Samsung Galaxy A17 (4G)
- Marcella Frattari
- 16 minutes ago
- 19 min read
SMARTPHONE TIER: MID TIER
Battery Capacity mAh: 5000
Samsung Galaxy A17: A Budget-Friendly Mid-Tier Option
SMARTPHONE BATTERY PERFORMANCE
Based on Price: Mid Tier (€200-€499)
Mid Tier Ranking #8
Learn more:
Video Review - Soon Available
The Samsung Galaxy A17 is an affordable mid-range smartphone designed to deliver a polished and dependable everyday experience. It stands out in its segment by combining a bright AMOLED display, optical image stabilisation, excellent battery optimisation, and one of the longest software support commitments on the market. Although positioned as a 4G-only device, the A17 succeeds by focusing on refinement, efficiency, and long-term usability rather than headline-grabbing performance metrics or premium-tier features.
Visually, the Galaxy A17 presents a clean and modern aesthetic. Its 6.7-inch Super AMOLED screen offers a Full HD+ resolution of 1080 by 2340 pixels, with a sharp pixel density of roughly 385 ppi. The panel’s 90 Hz refresh rate provides smooth scrolling and responsive interaction, making everyday use pleasantly fluid. While peak brightness tops out at about 800 nits, which places it slightly below some competing models, the AMOLED technology ensures rich contrast, vivid colours, and comfortable visibility in most environments. The display is protected by Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+, elevating durability well beyond what is usually expected in the budget tier, and its IP54 certification offers resistance against dust and splashes.
The device measures 164.4 millimetres in height, 77.9 millimetres in width, and just 7.5 millimetres in thickness, making it slim and lightweight at 190 grams. The front is covered with Victus+ glass, while the back and frame are constructed from plastic, maintaining durability without adding unnecessary weight. Samsung has updated the camera housing with a simplified vertical bump that distinguishes it from previous models such as the A16. The phone is available in Black, Gray, and Light Blue, following the brand's minimalist design language.
Internally, the Galaxy A17 is powered by the MediaTek Helio G99, a 6-nanometre chipset built around a pair of Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.2 GHz and six Cortex-A55 cores at 2.0 GHz. This architecture provides reliable everyday performance for browsing, social media, video streaming, and multitasking, making the device well suited for users with moderate demands. The Mali-G57 MC2 GPU supports casual gaming and smooth multimedia playback, although more graphically intensive titles will require reduced settings. Storage configurations vary across markets and include combinations such as 128 GB with 4 GB, 6 GB, or 8 GB of RAM, as well as 256 GB options paired with either 4 GB or 8 GB of RAM. Storage can be expanded with a microSDXC card of up to two terabytes, although the slot shares space with the second SIM position.
Photography is handled by a practical triple camera system. The main 50-megapixel wide-angle sensor features an f/1.8 aperture, phase detection autofocus, and optical image stabilisation, enabling sharper images and noticeably improved performance in low-light conditions. The secondary cameras include a 5-megapixel ultrawide lens and a 2-megapixel macro unit, which serve as functional but modest additions for wider scenes or close-up shots. Video recording is limited to 1080p at 30 frames per second, which is consistent with other devices in its price class, though the inclusion of OIS helps maintain smoother footage. On the front, a 13-megapixel camera captures clear selfies and can also record video in 1080p.
One of the Galaxy A17’s strongest qualities is its battery performance. Equipped with a 5000 mAh battery and supporting 25-watt wired charging, the device achieves impressive longevity. In EU endurance testing, it reached an excellent runtime of 51 hours and 33 minutes, placing it comfortably among the most efficient devices in its class. The battery is also rated for up to 1200 charge cycles, indicating strong long-term durability. Independent SmartViser testing confirms the A17’s remarkable optimisation, showing that the device excels in scenarios such as gaming, video streaming, camera usage, and general web browsing. These results reflect Samsung’s careful tuning of the Helio G99 platform and demonstrate why the A17 consistently outperforms several competitors, including the Galaxy A26 and the Motorola Moto G56 5G, in real-world efficiency.
Connectivity on the Galaxy A17 focuses on well-implemented essentials. The device supports 4G LTE networks and includes dual-band Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac for reliable wireless performance. Bluetooth 5.3 provides stable peripheral connections, while USB Type-C 2.0 ensures modern wired communication. Location services are comprehensive, with compatibility across GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, and QZSS systems. NFC is available in certain regions, and FM radio may be included depending on the market. The phone does not feature a 3.5 mm headphone jack, aligning it with the design direction of recent Samsung devices. Security is handled by a fast and responsive side-mounted fingerprint sensor, complemented by virtual proximity sensing and other essential motion and orientation sensors.
On the software side, the Galaxy A17 ships with Android 15 and Samsung’s One UI 7 interface. The software experience is intuitive, customisable, and enriched with modern tools such as Circle to Search and Google’s Gemini assistant. What truly sets the device apart, however, is Samsung’s exceptional update policy: the A17 is promised six major Android upgrades, far surpassing typical support windows for this price tier and ensuring that the device remains secure and up-to-date for years to come.
Overall, the Samsung Galaxy A17 presents a thoughtful blend of efficiency, durability, and long-term value. It may not offer 5G connectivity or flagship-level performance, but it excels in areas that matter most to everyday users. Its bright AMOLED display, reliable camera system with OIS, excellent battery longevity, and unmatched software support make it one of the most balanced and future-proof budget smartphones available in 2025. For users seeking a stable, long-lasting device with a refined user experience, the Galaxy A17 is an appealing and highly practical choice.
Pros | Cons |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ViserMark Labels for the Samsung Galaxy A17
Please take a look at the following information about the battery performance of the Samsung Galaxy A17:
Battery Life: The Samsung Galaxy A17 delivers a strong showing in real-world endurance, achieving up to 39 hours of active use, or roughly a day and a half under balanced conditions. This places it slightly ahead of several mid-tier competitors and makes it a reliable option for users who prioritise stability over peak performance. Despite its large 6.7-inch AMOLED screen, the A17 manages to maintain consistent runtime thanks to Samsung’s well-calibrated software and the efficiency of the Helio G99 chipset.
Battery Charging: Charging performance is handled by 25-watt wired charging, which, while adequate, is modest compared to some aggressively fast-charging alternatives in this segment. No charger is included in the box, so users will need to provide their own USB PD-compatible adapter for full-speed charging. In typical conditions, a full charge requires just over an hour and twenty minutes, making it faster than the Galaxy A26 but still behind brands such as Xiaomi and Motorola, which routinely offer 40W to 67W charging speeds at similar price levels. The A17 does not support wireless charging, and its USB-C 2.0 port limits both data transfer rates and charging flexibility. While the charging system is sufficient for overnight replenishment or quick daytime top-ups, it feels conservative in 2025, especially considering that competing devices have pushed charging standards forward in the mid-range category.
Battery Performance & Efficiency: Where the Galaxy A17 truly distinguishes itself is in battery efficiency. SmartViser’s task-based tests reveal that the A17 is one of the most optimised devices in its class, outperforming both the Galaxy A26 and the Motorola Moto G56 5G across numerous real-world scenarios. Annual energy consumption was measured at 4.2 kWh, which is significantly better than the A26’s 4.6 kWh and moderately better than other mid-range competitors. The A17’s efficiency reflects Samsung’s careful tuning of the Helio G99 platform, resulting in smoother battery behaviour under load and more predictable endurance throughout the day. While its endurance is ultimately capped by the standard 5000 mAh battery, the Galaxy A17 compensates with excellent optimisation, making it one of the most battery-efficient LTE devices in its class.
Specification Overview - Released Date: September 2025
Body & Build:
Dimensions: 164.4 x 77.9 x 7.5 mm
Weight: 190g
Materials: Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus+), plastic back, plastic frame
Durability: IP54 – dust protected and resistant to water splashes
Design: Slim and lightweight build with Samsung’s minimalist aesthetic; modernised camera bump and comfortable in hand
Display:
Size: 6.7-inch Super AMOLED
Resolution: 2340 x 1080 (FHD+), ~385 ppi
Refresh Rate: 90Hz
Brightness: ~800 nits peak (measured)
HDR Support: No HDR certification
Protection: Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ (Mohs level 5)
Operating System:
OS: Android 15 with One UI 7
Support: Up to 6 major Android upgrades (Samsung policy as of 2025)
Chipset & Performance:
Global Variant:
Processor: MediaTek Helio G99 (6nm)
CPU: Octa-core (2x Cortex-A76 @ 2.2GHz + 6x Cortex-A55 @ 2.0GHz)
GPU: Mali-G57 MC2
Memory & Storage:
Configurations:
128GB + 4GB RAM
128GB + 6GB RAM
128GB + 8GB RAM
256GB + 4GB RAM
256GB + 8GB RAM
Expandable Storage: microSDXC (shared SIM slot)
Storage Tech: UFS 2.2
Connectivity & Features:
Network: GSM / HSPA / LTE (No 5G support)
SIM: Nano-SIM / Dual Nano-SIM (no eSIM)
Wi-Fi: Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band
Bluetooth: 5.3
NFC: Available (market-dependent)
Radio: FM Radio (market-dependent)
USB-C: USB Type-C 2.0, OTG
Biometrics: Side-mounted fingerprint reader
Other Features: Circle to Search, Gemini integration, virtual proximity sensor, compass, accelerometer
Audio:
Speakers: Single loudspeaker
3.5mm Jack: Not included
Camera System:
Rear Cameras:
50MP main (f/1.8, OIS, PDAF, 1/2.76", 0.64µm)
5MP ultrawide (f/2.2, 120° FoV)
2MP macro
Video: 1080p@30fps
Front Camera: 13MP (f/2.0), 1080p@30fps video recording
Colours Available: Black, Gray, Light Blue.
Performance - HOW WE TEST
ViserMark offers a comprehensive range of battery performance test results based on different criteria and benchmarks for evaluating a smartphone's performance. Our tests are performed using the strictest protocol in a controlled environment to ensure repetition and consistency powered by SmartViser's test automation solution viSer.
VWS Analytics Studio is a complementary product to the viSer Test Automation solution. It enhances the viSer user experience and is the fastest way to analyse and view smartphone test results.
We have used the interactive dashboard to show you the recent test results and translated them into ViserMark Labels.
Join our readers to receive the latest update to our smartphone battery performance scores and performance reviews as soon as we finish testing!
Smartphone Battery Performance - FULL TEST RESULTS AND REVIEW
ViserMark has put the Samsung Galaxy A17 through our testing protocol, based on real smartphone usage from 100% battery level down to power off. This includes daily activities, such as calls, web, video and music streaming, gaming, social networks, picture and video capture, and standby. All activities are executed in a defined order and timeline.
These test results, show how the Samsung Galaxy A17 performed and the scores achieved.
1. Battery Performance
The Samsung Galaxy A17 achieved a battery performance score of 42/100, placing it slightly above the mid-tier average of 44.52/100 and ahead of both the Motorola Moto G56 5G (40) and the Samsung Galaxy A26 (36). While it does not surpass the most efficient devices in the segment, the A17 clearly demonstrates better optimisation than Samsung’s own A26 and maintains stronger overall stamina than several competitors. Its score reflects a balanced battery profile: not class-leading, but reliably stable across most day-to-day scenarios.
Charging is handled through 25W wired charging, though Samsung does not include a charger in the box. Using a certified USB PD charger, the Galaxy A17 reached a full charge in approximately 1 hour and 20 minutes, a notably faster result than the Galaxy A26 but still modest compared to the 40W to 67W charging solutions commonly offered by Chinese manufacturers in the same price bracket. The device does not support wireless or reverse charging, in line with expectations for its pricing tier.
Overall, the Galaxy A17 demonstrates a positive energy-to-performance ratio, particularly under real-world usage conditions. SmartViser workload testing shows that the A17 is significantly more power-efficient than the A26 and often more stable than the Moto G56 5G, consuming less power during gaming, camera use, media playback, and web browsing. Its well-tuned behaviour under load suggests that Samsung’s optimisation of the Helio G99 platform is notably more effective here than on previous models. For everyday users, the Galaxy A17 offers dependable endurance and consistent efficiency, making it one of the stronger battery performers in Samsung’s affordable lineup.
2. Battery Life
In ViserMark’s battery life testing, the Samsung Galaxy A17 delivered 39 hours of active usage, which corresponds to around 1.5 days of typical real-world use. This places it directly in line with the broader mid-tier segment, matching the endurance achieved by both the Motorola Moto G56 5G and its sibling, the Galaxy A26. While not a standout performer, the A17 maintains a dependable level of stamina suitable for most everyday users.
Despite sharing the same 5,000mAh battery capacity as many of its competitors, the A17’s endurance benefits from the relatively efficient MediaTek Helio G99 chipset, which shows better tuning here than in previous Samsung models. However, its overall battery life still falls short of the mid-tier average of 1.8 days, indicating that there is room for improvement in long-term power optimisation when the device is placed under heavier workloads.
Although the A17’s endurance does not exceed that of its competitors, it performs consistently across the workload suite. The Moto G56 5G, powered by a more modern 5G-enabled platform, maintains similar longevity. Meanwhile, the Galaxy A26, despite sharing the same battery capacity, lags slightly behind in efficiency due to higher power consumption and less refined optimisation.
For everyday users, the A17’s 1.5-day longevity is sufficient, provided their routine does not involve extended gaming sessions, frequent camera usage, or continuous mobile data activity. Heavy users may push the battery to its limits sooner, but for the majority, the A17 delivers dependable day-to-day stamina.
The Samsung Galaxy A17 and Galaxy A26 were analysed for battery consumption across a wide range of everyday tasks using SmartViser's viSer and VWS Analytics Studio. The comparison highlighted differences in power usage for activities such as social media, calls, gaming, camera, and web browsing.
During social media use and voice calls, the Galaxy A26 shows a noticeably higher energy drain, indicating that it is less efficient in tasks that involve sustained connectivity and continuous screen interaction. The Galaxy A17, by contrast, handles these activities with much lower power consumption, resulting in a cooler device and slower battery decline during long communication or browsing sessions.
Gaming and data-heavy tasks such as downloading and uploading further highlight the difference in tuning between the two models. The Galaxy A26 consumes considerably more power under these conditions, suggesting that its chipset and software optimisation struggle to maintain efficiency when placed under moderate to high load. The Galaxy A17 performs these same tasks more gracefully, drawing less energy and maintaining smoother performance over longer sessions.
Camera usage also favours the Galaxy A17. While neither device is particularly demanding in this category relative to others, the A26 still draws more power during extended shooting or video recording. The A17’s more efficient management here contributes to a more stable endurance profile, especially for users who use their camera frequently throughout the day.
In media consumption, including YouTube streaming, video replay, and music playback, the Galaxy A26 again demonstrates higher consumption levels. This means that long periods of video viewing or media streaming will deplete its battery more quickly compared to the A17, which remains more balanced and consistent across these tasks.
Web browsing, which mixes display activity with bursts of network usage, also shows the A17 as the more efficient device. The A26 tends to drain faster during extended browsing sessions, making the A17 the better choice for users who spend long stretches reading, scrolling, or navigating web apps.
In summary, while both smartphones deliver similar total battery life when measured in hours or days, the Galaxy A17 achieves this with clearly superior optimisation. It handles nearly all everyday tasks with lower energy consumption, cooler operation, and more predictable endurance. The Galaxy A26, by contrast, displays higher power draw across the board, especially during communication, browsing, and media-intensive activities. For users who value consistent efficiency and the longest possible runtime between charges, the Galaxy A17 is the more effective and well-balanced device.
When comparing the Samsung Galaxy A17 with the Motorola Moto G56 5G across SmartViser’s battery consumption tests, the differences in optimisation become immediately clear. Although both devices occupy the same mid-tier category, their behaviour under everyday workloads reflects two distinct energy-management approaches.
In light social media use, the Moto G56 5G has a slight edge. It draws a bit less power while scrolling through feeds and interacting with apps, which can give it a small advantage for users who mainly live inside social platforms.
Everywhere else, however, the balance shifts clearly in favour of the Galaxy A17. During voice calls, the A17 consumes less energy, making it better suited to users who spend a lot of time on the phone. The difference becomes more pronounced in heavier workloads like gaming and large downloads or uploads, where the Motorola drains its battery faster, while the A17 manages to keep its consumption under tighter control.
The gap is especially large when using the camera. Capturing photos or recording video puts a much heavier strain on the Moto G56 5G, whereas the Galaxy A17 remains comparatively frugal, making it a safer choice for people who shoot a lot of content. The same trend appears in YouTube streaming, video replay and general media playback: long viewing sessions eat through the battery more quickly on Motorola’s device, while Samsung’s phone stretches each charge further.
Web browsing rounds out the picture. Over extended surfing sessions, the A17 again proves more efficient, maintaining a lower and steadier power draw than the Moto G56 5G.
In short, the Moto G56 5G only wins on social media efficiency, but the Galaxy A17 is clearly better optimised for almost everything else: calls, gaming, data transfers, camera use, streaming and browsing. For users with mixed or media-heavy usage patterns, the A17 offers a more balanced and battery-friendly experience, while the Moto G56 5G mostly benefits those whose primary focus is social apps.
When comparing the battery behaviour of the Samsung Galaxy A17, Galaxy A26 and Motorola Moto G56 5G using SmartViser’s viSer testing, it becomes clear that each phone approaches power management very differently, and these differences heavily influence real-world endurance.
The Samsung Galaxy A17 stands out as the most balanced and consistently efficient performer across everyday tasks. It handles social media, calls, gaming, browsing and streaming with noticeably lower battery drain than the other two models, making it the most stable option for users with mixed or continuous usage patterns. Its biggest strength is its ability to keep consumption moderate even during heavier activities such as gaming, camera use and large data transfers, where both the Galaxy A26 and the Moto G56 5G lose efficiency more quickly.
The Motorola Moto G56 5G performs closest to the A17 but only in a few lighter scenarios. It manages social media with slightly better efficiency than Samsung’s A17, but this advantage disappears the moment workloads increase. Once calls become extended, games become more demanding, or media playback continues for long sessions, the Moto G56 5G begins to draw substantially more power. Camera usage especially exposes its weaknesses, as it consumes far more energy than both Samsung devices during photo or video capture. The heavier drain across key tasks suggests that Motorola’s performance-oriented approach strains the battery more than expected for a mid-tier phone.
The Samsung Galaxy A26, meanwhile, sits at the opposite end of the spectrum. It consistently consumes the most power across nearly all active tasks, social media, calling, gaming, downloads, camera use, streaming, replay workloads and web browsing. This makes it the least efficient during real-world use. The A26’s battery endurance ultimately relies more on Samsung’s strong standby optimisation rather than active-use efficiency, which is why it can still deliver acceptable battery life for light or passive users despite its higher drain when the screen is on.
Compared to the broader mid-tier average, the A17 performs better than typical phones in nearly every active task, the Moto G56 5G aligns more closely with the average but tends to spike during heavier workloads, and the A26 exceeds the average consumption in almost all categories.
In ViserMark’s battery efficiency evaluation, the Samsung Galaxy A17 earned a 1-leaf rating, placing it comfortably above both the Motorola Moto G56 5G and the Samsung Galaxy A26, which each score only half a leaf. Although the A17 does not reach the efficiency levels of the mid-tier average, it still demonstrates notably better optimisation than its two direct competitors in this group.
This stronger efficiency profile stems from the way the A17 handles real-world workloads. While not perfect, the device shows comparatively restrained energy consumption across most active use scenarios. Tasks such as social media browsing, calls, and streaming see more moderate power draw on the A17 than on the Moto G56 5G or Galaxy A26, both of which tend to drain their batteries more aggressively during screen-on or connectivity-heavy activity. This more controlled approach allows the A17 to maintain steadier performance throughout the day without the rapid dips seen on its rivals.
The A17’s 1-leaf rating reflects the fact that while it is not the most efficient mid-tier smartphone available, it is clearly better optimised than these two competitors. It balances power and performance more effectively, providing a smoother and more predictable endurance profile.
In summary, the Samsung Galaxy A17 stands as the more energy-conscious option in this three-way comparison. It still leaves room for improvement relative to the broader market, but for users seeking a mid-range device with more controlled power usage and fewer unexpected drops in battery level, the A17 outperforms both the Moto G56 5G and the Galaxy A26 in overall efficiency.
According to ViserMark’s annual energy consumption testing, the Samsung Galaxy A17 records an estimated usage of 4.2 kWh per year, positioning it slightly below the Motorola Moto G56 5G and clearly ahead of the Samsung Galaxy A26, both of which consume more energy over the same period. While the A17 does not reach the efficiency of the broader mid-tier average, it still reflects a better-tuned balance than its two closest competitors.
The Moto G56 5G sits just above the A17, consuming marginally more energy on a yearly basis. This aligns with its higher drain across several active use cases, including gaming, video streaming, and camera operation. The Galaxy A26, meanwhile, stands as the least efficient device among the three, requiring noticeably more energy throughout the year due to its consistently higher draw during nearly all day-to-day tasks.
Despite not being a class-leading performer, the Galaxy A17 distinguishes itself by offering a more restrained consumption pattern that benefits long-term sustainability and operational cost. Its annual energy use remains moderate, especially considering its large battery capacity and mid-range hardware, making it a more eco-conscious option within this comparison set.
Who Should Buy the Samsung Galaxy A17?
The Samsung Galaxy A17 is an excellent choice for users who want a practical, well-balanced smartphone that focuses on efficiency, longevity and everyday reliability rather than raw performance. It is particularly well-suited for people who value smooth day-to-day use, low energy consumption and a modern design, all without stretching their budget.
With its Super AMOLED display, Gorilla Glass Victus+ protection and lightweight build, the A17 appeals to users who prefer a device that feels refined and comfortable in hand, yet remains durable enough for daily wear. Its IP54 rating is not as robust as the A26’s IP67 certification, but still provides reassuring resistance against dust and splashes. Combined with Samsung’s industry-leading software support, up to six major Android upgrades, the A17 is a strong match for anyone planning to keep their phone for several years.
The A17 shines in battery efficiency, making it especially attractive for users with steady, moderate usage habits. Those who spend most of their time browsing, messaging, calling, or using social apps will appreciate its more controlled power consumption compared to competitors like the Galaxy A26 and the Moto G56 5G. Its stability in light-to-medium workloads makes it a dependable partner for students, casual users and professionals who value continuity over bursts of performance.
However, the Galaxy A17 is not designed for heavy multitaskers, gamers or users who rely on intensive camera sessions. Its Helio G99 chipset is efficient but not performance-oriented, and while the device handles everyday tasks comfortably, it will not satisfy those who frequently engage in high-demand applications. The absence of 5G connectivity also makes it less suitable for users who prioritise the fastest network speeds or plan to keep their device well into a fully 5G-centric future.
Charging remains limited to 25W, without a charger included, which may feel slow by 2025 standards, especially for users accustomed to faster charging technologies from other brands.
Ultimately, the Samsung Galaxy A17 is ideal for practical users who prioritise stability, efficiency and long-term value, wrapped in a modern Samsung experience. It doesn’t try to impress with flashy performance metrics, instead, it delivers a thoughtful, energy-conscious smartphone that quietly excels at the tasks most people do every single day.
ViserMark VERDICT
The Samsung Galaxy A17 - what's it like to use?
Using the Galaxy A17 feels like stepping into a well-balanced, thoughtfully tuned mid-range experience, one that prioritises efficiency, comfort and reliability over headline-grabbing specs. Everyday activities such as browsing, messaging, social media and video streaming run smoothly, particularly on the 6GB and 8GB RAM configurations, where One UI 7 feels fluid and responsive. Samsung’s software remains a strong point: clean, intuitive, and packed with subtle conveniences like Circle to Search and smart gestures that enhance usability without becoming intrusive.
The 6.7-inch Super AMOLED panel contributes significantly to the A17’s pleasant day-to-day experience. Colours are vivid, contrast is rich, and despite the 90Hz refresh rate being more modest than the 120Hz screens found on pricier models, scrolling still feels natural and snappy. Brightness is adequate for most environments, though it may struggle slightly under harsh sunlight. The side-mounted fingerprint sensor is consistent and fast, making unlocking the device effortless.
Where the Galaxy A17 stands out most is in its efficiency. The Helio G99 chipset may not be a performance powerhouse, but its strength lies in delivering stable, predictable behaviour with low energy draw. For the majority of tasks people perform daily, the phone remains cool, controlled and impressively frugal.
Of course, the limitations become more visible when the A17 is pushed harder. Demanding games, complex multitasking or prolonged GPS sessions can expose its processing ceilings, leading to occasional slowdowns. Without 5G support, users who rely heavily on the fastest mobile data speeds may also feel constrained. Charging remains capped at 25W, acceptable for casual top-ups but slow for anyone used to faster charging technologies, especially since no charger is included.
Despite these constraints, the Galaxy A17 proves to be a dependable and easygoing daily companion. Its sleek build, efficient software optimisation, and long-term update support make it a device that fits naturally into everyday life. It may not aim to impress power users, but for those who prioritise comfort, stability and battery-friendly performance, the A17 offers a reassuringly smooth and enjoyable experience.
VCX (Valued Camera eXperience)
The VCX Forum has been working with its members on the system and infrastructure as a non-profit organisation. We strive to improve our technology to develop and exchange accurate and objective quality and performance indicators, which is our ultimate goal. We will also serve as a compass for the smartphone camera industry. We appreciate your interest in the VCX Forum.
VCX Forum: No review
Background
The Samsung Group is a South Korean multinational conglomerate headquartered in Samsung Town, Seoul. It comprises numerous affiliated businesses, most united under the Samsung brand. Samsung Electronics has assembly plants and sales networks in 74 countries and employs around 290,000 people. Samsung is a major manufacturer of electronic components such as lithium-ion batteries, semiconductors, image sensors, camera modules and displays for clients such as Apple, Sony, HTC and Nokia.
Written by
Marcella Frattari is the Communication Marketing and Lead Generation Manager at SmartViser, playing a key role in shaping the company's communication and marketing strategies. With a background in journalism and a passion for digital communication, Marcella focuses on improving SmartViser's overall online presence and engagement. Her dedication to clear, effective communication and creative content makes her a valuable asset to the team.
Press Contact
Marcella Frattari: Contact@visermark.com
Our Resources
ViserMark Scores | ViserMark Reviews | Success Stories | Latest Articles |
Discover what ViserMark is all about. | Read ViserMark's latest in-depth smartphone battery reviews. | Discover our main success stories with Telecoms and other industries. | Read more articles on our battery life, performance reviews, and test results. |
Comments