top of page
  • Debbie Bouffler

Samsung Galaxy A35 5G - Smartphone Review

Updated: May 14

SMARTPHONE TIER: MID TIER

Battery Capacity mAh: 5000


Samsung Galaxy A35 5G Review: Unveiling an Affordable and Feature-Rich Smartphone


 

Smartphone Battery Performance


ViserMark Labels for the Samsung Galaxy A35

Based on Price:

Mid Tier (€200-€499) 

Ranking #4



Video Review

It will be available shortly.





 

What you need to know about the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G smartphone.


Quick Summary


The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G was released in March this year and still looks very much like its predecessor, the Samsung Galaxy A34. It is an outstanding and affordable choice for those seeking a budget-friendly smartphone (Mid Tier price range €200-€499). 


This smartphone offers a new dual-glass design with Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ for protection. It is IP67-rated dust and water resistant. It has several high-end features, including a vibrant 6.6-inch Super AMOLED display offering an immersive viewing experience, complemented by a smooth 120Hz refresh rate.  


Like the Samsung Galaxy A55, the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has a solid feel and features Samsung's typical rounded rectangle shape with flat edges, giving it a premium look. The smartphone's performance is robust. It is powered by an Exynos 1380 system on a chip (SoC) and has 6GB of RAM and 128GB of internal storage, which is expandable via microSD, catering well to media enthusiasts.


For the photography enthusiasts, there is a versatile triple camera setup, which includes a 50MP primary camera with optical image stabilisation (OIS), an 8MP wide-angle camera, and a 5MP macro camera. However, it doesn't have a telephoto camera. The front-facing selfie camera is 13MP and for video capture, the Samsung Galaxy A35 can record up to 4K at 30fps for both front and rear cameras.


The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has a powerful 5,000mAh battery that can last for at least 1.5 days of regular usage, making it perfect for day-to-day activities even under heavy use. While it supports up to 25W wired charging, it does not support wireless or reverse wireless charging.


Equipped with impressive connectivity,the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G features, 5G, Bluetooth 5.3, and NFC, making it future-proof and enhancing its usability. The smartphone also has Samsung's One UI, which provides a clean and user-friendly interface and supports four years of operating system updates and five years of security updates. It is also noteworthy that the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G is the first smartphone in the Galaxy A Series to feature Samsung's security suite Knox, which provides protection against hardware and software attacks. However, if you are looking for advanced AI functionality, you may want to consider Samsung's Flagship/Pro options.


The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G stands out as being budget-friendly. It offers a well-rounded package that combines great display, solid performance, and excellent connectivity options. It is a compelling choice for budget-conscious users looking for a dependable, future-ready smartphone.


 

Specification Overview - Released Date: March 2024


  • Body: 161.7 x 78.0 x 8.2 mm or 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches. Weight 209g.

  • Display: 6.60 inch Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 1000 nits (peak), 1080 x 2340 resolution

  • Protection: Corning® Gorilla® Glass Victus. Plastic frame, IP67 dust/water rated.

  • Operating System: Android 14, One UI 6.1.

  • Chipset: Exynos 1380 (5 nm): Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)

  • Memory: 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM; 256GB 12GB RAM; microSDXC

  • Connectivity: 5G; Hybrid Dual SIM; Wi-Fi 6; BT 5.3; NFC; stereo speakers

  • Rear Camera: Wide (main): 50 MP, f/1.8, 1/1.96", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS; Ultra wide angle: 8 MP, f/2.2, 123-degree, 1/4.0", 1.12µm; Macro: 5 MP, f/2.4

  • Front Camera: 13 MP, f/2.2, 1/3.06", 1.12µm

  • Video: Front camera: 4K@30fps, 1080p@30, Rear camera: 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS

  • Battery: 5000 mAh, 25W wired

  • Colours: Iceblue, Lilac, Navy, and Lemon.

  • Others: NFC: Yes. Loudspeaker: Yes. Side Fingerprint Sensor, accelerometer, gyro, compass


Good Points

Not So Good Points

  • Vibrant AMOLED display with 120Hz

  • Lacks fast charging

  • Battery life of 1.5 days of use

  • No headphone jack

  • Versatile camera performance

  • No charger in the box

  • Good quality stereo speakers

  • No HDR support for video capture

  • 5G connectivity

  • No AI functionality

Button with a link to the Samsung Galaxy A35
 

Pricing

Samsung Galaxy A35 Smartphone

Samsung Galaxy A35 5G



Amazon UK Logo

Amazon DE Logo

Amazon FR Logo



These prices are the best from our Affiliate Partners. As an Amazon Associate, we may earn commissions from qualifying purchases from Amazon.com. You can learn more about our disclosure policy here.

 

Smartphone Battery Performance - FULL REVIEW


ViserMark offers a comprehensive range of battery performance test results based on different criteria and benchmarks for evaluating a smartphone's performance. Our tests are performed using the strictest protocol in a controlled environment to ensure repetition and consistency powered by SmartViser's test automation solution viSer.

 

VWS Analytics Studio is a complementary product to the viSer Test Automation solution and provides an enhanced viSer user experience. It is the fastest way to analyse and view smartphone test results. We have used the interactive dashboard to show you the recent test results for the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G and comparative smartphones.

 










 

Samsung Galaxy A35 5G ViserMark Labels


ViserMark's Battery Performance review is based on the smartphone battery performance results obtained during testing. The ViserMark labels provide valuable insights into the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G's battery performance.


ViserMark Labels for the Samsung Galaxy A35 smartphone

Reading this review, you can find a full breakdown of our battery performance results in these sections.





Also of Interest: ViserMark Labels




 

1. Battery Performance


What is the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G Performance Score?


ViserMark Label for Battery Performance for the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G smartphone

In our comprehensive testing, the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G achieved a ViserMark Battery Performance score of 42 out of 100.




How does the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G compare to Mid Tier smartphones?


Test results for the battery performance scores of the Samsung Galaxy A35, Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 PRO 5G, and Samsung Galaxy A55, show that despite all having a battery capacity of 5000mAh, there is a notable difference in performance scores.


The Samsung Galaxy A55 leads with a performance score of 47. This suggests that for the same battery capacity, this smartphone provides more efficient energy management, potentially offering longer battery life or more power-intensive features.


A Bar Chart showing the battery performance comparison for the Samsung Galaxy A35 smartphone

The Samsung Galaxy A35 and the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 PRO 5G both score 42, indicating a similarity in performance between the two. This could suggest that factors other than battery life, such as camera quality, software, and brand preference, will play a significant role in the purchasing decision for users.


Also of Interest: Have you missed this smartphone review?


 
A graphic image of a smartphone wearing a gold medal with a blue ribbon

All smartphones are thoroughly tested and verified by SmartViser. Every smartphone has a review written by ViserMark, which provides all the battery performance test results translated into ViserMark Labels. 


Also of Interest:


 

2. Battery Life


How long will the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G battery last?


A ViserMark Label for battery life for the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G smartphone

The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G test results indicate a battery life of 1.5 days, or 38 hours, on a single charge.





How does the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G compare to Mid Tier smartphones?


The battery life test results for the Samsung Galaxy A35, Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 PRO 5G, and Samsung Galaxy A55 reveal that the Samsung Galaxy A55 has an impressive 2 full days of use, which is significantly better than the other two smartphones. This suggests that the Samsung Galaxy A55 not only has an optimised battery performance but also excels in real-life usage scenarios. It indicates a well-balanced phone that could cater to heavy users who require a phone that can keep up with their demanding lifestyle without the constant need for charging.

A bar chart detailing the battery life results for the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G smartphone

Both the Samsung Galaxy A35 and the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 PRO 5G show identical days of use (1.5 days), showing a competitive match in daily battery life. This day-to-day use might reflect similarly efficient operating systems and power management strategies. However, these smartphones offer strong performance for more average users, who want a balance between capability and endurance.

 

3. NEW BATTERY CONSUMPTION

 Samsung Galaxy A35 5G battery review with viSer and VWS Analytics Studio


The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G battery life details, as analysed using SmartViser's viSer and VWS Analytics Studio, provide a technical and detailed perspective on the smartphone's battery consumption. The platform's capability to monitor and access real-time test results explains how the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G manages power under various daily user tasks.


ViserMark can identify the strengths and weaknesses of smartphones by comparing battery usage across similar devices, enabling potential buyers to choose the best smartphone based on their usage patterns.


We compare the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G's energy consumption with the industry's average Mid Tier (€200-€499) smartphones across a range of everyday activities to see how it performs in milliampere hours (mAh).


The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G consumes more energy when using social media apps compared to the Mid Tier average. This means that users who frequently use social media apps may experience quicker battery drainage. Social media platforms require more resources due to multimedia content. However, the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G is more efficient than the Mid Tier average when it comes to web browsing. This suggests a well-optimised browsing experience, which is likely due to efficient software management. Users who prioritise web browsing over other activities might find the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G more appealing.


A bar chart detailing the battery consumption test results for the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G smartphone vs the average mid tier smartphone

Battery Consumption Results provided by viSer developed SmartViser.


Having a mixed performance when it comes to battery energy consumption, the Samsung Galaxy A35 will be well-suited for heavy web browsers, but it may not be the best choice for busy social media users. However, its camera efficiency could be a highlight for photography enthusiasts. The battery life is lower than average, but the device manages power well. These insights should help potential users align their usage patterns when considering a new smartphone.


 

Analysing Battery Efficiency:

Samsung Galaxy A35 5G vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 PRO 5G Smartphone Comparison


Reviewing the test results for the Samsung Galaxy A35 and Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 PRO 5G's energy consumption across various tasks, here are the key observations and insights.


The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G and the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 PRO 5G have similar energy consumption rates for social media, with the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G consuming slightly more energy. However, for outgoing calls and SMS, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 PRO 5G shows higher consumption rates. This could imply that this smartphone may not be as efficient for users who primarily use their phones for communication.


A bar chart detailing the battery consumption test results for the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G smartphone vs the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 PRO smartphone

Battery Consumption Results provided by viSer developed SmartViser.


The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G and the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 PRO 5G differ in energy consumption when using the camera and media playback. The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G is more energy-efficient when using the camera, while the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 PRO 5G consumes nearly twice as much energy. However, for media playback, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 PRO 5G is more efficient. 


If you prioritise photography, the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G might be the better choice for you. On the other hand, if you consume a lot of media, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 PRO 5G could be the ideal option.


When it comes to gaming, both smartphones have similar energy consumption rates, meaning that users can expect similar battery drain rates when gaming. However, the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G consumes more power during download/upload suggesting that the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 PRO 5G might be a better choice for users engaging in data transfer.


To sum up, although both smartphones have their strengths, the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G appears to have a slight advantage in terms of battery efficiency and overall battery life. This may make it a more appealing choice for users looking for a well-rounded phone that can handle various tasks without requiring frequent charging.

 










 

Analysing Battery Efficiency:

Samsung Galaxy A35 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Smartphone Comparison


Evaluating the energy consumption of the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G compared to the Samsung Galaxy A55 across various activities, the chart below reveals the following insights.


A bar chart comparing the battery consumption of the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G smartphone vs the Samsung Galaxy A55 5G smartphone

Battery Consumption Results provided by viSer developed SmartViser.


The Samsung Galaxy A55 is more energy-efficient than the Samsung Galaxy A35 for social media and communication tasks. It consumes significantly less battery when using social media and making outgoing calls. This suggests that the Samsung Galaxy A55 could be better suited for people who communicate and use social media more frequently, likely reflecting a younger demographic that values constant connectivity and online presence.


Gamers and multimedia enthusiasts would also benefit from the Samsung Galaxy A55’s lower energy consumption. It shows a slight but important reduction in energy usage when used for gaming, which could translate to longer play sessions. The difference is more pronounced with media playback, where the Samsung Galaxy A55’s efficiency shines. This makes it ideal for users who consume a lot of video content. Interestingly, both smartphones have identical energy consumption when the camera is used. This suggests that the camera hardware and software are very similar across these models.


The Samsung Galaxy A55 is an excellent smartphone for those prioritising extended battery life. It offers superior energy efficiency for most common tasks, making it an attractive option for users. On the other hand, the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G also offers reasonable battery life but is less efficient than the Samsung Galaxy A55. This performance and battery life combination may appeal to power users with high daily phone demands, and have a more flexible budget.


 
A smartphone wearing a gold medal with an orange ribbon

All smartphones are thoroughly tested and verified by SmartViser. Every smartphone has a review written by ViserMark, which provides all the battery performance test results translated into ViserMark Labels. 


Also of Interest:

 

Analysing Battery Efficiency:

Samsung Galaxy A35 5G Overall Smartphone Comparison


Finally, we can see all the comparing battery consumption test results across a range of tasks for the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 PRO 5G, Samsung Galaxy A55, and the Mid Tier average, we can uncover several interesting patterns, as shown in the chart below.


A bar chart detailing all the battery consumption test results for the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G smartphone

Battery Consumption Results provided by viSer developed SmartViser.


The Samsung Galaxy A55 shows exceptional efficiency, outperforming the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G and Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 PRO 5G, and the average Mid Tier smartphone in almost all tasks. Its optimisation is particularly impressive in social media and download/upload tasks, making it a great choice for users who engage in data-intensive activities or frequently use social media.


The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G and Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 PRO 5G are closely matched in most tasks, with the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G consuming slightly more power across the board, except for camera use, where the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 PRO 5G is less efficient. Users who prefer Xiaomi's interface or additional features may still consider the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 PRO 5G. Still, the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has an advantage for those prioritising battery efficiency.


Interestingly, but unsurprisingly, the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G and Samsung Galaxy A55 have identical energy consumption for camera use, despite the Samsung Galaxy A55's overall efficiency. This suggests that camera usage isn't a deciding factor between these two phones, although there may be a price to consider.


With energy consumption above the Mid Tier average in most tasks, the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G may be less appealing to cost and energy-conscious users. However, it still delivers a respectable average battery life of 38 hours, indicating effective power management when idle or during light phone usage.


The Samsung Galaxy A55's superior battery life makes it an excellent choice for power users, tech enthusiasts, and those who use their smartphones extensively throughout the day. On the other hand, the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G and Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 PRO 5G offer a competitive choice for moderate phone users who prioritise other features, including price over battery efficiency.


 

4. Power Efficiency


What is the Battery Efficiency of the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G?


ViserMark Label for battery efficiency for the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G smartphone

The battery efficiency for the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G was 0.5 leaf out of 5.





How does the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G compare to Mid Tier smartphones?


Looking at the battery efficiency scores provided for the Samsung Galaxy A35, Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 PRO 5G, and Samsung Galaxy A55, the battery efficiency score underlines the importance of software optimisation over hardware specifications. While all three smartphones have the same battery capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A55 has slightly more efficiency,

A bar chart detailing the battery efficiency comparison for the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G smartphone

Smartphones with higher efficiency typically experience less battery degradation. This means that Samsung Galaxy A55 may offer a longer lifespan, which could appeal to those who keep their smartphones longer.


Also of Interest:

 

5. Annual Energy Consumption


How much energy does the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G use?


ViserMark Label for Annual Energy Consumption for the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G smartphone

The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has a moderate energy consumption of 4.3 kWh annually.





How does the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G compare to Mid Tier smartphones?


The Samsung Galaxy A55 has the lowest annual energy consumption at 3.3 kWh, while the Samsung Galaxy A35 has an annual consumption of 4.3 kWh. This reinforces Samsung's commitment to developing eco-friendly technologies that reduce the environmental footprint without sacrificing performance.


The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 PRO 5G shows the highest energy consumption at 4.6 kWh annually. This indicates that while the handset may match its competitors regarding battery capacity and efficiency, its energy demands over a year are higher, potentially due to less optimised power management or more energy-intensive components.

A bar chart comparing the annual energy consumption of the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G smartphone

 

VERDICT:


What is it like to Use?


The battery performance of the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G can shape the user's experience. The smartphone has different battery consumption rates for various activities.


Here are some possible perceptions of this smartphone by its users:

  • Social media enthusiasts may face high battery consumption during usage.

  • The smartphone offers a fair experience for traditional communication.

  • It provides average performance in gaming and streaming activities.

  • The camera's energy consumption is lower than some of its competitors.

  • Its overall battery management suggests that the phone can last 1.5 days of use on a single charge, making it an attractive option for the average consumer.


What's in the box?


  • Samsung Galaxy A35 5G Smartphone

  • USB-C-to-C cable

  • SIM Tool

  • User Guide


Should I buy the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G?


Buyers of the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G should consider its battery life, camera efficiency, and balanced user experience. It strikes a middle ground that could attract a broad user base, from casual gamers to those using their phone for conventional tasks.


This smartphone's longer-than-average battery life and budget-friendly price tag make it an attractive choice for light users and budget-conscious consumers. The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G may also appeal to working professionals and students who require a reliable smartphone for communication, scheduling, and light media consumption.


 

Extra Insights


Q: Does the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G support 5G?

Yes, it does

Q: Does the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G have dual-SIM capabilities?

What storage and RAM variants are available for the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G?

Q: Does the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G have stereo speakers?

Q: Does the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G have a microSD card slot?

Q: Is the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G VoLTE enabled?


 

Pricing

Samsung Galaxy A35 Smartphone

Samsung Galaxy A35 5G



Amazon UK Logo

Amazon DE Logo

Amazon FR Logo



These prices are the best from our Affiliate Partners. As an Amazon Associate, we may earn commissions from qualifying purchases from Amazon.com. You can learn more about our disclosure policy here.


 

VCX (Valued Camera eXperience)

The VCX Forum has been working with its members on the system and infrastructure as a non-profit organisation. We strive to improve our technology to develop and exchange accurate and objective quality and performance indicators, which is our ultimate goal. We will also serve as a compass for the smartphone camera industry. We appreciate your interest in the VCX Forum.


No VCX reviews are available for this smartphone.

 

 










 

Background


The Samsung Group is a South Korean multinational conglomerate headquartered in Samsung Town, Seoul. It comprises numerous affiliated businesses, most united under the Samsung brand. Samsung Electronics has assembly plants and sales networks in 74 countries and employs around 290,000 people. Samsung is a major manufacturer of electronic components such as lithium-ion batteries, semiconductors, image sensors, camera modules and displays for clients such as Apple, Sony, HTC and Nokia.


 

Get all the latest reviews.


Join our readers to receive the latest update to our smartphone battery performance scores and performance reviews as soon as we finish testing!







 

If you are a Smartphone Manufacturer looking to improve your smartphone's battery Performance, don't hesitate to contact us to discuss how we can help you.

 

Written By:


A head and shoulder photo of Debbie Bouffler

Debbie Bouffler is the Marketing and Communications Manager at SmartViser. She plays a crucial role in developing communication and marketing strategies for the company. Debbie has gained extensive experience in strategic business development and marketing in various industries, which has helped her excel in her current position at SmartViser.


Debbie is a leader with imagination, an unmatched drive, and an infectious passion for growth and excellence, especially in the telecommunications industry.


For further insights into her professional journey or to connect, visit Debbie on LinkedIn.


 

Affiliate Disclosure:

These prices are the best from our Affiliate Partners. As an Amazon Associate, we may earn commissions from qualifying purchases from Amazon.com. You can learn more about our disclosure policy here.

 

Recent Posts

See All

Comments

Rated 0 out of 5 stars.
No ratings yet

Add a rating
bottom of page