top of page
  • Debbie Bouffler

Logicom Luma Smartphone Review

Updated: 5 days ago

SMARTPHONE TIER: ENTRY TIER

Battery Capacity mAh: 5000



Logicom Luma Smartphone Review:

A Compact and Efficient Smartphone

 

Smartphone Battery Performance

ViserMark Labels for the Logicom Luma smartphone

Based on Price:

Entry Tier (€0-€199) 

Ranking #19




Video Review

A graphic showing the Logicom Luma smartphone with a picture of a man who is doing a video review
 

What do you need to know about the Logicome Luma?


Quick Summary

The Logicom Luma smartphone is an Entry Tier smartphone (€0-€199), designed to meet basic smartphone needs at an affordable price. Its compact and lightweight design makes it easy to handle and fits comfortably in pockets or small bags. The phone features a modest display and a plastic build, prioritising cost-effectiveness over premium materials and high-definition visuals.


Equipped with a 1.6 GHz Octa-Core processor and minimal 4GB RAM, the Logicom Luma is best suited for light usage, such as texting, browsing, and social media. Its battery life typically lasts 1.5 days on a single charge with regular use. The camera setup is simple, making it suitable for casual photography but not for those seeking high-quality photos. The phone runs on a simplified version of Android 13, ensuring a user-friendly experience optimised for its hardware capabilities.


The Logicom Luma is appealing due to its affordability, making it an ideal choice for budget-conscious users or as a secondary mobile phone. Although it may lack advanced features and robust performance and charges slowly, it still provides essential smartphone functionality at a fraction of the cost of Flagship/Pro smartphones.


 

Specification Overview - Released Date: August 2023


  • Body: 160.5 x 70 x 9.4 mm, weight 229g

  • Display: LCD IPS Colour 6.82 inch screen with 720 x 1640 pixels resolution

  • Operating System: Android 13

  • Chipset: 1.6 GHz Octa-Core. Nano Sim, Nano Sim

  • Memory: 128GB 4GB RAM

  • Connectivity: Wi-Fi 802.11a/b/g/n. Bluetooth: Yes. Micro-USB: Yes. 3.5mm Jack: Yes

  • Cameras: Main: 16 MP with LED flash, digital zoom, and autofocus. Also, includes a 5 MP wide-angle camera and a 2 MP camera.

  • Video: 720 x 1080 px

  • Battery: 5000 mAh

  • Colour: Black


Good Points

Not-so-Good Points

  • Compact and practical design

  • Slow charging

  • Good battery life - 1.5 days of use

  • Limited on storage

  • Affordable mobile phone

  • Android 13 and 4G connectivity

  • Guaranteed for 2 years

  • No IP ratings

  • Basic 3-camera set-up


  

A button displaying device specifications with a link to the Logicom Lum smartphone  technical information
 

Pricing and Availability


A graphic of the Logicom Luma mobile phone
German Amazon Logo
French Amazon Logo
English Amazon Logo




These prices are the best from our Affiliate Partners. As an Amazon Associate, we may earn commissions from qualifying purchases from Amazon.com. You can learn more about our disclosure policy here.

 

Smartphone Battery Performance - FULL REVIEW


ViserMark offers a comprehensive range of battery performance test results based on different criteria and benchmarks for evaluating a smartphone's performance. Our tests are performed using the strictest protocol in a controlled environment to ensure repetition and consistency powered by SmartViser's test automation solution viSer.

 

VWS Analytics Studio is a complementary product to the viSer Test Automation solution and provides an enhanced viSer user experience. It is the fastest way to analyse and view smartphone test results. We have used the interactive dashboard to show you the recent test results for the Logicom Luma and comparative smartphones.

 


 







 

Logicom Luma ViserMark Labels


ViserMark's Battery Performance review is based on the smartphone battery performance results obtained during testing. The ViserMark labels provide valuable insights into the Logicom Luma battery performance.

ViserMark Labels for the Logicom Luma smartphone

Reading this review, you can find a full breakdown of our battery performance results in these sections.







Also of Interest: ViserMark Labels


 

1. Battery Performance


What is the Logicom Luma Performance Score?

ViserMark Label for Battery Performance showing 31/100 for the Logicom Luma smartphone

The Logicom Luma achieved a ViserMark Battery Performance score of 31 out of 100.




The graph below illustrates the battery performance scores of the Logicom Luma compared to other Entry Tier smartphones. The Logicom Luma scored 31 out of 100, significantly lower than the Entry Tier average score of 44.


A bar chart comparing the battery performance of the Logicom Luma smartphone

In a competitive landscape, the Xiaomi Redmi 13C leads with a score of 52, while the Xiaomi Redmi A3 scores 39. This indicates that the Logicom Luma's battery life is below average, suggesting it may require more frequent charging. This battery performance test result highlights where the Logicom Luma may need to improve for users prioritising overall battery performance when choosing their smartphone.

 

 

2. Battery Life


How long will the Logicom Luma battery last?

ViserMark Label for Battery Life showing 1.5 Days of Use or 39 Hours for the Logicom Luma smartphone

The Logicom Luma test results indicate an awe-inspiring battery life of 1.5 days, or 39 hours, on a single charge.



The two graphs compare the Logicom Luma's battery life against the Xiaomi Redmi A3 and Redmi 13C and the average test result of previously tested Entry Tier smartphones this year. They reveal interesting trends and insights.


The Logicom Luma, with its 1.5 days of use, provides sufficient battery life for basic tasks. While it may not exceed the Entry Tier average of 2 days, it still holds its ground against competitors like the Xiaomi Redmi 13C, which outperforms with an impressive 2.5 days, and the Xiaomi Redmi A3, which matches the Logicom Luma at 1.5 days. This indicates that this smartphone is a reliable choice with a balance between battery life and affordability.



A bar chart comparing the battery life in Days of the Logicom Luma smartphone

Translating days into hours, the Logicom Luma lasts 39 hours, compared to the Entry Tier average of 51 hours. The Xiaomi Redmi 13C leads with 57 hours, followed by the Xiaomi Redmi A3 at 44 hours. This further highlights the Logicom Luma's lower battery performance than its competitors, suggesting it may require more frequent charging for heavy users.

A bar chart comparing the battery life in Hours of the Logicom Luma smartphone

One notable highlight is the consistent performance of the Xiaomi Redmi 13C, which outperforms the Entry Tier average and comparative smartphones. This battery optimisation and efficiency could be a game-changer for users prioritising battery life in their purchase decisions. The Entry Tier average of 2 days or 51 hours sets a benchmark that most smartphones strive to meet. However, it's important to note that the Logicom Luma, with its 1.5 days of use, still provides a reliable battery life for basic tasks, making it a viable option for many potential buyers.


 

3. NEW Battery Consumption

Logicom Luma battery review with viSer and VWS Analytics Studio


The Logicom Luma battery life details, as analysed using SmartViser's viSer and VWS Analytics Studio, provide a technical and detailed perspective on the smartphone's battery consumption. The platform's capability to monitor and access real-time test results explains how the Logicom Luma manages power under various daily user tasks.


ViserMark can identify the strengths and weaknesses of smartphones by comparing battery usage across similar devices, enabling potential buyers to choose the best smartphone based on their usage patterns.


Below is a graph that provides a detailed analysis of Logicom Luma's battery consumption across various daily tasks, comparing it to the average Entry Tier smartphone. The tasks include social media, outgoing calls, MMS, gaming, file transfer, camera usage, YouTube, email, media player, SMS, and web browsing. The current (mA) used by the Logicom Luma and the entry-tier average are displayed, highlighting how efficiently the Logicom Luma manages power in different scenarios.

A bar chart representing the battery consumption of the Logicom Luma with the Average Entry Tier smartphone

Social Media and Communication

The Logicom Luma consumes more power for social media and outgoing calls than the average for Entry Tier phones. People who use social media frequently or make many calls may find that the battery drains faster. Younger users, especially teenagers and adults active on social media, may have issues with this higher power consumption.


Media and Gaming

In tasks such as gaming and media playback (YouTube and media player), the Logicom Luma again shows higher power consumption than the Entry Tier average. This is particularly relevant for avid gamers, as gaming is a power-intensive activity, and the higher consumption of Logicom Luma here suggests there may be better choices for them. Similarly, for media consumption, the higher power draw implies shorter usage times for watching videos or listening to music before recharging. This trend might influence users who rely heavily on their phones for entertainment to consider alternative mobile phones with better battery efficiency.


Messaging and File Transfer

This smartphone performs close to the average for Entry Tier phones in tasks such as MMS, file transfer, and SMS. However, it still shows a slightly higher current draw. This suggests that while the Logicom Luma is relatively efficient in handling these tasks, there is still room for improvement. Users who heavily engage in messaging and file transfers, such as business professionals or those who frequently communicate for work, may find the battery life adequate.


Camera and Web Browsing

The Logicom Luma consumes significantly more power when using the camera and browsing the web. This issue is particularly noticeable when using the camera, as it uses more energy. Users who frequently use the camera or browse the web may need to restrict their usage to prevent the battery from draining quickly. This trend could impact users who enjoy photography or rely heavily on their phones for web browsing, which may lead them to consider other more suitable mobile phones with better battery performance.


Overall, the Logicom Luma generally consumes more power than the average Entry Tier phone across various tasks. This suggests that although it can handle everyday activities, other more power-efficient options are available. Users who value more extended battery life should consider this when considering the Logicom Luma. Also, the higher power consumption during tasks such as social media, gaming, and camera use highlights areas where the device could benefit from further optimisation to meet the needs of more demanding users.

 


 







 

Analysing Battery Efficiency:

Logicom Luma vs Xiaomi Redmi A3 Smartphone Comparison


A graph comparing the Logicom Luma (blue) and the Xiaomi Redmi A3 (orange) battery consumption across various daily tasks. The current (mA) used by both smartphones is displayed, highlighting the efficiency of each device in managing power during typical usage scenarios. A lower current draw indicates better battery efficiency.

A bar chart displaying the Battery Performance of the Logicom Luma with the Xiaomi Redmi A3

Social Media and Communication

For social media and outgoing calls, the Logicom Luma uses less battery to demonstrate higher power efficiency than the Xiaomi Redmi A3. This suggests that users who frequently engage in social media or make calls might experience longer battery life with the Logicom Luma. This trend highlights Logicom Luma's advantage in handling communication tasks, making it appealing to younger users who are more active on social media.


Media and Gaming

In gaming and media playback (YouTube and media player) tasks, the Logicom Luma shows better power efficiency, consuming less current than the Xiaomi Redmi A3. Gaming, a power-intensive activity, shows a significant difference in battery consumption, indicating that the Logicom Luma might be a better choice for avid gamers. Similarly, for media consumption, the lower power draw implies longer usage times for watching videos or listening to music before recharging, enhancing the Logicom Luma's appeal to entertainment-focused users.


Messaging and File Transfer

The Logicom Luma has been found to perform tasks like MMS, file transfer, and SMS more efficiently, showing a lower current draw compared to the Xiaomi Redmi A3. This suggests that the Logicom Luma is well-optimised for these activities. Individuals who heavily rely on messaging and file transfers, such as business professionals or those who frequently communicate for work, may find the Logicom Luma's battery life more satisfactory.


Camera and Web Browsing

The Logicom Luma's power consumption for camera use and web browsing is lower than that of the Xiaomi Redmi A3. Users who frequently use the camera or browse the web may enjoy a longer battery life, and this efficiency also makes the Logicom Luma a more appealing option for photography enthusiasts and heavy web users.


In summary, while the Logicom Luma offers reasonable performance, its higher power efficiency than the Xiaomi Redmi A3 suggests that users might experience less frequent charging. This comparison underscores Logicom Luma's strength in battery efficiency, making it a strong competitor in the Entry Tier market.


However, it is essential to note that the Logicom Luma has much longer charging times. According to the test results, the Logicom Luma requires 9.14 hours to charge fully, significantly longer than the Xiaomi Redmi A3 at 2.38 hours and the Xiaomi Redmi 13C at 1.55 hours, highlighting a crucial area for improvement.


 

Analysing Battery Efficiency:

Logicom Luma vs Xiaomi Redmi 13C Smartphone Comparison


The graph compares the battery consumption of the Logicom Luma (dark blue) and the Xiaomi Redmi 13C (light blue) during various daily tasks, showcasing their power efficiency. A lower current draw indicates better battery efficiency.

A bar chart displaying the Battery Performance of the Logicom Luma with the Xiaomi Redmi 13C

Social Media and Communication

The Logicom Luma demonstrates higher power efficiency for social media and outgoing calls than the Xiaomi Redmi 13C. This suggests that users who frequently engage in social media or make calls might experience longer battery life with the Logicom Luma.


Media and Gaming

In tasks such as gaming and media playback (YouTube and media player), the Logicom Luma shows mixed results. While it demonstrates better power efficiency for media playback, the Xiaomi Redmi 13C shows a lower battery consumption during gaming. This indicates that the Logicom Luma might be a better choice for users who consume a lot of video content. At the same time, the Xiaomi Redmi 13C could be preferable for gamers due to its lower power consumption during gaming sessions.


Messaging and File Transfer

Regarding messaging and file transfer, Logicom Luma is the clear winner regarding power efficiency. The Logicom Luma's battery life could be more satisfactory if you rely heavily on these activities.


Camera and Web Browsing

The Logicom Luma consumes less power when using the camera or browsing the web than the Xiaomi Redmi 13C. This suggests that people who often use the camera or browse the web may enjoy a longer battery life with the Logicom Luma. This efficiency makes it a more appealing choice for photography enthusiasts and heavy web users, showcasing its strength in managing power for these activities.


The comparison shows that the Logicom Luma uses less power than the Xiaomi Redmi 13C for most tasks. This means the Logicom Luma is more power-efficient and will have a longer battery life. If you value battery longevity and efficiency, you might prefer the Logicom Luma, mainly if you frequently use social media, watch videos, or take photos.


In summary, while the Logicom Luma provides reasonable performance, its higher power efficiency than the Xiaomi Redmi 13C suggests that users may need to charge it less often. This underscores the Logicom Luma's strength in battery efficiency, making it a strong contender in the Entry Tier market. However, it's important to note that the Logicom Luma takes much longer to charge, which could be a drawback for users who need quick recharges.

 


 







 

Analysing Battery Efficiency:

Logicom Luma Smartphone Comparison


The graph compares the power efficiency of the Logicom Luma with three other smartphones during various daily tasks. It shows each smartphone's current (mA), with a lower current draw indicating better battery efficiency.


A bar chart displaying the Battery Performance of the Logicom Luma with the Xiaomi Redmi A3 and Redmi 13C

Social Media and Communication

The Logicom Luma stands out with its superior power efficiency regarding social media usage. It uses less current than the Xiaomi Redmi A3 and Xiaomi Redmi 13C. While it's slightly higher than the Entry Tier average, it still offers a balance of efficiency comparable to the overall market standard. While the Logicom Luma demonstrates better efficiency for outgoing calls than the Xiaomi Redmi A3 and Xiaomi Redmi 13C, it's still less efficient than the entry-tier average.


Media and Gaming

The Logicom Luma consumes more power in gaming than the Xiaomi Redmi 13C, which is the most efficient in this category. However, it performs better than the Xiaomi Redmi A3 and the Entry Tier average. This suggests that while the Logicom Luma is a decent choice for casual gaming, heavy gamers might prefer the Xiaomi Redmi 13C for its superior efficiency. It's worth noting that a more power-efficient smartphone can provide longer gaming sessions without frequent charging, enhancing the overall gaming experience.

Regarding media tasks like YouTube and media playback, the Logicom Luma is highly efficient. It consumes less power than the Xiaomi Redmi A3 and the Entry Tier average. While it's slightly more than the Xiaomi Redmi 13C, it is still a strong candidate for users who frequently watch videos or listen to music on their smartphones.


Messaging and File Transfer

The Logicom Luma shows better power efficiency in MMS and file transfer tasks than the Xiaomi smartphones and the Entry Tier average, making it suitable for users who rely heavily on messaging and file transfers, such as business professionals or those who frequently communicate for work.


Camera and Web Browsing

The Logicom Luma is more efficient than the Xiaomi Redmi A3 and has an Entry Tier average for camera use, but it consumes slightly more power than the Xiaomi Redmi 13C. So, it is a good option for users who frequently use their phone's camera, though the Xiaomi Redmi 13C may offer slightly better efficiency. In web browsing, the Logicom Luma again shows higher efficiency than the Xiaomi Redmi A3 and Entry Tier average but less efficient than the Xiaomi Redmi 13C. This indicates that the Logicom Luma provides a balanced performance for web browsing, making it a viable choice for internet users.


In summary, the Logicom Luma offers solid performance with good battery efficiency in most tasks, making it a strong competitor in the Entry Tier market. Its efficiency in critical areas like social media, messaging, and media playback highlights its strengths. However, the significantly longer charging time is a crucial factor that potential buyers should consider. Users prioritising quick recharges may find this aspect a consideration despite the Logicom Luma’s overall power efficiency. 


 

4. Power Efficiency


What is the Battery Efficiency of the Logicom Luma?

ViserMark Label for Battery Efficiency showing 1/5 for the Logicom Luma smartphone


The battery efficiency for the Logicom Luma was 1 leaf out of 5.



The graph illustrates the battery efficiency ratings of the Logicom Luma compared to other Entry Tier smartphones. The efficiency is rated on a scale of 1 to 5 leaves, with 5 being the highest efficiency.

A bar chart comparing the battery efficiency of the Logicom Luma

The Logicom Luma received a rating of 1 leaf, indicating the lowest efficiency among the compared devices. In contrast, the Xiaomi Redmi 13C achieved the highest efficiency with a rating of 1.5 leaves, followed by the Entry Tier average at 1.33 leaves and the Xiaomi Redmi A3 at one leaf. This rating highlights the Logicom Luma's comparatively lower power efficiency, suggesting that it consumes more battery power for the same tasks than its peers. Users of energy-efficient devices may find the Logicom Luma less appealing than its more efficient counterparts like the Xiaomi Redmi 13C.


 

5. Annual Energy Consumption


How much energy does the Logicom Luma use?


Annual energy consumption refers to the total energy a smartphone uses over a year. This measure helps understand the smartphone's long-term efficiency and environmental impact, indicating how much power it draws during typical usage scenarios.

ViserMark Label for Annual Energy Consumption showing 4.2kHw for the Logicom Luma smartphone

The Logicom Luma has an annual energy consumption of 4.2 kWh.





The graph attached illustrates the annual energy consumption of the Logicom Luma compared to similar Entry Tier smartphones, Energy consumption is measured in kilowatt-hours (kWh) per year.

A bar chart comparing the annual energy consumption of the Logicom Luma

With the highest annual energy consumption at 4.2 kWh, the Logicom Luma is significantly higher than the Entry Tier average of 3.2 kWh. The Xiaomi Redmi 13C demonstrates the lowest energy consumption at 2.9 kWh, followed by the Xiaomi Redmi A3 at 3.7 kWh. This indicates that the Logicom Luma is less energy-efficient and consumes more power annually than the others. This higher energy consumption reflects lower power efficiency, suggesting that users may incur higher electricity costs over the smartphone's lifespan.


 

VERDICT:


What is it like to Use?


Based on various performance metrics and comparisons with other Entry Tier smartphones, the Logicom Luma presents a mixed bag of user experiences, balancing decent performance with notable drawbacks. It shows commendable power efficiency in daily tasks such as social media, messaging, and media playback. For users who frequently engage in social media, make outgoing calls, or watch videos, the Logicom Luma is efficient, consuming less current than the Xiaomi Redmi A3 and performing on par with or better than the Entry Tier average. This makes it a good choice for younger users or those whose daily routines heavily involve these activities.


However, the Logicom Luma falls short in areas requiring intensive power usage, such as gaming, where it consumes more power than the Xiaomi Redmi 13C, which is the most efficient. Therefore, heavy gamers might prefer the Xiaomi Redmi 13C for its superior efficiency. Additionally, the Logicom Luma demonstrates good efficiency in camera usage and web browsing, using less power than the Xiaomi Redmi A3 and the entry-tier average. However, it lags slightly behind the Xiaomi Redmi 13C. This balance makes it a viable choice for users who frequently use their phone's camera or browse the web


One of the significant drawbacks of the Logicom Luma is its overall battery efficiency and charging time. Scoring only 1 out of 5 in battery efficiency indicates lower power efficiency. Also, the Logicom Luma has a substantially longer charging time of 9.14 hours, much higher than the Xiaomi Redmi A3 (2.38 hours), Xiaomi Redmi 13C (1.55 hours), and the Entry Tier average (3.27 hours). This prolonged charging time can be a major inconvenience for users who need quick recharges and frequent device usage throughout the day. Although, it is suitable for everyday use, its drawbacks in battery efficiency and long charging times may deter potential buyers who prioritise quick recharges and lower energy costs.


What's in the box?


  • Logicom Luma Smartphone

  • USB-C cable

  • Charger

  • User Manual

  • 2-year guarantee


Should I buy the Logicom Luma?


When deciding whether to purchase the Logicom Luma, you must consider your priorities and how you use your mobile phone. Suppose you use your phone for everyday tasks such as social media, messaging, and media playback. In that case, it performs reasonably well regarding power efficiency and is suitable for younger users or those who engage in these activities regularly. However, if you are a heavy gamer or need quick recharges and lower energy consumption, the Logicom Luma's longer charging times and lower battery efficiency are significant drawbacks. Additionally, its higher annual energy consumption suggests higher long-term costs.


Overall, while the Logicom Luma offers some strengths in efficiency for everyday tasks, its shortcomings in charging time and energy use make more efficient alternatives like the Xiaomi Redmi 13C more appealing for users with demanding needs.

 

Extra Insights


Q: Does the Logicom Luma support 5G?

No, it does not

Q: Does the Logicom Luma have dual-SIM capabilities?

Q: What storage and RAM variants support the Logicom Luma?

Q: Does the Logicom Luma have stereo speakers?

Q: Does the Logicom Luma have a microSD card slot?

Q: Is the Logicom Luma VoLTE enabled?


 

Pricing and Availability


A graphic of the Logicom Luma mobile phone
English Amazon Logo
German Amazon Logo
French Amazon Logo









These prices are the best from our Affiliate Partners. As an Amazon Associate, we may earn commissions from qualifying purchases from Amazon.com. You can learn more about our disclosure policy here.

 

VCX (Valued Camera eXperience)


The VCX Forum has been working with its members on the system and infrastructure as a non-profit organisation. We strive to improve our technology to develop and exchange accurate and objective quality and performance indicators, which is our ultimate goal. We will also serve as a compass for the smartphone camera industry. We appreciate your interest in the VCX Forum.


No VCX reviews are available for this smartphone.


 








 

Background

Logicom is a well-established French company that has been at the forefront of consumer electronics since its inception in 1993. Over the years, the company has diversified its product offerings, expanding from its origins in residential telephony to include a wide range of innovative technology products. This focuses on smartphones, tablets, connected devices, and more.


With a commitment to making cutting-edge technology accessible to everyone, Logicom has built a reputation for providing high-quality, stylish, and affordable electronic devices. With a quarter-century of experience and a dedication to innovation, Logicom remains a trusted name in the consumer electronics industry. 


 

Get all the latest reviews.


Join our readers to receive the latest update to our smartphone battery performance scores and performance reviews as soon as we finish testing!





 

Written By


Head and shoulders photo of Debbie Bouffler writer of this Logicom Luma smartphone review

Debbie Bouffler is the Marketing and Communications Manager at SmartViser. She is crucial in developing the company's communication and marketing strategies. Debbie has gained extensive experience in strategic business development and marketing in various industries, which has helped her excel in her current position.


Debbie is a leader with imagination, an unmatched drive, and an infectious passion for growth and excellence, especially in the telecommunications industry.

 

Affiliate Disclosure:

These prices are the best from our Affiliate Partners. As an Amazon Associate, we may earn commissions from qualifying purchases from Amazon.com. You can learn more about our disclosure policy here.

Comments

Rated 0 out of 5 stars.
No ratings yet

Add a rating
bottom of page