battery performance when choosing their smartphone.   2. Battery Life How long will the Logicom Luma battery last? The  Logicom Luma test results indicate an awe-inspiring battery life of 1.5 days, or 39 hours , on a single charge. The two graphs compare the Logicom Luma 's battery life against the Xiaomi Redmi A3 and Redmi 13C and the average test result of previously tested Entry Tier smartphones this year. They reveal interesting trends and insights. The Logicom Luma , with its 1.5 days of use, provides sufficient battery life for basic tasks. While it may not exceed the Entry Tier average of 2 days, it still holds its ground against competitors like the Xiaomi Redmi 13C , which outperforms with an impressive 2.5 days, and the Xiaomi Redmi A3 , which matches the Logicom Luma at 1.5 days. This indicates that this smartphone is a reliable choice with a balance between battery life and affordability. Translating days into hours, the Logicom Luma  lasts 39 hours, compared to the Entry Tier average of 51 hours. The Xiaomi Redmi 13C leads with 57 hours, followed by the Xiaomi Redmi A3  at 44 hours. This further highlights the Logicom Luma's lower battery performance than its competitors, suggesting it may require more frequent charging for heavy users. One notable highlight is the consistent performance of the Xiaomi Redmi 13C , which outperforms the Entry Tier average and comparative smartphones. This battery optimisation and efficiency could be a game-changer for users prioritising battery life in their purchase decisions. The Entry Tier average of 2 days or 51 hours sets a benchmark that most smartphones strive to meet. However, it's important to note that the Logicom Luma , with its 1.5 days of use, still provides a reliable battery life for basic tasks, making it a viable option for many potential buyers. 3.  NEW  Battery Consumption Logicom Luma battery review with viSer and VWS Analytics Studio The  Logicom Luma  battery life details, as analysed using SmartViser's  viSer and VWS Analytics Studio , provide a technical and detailed perspective on the smartphone's battery consumption. The platform's capability to monitor and access real-time test results explains how the  Logicom Luma  manages power under various daily user tasks. ViserMark can identify the strengths and weaknesses of smartphones by comparing battery usage across similar devices, enabling potential buyers to choose the best smartphone based on their usage patterns. Below is a graph that provides a detailed analysis of Logicom Luma's battery consumption across various daily tasks, comparing it to the average Entry Tier smartphone. The tasks include social media, outgoing calls, MMS, gaming, file transfer, camera usage, YouTube, email, media player, SMS, and web browsing. The current (mA) used by the Logicom Luma and the entry-tier average are displayed, highlighting how efficiently the Logicom Luma manages power in different scenarios. Social Media and Communication The Logicom Luma consumes more power for social media and outgoing calls than the average for Entry Tier phones. People who use social media frequently or make many calls may find that the battery drains faster. Younger users, especially teenagers and adults active on social media, may have issues with this higher power consumption. Media and Gaming In tasks such as gaming and media playback (YouTube and media player), the Logicom Luma again shows higher power consumption than the Entry Tier average. This is particularly relevant for avid gamers, as gaming is a power-intensive activity, and the higher consumption of Logicom Luma here suggests there may be better choices for them. Similarly, for media consumption, the higher power draw implies shorter usage times for watching videos or listening to music before recharging. This trend might influence users who rely heavily on their phones for entertainment to consider alternative mobile phones with better battery efficiency. Messaging and File Transfer This smartphone performs close to the average for Entry Tier phones in tasks such as MMS, file transfer, and SMS. However, it still shows a slightly higher current draw. This suggests that while the Logicom Luma is relatively efficient in handling these tasks, there is still room for improvement. Users who heavily engage in messaging and file transfers, such as business professionals or those who frequently communicate for work, may find the battery life adequate. Camera and Web Browsing The Logicom Luma consumes significantly more power when using the camera and browsing the web. This issue is particularly noticeable when using the camera, as it uses more energy. Users who frequently use the camera or browse the web may need to restrict their usage to prevent the battery from draining quickly. This trend could impact users who enjoy photography or rely heavily on their phones for web browsing, which may lead them to consider other more suitable mobile phones with better battery performance. Overall, the Logicom Luma generally consumes more power than the average Entry Tier phone across various tasks. This suggests that although it can handle everyday activities, other more power-efficient options are available. Users who value more extended battery life should consider this when considering the Logicom Luma. Also, the higher power consumption during tasks such as social media, gaming, and camera use highlights areas where the device could benefit from further optimisation to meet the needs of more demanding users.   Analysing Battery Efficiency: Logicom Luma vs Xiaomi Redmi A3 Smartphone Comparison A graph comparing the Logicom Luma (blue) and the Xiaomi Redmi A3 (orange) battery consumption across various daily tasks. The current (mA) used by both smartphones is displayed, highlighting the efficiency of each device in managing power during typical usage scenarios. A lower current draw indicates better battery efficiency. Social Media and Communication For social media and outgoing calls, the Logicom Luma  uses less battery to demonstrate higher power efficiency than the Xiaomi Redmi A3 . This suggests that users who frequently engage in social media or make calls might experience longer battery life with the Logicom Luma. This trend highlights Logicom Luma's advantage in handling communication tasks, making it appealing to younger users who are more active on social media. Media and Gaming In gaming and media playback (YouTube and media player) tasks, the Logicom Luma shows better power efficiency, consuming less current than the Xiaomi Redmi A3 . Gaming, a power-intensive activity, shows a significant difference in battery consumption, indicating that the Logicom Luma might be a better choice for avid gamers. Similarly, for media consumption, the lower power draw implies longer usage times for watching videos or listening to music before recharging, enhancing the Logicom Luma's appeal to entertainment-focused users. Messaging and File Transfer The Logicom Luma has been found to perform tasks like MMS, file transfer, and SMS more efficiently, showing a lower current draw compared to the Xiaomi Redmi A3 . This suggests that the Logicom Luma is well-optimised for these activities. Individuals who heavily rely on messaging and file transfers, such as business professionals or those who frequently communicate for work, may find the Logicom Luma's battery life more satisfactory. Camera and Web Browsing The Logicom Luma's power consumption for camera use and web browsing is lower than that of the Xiaomi Redmi A3 . Users who frequently use the camera or browse the web may enjoy a longer battery life, and this efficiency also makes the Logicom Luma a more appealing option for photography enthusiasts and heavy web users. In summary, while the Logicom Luma offers reasonable performance, its higher power efficiency than the Xiaomi Redmi A3 suggests that users might experience less frequent charging. This comparison underscores Logicom Luma's strength in battery efficiency, making it a strong competitor in the Entry Tier market. However, it is essential to note that the Logicom Luma has much longer charging times. According to the test results, the Logicom Luma requires 9.14 hours to charge fully, significantly longer than the Xiaomi Redmi A3 at 2.38 hours and the Xiaomi Redmi 13C at 1.55 hours, highlighting a crucial area for improvement. Analysing Battery Efficiency: Logicom Luma vs Xiaomi Redmi 13C Smartphone Comparison The graph compares the battery consumption of the Logicom Luma (dark blue) and the Xiaomi Redmi 13C (light blue) during various daily tasks, showcasing their power efficiency. A lower current draw indicates better battery efficiency. Social Media and Communication The Logicom Luma demonstrates higher power efficiency for social media and outgoing calls than the Xiaomi Redmi 13C. This suggests that users who frequently engage in social media or make calls might experience longer battery life with the Logicom Luma . Media and Gaming In tasks such as gaming and media playback (YouTube and media player), the Logicom Luma shows mixed results. While it demonstrates better power efficiency for media playback, the Xiaomi Redmi 13C shows a lower battery consumption during gaming. This indicates that the Logicom Luma might be a better choice for users who consume a lot of video content. At the same time, the Xiaomi Redmi 13C could be preferable for gamers due to its lower power consumption during gaming sessions. Messaging and File Transfer Regarding messaging and file transfer, Logicom Luma is the clear winner regarding power efficiency. The Logicom Luma's battery life could be more satisfactory if you rely heavily on these activities. Camera and Web Browsing The Logicom Luma consumes less power when using the camera or browsing the web than the Xiaomi Redmi 13C. This suggests that people who often use the camera or browse the web may enjoy a longer battery life with the Logicom Luma . This efficiency makes it a more appealing choice for photography enthusiasts and heavy web users, showcasing its strength in managing power for these activities. The comparison shows that the Logicom Luma uses less power than the Xiaomi Redmi 13C for most tasks. This means the Logicom Luma is more power-efficient and will have a longer battery life. If you value battery longevity and efficiency, you might prefer the Logicom Luma , mainly if you frequently use social media, watch videos, or take photos. In summary, while the Logicom Luma provides reasonable performance, its higher power efficiency than the Xiaomi Redmi 13C suggests that users may need to charge it less often. This underscores the Logicom Luma's strength in battery efficiency, making it a strong contender in the Entry Tier market. However, it's important to note that the Logicom Luma takes much longer to charge, which could be a drawback for users who need quick recharges.   Analysing Battery Efficiency: Logicom Luma Smartphone Comparison The graph compares the power efficiency of the Logicom Luma with three other smartphones during various daily tasks. It shows each smartphone's current (mA), with a lower current draw indicating better battery efficiency. Social Media and Communication The Logicom Luma stands out with its superior power efficiency regarding social media usage. It uses less current than the Xiaomi Redmi A3 and Xiaomi Redmi 13C . While it's slightly higher than the Entry Tier average, it still offers a balance of efficiency comparable to the overall market standard. While the Logicom Luma demonstrates better efficiency for outgoing calls than the Xiaomi Redmi A3 and Xiaomi Redmi 13C, it's still less efficient than the entry-tier average. Media and Gaming The Logicom Luma consumes more power in gaming than the Xiaomi Redmi 13C , which is the most efficient in this category. However, it performs better than the Xiaomi Redmi A3 and the Entry Tier average. This suggests that while the Logicom Luma is a decent choice for casual gaming, heavy gamers might prefer the Xiaomi Redmi 13C for its superior efficiency. It's worth noting that a more power-efficient smartphone can provide longer gaming sessions without frequent charging, enhancing the overall gaming experience. Regarding media tasks like YouTube and media playback, the Logicom Luma is highly efficient. It consumes less power than the Xiaomi Redmi A3 and the Entry Tier average. While it's slightly more than the Xiaomi Redmi 13C, it is still a strong candidate for users who frequently watch videos or listen to music on their smartphones. Messaging and File Transfer The Logicom Luma shows better power efficiency in MMS and file transfer tasks than the Xiaomi smartphones and the Entry Tier average, making it suitable for users who rely heavily on messaging and file transfers, such as business professionals or those who frequently communicate for work . Camera and Web Browsing The Logicom Luma is more efficient than the Xiaomi Redmi A3 and has an Entry Tier average for camera use, but it consumes slightly more power than the Xiaomi Redmi 13C . So, it is a good option for users who frequently use their phone's camera, though the Xiaomi Redmi 13C may offer slightly better efficiency. In web browsing, the Logicom Luma again shows higher efficiency than the Xiaomi Redmi A3 and Entry Tier average but less efficient than the Xiaomi Redmi 13C. This indicates that the Logicom Luma provides a balanced performance for web browsing, making it a viable choice for internet users. In summary, the Logicom Luma offers solid performance with good battery efficiency in most tasks, making it a strong competitor in the Entry Tier market. Its efficiency in critical areas like social media, messaging, and media playback highlights its strengths. However, the significantly longer charging time is a crucial factor that potential buyers should consider. Users prioritising quick recharges may find this aspect a consideration despite the Logicom Luma’s overall power efficiency.  4. Power Efficiency What is the Battery Efficiency of the Logicom Luma? The battery efficiency for the Logicom Luma was 1 leaf out of 5 . The graph illustrates the battery efficiency ratings of the Logicom Luma  compared to other Entry Tier smartphones. The efficiency is rated on a scale of 1 to 5 leaves, with 5 being the highest efficiency. The Logicom Luma received a rating of 1 leaf, indicating the lowest efficiency among the compared devices. In contrast, the Xiaomi Redmi 13C achieved the highest efficiency with a rating of 1.5 leaves, followed by the Entry Tier average at 1.33 leaves and the Xiaomi Redmi A3 at one leaf. This rating highlights the Logicom Luma 's comparatively lower power efficiency, suggesting that it consumes more battery power for the same tasks than its peers. Users of energy-efficient devices may find the Logicom Luma less appealing than its more efficient counterparts like the Xiaomi Redmi 13C. 5. Annual Energy Consumption How much energy does the Logicom Luma use? Annual energy consumption refers to the total energy a smartphone uses over a year. This measure helps understand the smartphone's long-term efficiency and environmental impact, indicating how much power it draws during typical usage scenarios. The  Logicom Luma has an annual energy consumption of  4.2 kWh. The graph attached illustrates the annual energy consumption of the Logicom Luma compared to similar Entry Tier smartphones, Energy consumption is measured in kilowatt-hours (kWh) per year. With the highest annual energy consumption at 4.2 kWh, the Logicom Luma is significantly higher than the Entry Tier average of 3.2 kWh. The Xiaomi Redmi 13C demonstrates the lowest energy consumption at 2.9 kWh, followed by the Xiaomi Redmi A3 at 3.7 kWh. This indicates that the Logicom Luma is less energy-efficient and consumes more power annually than the others. This higher energy consumption reflects lower power efficiency, suggesting that users may incur higher electricity costs over the smartphone's lifespan. VERDICT: What is it like to Use? Based on various performance metrics and comparisons with other Entry Tier smartphones, the Logicom Luma presents a mixed bag of user experiences, balancing decent performance with notable drawbacks. It shows commendable power efficiency in daily tasks such as social media, messaging, and media playback. For users who frequently engage in social media, make outgoing calls, or watch videos, the Logicom Luma is efficient, consuming less current than the Xiaomi Redmi A3 and performing on par with or better than the Entry Tier average. This makes it a good choice for younger users or those whose daily routines heavily involve these activities. However, the Logicom Luma falls short in areas requiring intensive power usage, such as gaming, where it consumes more power than the Xiaomi Redmi 13C , which is the most efficient. Therefore, heavy gamers might prefer the Xiaomi Redmi 13C for its superior efficiency. Additionally, the Logicom Luma demonstrates good efficiency in camera usage and web browsing, using less power than the Xiaomi Redmi A3 and the entry-tier average. However, it lags slightly behind the Xiaomi Redmi 13C. This balance makes it a viable choice for users who frequently use their phone's camera or browse the web One of the significant drawbacks of the Logicom Luma is its overall battery efficiency and charging time. Scoring only 1 out of 5 in battery efficiency indicates lower power efficiency. Also, the Logicom Luma has a substantially longer charging time of 9.14 hours, much higher than the Xiaomi Redmi A3 (2.38 hours), Xiaomi Redmi 13C (1.55 hours), and the Entry Tier average (3.27 hours). This prolonged charging time can be a major inconvenience for users who need quick recharges and frequent device usage throughout the day. Although, it is suitable for everyday use, its drawbacks in battery efficiency and long charging times may deter potential buyers who prioritise quick recharges and lower energy costs. What's in the box? Logicom Luma Smartphone USB-C cable Charger User Manual 2-year guarantee Should I buy the Logicom Luma? When deciding whether to purchase the Logicom Luma , you must consider your priorities and how you use your mobile phone. Suppose you use your phone for everyday tasks such as social media, messaging, and media playback. In that case, it performs reasonably well regarding power efficiency and is suitable for younger users or those who engage in these activities regularly. However, if you are a heavy gamer or need quick recharges and lower energy consumption, the Logicom Luma's longer charging times and lower battery efficiency are significant drawbacks. Additionally, its higher annual energy consumption suggests higher long-term costs. Overall, while the Logicom Luma offers some strengths in efficiency for everyday tasks, its shortcomings in charging time and energy use make more efficient alternatives like the Xiaomi Redmi 13C more appealing for users with demanding needs. Extra Insights Q: Does the Logicom Luma support 5G? No, it does not Q: Does the Logicom Luma have dual-SIM capabilities? Yes it does Q: What storage and RAM variants support the Logicom Luma? 128 GB of internal storage and 4 GB RAM Q: Does the Logicom Luma have stereo speakers? No, it does not Q: Does the Logicom Luma have a microSD card slot? Yes it does Q: Is the Logicom Luma VoLTE enabled? Yes, it is. Even if the device supports VoLTE users need to have this enabled in their SIMs to work and some networks may not have VoLTE services enabled Pricing and Availability These prices are the best from our Affiliate Partners. As an Amazon Associate, we may earn commissions from qualifying purchases from Amazon.com . You can learn more about our disclosure policy here . VCX (Valued Camera eXperience) The VCX Forum  has been working with its members on the system and infrastructure as a non-profit organisation. We strive to improve our technology to develop and exchange accurate and objective quality and performance indicators, which is our ultimate goal. We will also serve as a compass for the smartphone camera industry. We appreciate your interest in the VCX Forum. No VCX reviews are available for this smartphone. Background Logicom is a well-established French company that has been at the forefront of consumer electronics since its inception in 1993. Over the years, the company has diversified its product offerings, expanding from its origins in residential telephony to include a wide range of innovative technology products. This focuses on smartphones, tablets, connected devices, and more. With a commitment to making cutting-edge technology accessible to everyone, Logicom has built a reputation for providing high-quality, stylish, and affordable electronic devices. With a quarter-century of experience and a dedication to innovation, Logicom remains a trusted name in the consumer electronics industry.  Get all the latest reviews. Join our readers to receive the latest update to our smartphone battery performance scores and performance reviews as soon as we finish testing! Written By Debbie Bouffler is the Marketing and Communications Manager at SmartViser . She is crucial in developing the company's communication and marketing strategies. Debbie has gained extensive experience in strategic business development and marketing in various industries, which has helped her excel in her current position. Debbie is a leader with imagination, an unmatched drive, and an infectious passion for growth and excellence, especially in the telecommunications industry. Affiliate Disclosure: These prices are the best from our Affiliate Partners. As an Amazon Associate, we may earn commissions from qualifying purchases from Amazon.com . You can learn more about our disclosure policy here .

SMARTPHONE TIER: MID TIER Battery Capacity mAh: 5000 Behind the Battery Life: A Deep Dive into the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G Smartphone Battery Performance Based on Price: Mid Tier Ranking # 15 Video Review This review will explain the   ViserMark Labels  in under 5 minutes What you need to know about the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G smartphone. Quick Summary The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G is a feature-packed smartphone emphasising performance and multimedia capabilities. It is well-rounded, with aesthetic appeal and functional features, making it an attractive choice in the Mid Tier (€200-€499). The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G is a sleek and modern smartphone with flat panels and a flat frame, giving it a distinctive appearance. The glossy plastic back highlights two small camera rings, and the matte finish on the flat plastic frame contributes to the device's look and grip. The 6.67-inch AMOLED screen is protected by Gorilla Glass 3, which offers good scratch resistance. The thin bezels on the display enhance the visual appeal, making it an ideal smartphone for multimedia use. This smartphone has an energy-efficient chipset and a 5000mAh battery to deliver over 2 days of battery life and impressive performance in daily user activities like calling, web browsing, and video streaming. More details will be shared later in the review. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G supports 33W fast charging, which can recharge 29% of the battery in just 15 minutes and achieve a full charge in 72 minutes (as stated by Xiaomi). The Redmi Note 13 4G features a hybrid stereo speaker system, with the earpiece also functioning as a second speaker. This design enhances sound balance and overall audio quality. It runs MIUI 14 on top of Android 13, delivering a positive and customisable user experience. An update to HyperOS is also expected in the future. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G also supports dual-band Wi-Fi AC, Bluetooth 5.1 with LE, NFC, and an IR blaster. It has a USB Type-C port with USB 2.0 connectivity, offering a maximum data transfer rate of 480 Mbps. When it comes to the camera, the main 108MP camera is complemented by an 8MP ultrawide and a 2MP macro camera. The front features a 16MP selfie camera. The primary camera delivers decent quality, with natural colours and adequate dynamic range. While the Snapdragon 685 chipset limits the device's video capabilities, it can still capture 1080p video at 30fps. The video quality is generally satisfactory, focusing on preserving natural colours. This smartphone is available in Midnight Black, Mint Green, Ice Blue, and Ocean Sunset. Also, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G has an IP54 rating, which provides dust and splash protection and offers improved resilience over the previous Redmi Note 12 series. In summary, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G is a well-constructed smartphone that balances style and substance. Its design is visually appealing and practical, with a comfortable grip and various colour options to suit different tastes. The display and audio quality are notable highlights, enhancing the multimedia experience. The battery life is robust, with fast charging a nd convenience added . While the camera setup may not be groundbreaking, it performs satisfactorily for most users. The software experience is smooth and customisable, and the range of connectivity options ensures versatility. Overall, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G is a strong contender in the Mid Tier (€200-€499). It offers comprehensive features and appeals to a wide range of users. Specification Overview - Released Date: January 2024 Body : 162.3 x 75.6 x 8 mm or 6.39 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches. Weight 188.5g. Display : 6.67" AMOLED, 120Hz, 1800 nits (peak), 1080 x 2400 px resolution, 20:9 ratio, 395ppi. Protection : Corning Gorilla 3. IP54 dust/water rated. Operating System : Android 13, MIUI 14 Chipset : Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 685 (6 nm)   Memory : 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM ; UFS 2.2 Connectivity : microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) Wi-Fi 802.11 . Bluetooth: 5.1, A2DP, LE Front Camera : 108 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.67", 0.64µm, PDAF, 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, (ultrawide), 2 MP, f/2.4, (macro) Video:   Front camera: 1080p@30fps , 1080p@30fps. Back camera : 1080p@30fps Battery : 5000 mAh, 33W wired Colours : Midnight Black, Mint Green, Ice Blue, Ocean Sunset Others: N FC: Yes. Infrared Port: YES. Loudspeaker: Yes. Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass. Good Points ​Not So Good Points Full retail package, including a charger and case Lack of HDR video playback support, a feature commonly found in Xiaomi smartphones IP68-rated with Gorilla Glass 3 for protection and enhanced durability Noticeable performance issues with UI slowdowns, particularly in graphically intensive tasks Stereo speakers enhance the audio experience Fast and efficient charging solution Strong performance from the main and selfie cameras ​ Best Prices: Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G   (We may earn a small commission when you purchase through links in our articles) French Visitors take a look: Site officiel de Xiaomi France Smartphone Battery Performance - FULL REVIEW ViserMark   offers a comprehensive range of battery performance test results based on different criteria and benchmarks for evaluating a smartphone's performance. Our tests are performed using the strictest protocol in a controlled environment to ensure repetition and consistency powered by SmartViser's test automation solution viSer.    VWS Analytics Studio  is a complementary product to the viSer Test Automation solution and provides an enhanced viSer user experience. It is the fastest way to analyse smartphone test results and view them. We have used the interactive dashboard to show you the recent test results for the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G  and comparative smartphones. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G ViserMark Labels Battery Performance review by  ViserMark  is based on the smartphone battery performance results obtained during testing. With its advanced features, including a robust camera system and long battery life, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G is a comprehensive package for users. It represents a significant step up from its predecessor, marking it a valuable option for those seeking an exceptional smartphone experience. The ViserMark labels provide valuable insights into the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G's  battery performance. Reading this review, you can find a full breakdown of our battery performance results. Battery Performance Score Battery Life Battery Consumption   Battery Efficiency   Annual Energy Consumption   Also of Interest: ViserMark Labels Battery Performance Here's the Battery Performance score for the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G  has undergone testing to evaluate its battery performance, with the results presented using ViserMark labels. At the same time, it offers extremely good battery performance and ranks in #2 place i n the 2024 smartphone ranking table . The Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra remains the overall leader in battery performance; so far this year, Battery performance is a crucial factor influencing user choices. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G and one of its predecessors, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ , share the same score of 48/100, indicating similar overall battery performance. The Samsung Galaxy A54 , while featuring a lower score, is not far behind, suggesting only a slight underperformance in comparison. The chart below displays three smartphones' ViserMark battery performance scores for a clearer comparison. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G and Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ score 48/100 in battery performance. This similarity indicates comparable overall efficiency and longevity, although they might differ in other hardware specifications. The Samsung Galaxy A54 , with a slightly lower score of 42/100, indicates a marginal deficit in battery performance, possibly due to differences in software optimisation or hardware power consumption. For users reading the review, these insights imply that the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G offers a reliable battery life, which is on par with other high-performing smartphones in the Mid-Tier. The balance between battery capacity, hardware efficiency, and software optimisation is crucial in determining a smartphone's overall battery performance. While the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G does not significantly outshine its competitors in this area, it maintains a good standard that meets general user expectations for Mid Tier smartphones. Battery Life Let's see the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G test results One of the most vital aspects to consider when choosing a smartphone is battery life. This feature becomes even more critical for users who depend on their smartphones for extended periods without access to charging. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G demonstrates exceptional battery performance with 51 hours of usage. This surpasses the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ , 45 hours, and the Samsung Galaxy A54 , 39 hours. Despite all three devices possessing the same 5000mAh battery capacity, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G efficiently utilises its battery resources, offering extended usage. The chart below shows all three comparable smartphones. Thanks to its extended battery life, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G offers several benefits to users. Firstly, there are less frequent charging requirements, making the phone more suitable for extended use. Long-lasting performance is reliable throughout the day, and the lower energy consumption of the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G translates to savings in power costs over time, making it a cost-effective choice in the long run. This smartphone is an appealing choice for users who prioritise battery life. Be the first to know about new reviews, updates, news and events.   Battery Consumption The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G  battery life details, as analysed using SmartViser's viSer and VWS Analytics Studio , provide a technical and detailed perspective on the device's battery consumption. The platform's capability to monitor and access real-time test results explains how the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G manages power under various daily user tasks. ViserMark can identify the strengths and weaknesses of smartphones by comparing battery usage across similar devices, enabling potential buyers to choose the best smartphone based on their usage patterns. This chart directly compares the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G  against the average battery consumption values for Mid Tier smartphones tested in 2023. It will determine how the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G performs regarding  battery consumption for daily activities. Battery Consumption Results provided by viSer  by Smart V iser . Reviewing the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G 's battery consumption reveals several key insights. As you can see, the smartphone's battery usage during social media activities is notably higher than the Mid Tier average, indicating that busy social media users may need to recharge more frequently. Similarly, activities like outgoing calls and sending MMS also draw more power from the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G than typical for Mid Tier smartphones, which might affect users who rely heavily on voice calls and messaging services throughout the day. However, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G shows that battery consumption during gaming sessions is quite efficient, suggesting that it could be a favourable option for mobile gamers looking for sustained play without the frequent need to recharge. Also, when it comes to camera use, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G exhibits higher battery usage than the average, likely reflecting the energy demand of processing high-resolution images or videos. Regarding web browsing, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G demonstrates efficient power management, suggesting prolonged browsing sessions without substantial battery drain, a plus for users who surf the web extensively. For activities related to media consumption, such as watching YouTube videos or using a media player, the smartphone's battery consumption aligns closely with the Mid Tier average, implying a standard experience for users engaging in these activities. Lastly, the slightly above-average battery consumption for productivity tasks like email and SMS is unlikely to pose a significant issue for typical users. In summary, while the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G shows increased battery consumption for certain tasks such as social media, calling, and camera usage, it balances this with more efficient energy usage in gaming and web browsing. These insights into the smartphone's battery performance can help users align their expectations with their usage patterns. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ Smartphone Comparison This comparison between the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G and Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+  examines how these two smartphones consume battery power during typical daily activities. The chart below visually represents the strengths and weaknesses of each smartphone. Battery Consumption Results provided by viSer  by Smart V iser . In assessing the battery consumption of the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G and the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ , the analysis reveals various aspects of their performance that will interest potential buyers. The test results indicate that the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G tends to consume more power when engaging with social media platforms. This suggests that users who frequently browse feeds, post, or engage in social networking may find the need for more frequent charging sessions. Additionally, this smartphone draws more battery during voice calls and sending multimedia messages, a point to consider for busy communicators. However, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G shines in the gaming department, demonstrating greater energy efficiency than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ . Gamers looking for extended playtime without the hassle of recharging would appreciate this advantage. Also, it's camera usage and data transfers use more battery. For video and music enthusiasts, the battery performance of the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G sits close to the middle ground when consuming media content. With productivity tasks such as managing emails and text messaging, both smartphones exhibit similar battery usage, with the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G edging slightly higher in consumption. Lastly, with web browsing, there is a marginally higher battery use in the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G . This is something for heavy web users to remember, as they may notice a faster decline in battery levels. While the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G uses more power in several areas, it also offers notable advantages, particularly for gaming. Users must balance these findings with their needs and usage patterns to determine which device best suits their lifestyle. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G vs Samsung Galaxy A54 Smartphone Comparison Users often look beyond basic specifications to understand how smartphones perform in everyday scenarios—this comparison is with the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G ViserMark Labels Redmi Note 13 4G and the Samsung Galaxy A54  focuses on battery consumption. Battery Consumption Results provided by viSer  by Smart V iser . Their battery consumption is in focus in a head-to-head battery performance comparison between the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G and the Samsung Galaxy A54 . The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G draws more power during social media activities than the Samsung Galaxy A54 . This higher consumption suggests frequent social media users may reach for the charger more often with the Xiaomi smartphone. Also, the Samsung Galaxy A54 exhibits greater battery drain during outgoing calls. Gaming presents a contrasting picture, with the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G showing better energy management and drawing less power than the Samsung Galaxy A54 . This makes the Xiaomi smartphone more suitable for gamers looking for longer uninterrupted playtime. Both smartphones use considerable power for camera use, which is battery-intensive. However, the Samsung Galaxy A54 edges out the others slightly in terms of efficiency. Both smartphones are on par regarding media consumption, such as streaming YouTube videos or using a media player. This implies that users could expect similar battery longevity from either device for entertainment. Interestingly, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G consumes more battery for email tasks. Lastly, the web browsing experience sees the Redmi Note 13 4G using slightly more power than the Galaxy A54. For those who spend considerable time surfing the web, this difference, although small, could be a deciding factor in favour of the Samsung Galaxy A54 . The choice between the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G and the Samsung Galaxy A54 may come down to individual usage patterns. The Xiaomi smartphone seems well-suited for gamers and those who engage in fewer but longer calls. In contrast, the Samsung Galaxy A54 could be the one for those who are more active in photography and seek more efficient email and web browsing sessions. Each smartphone has its strengths, and understanding these can help consumers make an informed decision that aligns with their personal smartphone use. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G Overall Smartphone Comparison We compare the battery consumption of Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G , Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ , and   Samsung Galaxy A54  during various common activities, contrasting their battery consumption with the average for Flagship/Pro-tier smartphones. This comparison chart below aims to offer a clear understanding of which smartphone would be the best fit for your lifestyle and usage habits.   Battery Consumption Results provided by viSer  by Smart V iser . Starting with social media, a known battery-intensive activity, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G shows considerable consumption, a factor social network enthusiasts should consider. However, it redeems itself in gaming performance, where it excels by managing power more effectively than its counterparts, offering an advantage to gamers. The chart shows the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G as average in managing battery life for typical communication tasks like calls and multimedia messaging. It neither underperforms nor stands out, suggesting balanced energy usage for such essential functions. The camera is not the most power-efficient but maintains a reasonable middle ground, suggesting that photography sessions won't be too demanding on the battery. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G aligns with the competition by streaming YouTube videos and using media players. Interestingly, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G shows slightly higher battery consumption for productivity-oriented activities like managing emails and browsing the web. This is crucial for those using their phone as a professional tool, as it may require more frequent charging. Overall, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G, while exhibiting higher energy consumption in specific areas, maintains a satisfactory performance that can cater to different user needs. Gamers, in particular, might find the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G appealing, whereas heavy social media users and professional users might need to evaluate their options based on their specific requirements. The ViserMark analysis of these detailed battery performance test results helps users make an informed decision that aligns with their usage patterns and expectations from their smartphone's battery life. Power Efficiency Here are the test results for the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G This ViserMark label is especially vital for users who prioritise a smartphone that can efficiently manage its power consumption while performing various tasks. This relatively low-efficiency score shows that while the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G  has a long battery life, it may not utilise its battery capacity as effectively as possible. This could impact users looking for the most energy-efficient smartphones. All three smartphones have relatively low battery efficiency. This rating reflects potential areas for improvement, such as optimising software for better energy consumption or using more efficient components. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G 's test results in terms of battery efficiency present just one out of a potential five leaves. This rating aligns with the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ and Samsung Galaxy A54 , indicating a low trend of battery efficiency within the Mid Tier. With concerns about energy consumption and its environmental impact, smartphone users may pause. This low-efficiency rating also suggests that while smartphones may offer satisfactory battery life in terms of hours of usage, they do so at a greater energy cost over time, which could translate to more frequent charges and higher electricity usage. These insights underscore an opportunity for future smartphones to improve in this area, providing the same or extended battery life with lower energy consumption. For the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G , the decision will likely hinge on whether the phone's other features and price point outweigh the modest battery efficiency. The phone may still appeal to those who prioritise performance and display quality over outright efficiency, particularly if the energy consumption aligns with their usage patterns and charging habits. Annual Energy Consumption The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G 's annual energy consumpti on benefits energy-conscious users . Our ViserMark testing has determined that this smartphone consumes 3.2 kWh per annum. This reflects the energy consumption throughout a year of typical usage, providing an estimate of the overall energy impact for the user. Today, people are more environmentally conscious, and the energy of smartphones is important for many users. Knowing the annual energy consumption of a smartphone offers insights into its long-term efficiency and environmental impact. The chart below shows the annual energy consumption of three comparable smartphones. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G , which has been noted to have an annual energy consumption of 3.2, indicates that it offers a favourable energy profile among its contemporaries. This efficiency in energy consumption could translate to not only potential cost savings for users but also a reduced environmental impact over the lifespan of the device. Compared to the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ and the Samsung Galaxy A54 , which have higher annual energy consumptions of 3.6 and 4.16, respectively, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G presents a more energy-conscious choice. This is particularly appealing in today's eco-aware markets, where energy efficiency is increasingly valued alongside performance. In summary, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G is a solid choice for smartphone users who prioritize energy efficiency. Also of Interest:   Smartphone Ranking Table.     ViserMark VERDICT: What is it like to Use? The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G delivers a reliable user experience, particularly in battery life, which is robust enough to handle various tasks without frequent charges. Its gaming performance is commendable, making it a suitable choice for mobile gaming users. However, heavy social media users might find the battery life somewhat limiting. The smartphone's camera and data transfer capabilities balance power consumption and functionality. For video streaming and music playback, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G performs on par with expectations, ensuring enjoyable media consumption. It's a capable smartphone that balances performance and battery longevity, except for more intensive tasks that could lead to quicker battery drain. Should I buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G? The decision to purchase the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G hinges on individual usage patterns and priorities. If battery life, especially during gaming, and a moderate consumption rate for web browsing and media consumption are important to you, this phone is certainly worth considering. It is well-suited for those who value long play sessions or extensive web surfing. However, the device may not be the most optimal choice for users who are highly active on social media, make frequent calls, or are involved in heavy photography due to its higher battery consumption in these areas. Potential buyers should weigh these considerations carefully to determine whether the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G aligns with their lifestyle and usage needs. Best Prices: Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G   (We may earn a small commission when you purchase through links in our articles) French Visitors take a look: Site officiel de Xiaomi France VCX (Valued Camera eXperience) The VCX Forum  has been working with its members on the system and infrastructure as a non-profit organisation. We strive to improve our technology to develop and exchange accurate and objective quality and performance indicators, which is our ultimate goal. We will also serve as a compass for the smartphone camera industry. We appreciate your interest in VCX Forum. No VCX reviews are available for this smartphone. Background Xiaomi   was founded in 2010 by serial entrepreneur Lei Jun, who believes in high quality. Technology doesn't need to cost a fortune. It is focused on being the most user-centric mobile internet company. With more than 61 million handsets sold in 2014 and products launched in Taiwan, Hong Kong, Singapore, Malaysia, Philippines, India, Indonesia, and Brazil, Xiaomi is expanding its footprint worldwide to become a global brand. Xiaomi is headquartered in Beijing, China, and has offices in Asia-Pacific, India, and Brazil. Be the first to know about new reviews, updates, news and events.   Written By: Debbie Bouffler is the Marketing and Communications Manager at Smart V iser . She plays a crucial role in developing communication and marketing strategies for the company. Debbie has gained extensive experience in strategic business development and marketing in various industries, which has helped her excel in her current position. Debbie is a leader with imagination, an unmatched drive, and an infectious passion for growth and excellence, especially in the telecommunications industry. For further insights into her professional journey or to connect, visit Debbie on LinkedIn .   Affiliate Disclosure: These prices are the best from our Affiliate Partners. We link to relevant and other trusted affiliate partners like Xiaomi FR.  If a ViserMark user clicks an affiliate link and purchases a smartphone from any of these affiliate sites within a set amount of time, ViserMark receives a small commission.  You   can learn more about our disclosure policy here .