SMARTPHONE TIER: HIGH TIER Battery Capacity mAh: 4492 Google Pixel 8a Smartphone Review: Efficiency and Excellence Combined Smartphone Battery Performance Based on Price: High Tier (€500-€699) Ranking #2 Video Review What do you need to know about the Google Pixel 8a? Quick Summary The Google Pixel 8a is a standout High Tier (€500-€699) smartphone, offering exceptional value with its robust features and impressive performance. It boasts a vibrant 6.1-inch OLED display with a 120Hz refresh rate, ensuring smooth scrolling and vivid visuals. Powered by Google's custom Tensor G3 chip and 8GB of RAM, the Pixel 8a delivers reliable performance for everyday tasks and multitasking. With 128GB/256GB of internal storage, users have ample space for their apps and media, though there's no option for expandable storage. One of the Pixel 8a's highlights is its camera system, featuring a 64MP primary wide camera and a 13MP ultra-wide camera coupled with Google's renowned AI image processing capabilities. Thanks to Night Sight mode, this setup produces stunning photos with excellent dynamic range and detail, even in low-light conditions. The front-facing 13MP camera also delivers high-quality selfies, making it a solid choice for photography enthusiasts. Battery life is a strong suit of the Pixel 8a, with its 4,492mAh battery comfortably lasting 2 full days of use or 48 hours. The Google Pixel 8a supports 18-watt wired charging and 7.5W Qi wireless charging ensuring quick top-ups when needed, a feature that enhances its convenience. Running on the latest version of Android, the Pixel 8a provides a clean, bloatware-free experience with timely updates and security patches, guaranteed for 7 years. With its high-quality display, excellent camera performance, and long-lasting battery, the Google Pixel 8a is an attractive option for those seeking a reliable, feature-rich smartphone at an affordable price. Specification Overview - Released Date: May 2024 Body: 152.1 x 72.7 x 8.49mm. Weight 188g. Display: 6.1 inches OLED, HDR, with 1080 x 2440 pixels resolution, 120Hz rate Protection: Corning Gorilla Glass 3 and P67 dust/water resistant Operating System: Android 14 Chipset: Google Tensor G3 (4 nm). Nona-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X3 & 4x2.45 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.15 GHz Cortex-A510) Memory: 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM - no card slot. Nano-SIM and eSIM Connectivity: Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual/tri-band (market/region dependent). NFC: Yes. Radio No. Loudspeaker: Yes. 3.5mm Jack: No. Rear Camera: Main: 64 MP, f/1.9 (wide). 13 MP, f/2.2 (ultrawide).Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Ultra HDR, panorama, Best Take Front Camera: 13 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide) Video: Front camera: 1080p@30fps, Rear camera: 1080p@30/60/120/240fps Battery: 4492 mAh, 18-watt wired charging and 7.5W Qi wireless charging Colour: Obsidian, Porcelain, Bay, Aloe Pricing Google Pixel 8a These prices are the best from our Affiliate Partners. As an Amazon Associate, we may earn commissions from qualifying purchases from Amazon.com. You can learn more about our disclosure policy here. Smartphone Battery Performance - FULL REVIEW ViserMark offers a comprehensive range of battery performance test results based on different criteria and benchmarks for evaluating a smartphone's performance. Our tests are performed using the strictest protocol in a controlled environment to ensure repetition and consistency powered by SmartViser's test automation solution viSer. VWS Analytics Studio is a complementary product to the viSer Test Automation solution and provides an enhanced viSer user experience. It is the fastest way to analyse and view smartphone test results. We have used the interactive dashboard to show you the recent test results for the Google Pixel 8a and comparative smartphones. Google Pixel 8a ViserMark Labels ViserMark's Battery Performance review is based on the smartphone battery performance results obtained during testing. The ViserMark labels provide valuable insights into the Google Pixel 8a battery performance. Reading this review, you can find a full breakdown of our battery performance results in these sections. Battery Performance Score Battery Life Battery Consumption Battery Efficiency Annual Energy Consumption Also of Interest: ViserMark Labels 1. Battery Performance What is the Google Pixel 8a Performance Score? Battery performance is the key to a smartphone's endurance and efficiency. A good battery performance, like 45/100 for the Google Pixel 8a, ensures that it can handle extensive usage without frequent recharges, providing you with the reliability and convenience you need. The Google Pixel 8a achieved a ViserMark Battery Performance score of 45 out of 100. How does the Google Pixel 8a compare to High Tier smartphones? The Google Pixel 8a's Battery Performance Score of 45 is a testament to its superior power management and efficiency. Its balanced consumption across various activities, such as social media, gaming, and web browsing, showcases its optimised performance, ensuring users can rely on their phones throughout the day without frequent recharges. When directly compared to the Google Pixel 7 and the Samsung Galaxy S23 FE, the Google Pixel 8a's battery life and efficiency becomes evident. The Google Pixel 7, with its 4,355mAh battery, had a lower Battery Performance Score of 34. In contrast, the Pixel 8a, with its 4,492mAh battery, provides a noticeable improvement in Battery Performance Score. Similarly, the Samsung Galaxy S23 FE, despite having a slightly larger 4,500mAh battery, delivers a Battery Performance Score of 36, making the Google Pixel 8a a superior choice for those prioritising battery longevity and efficiency. Also of Interest: Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Review: Battery Life Stamina Meets Sophistication 2. Battery Life How long will the Google Pixel 8a battery last? Battery life refers to a smartphone's duration on a single charge, measured in days and hours. It indicates how long the smartphone can sustain various activities, such as calling, browsing, gaming, and streaming, before recharging The Google Pixel 8a test results indicate an awe-inspiring battery life of 2 days, or 48 hours, on a single charge. How does the Google Pixel 8a compare to High Tier smartphones? The Google Pixel 8a excels in battery life among High Tier smartphones, offering an impressive 48 hours of use on a single charge. This superior performance is significantly better than the Google Pixel 7, which provides only 35 hours of use. The Pixel 8a's efficient power management and robust 4,492mAh battery enable users to enjoy extended usage periods, making it an excellent choice for those who need a reliable smartphone for long days or travel without frequent recharging. Compared to the Samsung Galaxy S23 FE, the Google Pixel 8a showcases significant advantages. Despite the Galaxy S23 FE's slightly larger 4,500mAh battery, it only manages 32 hours of battery life. This contrast underscores the Pixel 8a's superior power efficiency. While the Galaxy S23 FE boasts a faster charging time, its shorter overall battery life may require more frequent recharging. The Google Pixel 8a's longer battery life and balanced charging time make it a more reliable option. 3. NEW Battery Consumption Google Pixel 8a battery review with viSer and VWS Analytics Studio The Google Pixel 8a battery life details, as analysed using SmartViser's viSer and VWS Analytics Studio, provide a technical and detailed perspective on the smartphone's battery consumption. The platform's capability to monitor and access real-time test results explains how the Google Pixel 8a manages power under various daily user tasks. ViserMark can identify the strengths and weaknesses of smartphones by comparing battery usage across similar devices, enabling potential buyers to choose the best smartphone based on their usage patterns. The test results comparing the Google Pixel 8a with the average High Tier (€500-€699) smartphone provide a detailed look at the most compelling aspects of its battery capabilities across various everyday activities. Analysing Battery Efficiency: Google Pixel 8a vs the Average High Tier Smartphone Comparison The chart illustrates the Google Pixel 8a's battery performance compared to the average high-tier smartphone across various common activities, measured in current (mA). It sets itself apart with its superior battery efficiency, a feature that is highlighted against the average High Tier smartphone. One example is its performance during social media usage, where it consumes a lower figure than the High Tier average, ensuring longer usage in social media applications, a clear advantage for potential buyers. In everyday activities such as outgoing calls and MMS the Google Pixel 8a outperforms the High Tier average, ensuring extended battery life. This is particularly beneficial for users who rely heavily on these types of communications and need their smartphones to last throughout the day. Gaming, a typically power-intensive activity, also sees the Pixel 8a performing efficiently with consumption lower than the High Tier average, so gamers can enjoy longer sessions without recharging as often. The Google Pixel 8a continues to showcase lower power consumption than the High Tier average for tasks like file transfers, camera use, YouTube streaming, and email. Specifically, its power usage for file transfers and camera operations is notably less, suggesting optimised hardware and software integration that conserves battery life. The battery performance of the Google Pixel 8a stands out due to its consistent power efficiency across various activities. It is reliable for smartphone users and has robust battery life and minimal power drain. The test results show the Pixel 8a's capability to handle daily tasks with less frequent charging, enhancing the user experience and providing substantial value in the High Tier smartphone market. Analysing Battery Efficiency: Google Pixel 8a vs Google Pixel 7 Smartphone Comparison The chart visually compares the battery performance between the Google Pixel 8a and its predecessor series, the Google Pixel 7 across various activities, measured in current (mA). In social media usage, the Google Pixel 7 outshines the Google Pixel 8a, indicating that the Pixel 7 is notably more power-efficient, allowing for extended use. Also, it shows better efficiency for outgoing calls and is more efficient in MMS usage. These differences highlight that the Google Pixel 7 conserves battery better during standard communication tasks. In gaming, a high power-consuming activity, the Google Pixel 8a demonstrates its strength, indicating a slightly better efficiency in gaming activities. Also, in media-related activities such as YouTube and media playback, the Google Pixel 8a is more efficient in media playback but less efficient in YouTube streaming. Summing up, the Google Pixel 8a does show some areas of improved efficiency, particularly in gaming, camera use, and web browsing. However, the Google Pixel 7 consistently demonstrates better battery efficiency across user activities. This suggests the Pixel 7 could offer a more balanced and power-efficient experience for users who value longer battery life across various tasks, although not as feature-rich as the latest Google Pixel 8a. Analysing Battery Efficiency: Google Pixel 8a vs Samsung Galaxy S23 FE Smartphone Comparison When comparing the battery efficiency of the Google Pixel 8a to the Samsung Galaxy S23 FE, the Pixel 8a generally demonstrates better performance. The Google Pixel 8a is more efficient for social media usage than the Samsung Galaxy S23FE. This trend continues across most activities, indicating that the Google Pixel 8a manages power consumption more effectively, resulting in extended usage times and fewer recharges. For outgoing calls and MMS, the Samsung Galaxy S23 FE again demonstrates lacking efficiency compared to the Pixel 8a which highlights the superior power management during communication tasks. In gaming, a typically high power-consuming activity, the Google Pixel 8a has a lower consumption so gamers can enjoy longer sessions without recharging as often. For tasks such as file transfers, YouTube streaming, SMS and web browsing, the Pixel 8a shows better efficiency. In email and media playback activities, the Google Pixel 8a also maintains an advantage compared to the Galaxy S23 FE. This further emphasises the Pixel 8a's ability to conserve battery life during routine tasks, communications and internet use. Notably, the camera usage shows the Google Pixel 8a consumes more battery energy, indicating that while it is generally more efficient, there are specific tasks where the Samsung Galaxy S23 FE might perform better. Analysing Battery Efficiency: Google Pixel 8a Smartphone Comparison The chart provides a comprehensive comparison of the battery performance of the Google Pixel 8a, Google Pixel 7, and Samsung Galaxy S23 FE and the High Tier average across various activities, measured in current (mA). The Google Pixel 8a's battery performance is a standout, demonstrating strong efficiency compared to the Samsung Galaxy S23 FE and, in many cases, even outperforming the Google Pixel 7 and the High Tier average. It shows higher power consumption than the Pixel 7 and the High Tier average in specific tasks but remains more efficient than the Samsung Galaxy S23 FE in certain activities. However, in other activities, the Google Pixel 8a's battery life is notably extended, making it a top choice for gaming, media playback, SMS, web browsing, email usage, and YouTube streaming. Overall, the Google Pixel 8a is a solid choice for a smartphone with balanced power management and efficient battery performance across various tasks. 4. Power Efficiency What is the Battery Efficiency of the Google Pixel 8a? Leading the comparison with a battery efficiency score of 1.5 is the Google Pixel 8a. This score indicates that the Pixel 8a manages its power consumption exceptionally well, providing more usage time. The battery efficiency for the Google Pixel 8a was 1.5 leaf out of 5. How does the Google Pixel 8a compare to HighTier smartphones? Overall, the Google Pixel 8a is the most power-efficient among the compared smartphones. Its power efficiency score of 1.5 highlights its ability to manage power consumption effectively, offering extended battery life and reducing the need for frequent recharges. Also of Interest: Motorola Moto G24 Smartphone Review: Ultimate Power and Efficiency for Everyday Use 5. Annual Energy Consumption How much energy does the Google Pixel 8a use? Annual energy consumption refers to the total energy a smartphone uses over a year. This measure helps understand the smartphone's long-term efficiency and environmental impact, indicating how much power it draws during typical usage scenarios. The Google Pixel 8a has an annual energy consumption of 3 kWh. How does the Google Pixel 8a compare to High Tier smartphones? The Google Pixel 8a demonstrates a balanced annual energy consumption compared to other High Tier smartphones. With an annual energy consumption of 3 kWh, the Pixel 8a is more efficient than the Samsung Galaxy S23 FE, which has a higher yearly energy consumption of 4.5 kWh. This significant difference makes the Google Pixel 8a a more environmentally friendly and cost-effective option in the long run. Overall, this smartphone sets a high standard for energy efficiency, with lower annual energy consumption than the Samsung Galaxy S23 FE and Google Pixel 7, and the High Tier average. This makes the Google Pixel 8a an excellent choice for users seeking a smartphone that combines performance with sustainability. VERDICT: What is it like to Use? The Google Pixel 8a delivers an impressive user experience through efficient power management and robust performance. Its 6.1-inch OLED display offers a 120Hz refresh rate, ensuring vibrant visuals and smooth scrolling for browsing, video streaming, and gaming activities. The smartphone is powered by Google's custom Tensor G3 chip paired with 8GB of RAM, guaranteeing seamless multitasking and responsiveness for everyday tasks. While the 128GB of internal storage provides ample space for apps, photos, and media, it does not support expandable storage options. One standout feature of the Google Pixel 8a is its remarkable battery efficiency. With a 4,492mAh battery, it offers up to 2 days of usage or 48 hours on a single charge, surpassing many competitors. Additionally, the Google Pixel 8a excels in every day user activities demonstrating optimised power consumption during social media, gaming, and media playback. The Google Pixel 8a provides a well-rounded, efficient, and enjoyable user experience. Its high-quality display, powerful performance, and exceptional battery life make it an ideal choice for those seeking a reliable and high-performing smartphone. Additionally, the smartphone benefits from Google's latest software updates and security patches, further enhancing its appeal and ensuring users can access the latest Google AI features and protections. What's in the box? Google Pixel 8a Smartphone USB-C-to-C cable Quick Switch Adapter SIM Tool User Manual Should I buy the Google Pixel 8a? If you prioritise long battery life, excellent camera quality, and a clean, bloatware-free Android experience, the Google Pixel 8a is a strong contender in the High Tier smartphone market. Its balance of features and performance makes it a worthwhile investment for those seeking a dependable and powerful smartphone. Extra Insights Pricing Google Pixel 8a These prices are the best from our Affiliate Partners. As an Amazon Associate, we may earn commissions from qualifying purchases from Amazon.com. You can learn more about our disclosure policy here. VCX (Valued Camera eXperience) The VCX Forum has been working with its members on the system and infrastructure as a non-profit organisation. We strive to improve our technology to develop and exchange accurate and objective quality and performance indicators, which is our ultimate goal. We will also serve as a compass for the smartphone camera industry. We appreciate your interest in the VCX Forum. No VCX reviews are available for this smartphone. Background Google is a multinational American technology company specialising in Internet-related services and products. It was founded in September 1998 by Larry Page and Sergey Brin while they were PhD students at Stanford University in California. The company has its headquarters in Mountain View, California. Google’s mission statement is "to organise the world’s information and make it universally accessible and useful". The company offers various products and services, including search engines, online advertising technologies, cloud computing, software, and hardware. Google is one of the most widely known and used search engines on the internet today. Google has a range of smartphones called Pixel phones. The company has released several models of Pixel phones over the years, including the Pixel 6A, Pixel 7, Pixel 7 Pro, Pixel Fold and the Google Pixel 7a. The latest models are the Google Pixel 8, Pixel 8 Pro and Google Pixel 8a. The phones run on the Android operating system and are known for their high-quality cameras. Get all the latest reviews. Join our readers to receive the latest update to our smartphone battery performance scores and performance reviews as soon as we finish testing! Written By Debbie Bouffler is the Marketing and Communications Manager at SmartViser. She is crucial in developing the company's communication and marketing strategies. Debbie has gained extensive experience in strategic business development and marketing in various industries, which has helped her excel in her current position. Debbie is a leader with imagination, an unmatched drive, and an infectious passion for growth and excellence, especially in the telecommunications industry. For further insights into her professional journey or to connect, visit Debbie on LinkedIn. Affiliate Disclosure: These prices are the best from our Affiliate Partners. As an Amazon Associate, we may earn commissions from qualifying purchases from Amazon.com. You can learn more about our disclosure policy here.

Samsung Galaxy A51 - Highly Recommended! Smartphone Battery Performance: Ranking #64 Placed No. 15 Smartphone for Battery Performance within the Mid Tier Ranking Table Battery Performance Testing Report and Review – March 2021 Product The Galaxy A51 comes as the evolution of the A50 model, and it is a Samsung update for a mid-range price smartphone that already succeeded in 2019 with the A50. Most changes in the A51 are related to updated hardware and a modern design, and the A51 model has 4/6 GB RAM memory and 64/128 ROM memory and the possibility to extend it up to 500 GB. Release Date: January 2021 Product Features and Specification Design: Plastic, refined and stylish design. Camera: 32 MP Front camera, f/2.2 26mm (wide),1/2.8”, 0,8µm Quad 48 MP rear camera, f/2.0, 26 mm(wide) ½.0", 0.8µm, PDAF; 12 MP rear camera, f/2.2, 123" (Ultrawide); 5 MP rear camera, f/2.4 (macro); 5 MP rear camera, f/2.2 depth. Video capture: 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps Battery: 4000 mAh (Fast charging 15W) Display: 6.5" Size: 158.5 x 73.6 x 7.9 mm Weight: 172g Memory: 64/128GB. RAM: 4/6GB Chipset: Exynos 9611 (10nm). Android: Android 10, upgradable to Android 11, One UI 3.0 Software Version: QP1A.190711.020.A515FXXU4CUA1 Battery Performance Introduction The Samsung Galaxy A51 is a Mid-tier smartphone in the ViserMark ranking (smartphones priced between 200 and 500 euros ). It is equipped with the Exynos 9611 Chipset and has a battery capacity of 4000 mAh battery with a 15W Fast Charge option. The overall Battery Performance Score is now a global score taking calculations from Battery Life, Power Efficiency and Charging Times. From the Samsung Galaxy A51 test results, we have given this Smartphone a ViserMark score of 39. The Battery Performance Label, being lower than 50, indicates that it is one of the lower-performing smartphones and has been ranked in 64th place of the Battery Performance Smartphones as tested by SmartViser. Testing Results BATTERY LIFE - Days of Use The Samsung Galaxy A51 reached 37 hours of autonomy through the ViserMark test protocol with a 60 Hz refreshing rate, obtaining a Battery Life score of 1.5 Days of Use. A Mid Tier smartphone's average Day of Use ViserMark score is “2” Days. This score places the Samsung Galaxy A51 Smartphone lower than the ViserMark Mid Tier ranking. CHARGING TIME - Hours and Minutes The charging time to 100% was 2 hours and 14 minutes. This smartphone has a built-in fast charging feature included. The average Charging Time is 1:36 for a Smartphone within the ViserMark Mid Tier. The Samsung Galaxy A51 ranks 47th in the Battery Charging Times for Smartphones. Test Graphics Our testing is based on smartphone usage from 100% battery level down to Power Off. When testing Smartphones, the testing protocol includes everyday life activities, for instance, Calls, Web, Video and Music streaming, Gaming, Social networks, Picture and Video capture and standby. All testing is performed under strictly controlled test conditions, expected in a defined order and timeline. Figure 1. ViserMark Battery Life Test at 60 Hz refresh rate Samsung Galaxy A51 Test Graphics Several power-efficient processors within today's smartphones can cope with the growing number of new smartphone applications and support high-resolution displays without compromising battery life. Power Efficiency is calculated using Battery Life and Battery Capacity. This is expressed in “Leaves" and reflects a rating between 1 being the least and 5 being the most power-efficient. Samsung Galaxy A51 achieved an overall Power Efficiency Score of 1 Best Smartphone for Power Efficiency: Ranking #71 Conclusion The battery autonomy of the Samsung Galaxy A51 is offering 1.5 days based on the ViserMark Test Protocol. The Samsung Galaxy A51's performance is far from expectations. Other devices in the same price range with a similar battery capacity performed better. An example is the Reno 4Z 5G with a performance score of 44 and the Sony L4 with a score of 45 (with a 3580 mAh battery capacity). ViserMark tests are performed with the strictest protocol in a controlled environment to ensure repetition and consistency. They are powered and automated by SmartViser’s test automation solution viSer. The automation test includes a variety of user actions, from calls to social media and periods of standby times. VCX (V alued C amera e X perience ) The VCX Forum has been working with its members on the system and infrastructure as a non-profit organisation. We strive to improve our technology to develop and exchange accurate and objective quality and performance indicators that are our ultimate goal. We will also serve as a compass for the smartphone camera industry. We appreciate your interest in VCX-Forum. Samsung Galaxy A15 Camera Rating Details See More Reviews Background The Samsung Group is a South Korean multinational conglomerate headquartered in Samsung Town, Seoul. It comprises numerous affiliated businesses, most united under the Samsung brand. Samsung Electronics has assembly plants and sales networks in 74 countries and employs around 290,000 people. Samsung is a major manufacturer of electronic components such as lithium-ion batteries, semiconductors, image sensors, camera modules and displays for clients such as Apple, Sony, HTC and Nokia. Latest Reviews If you're looking for the best smartphone on the market, battery performance is one of the vital decisive aspects. Please review the comprehensive ViserMark database of test results. ​ Not only is ViserMark the first label that measures battery performance , translating mAh into direct battery life scores, but it is also a precious marketing asset to device manufacturers and end-users . ViserMark is a benchmark to help make better-informed choices when buying a Smartphone.  Our test results and reviews are to you first! Join our readers to receive the latest update to our smartphone battery performance scores and performance reviews as soon as we finish testing! If you are a Smartphone M anufacturer looking to improve your Smartphone's battery Performance, don't hesitate to contact us to discuss how we can help you.

Smartphones have become essential to modern life due to their versatility and usefulness. Smartphones have transformed how we live and work, making our lives more connected, productive, and convenient. Some of the main reasons are: Communication: Smartphones enable us to stay connected with others through phone calls, text messages, and social media apps. They have made communication more accessible and convenient than ever before. Information: Smartphones provide instant access to vast amounts of information through the internet. They allow us to search for answers quickly, look up news and current events, and access educational resources. Productivity: Smartphones are powerful tools for productivity, allowing us to manage our schedules, send emails, and work on documents on the go. They can also provide access to productivity apps like to-do lists, calendars, and project management tools. Entertainment: Smartphones offer a range of entertainment options, from streaming video and music to playing games and reading books. They have become a primary source of entertainment for many people. Navigation: Smartphones have made getting around easier with built-in GPS and map apps. They can provide turn-by-turn directions and real-time traffic updates, making navigating unfamiliar areas easier. It is no surprise that we want the best battery performance on our smartphone devices to allow us to continue using them without interruptions for everything important to us. Smartphone Battery Technology There are several different smartphone battery technologies in use today. The most common types of batteries used in smartphones are lithium-ion and lithium-polymer batteries. Lithium-ion batteries are popular due to their high energy density, relatively low self-discharge rate, and long lifespan. These batteries use a liquid electrolyte to transfer ions between the anode and cathode and are generally safe when properly manufactured and used. Overall, the trend in smartphone battery technology has been towards higher energy density, longer lifespan, and faster charging times. Manufacturers are continually researching and developing new materials and techniques to improve battery performance and address concerns around safety and environmental impact. How ViserMark Test Battery Life At ViserMark, we perform a variety of testing to ensure that the battery is functioning properly and to determine how long it can last under different usage scenarios. Thanks to the test automation capabilities of viSer, we can test battery life using the smartphone under normal usage conditions, monitoring how long the battery lasts. This is done by setting up the phone to simulate typical usages (Day of Use), such as web browsing, video playback, voice calls, and other activities. Battery Life Testing Process 1) Device Calibration Each device that arrives in our lab is strictly calibrated to ensure that all devices are tested with the same conditions, ensuring repeatability and consistency. The calibration includes fixing parameters like brightness levels, audio volume, and connectivity setups like Bluetooth, NFC, GPS etc). All devices are fully charged before starting the testing. 2) Environment Strict Conditions As with the device calibrations at ViserMark lab, we follow a very strict protocol on external environmental conditions. All testing takes place on live network conditions to ensure we test closer to end users. Performing testing in the lab will never give a true picture of a device's battery life. We test on good network conditions. The network can greatly impact the smartphone battery life, and weak network conditions normally use more power from the device, impacting the battery life. We also ensure the room ventilation in the lab is at a certain level, as this can impact the battery life performance. 3) Testing Once the device and the environment are calibrated and checked, it's time to perform the testing. We use the test automation viSer to ensure all the testing is performed the same without any human error. viSer runs the Day Of Use scenario. The Day Of Use scenario includes several usages as the end user performs. Our team of experts created the scenario with input from several surveys on how people use their devices regularly and feedback from media and Mobile Network operators. During the testing viSer monitors all activities and any battery abnormal behaviour. If the battery percentage drops rapidly or the device shuts down unexpectedly, this could indicate a problem with the battery. We also monitor the temperature to ensure there are no overheating issues. All results from the testing are available in the SmartViser Analytics Studio, which allows in-depth analysis of the results and behaviours. Once the results review is completed and the scores are finalised, we can prepare the ViserMark labels and in-depth reviews. You can check the latest reviews here If you are a smartphone manufacturer or media reviewer testing phones, you can join the SmartViser viSer Free Trial Programme. Susie Siouti is the Chief Commercial Officer for SmartViser, helping organisations in the Telecommunications industry offer the superior end-user quality of experience and service by introducing innovative test automation products. Susie has 20 years of experience in the Telecoms industry and has led teams worldwide, mainly in Testing and Compliance. Holding an MBA from Henley Business School brings diverse skills and expertise, including business acumen, strategic thinking, financial management, sales and marketing expertise, leadership, and innovation. Susie joined SmartViser in 2016 and is part of the internal steering committee responsible for developing and implementing the company's commercial strategy and encouraging a customer-centric culture. The main mission is to help organizations to create value by offering better quality products and services by improving operational efficiency and innovation. Never miss out on our FREE Smartphone Reviews. Simply add your email below to sign-up for our monthly newsletter providing you with all the latest mobile phones that ViserMark have tried and tested. No pressure, you can unsubscribe at any time, and we promise not to fill up your inbox.

SMARTPHONE TIER: ENTRY Battery Capacity mAh: 5000 Xiaomi Redmi A2 - A Smartphone Balancing Power and Affordability Smartphone Battery Performance: Score: 44/100 Overall Battery Performance: Ranking #80 Based on Price Entry Tier: Ranking: #8 All you need to know about the Xiaomi Redmi A2 smartphone. Quick Summary The Xiaomi Redmi A2 is affordable. This price point does come with some compromises, particularly regarding performance and camera quality. However, its compact design, satisfactory display quality, and robust battery make it a worthy consideration for those seeking a basic, low-cost smartphone. While it doesn't boast the latest features or peak performance, it offers value for its price segment. Xiaomi Redmi A2 Overview What is it like to Use? Dimensioned at 164.9 x 76.75 x 9.09 mm and weighing 192 grams, the Xiaomi Redmi A2 is ergonomically designed for everyday use. Its compactness ensures it easily slides into pockets or purses. Constructed with a plastic chassis, a textured finish ensures an enhanced grip. Protection-wise, the matte surface is a relief against fingerprints, but without rugged features, one might consider an external protective case. How does it Perform? The Xiaomi Redmi A2 is equipped with a MediaTek Helio G36 octa-core processor, which, while suitable for basic tasks and navigation, may not be considered exceptional in terms of performance compared to higher-end smartphones. The MediaTek Helio G36 processor, combined with 2GB or 3GB of RAM, may lead to occasional stutters and slow loading times when running more complex apps. If you're looking for a device that can smoothly handle demanding tasks, the Xiaomi Redmi A2 might not be the best choice. What's in the box? Mobile Phone USB-C charging cable SIM eject tool Warranty Card User Guide Smartphone Battery Performance Score and Battery Performance Results ViserMark brings you a Smartphone Performance Score based on different criteria and benchmarks for evaluating a smartphone's performance. Our tests are performed with the strictest protocol in a controlled environment to ensure repetition and consistency powered by SmartViser's test automation solution viSer. You can view our results shown as ViserMark Labels for every smartphone in our comprehensive database, as verified by SmartViser. For additional information, please refer to the detailed smartphone rankings available here. The Xiaomi Redmi A2 Battery Performance review by ViserMark is based on the smartphone battery performance results obtained during testing. ViserMark Labels for the Xiaomi Redmi A2 are detailed here. Learn more about the ViserMark Labels. Smartphone Battery Performance Reading this review, you can find a full breakdown of our battery performance results. Battery Performance Score Battery Life Battery Efficiency Annual Energy Consumption Watch the Video Review Battery Performance What is the Xiaomi Redmi A2 Battery Performance Score? The results of our testing showed the Xiaomi A2 scored 44 out of 100 as a smartphone Battery Performance score for a ViserMark Entry Tier (€0-€199) smartphone. How does the Xiaomi Redmi A2 compare to other Entry Tier smartphones? Battery performance is pivotal when choosing a smartphone, particularly in the Entry Tier (€0-€199) segment. Through the ViserMark Battery Performance scores, we gain an objective measure to compare these devices. Let’s see how these smartphones, the OPPO A57, Honor X7 and the Xiaomi Redmi A2, stack up against each other to help potential buyers make informed decisions. Learn more about the ViserMark Labels. From the chart above, this makes for an exciting and closely matched smartphone review. Let's take an in-depth view of our battery performance results for these smartphones. With a 44 out of 100 battery performance score, the Xiaomi Redmi A2 confidently positions itself in the higher part of the Entry Tier. Its MediaTek Helio G36 octa-core processor, coupled with 2GB or 3GB of RAM, is suitable for everyday tasks. Its 6.52-inch IPS LCD display and 720 x 1600 pixels resolution ensure that users get a decent visual experience, whether browsing or catching up on their favourite shows. With a focus on longevity, Xiaomi uses a plastic chassis for the Xiaomi Redmi A2, ensuring it can withstand the occasional bump. The textured back is not just a design choice but a functional one, ensuring the phone remains securely in hand and reduces the risk of accidental drops. Although not the most powerful smartphone, the Xiaomi Redmi A2 does ensure efficient power management. This makes it a viable choice for users who want a balance between performance and power longevity. All smartphones are thoroughly tested and verified by SmartViser. Every smartphone has a review written by ViserMark, which provides all the battery performance test results translated into ViserMark Labels. TOP TEN SMARTPHONE BATTERY PERFORMANCE Find out more Battery Life How long will the Xiaomi Redmi A2 battery last? A smartphone's performance and battery life determine its reliability and user satisfaction. An average battery performance lasting 2 days with 54 hours between charges for the Xiaomi Redmi A2. Learn more about the ViserMark Labels. How does the Xiaomi Redmi A2 compare to other Entry Tier smartphones? Battery life is one of the paramount considerations for many smartphone users. While the capacity of a battery (measured in mAh) indicates how long a smartphone might last, real-world usage and performance can vary due to factors like software optimisation, hardware efficiency, and user behaviour. With the battery capacity all equal at 5000mAh for Honor X7, the OPPO A57 and Xiaomi Redmi A2 smartphones, it's intriguing to see how real-world performance pans out. Very closely trailing the OPPO A57, the Xiaomi Redmi A2 impresses with a battery life extending up to 2 days, equivalent to 54 hours. This smartphone, though only an hour short of the OPPO A57, offers robust battery performance. Its MediaTek Helio G36 processor plays a role in power management, ensuring users get the most out of every charge. All smartphones undergo rigorous testing and verification by SmartViser. ViserMark provides a review for each smartphone, translating battery performance test results into ViserMark Labels. TOP TEN SMARTPHONE BATTERY LIFE Find out more Power Efficiency What is the Battery Efficiency of the Xiaomi Redmi A2? How does the XImaoi Redmi A2 compare to other Entry Tier smartphones? Understanding a smartphone's annual energy consumption is as crucial as knowing its features. With sustainability being a driving factor, discerning consumers look beyond mere battery life and delve into how efficiently their smartphones consume energy annually. Here, we've compared the annual battery consumption of three trending entry-tier smartphones: the OPPO A57, Honor X7, and Xiaomi Redmi A2. This smartphone has a 6.52-inch IPS LCD display and brings a vision of performance without compromise. Its efficiency score of 1.5 out of 5 leaves suggests a balance between providing vibrant visuals and conserving battery power. Also, the Xiaomi Redmi A2's architecture is built around optimising energy use. This ensures that even during demanding tasks, the smartphone manages its battery resources efficiently, providing users with a lasting experience. All three smartphones offer varying battery efficiency. The Xiaomi Redmi A2 and OPPO A57 lead the pack with scores of 1.5, while the Honor X7 trails slightly despite its visual prowess. For consumers, this provides a clear picture of what to expect from their smartphones regarding efficient battery utilisation, aiding them in making an informed choice. This page provides a comprehensive comparison of battery efficiency tests we've conducted. More smartphone Battery Efficiency ratings in the Smartphone Ranking Table. Annual Energy Consumption How much energy does the Xiaomi Redmi A2 use? How does the Xiaomi Redmi A2 compare to other Entry Tier smartphones? Understanding a device's annual energy consumption is as crucial as knowing its features. With sustainability being a driving factor, discerning consumers look beyond mere battery life and delve into how efficiently their smartphones consume energy annually. Here, we've compared the annual battery consumption of three trending entry-tier smartphones: OPPO A57, Honor X7, and Xiaomi Redmi A2. This smartphone, boasting its impressive 6.52-inch IPS LCD display, doesn't just offer bright visuals but also does so in an energy-conscious manner. A consumption rate of 3kWh annually means that users can enjoy top-tier performance without excessively draining energy resources. Behind the scenes, the Xiaomi Redmi A2's internal mechanics and software optimisations reduce unnecessary power drain, ensuring the smartphone balances utility and energy conservation. More smartphone Annual Energy Consumption ratings in the Smartphone Ranking Table. VERDICT: Should I buy the Xiaomi Redmi A2? The Xiaomi Redmi A2 is an extremely affordable smartphone. However, this affordability has some trade-offs, especially in performance and camera capabilities. While it's suitable for basic daily tasks, it may not meet the expectations of users looking for a more powerful or feature-rich smartphone. It has a compact, lightweight design, decent display quality, and a long-lasting battery. If you're looking for a no-frills, low-cost smartphone for basic tasks, the Xiaomi Redmi A2 could be worth considering, but it's not a device that will impress with cutting-edge features or high-end performance. The OPPO A57 is known for its excellent battery performance, scoring 53 out of 100 and offering longevity and 33W super-fast charging. The IPS LCD display produces vibrant colours, even at lower resolutions, and comes with OPPO AI Eye Comfort and blue light reduction technology, making it ideal for extended screen time. The design is a perfect blend of glass and polycarbonate, offering both functionality and aesthetics. Its lightweight and ergonomic design ensures a comfortable grip for extended use, making it an excellent choice for budget-conscious consumers. Compared to the Xiaomi Redmi A2, the OPPO A57 has a slightly longer battery life, lasting up to 55 hours or 2 days on a single charge. Users can use the phone all day without needing to charge it. This slight advantage could be due to its power consumption management and demonstrates OPPO's commitment to producing efficient yet powerful devices. The Honor X7 is an impressive smartphone in the Entry Tier, boasting an elongated 18:9 bezel-less display. It scored 41 out of 100 for battery performance. With 5000 mAh, the Honor X7 falls within the standard battery capacity for smartphones in the Entry Tier range. A fully charged battery provides 1.5 days of use. However, it scored 1 out of 5 for power efficiency. However, it has some limitations due to its Entry Tier classification, such as occasional slowness and heating issues during extended use. It is not dustproof or water-resistant, lacks NFC functionality, and is not 5G compatible. Nevertheless, the Honor X7 is a good choice for those on a tight budget looking to replace their smartphone. Watch the Video Review Check out our video review of the Xiaomi Redmi A2 smartphone. Our battery performance overview will explain the ViserMark Labels in under 10 minutes so you can decide about your next smartphone purchase. Product Features and Specification Release Date March 2023 Extra Insights VCX (Valued Camera eXperience) The VCX Forum has been working with its members on the system and infrastructure as a non-profit organisation. We strive to improve our technology to develop and exchange accurate and objective quality and performance indicators that are our ultimate goal. We will also serve as a compass for the smartphone camera industry. We appreciate your interest in VCX-Forum. No VCX reviews are available for this smartphone. See More Reviews Background Xiaomi was founded in 2010 by serial entrepreneur Lei Jun, who believes in high quality. Technology doesn't need to cost a fortune. It is focused on being the most user-centric mobile internet company. With more than 61 million handsets sold in 2014 and products launched in Taiwan, Hong Kong, Singapore, Malaysia, Philippines, India, Indonesia, and Brazil, Xiaomi is expanding its footprint worldwide to become a global brand. Xiaomi is headquartered in Beijing, China, and has offices in Asia-Pacific, India, and Brazil. Latest Reviews ViserMark wants to help you find and compare the right smartphone, ensuring it fits your requirements and budget. Our smartphone battery performance reviews and helpful ratings have all the necessary battery information. Smartphone Performance Scores can also provide a reference point for performance benchmarks and smartphone comparisons. Our test results and reviews are to you first! Join our readers to receive the latest update to our smartphone battery performance scores and performance reviews as soon as we finish testing! If you are a Smartphone Manufacturer looking to improve your Smartphone's battery Performance, don't hesitate to contact us to discuss how we can help you.

Mobile Networks have evolved significantly over the past few decades, with each new generation offering faster speeds, lower latency, and new capabilities. An overview of the evolution of Mobile Networks from 1G to 5G: 1G (First Generation): 1G, or the first generation of Mobile Networks, was introduced in the 1980s. It primarily supported analogue voice communication and was quite basic compared to modern standards. Users could make voice calls, but no data services or internet connectivity were available on these networks. 2G (Second Generation): 2G was introduced in the early 1990s and significantly improved over 1G. It introduced digital voice communication, which improved call quality and allowed for some basic data services like text messaging (SMS). However, internet access was still limited. 3G (Third Generation): 3G emerged in the early 2000s and brought substantial improvements in mobile communications. It enabled faster data transfer rates, making accessing the internet on mobile devices possible. With 3G, users could browse the web, send emails, and use more advanced data-based applications. 4G (Fourth Generation): 4G, rolled out in the late 2000s, represented a major leap in mobile technology. It provided even faster data speeds and lower latency, making streaming high-definition videos, online gaming, and video conferencing smoother and more reliable. 5G (Fifth Generation): 5G is the latest and most advanced mobile network technology, first introduced in the 2010s. It offers significantly faster data transfer rates, reduced latency, and increased network capacity. 5G enables revolutionary technologies such as the Internet of Things (IoT), augmented reality (AR), virtual reality (VR), and ultra-high-definition video streaming. It is designed to handle many connected devices and support advanced applications that require near-instantaneous data transmission. In summary, the evolution of Mobile Networks from 1G to 5G has seen vast improvements in data speed, call quality, and the ability to support a wide range of data-intensive applications and services, transforming how we communicate and use mobile devices. Many countries are accelerating their 5G infrastructure investment, and we have recently heard President Biden talk about the infrastructure plan and his goals to invest heavily in the expansion of 5G. How have speeds changed from 2G to 5G, and how does that affect how you use your smartphones? Regarding data transfer speeds, 5G is faster than 4G, which is faster than 3G, and so on. Each generation of Mobile Networks has seen significant improvements in data speeds, leading to faster and more efficient communication. Here's a general comparison of the data transfer speeds for each generation: 2G: Data speeds were typically in the range of kilobits per second (Kbps). It provided basic data services like text messaging (SMS) and limited internet access. 3G: Data speeds improved to the range of megabits per second (Mbps). It allowed for better internet browsing, email access, and basic video streaming. 4G: Data speeds increased further to the range of tens of megabits per second (Mbps) to hundreds of megabits per second (Mbps). This enabled seamless HD video streaming, online gaming, and faster downloads/uploads. 5G: Data speeds in 5G Networks can range from hundreds of megabits per second (Mbps) to multiple gigabits per second (Gbps). 5G's ultra-fast speeds enable applications like 8K video streaming, real-time virtual and augmented reality experiences, and super-fast downloads of large files. Learn more on 5G: https://www.qualcomm.com/5g/what-is-5g It's important to note that while 5G is much faster than its predecessors, its performance can vary based on factors like network infrastructure, location, and the number of connected devices. Nonetheless, 5G represents a significant advancement in mobile network technology, promising to revolutionise various industries and enhance user experiences. The above diagram shows examples of the difference in downloading the same film on different technologies. We have selected for this example downloading ET the movie, which is a 1-hour and 45 minutes film. Using 3G will take an astonishing 12 hours, like a flight from London, UK, to Singapore. On 4G, it will be long enough to make a cup of tea and prepare the snacks, but 5G will take as long as a blink of an eye. The download speeds are based on optimum network conditions, and results may vary depending on the areas and networks. What is next in Mobile Networks evolution? 6G (Sixth Generation) The sixth generation of Mobile Networks, also known as 6G, is still in development but is expected to be introduced in the early 2030s. 6G Networks are expected to offer data rates of up to 1 terabit per second (Tbps), which is 100 times faster than 5G networks. 6G Networks are also expected to be more reliable and secure than 5G Networks. They are expected to be used for many applications, including ultra-high-definition video streaming, virtual reality, augmented reality, and self-driving cars. The evolution of Mobile Networks has been driven by the demand for faster data speeds and more reliable connectivity. As new applications and technologies emerge, the demand for even faster and more reliable networks will continue to grow. Conclusion Here are some of the key conclusions from the evolution of Mobile Networks from 1G to 5G: Mobile Networks have become increasingly faster, more reliable, and more capable. The demand for mobile data has grown exponentially, driving the need for faster and more reliable networks. New technologies, such as 5G and 6G, are on their way to revolutionise how we use Mobile Networks. The future of Mobile Networks is bright, with the potential to enable a wide range of new applications and services. Susie Siouti is the Chief Commercial Officer for SmartViser, helping organisations in the Telecommunications industry offer superior end-user quality of experience and service by introducing innovative test automation products. Susie has 20 years of experience in the Telecoms industry and, in that time, has led teams across the world, mainly in Testing and Compliance. Holding an MBA from Henley Business School brings diverse skills and expertise, including business acumen, strategic thinking, financial management, sales and marketing expertise, leadership, and innovation. Susie joined SmartViser in 2016 and is part of the internal steering committee responsible for developing and implementing the company's commercial strategy and encouraging a customer-centric culture. The main mission is to help organizations to create value by offering better quality products and services by improving operational efficiency and innovation. Never miss out on our FREE Smartphone Reviews. Simply add your email below to sign-up for our monthly newsletter providing you with all the latest mobile phones that ViserMark have tried and tested. No pressure, you can unsubscribe at any time, and we promise not to fill up your inbox.

A surprising trend is emerging in an age dominated by smartphones—dumb phones. These straightforward devices, a stark contrast to their more intelligent counterparts, are becoming increasingly popular, particularly among those seeking a break from the complexities and intrusions of modern smartphones. Understanding Dumb Phones A dumb phone, often called a feature phone, is a practical and reliable choice for those who primarily use their phones for calling and texting. These phones, unlike smartphones, don't have advanced operating systems or extensive app support. They are not designed for high-speed internet access. However, some modern dumb phones have adapted to provide limited internet connectivity and access to simple apps like WhatsApp. This allows for basic online interactions, but importantly, without the multitude of distractions that smartphones often bring. Features of Dumb Phones Dumb phones are characterised by their simplicity. They typically feature a small non-touch display, a physical keypad, and a robust, long-lasting battery, contributing significantly to their durability and user-friendliness. Their lack of complex features means they consume less power and are often more rugged than smartphones, making them ideal for a durable, long-lasting device. One of the key appeals of dumb phones is their ability to enhance privacy and security. These phones are less prone to cybersecurity risks and personal data breaches without constant internet connectivity. They are also less likely to be theft targets than high-value smartphones. The Generational Shift Towards Dumb Phones Interestingly, it’s not just the older generations drawn to dumb phones. Many young adults, mainly from Generation Z in the United States, are adopting these phones. This shift is primarily motivated by a desire to reduce screen time and escape the constant barrage of social media and notifications that come with smartphones. For many in this generation, dumb phones offer a way to manage mental health and decrease digital overload. The Best Dumb Phones in 2024 Light Phone II  - Features a minimalist design with an electronic paper screen resembling an e-reader. It focuses on basic functionalities like music, a calendar, alarms, and a calculator but does not support social media, email, or web browsing. Its sleek design and basic features are a top choice for those seeking a minimalist phone experience. (Credit Image: Light) Punkt MP02 - Designed by Jasper Morrison, this phone brings a unique minimalist-modern aesthetic and ergonomic design. It includes Bluetooth, an alarm, a timer, a calendar, and a calculator. Its distinctive ringtones and simple interface make it a stylish accessory for minimalists.   (Credit Image: Punkt) Available models and pricing options. Nokia 6300  - For those looking for a slightly more connected experience, the Nokia 6300 offers limited access to social media like Facebook and WhatsApp and functionalities like YouTube and FM radio. It provides a bridge between the old and the new, maintaining a classic design with some modern conveniences.  (Credit Image: Nokia) Available models and pricing options. Nokia 2780 Flip   - The Nokia 2780 Flip features a good camera and supports various apps, making it suitable for those who need more from their phone but still prefer a simple, user-friendly interface. Its flip design is nostalgic and functional, providing a compact form factor that is becoming popular again. (Credit Image: Nokia) TCL Flip 2   - The TCL Flip 2 offers basic phone functionalities and is ideal for those who need a secondary phone for emergencies or specific situations where a smartphone is unnecessary. It includes features like Bluetooth, email, and a browser, making it highly affordable yet functional. (Credit Image: TCL) These prices are the best from our Affiliate Partners. As an Amazon Associate, we may earn commissions from qualifying purchases from Amazon.com . You can learn more about our disclosure policy here . The Boring Phone: A Symbol of Simplicity This device isn’t just another feature phone; it's a statement about modern connectivity and the desire for a digital detox, backed by an unlikely partnership between Heineken , Bodega, and Human Mobile Devices ( HMD ). Set to launch at Milan Design Week with a limited run of 5,000 units, The Boring Phone is designed to reduce digital distractions and promote real-world interactions.   The Boring Phone emerges as a response to the pervasive problem of "doom-scrolling"—the habit of endlessly scrolling through social media, often while ignoring the company of others. Heineken’s initiative aims to allow people to enjoy their social outings without the constant buzz and ping of notifications. Their research indicates that a significant portion of young adults in the UK and the US feel overwhelmed by their digital habits, particularly in social settings. The phone itself is a throwback with a modern twist. It features a transparent design that showcases its internal workings—a nod to the current trend towards transparent electronics. Its specifications are deliberately minimal: a 2.8-inch monochrome display, a basic 0.3MP camera, FM radio, and the classic game Snake. The phone supports essential functions like calling and texting, with dual SIM capabilities and a week-long battery life on standby. Watch this video   that shows Heineken's initiative to bring back genuine connections and face-to-face interactions. The creation of The Boring Phone is part of HMD’s new direction under its white-label business, which also includes an upcoming Barbie-themed flip phone in collaboration with Mattel. This strategy marks a shift for HMD, aiming to diversify its offerings beyond just manufacturing Nokia-branded phones. The partnership with Heineken and Bodega is strategic, leveraging their status as cultural tastemakers to position The Boring Phone not just as a gadget, but as a lifestyle accessory. The phone's limited functionality is designed to help users establish boundaries with their tech, offering a tool that supports connectivity without the compulsions fostered by more advanced devices. HMD plans to explore the feature phone market further, potentially introducing more devices that cater to the niche demand for simplicity over multi-functionality. A new app in June will "turn smartphones boring", aiming to replicate the minimalist experience of The Boring Phone on more conventional devices. Conclusion The resurgence of dumb phones highlights a fascinating evolution in consumer technology, where less can indeed be more. This trend is not merely a rejection of modern smartphones but a deliberate choice for a balanced digital lifestyle. As the world grapples with the implications of constant connectivity, dumb phones stand out as a beacon for those seeking simplicity, functionality, and a break from the digital noise. Whether this trend will grow into a significant market shift remains to be seen, but the current interest suggests a notable shift in how we perceive and use our mobile devices. Written By: Marcella Frattari  is the Digital Communications Manager at SmartViser, primarily responsible for ViserMark content creation and social media management. She holds a journalism background and is pursuing a master's degree in digital communications and marketing. Marcella brings a dynamic and creative approach to her work, consistently striving to enhance the company's online presence and engagement. Press Contact: Debbie Bouffler: Contact@visermark.com Never miss out on our FREE Smartphone Reviews. Add  your email below to sign up for  our monthly newsletter ,   which provides all the latest mobile phones that ViserMark has tried  and tested. No pressure; you can unsubscribe anytime,  and we promise not to fill up your inbox.

Battery Impact between 4G and 5G – Latest information and updates from the ViserMark Lab At ViserMark and through our technical lab SmartViser, we regularly receive questions about the impact of 5G on device battery performance. Some of the questions we receive, which we will aim to answer below, are: Should I switch to 5G to preserve more battery life? What is the impact of using 5G on the Battery life? What is the impact of the network on my device's battery life? Do different 5G networks have different impacts? Do device manufacturers optimise their software to improve battery life performance when using 5G How does 5G impact the battery life of my smartphone? What is the drain battery percentage by using 5G vs 4G? This is a very hot topic among end-users, device manufacturers, Mobile Network Operators (MNOs), and MVNOs. Since the beginning of the network evolution 2G->3G->4G->5G NR (NSA and SA)*, we see a continued trend of the increased impact these technologies have on the battery life and performance of a mobile or smartphone device. *5G NR (New Radio) is a new radio access technology (RAT) developed by 3GPP for the 5G (fifth generation) mobile network. The non-standalone (NSA) mode of 5G NR refers to a 5G NR deployment option that depends on an existing 4G LTE network for control functions. The standalone (SA) mode of 5G NR refers to using 5G cells for signalling and information transfer. It includes the new 5G Packet Core architecture instead of relying on the 4G Evolved Packet Core to allow the deployment of 5G without the LTE network. At ViserMark lab, we have seen assessing the launch of the first 5G NSA (Non-Stand Alone) since it has become commercially available in several different countries and networks with a specific focus in France and the UK. Since the launch of the first commercial 5G NSA networks, the following have been noted during our testing: There is an impact on the battery life of about 10% more battery usage on 5G vs 4G Web loading performance and throughput rates / Data were, on average, 20% better in 5SA than in 4G, as expected Smartphone manufacturers have been looking for ways to optimise their software that utilises 5G services in the best way to minimise the impact on the battery. The early 5G capable devices, once 5G NSA coverage is available, will camp on this all the time. Almost all device manufacturers have included unique optimisation in their software to only use 5G in use cases where 5G will make a difference. For example, if you are in an area with good 5G NSA coverage and browsing the web, 5G will be utilised as it significantly enhances the user experience. If, on the other hand, the device is in an area with radio conditions leading to 5G not bringing a significant advantage in performance to balance higher power drain, then the device may decide to stay in 4G. However, the 5G icon will remain displayed. This optimisation is implemented in two main setups: The majority of manufacturers, especially Android devices. Software is optimised, and the end-user has no control over how the devices select to utilise 5G. The user has control over how the 5G option is managed. The example below shows how Apple devices operate this option. Apple offers detailed instructions on 5G icons and Software optimisation. For more details, see here. Screenshot from Apple 12 model in SW 15.4.1 Apple offers detailed instructions on 5G icons and Software optimisation. For more details, see here. Samsung also has special support for 5G and software optimisation. More details can be found here. Unlike Apple, Samsung and Google Pixel do not only offer the option to switch to 5G without any further control over how 5G is utilised. Conclusion Based on the testing we have performed, there is an impact on the battery life of about 10% between 4G vs 5G on use cases that benefit from the 5G services. ** Data transfer speed exceeds 20% on average, meaning 5G is faster than 4G, so it's up to users to decide whether this is an acceptable trade-off. If the device offers the 5G battery optimisation option, ensure it is selected for better performance and battery life. As the first 5G SA networks appear in 2022, we will be checking the impact on the device and if there is a substantial difference between 5G NSA vs 5G SA. **Results from mainly France and UK networks Don’t miss out on news, competitions, and the latest tech info; subscribe to our newsletter. Fully Charged is our update from ViserMark that directly brings you exclusive Smartphone reviews and performance insights every month to your inbox. Coming Soon: NEXT ARTICLE - Top-performing devices in 2022 on Battery Life

Imagine a world where the phrase "battery low" no longer sends a shiver down your spine and where a single minute is all it takes to recharge your smartphone fully. This vision is no longer a far-fetched fantasy but an emerging reality, thanks to groundbreaking research from the University of Colorado . This innovative study, led by chemical engineer  Ankur Gupta  and published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) , promises to revolutionise our approach to battery technology through supercapacitors.  The Supercapacitor Advantage  At the heart of this innovation lies the supercapacitor—a device that merges the best properties of batteries and capacitors. Unlike traditional batteries, which store energy through chemical reactions, supercapacitors store and release energy quickly by moving ions within porous materials. This process not only allows for rapid charging and discharging but also significantly extends the lifespan of the energy storage device. The key breakthrough in Gupta's research is the enhanced movement of ions through supercapacitors. By applying principles from the study of fluid flow in porous materials, typically used in water filtration and oil extraction, Gupta's team has developed a new model for studying and optimising the behaviour of ions within these devices. This model could drastically improve the efficiency of supercapacitors, making it feasible to charge a smartphone in just one minute. How Supercapacitors Work To understand why this is revolutionary, it’s essential to grasp the basic working principle of a supercapacitor. Traditional batteries rely on chemical reactions to store energy, which can degrade over time. Supercapacitors, however, create an electric field that holds ions on the surface of porous electrodes. This method eliminates the wear and tear associated with chemical reactions, thereby increasing the durability and speed of the device.  A capacitor, fundamentally, consists of two conductive plates separated by an insulating material known as a dielectric. When voltage is applied, an electric field is created, storing energy. Supercapacitors expand on this concept by using porous materials to maximise the surface area for ion storage, significantly boosting their capacity and speed.  Energy Density vs. Power Density     Supercapacitors excel in power density, meaning they can deliver a large amount of energy quickly, which is ideal for applications requiring quick bursts of power. However, their energy density—how much energy they store per unit volume or weight—is significantly lower than lithium-ion batteries. This lower energy density means that devices powered solely by supercapacitors need more frequent recharging than traditional batteries. This could translate to shorter driving ranges for applications like electric vehicles unless substantial energy storage capacity advancements are achieved. Self-Discharge and Longevity  Supercapacitors have one notable drawback - their higher self-discharge rate than batteries. This means that supercapacitors lose stored energy more quickly when not in use, which can be a disadvantage for long-term energy storage applications. However, supercapacitors have a much longer lifespan in terms of charge/discharge cycles. They can withstand over a million cycles without significant degradation, whereas lithium-ion batteries typically endure only a few thousand cycles. This durability could lead to fewer replacements, lower long-term costs, and a reduced environmental impact. Material and Environmental Considerations  The materials utilised in supercapacitors, like activated carbon and newer nanostructured materials such as MXenes, are generally more sustainable and accessible for recycling than those used in lithium-ion batteries. This makes supercapacitors a more environmentally friendly material sourcing and end-of-life disposal option. However, optimising the production processes for these advanced materials is important to minimise their environmental impact. Hybrid Systems   Researchers are exploring hybrid systems that combine the strengths of both technologies. These systems can utilize supercapacitors to handle sudden power demands while depending on batteries for long-term energy storage. This combination could alleviate some of the limitations of each technology, providing a well-rounded solution for various applications, from consumer electronics to electric vehicles. Overcoming the Challenges  While the potential benefits of supercapacitors are immense, several challenges remain before they can be widely adopted in consumer electronics. One significant hurdle is ensuring that the infrastructure for charging these devices can handle the high currents required for rapid energy transfer. Researchers are exploring hybrid systems that combine the strengths of both technologies. These systems can utilise supercapacitors to handle sudden power demands while depending on batteries for long-term energy storage. This combination could alleviate each technology's limitations, providing a well-rounded solution for various applications, from consumer electronics to electric vehicles.   Economic and Environmental Impacts  Transitioning from traditional batteries to supercapacitors also raises essential economic and environmental considerations. The production and disposal of batteries pose significant environmental challenges, including extracting raw materials and generating electronic waste. Supercapacitors, with their longer lifespan and rapid charging capabilities, could reduce the frequency of battery replacements and lessen environmental impact. It's important to scrutinize the manufacturing processes for supercapacitors in terms of their environmental footprint. Scaling production to meet global demand responsibly is crucial for any new technology. This involves responsibly sourcing materials and ensuring that the disposal of supercapacitors at the end of their life does not create new environmental hazards. Future Prospects and Applications  The implications of supercapacitor technology extend far beyond smartphones. Electric vehicles, laptops, and even large-scale energy storage systems benefit from supercapacitors' rapid charging capabilities and durability. In electric cars, for instance, reducing charging times from hours to minutes could significantly enhance convenience and usability, potentially accelerating the adoption of electric mobility. Furthermore, the Internet of Things (IoT) and wearable devices could substantially advance by integrating supercapacitors. The ability to rapidly recharge these devices without frequent battery replacements would make them more practical and efficient for everyday use. Conclusion  The research led by Ankur Gupta and his team at the University of Colorado marks a pivotal step towards a future where battery anxiety is a thing of the past. By leveraging the unique properties of supercapacitors, this innovation promises to revolutionise how we charge our devices and usher in a new era of sustainable and efficient energy storage.  Undeniably, the path to widespread adoption of this transformative technology will be challenging. However, the potential benefits - from a significant reduction in electronic waste to improved performance and convenience - make this an exciting frontier for researchers and consumers. The possibility of charging our devices in mere seconds is on the horizon, and it's a future that looks incredibly promising. Watch an interview with Ankur Gupta on CNN News where he explains a new technology that can charge laptops, and phones in just a minute. Written By: Marcella Frattari  is the Digital Communications Manager at SmartViser, primarily responsible for ViserMark content creation and social media management. She holds a journalism background and is pursuing a master's degree in digital communications and marketing. Marcella brings a dynamic and creative approach to her work, consistently striving to enhance the company's online presence and engagement. Press Contact: Debbie Bouffler: Contact@visermark.com Subscribe for the Latest Reviews     Never miss out on our FREE Smartphone Reviews. Add  your email below to sign up for  our monthly newsletter ,   which provides all the latest mobile phones that ViserMark has tried  and tested. No pressure; you can unsubscribe anytime,  and we promise not to fill up your inbox. Subscribe for the Latest Reviews

The curtain has fallen on Apple’s Worldwide Developers Conference 2024 , and as expected, it was a tour de force of innovation, particularly in the realm of artificial intelligence. From the introduction of Apple Intelligence to significant updates across all major operating systems, Apple has once again demonstrated its commitment to pushing the envelope of technology while maintaining its hallmark emphasis on privacy and user-friendly design. Apple WWDC 2024 Announcements: AI, macOS Sequoia, iOS 18 & More. A New Era of AI Apple's foray into generative AI was the centrepiece of this year’s WWDC. Branded as Apple Intelligence, this AI initiative promises to enhance user experience across the Apple ecosystem. Unlike traditional AI, which can often seem abstract and impractical, Apple Intelligence focuses on tangible benefits. For instance, smart notifications use an on-device large language model (LLM) to prioritise important alerts, cutting through the digital noise. One of the standout features is the AI’s integration across Apple's suite of apps. This allows users to generate messages, insert AI-created content into documents, and even ask Siri more specific questions with improved accuracy. Siri , in particular, has received a substantial upgrade, capable of finding specific photos on command or performing actions based on onscreen content. Moreover, the new 'Type to Siri' function is a boon in noisy environments, enabling interaction through text by simply double-tapping the iPhone’s bottom.   macOS 15 Sequoia: Enhanced Integration and Security Named Sequoia , the 15th iteration of macOS brings several noteworthy features. Among them is the ability to mirror iPhone screens on Mac desktops , echoing a similar function in Windows 11. This mirroring is more than just screen sharing; it enables seamless file transfers and collaborative editing between devices, particularly beneficial for content creators using Final Cut Pro. macOS Sequoia also sees the transformation of Keychain into a comprehensive password manager, ensuring users can generate and securely store passwords across all Apple platforms. Safari , Apple’s web browser, has also been updated with a viewer setting that highlights videos on any page and a new feature to summarise articles quickly. iOS 18: Personalisation and Security iOS 18 brings a level of customisation previously unseen on iPhones. Users can now rearrange app icons on the home screen and extend dark mode to change app icon colours , a nod to Android’s long-standing customisability. The Control Center has been enhanced with smart device controls , thanks to a new API that allows any Smart Home device to be managed through it. Security is a significant focus in iOS 18, with features like FaceID lock for individual apps , ensuring that even if your phone is borrowed, your private data remains secure. Additionally, the updated Bluetooth protocol now requires permission to connect to other devices, further bolstering security. Messages on iOS 18 now support satellite communication , ensuring messages are sent even without a traditional connection, maintaining end-to-end encryption . The Photos app has been redesigned for better organisation , introducing a single view with a filter button to sort through screenshots and downloads efficiently. iPadOS 18: Catching Up with Basics and More Mirroring many iOS 18 features, iPadOS 18 includes a long-awaited addition: a native calculator app . This basic yet essential tool has finally made its way to iPads, much to the delight of users. visionOS 2: Expanding the Spatial Computing Experience The Vision Pro’s operating system, visionOS 2 , has been enhanced to support spatial photos , which use machine learning to transform regular photos into 3D images. This update also introduces a live share mode , enabling real-time sharing of these spatial images. Moreover, visionOS 2 provides more display size options for Mac, supporting ultrawide virtual displays. watchOS 11: Elevating Health and Fitness watchOS 11 introduces features aimed at improving fitness tracking and health monitoring. The new activity load feature helps fine-tune workout recommendations by rating the effort of exercises. It also includes a Vitals app that monitors key health metrics over time, alerting users to significant changes and potential health issues. Enhanced menstrual cycle tracking offers deeper insights into irregularities, providing a more comprehensive health overview.   In-Depth Look at Other Announcements: Password Management with Passwords: Apple’s iCloud Keychain has been rebranded and expanded into a standalone app called Passwords. This app now includes capabilities such as storing Wi-Fi passwords, app passwords, Passkeys, shared passwords, and verification codes , extending its functionality across iPhones, iPads, Vision Pro goggles, and Windows. tvOS Enhancements: The Apple TV app introduces InSight , allowing users to access cast information and content trivia directly within the app, akin to Amazon Prime’s X-Ray feature. Support for 21:9 aspect ratio projectors and enhanced audio features were also announced. AirPods Gestures: AirPods now recognise gestures such as head nods for affirmative responses, making interaction even more seamless. Apple TV+ Content: Apple announced a slate of new shows and movies for Apple TV+, including ‘The Instigators’ , ‘Dark Matter’ , and new seasons of popular series like ‘Severance’ . A Glimpse into the Future Apple’s strategy to integrate AI deeply into its ecosystem is both ambitious and meticulously planned. By prioritising on-device processing and privacy, Apple is setting a new standard for AI applications in consumer technology. The updates across macOS, iOS, iPadOS, visionOS, and watchOS reflect Apple’s commitment to enhancing user experience while maintaining security and privacy at the forefront. As Apple fans eagerly await these updates, it’s clear that the Apple WWDC 2024 Announcements: AI, macOS Sequoia, iOS 18, etc. have set the stage for a transformative year in Apple’s technological journey. With Apple Intelligence leading the charge, users can look forward to a smarter and more intuitive interaction with their devices, heralding a new era of personalised technology. Here’s to a secure and innovative future! Written By: Marcella Frattari is the Digital Communications Manager at SmartViser, primarily responsible for ViserMark content creation and social media management. She holds a journalism background and is pursuing a master's degree in digital communications and marketing. Marcella brings a dynamic and creative approach to her work, consistently striving to enhance the company's online presence and engagement. Press Contact: Debbie Bouffler: Contact@visermark.com   Never miss out on our FREE Smartphone Reviews. Add  your email below to sign up   for  our monthly newsletter ,   which provides   all the latest mobile phones that ViserMark has   tried  and tested. No pressure; you can unsubscribe anytime,  and we promise not to fill up your inbox.

SMARTPHONE TIER: ENTRY TIER Battery Capacity mAh: 5000 Motorola Moto G24 Smartphone Review: Ultimate Power and Efficiency for Everyday Use Smartphone Battery Performance Based on Price: Entry Tier (€0-€199) Ranking #1 Video Review What you need to know about the Motorola Moto G24 Quick Summary The Motorola Moto G24, launched in January 2024, is a budget-friendly smartphone that combines essential features with an unbeatable battery life at an affordable price between €0-€199. This makes it a smart choice for budget-conscious consumers, offering a great deal without compromising quality. As an Entry Tier smartphone, it has been designed to cater to a wide range of users and promises a balanced blend of performance, functionality, and user experience. Here's an overview: Camera Quality: The Motorola Moto G24's camera system is a standout feature. It boasts a 50MP primary sensor that delivers impressive performance in well-lit conditions. The 2MP secondary sensor supports depth effects, adding a professional touch to your photos. The 8MP front camera is perfect for selfies and video calls, although its low-light performance is average, which is typical for this price range. Battery Life: The 5000mAh battery is a highlight, capable of lasting over two days of use or if translated into hours an impressive 61 hours on a single charge with moderate use. The 15W wired charging is efficient, ensuring the smartphone can be quickly recharged. User Experience: Running on Android 14, the Motorola Moto G24 offers a near-stock Android experience, ensuring not just smooth, but efficient performance without bloatware. The MediaTek Helio G85 processor handles everyday tasks and moderate gaming with ease, giving you the confidence that it can keep up with your needs. The 90Hz display refresh rate enhances the user experience by providing fluid visuals. Specification Overview - Released Date: January 2024 Body: 163.5 x 74.5 x 8 mm or 6.44 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches. Weight 181g. Display: 6.56 inches, with 720 x 1612 pixels resolution, 90Hz refresh rate Protection: Plastic back and frame with Glass Front and water resistance. Operating System: Android 14 Chipset: Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85, Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.7 GHz Cortex-A55) Memory: 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 4GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM. Expandable memory available: 1TB via microSD card Connectivity: Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band.  Bluetooth 5.0, Dual SIM; Stereo speakers - Yes, 3.5 Headphone jack: Yes Rear Camera: 50 MP, f/1.8 (wide): 2 MP, f/2.4, LED flash, HDR Front Camera: MP, f/2.0, (wide) Video: Front camera: 1080p@30fps, Rear camera: 1080p@30fps Battery: 5000 mAh, 15W wired Colour: Matte Charcoal, Ice Green, Blueberry, Pink Lavender Pricing Motorola Moto G24 These prices are the best from our Affiliate Partners. As an Amazon Associate, we may earn commissions from qualifying purchases from Amazon.com. You can learn more about our disclosure policy here. Smartphone Battery Performance - FULL REVIEW ViserMark offers a comprehensive range of battery performance test results based on different criteria and benchmarks for evaluating a smartphone's performance. Our tests are performed using the strictest protocol in a controlled environment to ensure repetition and consistency powered by SmartViser's test automation solution viSer. VWS Analytics Studio is a complementary product to the viSer Test Automation solution and provides an enhanced viSer user experience. It is the fastest way to analyse and view smartphone test results. We have used the interactive dashboard to show you the recent test results for the Motorola Moto G24 and comparative smartphones. Motorola Moto G24 ViserMark Labels ViserMark's Battery Performance review is based on the smartphone battery performance results obtained during testing. The ViserMark labels provide valuable insights into the Motorola Moto G24's battery performance. Reading this review, you can find a full breakdown of our battery performance results in these sections. Battery Performance Score Battery Life Battery Consumption Battery Efficiency Annual Energy Consumption Also of Interest: ViserMark Labels 1. Battery Performance What is the Motorola Moto G24 Performance Score? The Motorola Moto G24 achieved a ViserMark Battery Performance score of 55 out of 100. How does the Motorola Moto G24 compare to Entry Tier smartphones? The Motorola Moto G24 leads with a performance score of 55, closely followed by the Xiaomi Redmi 13C at 52, and the Xiaomi Redmi A3 trailing at 39. This indicates that the Moto G24 offers the best overall battery performance among the three, making it the top choice for users seeking efficient battery use in the entry-tier segment. A high-performance score signifies its superior battery optimisation and efficient energy management. The high score is likely a result of efficient power management, optimised hardware and software integration, and intelligent charging algorithms. Users can expect a seamless experience with fewer interruptions for charging and providing reassurance of uninterrupted usage is a key advantage of the Moto G24. The Xiaomi Redmi 13C has a competitive Performance Score of 52. Although this score is slightly lower than the Moto G24, suggesting good energy management and balanced performance. It offers reliable battery life, making it suitable for moderate to heavy users. The Xiaomi Redmi A3 has a performance score of 39, indicating potential battery performance issues such as less efficient power management, longer charging times, and shorter periods of active use. This could inconvenience power users and lead to faster battery degradation over time. The battery performance scores provide valuable insights into comparable smartphones' efficiency and overall energy management. The Motorola Moto G24 stands out with its top score, indicating superior battery performance and efficient power management. The Xiaomi Redmi 13C offers competitive performance, making it a strong contender in the entry-tier market. In contrast, the Xiaomi Redmi A3, with its lower score, highlights areas where improvements could enhance user experience and battery efficiency. These scores are critical for users looking to prioritize battery life and efficiency in their smartphone choices. Also of Interest: Have you missed this smartphone review? Samsung Galaxy A35 5G Review: Unveiling an Affordable and Feature-Rich Smartphone All smartphones are thoroughly tested and verified by SmartViser. Every smartphone has a review written by ViserMark, which provides all the battery performance test results translated into ViserMark Labels. Also of Interest: Top Ten Best Performing Smartphone 2. Battery Life How long will the Motorola Moto G24 battery last? The Motorola Moto G24 test results indicate an awe-inspiring battery life of 2.5 days, or 61 hours, on a single charge. How does the Motorola Moto G24 compare to Entry Tier smartphones? Offering an exceptional battery life, lasting 2.5 days or 61 hours on a single charge, the Motorola Moto G24 is an ideal choice for heavy users without needing to be recharged. The extended battery life from effective power management balances performance and energy efficiency, making it a smartphone reliable for various scenarios, including travel, long workdays, and extensive media consumption. It is positioned as the best option for users prioritising battery longevity and is suitable for professional and personal use. The Xiaomi Redmi 13C offers an impressive 57 hours of battery life on a single charge, making it a strong contender in the Entry Tier market. It provides reliable performance for moderate to heavy users who seek a balance between performance and convenience. While slightly less versatile than the Motorola Moto G24, it is an option for users looking for good battery performance without the premium price tag. The Xiaomi Redmi A3 has a shorter battery life of 44 hours, which may require daily charging and is better suited for users with lighter usage patterns or ready access to charging. It is positioned as an Entry Tier option with a lower battery life, making it suitable for users with minimal battery demands. In summary, the Motorola Moto G24 is the most capable phone for users, prioritising extended battery life and minimal charging interruptions. The Redmi 13C offers intense competition with reliable battery performance, while the Redmi A3 is best suited for users with lighter battery demands. These insights are crucial for consumers to make informed decisions based on their specific battery usage needs. 3. NEW Battery Consumption Motorola Moto G24 battery review with viSer and VWS Analytics Studio The Motorola Moto G24 battery life details, as analysed using SmartViser's viSer and VWS Analytics Studio, provide a technical and detailed perspective on the smartphone's battery consumption. The platform's capability to monitor and access real-time test results explains how the Motorola Moto G24 manages power under various daily user tasks. ViserMark can identify the strengths and weaknesses of smartphones by comparing battery usage across similar devices, enabling potential buyers to choose the best smartphone based on their usage patterns. The test results comparing the Motorola Moto G24 with the average Entry Tier (€0-€199) smartphone provide a detailed look at the most compelling aspects of its battery capabilities across various everyday activities. Battery Consumption Results provided by viSer developed SmartViser. The Motorola Moto G24 stands out with its unique battery consumption levels for various activities, deviating from the Entry Tier averages. It exhibits higher battery usage for social media and gaming but showcases superior efficiency for outgoing calls and MMS. Also, it demonstrates efficiency enhancements in camera use, such as longer recording times and quicker focus, YouTube with faster video loading, email with extended syncing intervals, media player with optimised playback, SMS with reduced power consumption during idle periods, and web browsing with lower data usage. Implications for Users: Heavy Social Media and Gaming Users: The Motorola Moto G24 may have higher battery consumption for social media and gaming. General Users: The Motorola Moto G24 is a reliable choice for daily use, offering excellent efficiency and longer battery life. Professional and Multimedia Users: The Motorola Moto G24's efficiency in handling calls, camera use, and media playback makes it a strong contender for professionals and multimedia enthusiasts. Analysing Battery Efficiency: Motorola Moto G24 vs Xiaomi Redmi 13C Smartphone Comparison In this section, we analyse and compare the battery consumption of the Motorola Moto G24 with the Xiaomi Redmi 13C across various activities. By examining key metrics such as social media use, outgoing calls, gaming, and web browsing, we aim to highlight the most interesting observations and trends. Battery Consumption Results provided by viSer developed SmartViser. The Motorola Moto G24 is generally efficient for most activities but consumes a higher gaming battery than the Redmi 13C. This indicates that the Redmi 13C may be better optimised for gaming. Regarding activity-specific consumption, the Moto G24 requires less battery for social media, outgoing calls, MMS, camera use, YouTube, email, media player, SMS, and web browsing than the Redmi 13C. Overall, the Motorola Moto G24 delivers efficient battery performance across various activities, making it a reliable choice for most users. While it consumes more battery for gaming, its overall efficiency in other key functions positions it as a strong contender in the Entry Tier smartphone market. Analysing Battery Efficiency: Motorola Moto G24 vs Xiaomi Redmi A3 Smartphone Comparison Now we can compare the battery consumption of the Motorola Moto G24 with the Xiaomi Redmi A3 across various activities. This comparison provides valuable insights into these similar Entry Tier smartphones, helping users make informed decisions based on usage. Battery Consumption Results provided by viSer developed SmartViser. The Motorola Moto G24 demonstrates higher efficiency across varied daily activities including social media, outgoing calls, MMS, camera use, YouTube, email, media player, SMS, and web browsing, consuming less battery than the Xiaomi Redmi A3. Also, it shows higher efficiency in gaming, both smartphones consume a significant amount of power in this activity, indicating that gaming remains a demanding task on battery life. The Xiaomi Redmi A3 provides basic performance for an Entry Tier smartphone but lags in efficiency compared to the Motorola Moto G24. It is ideal for users with lighter usage patterns or those prioritising initial cost over battery efficiency. In conclusion, the Motorola Moto G24 is a more efficient and longer-lasting device than the Xiaomi Redmi A3, making it a better choice for a wide range of users seeking reliable battery performance. Analysing Battery Efficiency: Motorola Moto G24 Smartphone Comparison Comparing the battery performance of the Motorola Moto G24, Xiaomi Redmi 13C, and Xiaomi Redmi A3, we can identify specific trends and insights based on their consumption rates across different activities. We also benchmark these phones against the average battery consumption of Entry Tier smartphones. This comparison's key findings and insights provide a clear overview of each smartphone's efficiency and performance. Battery Consumption Results provided by viSer developed SmartViser. Once again, the Motorola Moto G24 consistently demonstrates superior efficiency in most activities, such as social media, outgoing calls, MMS, camera use, YouTube, email, media playback, SMS, and web browsing. The Xiaomi Redmi 13C performs well but is less efficient than the Motorola Moto G24 in many activities, although it excels in gaming battery efficiency. The Redmi A3 generally consumes more battery across all activities compared to the Moto G24 and Redmi 13C, often exceeding the entry-tier average consumption. Gaming remains a power-intensive activity for all smartphones. The Xiaomi Redmi 13C is the most efficient for gaming, while the Motorola Moto G24 and Xiaomi Redmi A3 consume more power. The Motorola Moto G24 is particularly efficient in multimedia tasks (camera, YouTube, media player) and communication activities (calls, SMS, email), making it a strong choice for users who prioritise these daily activities. With the longest overall battery life, the Motorola Moto G24 shows consistent efficiency across various activities. It is ideal for heavy users, social media enthusiasts, multimedia users, and those needing long battery life and efficient performance. The benchmark is a baseline for comparing battery efficiency and consumption across various activities. From the chart, the Motorola Moto G24 generally outperforms the Entry Tier average. The Xiaomi Redmi 13C provides competitive overall battery life, excellent gaming efficiency, and good performance across multiple activities, making it suitable for users seeking balanced performance and those interested in gaming efficiency. The benchmark also shows that the Redmi 13C outperforms the Entry Tier average. The Xiaomi Redmi A3 delivers basic performance for an Entry Tier phone but is generally less efficient than the Motorola Moto G24 and Xiaomi Redmi 13C. It is ideal for users with lighter usage patterns or those prioritising initial cost over battery efficiency. The benchmark indicates that the Xiaomi Redmi A3 often exceeds average consumption. In conclusion, the Motorola Moto G24 is the most efficient and longer-lasting device compared to the Xiaomi Redmi 13C and Redmi A3, making it the best choice for users seeking reliable battery performance. The Xiaomi Redmi 13C offers competitive performance focusing on gaming efficiency, while the Redmi A3 is more suited for primary use with less demanding battery needs. 4. Power Efficiency What is the Battery Efficiency of the Motorola Moto G24? The battery efficiency for the Motorola Moto G24 was 2 leaf out of 5. How does the Motorola Moto G24 compare to Entry Tier smartphones? This section takes a look into the battery efficiency of three Entry Tier smartphones: the Motorola Moto G24, the Xiaomi Redmi 13C, and the Xiaomi Redmi A3. By analysing their efficiency scores, we aim to highlight how effectively each one manages its power consumption. The Motorola Moto G24 has an efficiency score of 2 out of 5, signifying advanced power management techniques that result in less energy wasted during tasks and prolonged battery life. Its efficiency allows for balanced performance and effective battery consumption, enhancing the overall user experience. Although performing well in managing battery resources and balancing power consumption, the Xiaomi Redmi 13C achieved a battery efficiency score of 1.5 out of 5.  Finally, the Xiaomi Redmi A3 has an efficiency score of 1 out of 5 indicating essential energy management and higher energy wastage than the Motorola Moto G24 and Xiaomi Redmi 13C. Also of Interest: Samsung Galaxy A35 5G Review: Unveiling an Affordable and Feature-Rich Smartphone 5. Annual Energy Consumption How much energy does the Motorola Moto G24 use? The Motorola Moto G24 has an annual energy consumption of 2.7 kWh annually. How does the Motorola Moto G24 compare to Entry Tier smartphones? Lastly, we examine the annual energy consumption of these comparative Entry Tier smartphones. By comparing their annual energy usage in kilowatt-hours (kWh), we aim to provide insights into their energy efficiency and overall cost-effectiveness. With the lowest energy consumption of 2.7kWh, the Motorola Moto G24 is the most energy-efficient. This results in lower electricity costs over time and a lower environmental impact. Users benefit from reduced energy consumption, particularly advantageous for heavy users who charge their phones frequently. The Xiaomi Redmi 13C has moderate energy consumption, balancing performance and energy use well. It is cost-effective and has a reasonable environmental impact and the Xiaomi Redmi A3 has the highest energy consumption, resulting in higher operational costs and a larger environmental footprint. VERDICT: What is it like to Use? The Motorola Moto G24 offers an impressive user experience and an exceptional battery life of 2.5 days, or 61 hours of use, making it highly reliable for users who need their phone to last through heavy usage without frequent recharges. It shows a balanced performance across a variety of activities, with particularly efficient battery consumption for social media, calls, MMS, camera use, YouTube, email, media playback, SMS, and web browsing. This balance ensures that users can rely on their smartphones for a wide range of tasks without worrying about excessive battery drain. What's in the box? Motorola Moto G24 Smartphone USB-A-to-C cable 10W charger Clear protective case SIM ejector tool User manuals Should I buy the Motorola Moto G24? An excellent choice for budget-conscious consumers seeking a reliable smartphone. Its strengths lie in its large, smooth display, outstanding battery life, and clean Android 14 interface. While it may not excel in low-light photography or offer 5G connectivity, the Motorola Moto G24 provides substantial value for everyday use, assuring you that it will meet your daily needs. This smartphone is a practical and efficient option for those who value affordability, battery life, and a seamless user experience. Extra Insights Pricing Motorola Moto G24 These prices are the best from our Affiliate Partners. As an Amazon Associate, we may earn commissions from qualifying purchases from Amazon.com. You can learn more about our disclosure policy here. VCX (Valued Camera eXperience) The VCX Forum has been working with its members on the system and infrastructure as a non-profit organisation. We strive to improve our technology to develop and exchange accurate and objective quality and performance indicators, which is our ultimate goal. We will also serve as a compass for the smartphone camera industry. We appreciate your interest in the VCX Forum. No VCX reviews are available for this smartphone. Background Motorola is a well-established and innovative technology company known for its contributions to the telecommunications industry. Founded in 1928, Motorola has a rich history of pioneering achievements, including the development of the first handheld mobile phone. Today, the company continues to produce a wide range of consumer electronics, with a focus on smartphones that offer reliable performance, innovative features, and value for money. Motorola's smartphones are known for their durability, user-friendly interfaces, and strong battery life, making them a popular choice for consumers worldwide. Get all the latest reviews. Join our readers to receive the latest update to our smartphone battery performance scores and performance reviews as soon as we finish testing! Written By Debbie Bouffler is the Marketing and Communications Manager at SmartViser. She is crucial in developing the company's communication and marketing strategies. Debbie has gained extensive experience in strategic business development and marketing in various industries, which has helped her excel in her current position. Debbie is a leader with imagination, an unmatched drive, and an infectious passion for growth and excellence, especially in the telecommunications industry. For further insights into her professional journey or to connect, visit Debbie on LinkedIn. Affiliate Disclosure: These prices are the best from our Affiliate Partners. As an Amazon Associate, we may earn commissions from qualifying purchases from Amazon.com. You can learn more about our disclosure policy here.

SMARTPHONE TIER: MID TIER Battery Capacity mAh: 5000 Samsung Galaxy A15 5G Smartphone Review: Outstanding Battery Life and Reliable Performance Smartphone Battery Performance Based on Price: Mid Tier (€200-€499) Ranking #3 Video Review What do you need to know about the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G? Quick Summary The Samsung Galaxy A15 offers a competitive battery performance score of 49 and sustains 2 days or 52 hours of use, which is amazing. Its power efficiency is good, and it benefits from a quick charging time, making it a solid choice for users who value performance and convenience, despite its slightly higher 3.1 kWh annual energy consumption. The Samsung Galaxy A15 5G is a well-rounded Mid Tier (€200-€499) smartphone, offering excellent battery life and fast charging. Its performance and efficiency make it an attractive choice for budget-conscious users seeking reliability and convenience. Specification Overview - Released Date: December 2023 Body: 160.1 x 76.8 x 8.4 mm. Weight 200g. Display: 6.50 inches Super AMOLED with 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution, 90Hz rate Protection: Plastic back and frame with Glass Front. Operating System: Android 14, One UI 6. Chipset: Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ (6 nm): Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55). Memory: 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM; microSD (Up to 1TB). Connectivity: 5G; Hybrid Dual SIM; Wi-Fi 5; BT 5.3; NFC; 3.5mm head jack Rear Camera: Main: 50 MP, f/1.8, Ultra wide angle: 5 MP, f/2.2, Marco: 2MP, f/2.4 Front Camera: 13 MP, f/2.0, (wide) Video: Front camera: 1080p@30fps, Rear camera: 1080p@30fps Battery: 5000 mAh, 25W wired Colour: Brave Black, Optimistic Blue, Magical Blue, Personality Yellow, Light Blue Pricing Samsung Galaxy A15 5G These prices are the best from our Affiliate Partners. As an Amazon Associate, we may earn commissions from qualifying purchases from Amazon.com. You can learn more about our disclosure policy here. Smartphone Battery Performance - FULL REVIEW ViserMark offers a comprehensive range of battery performance test results based on different criteria and benchmarks for evaluating a smartphone's performance. Our tests are performed using the strictest protocol in a controlled environment to ensure repetition and consistency powered by SmartViser's test automation solution viSer. VWS Analytics Studio is a complementary product to the viSer Test Automation solution and provides an enhanced viSer user experience. It is the fastest way to analyse and view smartphone test results. We have used the interactive dashboard to show you the recent test results for the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G and comparative smartphones. Samsung Galaxy A15 5G ViserMark Labels ViserMark's Battery Performance review is based on the smartphone battery performance results obtained during testing. The ViserMark labels provide valuable insights into the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G battery performance. Reading this review, you can find a full breakdown of our battery performance results in these sections. Battery Performance Score Battery Life Battery Consumption Battery Efficiency Annual Energy Consumption Also of Interest: ViserMark Labels 1. Battery Performance What is the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G Performance Score? The Samsung Galaxy A15 5G achieved a ViserMark Battery Performance score of 49 out of 100. How does the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G compare to Mid Tier smartphones? The Samsung Galaxy A15 5G excels in battery performance, as assessed through a comprehensive evaluation of various test results, including battery life, charging time, battery efficiency, and annual energy consumption. With its remarkable battery performance score of 49/100, the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G offers an impressive 52 hours (2 days) of usage on a single charge. This surpasses the Mid Tier average of 45 hours, showcasing its superior battery life. It also features a relatively fast charging time of 1 hour and 27 minutes, compared to the Mid Tier average of 1 hour and 42 minutes. While its power efficiency rating is 1.5/5, slightly below the mid-tier average of 1.83/5, the A15's annual energy consumption stands at a competitive 3.1 kWh. This suggests there is potential for power management optimisation, but it's already performing well in this aspect. In conclusion, the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G excels in battery life positioning itself as a strong contender in the Mid Tier smartphone market. Despite minor inefficiencies in power usage, it is a reliable choice for potential buyers. It was recently a contender in the ViserMark's Best Budget Smartphone for 2024 - explore the outcome. Also of Interest: Xiaomi Redmi A3 Smartphone Review - Is it the Ultimate Budget-Friendly Smartphone? All smartphones are thoroughly tested and verified by SmartViser. Every smartphone has a review written by ViserMark, which provides all the battery performance test results translated into ViserMark Labels. Also of Interest: Top Ten Best Performing Smartphone 2. Battery Life How long will the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G battery last? The Samsung Galaxy A15 5G test results indicate an awe-inspiring battery life of 2 days, or 52 hours, on a single charge. How does the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G compare to Mid Tier smartphones? The Samsung Galaxy A15 5G offers an impressive 52 hours (2 days) of usage, significantly outperforming the Mid Tier average of 46 hours. This superior battery life makes it one of the top performers in its category, appealing to users who need their phones to last longer between charges. This extended battery life benefits professionals, students, and frequent travellers. These users require a reliable device that won't run out of power during critical moments, making the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G an attractive option. Compared to competitors like the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G, which offers 39 hours (1.5 days) of usage, the Galaxy A15's battery performance is notably better. This makes it a more compelling choice for users prioritising battery life over other features. The impressive battery life also makes the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G ideal for heavy multimedia users and gamers who need sustained performance. Additionally, it benefits users in remote areas or those with inconsistent access to charging facilities, ensuring continuous connectivity. Overall, the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G's superior battery life enhances its appeal in the Mid Tier market. It becomes a preferred choice for users seeking value for money and long-lasting performance. This strength positions it as a highly competitive option, particularly for users requiring dependable battery life in their daily activities. 3. NEW Battery Consumption Samsung Galaxy A15 5G battery review with viSer and VWS Analytics Studio The Samsung Galaxy A15 5G battery life details, as analysed using SmartViser's viSer and VWS Analytics Studio, provide a technical and detailed perspective on the smartphone's battery consumption. The platform's capability to monitor and access real-time test results explains how the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G manages power under various daily user tasks. ViserMark can identify the strengths and weaknesses of smartphones by comparing battery usage across similar devices, enabling potential buyers to choose the best smartphone based on their usage patterns. The test results comparing the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G with the average Mid Tier (€200-€499) smartphone provide a detailed look at the most compelling aspects of its battery capabilities across various everyday activities. Analysing Battery Efficiency: Samsung Galaxy A15 vs the Average Mid Tier Smartphone Comparison In the Mid Tier market, the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G stands out due to its exceptional battery life. It consumes more power for social media usage, which may result in faster battery drain for social media app users and younger demographics. While it is less efficient than the Mid Tier average in file transfer activities, it still outperforms many competitors in the Mid Tier. For users who frequently transfer files, such as professionals and students, the A15 5G's performance is acceptable. Still, there is potential for further optimisation to match or exceed the Mid Tier average. One strength of the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G is its efficiency in camera usage, making it an attractive option for content creators and casual photographers who heavily rely on smartphone cameras. However, the A15 5G exhibits higher battery consumption during email and YouTube usage, which could concern business professionals and media enthusiasts. This increased consumption might impact users who heavily rely on their phones for email communication and media consumption, highlighting the need for improvements in these areas to enhance the user experience for these user groups. The Samsung Galaxy A15 5G's battery consumption is slightly higher than average for gaming and web browsing, indicating balanced performance in these activities. Casual gamers and web users are likely to find the A15 5 G's performance satisfactory, with the manageable increase in battery consumption ensuring a decent experience without significant drawbacks. Summary of Key Findings: The Samsung Galaxy A15 5G demonstrates varied battery consumption performance compared to the Mid Tier average. Its exceptional camera efficiency makes it an excellent choice for photography enthusiasts. However, higher consumption during social media, email, and YouTube usage could impact younger users and media consumers. The A15 5G's balanced gaming and web browsing performance suggests its versatility in the Mid Tier smartphone market. Optimising power management in high-consumption areas could further enhance its appeal and user satisfaction. Analysing Battery Efficiency: Samsung Galaxy A15 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G Smartphone Comparison Regarding social media usage, the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G consumes significantly less battery than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G. Although both phones consume more battery than the Mid Tier average, the A15 5G is more efficient for social media use. This could benefit younger users active on social media platforms, offering them longer usage times between charges. When comparing the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G battery consumption and the Redmi Note 13 5G, it proves slightly more efficient for outgoing calls and MMS. These differences make this smartphone a better option for users who frequently make calls or rely heavily on messaging as it ensures that their battery lasts longer during intensive communication. For gaming, the A15 5G has a lower consumption rate than the Redmi Note 13 5G. While both phones consume more battery than the Mid Tier average, Galaxy A15 5G offers better efficiency for gaming activities. This could be a significant benefit for mobile gamers who require longer play sessions without recharging frequently. Regarding camera usage, once again the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G is more efficient, however, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G performs better in media playback. So users who prioritise photography prefer the A15 5G, while those focused on media consumption lean towards the Redmi Note 13 5G. Summary of Key Findings: The Samsung Galaxy A15 5G shows better battery efficiency in social media, outgoing calls, MMS, gaming, and camera use than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G. However, the Redmi Note 13 5G is more efficient for email, YouTube, and media playback. Both phones perform efficiently for web browsing, making them suitable options for users who prioritise internet use. Overall, the Galaxy A15 5G offers a balanced performance with specific strengths in communication and gaming, while the Redmi Note 13 5G excels in media consumption and email efficiency. Analysing Battery Efficiency: Samsung Galaxy A15 vs Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Comparison The Samsung Galaxy A15 5G consumes slightly more battery for social media activities compared to the Samsung Galaxy A55 5G. This indicates that while both phones consume more than the Mid Tier average the A55 5G is slightly more efficient for social media use. This could benefit users who are highly active on social media platforms, offering them a bit more usage time between charges. For outgoing calls, the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G has a higher consumption rate than the Galaxy A55 5G. Both phones consume more battery than the Mid Tier average but the A55 5G is notably more efficient. This difference might be significant for users who frequently make calls, such as business professionals or those who use their phones for work. Also, the A15 5G consumes more battery for MMS and SMS compared to the A55 5G. This makes the Samsung Galaxy A55 5G a better option for users who rely heavily on messaging, ensuring that their battery lasts longer during heavy usage. The Samsung Galaxy A15 5G has a slightly better gaming consumption rate than the A55 5G and when it comes to camera usage, this smartphone is ideal for users who prioritise photography. However, the Samsung Galaxy A55 is more efficient for Email and YouTube making it a better option for users who frequently check emails and watch videos on YouTube. Summary of Key Findings: Compared to the Samsung Galaxy A55 5G, the A15 5G shows better battery efficiency in gaming and camera use. However, the A55 5G is more efficient for social media, outgoing calls, MMS, email, YouTube, and media playback. Additionally, the Samsung Galaxy A55 5G performs better for web browsing. Overall, the A55 5G offers a more balanced performance across most activities, making it a suitable option for users who prioritise efficient battery consumption in a wide range of everyday tasks. On the other hand, the A15 5G excels in specific areas like gaming and camera use, which could appeal to users who focus on these activities. Analysing Battery Efficiency: Samsung Galaxy A15 5G Smartphone Comparison The Samsung Galaxy A15 5G is more efficient than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G when it comes to battery consumption during social media usage, although it may use more battery than the average Mid Tier phone. This means that you can enjoy using social media without worrying too much about battery life. On the other hand, the A55 5G performs even better in this regard. The Samsung Galaxy A55 5G is the most efficient for outgoing calls, followed by the A15 5G. In contrast, the Redmi Note 13 5G is the most battery-consuming option. The A55 5G is also the most efficient for MMS, followed by the A15 5G. Unfortunately, the Redmi Note 13 5G consumes significantly more battery than both and the average. Users who rely heavily on messaging might find the A55 5G more appealing due to its efficiency. The A15 5G offers the best gaming performance among the three, although it still consumes slightly more power than the Mid Tier average. Also, it is the most efficient for camera use but less efficient for media playback than the A55 5G. The Redmi Note 13 5G consumes the most battery in both activities. The A15 5G consumes more battery for email and YouTube than the A55 5G and the Redmi Note 13 5G. The A55 5G is the most efficient for web browsing, followed by the A15 5G. The Redmi Note 13 5G consumes the most battery in this category. Summary of Key Findings: The Samsung Galaxy A15 5G has mixed battery consumption performance compared to the Mid Tier average, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G and Samsung Galaxy A55 5G. It performs well in gaming and camera efficiency but lags in social media, email, and YouTube consumption. The A55 5G consistently performs well across most activities, making it a well-rounded option. The Redmi Note 13 5G performs best in YouTube consumption, although it is less efficient overall. Prices will vary based on specific needs, with the A15 5G suitable for gamers and photographers, the A55 5G for general efficiency, and the Redmi Note 13 5G for media consumption. 4. Power Efficiency What is the Battery Efficiency of the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G? The battery efficiency for the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G was 1.5 leaf out of 5. How does the Samsung Galaxy 15 5G compare to Mid Tier smartphones? The energy efficiency of a smartphone plays a crucial role in its battery performance. The Samsung Galaxy A15 5G has a power efficiency rating of 1.5/5, slightly above the Mid Tier average of 1.08/5. This rating indicates that it performs well in terms of battery life and charging speed, but there is still potential for improving its energy consumption. The slightly lower power efficiency rating suggests room for software and hardware enhancements for better power management. Improvements could include more efficient handling of background processes, optimised app management, and resource allocation that minimises power consumption without compromising performance. Overall, the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G demonstrates impressive energy management compared to other phones, but there are opportunities for further enhancement to achieve even greater efficiency. This balance of energy consumption and performance makes this smartphone a strong contender in the Mid Tier. Also of Interest: Samsung Galaxy A35 5G Review: Unveiling an Affordable and Feature-Rich Smartphone 5. Annual Energy Consumption How much energy does the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G use? The Samsung Galaxy A15 5G has an annual energy consumption of 3.1 kWh. How does the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G compare to Mid Tier smartphones? The Samsung Galaxy A15 5G has an annual energy consumption of 3.1 kWh. This rating reflects the total energy used by the smartphone over a year, taking into account typical usage patterns and charging habits. With an annual energy consumption of 4.2 kWh, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G is less energy-efficient compared to the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G, which has a lower annual energy consumption of 3.1 kWh despite a moderate power efficiency rating of 1.5/5. This indicates effective energy management, resulting in better battery life, faster charging, and reduced power consumption. Ultimately, this leads to lower electricity costs and a smaller environmental impact. The relatively lower annual energy consumption of the A15 5G highlights Samsung's efforts to optimise their smartphones for better energy efficiency, making it a suitable choice for users who prioritise functionality and environmental sustainability in the Mid Tier smartphone market. VERDICT: What is it like to Use? This smartphone delivers exceptional battery performance, providing up to two days of use or 52 hours per charge, earning a score of 49 out of 100 in ViserMark's Mid Tier. It boasts a Super AMOLED display that ensures vibrant visuals and is equipped with a multi-lens camera setup for versatile photography options. Running on Android and enhanced with Samsung’s One UI, the phone seamlessly integrates everyday app functionality with robust security features through Samsung Knox. Additional conveniences include fast charging and water resistance, making it a well-rounded choice for daily use. What's in the box? Samsung Galaxy Smartphone USB-A-to-C cable Should I buy the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G? Deciding whether to buy the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G depends on your specific needs and preferences. There are several key points to consider based on the detailed analysis of its battery performance and comparisons with other Mid Tier smartphones: Battery Life: The A15 5G offers an excellent battery life of 52 hours (2 days), which is higher than the Mid Tier average. This makes it a reliable choice for users who need their phones to last longer between charges. Gaming Efficiency: This smartphone performs well in gaming, consuming less battery compared to other Mid Tier smartphones. If you are a mobile gamer, this could be a significant advantage. Camera Usage: Having more efficiency in camera use, makes it a great choice for photography enthusiasts who need to conserve battery while capturing photos and videos. File Transfer: It performs adequately in file transfer activities, better than many individual competitors in the Mid Tier. The Samsung Galaxy A15 5G is a well-rounded Mid Tier smartphone with battery life, gaming, and camera efficiency strengths. However, it has higher battery consumption for social media, email, and media playback. Weighing these factors against your specific needs and usage patterns will help you determine if the A15 5G is the right choice. The Samsung Galaxy A55 5G is a better option if you value overall efficiency in various activities. Extra Insights Pricing Samsung Galaxy A15 5G These prices are the best from our Affiliate Partners. As an Amazon Associate, we may earn commissions from qualifying purchases from Amazon.com. You can learn more about our disclosure policy here. VCX (Valued Camera eXperience) The VCX Forum has been working with its members on the system and infrastructure as a non-profit organisation. We strive to improve our technology to develop and exchange accurate and objective quality and performance indicators, which is our ultimate goal. We will also serve as a compass for the smartphone camera industry. We appreciate your interest in the VCX Forum. No VCX reviews are available for this smartphone. Background The Samsung Group is a South Korean multinational conglomerate headquartered in Samsung Town, Seoul. It comprises numerous affiliated businesses, most united under the Samsung brand. Samsung Electronics has assembly plants and sales networks in 74 countries and employs around 290,000 people. Samsung is a major manufacturer of electronic components such as lithium-ion batteries, semiconductors, image sensors, camera modules and displays for clients such as Apple, Sony, HTC and Nokia. Get all the latest reviews. Join our readers to receive the latest update to our smartphone battery performance scores and performance reviews as soon as we finish testing! If you are a Smartphone Manufacturer looking to improve your smartphone's battery Performance, don't hesitate to contact us to discuss how we can help you. Written By Debbie Bouffler is the Marketing and Communications Manager at SmartViser. She plays a crucial role in developing communication and marketing strategies for the company. Debbie has gained extensive experience in strategic business development and marketing in various industries, which has helped her excel in her current position at SmartViser. Debbie is a leader with imagination, an unmatched drive, and an infectious passion for growth and excellence, especially in the telecommunications industry. For further insights into her professional journey or to connect, visit Debbie on LinkedIn. Affiliate Disclosure: These prices are the best from our Affiliate Partners. As an Amazon Associate, we may earn commissions from qualifying purchases from Amazon.com. You can learn more about our disclosure policy here.

As we delve into the competitive world of budget smartphones for 2024, battery life remains a pivotal factor for consumers juggling cost and functionality. This year, we turn our focus to notable contenders like the Samsung Galaxy A15 , Motorola Moto G24 , Xiaomi Redmi A3 , Xiaomi Redmi 13C , and Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G —all boasting a hefty 5000mAh battery capacity. This means they can all store the same amount of electrical energy. Although they share this spec, actual battery life can vary based on how each phone's hardware and software manage power. So, while they all promise extensive usage times, your experience might differ depending on your chosen smartphone. The best performer will depend on how each brand has fine-tuned its device. Best Budget Smartphone ViserMark’s extensive testing provides a clear snapshot of each model's battery performance, shedding light on their battery life, efficiency and consumption in real-world scenarios. Our analysis identified the best-performing smartphone and offered crucial insights for those looking to get the most out of their smartphone investment without breaking the bank.   Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G - from 199,90€   It raises the bar for Mid Tier smartphones by delivering robust battery performance, supporting 33W fast charging to ensure over two days of usage. This model sports a 6.67-inch AMOLED display, encased in a flat plastic frame with a glossy finish for aesthetic appeal and is IP54 rated for dust and splash resistance. It doesn't fall short on multimedia needs either, equipped with a 108MP main camera and stereo speakers. The device runs on Android 13 with MIUI 14, offering comprehensive connectivity options including dual-band Wi-Fi, Bluetooth 5.1, NFC, and USB Type-C, with a ViserMark battery performance score of 48 out of 100. Xiaomi Redmi 13C - 159,90€ It stands out with a ViserMark score of 52 within the Entry Tier, suggesting superior battery management of 2.5 days of use. Its design is pragmatic with a moderate display size and budget-conscious hardware capable of handling basic tasks and light gaming. The Redmi 13C, running MIUI 14 based on Android 13, is designed with entry-level users in mind, emphasising usability and cost-effectiveness. Xiaomi Redmi A3 - 129,90€   This smartphone represents the more economical spectrum within the Entry Tier, focusing on basic functionality suitable for users with minimal demands. It ranks lower in performance and efficiency, reflecting its focus on cost reduction. Despite the lower rank in battery performance, it maintains the use of MIUI, which may include pre-installed apps and ads, potentially affecting the user experience. Motorola Moto G24 - 149,00€ The Moto G24 excels in the Entry Tier with a ViserMark battery performance score of 55 out of 100, indicating efficient power management. It offers a remarkable 61 hours of battery life on a single charge. The device features a 6.56-inch display with a 90Hz refresh rate, ensuring smooth visual performance. Equipped with a 50MP primary camera and running Android 14 powered by the MediaTek Helio G85 processor, it can handle daily tasks and moderate gaming. Additional features include dual SIM support, a 3.5mm headphone jack, and up to 1TB of expandable memory via microSD card, making it highly versatile. Samsung Galaxy A15  - 199,00€ This device delivers exceptional battery performance, providing up to two days of use or 52 hours per charge, earning a score of 49 out of 100 in ViserMark's Mid Tier. It boasts a Super AMOLED display that ensures vibrant visuals and is equipped with a multi-lens camera setup for versatile photography options. Running on Android and enhanced with Samsung’s One UI, the device seamlessly integrates everyday app functionality with robust security features through Samsung Knox. Additional conveniences include fast charging and water resistance, making it a well-rounded choice for daily use. These prices are the best from our Affiliate Partners. As an Amazon Associate, we may earn commissions from qualifying purchases from Amazon.com . You can learn more about our disclosure policy here . In the chart below the Motorola Moto G24  excels in energy efficiency across the board, demonstrating low current consumption in activities like social media, web browsing, and communication, making it ideal for users who value long battery life for everyday tasks. The Samsung Galaxy A15  performs strongly in camera and YouTube browsing, suggesting it's well-suited for users who engage heavily in these areas without frequent recharges. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G  handles gaming and media player activities efficiently, perfect for gaming enthusiasts and video viewers. Meanwhile, the Xiaomi Redmi 13C   is a well-rounded performer with efficient gaming and general application capabilities, making it a versatile option for a wide range of activities . Lastly, the Xiaomi Redmi A3 , despite its higher power consumption in some areas, still offers solid performance in web browsing and media player, aligning well with the needs of casual users looking for an economical smartphone option. Battery Consumption Results provided by viSer  developed Smart V iser Larger screens, like those on the Redmi 13C (6.74 inches), the Redmi A3 (6.71) and the Redmi Note 13 4G (6.67 inches), generally result in higher battery consumption due to the increased area that needs to be illuminated, especially during activities such as camera and YouTube browsing. In contrast, smaller screens, such as the Galaxy A15 (6.4 inches) and Motorola Moto G24 (6.56 inches), naturally draw less power, contributing to better battery life overall. Comparing the display technologies, the Redmi Note 13 4G and Samsung Galaxy A15 use AMOLED and Super AMOLED screens, respectively, which are known for their power efficiency when displaying dark content due to their ability to turn off individual pixels. However, these screens can consume more power with bright, colourful visuals. On the other hand, the Redmi 13C, Redmi A3, and Moto G24 use LCD technology, which typically consumes more power overall, especially when displaying bright or white backgrounds. The Motorola Moto G24 's 90Hz refresh rate offers smoother visuals but increases power consumption compared to standard 60Hz screens. Effective optimisation helps mitigate these effects, balancing performance and battery life. For instance, the device can dynamically switch between 90Hz and 60Hz depending on the activity, conserving battery life when higher refresh rates are unnecessary. Additionally, the Moto G24 utilises RAM Boost, which temporarily converts storage into virtual RAM, enhancing multitasking efficiency and reducing strain on the processor, indirectly improving battery performance. The device also incorporates a power-efficient octa-core processor and software optimisations within the Android 14 operating system, such as adaptive battery management and background activity control, further extending battery life. Moreover, the Moto G24 includes Auto Night Vision, an AI-driven feature that optimises camera settings based on ambient lighting conditions to enhance low-light performance without significantly draining the battery. The device also benefits from a clean, almost stock version of Android, avoiding the additional battery drain often caused by heavy manufacturer skins and bloatware. Battery Consumption Results provided by viSer  developed Smart V iser Analysing the chart above, the comparison between the Entry Tier average and the Moto G24 , Redmi 13C , and Redmi A3 , which belong to the Entry Tier models, shows that the Motorola Moto G24 stands out for its exceptional energy efficiency, consistently using less power across all activities compared to the average. This efficiency makes it ideal for extended use without frequent recharging. The Redmi Note A3 and Redmi 13C generally align with the Entry Tier average, indicating typical power consumption for its class. The Xiaomi models consume more power, particularly in social media browsing and emailing. Battery Consumption Results provided by viSer  developed Smart V iser Both in the Mid Tier , the Redmi Note 13 4G   and Galaxy A15 generally demonstrate higher current consumption than the Mid Tier average, indicating inferior energy efficiency but superior features at the cost of higher battery usage . The Galaxy A15 excels in data-intensive tasks like downloads and uploads, suggesting it is optimised for such high-demand activities. Meanwhile, the Redmi Note 13 4G performs efficiently in gaming and media player, making it suitable for users who frequently engage in these activities. For multimedia use, including camera and YouTube, the Galaxy A15 shows better energy management compared to the Redmi Note 13 4G. Battery Consumption Results provided by viSer  developed Smart V iser When evaluating the budget smartphones based on ViserMark's battery performance test results, the Motorola Moto G24 emerges as the top performer. It leads with the highest battery performance score of 55, offers the longest battery life at 2.5 days or 61 hours, and boasts the best power efficiency rating. Its efficient power management and lower annual energy consumption of 2.7 kWh further underscore its superiority, making it an ideal choice for users seeking prolonged battery life and efficient energy use. The Xiaomi Redmi 13C also stands out with a strong battery performance score of 52, matching the G24 with 2.5 days of battery life or 57 hours of use. It maintains good power efficiency and relatively low 2.8 kWh annual energy consumption, positioning it as a strong contender for budget-conscious users who still demand good battery performance. The Samsung Galaxy A15 offers a competitive battery performance score of 49 and sustains 2 days or 52 hours of use, which is respectable. Its power efficiency is good, and it benefits from a quick charging time, making it a solid choice for users who value performance and convenience, despite its slightly higher 3.1 kWh annual energy consumption. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G scores 48 in battery performance and provides 2 days or 51 hours of battery life. It charges the fastest among the group, thanks to its 33W fast charging support, but its power efficiency is lower, reflected in a higher annual energy consumption of 3.2 kWh. Finally, the Xiaomi Redmi A3 has the lowest battery performance score of 39, offering only 1.5 days or 44 hours of battery life. Its power efficiency is the least favourable, and it has the highest annual energy consumption at 3.7 kWh, making it less suitable for users who prioritise battery life and efficiency. Battery Consumption Results provided by viSer  developed Smart V iser The Motorola Moto G24  excels in all test results, demonstrating exceptional battery performance, life, efficiency, and lower energy consumption, making it the standout choice. The Xiaomi Redmi 13C  also performs well, surpassing the average in most categories, making it a strong contender for users seeking good battery performance in the Entry Tier. Conversely, the Xiaomi Redmi A3  falls short in most results compared to the average, indicating it may not be the best option for users prioritising battery efficiency and performance. Analysing the chart below, the Samsung Galaxy A15  and Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G  outperform the Mid Tier average in various aspects. The Galaxy A15 shows superior battery performance, life, and efficiency, making it an excellent choice for users seeking reliable battery management. The Redmi Note 13 4G also demonstrates strong battery life and the fastest charging time, offering a balanced option for users. Battery Consumption Results provided by viSer  developed Smart V iser Conclusion ViserMark’s extensive testing highlights the Motorola Moto G24 as the best battery-performant budget smartphone, with a leading battery performance score and exceptional efficiency, making it ideal for users needing long-lasting power. The Xiaomi Redmi 13C also has an impressive battery life and efficiency, offering great value for budget-conscious consumers. The Samsung Galaxy A15, while slightly less efficient, provides robust performance and fast charging capabilities, making it a solid choice for users who value convenience and multimedia capabilities. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G, with its fast charging and balanced performance in gaming and media, appeals to users with specific multimedia needs. However, the Xiaomi Redmi A3 falls short in efficiency and battery life, making it less suitable for those prioritising these aspects. Written By: Marcella Frattari is the Digital Communications Manager at SmartViser, primarily responsible for ViserMark content creation and social media management. She holds a journalism background and is pursuing a master's degree in digital communications and marketing. Marcella brings a dynamic and creative approach to her work, consistently striving to enhance the company's online presence and engagement. Press Contact: Debbie Bouffler: Contact@visermark.com   Never miss out on our FREE Smartphone Reviews. Add  your email below to sign up   for  our monthly newsletter ,   which provides   all the latest mobile phones that ViserMark has   tried  and tested. No pressure; you can unsubscribe anytime,  and we promise not to fill up your inbox.