SMARTPHONE TIER: MID TIER Battery Capacity mAh: 5200 Motorola Moto G56 5G: A Rugged Mid-Range Phone With Big Battery Power SMARTPHONE BATTERY PERFORMANCE Based on Price: Mid Tier (€200-€499) Mid  Tier Ranking # 11 Learn more: Quick Summary ViserMark Labels Specifications Know the Test Results ViserMark Verdict Video Review - Soon Available The Motorola Moto G56 5G is another addition to the brand’s sprawling mid-range line-up, positioned as a practical choice for those who want reliable performance, a long-lasting battery, and a few thoughtful extras without paying premium prices. It doesn’t aim to reinvent the wheel or dazzle with cutting-edge hardware. Instead, it quietly leans on Motorola’s proven formula. Clean software, decent specifications, and small quality-of-life features that still matter to a lot of people. Motorola has never been about flashy designs, and the Moto G56 follows suit. The rear panel has a textured matte finish that resists fingerprints and provides good grip, while the dual-camera module is tidy and unobtrusive. At around 200 grams and 8.35 mm thick, it’s on the heavier side, but still ergonomic enough to handle comfortably. Durability is where the G56 really shines. With IP68 rating, it offers stronger water and dust resistance than most phones in this price bracket. Add Corning Gorilla Glass 7i protection on the display and compliance with MIL-STD-810H tests, and it’s clearly built to withstand everyday knocks, splashes, and even harsher conditions. Colour choices are restrained and practical, in darker and muted tones, but the overall build is sturdier than many glossy competitors. The phone carries a 6.72-inch Full HD+ LCD panel with a 120Hz refresh rate. It’s not OLED, so it lacks the deeper blacks and contrast of some rivals, but brightness is sufficient for outdoor use and colour reproduction is balanced, if slightly muted. Scrolling and animations feel smooth thanks to the high refresh rate, and for casual browsing or streaming, the display does the job well. Under the hood, the G56 runs on MediaTek’s Dimensity 7060 chipset, paired with up to 8GB of RAM and 128GB of storage (expandable via microSD in many markets). Everyday tasks are handled smoothly. Even light gaming runs fine at modest settings, though more demanding titles will show the phone’s limits. Reviewers have noted some occasional lag when multitasking or switching camera modes, but thermal management is solid, the phone doesn’t overheat easily under sustained use. Motorola’s software experience remains one of its biggest strengths. Running Android 15 with My UX, the interface feels clean, fast, and bloat-free. Handy gestures like the double twist to launch the camera or the chop motion to turn on the flashlight are still present, giving the G56 a bit of Motorola’s trademark convenience. The biggest downside is software longevity. Motorola promises two major Android updates and four years of security patches. That’s decent for a budget-friendly phone but well behind Samsung and Google, which now guarantee at least five years. If you keep your phone for a long time, this limitation is worth factoring in. On the camera side, the Moto G56 offers a 50 MP main sensor supported by an 8 MP ultrawide lens. In practice, daylight shots are sharp with decent dynamic range, though low-light performance is weaker due to the lack of optical image stabilisation (OIS). Video recording is capped at 1080p, putting it behind some rivals that now offer 4K at this tier. The 32 MP selfie camera is solid in good lighting but struggles in dim conditions. Overall, the setup is competent but far from standout, perfectly fine for casual users, but not for creators. One of the G56 ’s strongest points is its 5,200 mAh battery, which easily lasts a full day of heavy use and often stretches into a second day with lighter usage. Charging is handled by 30W wired TurboPower, which is adequate but slower than the 50W–65W speeds some rivals now bring to the mid-tier. There’s no wireless charging, but that’s par for the course at this price. Audio is another small strength. Stereo speakers with Dolby Atmos provide loud and reasonably balanced sound. Traditionalists will also appreciate the continued presence of a 3.5mm headphone jack and microSD card slot, both rare in 2025’s mid-range market. Connectivity includes 5G, NFC, Wi-Fi ac, and Bluetooth 5.3, covering all the essentials. Pros Cons Robust IP68/69 water and dust resistance, rare in this price bracket LCD panel instead of OLED, with weaker contrast and colours Large 6.72-inch FHD+ display with 120Hz refresh rate for smooth scrolling Camera system is basic: 50MP main is fine, but lacks OIS and tops out at 1080p video Solid 5,200mAh battery delivers easily a day and a half, often two Low-light photography is noisy; secondary sensors add little value Clean, near-stock Android 15 with handy Motorola gestures (torch, camera) Only two years of OS updates (four years of security patches) Stereo speakers with Dolby Atmos for loud, clear audio AI features in Essential Space feel basic and unfinished Retains 3.5mm headphone jack and microSD card slot Performance dips in heavier gaming or multitasking Reliable everyday performance with MediaTek Dimensity 7025 Chunky at 200g and 8.35mm, less sleek than some rivals Reliable everyday performance with MediaTek Dimensity 7025 Software support lags behind Samsung and Google’s long-term commitments Expandable storage option for those who need more space Comfortable matte-textured finish that resists fingerprints   ViserMark Labels for the Motorola Moto G56 5G Please take a look at the following information about the battery performance of the Motorola Moto G56 5G : Battery Life: The Motorola Moto G56 5G delivers endurance that is solid, if not class-leading. In testing, it managed around 39 hours of active use, translating to roughly a day and a half of real-world usage for most people. The sizeable 5,200mAh cell provides headroom for heavy scrolling, video playback, and light gaming without forcing a mid-day top-up. Compared to Samsung’s Galaxy A26, the G56 lasts longer under mixed loads, but it lags behind both the mid-tier average and the standout Nothing CMF Phone 2 Pro. While it won’t stretch comfortably into two full days, its stamina is still more than adequate for anyone who charges nightly. Battery Charging: Motorola equips the G56 with 30W wired charging, which feels modest in 2025’s mid-range market. A full charge takes around 1 hour 47 minutes, with a 50% boost achieved in just under 40 minutes using the supplied charger. There’s no wireless charging support, which is not unusual at this price, but worth flagging for anyone eyeing premium convenience. In short, the charging speed is functional rather than competitive, suited more to overnight top-ups than quick pit stops. Battery Performance & Efficiency: Independent measurements show the Moto G56 5G consuming about 4.3 kWh annually, which is less efficient than the mid-tier average (3.6 kWh) and notably behind the Nothing CMF Phone 2 Pro (2.9 kWh). Its efficiency rating of 0.5 “leaves” highlights a clear gap in optimisation, placing it alongside the Galaxy A26 rather than more refined rivals. In day-to-day use, this means the G56 handles casual tasks predictably well, but under heavier loads, drain levels spike more quickly than competitors. For users who value sheer endurance over cutting-edge efficiency, the Moto G56 is a dependable if unspectacular performer. Specification Overview  - Released Date: May 2025 Body & Build: Dimensions: 165.8 × 76.3 × 8.4 mm Weight: 200 g Materials: Glass front (Gorilla Glass 7i), plastic frame, silicone polymer (eco leather) back Durability: IP68 / IP69 dust-tight and water resistant (up to 1.5 m for 30 minutes, high-pressure water jets) Display: Size: 6.72 inches Resolution: 1080 × 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~392 ppi) Refresh Rate: 120 Hz Brightness: ~1000 nits typical / “High Brightness Mode” for outdoor use Protection: Corning Gorilla Glass 7i, Mohs hardness level 6 Operating System: OS: Android 15 with Motorola My UX customisations Chipset & Performance: Processor: MediaTek Dimensity 7060 (6 nm) CPU: Octa-core (2×2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 + 6×2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) GPU: IMG BXM-8-256 Memory & Storage: Configurations: 128 GB + 4 GB RAM / 128 GB + 8 GB RAM/ 256 GB + 8 GB RAM / 256 GB + 12 GB RAM / 512 GB + 12 GB RAM Expandable: microSDXC (shared SIM slot) Connectivity & Features: SIM: Single Nano-SIM, Dual Nano-SIM, Nano-SIM + eSIM 5G: Supported (Sub-6 GHz) Wi-Fi: Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band Bluetooth: 5.3, A2DP, LE NFC: Yes (region dependent) USB: USB Type-C 2.0 Biometrics: Side-mounted fingerprint sensor Sensors: Accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass Audio: Speakers: Stereo speakers with Dolby Atmos Headphone Jack: 3.5 mm present Camera System: Rear Cameras: 50 MP (f/1.8, 25mm wide, 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF) / 8 MP (f/2.2, 12mm ultrawide, 118˚ FOV, 1.12µm) Rear Features: LED flash, HDR, panorama Rear Video: 1080p@30/60fps Front Camera: 32 MP (f/2.2, wide, 0.7µm) HDR Video Recording:  Yes (1080p) Colours Available: Pantone Black Oyster, Pantone Gray Mist, Pantone Dazzling Blue, Pantone Dill Performance - HOW WE TEST ViserMark  offers a comprehensive range of battery performance test results based on different criteria and benchmarks for evaluating a smartphone's performance. Our tests are performed using the strictest protocol in a controlled environment to ensure repetition and consistency powered by SmartViser's test auto mation solution viSer . Translating technical specifications into consumer benefits with SmartViser VWS Analytics Studio  is a complementary product to the viSer Test Automation solution. It enhances the viSer user experience and is the fastest way to analyse and view smartphone test results. We have used the interactive dashboard to show you the recent test results and translated them into ViserMark Labels. Join our readers to receive the latest update to our smartphone battery performance scores and performance reviews as soon as we finish testing! Smartphone Battery Performance - FULL TEST RESULTS AND REVIEW ViserMark has put the Motorola Moto G56 5G through our testing protocol, based on real smartphone usage from 100% battery level down to power off. This includes daily activities, such as calls, web, video and music streaming, gaming, social networks, picture and video capture, and standby. All activities are executed in a defined order and timeline.   These test results, show how the Motorola Moto G56 5G performed and the scores achieved. 1. Battery Performance The Motorola Moto G56 5G  achieved a battery performance score of 40/100, placing it just above the Samsung Galaxy A26 (36) but below both the mid-tier average of 44.52 and standout rivals such as the Nothing CMF Phone 2 Pro (50). While its result underscores decent endurance, it also highlights the phone’s weaker efficiency compared to the best mid-range devices. Charging is managed through 30W wired TurboPower (USB PD 3.0). Motorola advertises quick top-ups that provide “hours of use in minutes,” but a full refill still takes around 1 hour 47 minutes in testing. This makes it adequate for overnight charging but slower than many similarly priced rivals, and there is no support for wireless or reverse charging, which keeps it firmly in mid-range territory. Overall, the Moto G56 5G offers reliable stamina with respectable charging speed. It’s a phone that can be trusted to get you through a busy day without stress, yet it lacks the energy optimisation and endurance polish that define the most efficient mid-range handsets of 2025. 2. Battery Life In ViserMark’s battery life testing, the Motorola Moto G56 5G  achieved 39 hours of active usage, which translates to around 1.5 days of typical use. This positions it slightly ahead of the Samsung Galaxy A26 (35 hours) but below the mid-tier average of 46 hours, and well short of the Nothing CMF Phone 2 Pro (55 hours). The result highlights the G56’s dependability for day-and-a-half endurance, but also underlines the efficiency gap compared to the best-optimised mid-range devices. The phone’s stamina comes courtesy of its 5,200mAh cell and MediaTek Dimensity 7060 chipset, which handle lighter tasks with ease, but see steeper drain under camera or calls than rivals like the CMF Phone 2 Pro . While not poor by any stretch, the G56 lacks the energy refinement that pushes other devices into the two-day club. For most users, the Moto G56 5G provides peace of mind across a full day with buffer into the next, and comfortably outpaces Samsung’s A26 . However, if efficiency and long-haul endurance are priorities, the CMF Phone 2 Pro  and even the category average remain more appealing benchmarks. 3.   Battery Consumption The Motorola Moto G56 5G  generally demonstrates lower power consumption than the Samsung Galaxy A26  in most everyday categories, including social media, outgoing calls, gaming, downloads/uploads, YouTube playback, and web browsing. This suggests the G56 is better optimised for sustained communication, connectivity, and general screen-on tasks, where the A26 tends to draw far more heavily on its battery. The balance shifts in camera use, where the Galaxy A26 proves more efficient. Meanwhile, in media playback, the two devices are almost identical, with no meaningful difference likely to be noticed in real-world use. Despite both devices carrying large batteries (5,200 mAh for the Moto G56 vs 5,000 mAh for the Galaxy A26 ), the Moto G56 5G ultimately delivers longer overall stamina in ViserMark’s testing. This reflects stronger system-level optimisation on Motorola’s part, whereas the Galaxy A26 ’s higher current draw across most categories undermines its endurance. When comparing the Motorola Moto G56 5G  with the Nothing CMF Phone 2 Pro , the data highlights two mid-tier devices with similar large batteries (5,200 mAh for the G56 vs 5,000 mAh for the CMF) but noticeably different efficiency profiles. The Moto G56 5G proves more frugal in several everyday categories, including social media and downloads/uploads, where its lower current draw suggests stronger optimisation for online-heavy use. For users who spend much of their time scrolling or messaging, the G56 offers an efficiency edge. By contrast, the CMF Phone 2 Pro dominates in the majority of demanding workloads, particularly outgoing calls, gaming, camera use, YouTube playback, and media consumption, where the G56 consumes more power. Even in web browsing, the CMF holds a slight advantage, highlighting its broader optimisation for sustained screen-on tasks. Overall, the Moto G56 5G is the better pick for light social and network activity, but the CMF Phone 2 Pro pulls ahead in both multimedia and performance-heavy scenarios. The trade-off is clear: Motorola prioritises endurance in lighter use, while Nothing’s CMF device is tuned for efficiency under load. When comparing battery efficiency across the Motorola Moto G56 5G , Samsung Galaxy A26 , Nothing CMF Phone 2 Pro , and the mid-tier average, clear differences emerge in how each device manages real-world power demands. The Moto G56 5G demonstrates a balanced profile overall. It draws slightly more power than the average in outgoing calls and camera use, but proves competitive in social media, downloads/uploads, and web browsing. Its efficiency in media playback and Youtube is also close to the segment benchmark, showing Motorola’s tuning focuses on steady all-round performance. The Samsung Galaxy A26 , by contrast, is the most power-hungry of the three. It consumes significantly more current across nearly every category, especially in social media, outgoing calls, and web browsing. Even with a similar battery size (~5,000 mAh), this high draw undermines its stamina, explaining why it lags behind in real-world endurance testing. The Nothing CMF Phone 2 Pro  stands out for its strong efficiency in gaming (-406 mA), YouTube (-427 mA), and media playback (-300 mA), making it well-suited for users who spend time on entertainment-heavy workloads. However, it pulls more current than average in downloads/uploads and also sits behind the G56 in calling, suggesting its optimisation prioritises multimedia rather than communication-heavy tasks. In short, the CMF Phone 2 Pro comes across as the most balanced of the three, optimised for consistent performance across varied usage. The Moto G56 5G delivers steady efficiency but leans slightly heavier on communication and camera tasks, while the Galaxy A26 struggles with high drain nearly everywhere. 4.   Battery Efficiency In ViserMark’s battery efficiency evaluation, the Motorola Moto G56 5G achieved a modest 0.5-leaf rating, placing it behind both the Nothing CMF Phone 2 Pro (1.5 leaves) and the mid-tier average of 1.09 leaves. This shows that, while the G56 maintains competitive battery life thanks to its large 5,200 mAh cell, it isn’t among the most finely optimised devices in its category. The score reflects a tuning profile that prioritises steady all-round performance rather than squeezing maximum efficiency out of every workload. While Motorola avoids the excessive peaks seen in the Samsung Galaxy A26 , its optimisation doesn’t reach the same level of refinement as the CMF Phone 2 Pro . 5.   Annual Energy Consumption According to ViserMark’s annual energy testing, the Motorola Moto G56 5G  consumes around 4.3 kWh per year, placing it above the mid-tier average of 3.59 kWh and significantly less efficient than the Nothing CMF Phone 2 Pro (2.9 kWh). Only the Samsung Galaxy A26  fares worse, drawing 4.6 kWh annually, making it the least efficient of the group. This result highlights the G56’s reliance on its large 5,200 mAh battery to deliver competitive endurance rather than on underlying hardware–software efficiency. While Motorola manages to avoid the excessive drain of the Galaxy A26 , its energy use still positions it closer to the higher end of the consumption scale. For everyday users, this means the G56 5G remains a dependable performer in real-world stamina but does so with a heavier annual energy footprint. In sustainability terms, it trails behind the CMF Phone 2 Pro , which balances endurance with far lower long-term consumption. Who Should Buy the Motorola Moto G56 5G ? The Motorola Moto G56 5G  is best suited for users who want a practical mid-range smartphone that prioritises durability, long-lasting battery life, and everyday usability over flashy extras. It doesn’t try to compete with premium rivals on cutting-edge features but instead delivers steady, reliable performance for those who simply want a phone that gets the job done. With its IP68 water and dust resistance, MIL-STD-810H compliance, and Corning Gorilla Glass 7i protection, the G56 stands out as one of the most rugged mid-rangers in its price range. Paired with a large 5,200 mAh battery, it comfortably lasts a day and a half for most people, making it a great fit for commuters, outdoor workers, or anyone who values endurance and toughness in a phone. Its 6.72-inch LCD with 120Hz refresh rate ensures smooth scrolling and solid visibility outdoors, even if it lacks the vibrancy of AMOLED competitors. Combined with clean Android 15 software, Motorola’s helpful gestures, and expandable storage plus a 3.5mm headphone jack, the G56 is ideal for students, families, and traditionalists who appreciate functionality and convenience over flashy design. That said, it’s not for everyone. The basic dual-camera system is fine for casual photography but lags behind rivals that now offer 4K video or OIS for low light. Similarly, gaming performance is limited, and the software support window (two OS updates, four years of patches) is shorter than what Samsung or Google now provide. In short, the Moto G56 5G is a dependable mid-range option for practical users, those who want rugged durability, strong everyday stamina, clean software, and legacy features like the headphone jack and microSD slot. It’s less suited to power users, gamers, or aspiring content creators, but for no-nonsense reliability at an affordable price, it makes a strong case. ViserMark VERDICT The Motorola Moto G56 5G  doesn’t try to steal headlines, but it delivers what matters: durability, dependable battery, and a no-nonsense experience. Where many mid-rang­ers cut corners, the G56 preserves useful basics—expandable storage, headphone jack—while reinforcing the shell with IP68 and MIL-STD durability. Its 6.72-inch 120Hz LCD won’t match the contrast of OLEDs, but it’s sufficiently bright for outdoor use and smooth in everyday use. Combined with Android 15 + My UX, the interface stays lean, responsive, and pleasantly free of bloat. Performance is solid for daily tasks, social media, browsing, messaging all feel smooth. But the G56 isn’t built for extremes; demanding 3D games or heavy multitasking expose its limits. The camera setup is straightforward: the 50 MP main + 8 MP ultrawide, with a 32 MP front, is serviceable in good light, though low-light and video capabilities are modest by current standards. The Moto G56 5G  is not the flashiest mid-ranger, but it’s one of the more reliable ones. It’s built for users who want a phone that just works—durably, predictably, and without frills—so long as your expectations don’t include top-tier cameras or update guarantees. VCX (Valued Camera eXperience) The VCX Forum  has been working with its members on the system and infrastructure as a non-profit organisation. We strive to improve our technology to develop and exchange accurate and objective quality and performance indicators, which is our ultimate goal. We will also serve as a compass for the smartphone camera industry. We appreciate your interest in the VCX Forum. VCX Forum: No review Background Motorola  is a well-established and innovative technology company known for its contributions to the telecommunications industry. Founded in 1928, Motorola has a rich history of pioneering achievements, including the development of the first handheld mobile phone. Today, the company continues to produce a wide range of consumer electronics, with a focus on smartphones that offer reliable performance, innovative features, and value for money. Motorola's smartphones are known for their durability, user-friendly interfaces, and strong battery life, making them a popular choice for consumers worldwide. Written by Marcella Frattari   is the Communication Marketing and Lead Generation Manager at SmartViser, playing a key role in shaping the company's communication and marketing strategies. With a background in journalism and a passion for digital communication, Marcella focuses on improving SmartViser's overall online presence and engagement. Her dedication to clear, effective communication and creative content makes her a valuable asset to the team. Press Contact Marcella Frattari: Contact@visermark.com Our Resources ViserMark Scores ViserMark Reviews Success Stories Latest Articles Discover what ViserMark is all about. Read ViserMark's latest in-depth smartphone battery reviews. Discover our main success stories with Telecoms and other industries. Read more articles on our battery life, performance reviews, and test results. Know more Know more Know more Know more

SMARTPHONE TIER: FLAGSHIP/PRO TIER Battery Capacity mAh: 4500 Motorola Razr 60:   fun, functional, and refreshingly uncomplicated SMARTPHONE BATTERY PERFORMANCE Based on Price: Flagship/Pro Tier (€700+) Mid  Tier Ranking # 9 Learn more: Quick Summary ViserMark Labels Specifications Know the Test Results ViserMark Verdict Video Review - Soon Available The Motorola Razr 60 represents the brand’s confident return to the foldable mainstream. It’s not a bleeding-edge flagship like its Ultra sibling, but rather a refined, well-balanced clamshell that aims to bring the flip-phone experience to a broader audience, combining modern hardware, a playful design, and sensible pricing. It doesn’t try to break records or redefine the category; instead, it focuses on making the flip format genuinely practical day to day. Motorola leans on what it does best: design that feels distinct without screaming for attention. The Razr 60 inherits the silhouette of its predecessors — compact when folded, tall and slim when open — while introducing softer edges and new Pantone-certified colours. The finish is smooth and tactile, with a nylon-inspired back that’s easy to grip and resists fingerprints. The stainless-steel hinge feels sturdy and reassuring, opening with a satisfying snap and staying firmly in place at intermediate angles. At 188 g and 15.9 mm thick when closed, it’s slightly heavier than a traditional smartphone but remains pocket-friendly. There’s no IP68 rating like on some slab phones, but Motorola has added IP48 protection, meaning it can withstand dust and the occasional splash without worry. It’s solidly built, with no creaks or flex, giving off a reassuring sense of precision engineering. The Razr 60 uses a dual-screen setup that makes the flip concept more than just nostalgic flair. Inside is a 6.9-inch LTPO pOLED panel with Full HD+ resolution (2640 × 1080) and a 120 Hz refresh rate. It’s crisp, bright, and vibrant, with a peak brightness around 3000 nits, more than enough for outdoor visibility. Colours are rich but well balanced, and the crease is barely noticeable in regular use. The outer 3.6-inch pOLED display isn’t as expansive as the Ultra’s 4-inch panel, but it’s perfectly functional for quick interactions, checking notifications, controlling music, replying to messages, or even watching short videos. Both screens are protected by Gorilla Glass Victus, and the stereo speakers with Dolby Atmos deliver surprisingly full sound for such a compact phone. Under the hood, Motorola opts for the MediaTek Dimensity 7400X (4 nm). A capable, energy-efficient midrange 5G chipset paired with 8 or 12 GB of RAM and up to 512 GB of storage (UFS 2.2). It’s not a powerhouse, but for everyday tasks like browsing, messaging, streaming, or multitasking, it feels smooth and responsive. The interface runs close to stock Android, free of bloat and unnecessary animations. Where the hardware starts to show its limits is in demanding gaming or sustained workloads. Titles like Honkai Star Rail tend to stutter at higher settings, and the phone can warm up under load, something several reviewers have noted. Still, performance remains consistent for casual use, and Motorola’s thermal management keeps it from overheating in normal scenarios. Running Android 15 with My UX, the Razr 60 maintains Motorola’s signature clean, user-friendly identity. It includes trademark gestures like the double-twist to open the camera or the chop motion to toggle the flashlight, and now adds Moto AI features such as automatic photo optimization, adaptive stabilization for video, and contextual suggestions that anticipate your next move. The only real disappointment is software longevity. Motorola promises three major Android updates and four years of security patches — decent, but well below Samsung’s seven-year commitment for its latest Flip series. That’s the main trade-off for its lower price. Motorola equips the Razr 60 with a 50 MP main sensor (f/1.7, OIS), a 13 MP ultra-wide/macro, and a 32 MP front camera. It’s a flexible and well-rounded setup that captures bright, detailed shots with accurate colours and solid dynamic range. The OIS helps keep handheld video steady, and the flip form factor allows creative angles or a “camcorder mode” by folding the phone halfway. Low-light performance is decent but not class-leading. The smaller sensor and midrange image processing mean detail softens in darker environments, and there’s no dedicated telephoto zoom. Still, for social media, travel photography, and casual use, it performs above expectations at this price point. Despite its slim frame, the Razr 60 houses a 4,500 mAh silicon–carbon battery. Charging is handled by 30 W TurboPower and 15 W wireless charging, refilling the battery from empty in around 70–80 minutes. Energy efficiency is good for its class, though Samsung’s Snapdragon-based rivals remain slightly more optimised under heavy loads. It’s not flawless, the Dimensity 7400X still trails Qualcomm’s latest chips in raw power and efficiency, and Motorola’s shorter update window may concern long-term users. But judged on its own terms, the Razr 60 is one of the most appealing foldables for the price: fun, functional, and refreshingly uncomplicated. Pros Cons Distinctive, premium foldable design with Pantone-certified colour finishes MediaTek Dimensity 7400X trails Snapdragon rivals in efficiency and sustained performance Compact, pocket-friendly form factor with solid stainless-steel hinge Noticeable heat build-up during long gaming sessions IP48 water and dust resistance — better than most midrange foldables 188 g weight and 15.9 mm folded thickness may feel chunky to some users Bright 6.9-inch LTPO pOLED display (3000 nits, 120 Hz) with vibrant colour accuracy Outer display smaller than the Razr 60 Ultra’s 4-inch panel Functional 3.6-inch external AMOLED screen for apps, notifications, and selfies Only three years of OS updates and four of security patches — below industry leaders Clean, near-stock Android 15 interface with classic Motorola gestures No expandable storage (UFS 2.2 only) Useful Moto AI tools: photo enhancement, adaptive video stabilization, contextual prompts Ultra-wide lens weaker in low light with visible noise and softness 50 MP main camera with OIS delivers crisp daylight shots and smooth video Limited camera versatility. No telephoto lens, and night shots lose detail Decent overall photo performance with versatile 13 MP ultra-wide/macro lens Battery efficiency under heavy load slightly below Samsung’s Flip 6 4,500 mAh silicon–carbon battery offers roughly 1.5 days of real-world use The Motorola Razr 60 does not include a 3.5 mm headphone jack Durable materials (Victus glass, metal frame, reinforced hinge) 30 W wired and 15 W wireless charging support Balanced stereo speakers with Dolby Atmos soundstage   ViserMark Labels for the Motorola Razr 60 Please take a look at the following information about the battery performance of the Motorola Razr 60 : Battery Life: The Motorola Razr 60 offers endurance that’s commendable for a compact foldable. In testing, it averaged around 41 hours of active use, translating to roughly a day and a half of real-world runtime for most users. Its 4,500 mAh silicon–carbon battery performs efficiently across everyday tasks like messaging, streaming, and social media, with moderate gaming or camera use rarely demanding a midday top-up. Battery Charging: Motorola equips the Razr 60 with 30 W TurboPower wired charging and 15 W wireless support. A full recharge takes around 70–80 minutes, with the battery reaching 50 percent in roughly 35 minutes using Motorola’s compatible charger. Battery Performance & Efficiency: The Razr 60 consumes approximately 3.6 kWh per year. Its efficiency rating of around 1.0 “leaf” reflects solid but not exceptional tuning. It’s optimised for typical daily use rather than sustained heavy workloads. Specification Overview  - Released Date: April 2025 Body & Build: Dimensions: Unfolded: 171.3 × 74 × 7.3 mm | Folded: 88.1 × 74 × 15.9 mm Weight: 188 g Materials: Plastic front (unfolded), glass front (folded, Gorilla Glass Victus), silicone polymer eco-leather back, aluminium frame (6000 series), stainless-steel hinge Durability: IP48 dust and water resistant (up to 1.5 m for 30 min, splash and dust protection) Display: Main Screen: 6.9 inches LTPO AMOLED, 1B colours, HDR10+, 120 Hz refresh rate Resolution: 1080 × 2640 pixels (~413 ppi) Brightness: Up to 3000 nits (peak) Protection: Gorilla Glass Victus Cover Display: 3.6 inches AMOLED, 90 Hz, HDR10+, 1056 × 1066 pixels (~413 ppi), 1700 nits (peak) Operating System: OS: Android 15 Interface: Motorola My UX with Moto Gestures and Moto AI enhancements Chipset & Performance: Processor: MediaTek Dimensity 7400X (4 nm) CPU: Octa-core (4×2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4×2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) GPU: Mali-G615 MC2 Memory & Storage: Configurations: 256 GB + 8 GB RAM / 256 GB + 12 GB RAM / 512 GB + 12 GB RAM Storage Type: UFS 2.2 Expandable: No microSD slot Connectivity & Features: SIM: Dual SIM (Nano-SIM + eSIM or Dual Nano-SIM, region dependent) 5G: Supported (Sub-6 GHz) Wi-Fi: Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6 or 6e (tri-band, region dependent) Bluetooth: 5.4, A2DP, LE NFC: Yes USB: USB Type-C 2.0 Biometrics: Side-mounted fingerprint sensor Sensors: Accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass Audio: Speakers: Stereo speakers with Dolby Atmos Headphone Jack: No 3.5 mm port Camera System: Rear Cameras: 50 MP (f/1.7, 25 mm wide, 1/1.95", 0.8 µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS) 13 MP (f/2.2, 120˚ ultra-wide/macro, 1/3.0", 1.12 µm, AF) Rear Features: Dual LED flash, HDR, panorama, Pantone Validated colour calibration Rear Video: 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS Front Camera: 32 MP (f/2.4, 25 mm wide, 1/3.14", 0.7 µm, HDR) Front Video: 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps Colours Available: Pantone Gibraltar Sea, Pantone Spring Bud, Pantone Lightest Sky. Performance - HOW WE TEST ViserMark  offers a comprehensive range of battery performance test results based on different criteria and benchmarks for evaluating a smartphone's performance. Our tests are performed using the strictest protocol in a controlled environment to ensure repetition and consistency powered by SmartViser's test auto mation solution viSer . Translating technical specifications into consumer benefits with SmartViser VWS Analytics Studio  is a complementary product to the viSer Test Automation solution. It enhances the viSer user experience and is the fastest way to analyse and view smartphone test results. We have used the interactive dashboard to show you the recent test results and translated them into ViserMark Labels. Join our readers to receive the latest update to our smartphone battery performance scores and performance reviews as soon as we finish testing! Smartphone Battery Performance - FULL TEST RESULTS AND REVIEW ViserMark has put the Motorola Razr 60 through our testing protocol, based on real smartphone usage from 100% battery level down to power off. This includes daily activities, such as calls, web, video and music streaming, gaming, social networks, picture and video capture, and standby. All activities are executed in a defined order and timeline.   These test results, show how the Motorola Razr 60 performed and the scores achieved. 1. Battery Performance The Motorola Razr 60  achieved a battery performance score of 43/100, placing it nearly on par with both the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 6 (44) and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6 (44), while outperforming the flagship average (41.6). This result confirms that Motorola’s latest clamshell can confidently stand beside pricier foldables in overall endurance, offering well-balanced longevity despite its compact 4,500 mAh battery. Charging is handled through 30 W wired TurboPower and 15 W wireless support. Motorola’s advertised “half-charge in around 35 minutes” holds true in real testing, with a full recharge taking roughly 70–80 minutes. While not class-leading, the dual-charging convenience (wired and wireless) adds everyday practicality. There’s no reverse-charging function, which keeps it aligned with most mid-range foldables rather than premium flagships. Overall, the Razr 60  delivers dependable, well-tuned endurance with efficient standby consumption and balanced power draw. It won’t dethrone Samsung’s latest Flip in sheer optimisation, but it’s a strong showing that demonstrates Motorola’s progress in battery engineering, a foldable that performs consistently without demanding constant recharges. 2. Battery Life In ViserMark’s battery life testing, the Motorola Razr 60  achieved 41 hours of active usage, equivalent to roughly 1.5 days of typical real-world use. This places it slightly ahead of the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 6 (38 hours), nearly matching the Galaxy Z Fold 6   (43 hours), and comfortably above the flagship average (40.5 hours). For a compact clamshell foldable, this is a strong showing, proof that Motorola’s efficiency tuning and silicon-carbon battery chemistry pay off in everyday scenarios. The phone’s stamina stems from its 4,500 mAh cell paired with the MediaTek Dimensity 7400X chipset. While it handles light workloads like messaging, streaming, and browsing efficiently, power draw increases under heavier conditions such as gaming or extended camera use, consistent with most MediaTek foldables. Even so, the Razr 60 maintains dependable all-day performance without anxiety about mid-day top-ups. For most users, the Razr 60  easily covers a full day plus a comfortable buffer into the next, putting it on par with Samsung’s foldables and just shy of the best endurance performers in the premium category. While it doesn’t quite hit two-day territory, Motorola’s latest flip remains a reliable travel and daily companion with well-balanced battery management. 3.   Battery Consumption Based on ViserMark’s measured current consumption data, the Motorola Razr 60  demonstrates notably lower power draw across nearly all major usage categories compared with the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6 , reflecting stronger overall optimisation for everyday efficiency. The Razr 60 consumes roughly half the current of the Fold 6 during social media and outgoing call scenarios, suggesting Motorola’s firmware and display tuning are better calibrated for light, continuous workloads. Similar gains are seen in gaming, downloads/uploads, YouTube, Media Player and Web browsing where the Razr maintains nearly identical visual endurance despite a smaller internal battery. The only areas where the Galaxy Z Fold 6 performs more efficiently are camera usage and replay. These gaps suggest that Samsung’s image processing pipeline and multimedia handling are slightly better optimised for intensive visual tasks, possibly due to Qualcomm’s more mature power scaling under high-performance loads. Even so, across the broader test suite, the Razr 60 maintains a clear advantage in sustained, real-world efficiency, delivering competitive endurance despite its smaller battery capacity. When comparing the Motorola Razr 60  with the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 6 , the data reveals two premium clamshell foldables with similar design philosophies but subtly different energy profiles. Despite both featuring comparable battery capacities (4,500 mAh for the Razr 60 vs 4,000 mAh for the Flip 6 ), their optimisation approaches diverge noticeably. The Razr 60  demonstrates greater efficiency across most everyday scenarios, including social media, outgoing calls, gaming, downloads/uploads, media playback, and web browsing. These results show Motorola’s superior optimisation for continuous, screen-on workloads such as messaging, streaming, and casual gaming, where it consistently draws less power than Samsung’s Snapdragon-based Flip 6 . The Galaxy Z Flip 6 , on the other hand, proves more efficient in camera, YouTube, and replay tests. This demonstrates Samsung’s superior optimisation for image processing, video playback, and post-capture handling, where its Snapdragon hardware and software integration achieve lower power draw under visually intensive workloads. Overall, the Motorola Razr 60  stands out as the more energy-conscious foldable for everyday use — efficient across communication, browsing, and entertainment — and its slightly larger 4,500 mAh battery further extends its practical endurance. Meanwhile, the Galaxy Z Flip 6  remains better tuned for heavy content creation, offering leaner power use where performance and visual output take priority. When comparing battery efficiency across the Motorola Razr 60 , Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 6 , Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6 , and the Flagship/Pro Tier average, clear differences emerge in how each device manages power across real-world use cases. The Motorola Razr 60  demonstrates one of the most balanced and efficient profiles in its class. It consumes less power than both Samsung foldables in the majority of daily tasks — notably social media, outgoing calls, gaming, downloads/uploads, media playback, and web browsing — suggesting Motorola’s optimisation focuses on steady endurance and efficient handling of screen-on activities. By contrast, the Galaxy Z Flip 6  and Z Fold 6  show higher current draw, particularly in social media and outgoing calls, where their power-hungry Snapdragon chips contribute to steeper consumption peaks. The Fold 6 does perform better in camera, YouTube, and replay tasks, where Samsung’s integrated image pipeline and multimedia tuning deliver better energy management during heavy visual workloads. Compared to the Flagship/Pro Tier average, the Razr 60  sits comfortably competitive. Its results point to a refined software–hardware balance, achieving solid endurance despite its compact flip form factor. 4.   Battery Efficiency In ViserMark’s battery efficiency evaluation, the Motorola Razr 60  achieved a 1 leaf rating, placing it level with the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6  but below the Galaxy Z Flip 6 (1.5 leaves) and the flagship average of 0.98 leaves. This suggests that while the Razr 60 delivers strong endurance for its compact size, it isn’t among the most finely optimised foldables when it comes to power management. The result reflects a tuning strategy that prioritises consistent, real-world stability over aggressive energy saving. Motorola’s optimisation avoids erratic power draw or throttling under load, but it doesn’t match Samsung’s efficiency gains in sustained tasks such as gaming or video playback. Still, the Razr 60 balances performance and endurance well, offering reliable battery behaviour across daily workloads rather than chasing benchmark efficiency figures. 5.   Annual Energy Consumption According to ViserMark’s annual energy testing, the Motorola Razr 60  consumes approximately 3.6 kWh per year, placing it slightly above the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 6 (3.4 kWh) and Galaxy Z Fold 6 (3.3 kWh), yet still below the flagship average of 3.79 kWh. This positions the Razr 60 in the upper-middle range for foldable energy efficiency, solid, though not class-leading. This result underscores Motorola’s approach of prioritising balanced performance and steady endurance over extreme energy optimisation. The Razr 60 draws marginally more power than Samsung’s best-tuned foldables, but its consumption remains well-controlled considering the dual-display setup and compact form factor. For everyday users, this translates into a dependable all-day experience with only a modest sustainability trade-off. While the Razr 60 isn’t the most frugal clamshell on the market, it offers reliable efficiency and endurance harmony, proving that Motorola’s engineering choices strike a practical middle ground between power and performance. Who Should Buy the Motorola Razr 60 ? The Motorola Razr 60 is best suited for users who want the foldable experience without the flagship price tag. People who value design, practicality, and everyday performance more than sheer technical muscle. It’s a phone made for those who appreciate innovation in form, not just in specs, and who see the flip design as a lifestyle choice rather than a novelty. With its refined clamshell build, Pantone-certified finishes, and stainless-steel hinge, the Razr 60 appeals to design-conscious users who want something compact, stylish, and distinct from the sea of slab phones. It’s ideal for urban professionals, trendsetters, and casual tech enthusiasts who want a modern device that feels premium but isn’t over-engineered. The 6.9-inch LTPO AMOLED inner display and 3.6-inch cover screen make it practical in daily life, perfect for quick checks, navigation, selfies, or calls without unfolding. Meanwhile, the 4,500 mAh silicon–carbon battery offers reliable all-day use, easily lasting 1.5 days for moderate users, and the combination of 30W wired and 15W wireless charging ensures flexible top-ups at home or on the go. Performance from the MediaTek Dimensity 7400X and up to 12 GB RAM keeps things smooth for social apps, multitasking, and entertainment, while the clean Android 15 experience and Moto gestures (chop for flashlight, twist for camera) maintain Motorola’s signature simplicity. It’s also a strong fit for users who prefer a minimal, near-stock Android experience without bloatware or intrusive skins. That said, the Razr 60 isn’t built for everyone. Power users and heavy gamers may find its MediaTek chipset less capable under stress, and photographers looking for flagship-grade low-light performance or telephoto versatility will need to look higher up the range. Its software support window (three OS updates, four years of security patches) is shorter than Samsung’s, and there’s no expandable storage or headphone jack. In short, the Motorola Razr 60 is for people who want style, practicality, and personality in one foldable, a well-balanced daily driver that brings the flip form factor to a wider audience. It’s not for spec-chasers or hardcore users, but for anyone who values design elegance, functional innovation, and solid all-round performance, it’s one of the most appealing foldables in its class. ViserMark VERDICT The Motorola Razr 60 doesn’t chase flagship dominance, it focuses on delivering what most people actually want in a foldable: a stylish, practical design, smooth performance, and dependable battery life without the Ultra-tier price. Its clamshell build feels sturdy and premium, with Pantone-certified finishes, a reinforced stainless-steel hinge, and IP48 protection offering reassurance against everyday wear. The design strikes the right balance between playful and functional, giving the flip format genuine everyday usability. The 6.9-inch LTPO AMOLED inner screen is sharp, bright, and fluid at 120Hz, while the 3.6-inch external display makes quick replies, calls, and selfies effortless. Together, they make the Razr 60 practical beyond its nostalgic appeal. Performance from the Dimensity 7400X is smooth for daily tasks, social media, and multitasking, though it’s not a powerhouse, gaming and sustained workloads will reveal its limits. The 50 MP main camera with OIS and 13 MP ultra-wide deliver bright, accurate shots in good light, but night and zoom performance remain average. The 4,500 mAh battery is another highlight, easily lasting a day and a half of mixed use, with 30W wired and 15W wireless charging keeping it flexible. Motorola’s My UX on Android 15 remains clean, fast, and free of bloat, with signature gestures that make everyday use intuitive. The Razr 60 isn’t built for power users or camera enthusiasts, it’s for those who want style, simplicity, and practicality in a modern foldable. Confident, compact, and reliable, it proves that you don’t need an Ultra price tag to enjoy the flip experience done right. VCX (Valued Camera eXperience) The VCX Forum  has been working with its members on the system and infrastructure as a non-profit organisation. We strive to improve our technology to develop and exchange accurate and objective quality and performance indicators, which is our ultimate goal. We will also serve as a compass for the smartphone camera industry. We appreciate your interest in the VCX Forum. VCX Forum: No review Background Motorola  is a well-established and innovative technology company known for its contributions to the telecommunications industry. Founded in 1928, Motorola has a rich history of pioneering achievements, including the development of the first handheld mobile phone. Today, the company continues to produce a wide range of consumer electronics, with a focus on smartphones that offer reliable performance, innovative features, and value for money. Motorola's smartphones are known for their durability, user-friendly interfaces, and strong battery life, making them a popular choice for consumers worldwide. Written by Marcella Frattari   is the Communication Marketing and Lead Generation Manager at SmartViser, playing a key role in shaping the company's communication and marketing strategies. With a background in journalism and a passion for digital communication, Marcella focuses on improving SmartViser's overall online presence and engagement. Her dedication to clear, effective communication and creative content makes her a valuable asset to the team. Press Contact Marcella Frattari: Contact@visermark.com Our Resources ViserMark Scores ViserMark Reviews Success Stories Latest Articles Discover what ViserMark is all about. Read ViserMark's latest in-depth smartphone battery reviews. Discover our main success stories with Telecoms and other industries. Read more articles on our battery life, performance reviews, and test results. Know more Know more Know more Know more

SMARTPHONE TIER: MID TIER Battery Capacity mAh: 5000 Nothing Phone (3a): Efficient, Enduring, and Distinctly Different SMARTPHONE BATTERY PERFORMANCE Based on Price: Mid Tier (€200-€499) Mid  Tier Ranking # 3 Learn more: Quick Summary ViserMark Labels Specifications Know the Test Results ViserMark Verdict Video Review - Soon Available The Nothing Phone (3a) is a refreshingly distinctive mid-range smartphone that leans heavily on design and user experience, while still packing just enough performance and features to make it stand out in a very crowded segment. Positioned as the spiritual successor to the Phone (2a), the 3a doesn’t attempt to be revolutionary but instead smooths out the rough edges of its predecessor. With a brighter display, refined build quality, an additional telephoto camera, and a new approach to AI integration, the Phone (3a) feels like a thoughtful evolution that prioritises usability, aesthetics, and everyday dependability. The design remains the clearest differentiator. Nothing’s transparent philosophy continues here, now with a glass back instead of the polycarbonate panel found on the 2a. The look is cleaner, more premium, and less prone to smudges. The signature Glyph lighting has been simplified compared to the flagship line, but it still delivers a fun, futuristic aesthetic that doubles as functional notifications. At 201 grams and 8.3mm thick, the device feels substantial without being unwieldy, while the new IP64 rating provides added peace of mind against dust and splashes. The frame is still polycarbonate, but its matte finish offers both durability and grip, making the phone comfortable for daily use. Available in Black, White, and a bold Blue option, the Phone (3a) has more personality than the typical glass-slab mid-ranger. The display also receives meaningful upgrades. The 6.77-inch AMOLED panel retains its FHD+ resolution and 120Hz refresh rate, but brightness levels have been significantly boosted. With peaks of up to 3,000 nits (around 1,200 in realistic outdoor use), the 3a’s screen is far easier to view in direct sunlight compared to its predecessor. Colours remain punchy without being overdone, and the option to toggle between more saturated or natural profiles adds flexibility. While it lacks LTPO technology for fully dynamic refresh rate scaling, scrolling and animations are consistently smooth. HDR10+ support is present for streaming, though Dolby Vision is still missing. Overall, the display comfortably competes with and often outshines other phones in this price bracket. Performance comes via Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 chipset, paired with either 8GB or 12GB of RAM and up to 256GB of UFS 2.2 storage. This combination ensures a smooth experience in everyday scenarios such as messaging, browsing, and multitasking. Compared to the Dimensity 7200 in the Phone (2a), the Snapdragon chip doesn’t deliver dramatic raw performance gains, but it does bring better energy efficiency and steadier thermals under load. Gaming is acceptable for casual titles, though more demanding 3D games will require lowered settings to run smoothly. Still, for most users, the overall experience is fluid and responsive, with no glaring bottlenecks. Software remains one of Nothing’s biggest strengths. Running Android 15 with Nothing OS 3.1, the interface feels polished, cohesive, and refreshingly free of unnecessary bloat. The design language embraces bold typography, clean widgets, and subtle animations that give the phone a unique character compared to other Android skins. A key addition this year is the Essential Key, a new hardware button placed below the power button, which integrates directly with Essential Space, an AI-driven hub for captures, reminders, and quick notes. A single press takes a screenshot, a long press records a voice note (automatically transcribed), and a double-tap brings up stored items. While still a young feature set, it demonstrates Nothing’s intent to integrate AI into meaningful, practical tools rather than just flashy gimmicks. The company promises three years of OS updates and six years of security patches, solid, though shy of the seven-year support now offered by Google and Samsung. The camera system is where the Phone (3a) delivers its most noticeable hardware upgrade. It now features a triple-lens setup consisting of a 50MP main sensor with OIS, a new 50MP 2× telephoto lens with EIS, and an 8MP ultrawide. The main camera captures vibrant, detailed shots in good lighting with reliable dynamic range, though colours can skew slightly saturated. Low-light performance is aided by OIS, producing usable results but still introducing visible noise in darker areas. The telephoto lens is the star of the show, rare at this price point, providing natural portrait shots and usable zoom up to 4× in daylight. However, it struggles in low-light conditions where noise quickly creeps in. The ultrawide is serviceable for casual use but lags behind in sharpness and colour accuracy. On the video front, 4K/30fps is supported on the main sensor, with stabilisation improved compared to the 2a. The 32MP selfie camera also performs well, producing bright, detailed self-portraits in good light, though it softens details in dimmer scenarios. Battery life continues to impress. With a 5,000mAh cell, the Phone (3a) consistently achieves two days of mixed use, aided by the efficient Snapdragon 7s Gen 3. Independent testing shows around 56 hours of active use, putting it ahead of many rivals in the same tier. Charging is handled via 50W wired charging, bringing the phone to 50% in around 20 minutes and fully recharging in under an hour. Wireless charging is absent, reserved for Nothing’s flagship models; and, like most modern phones, no charger is included in the box. Still, endurance remains one of the 3a’s strongest assets, especially considering its efficiency rating places it among the best in its class. Audio is delivered through stereo speakers, with the earpiece doubling as a secondary driver. Output is loud, balanced enough for casual media, and slightly richer than on the 2a. Haptics are tight and responsive, complementing the Glyph interface’s playful design cues. An under-display fingerprint scanner provides fast and reliable biometric security, while connectivity is well-rounded with 5G, Wi-Fi 6, NFC, and Bluetooth 5.4 all onboard. Ultimately, the Nothing Phone (3a) succeeds by being a mid-range phone that doesn’t feel boring. It doesn’t chase raw specifications or unnecessary gimmicks, but instead refines the essentials with a brighter screen, more versatile cameras, and a software experience that feels carefully crafted. While compromises remain, notably the average ultrawide camera, lack of wireless charging, and shorter software support than its rivals, the Phone (3a) brings personality, design flair, and a sense of polish that few competitors in its segment can match. For users who value a distinctive smartphone that looks and feels different while still delivering dependable day-to-day performance, the Nothing Phone (3a) is a compelling and well-rounded choice. Pros Cons Distinctive transparent design with glass back and Glyph lighting Ultrawide 8MP camera is weak, especially in low light Sharp 6.77-inch AMOLED display with 120Hz refresh rate Telephoto performance drops significantly in dim conditions Peak brightness up to 3,000 nits for strong outdoor visibility No wireless charging (reserved for flagships) 50MP 2× telephoto camera — rare at this price point UFS 2.2 storage instead of faster UFS 3.1/4.0 Solid 5,000mAh battery with reliable 2-day endurance AI features in Essential Space feel basic and unfinished Smooth daily performance with Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 Display lacks LTPO tech and Dolby Vision support Clean, bloat-free Nothing OS 3.1 on Android 15 Software support lags behind Google and Samsung’s 7-year updates Practical Essential Key + Essential Space AI integration Stereo speakers and responsive under-display fingerprint scanner Promised 3 years of OS updates and 6 years of security patches   ViserMark Labels for the Nothing Phone (3a) Please take a look at the following information about the battery performance of the Nothing Phone (3a) : Battery Life: The Nothing Phone (3a) stands out in the mid-range space with an endurance of around 56 hours of active use, which translates to a solid two days of real-world use for most people. Whether you’re streaming, scrolling through social media, navigating with GPS, or mixing in some gaming, the 5,000mAh cell holds up well. The Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 chipset, paired with Nothing’s clean OS, ensures efficient power distribution without big spikes in drain. In short, it’s the kind of phone you don’t have to babysit with a charger every night. Battery Charging: On paper, the Nothing Phone (3a) supports 50W wired charging (USB PD 3.0), with claims of a full charge in under an hour. In testing, a full charge took around 1 hour and 50 minutes using a compatible fast charger. This makes it fine for overnight charging or planned top-ups but far from the rapid charging speeds offered by some rivals. Adding to that, Nothing doesn’t include a charger in the box, so buyers will need to source their own to take advantage of the maximum charging rate. Battery Performance & Efficiency: Independent testing puts the Phone (3a)’s annual energy consumption at just 2.9 kWh, matching some of the most efficient mid-range devices available. Its 1.5 “leaves” efficiency rating highlights how well-optimised the balance is between power draw and performance. In daily use, this translates to dependable, consistent stamina, even if you’re leaning on the brighter display outdoors or dipping into camera-heavy usage, the battery rarely shows sudden drops. For users who prioritise long-lasting, efficient power, the Nothing Phone (3a) delivers one of the best-rounded experiences in its class. Specification Overview  - Released Date: March 2025 Body & Build: Dimensions: 163.52 × 77.5 × 8.35 mm Weight: 201 g Materials: Glass back, plastic frame Durability: IP64 (dust-tight and splash-resistant) Display: Size: 6.77-inch AMOLED Resolution: 2392 × 1080, ~388 ppi, 20:9 Refresh Rate: 120Hz (non-adaptive) Brightness: 3000 nits peak, real-world ~1200 nits at 20% APL HDR Support: HDR10+ supported Protection: Panda Glass Operating System: OS: Android 15 with Nothing OS 3.1 Software Support: Up to 3 major Android upgrades (brand policy) Chipset & Performance: Processor: Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 (4 nm)  CPU: Octa-core (1×2.5 GHz Cortex-A720 + 3×2.4 GHz Cortex-A720 + 4×1.8 GHz Cortex-A520) GPU: Adreno 710 Memory & Storage: Configurations: 8 GB / 128 GB, 12 GB / 256 GB Expandable: No microSD slot Connectivity & Features: SIM: Dual Nano-SIM 5G: Supported (Sub-6 GHz) Wi-Fi: Wi-Fi 6, dual-band Bluetooth: 5.4 NFC: Supported (region-dependent) USB: Type-C Biometrics: Optical in-display fingerprint sensor Sensors: Accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass Audio: Speakers: Stereo speakers (phones use earpiece + bottom-fired) Headphone Jack: None Camera System: Rear Cameras: 50 MP main (f/1.9, 1/1.57", OIS) 50 MP 2× telephoto (f/2.0) 8 MP ultrawide (f/2.2) Front Camera: 32 MP (f/2.2) Video Recording: Rear up to 4K@30fps, front 1080p@30fps Colours Available: White and Black. Performance - HOW WE TEST ViserMark  offers a comprehensive range of battery performance test results based on different criteria and benchmarks for evaluating a smartphone's performance. Our tests are performed using the strictest protocol in a controlled environment to ensure repetition and consistency powered by SmartViser's test auto mation solution viSer . Translating technical specifications into consumer benefits with SmartViser VWS Analytics Studio  is a complementary product to the viSer Test Automation solution. It enhances the viSer user experience and is the fastest way to analyse and view smartphone test results. We have used the interactive dashboard to show you the recent test results and translated them into ViserMark Labels. Join our readers to receive the latest update to our smartphone battery performance scores and performance reviews as soon as we finish testing! Smartphone Battery Performance - FULL TEST RESULTS AND REVIEW ViserMark has put the Nothing Phone (3a) through our testing protocol, based on real smartphone usage from 100% battery level down to power off. This includes daily activities, such as calls, web, video and music streaming, gaming, social networks, picture and video capture, and standby. All activities are executed in a defined order and timeline.   These test results, show how the Nothing Phone (3a) performed and the scores achieved. 1. Battery Performance The Nothing Phone (3a)  achieved a battery performance score of 51/100, putting it on par with the CMF Phone 2 Pro (50) and comfortably above the mid-tier average of 44.52. While the difference between the 3a and CMF 2 Pro is marginal, both devices rank among the more efficient mid-range smartphones available. By contrast, the Sony Xperia 10 V 5G trails significantly behind at 28, underscoring the 3a’s stronger optimisation and real-world reliability. Charging is handled via 50W wired power delivery (USB PD 3.0), with Nothing advertising a full charge in under an hour. In testing, however, a complete refill took closer to 1 hour and 50 minutes with a compatible fast charger, making it adequate but not class-leading. As expected, no charger is included in the box, which may frustrate some buyers who prefer a complete setup out of the gate. There’s also no support for wireless or reverse charging, keeping the 3a aligned with typical mid-range compromises. Overall, the Nothing Phone (3a) combines dependable two-day stamina with measured efficiency, making it a compelling choice for users who value endurance without sacrificing day-to-day responsiveness. While charging speeds could be sharper, its overall energy-to-performance optimisation ensures it holds its ground as one of the stronger mid-range options in 2025. 2. Battery Life In ViserMark’s battery life testing, the Nothing Phone (3a) achieved 56 hours of active usage, translating to about two full days of typical use. This result positions it among the best in the mid-range category, essentially on par with the CMF Phone 2 Pro (55 hours) and comfortably ahead of the mid-tier average of around 46 hours. By contrast, devices such as the Sony Xperia 10 V 5G (33 hours) fall well short, highlighting the 3a’s efficient optimisation. This performance reflects the strong integration of the Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 chipset with Nothing OS 3.2, which together deliver not only smooth task handling but also effective background power management. The result is consistent stamina that holds up well across varied usage patterns, from streaming and browsing to gaming and camera work. For users who prioritise reliable day-to-day endurance, the Nothing Phone (3a) provides genuine peace of mind, easily lasting through demanding schedules without forcing mid-day top-ups. Its robust battery life makes it one of the most practical mid-range smartphones currently available. 3.   Battery Consumption The Nothing Phone (3a)  generally consumes more power than the Sony Xperia 10 V 5G  in categories such as social media, outgoing calls, YouTube, and camera use, indicating a heavier energy demand during communication and media-heavy tasks. This suggests the 3a isn’t always the most finely tuned for prolonged screen-on or network-intensive sessions. Interestingly, in gaming, the Nothing Phone (3a) is the more efficient device, drawing less current than the Xperia. This may point to better optimisation in GPU load handling and thermal management under sustained graphical stress. For downloads/uploads, web browsing, and media playback, the two phones remain closely matched, with only small differences that are unlikely to translate into major real-world endurance gaps. Despite identical 5,000 mAh batteries, the 3a ultimately delivers longer overall stamina in ViserMark’s testing, reflecting more effective system-level optimisation rather than sheer capacity. When comparing the Nothing Phone (3a)  with the Nothing CMF Phone 2 Pro , the data highlights how two devices from the same brand, both positioned in the mid-tier and packing 5,000mAh batteries, can deliver noticeably different efficiency profiles. The CMF Phone 2 Pro   shows higher power consumption in areas like social media, outgoing calls, downloads/uploads, web browsing, media playback, and gaming, which suggests its tuning prioritises responsiveness and raw activity handling, even at the cost of endurance. By contrast, the Nothing Phone (3a) is more frugal across these categories, giving it a clear advantage for users who spend much of their time online, messaging, or multitasking throughout the day. By contrast, the Nothing Phone (3a)  proves more efficient across those same categories, giving it the advantage for users who spend much of their time online, streaming music, or multitasking. However, the balance shifts with camera use and YouTube, where the Phone (3a) consumes more power than the CMF Phone 2 Pro, highlighting areas where Nothing’s mid-tier refinement could still improve. The Nothing Phone (3a) is more efficient than the CMF Phone 2 Pro in most day-to-day tasks, though heavier drain appears in camera and YouTube use. Overall, it’s a dependable all-rounder for battery life, offering reliable stamina for everyday users. When comparing battery efficiency across the Nothing Phone (3a) , Nothing CMF Phone 2 Pro , Sony Xperia 10 V 5G , and the mid-tier average, clear differences emerge in how each device manages power across real-world tasks. The Nothing Phone (3a) is generally efficient across most categories but stands out for its higher drain in camera use and YouTube, where it consumes more than both the Sony and the CMF. The Sony Xperia 10 V 5G is the weakest in gaming and media playback, where it draws more current than rivals despite having the same 5,000mAh battery. This explains why its real-world endurance lags behind. The Nothing CMF Phone 2 Pro consumes more overall than the other two devices across most daily tasks. Its only relative advantages come in camera use (less drain than both the 3a and Xperia) and YouTube (less drain than the 3a, though still higher than mid-tier averages). Among the three, the Nothing Phone (3a)  is the most balanced day-to-day performer, efficient in most workloads but held back by heavier drain in camera and video streaming. The Sony Xperia 10 V 5G  struggles in gaming and media playback, while the CMF Phone 2 Pro  is the most power-hungry overall, only showing restraint in camera and YouTube use. 4.   Battery Efficiency In ViserMark’s battery efficiency evaluation, the Nothing Phone (3a)  achieved a 1.5-leaf rating, matching the Nothing CMF Phone 2 Pro  at the top of the mid-tier bracket and standing clearly above the category average of 1.09 leaves. In contrast, the Sony Xperia 10 V 5G  trailed far behind at just 0.5 leaves, underlining its weaker optimisation despite identical battery capacity. The Phone (3a) ’s strong score reflects well-balanced hardware–software tuning, with Nothing OS and the Dimensity 7-series platform working together to reduce unnecessary drain. This efficiency allows the device to deliver dependable endurance without relying solely on raw battery size. Unlike rivals that compensate for poor optimisation with aggressive standby savings or oversized batteries, the Nothing Phone (3a)  demonstrates genuine consistency in its power management. It ensures smooth performance and reliable battery life, positioning it as one of the most efficient mid-range devices available in 2025. 5.   Annual Energy Consumption According to ViserMark’s annual energy testing, the Nothing Phone (3a)  records an impressively low consumption of just 2.9 kWh per year, placing it among the most efficient smartphones in its class. It matches the Nothing CMF Phone 2 Pro  and sits well below the mid-tier average of 3.59 kWh, while the Sony Xperia 10 V 5G  consumes significantly more at 4.9 kWh annually. This result underscores the Phone (3a) ’s well-optimised hardware–software balance, ensuring that power is used effectively whether during active use or in standby. By keeping unnecessary drain to a minimum, it delivers both consistent endurance and reduced long-term energy costs. For users conscious of efficiency and sustainability, the Nothing Phone (3a)  not only ensures dependable day-to-day battery life but also represents a more environmentally considerate choice in the mid-range segment. Who Should Buy the Nothing Phone (3a) ? The Nothing Phone (3a)  is a strong pick for users who want a mid-range smartphone that combines distinctive design, dependable performance, and excellent battery life without feeling generic. It’s especially appealing for those who value clean software and long-lasting endurance over raw specs or gimmicks. With its transparent glass back, Glyph lighting, and refined build, the Phone (3a) stands out in a crowded segment as one of the few mid-rangers with a true design identity. Its brighter AMOLED display, two-day battery stamina, and balanced Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 performance make it a reliable daily driver for students, professionals, and casual users alike. The addition of a 50MP telephoto camera, rare at this price point, makes it a solid choice for anyone who enjoys portrait photography or wants more versatility than the standard main + ultrawide combo. Combined with Nothing OS 3.1’s clean, bloat-free interface and the new Essential Key + AI integration, the Phone (3a) also appeals to those looking for a polished, fuss-free software experience. However, it may not fully satisfy heavy gamers or camera purists, as demanding 3D titles require lowered settings and the ultrawide camera remains weak compared to rivals. The lack of wireless charging and only three years of OS updates also limit its future-proofing compared to longer-supported alternatives. In short, the Nothing Phone (3a) is for users who want a stylish, efficient, and dependable mid-range phone that looks and feels different, delivers reliable two-day stamina, and offers just enough extra features, like telephoto zoom and a brighter display, to keep it from blending into the crowd. ViserMark VERDICT Using the Nothing Phone (3a)  is a reminder that mid-range smartphones don’t have to be bland or forgettable. From its transparent glass back and Glyph lighting to its refined build, it offers personality alongside practicality. The 6.77-inch AMOLED display is a highlight, with excellent brightness for outdoor use and a fluid 120Hz refresh rate that makes navigation smooth and enjoyable. Paired with Nothing OS 3.1 on Android 15, the experience feels clean, bloat-free, and polished, striking a balance between minimalism and everyday usability. Battery life is a standout strength. The 5,000mAh cell consistently delivers around two days of real-world use, with ViserMark measuring 56 hours of active usage. While charging is capped at 50W wired, real-world testing showed it takes closer to 1h 50m for a full refill, which is adequate but less impressive than rivals that genuinely hit faster speeds. As expected, no charger is included in the box. Performance, powered by the Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, is more than sufficient for daily tasks like social media, browsing, messaging, and multitasking. It’s not a powerhouse for heavy gaming, but for most users, it runs smoothly without significant slowdowns. The addition of a 50MP telephoto lens is a rare mid-range perk, giving users more flexibility in photography, even if the ultrawide remains a weak point. Overall, the Nothing Phone (3a)  succeeds in delivering a dependable, efficient, and stylish daily driver. It doesn’t overpromise or chase gimmicks but instead focuses on solid fundamentals, excellent endurance, a bright display, clean software, and unique design, making it one of the most balanced and enjoyable mid-range smartphones of 2025. VCX (Valued Camera eXperience) The VCX Forum  has been working with its members on the system and infrastructure as a non-profit organisation. We strive to improve our technology to develop and exchange accurate and objective quality and performance indicators, which is our ultimate goal. We will also serve as a compass for the smartphone camera industry. We appreciate your interest in the VCX Forum. VCX Forum: No review Background Founded in October 2020 by Carl Pei, co‑founder of OnePlus, Nothing Technology Limited  (stylised as NOTHING ) is a   London ‑based consumer electronics company with a mission: to make technology “fun again” through distinctive design, transparent aesthetics, and clean software experiences. In August 2023, Nothing introduced the CMF by Nothing sub‑brand (CMF stands for Color, Material, Finish ) to broaden its accessible design-led product lineup. This brand is behind the CMF Phone 1, CMF Watch Pro, and eventually the CMF Phone 2 Pro, launched in April 2025 as an entry‑level smartphone with premium styling and long‑term software support. Written by Marcella Frattari   is the Communication Marketing and Lead Generation Manager at SmartViser, playing a key role in shaping the company's communication and marketing strategies. With a background in journalism and a passion for digital communication, Marcella focuses on improving SmartViser's overall online presence and engagement. Her dedication to clear, effective communication and creative content makes her a valuable asset to the team. Press Contact Marcella Frattari: Contact@visermark.com Our Resources ViserMark Scores ViserMark Reviews Success Stories Latest Articles Discover what ViserMark is all about. Read ViserMark's latest in-depth smartphone battery reviews. Discover our main success stories with Telecoms and other industries. Read more articles on our battery life, performance reviews, and test results. Know more Know more Know more Know more

If you’ve ever felt your phone getting warmer than your morning coffee during a summer day, you’re not imagining things. You’re streaming video or gaming on a new 5G smartphone, and before long the device feels uncomfortably warm. In the early days of 5G, some phones had warning high-temperature messages or shut down within minutes of heavy use on a 5G network. Fast-forward to 2025, and both networks and devices have evolved. Are today’s 5G handsets finally cooling down, or is the heat here to stay?  5G and Overheating: Why Your Phone Runs Hot When 5G first rolled out, overheating became a real headache for smartphone makers and users alike. The technical leap from 4G to 5G came with trade-offs, notably, higher power draw. Early 5G modems and antennas demanded much more energy to deliver super-fast speeds, and that energy turned into heat inside the phone. Unlike 4G, 5G uses techniques like massive MIMO (multiple antennas) and beamforming to maintain a strong signal, especially at higher frequencies. Those extra antennas and processing workloads meant phones could heat up fast. In fact, one report in 2019 found Qualcomm’s first-gen 5G phones would hit thermal shutdown after just a few minutes in warm weather, dropping back to 4G to save themselves. In other words, 5G’s blazing speeds were literally too hot to handle for those first devices. By 2020-2022, the issue was prominent enough that SmartViser decided to investigate. SmartViser’s original 2022 study, tellingly titled “ Can They Handle the Heat of 5G? ” , pu t some first-wave 5G smartphones through their paces in a controlled lab. The findings were eye-opening: even in a cool 16 °C air-conditioned lab with solid 5G coverage, several phones overheated in under 20 minutes of continuous 5G data transfer. The devices generally fell into three groups: Group 1:  Some phones stayed stable , no overheating at all, maintaining performance as normal. Group 2:  Others hit around 48 °C within 20 minutes , triggering on-screen overheating warnings and noticeable slowdowns. Group 3:  The rest actually throttled performance or dropped from 5G to 4G  to cool off. These phones overheated at about the 20-minute mark and automatically took drastic measures, like closing background apps and switching down to 4G , in order to protect themselves. This 2022 snapshot confirmed that 5G could worsen overheating compared to 4G. It wasn’t unique to 5G, any heavy task can warm a phone, but the mix of high data speeds, new radio tech, and immature thermal designs made it a “perfect storm.” Progress Since 2022: Better Networks, Smarter Chips The good news is that 2025’s 5G landscape looks very different from those early days. On the network side, 5G itself has matured. Carriers worldwide have expanded mid-band 5G coverage, providing consistently fast speeds without relying solely on the ultra-high-frequency mmWave signals that stressed phones out. In fact, mid-band 5G in 2025 delivers hundreds of Mbps in real-world average speeds (e.g. ~270–380 Mbps across much of Europe) with far more consistent connections than early deployments. This steadier coverage means phones no longer have to constantly hunt for signal or push their transmitters to the limit, which can indirectly cut heat. Still, faster networks let devices pull huge amounts of data, and processing it all can keep thermals high. On the hardware side, today’s 5G phones are built with heat control in mind. Flagship chipsets on 5nm or 4nm processes waste less energy as heat, while upgraded cooling designs, vapor chambers, heat pipes, graphene composite sheets, larger aluminium frames, spread and dissipate heat more effectively than older solutions. These changes let devices sustain performance for longer, with some models even enlarging vapor chambers year-over-year to handle prolonged loads. Software has caught up too: Android and iOS now coordinate closely with chipsets and thermal sensors, throttling heavy tasks, shifting workloads to cooler cores, or moderating modem use before temperatures spike. In 2025, consistent overheating on 5G is treated as a design flaw, and even many mid-range phones now benefit from scaled-down versions of flagship cooling tech. What Our 2025 Tests Revealed SmartViser’s latest 2025 study , using viSer automation tools , shows a clear leap forward since 2022. Back then, overheating shutdowns or abrupt drops to 4G were common; now, most devices employ layered, adaptive thermal controls thanks to closer integration between chipset, OS, and thermal management algorithms. Overheating failures are now rare, but not gone. A few models, generally budget or mid-tier phones with less advanced cooling, still triggered high-temperature warnings that temporarily limited user interaction. In extreme scenarios, even flagship devices can hit thermal ceilings, but they typically manage heat invisibly to the user before it gets that far. In a one-hour web browsing test, our 2025 device stayed on 5G for 98% of the session, maintained fast and stable page loading, and avoided CPU slowdowns. As heat built up, it selectively reduced power on certain uplink and mid-band 5G frequencies to lower RF load, preventing temperature spikes without impacting the experience. SmartViser Analytics Studio PS RAT Graph and Battery Temperature SmartViser Analytics Studio Web Browsing Loading Time and CPU Frequencies Three-hour 5G gaming sessions pushed every device to eventually fall back to 4G, with peak temperatures between 40°C and 48°C depending on cooling design and chipset efficiency. Flagships generally ran cooler, but all models used similar strategies: multi-step CPU/GPU throttling, seamless network fallback, and background process culling. The result was smoother gameplay under stress, with fewer abrupt drops in performance compared to earlier 5G generations. SmartViser Analytics Studio PS RAT and temperature graph Sustained, high-volume 5G downloads pushed some devices to their limits in as little as 26 minutes, triggering overheat warnings, and in a few severe cases, shutdowns above 50°C. Most phones, including flagships, avoided failure through progressive throttling and 4G fallback, but these edge cases prove that any smartphone can be pushed past its thermal safety margins. SmartViser Analytics Studio CPU Frequency and Throughput DL Graph SmartViser Analytics Studio Battery Temperature and Throughput upload graph Everyday 5G use, browsing, streaming, social media, is now largely free of the overheating drama seen in early 5G devices. Budget and mid-tier phones remain more likely to show visible heat warnings, but layered mitigation means most users will never see them. Under extreme loads, however, even the best cooling can only delay the inevitable, physics still applies. Keeping Your 5G Phone Cool in 2025 Modern smartphones are far better at managing heat, but you can still help, especially during heavy use: Watch the environment:  Avoid direct sunlight or leaving your phone on heat-absorbing surfaces. Even advanced cooling struggles in 35°C+ ambient temps. Pace your sessions:  Long gaming, streaming, or tethering? Take short breaks and, if possible, lower graphics settings or frame rates. Limit background load:  Close unused apps, disable radios you don’t need, and pause big downloads until you’re done with demanding tasks. Case check:  Remove thick or insulating cases during intense use to let heat escape. Avoid 5G + fast charging:  Charge first or slow-charge if you need to stay on 5G for heavy work. Use built-in tools:  Battery saver, performance modes, or gaming cooling settings can all reduce heat. Keep your software updated for the latest thermal tweaks. In everyday 5G use, you won’t need to think about cooling, but for long, high-load sessions, these small adjustments can keep your phone comfortable and performance steady. The Road Ahead: Cooling the Future of 5G Looking ahead, keeping phones cool remains a moving target. The next wave of connectivity, 5G-Advanced, promises higher speeds, new frequencies, and more complex use cases. Extended reality (XR), AI-heavy apps, and cloud gaming will push devices harder than ever. Imagine AR glasses tethered to a phone or a constant high-resolution game stream that also tracks real-time inputs, both scenarios tax the modem and processors as much as our toughest stress tests. Performance gains will only matter if paired with equally advanced cooling and power management. The progress since early 5G days is remarkable: phones that once throttled within minutes can now sustain hours of heavy use thanks to smarter thermal controls. Emerging solutions, ultrathin vapor chambers, graphene pads, even miniature fans, are edging closer to mainstream. More efficient chips and network load balancing will further reduce heat without sacrificing speed. For buyers, this means cautious optimism. A well-designed 2025 phone can handle everyday 5G without issue. But as devices take on ambitious roles, mixed-reality headsets, real-time 4K streaming, competitive mobile gaming, thermal engineering remains a core design challenge. The best models we tested struck an impressive balance between performance, battery life, and safety. In short, overheating has shifted from a widespread problem to a managed risk. Your 2025 handset won’t spontaneously shut down under normal conditions, it’s actively working to prevent that. Physics still applies: high speeds in small enclosures generate heat. Users can help by avoiding extreme scenarios, while manufacturers keep innovating in cooling. So the next time you fire up a demanding game or kick off a massive 5G download, your phone should handle it just fine, as long as you don’t decide to sunbathe it on a beach towel. Written By: Marcella Frattari  is the Digital Communications Manager at SmartViser, primarily responsible for ViserMark content creation and social media management. She holds a journalism background and is pursuing a master's degree in digital communications and marketing. Marcella brings a dynamic and creative approach to her work, consistently striving to enhance the company's online presence and engagement. Press Contact Marcella Frattari: Contact@visermark.com   Never miss out on our FREE Smartphone Reviews. Add  your email below to sign up for  our monthly newsletter ,   which provides all the latest mobile phones that ViserMark has tried  and tested. No pressure; you can unsubscribe anytime,  and we promise not to fill up your inbox.

Android 15 and Android 16 are two back-to-back releases of Google’s mobile OS, internally codenamed “Vanilla Ice Cream” and “Baklava” respectively. Each new Android version brings a bunch of features, tweaks, and optimizations. But you might wonder: will upgrading actually change my day-to-day experience? Introduction: Same Phone, New OS When you update your phone from Android 15 to Android 16, you’re essentially getting a software makeover. Google often adds visual polish, new functions, and security enhancements with each version. To find out how these changes affect real usage, SmartViser tested both Android 15 and Android 16 on the Google Pixel 8a  under identical conditions. Automatic brightness and battery savers were off, volumes were set equal, and the phone was put through the same tasks on each OS. This way, any differences we observe (in speed, battery life, etc.) can be attributed to the operating system itself and not some random factor. Before diving into numbers, let’s first look at what new features Android 16 brings to the table compared to Android 15, and how those might matter to you as an end user. New Features and Changes in Android 16 vs Android 15 Android 16 builds on the foundation of Android 15 with a more polished look, smoother animations, and subtle effects like blurred menus and richer color theming. While Android 15 refined the Material You design, Android 16’s new Material 3 Expressive UI makes the interface feel livelier and more dynamic; without any performance or battery cost. It’s not a radical redesign, but the small visual tweaks and fluid interactions make the system feel more modern and engaging. Notifications also get smarter. Android 15 introduced a cooldown system to prevent apps from spamming you, but Android 16 takes it further with Live Updates and better organization. Now you can see real-time progress for deliveries, rides, or downloads directly in your notification shade, while alerts are grouped more cleanly by app. The result is less clutter and more useful information at a glance, making everyday phone use smoother and less distracting. For multitasking and media, Android 15 brought split-screen shortcuts and partial screen sharing, but Android 16 takes a big leap with an early desktop-style mode on tablets and foldables. Apps are now forced to adapt to larger screens, so fewer will look like stretched phone apps. Media also gets a boost with HDR screenshots, a unified photo picker with cloud integration, and support for pro-level video formats. On top of that, Android 16 doubles down on security with features like Advanced Protection, USB port blocking, and Offline Lock, while also adding battery health monitoring. Together, these changes make Android 16 a safer, more flexible, and more user-friendly upgrade. Performance and Under-the-Hood Changes Adaptive Scheduling:  Android 16 comes with improved task scheduling and performance optimizations under the hood. This means the system is a bit smarter about managing CPU and background processes, which can lead to more efficient performance and possibly better battery usage for the same tasks. These changes aren’t really visible, but you might notice things like slightly smoother multitasking or marginally faster app launch times in some cases. ART and Archiving:  Android 15 had introduced an updated Android Runtime (ART) with performance tweaks and an app archiving feature. App archiving allows unused apps to be partially “cached” to free up space without uninstalling them completely. Both Android 15 and 16 support this, but Android 16 enforces some of these behaviors more strictly to maintain device efficiency over time. Developer Features:  For completeness, Android 16 also adds some developer-oriented features that indirectly benefit users. For example, predictive back gestures (which Android 15 started) are expanded in 16 to even work with traditional 3-button navigation, giving a preview of the screen you’ll go back to. This can help prevent accidental app exits. There’s also better support for Ultra-Wideband (UWB) and device ranging APIs in Android 16, which could mean more precise tracking for smart tags and such in the future. These aren’t things you’ll notice immediately, but they pave the way for smarter apps and accessories. Real-World Performance Comparison Before jumping into the results, we first leveled the playing field. Both Android 15 and 16 were tested on the same device with voice call volume set to 5, brightness fixed at 11 (no auto-brightness), and music volume at 6. Keeping these parameters identical ensures that any differences in battery life, gaming, browsing, or streaming are due to the operating system itself, not the setup. Web Browsing Speed We loaded a variety of popular websites and measured how quickly the pages became interactively ready (i.e., usable). The difference was negligible: Android 15 averaged ~492 ms per page, while Android 16 averaged ~484 ms. In other words, both versions load pages in roughly half a second on average. The fastest loads on Android 16 were a hair quicker (70 ms vs 80 ms for the very light pages), which suggests some minor improvements in the web rendering engine. However, Android 16 also showed slightly higher worst-case times on a couple pages (a spike up to ~4.3 seconds vs ~4.1 seconds on 15). These occasional slow loads are likely due to network variability rather than the OS itself. In normal web browsing, you won’t notice a difference between Android 15 and 16. Both are snappy and virtually identical in loading speed, with Android 16 perhaps fractionally more consistent. Scrolling and interactions in the browser felt smooth on both, and our data confirms the experience is the same to a human eye. Mobile Data Download/Upload Using a controlled server, we tested HTTP downloads and uploads to see if the network throughput changed. Android 15 showed a slight edge in raw speed, averaging about 46.9 Mbps download and 22.4 Mbps upload, versus 42.9 Mbps download and 21.6 Mbps upload on Android 16. That’s a difference of only a few Mbps, which in real usage (streaming videos, downloading apps, etc.) is barely noticeable — it’s within normal variance. It’s possible that Android 16’s network stack or background tasks used a bit of bandwidth during our test runs, but in everyday scenarios, both versions will feel the same for things like watching YouTube or uploading photos. A download that takes 10 seconds on Android 15 might take about 11 seconds on Android 16 in the absolute worst case given these averages – not exactly a dramatic gap. Most users wouldn’t notice any change in network speed after upgrading. Battery Performance To mimic a normal day, we ran the phones through a mix of gaming, browsing, streaming, file transfers, and standby. Both Android 15 and 16 lasted just over 17 hours and 13 minutes, essentially identical. Power-hungry tasks like gaming drained the most (around -1350 mA on both), while lighter activities such as browsing or streaming showed no real difference. Temperatures stayed steady too, averaging 25.9°C on Android 15 and 26.2°C on Android 16, a negligible gap. In short, upgrading won’t give you extra hours of battery life, but it also won’t take any away. Gaming and Graphics Performance For mobile gamers, even a slight drop or improvement in frame rates is noticeable. We ran a GPU-intensive WebGL game test on both OS versions to measure frames per second (FPS): Android 15: averaged about 52 FPS, with dips to a minimum of 42 FPS in the most intense scenes. Android 16: averaged around 48 FPS, with dips down to 35 FPS at worst. Peak framerates were similar (around 60+ FPS on both, since the device likely caps around 60Hz). However, the lowest  FPS on Android 16 went a bit lower than on 15. In plain terms, Android 15 was roughly 4 frames ahead on average, and handled the stress test slightly more smoothly when the going got tough. This suggests that Android 16’s graphics pipeline might not yet be fully optimized for demanding games, or perhaps some background process in 16 consumed resources during the test. The difference isn’t huge – a casual gamer probably wouldn’t perceive that their game that ran at 52 FPS on Android 15 is now 48 FPS on Android 16. Both are still smooth. But a keen eye might notice a few more minor frame drops on Android 16 in heavy gameplay scenarios. It’s something that could be addressed in future updates (as Google refines drivers and scheduling in Android 16). For most users playing typical mobile games, the experience remains virtually the same. Candy Crush, Subway Surfers, or PUBG Mobile will perform as they did before. Only at the very edge (or perhaps in benchmarks/VR apps) does Android 15 currently hold a slight performance edge. If you are an avid gamer pushing the device to its limits, you might  prefer the marginal stability of Android 15’s FPS. But keep in mind, Android 16 is likely to get updates that improve this, and the trade-off is you’d be missing out on new features in the meantime. Video Streaming and Playback We also tested streaming a high-quality video to see if either OS struggles with network or decoding for media. Both Android 15 and 16 achieved nearly 100% streaming efficiency in our test. This metric basically means the video played back smoothly without buffering or stuttering, maintaining ~99.8-99.9% optimal data throughput. Android 15 had an average of 99.9% stream consistency, and Android 16 was at 99.8%, with both never dropping below 99.7% during the playback. In short, no difference whatsoever. If you upgrade, your Netflix, YouTube, or Twitch streams will play just as flawlessly as before. Android 16 didn’t introduce any hiccups in how media is streamed or rendered. Both OS versions handle video streaming effortlessly on a decent connection, so you can enjoy your shows without worry about the update affecting it. Conclusion Think of Android 16 as a nice upgrade rather than a total makeover. Your phone will feel just as fast and your battery will last just as long as on Android 15, so you’re not losing anything. What you do  get are smarter notifications that keep you updated in real time, a fresher look with smoother animations, handy little perks like easier photo sharing and audio streaming, plus stronger security to keep your data safe. Unless you’re a hardcore gamer chasing every last frame per second, Android 16 is a no-brainer: it makes your phone feel a bit nicer, safer, and more useful without any downsides. Written By: Marcella Frattari  is the Digital Communications Manager at SmartViser, primarily responsible for ViserMark content creation and social media management. She holds a journalism background and is pursuing a master's degree in digital communications and marketing. Marcella brings a dynamic and creative approach to her work, consistently striving to enhance the company's online presence and engagement. Press Contact Marcella Frattari: Contact@visermark.com   Never miss out on our FREE Smartphone Reviews. Add  your email below to sign up for  our monthly newsletter ,   which provides all the latest mobile phones that ViserMark has tried  and tested. No pressure; you can unsubscribe anytime,  and we promise not to fill up your inbox.

SMARTPHONE TIER: MID TIER Battery Capacity mAh: 5000 Nothing CMF Phone 2 Pro: Nothing Beats a CMF Phone 2 Pro for Budget Efficiency SMARTPHONE BATTERY PERFORMANCE Based on Price: Mid Tier (€200-€499) Mid  Tier Ranking # 3 Learn more: Quick Summary ViserMark Labels Specifications Know the Test Results ViserMark Verdict Video Review - Soon Available The CMF Phone 2 Pro is a bold and refreshingly unique mid-range smartphone that blends striking design with practical performance, a large battery, and a surprisingly generous storage configuration. Positioned as Nothing’s budget-friendly alternative, this device makes a strong case for itself in a saturated segment by offering a clean software experience, playful aesthetics, and enough everyday reliability to satisfy users who prioritise value and simplicity over premium hardware. The handset immediately stands out thanks to its modular-inspired design. Although not truly modular in a traditional sense, the phone’s back panel can be swapped to accommodate various magnetic accessories, such as a wallet, kickstand, or lanyard, giving it a sense of personalisation not commonly found in this price range. The build quality feels solid, with a flat frame and textured rear that provides decent grip. It measures 8.1 millimetres in thickness and weighs 185 grams, which gives it a reassuring presence in hand without feeling cumbersome. The overall design embraces Nothing’s industrial DNA, complete with visible screws and bold colours like orange and blue, making it far more expressive than the average budget phone. The display is a 6.8-inch AMOLED panel with a Full HD+ resolution and a 120Hz refresh rate, offering smooth navigation and pleasing visual sharpness. Colours appear rich, blacks are deep, and content consumption is enjoyable for the most part. The screen peaks at around 1,200 nits of brightness, which is acceptable indoors and in shaded outdoor environments, though visibility suffers under direct sunlight. It’s a flat panel with slim bezels, and while it doesn’t push the limits of display technology, it delivers an enjoyable viewing experience that comfortably exceeds expectations for the price. Performance is handled by the MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Pro, built on a 4-nanometre process and paired with 8GB of RAM and 256GB of internal storage. This configuration provides responsive multitasking, smooth UI navigation, and reliable day-to-day usage. Apps load quickly, and switching between them is fluid. Light gaming is also possible, though graphically demanding titles will show the chipset’s limitations. The inclusion of 256GB of onboard storage is a standout feature at this price point, and the microSD slot offers welcome flexibility for users needing additional space. In everyday scenarios, the phone feels quick and consistent, which reflects well on both the chipset and the lightweight software. On the software front, the CMF Phone 2 Pro runs Nothing OS 3.2 on top of Android 15. The user interface is stripped back and highly cohesive, mirroring the minimalist ethos of Nothing’s mainline devices. There is very little bloatware, transitions are clean, and the experience is intuitive even for less tech-savvy users. The Essential Space, accessible via the physical Essential Key, introduces a small layer of AI functionality for quick reminders and voice memos. While the AI features feel more experimental than essential, the inclusion of a dedicated button for shortcuts is genuinely practical. Software support is also commendable, with three years of Android updates and four years of security patches promised. The camera system consists of a 50-megapixel main sensor, an ultrawide lens, and a macro sensor. In well-lit conditions, the main camera captures respectable photos with decent colour balance and acceptable dynamic range. Portraits are handled fairly well, particularly using the camera’s multi-level focal distance modes, which simulate optical zoom. However, results in low light are far less impressive, with visible noise, reduced detail, and a general lack of clarity. The ultrawide sensor also falls short, producing images that lack sharpness and contrast, even in daylight. As is often the case, the macro sensor adds little value. Video recording reaches up to 4K at 30fps, and stabilisation is passable, but nothing more. On the front, a 16-megapixel selfie camera delivers competent results under good lighting, though it struggles with edge detection in portrait mode and tends to soften details. One of the strongest elements of the CMF Phone 2 Pro is its battery life. With a 5,000mAh cell and efficient chipset, the phone consistently delivers excellent endurance. Charging is supported at 33 watts, delivering a 50% top-up in just over 30 minutes, according to the brand, although no charger is included in the box, which might disappoint some users. Audio performance is one of the phone’s weaker aspects. The mono speaker sounds metallic and lacks depth, particularly when playing music or video content. While it gets loud enough for calls or podcasts, the overall sound quality is underwhelming. Haptics, however, are surprisingly refined, with subtle vibration feedback that elevates the user experience. The fingerprint scanner is positioned on the side of the device and performs reliably, though its placement may be slightly awkward for users with larger hands. In terms of connectivity, the CMF Phone 2 Pro includes all the expected essentials, such as dual-band Wi-Fi, Bluetooth 5.3, USB-C, and 5G support. The hybrid SIM slot allows for either dual SIM usage or microSD expansion, adding a layer of flexibility. The phone focuses its strengths where they matter most: daily usability, storage, battery life, and overall smoothness. Ultimately, the CMF Phone 2 Pro succeeds by not overpromising. It doesn’t aim to challenge premium flagships, nor does it chase gimmicks. Instead, it focuses on offering a visually distinctive, well-performing, and affordable handset with a large battery and generous storage. While compromises exist, particularly in the audio and camera departments, they are balanced by its thoughtful software, efficient battery management, and the kind of design flair rarely seen at this price point. For users who want a practical, fun, and fuss-free smartphone experience with a bit of personality, the CMF Phone 2 Pro is a worthy contender. Pros Cons Eye-catching, customisable design with modular back accessories Mono speaker delivers flat, metallic audio Large 6.8-inch AMOLED display with 120Hz refresh rate Camera system underperforms in low light and with ultrawide shots 5,000mAh battery delivers excellent real-world endurance Always-On Display and Essential Key AI functions feel undercooked 256GB storage as standard, with microSD card support Screen visibility struggles under direct sunlight Smooth performance for daily tasks thanks to Dimensity 7300 Pro Charging limited to 33W (as per brand) and no charger included Clean, bloat-free software (Nothing OS 3.2 based on Android 15) No wireless charging, or stereo speakers Useful Essential Key for quick access to shortcuts and notes Some software features feel unfinished or inconsistently polished Promised 3 years of Android updates and 4 years of security patches Not suited for heavy social media or camera use Reliable side-mounted fingerprint scanner and refined haptics   ViserMark Labels for the Nothing CMF Phone 2 Pro Please take a look at the following information about the battery performance of the Nothing CMF Phone 2 Pro : Battery Life: The Nothing CMF Phone 2 Pro impresses with a battery life of up to 55 hours of active use, placing it firmly at the top of the mid-range segment in terms of endurance. This translates to approximately 2 full days of real-world usage for most users, even with moderate streaming, browsing, and social media activity. The 5000mAh battery, combined with the Dimensity 7300 Pro chipset and a clean software layer, delivers efficient power management across typical daily tasks. Whether you're navigating with GPS, watching long videos, or juggling multiple apps, the phone maintains consistent stamina without sudden drops. Battery Charging: According to the brand, the CMF Phone 2 Pro supports 33W wired charging, with a claimed 50% top-up in just over 30 minutes. In real-world use with a compatible USB PD charger, speeds are decent but not game-changing. A full charge typically takes around 1 hour and 50 minutes, making it adequate for overnight charging or quick top-ups before heading out. Battery Performance & Efficiency: The CMF Phone 2 Pro demonstrates excellent power management with an annual energy consumption of just 2.9 kWh, making it one of the more energy-efficient devices in its category. Its battery efficiency rating of 1.5 “leaves” is a very strong result, reflecting a well-optimised balance between performance and power draw. Thanks to this refined efficiency, the CMF Phone 2 Pro delivers dependable endurance without sacrificing fluidity or responsiveness, ideal for users who prioritise all-day use with minimal recharging needs. Specification Overview  - Released Date: April 2025 Body & Build: Dimensions: 164 x 78 x 7.8 mm Weight: 185g Materials: Plastic frame, Panda Glass front (Mohs level 5) with a removable back cover Durability: IP54-rated – protected from limited dust ingress and water splashes (up to 25cm depth for 20 minutes) Design: Lightweight and visually striking, available in bold colour options with a textured rear panel. The user-replaceable back is a rare and welcome feature in 2025, adding to its long-term practicality. Display: Size: 6.77-inch AMOLED Resolution: 2392 x 1080 (FHD+), ~388 ppi Refresh Rate: 120Hz (non-adaptive) Brightness: 3000 nits peak (measured 1255 nits in real-world use) HDR Support: HDR10+ and Ultra HDR certified Protection: Panda Glass (Mohs 5) Operating System: OS: Android 15 with Nothing OS 3.2 Software Support: Up to 3 major Android upgrades (brand policy) Chipset & Performance: Processor: MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Pro (4nm) CPU: Octa-core (4x Cortex-A78 @ 2.5GHz + 4x Cortex-A55 @ 2.0GHz) GPU: Mali-G615 MC2 Memory & Storage: Configurations: 128GB + 8GB RAM 256GB + 8GB RAM Expandable Storage: microSDXC slot (dedicated) Storage Technology: eMMC 5.1 (not UFS 3.x) Connectivity & Features: 5G: Supported (Sub-6 GHz) SIM: Dual Nano-SIM Wi-Fi: Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax), dual-band Bluetooth: 5.3 NFC: Market-dependent USB-C: Type-C Biometrics: Optical in-display fingerprint sensor Other Sensors: Accelerometer, gyroscope, proximity, compass Audio: Speakers: Single loudspeaker 3.5mm Jack: No Audio Quality: -27.0 LUFS Camera System: Rear Cameras: 50MP main (f/1.9, 1/1.57", 1.0µm, OIS, dual pixel PDAF) 50MP telephoto (f/1.9, 2x optical zoom) 8MP ultrawide (f/2.2, 120° FoV) Video Recording: Rear: 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps with gyro-EIS Front: 16MP, 1080p@30fps Colours Available: White, Black, Orange. Performance - HOW WE TEST ViserMark  offers a comprehensive range of battery performance test results based on different criteria and benchmarks for evaluating a smartphone's performance. Our tests are performed using the strictest protocol in a controlled environment to ensure repetition and consistency powered by SmartViser's test auto mation solution viSer . Translating technical specifications into consumer benefits with SmartViser VWS Analytics Studio  is a complementary product to the viSer Test Automation solution. It enhances the viSer user experience and is the fastest way to analyse and view smartphone test results. We have used the interactive dashboard to show you the recent test results and translated them into ViserMark Labels. Join our readers to receive the latest update to our smartphone battery performance scores and performance reviews as soon as we finish testing! Smartphone Battery Performance - FULL TEST RESULTS AND REVIEW ViserMark has put the Nothing CMF Phone 2 Pro through our testing protocol, based on real smartphone usage from 100% battery level down to power off. This includes daily activities, such as calls, web, video and music streaming, gaming, social networks, picture and video capture, and standby. All activities are executed in a defined order and timeline.   These test results, show how the Nothing CMF Phone 2 Pro performed and the scores achieved. 1. Battery Performance The CMF Phone 2 Pro  achieved a battery performance score of 50/100, positioning it well above the mid-tier average of 44.23, and outperforming both the Honor 200 Lite (46) and the Samsung Galaxy A26 (36). This result reflects not only solid battery life but also a well-calibrated balance between performance and power consumption, placing it among the better-optimised devices in its class. Charging is handled via 33W wired power delivery, with the brand claiming a 50% top-up in just over 30 minutes. However, no charger is included in the box, which may disappoint some buyers expecting a more complete out-of-the-box experience. There’s also support for 5W reverse wired charging, but no wireless charging. Overall, the CMF Phone 2 Pro stands out for its energy-to-performance efficiency. It’s a compelling option for users who value strong endurance and daily reliability without compromising on responsiveness or usability. 2. Battery Life In ViserMark’s battery life testing, the CMF Phone 2 Pro achieved 55 hours of active usage, translating to approximately 2 full days of typical real-world use. This result positions it at the top end of the mid-range bracket, slightly ahead of the Honor 200 Lite  (51 hours) and well above the Galaxy A26  (35 hours), confirming Nothing’s solid power management credentials. The strong result is a testament to the CMF Phone 2 Pro ’s effective synergy between its Dimensity 7300 Pro processor and the lightweight Nothing OS 3.2, which together ensure minimal background drain and smooth task handling. For users seeking reliable day-to-day endurance, the CMF Phone 2 Pro offers confident all-day use without anxiety over battery percentage. Its excellent battery life makes it an especially practical choice for those who value stamina without compromise. 3.   Battery Consumption The CMF Phone 2 Pro generally consumes more power than the Honor 200 Lite in categories such as social media, YouTube, downloads/uploads, and web browsing. These higher consumption levels suggest that the CMF model could be less finely tuned for sustained online activity and media streaming, especially in scenarios involving constant screen-on time or network usage. Interestingly, in gaming, the Honor 200 Lite draws more current than the CMF Phone 2 Pro , marking one of the few cases where the CMF device proves to be the more efficient option. This could be due to the way each phone handles GPU load and thermal management during graphically intensive sessions. Calls and media playback are nearly identical on both devices, indicating similarly optimised energy use during voice communication and offline video or music playback. Overall, while both phones perform competently in daily usage, the Honor 200 Lite maintains an edge in energy efficiency across most categories, with the exception of gaming. When comparing the Nothing CMF Phone 2 Pro with the Samsung Galaxy A26 in terms of battery consumption, the differences are notable across a range of everyday tasks. Both belong to the mid-tier segment, but their efficiency profiles reflect two distinct philosophies. The Galaxy A26 demonstrates considerably higher energy consumption in tasks such as social media, voice calls, downloads/uploads, and gaming. This suggests a less refined power management system, likely tied to the MediaTek Dimensity 6100+ chip and a software experience that prioritises responsiveness over longevity. The result: heavier battery drain during common usage, especially when multitasking or performing sustained activities. The CMF Phone 2 Pro consistently draws less current in these areas, offering a more efficient approach to power distribution. For users who frequently browse social media, play casual games, or make long calls, the CMF model is more likely to conserve energy and stay cooler over time. In video playback, media consumption, and web browsing, the CMF Phone 2 Pro also maintains a clear edge, consuming less battery across the board. These results suggest more aggressive background optimisation and possibly a more efficient display calibration. The only area where the A26 holds a slight advantage is camera usage, where its energy draw is marginally lower. However, this narrow win is not enough to shift the balance in its favour. In short, the Galaxy A26 may appeal to those seeking visual performance and speed, but the CMF Phone 2 Pro offers far better battery efficiency across nearly all real-world tasks,making it the more reliable choice for endurance-focused users. When comparing battery efficiency across the Nothing CMF Phone 2 Pro , Honor 200 Lite, Samsung Galaxy A26 and the Mid Tier average, one thing becomes clear: while all models deliver broadly similar battery life on paper, how they achieve those results varies significantly across real-world tasks. The Galaxy A26 draws the most power during active use, especially in social media, gaming, and call scenarios, burning through its 5,000mAh battery faster than rivals. Yet surprisingly, its overall endurance still holds up in testing, largely thanks to excellent idle management. This means the phone conserves energy well when on standby, apps are running in the background, or the screen is off, balancing out the high active consumption. The Honor 200 Lite stands out as the most consistent performer, showing efficient battery draw across nearly all workloads. It’s particularly well optimised for communication, download/upload and web browsing, a balance that makes it ideal for users who remain active on their devices throughout the day. Meanwhile, the CMF Phone 2 Pro proves remarkably energy-efficient in tasks like outgoing calls, media playback, and even gaming, where it draws noticeably less current than its main competitors. This makes it a strong option for users who spend a lot of time in these scenarios, as it balances solid performance with smart power use. To conclude, the Galaxy A26 compensates its heavy active usage with excellent standby efficiency. The Honor 200 Lite delivers the most balanced power management, especially during communication and browsing. Meanwhile, the CMF Phone 2 Pro stands out for its low consumption in high-demand tasks like gaming and media use, making it a practical choice for users who value endurance during everyday entertainment. 4.   Battery Efficiency In ViserMark’s battery efficiency evaluation, the Nothing CMF Phone 2 Pro achieved a solid 1.5-leaf rating, placing it at the top of its category alongside the Honor 200 Lite and well above the mid-tier average of 1.07 leaves. Its lean software, energy-conscious Dimensity 7300 Pro chipset, and practical hardware choices contribute to a usage profile that favours consistency and longevity. While it may not outperform flagship devices in raw specs, it stands out for delivering strong real-world battery behaviour in its price bracket. Unlike some rivals that rely on large batteries to compensate for poor optimisation, the CMF Phone 2 Pro delivers efficiency through smart power management. Combined with its balanced consumption across other workloads, the device manages to keep drain in check without compromising performance. 5.   Annual Energy Consumption According to ViserMark’s annual energy testing, the Nothing CMF Phone 2 Pro delivers an impressively low consumption of just 2.9 kWh per year, matching the highly efficient Honor 200 Lite and well below the mid-tier average of 3.63 kWh. This places it among the most power-conscious devices in its class. Such results highlight the CMF Phone 2 Pro ’s balanced engineering, combining practical hardware and a clean software experience to limit unnecessary drain across everyday use. Whether used actively or left in standby, the phone manages its power efficiently, making it a solid option for users prioritising energy-conscious tech. Its low annual energy footprint not only contributes to extended battery health but also translates into reduced long-term electricity costs, a meaningful benefit for environmentally and budget-aware consumers alike. Who Should Buy the Nothing CMF Phone 2 Pro ? The CMF Phone 2 Pro is a compelling choice for users who want standout design, clean software, and power efficiency, all wrapped in an affordable, feature-rich package. It’s especially suited for those who appreciate fluid day-to-day performance without needing flagship specs or gimmicks. With its eye-catching modular design, large AMOLED display, and smooth multitasking capabilities powered by the Dimensity 7300 Pro, this phone appeals to users looking for something a bit different, stylish, customisable, and practical. Its energy efficiency across gaming, calls and media playback also makes it ideal for users who engage in these tasks frequently and want longer-lasting performance throughout the day. Thanks to Nothing OS 3.2’s lightweight interface and extended update policy, the CMF Phone 2 Pro is a strong option for anyone seeking a clutter-free experience with long-term relevance. It’s particularly appealing for students, young professionals and casual users who want a phone that feels modern and reliable without breaking the bank. However, it may not fully satisfy photography enthusiasts or audiophiles, as its cameras and speaker system deliver mixed results. And while its modular back is a cool feature, the accessories may not be essential for everyone. In short, the CMF Phone 2 Pro is for users who value aesthetics, efficiency and a clean Android experience, those who want something functional, fun, and refreshingly different from the usual mid-range crowd. ViserMark VERDICT Using the Nothing CMF Phone 2 Pro is a refreshing experience that blends playful design with dependable day-to-day performance. For a budget-friendly device, it feels snappy and well-optimised, especially with 8GB of RAM handling tasks like web browsing, social media, messaging, and multitasking without breaking a sweat. The 6.7-inch AMOLED display is bright and fluid, with a smooth 120Hz refresh rate that elevates scrolling and swiping. The clean Nothing OS 3.2 interface enhances the experience, it’s lightweight, bloat-free, and simple to navigate, striking a nice balance between minimalism and functionality. Biometric unlocking is handled by an under-display fingerprint reader that’s accurate, though its low placement may feel awkward at first. Battery life is solid, comfortably lasting a full day of regular use, and the 33W fast charging gets you back up and running quickly, though again, there’s no charger in the box. Performance holds up well even under pressure. While it’s not built for hardcore gaming or professional multitasking, the Dimensity 7300 Pro chipset keeps things running smoothly for most users. The Essential Key and modular accessories add a layer of convenience and fun, though some features may still feel like work-in-progress. Overall, the CMF Phone 2 Pro delivers a lively, efficient and user-friendly experience. It’s a practical daily driver that doesn’t feel dull, combining smart design choices with enough power to keep pace with modern life. VCX (Valued Camera eXperience) The VCX Forum  has been working with its members on the system and infrastructure as a non-profit organisation. We strive to improve our technology to develop and exchange accurate and objective quality and performance indicators, which is our ultimate goal. We will also serve as a compass for the smartphone camera industry. We appreciate your interest in the VCX Forum. VCX Forum: No review Background Founded in October 2020 by Carl Pei, co‑founder of OnePlus, Nothing Technology Limited  (stylised as NOTHING ) is a   London ‑based consumer electronics company with a mission: to make technology “fun again” through distinctive design, transparent aesthetics, and clean software experiences. In August 2023, Nothing introduced the CMF by Nothing sub‑brand (CMF stands for Color, Material, Finish ) to broaden its accessible design-led product lineup. This brand is behind the CMF Phone 1, CMF Watch Pro, and eventually the CMF Phone 2 Pro, launched in April 2025 as an entry‑level smartphone with premium styling and long‑term software support. Written by Marcella Frattari   is the Communication Marketing and Lead Generation Manager at SmartViser, playing a key role in shaping the company's communication and marketing strategies. With a background in journalism and a passion for digital communication, Marcella focuses on improving SmartViser's overall online presence and engagement. Her dedication to clear, effective communication and creative content makes her a valuable asset to the team. Press Contact Marcella Frattari: Contact@visermark.com Our Resources ViserMark Scores ViserMark Reviews Success Stories Latest Articles Discover what ViserMark is all about. Read ViserMark's latest in-depth smartphone battery reviews. Discover our main success stories with Telecoms and other industries. Read more articles on our battery life, performance reviews, and test results. Know more Know more Know more Know more

SMARTPHONE TIER: MID TIER Battery Capacity mAh: 5000 Samsung Galaxy A26: Ideal for Basics, Less for Demanding Users SMARTPHONE BATTERY PERFORMANCE Based on Price: Mid Tier (€200-€499) Mid  Tier Ranking # 9 Learn more: Quick Summary ViserMark Labels Specifications Know the Test Results ViserMark Verdict Video Review - Soon Available The Samsung Galaxy A26 is a dependable and efficient mid-range smartphone that aims to strike the right balance between affordability, battery endurance, and a solid everyday experience. It stands out in its price category thanks to its combination of practical features, clean design, and Samsung’s strong software support, making it a suitable option for users who value stability and longevity over peak performance. Visually, the Galaxy A26 makes a strong impression with its 6.7-inch Super AMOLED display. The screen delivers a Full HD+ resolution of 1080 by 2340 pixels, with a sharp pixel density of approximately 385 ppi. The panel supports a 120Hz refresh rate, offering smooth scrolling and a pleasant visual fluidity in day-to-day interactions. Although brightness peaks at around 777 nits, which is acceptable but not outstanding, the AMOLED technology ensures deep contrast levels and vivid colour reproduction. The screen is protected by Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+, which offers added resistance to scratches and accidental knocks, placing it a step above the typical mid-tier standard. The A26 also features a surprisingly robust build for its class. It uses a glass front and back, both reinforced with Gorilla Glass Victus+, and a plastic frame. The phone is IP67 certified, meaning it is resistant to dust and can survive submersion in up to one metre of water for 30 minutes. Measuring 164 millimetres in height, 77.5 millimetres in width, and just 7.7 millimetres thick, the device feels slim and comfortable in the hand, despite its 200-gram weight. It is available in four colour options: Black, White, Mint, and Peach Pink, all of which follow Samsung’s recent trend of soft pastel tones. Under the hood, the Galaxy A26 is powered by two possible chipsets, depending on the market. The global variant includes the Exynos 1380, while the Latin American version features the Exynos 1280. Both are built on a 5-nanometre process, offering a balance of energy efficiency and decent processing power for general use. The CPU architecture includes Cortex-A78 and Cortex-A55 cores, suitable for running apps, browsing, streaming, and light multitasking. Graphics are handled by the Mali-G68 GPU, which performs well for casual gaming and video playback, though heavier 3D games will show the chipset's limitations. Memory configurations vary, starting at 4GB of RAM and ranging up to 8GB, paired with either 128GB or 256GB of internal storage. A microSDXC slot is available, though it uses the second SIM tray, so users will need to choose between dual-SIM functionality or expandable storage. In our testing, the 8GB RAM variant provided smooth navigation and held up well with multiple apps running in the background. Photography on the Galaxy A26 is driven by a triple camera setup. The main sensor is a 50-megapixel wide-angle lens with an f/1.8 aperture and optical image stabilisation, which helps produce stable images and reduces motion blur, particularly in low-light conditions. This is complemented by an 8-megapixel ultra-wide lens with a 120-degree field of view, and a 2-megapixel macro sensor. While the macro lens is more of a supporting element, the main and ultra-wide lenses perform adequately for casual photography. The phone also supports video recording at up to 4K resolution at 30 frames per second, with additional software stabilisation. On the front, a 13-megapixel camera captures well-lit selfies and is capable of recording 1080p video. Battery life is one of the Galaxy A26’s strongest assets. It houses a 5000mAh battery which, when combined with the efficiency of the Exynos chipset, delivers excellent real-world performance. Charging is supported at up to 25 watts via USB-C, which is reasonable for its price point, although no charger is included in the box. In terms of connectivity, the Galaxy A26 covers all essential bases. It supports 5G networks, Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac with dual-band capabilities, Bluetooth 5.3, and USB Type-C 2.0 with OTG support. GPS is reinforced with compatibility for Galileo, GLONASS, BDS, and QZSS systems. NFC is included in selected markets. The side-mounted fingerprint sensor is fast and reliable, and the phone retains a physical SIM tray that supports nano-SIMs. On the software side, the A26 runs Android 15 with Samsung’s One UI 7. It benefits from Samsung’s long-term software policy, which guarantees up to six major Android upgrades, keeping the device relevant for several years. The interface is clean and customisable, with useful features like Circle to Search and virtual proximity sensing enhancing the user experience. Overall, the Samsung Galaxy A26 brings together a thoughtful mix of modern hardware, excellent battery efficiency, and long-term software support. While it does not compete with flagship-level performance or imaging, it offers a polished and dependable experience that is ideal for users looking for a fuss-free daily driver with trusted build quality and Samsung’s ecosystem behind it. Pros Cons Vivid 6.7-inch Super AMOLED display with Full HD+ resolution and 120Hz refresh rate Performance can feel limited during gaming or intensive multitasking IP67-rated water and dust resistance Screen brightness is only average in direct sunlight Optical image stabilisation on the main 50MP camera Ultrawide and macro cameras offer basic results Up to 8GB RAM and microSDXC expansion Charging limited to 25W with no charger included Samsung’s long-term software support (up to 6 years) Plastic frame feels less premium than metal alternatives Gorilla Glass Victus+ protection on front and back Shared SIM tray limits dual SIM and storage expansion flexibility Dual SIM support and broad 5G compatibility No support for wireless charging or UFS 3.1+ storage speeds Clean, modern design with a solid in-hand feel Software occasionally shows stutters with heavy app loads Reliable side-mounted fingerprint sensor No power-saving features as advanced as those on higher-end Samsung models   ViserMark Labels for th e Samsung Galaxy A26 Please take a look at the following information about the battery performance of the Samsung Galaxy A26 : Battery Life: The Samsung Galaxy A26 delivers up to 35 hours of active use under balanced conditions, which translates to just over a day and a half for typical users. While not class-leading, it’s a respectable showing for a mid-tier device, especially given its 6.7-inch AMOLED screen and 5G connectivity. However, our real-world tests reveal that battery life can drop more rapidly when using mobile data, GPS navigation or the camera for extended periods. Streaming video and social media apps are also moderately power-hungry, so users who lean heavily on multimedia may need to recharge before the day ends. Battery Charging: The Galaxy A26 supports 25W wired charging, although no charger is included in the box. In our testing with a compatible USB PD 3.0 charger, a full charge took approximately 1 hour and 59 minutes, notably slower than Samsung's quoted figures and significantly behind many rivals in the same segment. There is no support for wireless charging, and the USB-C 2.0 port limits both data transfer speeds and charging flexibility. While the charging speed is tolerable for light users or overnight top-ups, it feels dated in 2025, especially when brands like Xiaomi and Motorola consistently offer 40W to 67W charging in devices at similar or lower price points. Battery Performance & Efficiency: Efficiency is where the Galaxy A26 reveals its mixed identity. In synthetic tests, its energy consumption ranks close to the Xperia 10 V, drawing more power per task than the Honor 200 Lite across nearly all usage scenarios, from social media to camera use. Web browsing and gaming, in particular, saw sharper battery drain compared to segment averages. Annual energy usage was calculated at 4.6 kWh, higher than ideal for a 5000mAh battery. While idle efficiency remains acceptable, its performance under load shows that Samsung’s software optimisations, while stable, fall short of competitors who have tuned their power draw more aggressively. Specification Overview  - Released Date: March 2025 Body & Build: Dimensions: 164 x 77.5 x 7.7 mm Weight: 200g Materials: Glass front and back (Gorilla Glass Victus+), plastic frame Durability: IP67-certified – water and dust resistant (up to 1m for 30 minutes) Design: Sturdy and symmetrical build with a minimalist aesthetic; slightly heavier than some mid-range competitors, but reassuring in hand Display: Size: 6.7-inch Super AMOLED Resolution: 2340 x 1080 (FHD+), ~385 ppi Refresh Rate: 120Hz (non-adaptive) Brightness: ~777 nits peak (measured) HDR Support: No HDR certification Protection: Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ Operating System: OS: Android 15 with One UI 7 Support: Up to 6 years of Android upgrades (Samsung policy as of 2025) Chipset & Performance: Global Variant: Processor: Exynos 1380 (5nm) CPU: Octa-core (4x Cortex-A78 @ 2.4GHz + 4x Cortex-A55 @ 2.0GHz) GPU: Mali-G68 MP5 LATAM Variant: Processor: Exynos 1280 (5nm) CPU: Octa-core (2x Cortex-A78 @ 2.4GHz + 6x Cortex-A55 @ 2.0GHz) GPU: Mali-G68 Memory & Storage: Configurations: 128GB + 4GB / 6GB / 8GB RAM 256GB + 6GB / 8GB RAM Expandable Storage: microSDXC (shared SIM slot) Storage Tech: UFS 2.2 (not UFS 4.0) Connectivity & Features: 5G: Supported (Sub-6 GHz) SIM: Dual Nano-SIM (no eSIM support) Wi-Fi: Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac), dual-band Bluetooth: 5.3 NFC: Available (market-dependent) USB-C: USB Type-C 2.0, OTG Biometrics: Side-mounted fingerprint reader Other Features: Circle to Search, virtual proximity sensor, compass, gyro, accelerometer Audio: Speakers: Single loudspeaker 3.5mm Jack: Not included Audio Quality: -27.1 LUFS Camera System: Rear Cameras: 50MP main (f/1.8, OIS, PDAF) 8MP ultrawide (f/2.2, 120˚ FoV) 2MP macro (f/2.4) Video: Up to 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, 720p@480fps (gyro-EIS) Front Camera: 13MP (f/2.2), 1080p@30fps video recording Colours Available: Black, White, & Mint. Performance - HOW WE TEST ViserMark  offers a comprehensive range of battery performance test results based on different criteria and benchmarks for evaluating a smartphone's performance. Our tests are performed using the strictest protocol in a controlled environment to ensure repetition and consistency powered by SmartViser's test auto mation solution viSer . Translating technical specifications into consumer benefits with SmartViser VWS Analytics Studio  is a complementary product to the viSer Test Automation solution. It enhances the viSer user experience and is the fastest way to analyse and view smartphone test results. We have used the interactive dashboard to show you the recent test results and translated them into ViserMark Labels. Join our readers to receive the latest update to our smartphone battery performance scores and performance reviews as soon as we finish testing! Smartphone Battery Performance - FULL TEST RESULTS AND REVIEW ViserMark has put the Samsung Galaxy A26 through our testing protocol, based on real smartphone usage from 100% battery level down to power off. This includes daily activities, such as calls, web, video and music streaming, gaming, social networks, picture and video capture, and standby. All activities are executed in a defined order and timeline.   These test results, show how the Samsung Galaxy A26 performed and the scores achieved. 1. Battery Performance The Samsung Galaxy A26 achieved a battery performance score of 36/100, positioning it below the mid-tier average of 43.95/100, and trailing both the Honor 200 Lite  (46) and the Sony Xperia 10 V 5G  (28). While it clearly outperforms the Xperia in overall stamina, it still falls short of matching the efficiency and endurance of the Honor device, which currently leads this trio. Charging is managed via 25W wired power delivery, but without a charger in the box. In real-world conditions, a full charge took 1 hour and 59 minutes using a certified USB PD charger, which is significantly slower than many direct competitors in the same price range. There is no support for wireless or reverse wireless charging. Overall, while the Galaxy A26 can handle most day-to-day operations, its energy-to-performance ratio is uncompetitive. High consumption rates across all categories raise questions about the efficiency of Samsung’s tuning on this model. Power users or even moderate multitaskers may find the experience underwhelming compared to better-optimised alternatives in the same segment. 2. Battery Life In ViserMark’s battery life testing, the Samsung Galaxy A26 reached 35 hours of active usage, which translates to around 1.5 days of typical real-world use. This result places it in line with many mid-tier smartphones, though it falls slightly behind top performers in this price range. Despite packing a relatively large 5,000mAh battery, the A26’s endurance does not fully reflect its capacity, likely due to less efficient power management from the MediaTek Dimensity 6100+ chip and software optimisation that lags behind rivals. In comparison, the Honor 200 Lite  delivered an impressive 51 hours, and even the Sony Xperia 10 V 5G , with a smaller battery, managed 33 hours, indicating better tuning and efficiency in those models. Still, the A26 provides sufficient day-to-day stamina for light to moderate users, particularly those who avoid intensive tasks like mobile gaming or frequent GPS use. Its strength lies in offering solid 5G performance and a clean UI, but power users or heavy streamers may find themselves needing to charge more often than expected for a phone with this battery size. 3.   Battery Consumption The Samsung Galaxy A26  and the Honor 200 Lite were analysed for battery consumption across various daily tasks using SmartViser's viSer and VWS Analytics Studio . The comparison highlighted differences in power usage for activities such as social media, calls, gaming, camera, and web browsing. In general, the Honor 200 Lite manages to deliver smoother and more balanced performance when it comes to energy consumption. During typical social media use and voice calls, the Galaxy A26 draws noticeably more power, suggesting that it isn’t as well-optimised for tasks requiring sustained connectivity or screen interaction. This is especially relevant for users who spend long periods browsing or using communication apps, as the A26 may run warmer and deplete the battery more quickly. When gaming, downloading content, or uploading files, the A26 again proves to be more power-hungry than its Honor counterpart. While it remains capable of handling these tasks, the higher energy draw could impact overall endurance in longer sessions or during multitasking. The only area where the Galaxy A26 holds a slight advantage is during camera use, where its power consumption is marginally better than that of the Honor 200 Lite . However, this alone isn’t enough to offset the broader efficiency gap between the two devices. In video playback, media consumption and web browsing, the A26 continues to consume more energy. For users who rely on their device throughout the day without frequent charging opportunities, this could become a noticeable drawback over time. In summary, while both phones offer a solid mid-range experience, the Honor 200 Lite is better tuned for day-to-day efficiency. It manages to stretch battery life more effectively across a wider range of tasks, giving it an edge for users focused on lasting performance. When comparing the Samsung Galaxy A26 with the Sony Xperia 10 V 5G in terms of battery consumption, the differences are notable across a range of everyday tasks. Both belong to the mid-tier segment, but their efficiency profiles reflect two distinct philosophies. The Galaxy A26 draws considerably more power during social media use, outgoing calls, and gaming. These are areas where screen-on time, connectivity, and system responsiveness come into play, suggesting that the A26 prioritises fluidity and visual performance at the expense of endurance. This is particularly evident during longer call sessions and continuous scrolling or engagement-heavy apps. In contrast, the Xperia 10 V 5G proves significantly more efficient in those same scenarios. Whether you're browsing social platforms, placing voice calls, or playing casual games, the Sony device maintains a lower battery drain, which can translate to longer uptime and fewer interruptions for charging. The A26 does manage to be slightly more efficient when using the camera, offering smoother capture sessions with less impact on battery life. However, in areas like YouTube streaming, media playback, and web browsing, the Xperia once again conserves energy more effectively, likely due to its lighter software and simpler visual output. Ultimately, the Galaxy A26 offers more visual punch and a snappier experience but at the cost of greater energy draw across most usage categories. Meanwhile, the  Xperia 10 V 5G   caters to users who prioritise longer sessions and efficient use, even if it comes with more modest hardware performance. When comparing battery efficiency across the Samsung Galaxy A26 , Honor 200 Lite , Sony Xperia 10 V 5G , and the Mid Tier average, one thing becomes clear: even if the overall performance scores are similar, the way each phone handles everyday tasks is quite different. That’s because these scores are not just about how much power is used during active use, but also how well the phone manages what’s happening in the background when not in use. Unlike its rivals, the Galaxy A26 performs surprisingly well when idle or in standby. It’s able to reduce power drain significantly when apps are open but inactive, or when the screen is off and the phone is on hold. This effective idle management helps compensate for the much higher battery usage during active tasks, pulling the overall battery score closer to its more efficient competitors. In contrast, both the Honor 200 Lite and Xperia 10 V 5G consume less power during individual tasks — they’re simply better tuned for low drain while interacting with apps. The Honor, in particular, is consistently efficient across all workloads, and the Xperia excels in communication and browsing, although it's a bit more demanding when using the camera. In short, the Galaxy A26 drains faster during actual use, but preserves energy well in between. That’s why, even though it burns through more power while you’re using it, it still ends up with a similar total battery score — especially for users with more passive or standby-heavy usage patterns. Still, those seeking better overall efficiency in day-to-day tasks might lean toward the Honor or Xperia instead. 4.   Battery Efficiency In ViserMark’s battery efficiency evaluation, the Samsung Galaxy A26 received a modest 0.5-leaf rating — the same as the Xperia 10 V 5G , and well below both the mid-tier average and the Honor 200 Lite , which leads this group with a 1.5-leaf score. This low efficiency score doesn’t stem from lack of battery capacity, as both the A26 and Xperia 10 V 5G carry 5,000mAh cells. Instead, it reflects how each phone manages its energy during day-to-day tasks. While the Galaxy A26 performs reasonably when idle, it consumes considerably more power during nearly every active use case, from social media to calls and gaming. This aggressive drain drags down its efficiency despite decent overall battery life. By contrast, the Honor 200 Lite strikes a much better balance. It uses less energy per task and demonstrates stronger background management, which translates into longer usage time and lower annual consumption. The Sony Xperia 10 V 5G , while also rated 0.5 leaves, shows slightly better control in communication and media tasks, though it still falls short of average expectations. In summary, the Galaxy A26 may offer solid endurance thanks to its standby performance, but when it comes to power efficiency in real use, it lags well behind the competition in its tier. 5.   Annual Energy Consumption According to ViserMark’s annual energy testing, the Samsung Galaxy A26 registers a consumption of 4.6 kWh per year, placing it well above both the mid-tier average (3.66 kWh) and the far more efficient Honor 200 Lite (2.9 kWh). Only the Sony Xperia 10 V 5G  fares worse, with a slightly higher figure of 4.9 kWh, the highest in this comparison. The  Honor 200 Lite  demonstrates a far more balanced approach, managing to keep power consumption low without sacrificing responsiveness. It uses nearly 40% less energy annually, which not only benefits battery longevity but also makes it the more sustainable and wallet-friendly option over time. While the Galaxy A26 may hold up in daily endurance thanks to its large 5,000mAh battery, its inefficient power management during real use limits its value for users seeking long-term energy savings. Who Should Buy the Samsung Galaxy A26? The Samsung Galaxy A26 is well-suited for users seeking a reliable, no-fuss smartphone that balances endurance, clean design and long-term support. It’s an ideal fit for those who prioritise battery longevity, simplicity and durability over bleeding-edge performance. With its large AMOLED screen, IP67 water resistance and Gorilla Glass Victus+ protection, it appeals to users who want solid hardware without overpaying. Its software longevity also makes it a smart choice for those who plan to hold onto their device for several years without worrying about outdated apps or features. Everyday users, especially those who focus on browsing, messaging, video streaming and light photography, will find the A26 dependable and familiar. Its efficiency during idle and standby makes it particularly appealing for people with passive use habits or those who don't constantly push their device. However, it’s less suitable for power users, gamers, or anyone who relies on demanding apps, frequent multitasking or extended sessions on mobile data and GPS. The A26’s energy consumption spikes under pressure, and its 25W charging—without a bundled adapter—can feel sluggish by 2025 standards. The Galaxy A26 is ultimately for users who value stability, battery life and Samsung’s trusted ecosystem in a mid-range package that gets the job done, quietly, reliably, and without unnecessary frills. ViserMark VERDICT The Samsung Galaxy   A26 - what's it like to use? Using the Galaxy A26 is a reminder that a mid-range phone can still feel smooth, sturdy, and thoughtfully built, so long as your expectations are realistic. Daily tasks like browsing, messaging, video streaming and social media run without hiccups, especially on the 8GB RAM variant. One UI 7 is clean and familiar, offering just enough customisation and smart features without overwhelming the user. The 6.7-inch Super AMOLED display adds a premium touch with vibrant colours and a 120Hz refresh rate, though its brightness can feel lacking under strong sunlight. The side-mounted fingerprint sensor is quick and reliable, and the phone’s IP67 rating adds peace of mind for everyday use. That said, the A26 starts to show its limits when pushed. Heavy multitasking, 3D gaming or frequent GPS use can cause occasional stutters and faster battery drain. Charging is also on the slower side at 25W, with no charger in the box, which may test the patience of more demanding users. Still, for light to moderate use, the Galaxy A26 feels dependable and efficient. It’s a practical daily companion wrapped in a sleek design, with long-term software support and solid hardware fundamentals that make it easy to live with. VCX (Valued Camera eXperience) The VCX Forum  has been working with its members on the system and infrastructure as a non-profit organisation. We strive to improve our technology to develop and exchange accurate and objective quality and performance indicators, which is our ultimate goal. We will also serve as a compass for the smartphone camera industry. We appreciate your interest in the VCX Forum. VCX Forum: No review Background The Samsung Group  is a South Korean multinational conglomerate headquartered in Samsung Town, Seoul. It comprises numerous affiliated businesses, most united under the Samsung brand. Samsung Electronics has assembly plants and sales networks in 74 countries and employs around 290,000 people. Samsung is a major manufacturer of electronic components such as lithium-ion batteries, semiconductors, image sensors, camera modules and displays for clients such as Apple, Sony, HTC and Nokia. Written by Marcella Frattari   is the Communication Marketing and Lead Generation Manager at SmartViser, playing a key role in shaping the company's communication and marketing strategies. With a background in journalism and a passion for digital communication, Marcella focuses on improving SmartViser's overall online presence and engagement. Her dedication to clear, effective communication and creative content makes her a valuable asset to the team. Press Contact Marcella Frattari: Contact@visermark.com Our Resources ViserMark Scores ViserMark Reviews Success Stories Latest Articles Discover what ViserMark is all about. Read ViserMark's latest in-depth smartphone battery reviews. Discover our main success stories with Telecoms and other industries. Read more articles on our battery life, performance reviews, and test results. Know more Know more Know more Know more

SMARTPHONE TIER: ENTRY TIER Battery Capacity mAh: 5160 Xiaomi Redmi 14C: Smart Budget, Solid Basics SMARTPHONE BATTERY PERFORMANCE Based on Price: Entry Tier (€0-€199) Entry  Tier Ranking # 8 Learn more: Quick Summary ViserMark Labels Specifications Know the Test Results ViserMark Verdict Video Review - Soon Available Quick Summary The Xiaomi Redmi 14C is an affordable smartphone that punches above its weight, delivering a smooth 120Hz display, dependable battery life, and a premium-feel design at a fraction of the price. While it doesn’t aim for high-end power or advanced camera systems, it provides a surprisingly well-rounded user experience for those seeking value and reliability. The 6.88-inch Dot Drop IPS LCD screen stretches nearly edge to edge, offering vibrant colours and ample brightness for everyday use. With an HD+ resolution of 1640×720 and a 120Hz refresh rate, the display is impressively fluid for a phone in this price bracket, ideal for casual browsing, video streaming, and social media. TÜV Rheinland certifications for low blue light and flicker-free dimming make it a comfortable choice for prolonged use. Though sharpness doesn’t match Full HD panels, the smoothness of the refresh rate makes up for it. Under the bonnet is the MediaTek Helio G81 Ultra, an octa-core chipset designed for essential daily tasks. The two Cortex-A75 performance cores and six Cortex-A55 efficiency cores run at up to 2.0 GHz, supported by a Mali-G52 MC2 GPU for basic gaming and video. It’s not built for heavy multitasking or demanding 3D titles, but performs adequately in real-world usage such as messaging, light gaming, and media playback. Memory configurations range from 4GB to 8GB of LPDDR4X RAM, with up to 256GB of expandable eMMC 5.1 storage, ensuring plenty of space for apps, media and documents. The 50MP main rear camera captures bright, detailed photos in daylight, with HDR and portrait modes adding versatility. The secondary lens is more decorative than functional, primarily aiding depth perception. The 13MP front camera is a welcome upgrade in this category, producing decent selfies with built-in beautification and a soft light ring for better low-light results. Video capture is limited to 1080p at 30fps on both cameras – sufficient for everyday social content. Despite its large 5,160mAh battery, the Redmi 14C falls short of expectations in real-world usage. In our testing, it delivered up to 39 hours of moderate use — slightly below average for entry-level smartphones. This makes battery life one of its more underwhelming aspects. On the upside, it supports 18W fast charging via USB-C, though no charger is included in the box. Using a compatible adapter, a full charge from 20 to 100% takes just over two hours. Design-wise, the Redmi 14C stands out from the crowd. It features a sturdy plastic frame, a flat-edged profile, and a stylish circular camera housing reminiscent of flagship models. Depending on the colour, the back panel may be made of either textured polycarbonate or glass-like material, offering a touch of elegance rarely seen at this price. Colour options include Midnight Black, Starry Blue, Sage Green, and Dreamy Purple, all adding personality without sacrificing durability. Out of the box, the Redmi 14C runs on Xiaomi’s HyperOS, based on Android 14. The interface is clean and responsive, offering features such as Reading Mode, Game Turbo, and memory extension (up to 16GB virtual RAM). Xiaomi promises two years of major Android updates and four years of security patches, which is generous for a budget phone. In terms of connectivity, the Redmi 14C supports dual SIM 4G LTE, Wi-Fi 5, Bluetooth 5.4, NFC (varies by market), and even FM radio via the 3.5mm headphone jack. There’s also a side-mounted fingerprint scanner and AI face unlock for quick and secure access. Pros Cons 120Hz refresh rate – Rare in this price range, provides smoother scrolling and UI animations Only HD+ resolution – 720p on a large screen results in less sharpness Large 6.88" display – Great for video watching and web browsing Basic performance – MediaTek Helio G81 Ultra is modest and not suitable for heavy apps or multitasking Long battery life – 5,160 mAh easily lasts over a full day of moderate use Slow storage – eMMC 5.1 is outdated compared to UFS storage Expandable storage – microSD slot supports up to 1TB Limited low-light camera performance – Night shots can be noisy and lack detail Modern software – Ships with Android 14 and Xiaomi’s new HyperOS No water or dust resistance rating – Use with care in wet conditions Fingerprint sensor and AI face unlock – Fast and convenient security features Mono speaker – Lacks stereo sound, audio is thin and unrefined Lightweight, modern design – Looks more premium than its price suggests Heavier than some rivals – Up to 211g depending on colour Headphone jack + FM radio – Still useful for many users Ads and bloatware – HyperOS includes pre-installed apps and some promotional content Dual SIM + dedicated microSD slot – No need to sacrifice a SIM for more storage Good value for money – Low price with solid specs for everyday tasks   ViserMark Labels for the Xiaomi Redmi 14C Please take a look at the following information about the battery performance of the Xiaomi Redmi 14C : Battery Life: The Xiaomi Redmi 14C delivers 39 hours of total usage, equating to just over 1.5 days under light to moderate use. While this may seem reasonable on paper, it's below average for the entry-tier segment, where several competitors exceed the 50-hour mark. Users expecting multi-day endurance may find themselves reaching for the charger more often than anticipated. Battery Charging: Xiaomi advertises 18W fast charging for the Redmi 14C, though no charger is included in the box. In our real-world tests, the device charged from 0% to 100% in 2 hours and 14 minutes using a compatible adapter. This puts it behind some budget rivals, especially those offering higher-wattage chargers out of the box. Battery Performance & Efficiency: In battery performance scoring, the Redmi 14C receives 38/100, reflecting basic efficiency but limited endurance under consistent use. The phone’s annual energy consumption is estimated at 4.3 kWh, keeping it within an acceptable range for low-end 4G devices, though it lacks the energy optimisation seen in more power-efficient competitors. Specification Overview  - Released Date: September 2024 Body & Build: Dimensions: 171.88 x 77.8 x 8.22 mm Weight: 204g (Midnight Black, Starry Blue), 207g (Sage Green) Materials: Plastic frame with a glossy or textured glass-like rear finish (varies by colour) Durability: No official IP rating for water or dust resistance Design: Concentric pattern on select colourways enhances grip and aesthetic appeal Display: Type: 6.88-inch Dot Drop IPS LCD Resolution: 1640 x 720 pixels (HD+), 260 ppi Refresh Rate: Up to 120Hz for smooth system navigation and UI animations Touch Sampling Rate: Up to 240Hz for improved responsiveness Brightness: 450 nits (typical), 600 nits (High Brightness Mode) Contrast Ratio: 1500:1 Colour Depth: 8-bit, 16.7 million colours Colour Gamut: 70% NTSC Eye Comfort & Certifications: TÜV Rheinland Low Blue Light (software solution) TÜV Rheinland Flicker Free DC Dimming Reading Mode Screen-to-Body Ratio: 89.7% Operating System: Software: Xiaomi HyperOS (based on Android 14) Software Support: Up to 2 major Android updates and 3 years of security patches Chipset & Performance: Processor: MediaTek Helio G81-Ultra (12nm) CPU: Octa-core (2x Cortex-A75 @ 2.0GHz + 6x Cortex-A55 @ 1.8GHz) GPU: Mali-G52 MC2 Memory & Storage: RAM Options: 4GB / 6GB / 8GB LPDDR4X Internal Storage: 128GB / 256GB eMMC 5.1 Expandable Storage: Yes, via microSD card (up to 1TB) Memory Extension: Virtual RAM expansion up to 16GB (on 8GB RAM model) Connectivity & Features: Speaker:  Mono bottom-firing Audio Jack:  3.5mm headphone jack Bluetooth:  5.4 (supports AAC / SBC / LDAC) Wi-Fi:  Dual-band Wi-Fi 5 (2.4GHz / 5GHz) NFC:  Yes (market dependent) FM Radio:  Yes (requires wired headphones) USB:  USB Type-C Capacity:  5,160mAh (typical) Charging:  18W fast charging supported (USB-C) Charger in Box:  No adapter included; recommended to use a PD-supported 18W charger Battery Life (tested):  Up to 39 hours of mixed use Charging Time (tested):  ~2 hours from 20% to 100% Navigation:  GPS, Glonass, Galileo, Beidou Camera System: Rear Cameras: Primary: 50MP wide, f/1.8 aperture, 5P lens Secondary: Auxiliary sensor for depth effects Features: HDR, Night Mode, Portrait Mode, 50MP high-res mode, Time-lapse Video Recording: 1080p @ 30fps 720p @ 30fps Front Camera: Resolution: 13MP, f/2.0 Features: Soft-light ring, HDR, Night Mode, Portrait Mode, Time-lapse Video Recording: 1080p @ 30fps 720p @ 30fps Colours Available: Midnight Black, Starry Blue, and Sage Green Performance - HOW WE TEST ViserMark  offers a comprehensive range of battery performance test results based on different criteria and benchmarks for evaluating a smartphone's performance. Our tests are performed using the strictest protocol in a controlled environment to ensure repetition and consistency powered by SmartViser's test auto mation solution viSer . Translating technical specifications into consumer benefits with SmartViser VWS Analytics Studio  is a complementary product to the viSer Test Automation solution. It enhances the viSer user experience and is the fastest way to analyse and view smartphone test results. We have used the interactive dashboard to show you the recent test results and translated them into ViserMark Labels. Join our readers to receive the latest update to our smartphone battery performance scores and performance reviews as soon as we finish testing! Smartphone Battery Performance - FULL TEST RESULTS AND REVIEW ViserMark has put the Xiaomi Redmi 14C through our testing protocol, based on real smartphone usage from 100% battery level down to power off. This includes daily activities, such as calls, web, video and music streaming, gaming, social networks, picture and video capture, and standby. All activities are executed in a defined order and timeline.   These test results, show how the Xiaomi Redmi 14C  performed and the scores achieved. 1. Battery Performance In ViserMark’s independent testing, the Xiaomi Redmi 14C  received a battery performance score of 38/100, placing it below the entry-tier average (43.5/100) and behind competitors like the Redmi 13C (52/100) and Motorola Moto G34 (43/100). This reflects limited battery efficiency, particularly under consistent usage. Despite housing a 5,160mAh battery, the Redmi 14C achieves around 39 hours of active usage, which, while serviceable, is lower than many devices in the same segment. Real-world endurance may cover a full day of moderate use, but power users may find themselves recharging more frequently than expected. This combination of moderate endurance and below-average battery optimisation makes the Redmi 14C a reasonable choice for basic users. However, those prioritising long-lasting performance may find more efficient alternatives within the same price bracket. 2. Battery Life The Xiaomi Redmi 14C  delivered 39 hours of continuous usage, equating to just over 1.5 days of moderate real-world use. While this allows the device to comfortably get through a full day, it underperforms compared to other entry-level competitors, particularly its predecessor, the Redmi 13C . Despite housing a slightly larger 5,160mAh battery than the Redmi 13C (5,000mAh), the 14C falls behind in endurance. This is largely due to limited power optimisation and the less efficient MediaTek Helio G81-Ultra chipset, which fails to fully capitalise on the increased capacity. The Xiaomi Redmi 14C provides a basic battery experience, suitable for casual users and light app usage. However, for those prioritising long-lasting standby or heavy multitasking, more efficient alternatives are available within the same price segment. 3.   Battery Consumption According to SmartViser’s viSer and VWS Analytics Studio , the Xiaomi Redmi 14C  generally consumes more power than the Motorola Moto G34 across most everyday tasks. The Redmi 14C shows notably higher current consumption during social media, gaming, YouTube, email, media playback, and web browsing, which contributes to its lower battery efficiency overall. However, the Motorola Moto G34 draws more power during camera usage, making it slightly less efficient in photography-related tasks. This could be due to differences in image processing or sensor behaviour between the two devices. In most use cases—especially in social media, outgoing call and gaming—the Redmi 14C shows less control over energy use, consuming well over 600mA in several categories. This aligns with its lower ViserMark battery score (38/100) and its relatively high annual energy consumption of 4.3 kWh, both indicating sub-par optimisation in comparison to its competitors. If camera use is a key priority, the Redmi 14C might offer a slight advantage in energy draw. However, for users seeking a more balanced and efficient performance across all tasks, the Moto G34  remains the stronger choice in the entry-tier market. The battery performance comparison between the Xiaomi Redmi 14C  and Redmi 13C  highlights notable differences in power consumption across a variety of everyday tasks, giving a clear picture of where the newer model may lag in efficiency. From social media browsing, outgoing calls, and gaming, to YouTube streaming, downloads/uploads, camera usage, and web browsing, the Redmi 14C registers noticeably higher current draw in every category. This uniform increase in consumption may stem from enhancements in system features, such as the smoother 120Hz refresh rate, more demanding HyperOS software, and upgraded internal components. While these upgrades contribute to a better user experience in terms of display fluidity and interface responsiveness, they also lead to reduced battery efficiency when compared directly with the Redmi 13C . Despite having a similarly sized battery, the Redmi 13C proves more power-efficient, managing background tasks and foreground usage with less energy consumption across the board. The Xiaomi Redmi 14C  demonstrates consistently higher power consumption across all tested activities when compared to the Redmi 13C , Motorola Moto G34 , and the Entry Tier average. This broad analysis highlights key differences in battery performance depending on the task, offering a clearer picture of the device’s energy profile. Here's an overview of the findings: Social Media & Communication: The Redmi 14C  consumes significantly more power than all other devices when browsing social media and making outgoing calls. This places it as the least efficient device in communication-heavy use, with the Redmi 13C  and Motorola Moto G34  outperforming it substantially. Gaming & Multimedia: In gaming, the Redmi 14C  shows the highest current draw, likely due to its 120Hz refresh rate and less efficient processing. For YouTube playback and media consumption, the Redmi 14C again trails the competition, drawing more current than the average entry-tier device. Productivity & Web Browsing: The Redmi 14C records higher consumption during email and web browsing, showing less optimisation in typical productivity scenarios. The Redmi 13C and Moto G34  remain more efficient in these use cases, with the Entry Tier average being better than the 14C. Camera & Media Playback: Camera usage also reveals increased power drain, although the Moto G34 surpasses it in energy use here, making it the only task where the Redmi 14C isn’t the most power-hungry. 4.   Battery Efficiency In ViserMark’s battery efficiency testing, the Xiaomi Redmi 14C  received a 0.5-leaf rating, placing it significantly below the entry-tier average of 1.28 leaves. This result highlights the device’s limited power optimisation, especially when compared to similarly priced alternatives like the Redmi 13C  and Motorola Moto G34 , both of which scored 1.5 leaves. Despite its large 5,160mAh battery, the Redmi 14C fails to make efficient use of its capacity. The MediaTek Helio G81-Ultra chipset, while functional for basic tasks, contributes to higher power drain, especially during multitasking and extended screen-on time. While the Redmi 14C may offer acceptable endurance for casual users, its below-average efficiency means that power users or heavy streamers may find themselves reaching for a charger sooner than expected. For users prioritising battery longevity and energy-conscious design, more optimised entry-level phones are available within the same price segment. 5.   Annual Energy Consumption The Xiaomi Redmi 14C  has an estimated annual energy consumption of 4.3 kWh, making it one of the least efficient devices in its class in terms of power usage. This figure is significantly higher than the entry-tier average of 3.33 kWh, and well above both the Redmi 13C (2.9 kWh) and Motorola Moto G34 (3.1 kWh). The high energy draw reflects the Redmi 14C ’s limited battery optimisation, with its MediaTek Helio G81-Ultra chipset and basic power management strategy contributing to its increased power demands. Users can expect shorter runtimes compared to other budget phones, especially under moderate to heavy daily usage. While not necessarily a deal-breaker at this price point, the Redmi 14C ’s energy efficiency lags behind direct competitors, suggesting that Xiaomi has prioritised affordability and display features over extended battery longevity or green performance. Who Should Buy the Xiaomi Redmi 14C? Introducing the Xiaomi Redmi 14C , perfect for various user profiles: Everyday Users on a Budget: If you're looking for a smartphone that covers all the essentials without breaking the bank, the Redmi 14C delivers great value. With a low price and options for up to 8GB RAM with memory extension, it handles tasks like WhatsApp, web browsing, and YouTube comfortably. It’s a smart pick for students, first-time smartphone users, or anyone needing a reliable secondary phone. Media Consumers Who Want a Big Display: Thanks to its 6.88-inch LCD display with a 120Hz refresh rate, the Redmi 14C is well-suited for watching videos, scrolling social media, or reading articles. While it only offers HD+ resolution, the large screen and TÜV-certified eye comfort features provide a pleasant experience during long viewing sessions. If you want a big screen at a low price, this is it. Users Who Prioritise Storage Flexibility: The Redmi 14C supports expandable storage up to 1TB via microSD, making it ideal for those who like to keep lots of photos, videos, or offline media. Whether you choose the 128GB or 256GB variant, the extra slot is a huge bonus, especially for users who often run out of space on entry-level phones. ViserMark VERDICT The Xiaomi Redmi 14C - what's it like to use? The Xiaomi Redmi 14C  is an entry-level smartphone that focuses on delivering a balanced experience for everyday users. It doesn’t aim to impress with high-end specs but rather with dependable performance, a large display, and a practical feature set at an affordable price. Powered by the MediaTek Helio G81 Ultra and up to 8GB of RAM (with memory extension), it handles basic tasks like social media, messaging, video streaming, and casual gaming without much trouble. Paired with eMMC 5.1 storage, app opening speeds are decent but not particularly fast — something to keep in mind for multitaskers. The 6.88-inch Dot Drop LCD display is one of the standout features of the device. It supports a 120Hz refresh rate and a 240Hz touch sampling rate, which contribute to a smoother scrolling and navigation experience. While the resolution is only HD+ (1640 x 720), it’s still fine for casual viewing, especially at this price point. The peak brightness of 600 nits (HBM) is adequate indoors and usable outdoors in most conditions, though direct sunlight may pose challenges. Eye comfort features like TÜV Rheinland Low Blue Light certification and Reading Mode enhance long-term usability. In terms of design, the Redmi 14C manages to look more premium than expected. Its glass-like back panel and textured finish (depending on the colour variant) give it a clean and stylish look. However, it's on the heavier side at over 200g, which is noticeable during extended use. The phone lacks an official IP rating, so it's not built for rough environments — though the plastic frame provides a decent grip and drop resistance. The phone’s 50MP rear camera is capable of delivering decent photos in good lighting, with vibrant colours and acceptable dynamic range. The 13MP selfie camera performs well for video calls and basic selfies. However, both cameras struggle in low light, and there’s no image stabilisation, so photo and video clarity can drop significantly in challenging conditions. With a 5,160mAh battery, the Redmi 14C is built to last through the day — but in real-world usage, it lasts around 39 hours, slightly below the entry-tier average. It supports 18W fast charging, but does not ship with a charger, so you’ll need to use a compatible USB-C adapter. Charging from 20% to full takes just over two hours, which is standard for this segment. On the software side, the device runs Xiaomi’s new HyperOS based on Android 14, offering an updated UI and features like Reading Mode, Game Turbo, and customisation options. However, bloatware and ads are still present out of the box. Fortunately, many pre-installed apps can be uninstalled, and recommendations can be disabled in settings. The Redmi 14C includes a side-mounted fingerprint sensor, 3.5mm headphone jack, FM radio, Bluetooth 5.4, NFC (in select markets), and dual SIM with microSD support — making it a feature-rich phone for the price. Overall, the Redmi 14C  doesn’t promise a flagship experience — and it doesn’t need to. It delivers a large screen, solid battery life, and a reliable performance for the basics. It’s not the fastest or most efficient device, but it gets the job done for users who want a practical phone without unnecessary extras. If you're on a budget, need a phone for daily tasks, and appreciate a large display, the Redmi 14C  is a dependable everyday companion. Just don’t expect miracles when it comes to gaming, photography, or long-term software longevity. VCX (Valued Camera eXperience) The VCX Forum  has been working with its members on the system and infrastructure as a non-profit organisation. We strive to improve our technology to develop and exchange accurate and objective quality and performance indicators, which is our ultimate goal. We will also serve as a compass for the smartphone camera industry. We appreciate your interest in the VCX Forum. No VCX reviews are available for this smartphone.   Background Xiaomi  was founded in 2010 by serial entrepreneur Lei Jun, with a vision to deliver high-quality technology at accessible prices. Committed to a user-centric approach, Xiaomi quickly gained traction in the mobile internet space. By 2014, the company had sold over 61 million smartphones and expanded into key markets including Taiwan, Hong Kong, Singapore, Malaysia, the Philippines, India, Indonesia, and Brazil. Headquartered in Beijing, China, Xiaomi continues its global expansion with offices across the Asia-Pacific region, India, and Brazil, positioning itself as a rising global tech brand. Written by Marcella Frattari   is the Communication Marketing and Lead Generation Manager at SmartViser, playing a key role in shaping the company's communication and marketing strategies. With a background in journalism and a passion for digital communication, Marcella focuses on improving SmartViser's overall online presence and engagement. Her dedication to clear, effective communication and creative content makes her a valuable asset to the team. Press Contact Marcella Frattari: Contact@visermark.com Our Resources ViserMark Scores ViserMark Reviews Success Stories Latest Articles Discover what ViserMark is all about. Read ViserMark's latest in-depth smartphone battery reviews. Discover our main success stories with Telecoms and other industries. Read more articles on our battery life, performance reviews, and test results. Know more Know more Know more Know more

SMARTPHONE TIER: FLAGSHIP/PRO TIER Battery Capacity mAh: 3900 Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge: Who Said Slim Phones Can’t Keep Up? SMARTPHONE BATTERY PERFORMANCE Based on Price: Flagship/Pro Tier (€700+)  Flagship/Pro  Tier Ranking # 13 Learn more: Quick Summary ViserMark Labels Specifications Know the Test Results ViserMark Verdict Video Review - Soon Available The Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge is a stunning declaration in slim smartphone design, the epitome of a flagship experience – in order to maintain the exclusivity of the earlier statement behind a more physically expensive body. Featuring a sophisticated titanium frame, clear 6.7-inch AMOLED screen and flagship-level performance, the S25 Edge is targeting users who are looking for a unique design without compromise at the very top-end of its spec sheet, with some compromise elsewhere. At the heart is the Snapdragon 8 Elite, Qualcomm’s 3nm monster chip which is all about grunt with a dual-cluster CPU — there are two insanely fast Oryon V2 Phoenix L cores clocked at 4.47GHz and six Phoenix M cores at 3.53GHz to help get you through life at a rapid pace. Powered by an Adreno 830 GPU, as much as 12GB of RAM, and up to 512GB of UFS 4.0 storage, the S25 Edge is more than up to the task for everyday multitasking and even the highest demanding mobile games. The benchmark scores are good and while there is some thermal throttling if you consistently push it for a long duration, naturally, the ultra-thin design too, but in daily use, the performance is very good. The 6.7-inch LTPO AMOLED 2X screen is both sharp and smooth, at a resolution of 1440x3120 with a 120Hz adaptive refresh rate, and HDR10+ support. Gorilla Glass Ceramic 2 provides even more protection with a measured peak brightness of 1416 nits to help you see in the bright sun. It’s not the brightest panel out there, but it gets plenty bright for media consumption, and it has deep blacks and rich colours that make everything from scrolling to swiping feel that much more premium. The S25 Edge’s design is definitely the area where it shines. Slimmer than ever – at 5.8mm thin it’s the firm’s slimmest ever Galaxy S flagship – but still solid and resilient, at 163g with IP68-certified water and dust resistance. The titanium frame feels great in the hand, and the uncluttered rear housing bares an increasingly rear-facing world that is future-facing and free of branding. Available in Titanium Icyblue, Titanium Silver and Titanium Jetblack, it’s a device that makes you take a second look without trying too hard. Photography is led by a 200MP main camera, delivering detailed images in good lighting with decent dynamic range. Accompanied by a 12MP ultrawide, the setup lacks a dedicated telephoto lens, one of the phone’s few drawbacks. Still, the 2x sensor crop offers solid short-range zoom. Video recording capabilities are robust, supporting 8K at 30fps and multiple slow-motion modes. The 12MP front-facing camera provides clean selfies and sharp 4K video, ideal for casual creators and video calls alike. Battery life, however, is where the S25 Edge shows its slim-profile trade-offs. The 3900mAh cell performs adequately in moderate use but may struggle to go the full day under heavy loads, especially when using mobile data or GPS. It supports 25W wired charging (55% in 30 minutes) and 15W wireless charging (Qi2 Ready), though rivals now offer faster speeds and larger capacities. While fine for the minimalist, power users may need a midday top-up or external battery. The S25 Edge runs Android 15 with One UI 7, bringing Samsung’s latest AI features like Circle to Search, AI Select, and Generative Edit, along with seven years of OS and security updates. Software performance is smooth, and the addition of Samsung DeX and Ultra-Wideband (UWB) elevates productivity for those who like to do more with their phone. With Wi-Fi 7, Bluetooth 5.4, stereo speakers, and an ultrasonic in-display fingerprint reader, the Galaxy S25 Edge covers all the premium essentials. It's a stunning choice for those who crave a lighter, sleeker handset, as long as they’re aware of the battery life compromise that comes with all that finesse. Pros Cons At just 5.8 mm thick, the Galaxy S25 Edge is Samsung’s slimmest flagship to date. The titanium frame, combined with Gorilla Glass Ceramic 2 on the front and Victus 2 on the back, makes it both stylish and surprisingly robust. Despite its large screen, the handset feels incredibly light and ergonomic in the hand. The 3900mAh battery is a notable compromise. While software optimisation helps, real-world endurance struggles to match competitors, particularly during heavy use or emergencies without access to a charger. The 6.7-inch LTPO AMOLED 2X display offers QHD+ resolution (1440 x 3120), a 120Hz adaptive refresh rate, HDR10+ support, and up to 1416 nits peak brightness. Samsung’s new anti-reflective coating significantly enhances visibility outdoors. Unlike the standard S25, the Edge lacks a dedicated telephoto camera. Users relying on optical zoom will miss the flexibility offered by a 3x or 5x zoom lens. Powered by the Snapdragon 8 Elite chip and backed by 12GB LPDDR5X RAM and UFS 4.0 storage, the S25 Edge handles multitasking, gaming and creative workloads with ease. Benchmark scores are among the highest in its class. As with other modern flagships, there’s no microSD slot. Users must choose between 256GB or 512GB at purchase — which may be limiting for those with large media libraries. Running One UI 7 on Android 15, the S25 Edge includes advanced Galaxy AI features like Generative Edit, Circle to Search and Cross-App Actions. Samsung commits to seven years of OS and security updates, setting a new standard in Android longevity. The 15W wireless charging, while Qi2-ready, is conservative compared to rivals offering 50W or more. Even wired charging tops out at 25W — practical, but not industry-leading. The 200MP main sensor captures detailed, sharp photos with rich colours and improved low-light performance. The 12MP ultrawide lens complements it well, and the 12MP front camera offers crisp selfies and 4K60 video — ideal for social content and video calls. Although the vapour chamber helps, the slim profile leads to more noticeable warmth during sustained use — particularly during gaming or multitasking — compared to the thicker S25 and Ultra models. Loud, clear stereo speakers, plus Wi-Fi 7, Bluetooth 5.4, USB-C 3.2 and Ultra-Wideband (UWB) ensure a premium multimedia and connectivity experience. Despite being slimmer and visually striking, it costs significantly more than the base Galaxy S25, while omitting the third rear camera and offering slightly lower battery capacity.   ViserMark Labels for the Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge Please take a look at the following information about the battery performance of the Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge : Battery Life: The Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge delivers a total of 34 hours of active use, which equates to roughly 1.5 days of moderate daily usage. While not groundbreaking, it’s a commendable result for such a slim device with a QHD+ panel and flagship internals. However, users who rely heavily on GPS, camera, or high screen brightness may find themselves needing a midday top-up, particularly given the phone’s modest 3,900mAh battery. Battery Charging: The S25 Edge supports 25W wired charging and 15W wireless (Qi2 Ready), with Samsung promising a 55% charge in 30 minutes. In testing, a full charge took approximately 1 hour and 25 minutes with a USB PD 3.0-compatible charger. Wireless speeds are slower, and performance depends on pad quality and thermal conditions. While acceptable for casual users, the charging speed feels dated compared to competitors like Xiaomi and OnePlus, which regularly exceed 80W. Battery Performance & Efficiency: Despite its slim profile, the Galaxy S25 Edge delivers surprisingly efficient power management. It matches the standard S25 in overall performance, thanks to intelligent thermal controls and a balanced power draw. Annual energy consumption remains modest, and the device maintains excellent efficiency in light-to-moderate tasks. Specification Overview  - Released Date: May 2025 Body & Build: Dimensions: 158.2 x 75.6 x 5.8 mm Weight: 163g Materials: Titanium frame, Gorilla Glass Ceramic 2 front, Victus 2 back Durability: IP68 certified – water and dust resistant (1.5m for 30 mins) Design: Ultra-slim, lightweight, with a premium ergonomic feel Display: Size: 6.7-inch LTPO AMOLED 2X Resolution: 3120 x 1440 (QHD+), ~513 ppi Refresh Rate: 120Hz adaptive Brightness: ~1416 nits peak (measured) HDR Support: HDR10+ Protection: Gorilla Glass Ceramic 2 Operating System: OS: Android 15 with One UI 7 Support: 7 years of OS & security updates Chipset & Performance: Processor: Snapdragon 8 Elite (3nm) CPU: 2x 4.47 GHz + 6x 3.53 GHz (Oryon V2) GPU: Adreno 830 Memory & Storage: Configurations: 256GB + 12GB RAM 512GB + 12GB RAM Expandable Storage: Not supported (no microSD) Tech: UFS 4.0 Connectivity & Features: 5G: Yes (Sub6 + mmWave depending on region) SIM: Nano + eSIM (max 2 lines) Wi-Fi: Wi-Fi 7 Bluetooth: 5.4 NFC / USB-C: Yes / USB-C 3.2 Biometrics: Ultrasonic in-display fingerprint reader Samsung DeX: Supported Audio: Stereo speakers Camera System: Rear Cameras: 200MP main (f/1.7, OIS) 12MP ultrawide (f/2.2, PDAF) Front Camera: 12MP (f/2.2, Dual Pixel PDAF) Video: Up to 8K (rear), 4K60 (front) Colours Available: Titanium IcyBlue, Titanium Silver, Titanium JetBlack Performance - HOW WE TEST ViserMark  offers a comprehensive range of battery performance test results based on different criteria and benchmarks for evaluating a smartphone's performance. Our tests are performed using the strictest protocol in a controlled environment to ensure repetition and consistency powered by SmartViser's test auto mation solution viSer . Translating technical specifications into consumer benefits with SmartViser VWS Analytics Studio  is a complementary product to the viSer Test Automation solution. It enhances the viSer user experience and is the fastest way to analyse and view smartphone test results. We have used the interactive dashboard to show you the recent test results and translated them into ViserMark Labels. Join our readers to receive the latest update to our smartphone battery performance scores and performance reviews as soon as we finish testing! Smartphone Battery Performance - FULL TEST RESULTS AND REVIEW ViserMark has put the Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge through our testing protocol, based on real smartphone usage from 100% battery level down to power off. This includes daily activities, such as calls, web, video and music streaming, gaming, social networks, picture and video capture, and standby. All activities are executed in a defined order and timeline.   These test results, show how the Samsung Galaxy S25   Edge performed and the scores achieved. 1. Battery Performance The Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge  achieved a battery performance score of 41/100 in ViserMark testing — matching both the standard Galaxy S25 and the S25 Ultra, yet sitting slightly below the Flagship/Pro Tier average of 41.58/100. While the score suggests reliable all-day performance under balanced usage, the Edge doesn’t push boundaries in battery optimisation, especially when compared to endurance leaders. Charging is handled via 25W wired power delivery, with Samsung advertising a 55% top-up in 30 minutes. In our real-world testing, the device reached full charge in 1 hour and 13 minutes using a certified USB PD charger. Wireless charging is supported at 15W (Qi2), but reverse wireless charging is not available, unlike the Ultra model. Overall, while the Galaxy S25 Edge isn’t a battery powerhouse, it holds its own considering its ultra-slim design. Users looking for exceptional portability and flagship-grade features will appreciate the compromise, though others may prefer a thicker device with longer battery life or faster charging. 2. Battery Life In ViserMark’s battery life testing, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge achieved 34 hours of continuous usage, which translates to just over 1.5 days of real-world battery life under typical conditions. This result is solid, especially considering the Edge’s ultra-slim 5.8mm profile and smaller 3,900mAh battery. Thanks to the Snapdragon 8 Elite chipset and Samsung’s One UI 7 power optimisations, the S25 Edge performs efficiently under balanced workloads. While it closely matches the regular Galaxy S25 (35 hours), it still underperforms against the Flagship/Pro Tier average of 40.91 hours, particularly during heavier tasks; Despite this, the S25 Edge provides reliable day-to-day stamina for light to moderate users. Its appeal lies in the combination of featherweight design, flagship performance, and premium build quality, even if that comes at the cost of slightly shorter screen-on time compared to bulkier devices. 3.   Battery Consumption The Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge and the Samsung Galaxy S25 were analysed for battery consumption across various daily tasks using SmartViser's viSer and VWS Analytics Studio . The comparison highlighted differences in power usage for activities such as social media, calls, gaming, camera, and web browsing. While both phones share the same Snapdragon 8 Elite chipset and One UI 7 software, the S25 Edge consumes significantly more power during social media use and outgoing calls, two tasks where its slimmer body and smaller battery seem to struggle with sustained connectivity and screen activity. However, the Edge proves more efficient in several other areas, including gaming, download/upload, camera usage, and media playback. This suggests that Samsung has managed to optimise certain performance aspects on the Edge variant, likely leveraging improved tuning or reduced thermal throttling in short bursts. Where the difference becomes most striking is in the Replay workload, where the S25 Edge consumes far more power than the standard model, suggesting its thermal envelope struggles to handle background-heavy or multitasking scenarios as efficiently. For YouTube streaming and web browsing, the gap narrows again, but the Edge still tends to consume slightly more, consistent with its QHD+ resolution and higher pixel density, which push the GPU harder even in light tasks. In conclusion, the Galaxy S25 Edge trades some endurance for its ultra-slim, high-res design, excelling in certain areas but clearly less suited for tasks requiring sustained processing or multitasking. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge and Galaxy S25 Ultra differ sharply in power consumption across key usage scenarios. While both offer flagship performance with Snapdragon 8 Elite internals, their battery behaviour reflects distinct design priorities. The Edge outperforms the Ultra in gaming, download/upload, camera use, and media playback, making it better suited for focused, short-session tasks. Both phones are nearly identical in YouTube consumption, suggesting similar screen efficiency for video playback. However, the Ultra consumes significantly more power during outgoing calls and replay scenarios, indicating that its larger size and feature set may demand more from the battery during background tasks or extended multitasking. Social media and web browsing are the only areas where the Edge consumes slightly more, though the differences are minor and unlikely to impact real-world use significantly. Overall, the Galaxy S25 Edge offers more efficient power usage in most scenarios, making it a compelling choice for users focused on balanced performance and portability. The Ultra, while more power-hungry, is still ideal for users demanding consistent high-end performance across the board. The battery performance comparison between the Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge, Galaxy S25, Galaxy S25 Ultra, and the Flagship/Pro Tier average reveals key differences in energy consumption across everyday activities, offering a clear look at how each device manages power in real-world scenarios. The Galaxy S25 Ultra, despite offering top-tier hardware and a premium QHD+ display, exhibits the highest current consumption across most tasks — particularly in outgoing calls and replay, where it significantly exceeds both its siblings and the average. It’s also the least efficient during gaming. That said, it does show some strengths: it matches the S25 Edge in YouTube playback and performs better than the average in camera usage, likely due to Samsung’s optimised image processing pipeline. The Galaxy S25 Edge, on the other hand, demonstrates more refined power management overall. It consumes less power than the Ultra in every category except social media and web browsing. It leads in gaming, camera, media playback, and download/upload, where it consistently shows the lowest drain. Its only clear drawback is Web browsing, where it registers the highest power consumption across all tested devices. Social media power usage is also slightly above average but still in line with the S25 Ultra. The standard Galaxy S25 sits somewhere in between, more efficient than the Ultra, though not as lean as the Edge. It handles camera, gaming, and upload/download tasks better than the Ultra but falls short of the Edge’s tighter energy control. Notably, it is more efficient than the Edge in social media and web browsing, two areas where the Edge dips. In short, if battery efficiency is your priority, the Galaxy S25 Edge offers standout performance in tasks like gaming, camera, download/upload, and media playback, but it does not consistently outperform the Flagship/Pro Tier average. In fact, it draws significantly more current in high-frequency use cases. 4.   Battery Efficiency In ViserMark’s battery efficiency testing, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge earned a full 1-leaf rating, indicating top-tier energy efficiency for a device in the flagship class. This score puts it on par with the regular Galaxy S25 and slightly ahead of the Flagship/Pro Tier average (0.98), confirming its status as one of the most power-efficient models in its category. Despite packing a high-resolution QHD+ display and the same Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy chip as the Ultra, the Edge benefits from its slimmer form factor, smaller 3,900mAh battery, and more thermally efficient design. These characteristics help reduce power draw in sustained workloads such as gaming, video playback, and camera use, contributing to longer-lasting real-world performance despite its compact build. The 1-leaf rating highlights Samsung’s successful optimisation of both hardware and software on the Edge variant. For users who value efficiency without sacrificing performance, the Galaxy S25 Edge stands out as one of the most balanced and energy-conscious premium smartphones available. 5.   Annual Energy Consumption According to ViserMark, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge has an estimated annual energy consumption of 3.7 kWh, matching the standard Galaxy S25 and performing slightly better than the Flagship/Pro Tier average of 3.8 kWh. While not the absolute lowest we've recorded, it still represents a strong result within the premium segment, especially considering its high-resolution display and flagship-grade internals. This level of efficiency suggests that the S25 Edge strikes a smart balance between performance and power draw, ideal for users who want a capable daily driver with less impact on long-term energy use compared to more power-hungry flagships like the S25 Ultra (4.5 kWh). In contrast, the Galaxy S25 Edge offers notable power savings without compromising on flagship-level performance. With efficient power management across most tasks and competitive annual energy consumption, it's a compelling option for those seeking a premium experience with better energy efficiency. While it may not boast the raw horsepower of the Ultra, it proves that you don’t need to burn through power to get a polished, high-end smartphone experience. Who Should Buy the Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge? The Galaxy S25 Edge is ideal for users who prioritise slim, premium design without giving up flagship-level features. Its ultra-thin 5.8 mm chassis, titanium build and vibrant QHD+ AMOLED display make it a standout choice for those who want style and performance in equal measure. Battery efficiency is one of its strongest suits. Despite the smaller 3,900mAh cell, it manages better-than-expected endurance for light to moderate use. It leads in power management for gaming, downloads and media playback, and its annual consumption matches the Galaxy S25 while staying below the flagship category average. It’s also well suited for users looking for long-term software support and versatile features like Samsung DeX and UWB. Content creators and casual gamers will appreciate its fast chip, fluid display and excellent camera for quick social sharing. However, it’s less appropriate for those who rely heavily on video calls, navigation or intense multitasking, where power consumption rises noticeably. Users needing long endurance under stress may prefer the standard S25 or a larger battery model. The S25 Edge is for those who want a sleek, efficient and modern flagship without the bulk. ViserMark VERDICT The Samsung Galaxy   S25 Edge - what's it like to use? Using the Galaxy S25 Edge feels like having a top-tier smartphone in an ultra-slim, elegant shell. The Snapdragon 8 Elite and 12GB RAM deliver fast, responsive performance for multitasking, gaming and creative apps, all while staying cool and efficient. One UI 7 runs flawlessly, with thoughtful AI tools that enhance productivity and photo editing without getting in the way. The 6.7-inch QHD+ AMOLED display is sharp, smooth and a pleasure for streaming or browsing. The titanium frame and slim profile make it incredibly comfortable to use one-handed, without compromising on build quality. Battery life is solid for moderate use, and energy efficiency shines during gaming, video playback, and day-to-day tasks. Charging is modest, but reliable. Overall, the S25 Edge combines flagship power and design finesse with smart battery management, ideal for users who want high performance in a lighter, more refined form. VCX (Valued Camera eXperience) The VCX Forum  has been working with its members on the system and infrastructure as a non-profit organisation. We strive to improve our technology to develop and exchange accurate and objective quality and performance indicators, which is our ultimate goal. We will also serve as a compass for the smartphone camera industry. We appreciate your interest in the VCX Forum. VCX Forum: No review Background The Samsung Group  is a South Korean multinational conglomerate headquartered in Samsung Town, Seoul. It comprises numerous affiliated businesses, most united under the Samsung brand. Samsung Electronics has assembly plants and sales networks in 74 countries and employs around 290,000 people. Samsung is a major manufacturer of electronic components such as lithium-ion batteries, semiconductors, image sensors, camera modules and displays for clients such as Apple, Sony, HTC and Nokia. Written by Marcella Frattari   is the Communication Marketing and Lead Generation Manager at SmartViser, playing a key role in shaping the company's communication and marketing strategies. With a background in journalism and a passion for digital communication, Marcella focuses on improving SmartViser's overall online presence and engagement. Her dedication to clear, effective communication and creative content makes her a valuable asset to the team. Press Contact Marcella Frattari: Contact@visermark.com Our Resources ViserMark Scores ViserMark Reviews Success Stories Latest Articles Discover what ViserMark is all about. Read ViserMark's latest in-depth smartphone battery reviews. Discover our main success stories with Telecoms and other industries. Read more articles on our battery life, performance reviews, and test results. Know more Know more Know more Know more

SMARTPHONE TIER: FLAGSHIP/PRO TIER Battery Capacity mAh: 5000 Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra: Big Performance, Bigger Battery Demands SMARTPHONE BATTERY PERFORMANCE Based on Price: Flagship/Pro Tier (€700+)  Flagship/Pro  Tier Ranking # 13 Learn more: Quick Summary ViserMark Labels Specifications Know the Test Results ViserMark Verdict Video Review - Soon Available Quick Summary The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is the pinnacle of Samsung’s smartphone innovation, offering an uncompromising flagship experience that blends cutting-edge hardware, intelligent AI features, and a refined design. From its expansive 6.9-inch display to its powerhouse performance and versatile camera system, the S25 Ultra delivers a best-in-class experience for power users, content creators, and productivity enthusiasts alike. At the heart of the S25 Ultra lies the Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Qualcomm’s most powerful chip to date, fabricated on an advanced 3nm process. Its octa-core architecture includes two high-performance Oryon V2 Phoenix L cores running at a blistering 4.47 GHz and six Phoenix M cores at 3.53 GHz, paired with the Adreno 830 GPU for fluid gaming and accelerated rendering. With 12GB of LPDDR5X RAM and UFS 4.0 storage up to 1TB, it handles multitasking, large file transfers, and demanding apps with ease. In benchmark testing, it stands tall with top-tier CPU and GPU scores, though under sustained load it shows moderate throttling — consistent with other flagships in its class. The S25 Ultra ’s 6.9-inch Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X display sets a new bar for brightness and clarity. With a resolution of 1440x3120 and peak brightness of 2600 nits, it offers superb legibility in bright conditions and deep, vibrant colours. The panel supports HDR10+, a 120Hz adaptive refresh rate, and Always-On Display. Despite some rivals boasting higher brightness in short bursts, Samsung’s anti-reflective Gorilla Armor 2 glass ensures excellent visibility with minimal glare. Samsung has crafted a device that’s not only premium in feel but more ergonomic than its predecessor. Now slimmer, narrower, and lighter at 218g, the Titanium Grade 5 frame offers enhanced durability and a refined aesthetic. Both front and rear are protected by Gorilla Glass Armor 2 and Victus 2, respectively, while the IP68 rating ensures resistance against dust and water immersion up to 1.5 metres for 30 minutes. Though some competitors now offer IP69 or deeper protection, the build remains among the most robust on the market. On the back, the quad-camera array continues to impress. The 200MP primary sensor captures highly detailed shots with rich dynamic range, while the upgraded 50MP ultrawide lens delivers broader perspectives with autofocus and improved low-light clarity. A 10MP 3x telephoto and 50MP 5x periscope camera ensure flexible framing and excellent optical zoom capabilities. Although not a dramatic leap from the S24 Ultra in hardware, improved ISP and AI-driven processing bring subtle yet meaningful enhancements in both daylight and night photography. The 12MP selfie camera with dual-pixel autofocus captures crisp, flattering shots and supports 4K60 video — perfect for vlogging or video conferencing. Where the Ultra impresses most is in its versatility. Despite a slightly conservative 5000mAh battery in an era where 6000mAh cells are emerging, it delivers solid endurance thanks to intelligent power management. In real-world mixed usage, it scores well in battery tests, outperforming the Pixel 9 Pro XL and closing in on the iPhone 16 Pro Max. Charging is rated at 45W wired and 25W wireless (Qi2), and Samsung’s updated charging tech means full-speed charging is now possible even with a standard 3A cable. A 30-minute top-up gets you to 72%, with a full charge in under an hour. The S Pen remains a defining feature, tucked into the bottom-left corner of the device. However, this year marks the loss of Bluetooth connectivity and Air Actions — a decision that has disappointed loyal Note fans. It still supports handwriting recognition, note-taking, and screen annotation, but remote camera shutter and gesture controls are gone. Software-wise, the Galaxy S25 Ultra ships with Android 15 and One UI 7, packed with new AI-powered features such as Cross-app Actions, AI Select, and natural language controls for seamless multitasking. Features like Generative Edit, Circle to Search, and Now Brief add convenience and productivity, while Samsung guarantees seven years of major Android and security updates, ensuring long-term value. Connectivity is futureproof, with support for 5G, eSIM, Wi-Fi 7, Bluetooth 5.4, NFC, and Ultra-Wideband (UWB). The ultrasonic fingerprint sensor under the display is fast and reliable, and stereo speakers deliver excellent clarity and loudness, with a subtle improvement in bass over the previous generation. Pros Cons The expansive 6.9-inch Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X panel offers QHD+ resolution, 120Hz adaptive refresh rate, HDR10+ support, and an impressive 2600 nits peak brightness. Samsung’s new Gorilla Glass Armor significantly reduces reflections, improving outdoor readability and content immersion. While still excellent, the camera hardware is largely unchanged from the S24 Ultra. Improvements are mostly software-based, with some rivals now offering better periscope zoom or low-light performance. Featuring a 3nm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy chip, the S25 Ultra delivers blazing-fast speeds across demanding tasks, with an Adreno 830 GPU for high-end gaming. Backed by 12GB LPDDR5X RAM and UFS 4.0 storage (up to 1TB), it’s a multitasking beast. The integrated S Pen no longer supports Bluetooth or Air Actions. While note-taking remains solid, the removal of remote control functionality has disappointed long-time Note users. Despite its conservative 5000mAh battery, the S25 Ultra offers strong endurance thanks to Samsung’s smart power management. It supports 45W wired and 25W wireless (Qi2) charging, reaching over 70% in just 30 minutes. At 45W wired and 25W wireless, charging speeds are behind competitors, who offer 80–100W fast charging. Samsung’s approach remains cautious, prioritising battery longevity. The 200MP main sensor, 50MP ultrawide, 10MP 3x zoom, and 50MP 5x periscope provide sharp, well-stabilised results. Improvements in ISP and AI processing offer better low-light detail and more natural colour reproduction. The 12MP front camera supports 4K60 and is ideal for creators. Like its smaller sibling, the Ultra offers no microSD slot. Users must choose their storage tier wisely, especially with large media files or offline libraries. Now lighter and slimmer than its predecessor, the Titanium Grade 5 frame and dual Gorilla Glass (Armor front / Victus 2 back) offer both robustness and style. The design is more comfortable in hand despite the large display. With only modest hardware upgrades over the S24 Ultra, some users may question the value—especially when last year’s model is still available at a discount. One UI 7 on Android 15 is packed with AI features like Circle to Search, Generative Edit, and Cross-App Actions. Samsung promises 7 years of OS and security updates, outpacing most of the competition. Despite design refinements, the 6.9-inch form factor remains bulky for smaller hands or pockets. It’s a true “Ultra” in every sense, for better or worse.   ViserMark Labels for the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Please take a look at the following information about the battery performance of the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra : Battery Life: The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra delivers 36 hours of total usage, translating to just under 1.5 days of typical battery life. While respectable for a flagship with a large QHD+ display and powerful internals, it lags slightly behind endurance-focused competitors. Heavy users may find themselves reaching for the charger before day’s end, especially when pushing screen brightness or using the camera extensively. Battery Charging: Samsung advertises 45W wired charging for the Galaxy S25 Ultra, claiming a 72% top-up in just 30 minutes. In our real-world testing, the device reached full charge in 1 hour and 12 minutes using a compatible USB PD 3.0 charger. Wireless charging via Qi2 supports up to 25W, though performance can vary depending on the charging pad used. While an improvement over previous models, Samsung’s charging speeds still lag behind rivals like Xiaomi and OnePlus, which now offer 80W or faster solutions. Battery Performance & Efficiency: The Galaxy S25 Ultra scores 36/100 in battery performance, indicating solid but not class-leading efficiency. Under sustained heavy use, thermal management kicks in early, leading to moderate throttling and a slight dip in battery stamina. Annual energy consumption is rated at 4.5 kWh, making it one of the more power-hungry options in its tier a trade-off for its high-performance chipset and ultra-bright display. Specification Overview  - Released Date: February 2025 Body & Build: Dimensions: 162.3 x 79.0 x 8.6 mm Weight: 218g Materials: Glass front (Corning Gorilla Glass Armor), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), Titanium Grade 5 frame Durability: IP68 certified – water and dust resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 minutes) Design: Refined and more ergonomic than its predecessor, with a slimmer profile and lighter build Display: Size: 6.9-inch Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X Resolution: 3120 x 1440 (WQHD+), ~505 ppi Refresh Rate: Adaptive 1–120Hz for smoother visuals and improved battery efficiency Brightness: Peak brightness up to 2600 nits for excellent outdoor visibility HDR Support: HDR10+ Always-On Display: Yes Protection: Corning Gorilla Glass Armor for reduced glare and increased scratch resistance Operating System: OS: Android 15 with One UI 7 Software Support: Up to 7 years of major OS updates and security patches – among the best in the industry Chipset & Performance: Processor: Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy (3nm) CPU: Octa-core (2x 4.47 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix L + 6x 3.53 GHz Phoenix M cores) GPU: Adreno 830 for high-end gaming and AI-powered graphics acceleration Memory & Storage: Configurations: 256GB UFS 4.0 + 12GB RAM 512GB UFS 4.0 + 12GB RAM 1TB UFS 4.0 + 12GB RAM Expandable Storage: Not supported (no microSD slot) Technology: UFS 4.0 storage for ultra-fast read/write speeds Connectivity & Features: 5G Connectivity: Yes, including Sub6 and mmWave (region dependent) SIM: Dual SIM (Nano + eSIM / Dual eSIM) Wi-Fi: Wi-Fi 7 (EHT320, MIMO, 4096-QAM) Bluetooth: 5.4 NFC: Yes USB: USB Type-C 3.2 Gen 2 Biometrics: Ultrasonic in-display fingerprint sensor Samsung DeX: Supported – both wired and wireless modes Audio: Stereo speakers tuned with Dolby Atmos Camera System: Rear Cameras (Quad Setup): 200MP Main Camera (f/1.7, OIS) – Captures highly detailed, vibrant shots in all lighting conditions 50MP Periscope Telephoto (5x optical zoom, OIS) – Ideal for distant subjects without loss of clarity 10MP Telephoto (3x optical zoom, OIS) – Versatile for portraits and close-ups 50MP Ultrawide (120˚ FOV, autofocus) – Enhanced clarity and edge detail, especially in low light Front Camera: 12MP (f/2.2, Dual Pixel PDAF) – High-quality selfies and smooth video calls Front Video Recording: 4K @ 30/60fps Video Capabilities: Rear Video Recording: 8K @ 24/30fps, 4K @ 30/60fps, 1080p @ 30/60/240fps Features: HDR10+, Super Steady stabilisation, gyro-EIS Colours Available: Titanium Jade Green, Titanium Pink Gold, Titanium Jet Black. Performance - HOW WE TEST ViserMark  offers a comprehensive range of battery performance test results based on different criteria and benchmarks for evaluating a smartphone's performance. Our tests are performed using the strictest protocol in a controlled environment to ensure repetition and consistency powered by SmartViser's test auto mation solution viSer . Translating technical specifications into consumer benefits with SmartViser VWS Analytics Studio  is a complementary product to the viSer Test Automation solution. It enhances the viSer user experience and is the fastest way to analyse and view smartphone test results. We have used the interactive dashboard to show you the recent test results and translated them into ViserMark Labels. Join our readers to receive the latest update to our smartphone battery performance scores and performance reviews as soon as we finish testing! Smartphone Battery Performance - FULL TEST RESULTS AND REVIEW ViserMark has put the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra through our testing protocol, based on real smartphone usage from 100% battery level down to power off. This includes daily activities, such as calls, web, video and music streaming, gaming, social networks, picture and video capture, and standby. All activities are executed in a defined order and timeline.   These test results, show how the Samsung Galaxy S25   Ultra performed and the scores achieved. 1. Battery Performance The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra  achieved a battery performance score of 41/100 in ViserMark testing, placing it on par with the standard Galaxy S25 and slightly below the Flagship/Pro Tier average (42.05/100). While it delivers a solid all-day experience under typical use, it falls behind leading competitors such as the Xiaomi 14T Pro, which scored 52/100, highlighting a notable gap in battery optimisation and endurance. In terms of charging, the S25 Ultra supports 45W wired charging, with Samsung advertising a 72% top-up in just 30 minutes. In real-world conditions, it reached full charge in approximately 1 hour and 12 minutes, which aligns fairly well with manufacturer claims. It also offers 25W wireless charging via Qi2 and 4.5W reverse wireless charging, adding convenience for users within the Samsung ecosystem. While the Galaxy S25 Ultra offers decent battery life and flexible charging, it doesn’t lead the category in efficiency or speed. For users prioritising endurance and rapid top-ups, options like the Xiaomi 14T Pro may provide better value, though the Ultra excels in other areas such as display, build quality, and productivity features. 2. Battery Life In ViserMark’s battery life testing, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra  achieved 36 hours of continuous usage, translating to approximately 1.5 days of real-world battery life under standard conditions. While this is a respectable result for a flagship device with a large, high-resolution display and powerful internals, it still trails behind top-performing rivals like the Xiaomi 14T Pro, which reached 52 hours in the same test. With a 5,000mAh battery, the Ultra model offers slightly better endurance than the regular Galaxy S25 (35 hours), despite both sharing the same power-efficient Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset and One UI 7 optimisations. However, compared to the Flagship/Pro Tier average of 40.91 hours, the S25 Ultra underperforms, suggesting room for improvement in power efficiency, especially when handling heavy workloads like camera use, multitasking, or extended gaming sessions. Nonetheless, the S25 Ultra delivers balanced performance and respectable longevity, making it a reliable choice for most users. While it may not lead the pack in raw battery endurance, its excellent display, camera capabilities, and productivity features more than compensate for slightly shorter battery life. 3.   Battery Consumption The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra and the Xiaomi 14T Pro were analysed for battery consumption across various daily tasks using SmartViser's viSer and VWS Analytics Studio . The comparison highlighted differences in power usage for activities such as social media, calls, gaming, camera, and web browsing. The results show that the Galaxy S25 Ultra consumes more power overall, particularly in social media, outgoing calls, gaming, and download/upload tasks. This reflects the Ultra’s demanding hardware, delivering class-leading performance but at a cost to energy efficiency. However, when it comes to camera usage, the Xiaomi 14T Pro is noticeably less efficient, consuming. This suggests that while the Xiaomi offers solid hardware, its camera processing or optimisation may be less refined, leading to higher energy demands during photo and video tasks. In other areas, the two devices show similar levels of power draw for youtube, email, media player and web browsing, though the S25 Ultra consumes slightly more, likely due to its higher screen resolution, more advanced multitasking capabilities, and added AI background processes. These differences reflect internal software and hardware tuning, with Samsung opting for maximum performance even at the cost of a bit more energy usage. The battery performance comparison between the   Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra  and the Samsung Galaxy S25 highlights notable differences in power consumption across various everyday activities, offering insights into which device is more efficient depending on the user’s habits. The Galaxy S25 consumes less power in nearly all categories, including social media, outgoing calls, gaming, camera use, YouTube streaming, media playback, downloads/uploads, and web browsing. These results indicate that the standard S25 is the more efficient option overall, especially for users who prioritise long battery life across a range of everyday activities. The only exception is email, where the S25 Ultra consumes slightly less power, potentially due to background task optimisations in One UI or more efficient management of background sync on the Ultra model. While the S25 Ultra is built for power users, the S25 strikes a stronger balance between performance and endurance, making it the more efficient choice for everyday use, especially for those who don’t require the extra screen size or camera flexibility of the Ultra model. The battery performance comparison between the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra , Galaxy S25, Xiaomi 14T Pro and Flagship/Pro Tier devices highlights significant differences in power efficiency across various everyday tasks. This analysis provides valuable insights into which smartphone delivers the best power management for different usage scenarios. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra delivers top-tier performance, but this comes with noticeably higher battery consumption across several everyday tasks. It consumes significantly more power than the Galaxy S25, Xiaomi 14T Pro, and the flagship/pro tier average in activities like social media, calls, and gaming. However, when it comes to camera usage, the Ultra is more efficient than the Xiaomi 14T Pro, showing Samsung’s advantage in optimised image processing. For media playback and youtube, power consumption is fairly similar across devices, though the Ultra still draws slightly more energy due to its larger QHD+ display and more demanding internals. Interestingly, the Galaxy S25 Ultra shows better efficiency in email usage than the S25, and outperforms the Xiaomi 14T Pro in web browsing, hinting at Samsung’s refined software optimisations for lighter productivity tasks. While its overall energy consumption is higher, the Ultra remains a compelling option for users who prioritise performance, multitasking, and premium media experiences, even if that means compromising slightly on battery efficiency. 4.   Battery Efficiency In ViserMark’s battery efficiency testing, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra  received a 0.5-leaf rating, indicating below-average energy efficiency for a device in the flagship category. This score places it behind both the Xiaomi 14T Pro and the regular Galaxy S25, which achieved full 1-leaf ratings. Despite featuring the powerful Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy and advanced AI optimisations, the S25 Ultra’s large 6.9-inch QHD+ display, 120Hz refresh rate, and demanding multi-camera setup appear to impact its overall power conservation. As a result, it consumes more energy under sustained workloads, which may lead to quicker battery drain during intensive use such as 4K video recording, multitasking, or gaming sessions. The 0.5-leaf rating reflects the trade-off between premium performance and power efficiency. While the Ultra delivers a top-tier experience in nearly every category—display, camera, software, and productivity—it comes at the cost of higher energy demands. For users who prioritise long battery life and optimal efficiency, the Galaxy S25 Ultra  may require more frequent recharges compared to leaner flagship alternatives. 5.   Annual Energy Consumption According to ViserMark, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has an estimated annual energy consumption of 4.5 kWh, making it one of the more power-hungry devices in the flagship segment. This figure places it above the flagship/pro-tier average of 3.78 kWh, and notably higher than both the Samsung Galaxy S25 (3.7 kWh) and Xiaomi 14T Pro (3.2 kWh). As previously explained, the higher consumption figure reflects the Galaxy S25 Ultra’s  premium specifications, including its expansive 6.9-inch QHD+ AMOLED display, powerful Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy chipset, and advanced quad-camera system. These features contribute to its class-leading performance, stunning visuals, and seamless multitasking, but naturally result in a greater energy demand compared to more compact or efficiency-focused models. Users considering the Galaxy S25 Ultra  should weigh its exceptional productivity and creative power against its higher annual consumption. Those prioritising energy efficiency over sheer performance may find leaner alternatives like the Galaxy S25 or Xiaomi 14T Pro more suitable. Nonetheless, for users who demand the best across all metrics (performance, visuals, and features) the S25 Ultra delivers, even if it uses a bit more power to get there. Who Should Buy the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra? The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is built for users who demand high-end performance, advanced camera capabilities, and long-term software support. With its Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy chip, 12GB of RAM, and up to 1TB of UFS 4.0 storage, it’s a solid choice for professionals, creatives, and gamers who need seamless multitasking and high-speed responsiveness. The 6.9-inch QHD+ AMOLED display offers a stunning visual experience, making it ideal for media consumption, content creation, and productivity on the go. However, it’s important to note that the S25 Ultra’s premium specs come with higher energy demands. As previously analysed, it consumes more power in key areas like social media, gaming, and calls than both the regular S25 and Xiaomi 14T Pro. That said, it’s still efficient in tasks such as email and web browsing—showing Samsung’s effort to optimise lighter usage. Users who value pro-grade photography (thanks to its 200MP quad-camera system), desktop-style productivity via Wireless DeX, and a premium build with Gorilla Glass Armor 2 and a Titanium frame will find the trade-off in power consumption acceptable. For those who prioritise raw capability over battery endurance, the S25 Ultra remains a flagship worth investing in. ViserMark VERDICT The Samsung Galaxy   S25 Ultra - what's it like to use? Using the Galaxy S25 Ultra feels like having a high-powered workstation in your pocket. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy and LPDDR5X RAM ensure apps launch instantly, multitasking is smooth, and gaming is seamless. Whether you're navigating One UI 7, running DeX on a monitor, or using Wi-Fi 7 for rapid data transfers, everything works effortlessly. The software is polished, intuitive, and enhanced by Samsung’s growing suite of AI features, which add smart shortcuts and creative tools without feeling gimmicky. The 6.9-inch AMOLED display is breathtaking—crisp, bright, and fluid—while the refined design feels premium and durable without being overly bulky. The camera system delivers consistently strong results across different scenarios, with noticeable improvements in low light and video stabilisation. Battery life holds up well despite the power-hungry hardware, and fast wired charging ensures minimal downtime. Overall, the Galaxy S25 Ultra is more than just powerful, it’s refined, dependable, and built to handle anything you throw at it. VCX (Valued Camera eXperience) The VCX Forum  has been working with its members on the system and infrastructure as a non-profit organisation. We strive to improve our technology to develop and exchange accurate and objective quality and performance indicators, which is our ultimate goal. We will also serve as a compass for the smartphone camera industry. We appreciate your interest in the VCX Forum. VCX Forum: Samsung S25 Ultra Camera Review Background The Samsung Group  is a South Korean multinational conglomerate headquartered in Samsung Town, Seoul. It comprises numerous affiliated businesses, most united under the Samsung brand. Samsung Electronics has assembly plants and sales networks in 74 countries and employs around 290,000 people. Samsung is a major manufacturer of electronic components such as lithium-ion batteries, semiconductors, image sensors, camera modules and displays for clients such as Apple, Sony, HTC and Nokia. Written by Marcella Frattari   is the Communication Marketing and Lead Generation Manager at SmartViser, playing a key role in shaping the company's communication and marketing strategies. With a background in journalism and a passion for digital communication, Marcella focuses on improving SmartViser's overall online presence and engagement. Her dedication to clear, effective communication and creative content makes her a valuable asset to the team. Press Contact Marcella Frattari: Contact@visermark.com Our Resources ViserMark Scores ViserMark Reviews Success Stories Latest Articles Discover what ViserMark is all about. Read ViserMark's latest in-depth smartphone battery reviews. Discover our main success stories with Telecoms and other industries. Read more articles on our battery life, performance reviews, and test results. Know more Know more Know more Know more

SMARTPHONE TIER: FLAGSHIP/PRO TIER Battery Capacity mAh: 4000 Samsung Galaxy S25: A Compact Flagship That Maximises Efficiency SMARTPHONE BATTERY PERFORMANCE Based on Price: Flagship/Pro Tier (€700+)  Flagship/Pro  Tier Ranking # 12 Learn more: Quick Summary ViserMark Labels Specifications Know the Test Results ViserMark Verdict Video Review - Soon Available Quick Summary The Samsung Galaxy S25 is a premium flagship that refines the Galaxy experience, offering cutting-edge performance, AI-driven software enhancements, and a compact, durable design. Combining powerful hardware with an intelligent software ecosystem, it sets a new standard for small yet capable smartphones. The 6.2-inch Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X display brings stunning colors, deep contrasts, and exceptional brightness, making it one of the best screens in its category. With a 1080x2340 resolution and 416 pixels per inch, it delivers crisp detail, while the 120Hz adaptive refresh rate ensures ultra-smooth scrolling and interactions. HDR10+ support enhances contrast and color accuracy, creating an immersive experience for streaming and gaming. The peak brightness of 2600 nits guarantees excellent outdoor visibility even under direct sunlight. The Always-On Display feature adds convenience by showing essential information at a glance. Powering the Galaxy S25 is the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite processor, built on a cutting-edge 3nm architecture for superior performance and efficiency. The octa-core CPU, featuring two high-performance Oryon V2 Phoenix L cores clocked at 4.47 GHz and six Oryon V2 Phoenix M cores at 3.53 GHz, ensures blazing-fast multitasking and seamless gaming. The Adreno 830 GPU enhances graphics performance, delivering smooth gameplay and efficient power consumption. The device is equipped with 12GB of LPDDR5X RAM and UFS 4.0 storage options ranging from 128GB to 512GB, providing ample space and lightning-fast data speeds. Samsung continues to refine its triple-camera system, delivering sharp, detailed, and stabilized shots in all conditions. The 50-megapixel main sensor, with an f/1.8 aperture and optical image stabilization, captures stunning images with great dynamic range and low-light performance. The 10-megapixel telephoto camera with 3x optical zoom ensures high-quality close-ups and portraits, while the 12-megapixel ultra-wide lens with a 120-degree field of view is perfect for capturing expansive landscapes and group shots. The Galaxy S25 supports 8K video recording at 24 and 30 frames per second, as well as 4K at 60 frames per second, ensuring cinema-quality footage. Video stabilization is enhanced with gyro-EIS and HDR10+ for smooth, detailed recordings. The 12-megapixel front camera with dual-pixel autofocus captures high-quality selfies and supports 4K video recording at 60 frames per second, making it an excellent choice for content creators and video calls. Despite its compact size, the Galaxy S25 houses a 4000mAh battery, optimized for all-day endurance. The device supports 25W wired charging via USB Power Delivery 3.0, reaching 50 percent in just 30 minutes. It also offers 15W Qi2.1 wireless charging, allowing for convenient cable-free power-ups, along with 4.5W reverse wireless charging, perfect for topping up accessories like Galaxy Buds or a smartwatch. The Galaxy S25 features a premium and durable design, with Gorilla Glass Victus 2 on both the front and back, ensuring resistance against scratches and minor impacts. Its Armor Aluminum 2 frame adds robustness while keeping the device lightweight at just 162 grams. It is IP68-certified for water and dust resistance, capable of withstanding immersion in water up to 1.5 meters deep for 30 minutes. The device is available in Icy Blue, Mint, Navy, and Silver Shadow, offering a sleek and modern aesthetic. Running One UI 7 on Android 15, the Galaxy S25 is designed for efficiency, AI-powered interactions, and seamless user experience. Samsung guarantees seven years of OS and security updates, ensuring longevity and sustained performance over time. The device also features Samsung DeX and Wireless DeX, transforming the smartphone into a desktop-like workstation when connected to a monitor or TV. The Galaxy S25 offers top-tier connectivity options, including 5G with eSIM support, Wi-Fi 7 for next-generation speeds, Bluetooth 5.4 for stable wireless connections, and NFC for seamless mobile payments and device pairing. The in-display ultrasonic fingerprint sensor provides fast and secure authentication, enhancing privacy and accessibility. Pros Cons The 6.2-inch Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X panel offers a 120Hz adaptive refresh rate, 2600 nits peak brightness, HDR10+ support, and an Always-On Display, ensuring vibrant visuals, fluid interactions, and excellent outdoor visibility. Same Design as Previous Models – While sleek and premium, the Galaxy S25’s design remains nearly identical to its predecessor, with only minor refinements. And price Remains High with Modest Upgrades Flagship-Grade Performance – Powered by the Snapdragon 8 Elite (3nm) chipset with an octa-core CPU and Adreno 830 GPU, delivering top-tier performance, AI-driven enhancements, and seamless gaming. No MicroSD Card Slot – Storage is non-expandable, requiring users to choose between 128GB, 256GB, or 512GB UFS 4.0 options from the start. Long-Term Software Support – Runs on Android 15 with One UI 7, featuring Samsung's Galaxy AI tools and promising 7 years of major OS upgrades and security updates, making it one of the most future-proof devices on the market. AI Features Still in Development – While Samsung’s Galaxy AI shows promise, some of its most anticipated features are still rolling out and may not be fully optimised at launch. Premium & Durable Build – Features Gorilla Glass Victus 2 on the front and back with an Armor Aluminum 2 frame for added durability. The IP68 water and dust resistance rating protects against accidental splashes and submersion. Small Battery Capacity for a Flagship – The 4000mAh battery is smaller than many competitors. Battery Degradation Concerns Over Time – With a smaller battery capacity and slow charging speeds, users may experience noticeable battery wear over time, reducing long-term endurance. Cutting-Edge Connectivity – Equipped with 5G, Wi-Fi 7, Bluetooth 5.4, NFC, eSIM, and Samsung DeX (both wired and wireless) for a seamless multitasking and high-speed connectivity experience. Samsung’s Software Can Be Overwhelming – While One UI 7 offers great customisation, it has many deep settings and menus that may feel complex or cluttered, especially for new users. Immersive Audio & AI-Enhanced Features – Stereo speakers with Dolby Atmos, AI-powered Circle to Search, Live Translate, and AI-driven editing tools make it a smartphone optimised for both work and entertainment. Limited Camera Upgrades – The 50MP+10MP+12MP camera system is solid but remains unchanged from last year’s model, while competitors offer higher megapixel counts and periscope zoom options.   ViserMark Labels for the Samsung Galaxy S25 Please take a look at the following information about the battery performance of the Samsung Galaxy S25 : Battery Life: The Samsung Galaxy S25 delivers 35 hours of total usage, which translates to approximately 1.5 days of battery life under normal use. While respectable, this is slightly lower than some competitors in the flagship tier, making mid-day charging necessary for power users. Battery Charging: While Samsung claims the Galaxy S25 can reach 50% in 30 minutes with its 25W wired charging, real-world tests showed slightly slower charging times. In testing, a full charge took 1 hour and 19 minutes, meaning the device doesn't reach 100% in just one hour as expected. Battery Performance & Efficiency: The Galaxy S25 scores 41/100 in battery performance, reflecting balanced efficiency but room for improvement in endurance under heavy workloads. The annual energy consumption is 3.7 kWh, meaning the device consumes more power than some of its rivals, but remains within the expected range for flagship devices. Specification Overview  - Released Date: February 2025 Body & Build: Dimensions: 146.9 x 70.5 x 7.2 mm Weight: 162g Materials: Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), aluminum frame. Durability: IP68-rated (dust and water resistance up to 1.5m for 30 minutes). Design: Armor Aluminum 2 for enhanced durability Display: Size: 6.2-inch Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X Resolution: 2340 x 1080 pixels (FHD+) 416 ppi Refresh Rate: 120Hz adaptive for smooth scrolling and power efficiency Brightness: Peak brightness of 2600 nits for excellent outdoor visibility HDR Support: HDR10+ compatibility for vivid contrast and enhanced color accuracy Always-on Display: Yes Operating System: Android 15 with One UI 7 Software Support:  Up to 7 major Android updates, making it one of the longest-supported smartphones on the market Chipset & Performance: Processor: Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy (US/China) / Exynos 2400 (International) CPU: Octa-core (2x 4.47 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix L + 6x 3.53 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix M) GPU: Adreno 830 for high-performance gaming and graphics Memory & Storage: Configurations: 128GB UFS 4.0 + 12GB RAM 256GB UFS 4.0 + 12GB RAM 512GB UFS 4.0 + 12GB RAM UFS 4.0 for faster read/write speeds Expandable Storage: No microSD card slot Connectivity & Features: Network: 5G-ready (Sub6 FDD & TDD, SDL support) with Dual SIM (Nano-SIM + eSIM / Dual eSIM support) Wi-Fi: Wi-Fi 7 (EHT320, MIMO, 4096-QAM) for ultra-fast speeds Bluetooth: 5.4 with improved energy efficiency NFC: Yes (availability varies by region) USB Port: USB Type-C 3.2 Gen 1 Samsung DeX: Supports both wired and wireless desktop experience Fingerprint Sensor: Ultrasonic under-display for fast and secure unlocking Audio: Stereo speakers with Dolby Atmos Location Services: GPS, Glonass, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS Camera System: Rear Cameras (Triple-lens Setup) 50MP Main (f/1.8, 24mm, OIS, Dual Pixel PDAF) – Delivers excellent detail, dynamic range, and low-light performance 10MP Telephoto (f/2.4, 67mm, 3x optical zoom, OIS, PDAF) – Sharp zoomed-in shots without loss of detail 12MP Ultrawide (f/2.2, 120° FOV, Super Steady video, 1.4µm) – Ideal for landscapes and group photos Video Capabilities Rear Video Recording: 8K @ 24/30fps, 4K @ 30/60fps, 1080p @ 30/60/240fps, HDR10+, gyro-EIS Front Video Recording: 4K @ 30/60fps, 1080p @ 30fps Front Camera 12MP (f/2.2, Dual Pixel PDAF, 1/3.2”) – Delivers high-quality selfies and sharp video calls Colours Available: Navy, Icy Blue, Silver Shadow, Mint. Performance - HOW WE TEST ViserMark  offers a comprehensive range of battery performance test results based on different criteria and benchmarks for evaluating a smartphone's performance. Our tests are performed using the strictest protocol in a controlled environment to ensure repetition and consistency powered by SmartViser's test auto mation solution viSer . Translating technical specifications into consumer benefits with SmartViser VWS Analytics Studio  is a complementary product to the viSer Test Automation solution. It enhances the viSer user experience and is the fastest way to analyse and view smartphone test results. We have used the interactive dashboard to show you the recent test results and translated them into ViserMark Labels. Join our readers to receive the latest update to our smartphone battery performance scores and performance reviews as soon as we finish testing! Smartphone Battery Performance - FULL TEST RESULTS AND REVIEW ViserMark has put the Samsung Galaxy S25 through our testing protocol, based on real smartphone usage from 100% battery level down to power off. This includes daily activities, such as calls, web, video and music streaming, gaming, social networks, picture and video capture, and standby. All activities are executed in a defined order and timeline.   These test results, show how the Samsung Galaxy S25  performed and the scores achieved. 1. Battery Performance The Samsung Galaxy S25  achieved a battery performance score of 41/100 in ViserMark testing, positioning it slightly behind the Samsung Galaxy S24 (42/100) and Samsung Galaxy S24 FE (42/100) but close to the Flagship/Pro Tier average (41.64/100). While it does not lead the category in battery efficiency, it delivers a balanced experience for everyday use. Beyond endurance, the Galaxy S25 ’s charging efficiency presents a mixed experience. While Samsung advertises 25W wired charging, real-world tests show that the device reaches 50% in 30 minutes but takes approximately 1 hour and 19 minutes to reach full charge—slower than many of its high-end competitors. Additionally, it supports 15W wireless charging and 4.5W reverse wireless charging, offering flexibility but falling short of the ultra-fast charging speeds seen in rival flagship devices. This combination of moderate battery life, average charging speeds, and flexible charging options makes the Samsung Galaxy S25 a solid choice for users within the Samsung ecosystem. However, those prioritising faster charging and extended battery endurance may find other flagship alternatives more appealing. 2. Battery Life In ViserMark's battery life testing, the Samsung Galaxy S25 delivered 35 hours of continuous usage, translating to approximately 1.5 days of real-world use. While this ensures a full day of moderate to heavy activity without frequent recharges, it falls slightly behind some competing flagship devices with larger battery capacities. Despite having the same battery size as the Samsung Galaxy S24 (4,000mAh) and a smaller capacity compared to the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE (4,700mAh), the Galaxy S25 still manages to hold its own, thanks to Samsung's optimised power management and efficient Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset. The Samsung Galaxy S25 still delivers a balanced power experience, offering reliable all-day battery life with intelligent power management, while benefiting from a compact and lightweight form factor. For users who prioritise efficiency over raw battery capacity, the Galaxy S25 remains a compelling choice within the premium smartphone segment. 3.   Battery Consumption The Samsung Galaxy S25 and Samsung Galaxy S24 FE were analysed for battery consumption across various daily tasks using SmartViser's viSer and VWS Analytics Studio . The comparison highlighted differences in power usage for activities such as social media, calls, gaming, camera, and web browsing. Notably, the Galaxy S25 consumes less power in social media, calls, gaming, camera usage, media player, and web browsing, making it a more efficient choice for users who engage in multimedia creation and high-performance tasks. However, the Galaxy S24 FE shows lower power consumption in download/uploads, YouTube, and email, which may make it slightly better for users who spend more time streaming videos and handling cloud-based tasks. Despite having a smaller 4,000mAh battery compared to the S24 FE ’s 4,700mAh, the Galaxy S25 maintains strong battery performance thanks to its Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset and improved power efficiency optimisations. This allows it to compete closely with the S24 FE in endurance while offering superior efficiency in high-performance activities. Ultimately, users who prioritise gaming, photography, and media playback may prefer the Galaxy S25, while those who focus more on video streaming and cloud-based productivity might find the S24 FE a slightly better fit. The battery performance comparison between the Samsung Galaxy S25 and Samsung Galaxy S24  highlights notable differences in power consumption across various everyday activities, offering insights into which device is more efficient depending on the user’s habits. The Samsung Galaxy S24 consumes less power in social media browsing and outgoing calls compared to the Galaxy S25 . This suggests that the S24 is better optimised for background-intensive communication tasks, making it a stronger choice for users who frequently engage in social media and voice calls. For video streaming (YouTube) and downloading/uploading, the Samsung Galaxy S25 has higher power consumption than the Galaxy S24 . This could be attributed to its more powerful Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset and display enhancements, which demand more energy during high-resolution content processing. For gaming, while the S25 has lower power consumption compared to the S24 , the impact of its display features—such as refresh rate and brightness—should also be considered. The S25’s LTPO Dynamic AMOLED 2X display with 120Hz refresh rate ensures smoother visuals, but depending on brightness settings and gaming graphics intensity, power consumption can fluctuate. The S25 remains a more efficient gaming option overall, but prolonged gameplay sessions at higher brightness and refresh rates could lead to increased battery drain compared to standard settings. When it comes to email management, the Galaxy S25 consumes more battery compared to the S24 , meaning the S24 is more efficient for professionals or users who frequently check and send emails. For web browsing, both devices have nearly equal power consumption, with the S25 consuming slightly more energy. The difference is marginal, meaning users won’t notice a major impact in daily usage. For photography and camera usage, the Galaxy S24 is more battery-efficient than the S24, meaning it consumes less power when capturing photos and recording videos. This makes the S25 a better option for users who frequently use their cameras. However, for media playback (watching videos and listening to music), the Galaxy S24 is more power-efficient, consuming less battery than the S25. This suggests that users who prioritise long hours of video streaming or music playback might find the S24 a better fit in terms of battery life. The battery performance comparison between the Samsung Galaxy S25 , Samsung Galaxy S24 FE , Samsung Galaxy S24 , and Flagship/Pro Tier devices highlights significant differences in power efficiency across various everyday tasks. This analysis provides valuable insights into which smartphone delivers the best power management for different usage scenarios. Here's an overview of the findings: Social Media & Communication: The Samsung Galaxy S24 FE  exhibits the highest power consumption in social media usage and outgoing calls, making it the least efficient for users who frequently browse social media or make voice calls. The Samsung Galaxy S25  consumes significantly less power in these tasks, making it a more power-conscious choice for communication-heavy users. The Samsung Galaxy S24  is the most efficient in this category, with the lowest power draw. Gaming & Multimedia: For gaming, the Galaxy S25  is more efficient than the S24 FE , and the S24  performs slightly better than the FE variant. When it comes to media consumption, the Galaxy S25  and S24  show better power efficiency in video and music playback, while the S24 FE consumes more power. Productivity & Web Browsing: Email usage is more power-intensive on the S25  compared to the S24 FE , but the S24 remains the most efficient in this category. Web browsing shows minimal differences, with the S25 and S24 being slightly more efficient than the S24 FE . Camera & Media Playback: The Samsung Galaxy S25 is the most efficient for photography and video recording, consuming less power during camera use compared to the S24 FE and S24 . However, for media playback, the Galaxy S24 is the best choice, consuming the least power, followed by the S25 , with the   S24 FE consuming the most battery. 4.   Battery Efficiency In ViserMark's battery efficiency testing, the Samsung Galaxy S25  was awarded a 1-leaf rating, indicating moderate power efficiency. This rating suggests that while the S25 delivers solid performance, it does not lead in energy conservation compared to some competitors. The S25 shares the same 1-leaf rating with the Samsung Galaxy S24  and  S24 FE , meaning all three devices offer a similar balance between performance and power consumption. Despite its more advanced Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset, the S25 does not achieve a higher efficiency score, suggesting that its improvements in power management are balanced out by increased performance demands. While the battery efficiency rating is not the highest, the Galaxy S25  still ensures a strong overall experience, with smooth multitasking, efficient gaming, and high-quality media playback. However, users who prioritise battery longevity over high performance may need to recharge more frequently compared to other energy-efficient alternatives. 5.   Annual Energy Consumption The ViserMark label indicates that the Samsung Galaxy S25  has an estimated annual energy consumption of 3.7 kWh, making it one of the more efficient flagship devices in terms of power usage. Compared to its competitors, the Galaxy S25  is more energy-efficient than the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE, which has a higher annual consumption of 4.1 kWh, indicating that the   S24 FE may require more frequent recharges over a year. Meanwhile, the Samsung Galaxy S24 consumes slightly more energy than the S25 at 3.8 kWh, while the flagship/pro-tier category average sits at 3.77 kWh, placing the S25 just below the segment average in efficiency. This data highlights that the Galaxy S25 offers an optimal balance between high performance and power efficiency, ensuring a competitive energy footprint while still delivering flagship-grade features. Who Should Buy the Samsung Galaxy S25? Introducing the Samsung Galaxy S25 , perfect for various user profiles: Social Media & Communication-Heavy Users: For users who spend a significant amount of time on social media and making calls, the Samsung Galaxy S25 is a more efficient choice than the Galaxy S24 FE. It consumes less power when browsing, posting, and messaging across platforms, allowing longer usage without excessive battery drain. The compact and lightweight design also makes it easy to use one-handed, and the super-bright 2600-nit AMOLED display ensures great visibility even in direct sunlight. If you rely on your phone for constant connectivity and high-quality video calls, the 12MP front camera with 4K video support makes the experience even better. Power Users Who Prioritize Performance: If you want a powerful and fast phone for multitasking, productivity, and gaming, the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset inside the Galaxy S25 offers cutting-edge performance. Apps launch quickly, gaming is smooth, and Samsung’s AI-powered One UI 7 optimisations ensure efficiency. Despite having a smaller 4,000mAh battery compared to competitors, the device remains highly optimised for performance-heavy tasks like gaming and high-resolution content processing. Photography Enthusiasts Who Want Efficiency: The Samsung Galaxy S25 outperforms the Galaxy S24 in battery efficiency for photography, making it a great option for users who frequently take photos and videos. Its triple-camera system with a 50MP main sensor, 10MP telephoto (3x zoom), and 12MP ultrawide lens ensures high-quality, stabilised shots. The phone also consumes less battery during camera use compared to the S24 FE, making it a stronger choice for mobile photographers who want to shoot without worrying about rapid battery drain. Future-Proof Buyers Looking for Long-Term Support: If you want a smartphone that will last for years, the Galaxy S25 is one of the best choices. Samsung offers 7 years of OS and security updates, meaning this device will remain supported until 2032—outlasting many competitors. This makes it an excellent investment for users who don’t upgrade frequently but still want the latest features and security. ViserMark VERDICT The Samsung Galaxy S25 - what's it like to use? The Samsung Galaxy S25 is a premium flagship smartphone that offers top-tier performance, advanced AI features, and a compact, durable design. It's powered by the Snapdragon 8 Elite chipset, paired with 12GB of RAM and UFS 4.0 storage, ensuring fast multitasking, high-speed gaming, and smooth everyday performance. The device supports 5G connectivity and Wi-Fi 7, providing ultra-fast data speeds for users who demand seamless connectivity. The 6.2-inch Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X display is among the best in its category, offering stunning colors, deep contrasts, and ultra-smooth motion. With a 120Hz adaptive refresh rate, HDR10+ support, and an impressive 2600-nit peak brightness, it delivers exceptional outdoor visibility and vibrant visuals. The Always-On Display ensures quick access to important information without unlocking the phone, adding extra convenience for daily use. The Galaxy S25 maintains Samsung’s premium build quality, featuring Gorilla Glass Victus 2 on both the front and back for scratch resistance and durability. The Armor Aluminum 2 frame keeps the phone lightweight at just 162 grams, while the IP68 rating ensures dust and water resistance. Available in Icy Blue, Mint, Navy, and Silver Shadow, the sleek and modern design remains one of the most polished in the industry. With a 4,000mAh battery, the Galaxy S25 delivers up to 1.5 days of battery life, and while charging speeds (25W wired, 15W wireless) aren't the fastest, the phone remains efficient for daily use thanks to Samsung’s software optimizations. Samsung has refined its triple-camera setup, ensuring sharp, detailed, and stabilized shots in all conditions. The 50MP main sensor with OIS captures high-quality images, the 10MP telephoto lens provides 3x optical zoom for clear close-ups, and the 12MP ultra-wide camera is perfect for landscape and group shots. For video, the Galaxy S25 supports 8K recording at 24/30fps and 4K at 60fps, delivering cinema-grade footage. The 12MP front camera with dual-pixel autofocus ensures sharp selfies and 4K video recording, making it a great choice for content creators and video calls. Its premium build (Gorilla Glass Victus 2, Armor Aluminum 2, IP68-rated design) makes it durable yet lightweight, while One UI 7 on Android 15 delivers AI-powered features and long-term support (7 years of updates). Samsung DeX and Wireless DeX remain standout features for those who want a desktop-like experience from their phone. Pairing the device with a monitor or TV worked flawlessly in our tests, making multitasking seamless. The Samsung Galaxy S25 doesn’t break new ground, but it perfects what already worked well. It offers flagship-tier performance, a stunning display, and a reliable camera system in a compact form factor. However, battery life, charging speeds, and the lack of design innovation might leave some users wanting more. If you value compact design, premium build, and long-term software support, the Galaxy S25 is an excellent choice. But if battery endurance or groundbreaking camera features are your priority, some competitors might be more appealing. VCX (Valued Camera eXperience) The VCX Forum  has been working with its members on the system and infrastructure as a non-profit organisation. We strive to improve our technology to develop and exchange accurate and objective quality and performance indicators, which is our ultimate goal. We will also serve as a compass for the smartphone camera industry. We appreciate your interest in the VCX Forum. No VCX reviews are available for this smartphone.   Background The Samsung Group  is a South Korean multinational conglomerate headquartered in Samsung Town, Seoul. It comprises numerous affiliated businesses, most united under the Samsung brand. Samsung Electronics has assembly plants and sales networks in 74 countries and employs around 290,000 people. Samsung is a major manufacturer of electronic components such as lithium-ion batteries, semiconductors, image sensors, camera modules and displays for clients such as Apple, Sony, HTC and Nokia. Written by Marcella Frattari   is the Communication Marketing and Lead Generation Manager at SmartViser, playing a key role in shaping the company's communication and marketing strategies. With a background in journalism and a passion for digital communication, Marcella focuses on improving SmartViser's overall online presence and engagement. Her dedication to clear, effective communication and creative content makes her a valuable asset to the team. Press Contact Marcella Frattari: Contact@visermark.com Our Resources ViserMark Scores ViserMark Reviews Success Stories Latest Articles Discover what ViserMark is all about. Read ViserMark's latest in-depth smartphone battery reviews. Discover our main success stories with Telecoms and other industries. Read more articles on our battery life, performance reviews, and test results. Know more Know more Know more Know more

SMARTPHONE TIER: ENTRY TIER Battery Capacity mAh: 5000 HMD Pulse Pro Smartphone Review: Pulse of Performance: The HMD Pulse Pro Balances Power and Longevity SMARTPHONE BATTERY PERFORMANCE Based on Price: Entry (€0-€199)  Entry Ranking # 3 Learn more: Quick Summary ViserMark Labels Specifications Know the Test Results ViserMark Verdict Video Review Available Soon Quick Summary The HMD Pulse Pro, announced in April 2024, is an Android smartphone with strong performance and exceptional battery life. It is an attractive option for users seeking efficiency and affordability. One of the standout features of the Pulse Pro is its 6.65-inch IPS LCD display, with a smooth 90Hz refresh rate and a 720x1612 pixels resolution. The display provides an immersive viewing experience, ideal for media consumption and daily use, with a screen-to-body ratio of approximately 86.8%. The device is powered by the Unisoc T606 chipset, featuring an octa-core CPU and a Mali-G57 MP1 GPU, ensuring reliable and consistent performance across various tasks. It comes with 128GB of internal storage and offers three RAM options: 4GB, 6GB, or 8GB, catering to different user needs. The dual rear camera setup features a 50 MP wide lens with autofocus, a 2 MP depth sensor and a front-facing 50 MP camera for high-quality selfies. The phone's 5000 mAh battery is another standout feature, offering an impressive 55 hours of battery life according to ViserMark testing. This battery supports 20W wired charging, allowing quick recharges in 2 hours and 18 minutes. The HMD Pulse Pro also comes with a side-mounted fingerprint sensor, NFC, and a USB Type-C 2.0 port for enhanced practicality and security. Available in Black Ocean, Glacier Green, and Twilight Purple colour options, the device combines style with a comprehensive feature set, ensuring that users are well-equipped for their daily tasks. The Pulse Pro offers great value for money, particularly considering its robust battery life and comprehensive feature set. Overall, the HMD Pulse Pro is an excellent choice for users looking for a budget-friendly smartphone with long battery life, a solid camera system, and reliable performance for everyday tasks. Pros Cons Great battery life of 2 days of use Reasonable performance for an Entry Tier smartphone Good value Adequate camera performance Software and security updates guaranteed Long charging time   ViserMark Labels for the HMD Pulse Pro The HMD Pulse Pro impresses with its battery performance, as confirmed by recent ViserMark testing. The smartphone boasts a battery life of 2 days (55 hours), which positions it as a reliable option for users seeking longevity in their smartphone use. This endurance is paired with a charging time of 2 hours and 18 minutes, ensuring the phone can be quickly powered up when needed. Despite its impressive battery life, the HMD Pulse Pro received a Battery Performance score of 48/100, indicating that while the battery lasts long, there might be areas where efficiency could be improved. Moreover, the Pulse Pro's energy efficiency is highlighted by a Battery Efficiency rating of 1.5 out of 5 leaves, reflecting a moderate balance between power consumption and battery size. The device's Annual Energy Consumption is calculated at 2.9 kWh per annum, which is standard for smartphones in its category. Overall, these results suggest that the HMD Pulse Pro is well-suited for users prioritising battery life. Specification Overview  - Released Date: April 2024 Body: 163.2 x 75 x 8.6 mm , weight 196g. Corning Gorilla Glass Victus Display : 6.65 inches, IPS LCD, 90Hz with 720 x 1612 resolution. Dust and splash-resistant. Nano-SIM Operating System : Android 14 Chipset :   Unisoc T606 (12 nm) , Octa-core processor Memory : 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM . microSDXC Connectivity :  Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n / ac, Bluetooth: Yes. NFC: Yes. Loudspeaker: Yes. 3.5mm Jack: Yes Camera : Set-up - Main: 50MP (wide) 2 MP (depth) with LED flash, HDR. Video1080p@30fps Front Camera:  50 MP and Video Battery : 5000mAh, 20 W wired Colour : Black Ocean, Glacier Green, Twilight Purple Discover all the Battery Performance Test Results Learn more about the HMD Pulse Pro Smartphone Battery Performance - HOW WE TEST ViserMark  offers a comprehensive range of battery performance test results based on different criteria and benchmarks for evaluating a smartphone's performance. Our tests are performed using the strictest protocol in a controlled environment to ensure repetition and consistency powered by SmartViser's test auto mation solution viSer . Translating technical specifications into consumer benefits with SmartViser VWS Analytics Studio  is a complementary product to the viSer Test Automation solution. It enhances the viSer user experience and is the fastest way to analyse and view smartphone test results. We have used the interactive dashboard to show you the recent test results and translated them into ViserMark Labels. Discover the Battery Test Results Learn more about the HMD Pulse Pro   Join our readers to receive the latest update to our smartphone battery performance scores and performance reviews as soon as we finish testing! Smartphone Battery Performance - FULL TEST RESULTS AND REVIEW ViserMark has put the HMD Pulse Pro  through our testing protocol, based on real smartphone usage from 100% battery level down to power off. This includes daily activities, such as calls, web, video and music streaming, gaming, social networks, picture and video capture, and standby. All activities are executed in a defined order and timeline. These test results, show how the HMD Pulse Pro  performed and the scores achieved. 1. Battery Performance The HMD Pulse Pro stands out as the leader in battery performance among its competitors in the Entry Tier smartphone segment, scoring 48 out of 100. This positions it ahead of similar models like the Xiaomi A2 and Motorola Moto G34 , which scored 44 and 43 respectively. Despite the small margin, this slight edge in battery performance could translate into noticeable benefits for users, such as longer usage time between charges and more efficient power management, making the Pulse Pro an appealing choice for those who prioritise battery life. However, the narrow gap between these smartphones highlights a consistent focus on reliable battery life across the Entry Tier (€0-€199) market. The close scores suggest that while the HMD Pulse Pro leads, competitors like the Xiaomi A2 and Motorola Moto G34 are also strong contenders, offering similar battery performance. This consistency emphasises the importance of battery life in this segment, where consumers often seek the best value. Nonetheless, the HMD Pulse Pro's position at the top suggests it is better suited for users looking for that extra bit of endurance from their smartphone. 2. Battery Life The HMD Pulse Pro stands out in the Entry Tier smartphone segment, leading the pack with its superior battery life. It offers an impressive 2 days of continuous use or 55 hours if translated into hours on a single charge, outlasting competitors like the Motorola Moto G34 and Xiaomi A2 , which offer around 53 and 54 hours, respectively. This extended battery life makes the Pulse Pro an attractive choice for users who prioritise endurance and want a device that can comfortably last more than two days without recharging. However, the consistency of 2 days of use in battery life between the HMD Pulse Pro and its rivals highlights the strength of the Entry Tier segment in delivering reliable battery life. All phones compared exceed 50 hours of use and approach or surpass 2 days of battery life, indicating that manufacturers are successfully meeting the demands of budget-conscious consumers who value longevity. While the Pulse Pro holds a slight edge, the strong performance of its competitors means that users may also consider other factors, such as design or camera quality, alongside battery life, when making their purchasing decisions. 3.   Battery Consumption The  HMD Pulse Pro  battery life details, as analysed using SmartViser's  viSer and VWS Analytics Studio , provide a technical and detailed perspective on the smartphone's battery consumption. The platform's capability to monitor and access real-time test results explains how it manages power under various daily user tasks. The battery performance comparison between the HMD Pulse Pro and the Motorola Moto G34 uncovers intriguing differences in power consumption across various tasks. Notably, the HMD Pulse Pro consumes more power than the Moto G34 during outgoing calls. This higher current draw suggests that the Pulse Pro may be utilising more powerful hardware or processing capabilities, potentially delivering better performance but at the cost of battery efficiency. This insight is crucial for users who value performance but also need to manage their phone's battery life. Another significant insight from the data is the substantial power draw of the   Motorola Moto G34 during camera usage. It exhibits a higher current consumption compared to the HMD Pulse Pro, indicating that it may be supporting more advanced camera features or better image processing. This could be a boon for users who prioritise photography, as they could enjoy enhanced camera functionality, even if it means sacrificing some battery life. This understanding of the trade-off between camera features and battery life is valuable for users who are photography enthusiasts. Interestingly, the web browsing and media playback activities show less discrepancy between the two smartphones, with both phones exhibiting similar power consumption levels. This implies that the HMD Pulse Pro and the Moto G34 are well-optimised for these tasks, offering users a balanced experience without excessively draining the battery. The analysis suggests that the HMD Pulse Pro is more performance-oriented, which might appeal to users who value advanced features and are willing to trade off some battery efficiency for better overall performance. Conversely, the Motorola Moto G34 offers more conservative power management, making it a better option for users who prioritise battery longevity and efficiency in their day-to-day activities. This comparison highlights the importance of considering performance and battery life based on user needs and usage patterns. The battery performance comparison between the HMD Pulse Pro and the Xiaomi A2 reveals several interesting trends that highlight differences in how these two smartphones manage power consumption across various tasks. One of the most notable observations is that the HMD Pulse Pro consumes more power than the Xiaomi A2 in nearly all usage scenarios. This trend suggests that the Pulse Pro may be utilising more powerful hardware or processing more intensive tasks, leading to higher current consumption across the board. For instance, during social media usage and outgoing calls, the HMD Pulse Pro  exhibits significantly higher current consumption than the Xiaomi A2 . This could imply that the Pulse Pro is handling these tasks more aggressively, possibly due to higher processing demands or less efficient power management. In contrast, the Xiaomi A2's more restrained power consumption could potentially lead to better battery longevity, empowering users who heavily engage in these activities. Interestingly, the power consumption difference between the two devices in gaming and media playback is less pronounced, though the HMD Pulse Pro still consumes slightly more power. This suggests that both devices are well-optimised for these power-intensive activities. Still, the higher consumption of Pulse Pro might be tied to better performance or higher-quality graphics processing. Overall, the data suggests that while the HMD Pulse Pro may offer stronger performance or more advanced features, it comes at the cost of increased power consumption. For users who prioritise efficiency and longer battery life, particularly during everyday tasks like social media, calling, and video playback, the Xiaomi A2 might be the better choice. Conversely, users who value higher performance and don't mind sacrificing some battery efficiency for it may find the HMD Pulse Pro more appealing. This analysis underscores the importance of respecting individual user needs and preferences when balancing performance with power management. The in-depth battery performance comparison among the HMD Pulse Pro, Motorola Moto G34 , and Xiaomi A2 , and their performance against the entry-tier segment average, uncovers several intriguing insights into how these smartphones manage power across a range of everyday tasks. Firstly, the HMD Pulse Pro consistently exhibits higher power consumption across most activities when compared to its competitors, particularly in tasks like social media usage, camera operation, and web browsing. This higher power draw suggests that the Pulse Pro may be leveraging more powerful hardware or delivering a higher level of performance, which could be advantageous for users who prioritise speed and responsiveness in their phone, even if it means a quicker battery drain. This insight helps readers understand the trade-offs involved in their purchase decision. Another interesting observation is that while the Pulse Pro generally uses more power, the Xiaomi A2 demonstrates more efficient power usage in several key areas, including gaming, media playback, and outgoing calls. This efficiency could make the Xiaomi A2 a more attractive option for users who prioritise battery longevity, especially when extended usage is crucial. The Motorola Moto G34 falls somewhere in between, generally offering more balanced power consumption that aligns closely with the entry-tier average, making it a solid all-around performer. Finally, the average battery consumption for the Entry Tier segment, represented by the green bars, provides a valuable benchmark, showing that all three devices are relatively close in performance to the segment norms. However, the HMD Pulse Pro’s divergence from the average in high-consumption tasks highlights its focus on performance, possibly catering to users who demand more from their smartphones in terms of power and capabilities. In summary, the HMD Pulse Pro stands out for its performance-driven approach, which may appeal to users who need a device that can easily handle intensive tasks, even if it comes at the cost of higher power consumption. Meanwhile, the Xiaomi A2 offers a more battery-efficient alternative suitable for users who value long battery life over peak performance. The Motorola Moto G34 provides a balanced option, making it a reliable choice for those looking to compromise power and efficiency in the entry-tier market. 4.   Battery Efficiency The battery efficiency comparison chart for the HMD Pulse Pro and its competitors reveals several key insights into how well these smartphones manage power relative to their battery capacities. This suggests that the HMD Pulse Pro has a long battery life and uses its power effectively, making it a strong choice for users who need reliable performance over extended periods without significant energy waste. Interestingly, there is no gap in efficiency between the Pulse Pro and other mobile phones like the Motorola Moto G34 and Xiaomi A2 . While all close in efficiency, these mobile phones do not match the Pulse Pro's capability to stretch every bit of power out of its battery. This slight advantage might make the Pulse Pro more appealing to users who are particularly sensitive to battery performance, especially in scenarios where efficient power usage can translate into longer daily usability. The above chart highlights that while the HMD Pulse Pro excels in battery life and efficiency, its competitors remain relatively close in performance. This reinforces Pulse Pro's position as a leader in its segment, particularly for users who demand longevity and efficient power management from their smartphones. 5.   Annual Energy Consumption The annual energy consumption comparison chart for the HMD Pulse Pro and its competitors reveals insightful trends regarding the efficiency and overall energy usage of these entry-tier smartphones. The HMD Pulse Pro, with the lowest annual energy consumption at 2.9 kWh per year, is the most energy-efficient phone among the compared models. This efficiency is a significant advantage for users who are conscious of their device's environmental impact, as it helps reduce their carbon footprint while still enjoying the benefits of a smartphone. In contrast, the other smartphones in the comparison, including the Motorola Moto G34 and Xiaomi A2 , consume slightly more energy annually, at 3.1 and 3.0 kWh, respectively. The Entry Tier average, at 3.2 kWh, further highlights the HMD Pulse Pro's superior efficiency. This suggests that while all these mobile phones are designed to be energy-efficient, the Pulse Pro's optimised power management gives it a tangible edge, potentially making it more appealing to environmentally conscious consumers or those looking for cost savings over the long term. Overall, the HMD Pulse Pro excels in battery life and energy efficiency, consuming less power annually compared to its peers. This efficiency and its strong battery performance reinforce the Pulse Pro's position as a leading choice in the entry-tier market, especially for users who prioritise sustainability and cost-effective energy use. ViserMark VERDICT The HMD Pulse Pro - what's it like to use? The H MD Pulse Pro offers a mixed experience that caters to performance enthusiasts and users who prioritise battery efficiency, making it a versatile option within the Entry Tier smartphone market. One of the most significant aspects of using the HMD Pulse Pro is its battery performance. With an extended battery life of 2 days or 55 hours and energy-efficient consumption, it's designed to last through demanding use without frequent recharging. However, it's important to note that the Pulse Pro consumes more power across various tasks than its competitors. This might appeal to users looking for solid performance, even if it comes at the cost of higher power usage. The phone shows a higher current draw for everyday activities like social media, calling, and web browsing, which could impact battery life depending on usage patterns. Also, the HMD Pulse Pro excels in handling intensive tasks, such as gaming and camera operations, thanks to its powerful hardware. However, this power comes at a cost-a potential decrease in battery life during heavy use. This trade-off is something users should consider based on their daily needs and usage patterns. Beyond performance, the HMD Pulse Pro maintains a user-friendly design with features like a 6.65-inch IPS LCD display and a side-mounted fingerprint sensor. These elements contribute to a comfortable and secure user experience, while the availability of multiple colour options adds a touch of personalization. The device also supports practical features like NFC and USB Type-C, which enhance its usability in everyday scenarios. Overall, the HMD Pulse Pro is a strong choice for users who value both performance and battery life. It's particularly well-suited for those who prioritise power and efficiency in equal measure, and who are willing to accept a bit of extra power consumption for a responsive, capable smartphone experience. Pros Cons Extended battery life without frequent charging. Tends to consume more power across various tasks compared to competitors, potentially impacting battery life during heavy use Handles intensive tasks like gaming and camera usage efficiency. The display resolution is 720x1612 pixels, which might be lower than what some users expect from a modern smartphone. Features a 6.65-inch IPS LCD display with 90Hz refresh rate It lacks any groundbreaking or standout feature that would significantly set it apart from other entry-tier smartphones. Energy efficient making it more cost-effective and environmentally friendly. Performance comes at the cost of increased power usage, which may not suit users who prioritize battery longevity over performance. Priced competitively. For users who engage in lighter smartphone activities, the extra power and performance capabilities might be unnecessary, Who should buy the HMD Pulse Pro? Here are the types of users who might find the HMD Pulse Pro  particularly beneficial: Performance Seekers on a Budget: The Pulse Pro is ideal for users who want strong performance in tasks like gaming and photography without spending a fortune. It delivers high power and responsiveness at an affordable price. Battery-Conscious Users: Perfect for those needing a smartphone with a long battery life, lasting over two days on a single charge, while still capable of handling everyday tasks efficiently. Practical Everyday Users: This is a great choice for individuals looking for a well-rounded, reliable device for daily use. It offers essential features like NFC, a side-mounted fingerprint sensor, and energy-efficient operation. CONCLUSION In summary, the HMD Pulse Pro is best suited for users who seek a balance of performance, battery life, and affordability, making it a versatile choice for a wide range of smartphone users. VCX (Valued Camera eXperience) The VCX Forum  has been working with its members on the system and infrastructure as a non-profit organisation. We strive to improve our technology to develop and exchange accurate and objective quality and performance indicators, which is our ultimate goal. We will also serve as a compass for the smartphone camera industry. We appreciate your interest in the VCX Forum. No VCX reviews are available for this smartphone. Background HMD Globa l, commonly known as HMD, is a Finnish mobile phone manufacturer that was founded in 2016. The company's mission is to revive the iconic Nokia brand, combining its renowned durability and reliability with modern Android technology. This unique approach has led to the creation of devices that offer solid performance, longevity, and affordability, making HMD a standout in the industry. HMD Global quickly gained attention for its commitment to producing smartphones that adhere to a clean, stock Android experience, free from bloatware and unnecessary modifications. This approach has ensured smoother performance and timely updates and appealed to consumers who prefer a more streamlined and user-friendly interface. With a strategic focus on the mid-range and entry-level segments, HMD Global has distinguished itself by offering quality devices at competitive prices. The company's strong emphasis on battery life, durability, and software reliability has carved out a unique niche in the market, appealing to both nostalgic Nokia fans and new users seeking dependable, no-nonsense smartphones. HMD’s products are now available in over 100 countries, and the company has developed a reputation for supporting its devices with regular software updates and security patches, further enhancing the longevity and value of its offerings. HMD continues to grow its presence in the global smartphone market through strategic partnerships and a focus on user trust. Written by Debbie Bouffler is the Marketing and Communications Manager at SmartViser . She is crucial in developing the company's communication and marketing strategies. Debbie has gained extensive experience in strategic business development and marketing in various industries, which has helped her excel in her current position. Debbie is a leader with imagination, an unmatched drive, and an infectious passion for growth and excellence, especially in the telecommunications industry. Our Resources ViserMark Scores ViserMark Reviews Success Stories Latest Articles Discover what ViserMark is all about. Read ViserMark's latest in-depth smartphone battery reviews. Discover our main success stories with Telecoms and other industries. Read more articles on our battery life, performance reviews, and the latest test results. Know more Know more Know more Know more