SMARTPHONE TIER: HIGH Battery Capacity mAh: 4315 Smartphone Battery Performance: Ranking #57 In the lower half for Battery Performance within the High Tier Ranking Table Battery Performance Testing and Review – May 2021 Product The Vivo X51 was one of the chosen devices by the Chinese brand to land in Europe in 2020, it looks similar to the Asian X50 Pro model, however, the Vivo X51 has additional improvements and features. With a large battery capacity of 4315 aMh, it has a 33W fast charge as well. Having an aesthetic design that is clean and contemporary with a slim flex screen, it also has a 3.96 mm super small camera. Available in an Alpha Grey bringing high-end fashion into high technology, it offers Motion AF Tracking that lets you choose any object in a frame and keeps focus on it. Release Date October 2020 Product Features and Specification Design: Sophisticated design with metal borders. Rear Camera (Quad): 48 MP, f/1.6 (Wide), PDAF, Laser AF, gimbal stabilisation. 8 MP, f/3.4, 135mm (periscope telephoto), 1/4.0”, PDAF, 5x O zoom 13 MP, f/2.5, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.8”, 0.8 µm, PDAF, 2x O zoom 8 MP, f/2.2, 120°, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0”, 1.12 µm Selfie Camera (single): 32 MP, f/2.5, 36mm (Wide), 1/2.8”, 0.8 µm. Video: 1080@30fps, gyro-EIS. Battery: 4315 mAh (33W fast charge) Display: 6.56" Amoled, 90 Hz, HDR10+ Size: 158.5 x 72.8 x 8 mm Weight: 181.5g Memory: 256 GB ROM 8 GB RAM, No cart slot available Chipset: Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G (7 nm) Android: Android 10, Funtouch 10.0 Software Version: RP1A.200720.012 release-keys Battery Performance Introduction The Vivo X51 is a ViserMark High tier smartphone (between 500 - 700 EURO). The smartphone has the Qualcomm® Snapdragon™ 765G processor and boosts both high-end flagship performance and low energy consumption. The overall Battery Performance Score is now a global score taking calculations from Battery Life, Power Efficiency and Charging Times. From the Vivo X51 test results, we have given this Smartphone a ViserMark score of 44. The Battery Performance Label, being nearer 100 indicates that it is one of the mid-range performing ones and has been ranked in 57th place of the best Battery Performance Smartphones as tested by SmartViser. Testing Results BATTERY LIFE - Days of Use The Vivo X51 settings allowed us to test the smartphone with two different settings, which included a 90 Hz and 60 Hz refresh rate. Through the ViserMark test protocol, the battery life autonomy was just over 39 hours with a 60 Hz refresh rate, and around 37 hours with a 90 Hz refresh rate. This achieved 1.5 Days of Use as a ViserMark Battery Performance score . With the average Days of Use ViserMark Battery Life score of a High Tier, Smartphone being “1.7” Days, the Vivo X51 matches the majority of similar Smartphones that also achieved this Battery Life score. CHARGING TIME - Hours and Minutes With the 33W fast charge option, we obtained an outstanding Charging Time of 1 hour and 3 minutes, Vivo advertised 30 mins charging time to 50% which seems correct although it was not verified. Test Graphics Our testing is based on real smartphone usage from 100% battery level down to Power Off. When testing Smartphones, the testing protocol includes common daily life activities, for instance: Calls, Web, Video and Music streaming, Gaming, Social networks, Picture & Video capture and standby. All testing is performed under strictly controlled test conditions with all activities being executed in a defined order and timeline. Figure 1. Battery test at 90 Hz There are a number of power-efficient processors, within today's Smartphones, that are able to cope with the growing number of new applications and can support high-resolution displays without compromising battery life. Power Efficiency is calculated using Battery Life and Battery Capacity. This is expressed in “Leaves" and reflects a rating between 1 being least and 5 being the most power-efficient. The Vivo X51 achieved an overall Power Efficiency Score of 1.0 and is placed in the lower half of the most Power Efficiency Smartphones within the High Tier. Conclusion The Vivo X51 ViserMark Battery Performance score reached was 44. As previously mentioned, this positioned this particular Smartphone in the low part of the ViserMark High Tier ranking table when comparing it to other High Tier Smartphones of similar battery size. Although the Vivo X51 score is close to other comparative Smartphones like the OnePlus 8 Pro (46) and the Oppo Find X2 Neo (47). There is still room for battery life improvement to reach the top of the ViserMark High Tier ranking table and get a Battery Performance score like the Samsung S20 F3 5G (50) or the Huawei P40 Pro (51). ViserMark tests are performed with the strictest protocol in a controlled environment to ensure repetition and consistency powered and automated by SmartViser’s test automation solution viSer . The automation test includes a variety of user actions from calls to social media and periods of standby times. VCX (V alued C amera e X perience ) - not available at present. The VCX Forum has been working with its members on the system and infrastructure as a non-profit organisation. We strive to improve our technology to develop and exchange accurate and objective quality and performance indicators that are our ultimate goal. We will also serve as a compass for the smartphone camera industry. We appreciate your interest in VCX-Forum. See More Reviews Background Vivo is all about 'daring to pursue true perfection, while continuously creating the surprising' Over the past 9 years, they have dared to pursue true perfection, increasingly leading the company to a new height. They unveiled the world’s first Half-Screen In-Display Fingerprint Scanning Technology on Vivo APEXTM, along with Screen SoundCasting Technology and an Elevating Front Camera. Vivo now has over 200,000,000 users and are the preferred brand of young people around the world. Latest Reviews If you're looking for the best smartphone on the market, battery performance is one of the key decisive aspects then  ViserMark is for you. ​ Not only is ViserMark the first label that measures battery performance , translating mAh into direct battery life scores, but it is also a highly valuable marketing asset to device manufacturers and end-users . ViserMark is a benchmark to help make better-informed choices when buying a Smartphone.

SMARTPHONE TIER: ENTRY Battery Capacity: 5000 Smartphone Battery Performance : Ranking #18 In the higher part f or Battery Performance within the Entry Tier Ranking Table Battery Performance Testing and Review – April 2021 Product The Vivo Y11s is the successor of the Y11 model launched in 2019 by the Chinese brand. Together with the Y70 and Y20s, the Y11s is part of the Y family being the most modest smartphone among them. The Y11s is the evolved version of the 2019 model, the Y11s offers new features and improvements as well as a new design. Release Date: January 2020 Product Features and Specification Design: A mix between colours and elegance. Rear Camera: 3 MP (f/2.2 wide) + 2 MP (f/2.4 depth) Selfie Camera: 8 MP (f/1.8 (wide) Battery: 5000 mAh (10W fast charge) Display: 6.51" Size: 164.4 x 76.3 x 8.4 mm Weight: 191g Memory: 32 GB ROM 3 GB RAM Chipset: Qualcomm SM4250 Snapdragon 460 (11 nm) Android: Android 10, Funtouch 11 Software Version: RP1A.200720.012 release-keys Battery Performance Introduction The Vivo Y11s is classified as a ViserMark Entry Tier Smartphone (less than 200 EURO). The smartphone has a Qualcomm SM4250 Snapdragon 460 processor and is powered by a 5000mAh non-removable battery and a 10W fast charge option. The overall Battery Performance Score is now a global score taking calculations from Battery Life, Power Efficiency and Charging Times. From the Vivo Y11s test results, we have given this Smartphone a ViserMark Battery Performance Score of 51 . The Battery Performance Label, being nearer 100 indicates that it is one of the better-performing ones and has been ranked in 18th place of the best Battery Performance Smartphones as tested by SmartViser. Testing Results BATTERY LIFE - Days of Use Through the ViserMark test protocol, the Y11s battery life autonomy was just over 63 hours and obtains a ViserMark Battery Life Score of 2.5 Days of Use. The average ViserMark Battery Life score of Entry Tier Smartphones is 2.2 Days of Use. This positioning the Vivo Y11s in the Top 10 of the ViserMark Battery Life Rankings. CHARGING TIME - Hours and Minutes To reach the full 100% the Charging Time was 2 hours and 25 minutes. The average Charging Time is 1:46 for a Smartphone within the ViserMark Entry Tier. Best Smartphone for Charging Times: Ranking #51 One of the Top 10 Entry Tier Smartphones with the Best Charging Times Test Graphics Our testing is based on real smartphone usage from 100% battery level down to Power Off. When testing Smartphones, the testing protocol includes common daily life activities, for instance: Calls, Web, Video and Music streaming, Gaming, Social networks, Picture & Video capture and standby. All testing is performed under strictly controlled test conditions with all activities being executed in a defined order and timeline. Figure 1. Battery test at 90 Hz There are a number of power-efficient processors, within today's Smartphones, that are able to cope with the growing number of new applications and can support high-resolution displays without compromising battery life. Power Efficiency is calculated using Battery Life and Battery Capacity. This is expressed in “Leaves" and reflects a rating between 1 being least and 5 being the most power-efficient. The Vivo Y11s achieved an overall Power Efficiency Score of 2.0 Best Smartphone for Power Efficiency: Ranking #35 Conclusion The Vivo Y11s Battery Performance Score showed as 51, a good achievement when compared with other smartphones within the ViserMark Entry Tier. Also, compared with other Entry Tier Smartphones having the same battery size, the Vivo Y11s performance is still remarkable, getting better scores than devices like Xiaomi Redmi 8 (47), and Oppo A15 (49) and being able to match the Huawei Y6, Oppo A5 2020 and Xiaomi Redmi 7. ViserMark tests are performed with the strictest protocol in a controlled environment to ensure repetition and consistency powered and automated by SmartViser’s test automation solution viSer. The automation test includes a variety of user actions from calls to social media and periods of standby times. VCX (V alued C amera e X perience ) The VCX Forum has been working with its members on the system and infrastructure as a non-profit organisation. We strive to improve our technology to develop and exchange accurate and objective quality and performance indicators that are our ultimate goal. We will also serve as a compass for the smartphone camera industry. We appreciate your interest in VCX-Forum. Vivo Y11s Camera Rating Details See More Reviews Background Vivo is all about 'daring to pursue true perfection, while continuously creating the surprising' Over the past 9 years, they have dared to pursue true perfection, increasingly leading the company to a new height. They unveiled the world’s first Half-Screen In-Display Fingerprint Scanning Technology on Vivo APEXTM , along with Screen SoundCasting Technology and an Elevating Front Camera. Vivo now has over 200,000,000 users and are the preferred brands of young people around the world. Latest Reviews If you're looking for the best smartphone on the market, battery performance is one of the key decisive aspects then  ViserMark is for you. ​ Not only is ViserMark the first label that measures battery performance , translating mAh into direct battery life scores, but it is also a highly valuable marketing asset to device manufacturers and end-users . ViserMark is a benchmark to help make better-informed choices when buying a Smartphone.

The lab team at ViserMark has been running battery life tests for some of the newly released smartphones this year. As many more Android smartphones have 5G options we wanted to take a closer look at the connectivity, performance and battery life of the Samsung Galaxy S21 5G and the Vivo Y72 5G. The Samsung Galaxy S21 5G was revealed in January this year as the flagship for the Samsung S-series. For testing purposes, this time our Samsung Galaxy S21 5G is Phantom Violet, (we think it is quite a refreshing colour), also it is still a compact smartphone available within the flagship tier (€700 +) of the Visermark Smartphone Tiers. Having many features including, an AMOLED display with adaptive refresh rate handling, enhanced selfie performance and a 4000mAh battery with 25W charging. Keep in mind, that there is no charger or headphones included with this package. The Vivo Y72 5G is the latest smartphone to be released from Vivo. Being ranked as mid tier (€200-€499) smartphone, it also showcases many features including that of a MediaTek’s Dimensity 700 5G chipset and a powerful 5000 mAh battery with 8W charging. It is an attractive smartphone for the price, being around €400 less expensive than the high-end Samsung Galaxy S21 5G. It will provide you with 5G plus all the features you come to expect from today’s smartphones. The most significant frustration mentioned by end-users about their current smartphone is poor battery. Battery performance is a top reason for selecting a new smartphone. 5G has transformed smartphone capabilities with improved connectivity to other devices, such as a household appliance, a car or simply a watch. It also allows for the streaming of TV, music, films etc. with much faster connection speeds – often 20 times faster than 4G. Our short video - Are You 5G Ready? covers the capabilities, but there are also other factors worth considering about 5G... Speed Bandwidth is a key benefit to this technology, being able to handle around a thousand times more data at once than 4G. Coverage 5G range is not as good as 4G coverage. Despite nationwide networks being already built with more on the way, speeds still vary quite widely. Battery Life 5G smartphones are likely to be much more demanding in terms of power and data than 4G smartphone equivalents. With battery life being a key consideration when buying a new smartphone, is 5G more likely to drain your battery? Well, it is time to find out! Although both smartphones are tempting, which one offers the best battery life performance on 4G or 5G? To answer this question, we took the Samsung Galaxy S21 5G and Vivo Y72 5G smartphones to our independent testing lab, where viSer test automation measures and validates key areas of an end user’s experience using our highly specialised, state-of-the-art lab environment. Our SmartViser technology experts use their years of experience to simulate real day life general usage. Testing Scope: Network Conditions: 4G & 5G with similar radio network conditions (Between -80dbm and -90dbm) Mobile Network: Orange France Location of Testing: Rennes France Use Cases: Web Browsing Youtube Social Media (Instagram) With the Vivo Y72 5G having a battery of 5000 mAh capacity, the bigger battery of the two, since the Samsung Galaxy S21 5G features a slightly lower battery capacity of 4000 mAh. The ratings indicated in our results show in minutes the duration to drain 5% of the battery capacity for the Samsung Galaxy S21 5G or the Vivo Y72 5G. Orange was selected as the network provider for both 4G and 5G, offering similar radio conditions during testing. Finally, 3 user cases were selected, specifically focussing on common daily life activities of an end-user when consuming data. Outcomes Below reflect the test results for the Samsung Galaxy S21 5G: Below reflect the test results for the Vivo Y72 5G: To learn more about our automated testing protocol click here Both smartphones when using 5G, generally display over draining slightly more. However, the test results show improved performance for streaming. Samsung Galaxy S21 5G So the Samsung Galaxy S21 5G, as we already know has a smaller battery life than the Vivo Y72 5G, however, when testing on 4G and 5G within good signal strength and comparable quality conditions, the Samsung Galaxy offers similar battery life. Vivo Y72 5G Also, the Vivo Y72, with good signal strength and comparable quality conditions, offers a similar level of battery life. If you are an early adopter of 5G then it should not have a serious impact on battery life. As theoretically, radio coverage is far from wide and radio condition will remain at a lower strength and for instance, indoor coverage is weaker. At ViserMark we have measured the impact of weaker 5G radio condition on battery life. As you can see below impact is rather important. Conclusion From our findings, there is not a large difference between the Samsung Galaxy S21 5G and the Vivo Y72 5G when comparing 4G vs 5G connectivity. That said, the Samsung Galaxy S21 5G offers good performance, a sharp display and a battery life of around one day. It's also worth pointing out that the Vivo Y72 5G certainty delivers a slight performance boost with its 5000 mAh battery. Your choice to keep your phone connectivity on 5G will depend on your usage. 4G is still perfect for browsing and using social apps, indeed we have not noticed any significant changes in performance for the specific everyday user activities tested. The 4G coverage is in most locations much better than 5G and using 4G more will help to limit battery drainage. If you are heavily consuming media or a business user higher data rate may boost your experience while you will need to compromise with lower battery life. This was our very first dedicated 5G battery life and performance testing, we will continue further analysis on 4G vs 5G connectivity and the impact on the battery life and performance of a smartphone. We will aim to replicate more typical end-user usage testing incorporating 5G coverage. Further reports and testing results will be shared in the coming months with performance on specific devices, chipsets, and Network Operators. Make sure you follow us on Social Media and receive our Newsletters to stay up to date with all our latest insights.

SMARTPHONE TIER: ENTRY Battery Capacity mAh: 5000 Smartphone Battery Performance: Ranking #13 In the Top 3 Smartphones f or Battery Performance within the Entry Tier Ranking Table Battery Performance Testing and Review – April 2021 Product Being part of the Smart line, the Huawei P Smart 2021 was one of the last Smartphones from the Chinese brand for 2020. It is the first device from its family to come without Google services. The Huawei P Smart 2021 is presented as the evolution of the Huawei P Smart 2020 model. Release Date September 2020 Product Features and Specification Design: A mix between colours and elegance Rear Camera: 48 MP (f/1.8 aperture) + 8 MP (120° Ultra-Wide-Angle Lens, f/2.4 aperture) + 2 MP (Depth Lens, f/2.4 aperture) + 2 MP (Macro Lens, f/2.4 aperture) Selfie Camera: 8 MP (f/2.0 aperture) Battery: 5000 mAh (22.5W fast charge) Display: 6.67" Size: 165.7 x 76.9 x 9.3 mm Weight: 206g Memory: 128 GB ROM 4 GB RAM Chipset: Huawei Kirin 710A (14 nm) Android: Android 10, EMUI 10.1, no Google Play Services Software Version: PPAH-L22 10.1.1.155(C432E4R2P1) Battery Performance Introduction The Huawei P Smart 2021 is classed as a ViserMark Entry Tier Smartphone (less than 200 EURO), it has a Kirin 710A chipset, the evolved version of 710 one. Huawei has powered the 2021 model with a 5000mAh battery, and a 22.5W fast charge option. The overall Battery Performance Score is now a global score taking calculations from Battery Life, Power Efficiency and Charging Times. From the Huawei P Smart 2021 test results, we have given this Smartphone a ViserMark Battery Performance Score of 53 . The Battery Performance Label, being nearer 100 indicates that it is one of the better-performing ones and has been ranked in 13th place of the best Battery Performance Smartphones as tested by SmartViser. Testing Results BATTERY LIFE - Days of Use Through the ViserMark test protocol, the Huawei P Smart 2021 battery life lasts over 59 hours and it obtains a ViserMark Battery Life Score of 2.5 Days of Use. The average ViserMark Battery Life score of Entry Tier Smartphones is 2.2 Days of Use. This impressive result, positioning the Huawei P Smart 2021 in the Top 10 of the ViserMark Battery Life autonomy ranking. CHARGING TIME - Hours and Minutes To reach the full 100% the Charging Time was 1 hour and 42 minutes . The average Charging Time is 1:46 for a Smartphone within the ViserMark Entry Tier. Best Smartphone for Charging Times: Ranking #37 One of the Top 5 Entry Tier Smartphones with the Best Charging Times Test Graphics Our testing is based on real smartphone usage from 100% battery level down to Power Off. When testing Smartphones, the testing protocol includes common daily life activities, for instance: Calls, Web, Video and Music streaming, Gaming, Social networks, Picture & Video capture and standby. All testing is performed under strictly controlled test conditions with all activities being executed in a defined order and timeline. Figure 1. Battery test at 90 Hz There are a number of power-efficient processors, within today's Smartphones, that are able to cope with the growing number of new applications and can support high-resolution displays without compromising battery life. Power Efficiency is calculated using Battery Life and Battery Capacity. This is expressed in “Leaves" and reflects a rating between 1 being least and 5 being the most power-efficient. The Huawei P Smart 2021 achieved an overall Power Efficiency Score of 1.5 Best Smartphone for Power Efficiency: Ranking #37 Conclusion To conclude, the Huawei P Smart 2021 Battery Performance Score achieved was 53 and is higher than most Entry Tier Smartphones. However, when comparing the device performance with other devices having the same battery size, the Huawei P Smart 2021 Battery Performance is slightly lower than expected. The Huawei P Smart 2021 Smartphone performs better than the Xiaomi Redmi 8 (47) and the Xiaomi Redmi 7 (51) but is behind some of their main competitors’ Smartphones such as the Realme 7i (62), Wiko Power U20 (62), and the best-performing Smartphone Wiko View 5 (68). ViserMark tests are performed with the strictest protocol in a controlled environment to ensure repetition and consistency powered and automated by SmartViser’s test automation solution viSer. The automation test includes a variety of user actions from calls to social media and periods of standby times. VCX (V alued C amera e X perience ) The VCX Forum has been working with its members on the system and infrastructure as a non-profit organisation. We strive to improve our technology to develop and exchange accurate and objective quality and performance indicators that are our ultimate goal. We will also serve as a compass for the smartphone camera industry. We appreciate your interest in VCX-Forum. Huawei P Smart 2021 Camera Rating Details See More Reviews Background Founded in 1987, Huawei is a leading global provider of information and communications technology (ICT) infrastructure and smart devices. They have more than 194,000 employees, and operate in more than 170 countries and regions, serving more than three billion people around the world. Huawei is a private company wholly owned by its employees Latest Reviews If you're looking for the best smartphone on the market, battery performance is one of the key decisive aspects then  ViserMark is for you. ​ Not only is ViserMark the first label that measures battery performance , translating mAh into direct battery life scores, but it is also a highly valuable marketing asset to device manufacturers and end-users . ViserMark is a benchmark to help make better-informed choices when buying a Smartphone.

SMARTPHONE TIER: ENTRY Battery Capacity mAh: 5000 Smartphone Battery Performance: Ranking #4 In the Top 3 Smartphones f or Battery Performance within the Entry Tier Ranking Table Battery Performance Testing and Review - April 2021 Product From the Realme 7 family, the Realme 7i was one of the last devices from the Chinese brand from 2020. The Realme 7i is the cheapest device from its family however its quality is remarkable for a low budget device. As the evolved version of the Realme 6i, the Realme 7i is designed to catch gamers attention due to its gaming processor and battery size. Release Date: September 2020 Product Features and Specification Design: Robust plastic design Main Camera: 48 MP, f/1.8 26mm (wide) (1/1.73”, 0,8µm), PDAF 8 MP (ultrawide), f/2.3, 119 ˚, 16 mm, (1/4.0”, 1.12 µm) 2 MP (macro) f/2.4 2 MP (depth) Selfie Camera: 16 MP, f/2.1, 26mm (Wide), 1/3”, 1.0µm Battery: 5000 mAh (18W fast charge) Display: 6.5" Size: 164.5 x 75.9 x 9.8 mm Weight: 188g Memory: 64/128 GB RAM: 4/8 GB Chipset: Qualcomm SM6115 Snapdragon 662 (11 nm) Android: Android 10, Realme UI Software Version: RMX2193_11_A.10 Battery Performance Introduction The Realme 7i is an Entry Tier Smartphone (less than 200 EURO) powered by the Mediatek Helio G85 chipset, a gaming processor specially designed for game lovers. The Realme 7i is powered by a 5000 mAh battery, and an 18W fast charge, a well-sized battery to offer enough autonomy while playing. The overall Battery Performance Score is now a global score taking calculations from Battery Life, Power Efficiency and Charging Times. From the Realme 7i test results, we have given this Smartphone a ViserMark Battery Performance Score of 62 . The Battery Performance Label, being nearer 100 indicates that it is one of the best-performing ones and has been ranked in 4th place of the best Battery Performance Smartphones as tested by SmartViser. Testing Results BATTERY LIFE - Days of Use Through the ViserMark test protocol, the Realme 7i battery lasts around 86 hours obtaining a ViserMark Battery Life score of 3.5 Days of Use. The average ViserMark Battery Life score of an Entry Tier Smartphone is 2.2 Days of Use. This score places the Realme 7i as one of the best Smartphones with great battery life and matches the Wiko Smartphones that dominate the ViserMark Entry Tier ranking. The Realme 7i also has a Super Power Saving mode that gives extra life to the phone when the battery is about to die. CHARGING TIME - Hours and Minutes To reach the full 100% the Charging Time was 3 hours and 7 minutes. The average Charging Time is 1:46 for a Smartphone within the ViserMark Entry Tier. Best Smartphone for Charging Times: Ranking #66 One of the Top 5 Entry Tier Smartphones with the Best Charging Times Test Graphics Our testing is based on real smartphone usage from 100% battery level down to Power Off. When testing Smartphones, the testing protocol includes common daily life activities, for instance: Calls, Web, Video and Music streaming, Gaming, Social networks, Picture & Video capture and standby. All testing is performed under strictly controlled test conditions with all activities being executed in a defined order and timeline. Figure 1. Battery test at 90 Hz There are a number of power-efficient processors, within today's Smartphones, that are able to cope with the growing number of new applications and can support high-resolution displays without compromising battery life. Power Efficiency is calculated using Battery Life and Battery Capacity. This is expressed in “Leaves" and reflects a rating between 1 being least and 5 being the most power-efficient. The Realme 7i achieved an overall Power Efficiency Score of 2.5 Best Smartphone for Power Efficiency: Ranking #8 One of the Top 5 Entry Tier Smartphones with the Best Power Efficiency Conclusion To conclude, the Realme 7i autonomy is higher than most devices in its price range, offering 3.5 days of autonomy through the ViserMark Test Protocol. To compare it with other Low Tier Smartphones, a selection of devices powered by a 3000 mAh battery was conducted expecting them to have Battery Performance scores close to half of the Realme 7i one. From this perspective, the Realme 7i Battery Performance stands close to other low tier devices like the Huawei Y6 (3020 mAh) (Visermark Battery Performance Score is 51) or the Huawei P Smart 2019 (3400 mAH) (Visermark Battery Performance Score is 47). ViserMark tests are performed with the strictest protocol in a controlled environment to ensure repetition and consistency powered and automated by SmartViser’s test automation solution viSer. The automation test includes a variety of user actions from calls to social media and periods of standby times. VCX (V alued C amera e X perience ) - not available at present The VCX Forum has been working with its members on the system and infrastructure as a non-profit organisation. We strive to improve our technology to develop and exchange accurate and objective quality and performance indicators that are our ultimate goal. We will also serve as a compass for the smartphone camera industry. We appreciate your interest in VCX-Forum. See More Reviews Background Realme is a Chinese smartphone manufacturer headquartered in Shenzhen, Guangdong. The company was founded on May 4, 2018, by Sky Li, who was former vice president of Oppo. By July 2019, Realme had successfully entered 20 markets, including China, South Asia, Southeast Asia, and Europe. In June of 2020, Realme's global users of smartphones reached 35 million Latest Reviews If you're looking for the best smartphone on the market, battery performance is one of the key decisive aspects then  ViserMark is for you. ​ Not only is ViserMark the first label that measures battery performance , translating mAh into direct battery life scores, but it is also a highly valuable marketing asset to device manufacturers and end-users . ViserMark is a benchmark to help make better-informed choices when buying a Smartphone.

At ViserMark, we have been testing devices for almost a year now. We have been following the introduction of higher refresh rate displays very carefully as this new technology is directly impacting battery life. Device manufacturers these days are looking for several ways to differentiate their devices by offering various features such as optimised battery life, enhanced cameras, 4K screens and recently high-end devices have included super-fast 90Hz to 120Hz refresh rates displays. Before we start analysing the impact let's explain what refresh rate is. What is refresh rate? What we need to understand is that smartphone displays are not static. The content in our devices appears very smooth and this is because every pixel in the display updates not randomly but at regular intervals which are known as a refresh rate. Why do refresh rates matter? A higher refresh rate will give a smoother experience when consuming certain content from your smartphone. You will get less value from steady usage content like looking at pictures, reading an article or email, during calls or even enjoying a short video. But for all usages with high screen transition, the comfort a user will experience from a higher refresh rate will be unmatched: browsing, scrolling within social apps, navigating through smartphone menus, searching for emails and gaming. In fact, high refresh rates were firstly introduced on gaming-focused smartphones (like the Razer Phone) and have progressively migrated to the premium segment, then into several more devices. After using a smartphone with a 90Hz to 120Hz refresh rate you will find it exceedingly difficult to switch back to 60Hz (the standard rate) as the quality of experience is noticeably enhanced. But this optimum performance for user experience comes with its drawbacks. Higher refresh rates require extra power, meaning a direct negative impact on battery life and performance. At ViserMark we measure this impact and aim to provide guidelines in our reviews on how to deal with this parameter. Results Analysis We have been testing two different phones: the Oppo Find X2 Pro which holds an excellent 120Hz Quad HD and the Xiaomi Mi10T Pro with one of the only LCD screens able to refresh up to 144Hz. We have selected two cases where the screen must manage a fast refresh to keep up with the following user interaction: scrolling up/down in Gmail mailbox and browsing through chrome selection of articles. Here are our findings: On Gmail browsing, we measured around 10% extra power drain when switching from 60Hz to 120Hz During Chrome browsing, we have measured up to 30% extra power drain when selecting 144Hz (Power drain during Chrome browsing: 60Hz in blue / 144 Hz in black on Redmi 10T Pro) As you know, the impact on battery life can be rather important. Although enabling a higher refresh rate will lead to shorter battery life, you can not conclude that the overall usage time will be reduced by up to 30%. Indeed, manufacturers have implemented an interesting feature to help you get the best experience with minimum impact on power drain: adaptive refresh rate. This means that the smartphone will adapt its refresh rate depending on the user activity. Furthermore, while the previous adaptive feature was switching between 60Hz, 90Hz or 120Hz, brand new premium displays are integrating a new adaptive algorithm. Which, can choose within a broader range of rates, from 10Hz to 120Hz, ensuring the balance between smoother experience and control of battery life. In conclusion, the latest display technologies around refresh rate are highly changing the user experience. While manufacturers are very cautious not to affect the impact on battery life, we recommend sticking to lower refresh rates for busy days where battery percentage remains key. This will ensure you prolong the battery life when you need it most. Further results will be shared in the coming months with performance on specific devices, chipsets, and Network Operators. Make sure you follow us on Social Media and receive our Newsletters to stay up to date with all our latest insights.

Preliminary Results 5G will bring lots of new technological advancements and speeder connections using a smartphone. It is well accepted in the Telecoms community that new advancements in technology like with 4G previously, will have lots of new advantages but the one area that always seems to suffer is the Battery life. This report will explore the benefits in terms of speeds and the impact on Battery performance taking into account the network set-up. Before we start you can see below a short video on 5G technology and how it compares with previous-generation technologies. An Overview of some of the key aspects of 5G can be seen in the video below: Test Automation At ViserMark using viSer test automation technology, we are in a position to assess and analyse many network and device Key Performance Indicators like: Data Performance (Web browsing, file transfer, streaming) Battery Life Network Access (Network coverage and performance) Call Services Messaging All testing was performed using with viSer in UK and France. 5G NSA and Main Challenges We have started a study several weeks ago on 5G NSA (Non-Standalone) in UK and France using the Live network in specific areas. The study will continue over the next months, but we can release some of the preliminary findings. NSA 5G is a solution where 5G is supported by the existing 4G infrastructure. We need to urge some caution at this stage to accurately measure the impact of the 5G in Battery life we have many variables that can affect the test results. Testing is performed on a Live network and therefore we are comparing a very mature technology 4G to a new technology 5G which is not yet fully comparable, but this can still give us some early indications. Before we get into the analysis of the results let us first list some of the challenges: Testing is performed on a Live network. 4G signal strength was very good -80dbm whereas 5G signal strength was weaker but still good at -99dbm. The first phase of testing has been performed on early 5G devices where the chipset technology was not fully optimised. We are expecting to see better performance with the latest chipsets and devices. We have experienced some network instability with services sometimes bouncing between 4G and 5G. Summary of First Observations and Findings: Network 5G deployments are still in the early phase. In 2021 we are expecting to see it more mainstream with further implementations. According to a GSA Report, 38 countries had 5G networks as of August 2020. The infographic below gives an overview of current deployments. Source: Statista We have noticed during our testing that performance can change a lot depending on location and operator. You may even do not see any real difference between 5G and 4G and this was a case in some test locations in France. Data Speeds Undoubtedly one of the key benefits of 5G is the data transfer either downlink or uplink speed. 5G promises device speeds around 10 times faster than 4G. From the testing, we have performed in two locations we have observed a maximum speed of around twice more than we saw on 4G. In the graph below you can see peak download throughput was 87.75 MB/s for 4G and 201 MB/s for the 5G. More interesting, the average downlink throughput is 3 times faster on 5G than on 4G. 5G speeds are continuously improving and we will be seeing even better performance as the technology matures. According to Qualcomm 5G is designed to deliver peak data rates to up to 20Gbps. So, with the data speeds, we have observed in the specific location if you want to download a 2 hour 4K film (14GB) in 4G it will take you roughly 22 minutes and 50 seconds based on the average score above. If you are looking to download the same film in 5G NSA this will take you 9 minutes 56 seconds in the 5G NSA network. When the 5G technology reaches its peak data rates the same film will be downloaded in an astonishing 6 seconds!! In the second location the testing was performed we did not achieve the same results of increased 5G performance. The performance was only marginally higher, and it can be seen by the graph below and in one instance 4G performed better. Battery Impact The download speed is very appealing for some and below we can see what the impact on the battery will be. From the testing we have performed we had just over the double increase in the data speed on 5G and this is accelerating the battery drain. The extra power drain is compensated by shorter data transfers. From the graph, we can see the 4G (Black colour) provides a more linear gradual discharge of the battery whereas 5G (Blue colour) a higher discharge rate. We can also see that Battery temperature is also impacted. The graph in Black represents the 5G NSA network whereas the graph on Blue the 4G. This clearly shows the handset has to work harder when downloading content and reaching higher speeds. These results represent some of the initial observations and our team is working on additional tests to provide you more information on different brands of devices, chipsets and Network Operators. Further results will be shared in the coming months with performance on specific devices, chipsets, and Network Operators. Make sure you follow us on Social Media and receive our Newsletters to stay up to date with all our latest insights.

SMARTPHONE TIER: ENTRY Battery Capacity mAh: 5050 Introducing the latest budget Smartphone - can it compete? Smartphone Battery Performance Overall Score: 40/100 Overall Battery Performance Score: Ranking #82 Entry Tier Ranking: Ranking #8 We have listed what you need to know about the Nokia G21 This smartphone comes well equipped with features comparable to other smartphones within this competitive marketplace, with a particularly good battery life highlighted within our battery performance testing. Review our review and see our full test results, translated into ViserMark Labels designed to help you make an informed decision when selecting a smartphone. Smartphone Battery Performance Score and Battery Performance Results Smartphone Battery Performance Overall Score: 40/100 With the Nokia G20 launched nearly over a year ago, the Nokia G21 makes its arrival within the Entry Tier (€0-€199) of budget smartphones. This smartphone faces tough competition within this Entry Tier, especially from better well-known brands such as Xiaomi, Realme and Motorola. However, the Nokia G21 uses Android One, which could be seen as advantageous for users with easy UI and fast updates. As with the Nokia G10, which we tested in our labs earlier this year, the Nokia G21 has exactly the same battery capacity of 5050 mAh. Despite having the same battery capacity, the Nokia G21 achieved an overall battery of 40 out of a possible 100 and was unable to match its processor obtaining 50 as an overall score. Welcome to the Entry Tier Ranking Table Within the Entry Tier Ranking table, (smartphones classified in a price range from €0-€199) the Nokia G21 joins other budget smartphones that have gained some impressive scores when tested by our experts in the SmartViser team for battery performance. The main challengers, to the Nokia G21, are the Oppo A16 and Ulefone Note 11 Pro, both obtaining a score of 39 out of 100 when reviewed in our labs during 2021. All results can be seen in the table below. From our battery performance testing, we have compiled all our testing results and scores during 2021 - 2022. These can be seen here in our Smartphone Ranking 2021/2022 table. Battery Performance Testing and Review - Aug 2022 Product - Good Points The Nokia G21 has the following features: It offers: stylist design good battery life uses Android One extras include a 3.5mm jack, FM radio, NFC, and Dual Sim with MicroSD slot Product - Be Aware of Points The Nokia G21 lacks in performance in the following ways: Max connectivity is 4G lacking camera quality - no ultrawide option can be slow charging the display is slightly below average for brightness Product Features and Specification Release Date: 15th February 2022 Let’s have a look at the Nokia G21 Battery Performance Testing Results in more detail. Overall Battery Performance Results With an average price, of around 189.99 EURO the Nokia G21 performed well during our testing, although perhaps slightly slower than expected for a smartphone with an average battery capacity of 54050 mAh. In our testing, the Nokia G21 achieved the following test results: Battery Performance Score – 40 out of 100 The overall Battery Performance Score is now a global score taking calculations from Battery Life, Power Efficiency and Charging Times. With a score of 40 awarded, the Nokia G21 was placed in 82nd place within our database of all testing scores. Therefore, it is positioned towards the bottom of the overall rankings for battery performance. Full details of our testing results database can be viewed in the ViserMark Smartphone Ranking 2021/22 table. The Average Battery Performance Score of an Entry Tier smartphone is 36.9, so the Nokia G21 indicates a better than average battery performance when tested in our labs. There is a small gap dividing the Nokia G21, just below mid-table with a score of 40 and the Realme 7i positioned in first place with a 62 score when looking closer at the Entry Tier table. Learn more about the testing results from Entry Tier smartphones, by following the link. Battery Life - 2 Days of Use BATTERY LIFE - Days of Use Based on the ViserMark test protocol, the Nokia G21 achieved a score of 2 Days. The Average Day of Use score of an Entry Tier smartphone is 2.2 Day of Use which places the Nokia G21 respectably alongside the Oppo and Motorola brands within this tier of smartphones. As shown on the chart below: When viewing the official specification for the Nokia G21, the manufacturer does state that this smartphone has a 3 Day battery life. This testing is based on their own testing methodology. Our testing environment ensures the following: Based on real smartphone usage from 100% battery level down to Power Off​ The protocol includes common daily life activities, for instance: Calls, Web, Video and Music streaming, Gaming, Social networks, Picture & Video capture, standby​ Performed under strictly controlled test conditions​ All activities are executed in a defined order and timeline Overall, the Nokia G21 with a 5050 mAh battery, did achieve an impressive battery life performance. This reached a top-half ranking of #42 for overall Days of Usage in our database of testing results. More Battery Life testing results from our 2021-2022 database can be viewed, follow this link. CHARGING TIME – 2 Hours and 56 Minutes CHARGING TIME - Hours and Minutes The charging time to 100% was 2 hours and 56 minutes to a full charge. The Average Charging Time for an Entry Tier smartphone is 1 hour and 59 minutes. The Nokia G21 took 2 hours and 59 minutes, so being 1 hour slower than the average charging time for this tier, was disappointing. The charging time for the Nokia G21 just missing out by 1 second of that of the Nokia G10, however, it is still 11 seconds quicker than the Motorola G30, as the chart shows below. It is also worth noting that the Nokia G21 does support 18W fast charging, however, it is boxed with a less powerful 10W adapter. To find out the quickest smartphone charging times during 2021-2022, follow this link. POWER EFFICIENCY – 1 Leaf from a 5 Leaf Rating There are several power-efficient processors, within today's smartphones, that can cope with the growing number of new applications and can support high-resolution displays without compromising battery life. Power Efficiency is calculated using Battery Life and Battery Capacity. This is expressed in “Leaves", reflecting a rating between 1 being the least and 5 being the most power-efficient. The Average Power Efficiency for an Entry Tier smartphone has a rating of 1.8 Leaf. A Power Efficiency Score of 1.0 was given to the Nokia G21, therefore falling short of this battery performance level. From the table shown below, we have the Power Efficiency results shown for the closest challengers of the Nokia G21 within the Entry Tier. You will notice that the Nokia G21 is able to compete well with the Oppo A16 and Ulefone Note 11P which also have a similar battery capacity of 5000 mAh. Once again the Nokia G21 was unable to challenge the Nokia G10, with a power efficiency rating of 2.5 and over the average expected for Entry Tier smartphones. See more smartphone Power Efficiency ratings from our testing database, follow this link. Should I buy it? As a budget smartphone, the Nokia G21 can offer good performance, but when compared with Realme and Motorola smartphones it does fall a little short. Even against the Nokia G10, it is lacking in battery life and power efficiency rating. Despite being stylish in design and having a few satisfying features like FM radio and a MicroSD slot, it does not have an ultrawide camera, which is now an expected feature, even on budget smartphones. With that said the 90Hz refresh capability is noticeable and improves the user experience of this smartphone. Extra Insights ViserMark tests are performed with the strictest protocol in a controlled environment to ensure repetition and consistency powered and automated by SmartViser’s test automation solution viSer. The automation test includes a variety of user actions from calls to social media and periods of standby times. VCX (Valued Camera eXperience) - not available at present The VCX Forum has been working with its members on the system and infrastructure as a non-profit organisation. We strive to improve our technology to develop and exchange accurate and objective quality and performance indicators that are our ultimate goal. We will also serve as a compass for the smartphone camera industry. We appreciate your interest in VCX-Forum. See More Reviews Background From its humble beginning in 1865 as a single paper mill operation, Nokia has found and nurtured success over the years in a range of industrial sectors including cable, paper products, rubber boots, tires, televisions and mobile phones. Nokia’s transition to a primary focus on telecommunications began in the 1990s. The first GSM call was made in 1991 using Nokia equipment. Rapid success in the mobile phone sector allowed Nokia to become by 1998, the best-selling mobile phone brand in the world. Celebrating 30 years of transforming telecommunications Latest Reviews If you're looking for the best smartphone on the market, battery performance is one of the key decisive aspects then ViserMark is for you. ​ Not only does ViserMark offer labels that measure battery performance, translating mAh into direct battery life scores, days of usage, charging times and power efficiency but it is also a highly valuable marketing asset to device manufacturers and end-users. ViserMark is a benchmark to help make better-informed choices when buying a Smartphone. Get all the latest reviews Join our readers to receive the latest update to our smartphone battery performance scores and performance reviews as soon as we finish our testing! If you are a Smartphone Manufacturer and looking to improve the Battery Performance of your Smartphones, please get in touch to discuss how we can help you.

SMARTPHONE TIER: MID Battery Capacity mAh: 4500 Smartphone Battery Performance: Ranking #27 Positioned halfway for Battery Performance within the Mid Tier Ranking Table Battery Performance Testing and Review - October 2021 Product The OnePlus Nord CE smartphone arrives on the market to complete the Nord family, it is the evolution of the OnePlus Nord and has taken the top position within the Nord family. It is an economic option from OnePlus, costing around ''300 EURO” when considering the features offered by the smartphone, including 5G connectivity, Snapdragon chipset & 256 GB of memory. Release Date June 2021 Product Features and Specification · Design: Same than its predecessor given its success. · Rear Camera: 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (Wide), 0.7µm, PDFA 8 MP, f/2.3, 119 ˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP, f/2.4 (depth) · Video: 4K@30fps, 1080@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS · Selfie Camera: 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1.0µm · Video: 1080@30/60fps · Battery: 4500 mAh (30W fast charge, 70% in 30 mins advertised) · Display: 6.43" Fluid AMOLED, 90 Hz · Size: 159.2 mm x 73.5 mm x 7.9 mm · Weight: 170g · Memory: 128GB ROM 6/8GB RAM, 256GB ROM 12GB RAM · Chipset: Qualcomm SM7225 Snapdragon 750G 5G (8 nm) · Android: Android 11, OxygenOS 11.0.5.5 · Software Version: EB2103_16_210610 Battery Performance Introduction In the ViserMark ranking table, the OnePlus Nord CE is classed as a Mid-Tier smartphone (priced between 200 and 500 EURO), with a price of just over 300 EURO, the smartphone offers 5G connectivity and a display working with a 90 Hz refreshing rate. Being powered by the Qualcomm Snapdragon 750 5G, it also has a 4500 mAh battery capacity. The overall Battery Performance Score is now a global score taking calculations from Battery Life, Power Efficiency and Charging Times. Based on our test results, we have given the OnePlus Nord CE Smartphone a ViserMark score of 50/100. This score places the OnePlus Nord CE smartphone in the middle of ViserMark overall ranking, 18 points below the leader that has a (68/100) score. Compared with other Mid-Tier smartphones, the OnePlus Nord CE performs better than direct competitors like the Xiaomi Poco F3, the Oppo A54 5G and the Samsung A52 5G. Testing Results BATTERY LIFE - Days of Use The OnePlus Nord CE autonomy was close to 48 hours with both 90 and 60 Hz refreshing rates as shown in Figure 1. Based on the ViserMark test protocol, the OnePlus Nord CE obtained a Battery Life score of 2 Days of Use. The average Day of Use ViserMark score of Mid-Tier smartphones is “2.0” Days. The OnePlus Nord CE autonomy stands very close to the average autonomy for Mid-Tier smartphones. Test Graphics Our testing is based on real smartphone usage from 100% battery level down to Power Off. When testing Smartphones, the testing protocol includes common daily life activities, for instance: Calls, Web, Video and Music streaming, Gaming, Social networks, Picture & Video capture and standby. All testing is performed under strictly controlled test conditions with all activities being executed in a defined order and timeline. Figure 1. ViserMark Battery Life Test at 60 and 90 Hz refresh rate There are a number of power-efficient processors, within today's Smartphones, that are able to cope with the growing number of new applications and can support high-resolution displays without compromising battery life. Power Efficiency is calculated using Battery Life and Battery Capacity. This is expressed in “Leaves" and reflects a rating between 1 being least and 5 being the most power-efficient. The OnePlus Nord CE obtained an overall Power Efficiency Score of 1.5. The average score for Mid-Tier smartphones is 1.6, power efficiency for the OnePlus Nord CE Smartphone performs similarly to other Mid-Tier smartphones. Best Smartphone for Power Efficiency: Ranking #62 Conclusion The OnePlus Nord CE is a truly competitive Smartphone, offering 5G connectivity and a 90 Hz display at an affordable price. In conclusion, the OnePlus Nord CE battery performance is average compared with other Mid-Tier smartphones. In terms of autonomy, the OnePlus Nord CE is very close to competitors like the Xiaomi Poco F3 and superior to others such as the Samsung A52 5G and the Samsung A51. To climb to the Top of the ViserMark ranking there are improvements in terms of power efficiency to be made. ViserMark tests are performed with the strictest protocol in a controlled environment to ensure repetition and consistency powered and automated by SmartViser’s test automation solution viSer. The automation test includes a variety of user actions from calls to social media and periods of standby times. VCX (Valued Camera eXperience) - not available at present The VCX Forum has been working with its members on the system and infrastructure as a non-profit organisation. We strive to improve our technology to develop and exchange accurate and objective quality and performance indicators that are our ultimate goal. We will also serve as a compass for the smartphone camera industry. We appreciate your interest in VCX-Forum. See More Reviews Background OnePlus Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd., commonly referred to as OnePlus, is a Chinese smartphone manufacturer headquartered in Shenzhen, Guangdong. It was founded by Pete Lau and Carl Pei in December 2013. The company officially serves 34 countries and regions around the world as of July 2018. Latest Reviews If you're looking for the best smartphone on the market, battery performance is one of the key decisive aspects then ViserMark is for you. ​ Not only is ViserMark the first label that measures battery performance, translating mAh into direct battery life scores, but it is also a highly valuable marketing asset to device manufacturers and end-users. ViserMark is a benchmark to help make better-informed choices when buying a Smartphone.

Next Arrival Expected Autumn 2022 We are only just a few weeks away from the official release of the much anticipated Android 13! The final beta update was made available to the Android Apps community on the 13th of July to ensure the apps are ready for the Android upgrade. Google development cycles allow for a new Android version to be released every year. Codenames All Android versions used to come with desert-based codenames from some of the early versions like the Cupcake version 1.5 to the pie Android 9. From Android 10 Google has dropped the desert codename much to everyone’s disappointment and uses the number version instead for marketing purposes. We have listed the Android device codenames in the table below. Here is an awesome infographic for you as well. You must know some of the Android device's codenames. Take a look at our infographic to learn more. Enjoy this cheat sheet! Click on the thumbnail picture to view a large version or request your own version. We do hear through the developers still use them internally and the Android 13 internal code name is Tiramisu. We also discovered that the Android 12 code name was Snow Cone, Android 11 Red Velvet Cake and the Android 10 Quince Tart. So, what’s new on Android 13? The Android Developers site is listing several new features around privacy, notification permissions, and certain productivity features like themed icons together with some new standards update on HDR video, Bluetooth LE (That’s Low Energy), audio and MIDI 2.0 over USB. What we have selected as the Top 5 Features 1) Better Customization In the current Android version, you can choose four wallpaper colours and four basic colours, In Android 13 though you will have a choice of 16 wallpaper colours and 16 basic colours. There will be a selection of Themed icons and it is expanded to include third-party app icons. Google is encouraging more developers to create them. 2) Different Languages Support for Apps For all multilingual Android users, you will now be able to select your language on each app. Simply go to Settings > System > Languages and input and tap on App languages. If you use a different app to communicate with friends and family in a different language you can now customise your app to do so. 3) Bluetooth LE audio support The news we have been waiting for at ViserMark. Android 13 will have Bluetooth LE (Low Energy) Audio and Low Complexity Communications Codec (LC13) support. This will bring reduced power consumption, (Battery life impact) and better audio quality for wireless headphones and earbuds. Rest assured we will be testing this in our ViserMark labs to measure the impact on battery due to this change. 4) New Google Wallet The Google Wallet gets an update. It's now aiming to become your digital wallet with all your payment cards, loyalty cards, hotel keys, vaccine cards, train tickets to official IDs like driving licenses. Some countries have already implemented digital ID cards. Check out the list here All data is meant to be stored on the devices and it's not being shared with Google services. 5) Battery Measures The Android 12 has introduced some drastic battery-saving measures the so-called “PhantomProcesskiller” which is meant to kill background apps process that takes too much power. The Android 13 is implementing a new system that will alert the user in case of an app uses excessive background battery. The notification is only for background apps and not for a foreground (meaning an app you have open). Google has also added an option to disable the phantom process with the toggle in the Developer option allowing those users who rely on their apps' background process to continue interrupted. How can you download Android 13? You will need a Google Pixel phone (Pixel 4 and newer) or another supported device. Google has a list of the available devices click here that are capable of running the beta version. If your device is not listed, you may have to wait a bit longer or register for the beta program by clicking here. Make sure you follow us on Social Media and receive our Newsletters to stay up to date with all our latest insights. If you would like to learn more and arrange a demo and a free trial for your company on viSer test engine that drives all the ViserMark testing and this report get in touch with us.

SMARTPHONE TIER: ENTRY Battery Capacity mAh: 5000 First Entry Tier Smartphone with 90Hz Display Smartphone Battery Performance Overall Score: 32/100 Overall Battery Performance Score: Ranking #90 Entry Tier Ranking: Ranking #11 We have listed what you need to know about the . We take a look at the main features as well as the battery performance. Our test results have been translated into ViserMark Labels designed to help you make an informed decision when selecting a smartphone. Smartphone Battery Performance Score and Battery Performance Results Smartphone Battery Performance Overall Score: 32/100 As a new smartphone to the Entry Tier, Motorola has introduced the Motorola Moto E40 to attract your attention by offering a 90Hz display. With a battery capacity of 5000mAh and a triple set-up camera, how does this smartphone perform within the Entry Tier? Being priced at just under 140 Euros as an inexpensive smartphone. It is protected against dust and splash water according to IP52, therefore is a study device. The Motorola Moto E40 achieved a low battery performance score, reaching a score under 40 shared with another 4 smartphones, only 1 other being from the Entry Tier. All the Battery Performance Scores can be seen in the Smartphone Ranking 2021 table. Entry Tier Ranking Table: Ranking #11 Being ranked #11 in the Entry Tier Ranking table, the Motorola Moto E40 is less competitive than other smartphones within the ranking. Looking at the Entry Tier table below showing the performance score of smartphones tested, the Motorola Moto E40 is the first one for 2022. Although not able to compete with other leading smartphones with scores exceeding the 60s in this Entry Tier, the Motorola Moto E40 does have a lower capacity of 5000mAh compared to 6000mAh as used by them. As displayed within the table below: Battery Performance Testing and Review - October 2021 Product - Good Points The Motorola Moto E40 has been designed as a low-cost smartphone packed with features offering one of the first smartphones within the Entry Tier with a high refresh rate screen The device has protected against dust and water according to IP52 Good battery capacity and offers 4 GB sufficient for a less demanding everyday usage This device is fitted with 2 SIMs and a microSD card can be inserted The Motorola Moto E40 has a fingerprint sensor and Google Assistant is available. The camera gives a good sharpness to pictures for an inexpensive smartphone The Motorola Moto E40 offers a 90Hz display that Samsung or Xiaomi lack in the Entry Tier range of smartphones Product - Be Aware of Points No 5G option available, good connectivity to 4G No NFC is available, like other smartphones within the same Entry Tier No wide-angle camera 3 hours are required to charge the battery to full 10 Watt charging Product Features and Specification Release Date October 2021 Let’s have a look at the review by ViserMark based on the results during testing. You can find the full results of our battery performance testing below: Overall Battery Performance Being powered by the Unisoc processor, the Motorola Moto E40 performs well as a low-cost smartphone. In our testing, this device achieved the following test results: Battery Performance Score – 32 out of 100 The overall Battery Performance Score is now a global score taking calculations from Battery Life, Power Efficiency and Charging Times. Based on the battery performance testing results, this smartphone received a ViserMark score of 32/100. With this score, the Motorola Moto E40 is ranked #11 towards the bottom of the Entry Tier table. BATTERY LIFE - Days of Use Based on the ViserMark test protocol, the Motorola Moto E40 achieved a score of 1.5 days. The Average Day of Use ViserMark score of an Entry Tier smartphone is “2.2” Day of Use which places the Motorola Moto E40 below the average and gains a ranking of #90 for the overall smartphone Day of Usage score. The best smartphones have a lifespan of 4 days as shown in the table below. You can see that there is a range of manufacturers trying to achieve the Wiko Power U20 4 Days of Usage - it remains ranked #1. The Motorola Moto E40 joins many Entry Tier smartphones that have managed to reach 1.5 Days of Usage and joins a very competitive area of the Entry Tier, as highlighted below. This device offers a reliable battery life, although there are more powerful alternatives CHARGING TIME – Hours and Minutes CHARGING TIME - Hours and Minutes The charging time to 100% was 3 hours and 7 minutes, 10W charging. The Motorola Moto E40 takes some time to power up to the full battery, exceeding 3 hours, and matches the charging time for the Realme 7i. However, the Oppo A5 and Xiaomi Redmi 9 both have slightly longer charging times. To see the charging times of all the smartphones tested so far, please view the Charge Times Ranking table. From the table shown below, all the Entry Tier smartphones take longer to charge. Within the Entry Tier range, the average charging time is 1 hour 46 minutes. It is interesting to see that the previous Motorola device, the G30 is also below the average charging time. However, improvements have been made within the G7 and G8 series, with considerable faster charging times, as the table shows below. Currently, the Motorola Moto G7 has the fastest charging time within the Entry Tier. POWER EFFICIENCY – 5 Leaf Rating There are several power-efficient processors, within today's smartphones, that can cope with the growing number of new applications and can support high-resolution displays without compromising battery life. Power Efficiency is calculated using Battery Life and Battery Capacity. This is expressed in “Leaves", reflecting a rating between 1 being the least and 5 being the most power-efficient. The Motorola Moto E40 obtained an overall Power Efficiency Score of 0.5 Should I buy It? In conclusion, the Motorola Moto E40 is an appealing low-cost smartphone. Although it has many good features like the IP52 protection, and large battery capacity there are some major ones missing such as NFC. Extra Insights ViserMark tests are performed with the strictest protocol in a controlled environment to ensure repetition and consistency powered and automated by SmartViser’s test automation solution viSer. The automation test includes a variety of user actions from calls to social media and periods of standby times. VCX (Valued Camera eXperience) The VCX Forum has been working with its members on the system and infrastructure as a non-profit organisation. We strive to improve our technology to develop and exchange accurate and objective quality and performance indicators that are our ultimate goal. We will also serve as a compass for the smartphone camera industry. We appreciate your interest in VCX-Forum. No VCX reviews are available for this smartphone. Background Motorola created the mobile communications industry. They have invented most of the protocols and technologies that make mobile communications possible, including the first mobile phone, the first base station and pretty much everything else in between. Today, Motorola is combining that pioneering spirit with a renewed commitment to consumers. That’s why their phones run on Android, the world's most popular operating system. Android brings the openness that shaped the Internet to the mobile world. That’s also why they are the first company to bring smartphone production back to the USA and allow people to customise their own phone design. For the past 80 years, their engineers have thrived on invention; on finding new ways to solve problems. Today Motorola continue to look for new opportunities to change people’s lives for the better through the magic of mobility. Latest Reviews If you're looking for the best smartphone on the market, battery performance is one of the key decisive aspects then ViserMark is for you. ​ Not only is ViserMark the first label that measures battery performance, translating mAh into direct battery life scores, but it is also a highly valuable marketing asset to device manufacturers and end-users. ViserMark is a benchmark to help make better-informed choices when buying a Smartphone. Get all the latest reviews Join our readers to receive the latest update to our smartphone battery performance scores and performance reviews as soon as we finish our testing! If you are a Smartphone Manufacturer and looking to improve the Battery Performance of your Smartphones, please get in touch to discuss how we can help you.

SMARTPHONE TIER: MID Battery Capacity mAh: 5000 A New Addition To The Redmi Note Series Smartphone Battery Performance Overall Score: 50/100 Overall Battery Performance Score: Ranking #30 Mid Tier Ranking: Ranking #8a We have listed what you need to know about the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S has arrived and we take a look at the main features as well as the battery performance. Our test results have been translated into ViserMark Labels designed to help you make an informed decision when selecting a smartphone. Smartphone Battery Performance Score and Battery Performance Results Smartphone Battery Performance Overall Score: 50/100 Just like the rest of the Redmi Note Series, the Redmi Note 11S is powered by 5000mAh. The Redmi Note 11S has the same battery and chipset as the Redmi Note 11S Pro. The Redmi Note 11S ranks considerable well compared to all tested smartphones with a Battery Performance Score of 50/100. Both the Samsung A32 5G and the OnePlus Nord CE match with the same score within the Mid Tier range. Looking at the other tiers, only the Samsung S20 FE 5G within the High Tier has a score of 50/100, likewise, the Motorola Moto G30 and the Nokia G10 also achieved the same score being in the Entry Tier. As shown within the table below. All the Battery Performance Scores can be seen in the Smartphone Ranking 2021 table. Mid Tier Ranking Table: Within the Mid Tier Ranking table, Redmi Note 11S has joined a very competitive range of smartphones, as shown in the table below. With 7 devices achieving the same score of 50 tested during 2019 - 2022, Xi, Redmi Note 11S has managed to match the Samsung A32 5G and OnePlus Nord CE both most recently released. All Mid Tier Battery Performance Scores can be seen in the Mid Tier Ranking 2021/2022 table. Battery Performance Testing and Review - April 2022 Product - Good Points The Redmi Note 11S follows on from the Redmi Note 10S, it brings a couple of included or improved features. It offers: battery life and fast charging attractive design excellent 90Hz display refresh rate increased RAM includes a higher-resolution 108MP camera splash-resistant smartphone (IP53-rated) standalone microSD slot 3.5mm audio jack IR port FM radio Product - Be Aware of Points The Redmi Note 11S lacks in performance and features in the following ways: more expensive than Redmi Note 10S not a fast smartphone lacking in performance many Redmi Note 11 versions introduced weaker graphics Android 12 is not included 4K video capturing has a not been included only has a virtual sensor Product Features and Specification Release Date February 2022 Let’s have a look at the review by ViserMark based on the results during testing. You can find the full results of our battery performance testing below: Overall Battery Performance With an average price, of just over 220 EURO, the Redmi Note 11S is classed as a good Mid Tier smartphone, although one that you probably wouldn't want to play games on. In our testing, Redmi Note 11S achieved the following test results: Battery Performance Score – 50 out of 100 The overall Battery Performance Score is now a global score taking calculations from Battery Life, Power Efficiency and Charging Times. Based on the battery performance testing results, this smartphone received a ViserMark score of 50/100. With this score, the Redmi Note 11S smartphone is ranked #30 overall achieving a satisfactory performance score, as seen in the ViserMark Smartphone Ranking 2021/22 table. When looking at the Redmi Note 11S within the Mid Tier, it has reached 50/100 with its performance score. Even with its higher 5000mAh battery capacity, like the Samsung A32 5G with the same battery capacity, the Oneplus Nord CE reached 50/100 as well with a lower battery capacity of 4500mAh. BATTERY LIFE - Days of Use Based on the ViserMark test protocol, the Redmi Note 11S achieved a score of 2 days. The Average Day of Use ViserMark score of a Mid Tier smartphone is “1.9” Day of Use which places the Redmi Note 11S just above the average and towards the top half of the Day of Usage table and gains a ranking of #42 for overall smartphone Day of Usage score. The best smartphones have a lifespan of 4 days as shown in the table below. You can see that there is a range of manufacturers trying to achieve the Wiko Power U20 4 Days of Usage - it remains ranked #1. The Redmi Note 11S joins many Mid Tier smartphones that have managed to reach 2 Days of Usage and joins a very competitive area of the Mid Tier, as highlighted below. The Redmi Note 11S does offer a dependable battery life, although there are more powerful alternatives, therefore is well-positioned in ranking order of #42in Days of Usage. CHARGING TIME – Hours and Minutes CHARGING TIME - Hours and Minutes The charging time to 100% was just 53 minutes. 66W SuperCharge is available. The Redmi Note 11S finds well amongst the top ten fastest charging smartphones tested so far, as seen in the Charge Times Ranking table. Having reached the under 1-hour charging barrier, it joins many of the OnePlus and Oppo smartphone manufacturers, all offering some very impressive and extremely fast charging times. The Redmi Note 11S gained an overall ranking of #14, a good performance, with an average battery capacity of 5000mAh. The average Charging Time is 1:39 for a Smartphone within the ViserMark Mid Tier. The Redmi Note 11S delivers 0.53 minutes of charging time, matching that of the OnePlus Nord CE and just ahead of the Realme 8 Pro. The graph shown below shows the Charging Times as well as the battery Days of Usage. As you can see the Redmi Note 11S and the OnePlus Nord CE have the same performance results for both Charging Times of 53 minutes and 2 Days of Usage. The Realme 8 Pro still achieves better Days of Usage with 2.5 days, despite having a slightly slower Charge Time of 55 minutes, while the quickest charging times are often hampered with lower Days of usage, as shown with the OnePlus Nord 2. The Redmi Note 11S does offer 33W fast charging and is shipped with a power adapter, so you can charge it straight away. It does compete well as a Mid Tier smartphone and is in the overall Top 10 of fastest Charging Times -see our Charging Times Table POWER EFFICIENCY – 5 Leaf Rating There are several power-efficient processors, within today's smartphones, that can cope with the growing number of new applications and can support high-resolution displays without compromising battery life. Power Efficiency is calculated using Battery Life and Battery Capacity. This is expressed in “Leaves", reflecting a rating between 1 being the least and 5 being the most power-efficient. The Redmi Note 11S obtained an overall Power Efficiency Score of 1.0. The average score for a Mid Tier smartphone is 1.6, meaning the Redmi Note 11S is just below the average in our power efficiency ViserMark Power Efficiency ranking table. From the table shown below, we have taken the previous graph showing the Mid Tier performance results of Charging Times and Days of Usage and now introduce the Power Efficiency results. These are highlighted in green. The Redmi Note 11S does achieve 1.0, as many of the Mid Tier smartphones as a Rating for Power Efficiency. What is interesting to see, is the contrast between Charging Times and Days of Use. From the graph shown above the Redmi Note 11S can perform considerably well, with 2 Days of Usage as well as a fast-charging time of 53 minutes. However, its predecessor the Redmi Note 10 matches both Days of Usage and Power Efficiency, the Charging Time was 1 hour and 17 minutes. Therefore, to conclude Xiaomi smartphones, have made developments in design and performance as shown with the Redmi Note 11S. Although only maintaining, not improving Days of Usage and Power Efficiency, a much quicker charging time has been delivered. Should I buy it? In conclusion, the Redmi Note 11S is a good smartphone, with excellent battery capacity. Although perhaps a little overpriced, when compared to other Mid Tier smartphones, the Poco F3 provides the same offering with 49/100 Battery Score Performance, slightly slower Charging Times, yet less expensive. Within the Mid Tier area, smartphones find it difficult to stand out above the rest, the Redmi Note 11S has seen improved Charging Times but has lacked to develop Days of Usage to be able to be competitive with several other Mid Tier smartphones that are regularly achieving 2 plus Days of Uasge. Extra Insights ViserMark tests are performed with the strictest protocol in a controlled environment to ensure repetition and consistency powered and automated by SmartViser’s test automation solution viSer. The automation test includes a variety of user actions from calls to social media and periods of standby times. VCX (Valued Camera eXperience) The VCX Forum has been working with its members on the system and infrastructure as a non-profit organisation. We strive to improve our technology to develop and exchange accurate and objective quality and performance indicators that are our ultimate goal. We will also serve as a compass for the smartphone camera industry. We appreciate your interest in VCX-Forum. No VCX reviews are available for this smartphone. See More Reviews Background Xiaomi was founded in 2010 by serial entrepreneur Lei Jun, who believes that high-quality technology doesn't need to cost a fortune. Is focused on being the most user-centric mobile internet company. With more than 61 million handsets sold in 2014 and products launched in Taiwan, Hong Kong, Singapore, Malaysia, Philippines, India, Indonesia and Brazil, Xiaomi is expanding its footprint across the world to become a global brand. Xiaomi is headquartered in Beijing, China and has offices in Asia-Pacific, India, and Brazil. Latest Reviews If you're looking for the best smartphone on the market, battery performance is one of the key decisive aspects then ViserMark is for you. ​ Not only is ViserMark the first label that measures battery performance, translating mAh into direct battery life scores, but it is also a highly valuable marketing asset to device manufacturers and end-users. ViserMark is a benchmark to help make better-informed choices when buying a Smartphone. Get all the latest reviews Join our readers to receive the latest update to our smartphone battery performance scores and performance reviews as soon as we finish our testing! If you are a Smartphone Manufacturer and looking to improve the Battery Performance of your Smartphones, please get in touch to discuss how we can help you.