Motorola Moto G56 5G
- Marcella Frattari
- Sep 29
- 14 min read
Updated: Oct 28
SMARTPHONE TIER: MID TIER
Battery Capacity mAh: 5200
Motorola Moto G56 5G: A Rugged Mid-Range Phone With Big Battery Power
SMARTPHONE BATTERY PERFORMANCE
Based on Price: Mid Tier (€200-€499)
Mid Tier Ranking #11
Learn more:
Video Review - Soon Available
The Motorola Moto G56 5G is another addition to the brand’s sprawling mid-range line-up, positioned as a practical choice for those who want reliable performance, a long-lasting battery, and a few thoughtful extras without paying premium prices. It doesn’t aim to reinvent the wheel or dazzle with cutting-edge hardware. Instead, it quietly leans on Motorola’s proven formula. Clean software, decent specifications, and small quality-of-life features that still matter to a lot of people.
Motorola has never been about flashy designs, and the Moto G56 follows suit. The rear panel has a textured matte finish that resists fingerprints and provides good grip, while the dual-camera module is tidy and unobtrusive. At around 200 grams and 8.35 mm thick, it’s on the heavier side, but still ergonomic enough to handle comfortably.
Durability is where the G56 really shines. With IP68 rating, it offers stronger water and dust resistance than most phones in this price bracket. Add Corning Gorilla Glass 7i protection on the display and compliance with MIL-STD-810H tests, and it’s clearly built to withstand everyday knocks, splashes, and even harsher conditions. Colour choices are restrained and practical, in darker and muted tones, but the overall build is sturdier than many glossy competitors.
The phone carries a 6.72-inch Full HD+ LCD panel with a 120Hz refresh rate. It’s not OLED, so it lacks the deeper blacks and contrast of some rivals, but brightness is sufficient for outdoor use and colour reproduction is balanced, if slightly muted. Scrolling and animations feel smooth thanks to the high refresh rate, and for casual browsing or streaming, the display does the job well.
Under the hood, the G56 runs on MediaTek’s Dimensity 7060 chipset, paired with up to 8GB of RAM and 128GB of storage (expandable via microSD in many markets). Everyday tasks are handled smoothly. Even light gaming runs fine at modest settings, though more demanding titles will show the phone’s limits. Reviewers have noted some occasional lag when multitasking or switching camera modes, but thermal management is solid, the phone doesn’t overheat easily under sustained use.
Motorola’s software experience remains one of its biggest strengths. Running Android 15 with My UX, the interface feels clean, fast, and bloat-free. Handy gestures like the double twist to launch the camera or the chop motion to turn on the flashlight are still present, giving the G56 a bit of Motorola’s trademark convenience.
The biggest downside is software longevity. Motorola promises two major Android updates and four years of security patches. That’s decent for a budget-friendly phone but well behind Samsung and Google, which now guarantee at least five years. If you keep your phone for a long time, this limitation is worth factoring in.
On the camera side, the Moto G56 offers a 50 MP main sensor supported by an 8 MP ultrawide lens. In practice, daylight shots are sharp with decent dynamic range, though low-light performance is weaker due to the lack of optical image stabilisation (OIS). Video recording is capped at 1080p, putting it behind some rivals that now offer 4K at this tier. The 32 MP selfie camera is solid in good lighting but struggles in dim conditions. Overall, the setup is competent but far from standout, perfectly fine for casual users, but not for creators.
One of the G56’s strongest points is its 5,200 mAh battery, which easily lasts a full day of heavy use and often stretches into a second day with lighter usage. Charging is handled by 30W wired TurboPower, which is adequate but slower than the 50W–65W speeds some rivals now bring to the mid-tier. There’s no wireless charging, but that’s par for the course at this price.
Audio is another small strength. Stereo speakers with Dolby Atmos provide loud and reasonably balanced sound. Traditionalists will also appreciate the continued presence of a 3.5mm headphone jack and microSD card slot, both rare in 2025’s mid-range market. Connectivity includes 5G, NFC, Wi-Fi ac, and Bluetooth 5.3, covering all the essentials.
Pros | Cons |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
ViserMark Labels for the Motorola Moto G56 5G
Please take a look at the following information about the battery performance of the Motorola Moto G56 5G :
Battery Life: The Motorola Moto G56 5G delivers endurance that is solid, if not class-leading. In testing, it managed around 39 hours of active use, translating to roughly a day and a half of real-world usage for most people. The sizeable 5,200mAh cell provides headroom for heavy scrolling, video playback, and light gaming without forcing a mid-day top-up. Compared to Samsung’s Galaxy A26, the G56 lasts longer under mixed loads, but it lags behind both the mid-tier average and the standout Nothing CMF Phone 2 Pro. While it won’t stretch comfortably into two full days, its stamina is still more than adequate for anyone who charges nightly.
Battery Charging: Motorola equips the G56 with 30W wired charging, which feels modest in 2025’s mid-range market. A full charge takes around 1 hour 47 minutes, with a 50% boost achieved in just under 40 minutes using the supplied charger. There’s no wireless charging support, which is not unusual at this price, but worth flagging for anyone eyeing premium convenience. In short, the charging speed is functional rather than competitive, suited more to overnight top-ups than quick pit stops.
Battery Performance & Efficiency: Independent measurements show the Moto G56 5G consuming about 4.3 kWh annually, which is less efficient than the mid-tier average (3.6 kWh) and notably behind the Nothing CMF Phone 2 Pro (2.9 kWh). Its efficiency rating of 0.5 “leaves” highlights a clear gap in optimisation, placing it alongside the Galaxy A26 rather than more refined rivals. In day-to-day use, this means the G56 handles casual tasks predictably well, but under heavier loads, drain levels spike more quickly than competitors. For users who value sheer endurance over cutting-edge efficiency, the Moto G56 is a dependable if unspectacular performer.
Specification Overview - Released Date: May 2025
Body & Build:
Dimensions: 165.8 × 76.3 × 8.4 mm
Weight: 200 g
Materials: Glass front (Gorilla Glass 7i), plastic frame, silicone polymer (eco leather) back
Durability: IP68 / IP69 dust-tight and water resistant (up to 1.5 m for 30 minutes, high-pressure water jets)
Display:
Size: 6.72 inches
Resolution: 1080 × 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~392 ppi)
Refresh Rate: 120 Hz
Brightness: ~1000 nits typical / “High Brightness Mode” for outdoor use
Protection: Corning Gorilla Glass 7i, Mohs hardness level 6
Operating System:
OS: Android 15 with Motorola My UX customisations
Chipset & Performance:
Processor: MediaTek Dimensity 7060 (6 nm)
CPU: Octa-core (2×2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 + 6×2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU: IMG BXM-8-256
Memory & Storage:
Configurations: 128 GB + 4 GB RAM / 128 GB + 8 GB RAM/ 256 GB + 8 GB RAM / 256 GB + 12 GB RAM / 512 GB + 12 GB RAM
Expandable: microSDXC (shared SIM slot)
Connectivity & Features:
SIM: Single Nano-SIM, Dual Nano-SIM, Nano-SIM + eSIM
5G: Supported (Sub-6 GHz)
Wi-Fi: Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band
Bluetooth: 5.3, A2DP, LE
NFC: Yes (region dependent)
USB: USB Type-C 2.0
Biometrics: Side-mounted fingerprint sensor
Sensors: Accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Audio:
Speakers: Stereo speakers with Dolby Atmos
Headphone Jack: 3.5 mm present
Camera System:
Rear Cameras: 50 MP (f/1.8, 25mm wide, 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF) / 8 MP (f/2.2, 12mm ultrawide, 118˚ FOV, 1.12µm)
Rear Features: LED flash, HDR, panorama
Rear Video: 1080p@30/60fps
Front Camera: 32 MP (f/2.2, wide, 0.7µm) HDR
Video Recording:
Yes (1080p)
Colours Available: Pantone Black Oyster, Pantone Gray Mist, Pantone Dazzling Blue, Pantone Dill
Performance - HOW WE TEST
ViserMark offers a comprehensive range of battery performance test results based on different criteria and benchmarks for evaluating a smartphone's performance. Our tests are performed using the strictest protocol in a controlled environment to ensure repetition and consistency powered by SmartViser's test automation solution viSer.
VWS Analytics Studio is a complementary product to the viSer Test Automation solution. It enhances the viSer user experience and is the fastest way to analyse and view smartphone test results.
We have used the interactive dashboard to show you the recent test results and translated them into ViserMark Labels.
Join our readers to receive the latest update to our smartphone battery performance scores and performance reviews as soon as we finish testing!
Smartphone Battery Performance - FULL TEST RESULTS AND REVIEW
ViserMark has put the Motorola Moto G56 5G through our testing protocol, based on real smartphone usage from 100% battery level down to power off. This includes daily activities, such as calls, web, video and music streaming, gaming, social networks, picture and video capture, and standby. All activities are executed in a defined order and timeline.
These test results, show how the Motorola Moto G56 5G performed and the scores achieved.
1. Battery Performance
The Motorola Moto G56 5G achieved a battery performance score of 40/100, placing it just above the Samsung Galaxy A26 (36) but below both the mid-tier average of 44.52 and standout rivals such as the Nothing CMF Phone 2 Pro (50). While its result underscores decent endurance, it also highlights the phone’s weaker efficiency compared to the best mid-range devices.
Charging is managed through 30W wired TurboPower (USB PD 3.0). Motorola advertises quick top-ups that provide “hours of use in minutes,” but a full refill still takes around 1 hour 47 minutes in testing. This makes it adequate for overnight charging but slower than many similarly priced rivals, and there is no support for wireless or reverse charging, which keeps it firmly in mid-range territory.
Overall, the Moto G56 5G offers reliable stamina with respectable charging speed. It’s a phone that can be trusted to get you through a busy day without stress, yet it lacks the energy optimisation and endurance polish that define the most efficient mid-range handsets of 2025.
2. Battery Life
In ViserMark’s battery life testing, the Motorola Moto G56 5G achieved 39 hours of active usage, which translates to around 1.5 days of typical use. This positions it slightly ahead of the Samsung Galaxy A26 (35 hours) but below the mid-tier average of 46 hours, and well short of the Nothing CMF Phone 2 Pro (55 hours). The result highlights the G56’s dependability for day-and-a-half endurance, but also underlines the efficiency gap compared to the best-optimised mid-range devices.
The phone’s stamina comes courtesy of its 5,200mAh cell and MediaTek Dimensity 7060 chipset, which handle lighter tasks with ease, but see steeper drain under camera or calls than rivals like the CMF Phone 2 Pro. While not poor by any stretch, the G56 lacks the energy refinement that pushes other devices into the two-day club.
For most users, the Moto G56 5G provides peace of mind across a full day with buffer into the next, and comfortably outpaces Samsung’s A26. However, if efficiency and long-haul endurance are priorities, the CMF Phone 2 Pro and even the category average remain more appealing benchmarks.
The Motorola Moto G56 5G generally demonstrates lower power consumption than the Samsung Galaxy A26 in most everyday categories, including social media, outgoing calls, gaming, downloads/uploads, YouTube playback, and web browsing. This suggests the G56 is better optimised for sustained communication, connectivity, and general screen-on tasks, where the A26 tends to draw far more heavily on its battery.
The balance shifts in camera use, where the Galaxy A26 proves more efficient. Meanwhile, in media playback, the two devices are almost identical, with no meaningful difference likely to be noticed in real-world use.
Despite both devices carrying large batteries (5,200 mAh for the Moto G56 vs 5,000 mAh for the Galaxy A26), the Moto G56 5G ultimately delivers longer overall stamina in ViserMark’s testing. This reflects stronger system-level optimisation on Motorola’s part, whereas the Galaxy A26’s higher current draw across most categories undermines its endurance.
When comparing the Motorola Moto G56 5G with the Nothing CMF Phone 2 Pro, the data highlights two mid-tier devices with similar large batteries (5,200 mAh for the G56 vs 5,000 mAh for the CMF) but noticeably different efficiency profiles.
The Moto G56 5G proves more frugal in several everyday categories, including social media and downloads/uploads, where its lower current draw suggests stronger optimisation for online-heavy use. For users who spend much of their time scrolling or messaging, the G56 offers an efficiency edge.
By contrast, the CMF Phone 2 Pro dominates in the majority of demanding workloads, particularly outgoing calls, gaming, camera use, YouTube playback, and media consumption, where the G56 consumes more power. Even in web browsing, the CMF holds a slight advantage, highlighting its broader optimisation for sustained screen-on tasks.
Overall, the Moto G56 5G is the better pick for light social and network activity, but the CMF Phone 2 Pro pulls ahead in both multimedia and performance-heavy scenarios. The trade-off is clear: Motorola prioritises endurance in lighter use, while Nothing’s CMF device is tuned for efficiency under load.
When comparing battery efficiency across the Motorola Moto G56 5G, Samsung Galaxy A26, Nothing CMF Phone 2 Pro, and the mid-tier average, clear differences emerge in how each device manages real-world power demands.
The Moto G56 5G demonstrates a balanced profile overall. It draws slightly more power than the average in outgoing calls and camera use, but proves competitive in social media, downloads/uploads, and web browsing. Its efficiency in media playback and Youtube is also close to the segment benchmark, showing Motorola’s tuning focuses on steady all-round performance.
The Samsung Galaxy A26, by contrast, is the most power-hungry of the three. It consumes significantly more current across nearly every category, especially in social media, outgoing calls, and web browsing. Even with a similar battery size (~5,000 mAh), this high draw undermines its stamina, explaining why it lags behind in real-world endurance testing.
The Nothing CMF Phone 2 Pro stands out for its strong efficiency in gaming (-406 mA), YouTube (-427 mA), and media playback (-300 mA), making it well-suited for users who spend time on entertainment-heavy workloads. However, it pulls more current than average in downloads/uploads and also sits behind the G56 in calling, suggesting its optimisation prioritises multimedia rather than communication-heavy tasks.
In short, the CMF Phone 2 Pro comes across as the most balanced of the three, optimised for consistent performance across varied usage. The Moto G56 5G delivers steady efficiency but leans slightly heavier on communication and camera tasks, while the Galaxy A26 struggles with high drain nearly everywhere.
In ViserMark’s battery efficiency evaluation, the Motorola Moto G56 5G achieved a modest 0.5-leaf rating, placing it behind both the Nothing CMF Phone 2 Pro (1.5 leaves) and the mid-tier average of 1.09 leaves. This shows that, while the G56 maintains competitive battery life thanks to its large 5,200 mAh cell, it isn’t among the most finely optimised devices in its category.
The score reflects a tuning profile that prioritises steady all-round performance rather than squeezing maximum efficiency out of every workload. While Motorola avoids the excessive peaks seen in the Samsung Galaxy A26, its optimisation doesn’t reach the same level of refinement as the CMF Phone 2 Pro.
According to ViserMark’s annual energy testing, the Motorola Moto G56 5G consumes around 4.3 kWh per year, placing it above the mid-tier average of 3.59 kWh and significantly less efficient than the Nothing CMF Phone 2 Pro (2.9 kWh). Only the Samsung Galaxy A26 fares worse, drawing 4.6 kWh annually, making it the least efficient of the group.
This result highlights the G56’s reliance on its large 5,200 mAh battery to deliver competitive endurance rather than on underlying hardware–software efficiency. While Motorola manages to avoid the excessive drain of the Galaxy A26, its energy use still positions it closer to the higher end of the consumption scale.
For everyday users, this means the G56 5G remains a dependable performer in real-world stamina but does so with a heavier annual energy footprint. In sustainability terms, it trails behind the CMF Phone 2 Pro, which balances endurance with far lower long-term consumption.
Who Should Buy the Motorola Moto G56 5G ?
The Motorola Moto G56 5G is best suited for users who want a practical mid-range smartphone that prioritises durability, long-lasting battery life, and everyday usability over flashy extras. It doesn’t try to compete with premium rivals on cutting-edge features but instead delivers steady, reliable performance for those who simply want a phone that gets the job done.
With its IP68 water and dust resistance, MIL-STD-810H compliance, and Corning Gorilla Glass 7i protection, the G56 stands out as one of the most rugged mid-rangers in its price range. Paired with a large 5,200 mAh battery, it comfortably lasts a day and a half for most people, making it a great fit for commuters, outdoor workers, or anyone who values endurance and toughness in a phone.
Its 6.72-inch LCD with 120Hz refresh rate ensures smooth scrolling and solid visibility outdoors, even if it lacks the vibrancy of AMOLED competitors. Combined with clean Android 15 software, Motorola’s helpful gestures, and expandable storage plus a 3.5mm headphone jack, the G56 is ideal for students, families, and traditionalists who appreciate functionality and convenience over flashy design.
That said, it’s not for everyone. The basic dual-camera system is fine for casual photography but lags behind rivals that now offer 4K video or OIS for low light. Similarly, gaming performance is limited, and the software support window (two OS updates, four years of patches) is shorter than what Samsung or Google now provide.
In short, the Moto G56 5G is a dependable mid-range option for practical users, those who want rugged durability, strong everyday stamina, clean software, and legacy features like the headphone jack and microSD slot. It’s less suited to power users, gamers, or aspiring content creators, but for no-nonsense reliability at an affordable price, it makes a strong case.
ViserMark VERDICT
The Motorola Moto G56 5G doesn’t try to steal headlines, but it delivers what matters: durability, dependable battery, and a no-nonsense experience. Where many mid-rangers cut corners, the G56 preserves useful basics—expandable storage, headphone jack—while reinforcing the shell with IP68 and MIL-STD durability.
Its 6.72-inch 120Hz LCD won’t match the contrast of OLEDs, but it’s sufficiently bright for outdoor use and smooth in everyday use. Combined with Android 15 + My UX, the interface stays lean, responsive, and pleasantly free of bloat.
Performance is solid for daily tasks, social media, browsing, messaging all feel smooth. But the G56 isn’t built for extremes; demanding 3D games or heavy multitasking expose its limits. The camera setup is straightforward: the 50 MP main + 8 MP ultrawide, with a 32 MP front, is serviceable in good light, though low-light and video capabilities are modest by current standards.
The Moto G56 5G is not the flashiest mid-ranger, but it’s one of the more reliable ones. It’s built for users who want a phone that just works—durably, predictably, and without frills—so long as your expectations don’t include top-tier cameras or update guarantees.
VCX (Valued Camera eXperience)
The VCX Forum has been working with its members on the system and infrastructure as a non-profit organisation. We strive to improve our technology to develop and exchange accurate and objective quality and performance indicators, which is our ultimate goal. We will also serve as a compass for the smartphone camera industry. We appreciate your interest in the VCX Forum.
VCX Forum: No review
Background
Motorola is a well-established and innovative technology company known for its contributions to the telecommunications industry. Founded in 1928, Motorola has a rich history of pioneering achievements, including the development of the first handheld mobile phone. Today, the company continues to produce a wide range of consumer electronics, with a focus on smartphones that offer reliable performance, innovative features, and value for money. Motorola's smartphones are known for their durability, user-friendly interfaces, and strong battery life, making them a popular choice for consumers worldwide.
Written by
Marcella Frattari is the Communication Marketing and Lead Generation Manager at SmartViser, playing a key role in shaping the company's communication and marketing strategies. With a background in journalism and a passion for digital communication, Marcella focuses on improving SmartViser's overall online presence and engagement. Her dedication to clear, effective communication and creative content makes her a valuable asset to the team.
Press Contact
Marcella Frattari: Contact@visermark.com
Our Resources
ViserMark Scores | ViserMark Reviews | Success Stories | Latest Articles |
Discover what ViserMark is all about. | Read ViserMark's latest in-depth smartphone battery reviews. | Discover our main success stories with Telecoms and other industries. | Read more articles on our battery life, performance reviews, and test results. |