Search Results

SMARTPHONE TIER: ETRY TIER Battery Capacity mAh: 6000 Xiaomi Redmi A7 Pro: Big Battery, Bigger Compromises SMARTPHONE BATTERY PERFORMANCE Based on Price: Entry Tier (€0-€199) Entry Tier Ranking # 4 Learn more: Quick Summary ViserMark Labels Specifications Know the Test Results ViserMark Verdict Video Review - Soon Available The Xiaomi Redmi A7 Pro is an entry-level smartphone designed to deliver a reliable and accessible mobile experience without pushing into higher price tiers. Rather than focusing on advanced performance or premium materials, Xiaomi prioritises practicality, long battery life, and a large display, making the device particularly appealing to first-time smartphone users and those who simply need a dependable everyday companion. The result is a phone that emphasises usability and endurance over technical ambition, offering solid value within the budget segment. In terms of design, the Redmi A7 Pro follows a clean and straightforward aesthetic with minimal visual clutter. The device features a large 6.9-inch LCD display with a resolution of 1600 by 720 pixels, resulting in a pixel density of approximately 254 pixels per inch. While this does not deliver the sharpness of higher-resolution panels, the screen compensates with a smooth refresh rate of up to 120 Hz, which enhances scrolling fluidity and general responsiveness. Brightness levels reach up to 800 nits in high-brightness mode, ensuring reasonable visibility outdoors, though contrast and colour depth remain typical of budget LCD technology. The flat display design contributes to ease of use, reducing accidental touches and maintaining a practical, user-friendly experience. Physically, the Redmi A7 Pro measures approximately 171.5 millimetres in height, 79.5 millimetres in width, and 8.15 millimetres in thickness, with a weight of around 208 grams. This makes it noticeably larger and heavier than many mid-range devices, largely due to its expansive display and high-capacity battery. The construction relies on plastic for both the frame and rear panel, but the finish is well-executed and durable enough for everyday handling. The overall design is simple yet modern, with colour options such as Black, Blue, and Green adding a subtle sense of variety without straying into overly bold styling. Performance is handled by the Unisoc T7250 chipset, built on a 12-nanometre process. This processor is paired with 4 GB of RAM and either 64 GB or 128 GB of internal storage, using LPDDR4X memory and UFS 2.2 storage technology. While these specifications position the phone firmly in the entry-level category, they are sufficient for typical daily tasks such as messaging, web browsing, video streaming, navigation, and social media use. The experience remains smooth in light workloads, though the device is not intended for demanding applications or intensive gaming. Memory expansion features allow part of the storage to be used as virtual RAM, providing modest assistance with multitasking, while a microSD slot enables further storage expansion. Photography is a secondary focus for the Redmi A7 Pro . The rear camera system consists of a 13-megapixel main sensor with an f/2.2 aperture, accompanied by an auxiliary sensor used for depth or basic imaging assistance. In favourable lighting conditions, the main camera is capable of producing acceptable images with natural colours and adequate detail for casual use. However, performance declines in low-light environments, where noise and reduced sharpness become more apparent. The front-facing 8-megapixel camera supports standard features such as HDR and portrait mode, delivering serviceable results for video calls and occasional selfies. Video recording is limited to 1080p at 30 frames per second, reflecting the device’s entry-level positioning. Battery performance is one of the Redmi A7 Pro ’s strongest attributes. The phone is equipped with a large 6000 mAh battery, which comfortably supports a full day and often extends into a second day of moderate usage. This makes it particularly well suited to users who prioritise longevity and reliability over charging speed. Charging is handled via USB Type-C with support for 15-watt wired charging. While this is sufficient for gradual top-ups, it is noticeably slower than the fast-charging solutions offered by many mid-range devices, and the absence of a bundled charger in some markets may be a consideration. Connectivity and features remain practical and comprehensive for the category. The Redmi A7 Pro supports dual SIM functionality, 4G LTE networks, Wi-Fi ac, Bluetooth 5.2, and a full suite of global navigation systems including GPS, Galileo, and GLONASS. The inclusion of a 3.5 mm headphone jack and FM radio adds to its everyday versatility, particularly for users who value traditional audio options. Security is handled by a side-mounted fingerprint sensor alongside facial recognition, both of which provide quick and convenient access. Additional software features include Xiaomi’s HyperOS 3, based on Android 16, which introduces AI-assisted tools such as Google Gemini integration and contextual search functions. While the software adds useful capabilities, it may also include preinstalled applications that not all users will find essential. Overall, the Xiaomi Redmi A7 Pro represents a pragmatic approach to the entry-level smartphone. It does not attempt to compete with higher-tier devices in performance, display resolution, or camera sophistication, but instead focuses on delivering the fundamentals reliably. Its large and smooth display, exceptional battery life, and straightforward user experience make it a practical choice for everyday use. For users seeking an affordable smartphone that prioritises endurance, simplicity, and essential functionality over advanced features, the Redmi A7 Pro stands out as a sensible and well-balanced option within its segment. Pros Cons Large 6.9" display with up to 120 Hz refresh rate (smoother scrolling than 60 Hz). HD+ resolution (1600 × 720, 254 ppi): limited sharpness for small text and fine details. Peak brightness up to 800 nits (HBM) plus a “sunlight mode” (improved outdoor readability for its segment). No HDR display support (so no HDR benefit even if the content supports it). Emphasis on visual comfort: DC dimming, triple TÜV Rheinland certification, and reading modes. 8-bit LCD panel / 83% NTSC: lower contrast and less deep blacks compared to OLED. Wet Touch 2.0: touch input designed to remain reliable with wet or greasy fingers. No Always-On Display (AOD) or certain “premium” display features. 6000 mAh battery with claims of strong endurance and longevity (1,000 cycles, ≥80% capacity retained). 15 W charging: around 132 minutes for a full charge (internal testing) and no wireless charging. UFS 2.2 storage with RAM expansion (up to 8 GB “virtual”): helps responsiveness at this price point. Physical RAM limited to 4 GB: heavy multitasking may struggle, and virtual RAM uses storage. IP52 rating (dust and splash resistance) according to the official FAQ. No dedicated cooling system: not ideal for extended intensive gaming or heavy workloads. Dual SIM + microSD (convenient for separating work and personal use without sacrificing storage expansion). “Virtual” proximity and ambient light sensors: potentially less accurate depending on usage (calls, auto-brightness). Bluetooth 5.2 + dual-band Wi-Fi 5; Bluetooth codecs (including LDAC). Wi-Fi: single antenna, no MU-MIMO, with a stated theoretical maximum of 433 Mbps. Widevine L1 (enables HD streaming on services like Netflix, which require it on Android). Casting/sharing: Miracast supported, but no Chromecast or DLNA according to the FAQ. “Functional” photography: 13 MP main camera with modes (document/night/HDR) + 8 MP selfie camera. Limited photo/video capabilities: no stabilisation, no slow motion, maximum 1080p/30 video, very basic secondary sensor. 3.5 mm headphone jack + claimed “200% volume boost”. Audio: single speaker (no stereo) and no Dolby Audio. AI features highlighted (Gemini, Circle to Search) via Google, and a claimed “48-month smooth experience” (internal testing). No NFC   ViserMark Labels for th e Xiaomi Redmi A7 Pro Please take a look at the following information about the battery performance of the Xiaomi Redmi A7 Pro : Battery Life: The Xiaomi Redmi A7 Pro delivers strong real-world endurance for an entry-level smartphone, reaching up to 49 hours of active use, which translates to roughly two days under balanced usage conditions. This places it slightly above the entry-tier average and clearly ahead of comparable budget devices such as the Redmi 14C. Despite its large 6.9-inch LCD display and modest hardware platform, the A7 Pro maintains stable runtime primarily through its high-capacity 6000 mAh battery. While it does not benefit from advanced efficiency optimisation or cutting-edge power management, overall endurance remains consistent across common tasks such as social media, browsing, and media playback. It does not reach the extended runtimes of more efficient devices with smaller displays or lighter workloads, but it provides dependable longevity without aggressive background restrictions. For users seeking reliable multi-day battery life at a low price point, the Redmi A7 Pro stands out as a practical and endurance-focused option. Battery Charging: Charging performance is functional but clearly positioned at the lower end of the segment. In testing, the Redmi A7 Pro requires approximately 2 hours and 10 minutes to charge from empty to full, reflecting its 15 W wired charging capability and a conservative charging profile. While this is noticeably slower than many mid-range alternatives, it remains adequate for overnight charging and routine daily use, particularly given the device’s large 6000 mAh battery capacity. Short charging sessions provide only moderate recovery, making quick top-ups less effective compared to faster-charging competitors. Wireless charging is not supported, reinforcing the phone’s entry-level positioning. Overall, the charging behaviour prioritises simplicity and battery longevity over speed, delivering a steady but unremarkable experience that aligns with expectations in this price category. Battery Performance & Efficiency: The Xiaomi Redmi A7 Pro focuses on capacity-driven endurance rather than refined efficiency. Task-based testing shows mixed optimisation, with relatively stable performance in areas such as gaming and camera usage, but higher consumption in scenarios like calls, social media, and media playback. Annual energy consumption measures at around 4.0 kWh, slightly above the entry-tier average, reflecting a less efficient power profile overall. Its battery performance score of 36 confirms this positioning, placing it below the segment average despite its strong runtime. These results highlight a strategy centred on delivering long usage times through a large battery rather than optimised energy management. As a result, the Redmi A7 Pro offers dependable endurance but lacks the efficiency gains seen in better-optimised devices, making it best suited to users who prioritise longevity and consistency over power efficiency or fast charging performance. Specification Overview  - Released Date: March 2026 Body & Build: Dimensions: 171.56 × 79.47 × 8.15 mm Weight: 208 g Materials: Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back Design: Large, clean design with a simple camera module; practical and understated aesthetic focused on usability rather than premium materials Display: Size: 6.9-inch IPS LCD Resolution: 1600 × 720 pixels (~254 ppi) Refresh Rate: Up to 120Hz Brightness: 650 nits typical, up to 800 nits (HBM) HDR Support: Not supported Colour Depth: 8-bit Contrast Ratio: 1500:1 Colour Gamut: 83% NTSC Certifications: TÜV Rheinland Low Blue Light, Flicker-Free, Circadian Friendly Other Features: DC dimming, Sunlight mode, Wet Touch support Operating System: OS: Xiaomi HyperOS 3 (based on Android) AI Features: Google Gemini Circle to Search AI sky / image tools Chipset & Performance: Processor: Unisoc T7250 (12 nm) CPU: Octa-core (2× Cortex-A75 @ 1.8 GHz + 6× Cortex-A55 @ 1.6 GHz) GPU: Mali-G57 Cooling: No dedicated cooling system Memory & Storage: Configurations: 4GB + 64GB 4GB + 128GB Expandable Storage: Yes (microSD card) Storage Type: UFS 2.2 RAM Expansion: Up to 8GB (virtual) Connectivity & Features: Network: 2G / 3G / 4G LTE (no 5G) SIM: Dual SIM + microSD slot Wi-Fi: Wi-Fi 5 (2.4 GHz / 5 GHz) Bluetooth: 5.2 NFC: Not listed → likely not supported (region-dependent, must be verified) USB: USB Type-C 2.0 Biometrics: Side-mounted fingerprint sensor + AI face unlock Navigation: GPS, Galileo, GLONASS, BeiDou, QZSS, A-GPS Sensors: Accelerometer, compass, virtual proximity and ambient light sensors Audio: Speakers: Single speaker 3.5mm Jack: Yes Features: Up to 200% volume boost (software-based) Camera System: Rear Cameras (Dual system): 13MP main camera (f/2.2, 1/3.06" sensor) Auxiliary sensor (depth/macro) Modes: HDR, Night, Portrait, Document, Time-lapse, Film filters Rear Video: 1080p @ 30fps 720p @ 30fps Front Camera: 8MP selfie camera (f/2.0) Modes: HDR, Portrait, Night, Time-lapse Front Video: 1080p @ 30fps Battery & Charging: Capacity: 6000 mAh (typical) Charging: 15W wired charging Charger: Not included (market-dependent) Wireless Charging: Not supported Colours Available: Black, Blue and Green. Performance - HOW WE TEST ViserMark  offers a comprehensive range of battery performance test results based on different criteria and benchmarks for evaluating a smartphone's performance. Our tests are performed using the strictest protocol in a controlled environment to ensure repetition and consistency powered by SmartViser's test auto mation solution viSer . Translating technical specifications into consumer benefits with SmartViser VWS Analytics Studio  is a complementary product to the viSer Test Automation solution. It enhances the viSer user experience and is the fastest way to analyse and view smartphone test results. We have used the interactive dashboard to show you the recent test results and translated them into ViserMark Labels. Join our readers to receive the latest update to our smartphone battery performance scores and performance reviews as soon as we finish testing! Smartphone Battery Performance - FULL TEST RESULTS AND REVIEW ViserMark has put the Xiaomi Redmi A7 Pro through our testing protocol, based on real smartphone usage from 100% battery level down to power off. This includes daily activities, such as calls, web, video and music streaming, gaming, social networks, picture and video capture, and standby. All activities are executed in a defined order and timeline.   These test results, show how the Xiaomi Redmi A7 Pro performed and the scores achieved. 1. Battery Performance The Xiaomi Redmi A7 Pro achieved a battery performance score of 36/100, placing it below the entry-tier reference average (42.75) and slightly behind devices such as the Xiaomi Redmi 14C (38) and Motorola Moto G34 (43). This positions the Redmi A7 Pro as an endurance-focused device with a capacity-driven rather than efficiency-driven power profile. While it does not rank highly in raw efficiency metrics, it maintains relatively stable energy behaviour in selected workloads such as gaming and camera usage. However, higher consumption is observed in scenarios like voice calls, media playback, and social media, which impacts its overall score. The result reflects Xiaomi’s tuning strategy: prioritising battery size and consistent runtime over refined power optimisation. Rather than targeting top-tier efficiency benchmarks, the Redmi A7 Pro delivers predictable behaviour supported by its large battery, which remains effective for everyday use. Charging is handled through 15W wired charging, with a full recharge measured at approximately 2 hours and 10 minutes. This places the Redmi A7 Pro at the lower end of the segment for charging performance, especially compared to faster-charging mid-range alternatives. The charging curve appears steady and conservative throughout, suggesting a focus on battery longevity and thermal stability rather than speed. As with many recent devices, a charger may not be included in the box depending on the region. Wireless and reverse charging are not supported, and quick top-ups provide limited recovery in short sessions. Nevertheless, the overall charging experience remains functional for overnight use and aligns with the device’s entry-level positioning and large 6000 mAh battery capacity. Overall, the Xiaomi Redmi A7 Pro demonstrates a capacity-led energy profile. SmartViser workload testing indicates mixed efficiency across usage scenarios, with acceptable performance in gaming and camera tasks but less optimisation in communication and media-related activities. Annual energy consumption sits at around 4.0 kWh, slightly above the entry-tier average, confirming a higher overall power draw. For users, this translates to reliable two-day endurance despite below-average efficiency metrics. The Redmi A7 Pro is not designed as an optimised or performance-balanced device, but rather as a practical solution that delivers consistent battery life through sheer capacity. Within its category, it offers dependable longevity, even if it does not achieve the efficiency or refinement seen in better-balanced competitors. 2. Battery Life In ViserMark’s battery life testing, the Xiaomi Redmi A7 Pro delivered up to 49 hours of active usage, corresponding to approximately 2 days of typical real-world use. This places it slightly above the entry-tier reference average (46.15 hours / 1.8 days) and clearly ahead of the Xiaomi Redmi 14C, which reached 39 hours (1.5 days). While it does not match the longest runtimes observed in the category, such as the Motorola Moto G34 at 53 hours (2 days), the Redmi A7 Pro remains positioned within the upper range of entry-level devices focused on endurance. This level of battery life is achieved primarily through the device’s large 6000 mAh battery, rather than advanced efficiency optimisation. Despite operating a large 6.9-inch LCD display and modest hardware platform, the Redmi A7 Pro maintains stable runtime across everyday workloads. The results indicate a straightforward power management approach, where capacity compensates for less refined efficiency, allowing sustained usage without the need for aggressive background restrictions or performance limitations. When compared directly with competing devices, the Redmi A7 Pro demonstrates a clear improvement over the Redmi 14C. However, it falls short of the Motorola Moto G34, which achieves longer runtime through more efficient power management. This highlights a different optimisation strategy, with Xiaomi prioritising battery size and consistency, while competitors focus more heavily on efficiency gains. For everyday users, the Redmi A7 Pro ’s two-day battery life provides dependable coverage for typical usage patterns including messaging, streaming, browsing, and navigation. Even moderately heavy users can comfortably complete a full day with significant battery reserve remaining. Overall, the Redmi A7 Pro positions itself as an endurance-focused entry-level device, delivering consistent and reliable battery life that aligns with its large display and practical hardware profile within its segment. 3.   Battery Consumption The Xiaomi Redmi A7 Pro and Motorola Moto G34 were analysed for battery consumption across a wide range of everyday tasks using SmartViser's viSer and VWS Analytics Studio . The comparison highlighted differences in power usage for activities such as social media, calls, gaming, camera, and web browsing. During social media usage, the Redmi A7 Pro shows higher power draw than the Moto G34, indicating lower efficiency during continuous scrolling and sustained screen-on activity. This suggests less refined display power management and background process optimisation. In outgoing voice calls, the Redmi A7 Pro again consumes significantly more power, pointing to less efficient modem and system-level communication handling compared to its competitor. In gaming, the trend shifts. The Redmi A7 Pro demonstrates lower power consumption  than the Moto G34, indicating relatively better efficiency under sustained graphical load. This suggests that, despite its entry-level hardware, the device maintains stable performance with reasonable optimisation in GPU-intensive scenarios. For download and upload tasks, the Redmi A7 Pro continues to show a slight advantage, drawing less power than the Moto G34. This may indicate more conservative performance scaling or lower throughput demands during data transfer, favouring efficiency over peak speed. Camera usage is broadly comparable between the two devices, with only a small difference in power consumption. The Redmi A7 Pro performs marginally better, suggesting adequate optimisation in imaging workloads, although the gap is not significant enough to represent a clear advantage. In media-related tasks, results are mixed and more balanced between the two devices. During YouTube streaming, the Redmi A7 Pro shows slightly lower power consumption than the Moto G34, indicating marginally better efficiency in this scenario. However, the trend reverses in video replay, where the Redmi A7 Pro draws noticeably more power, making it less efficient during local playback. In media player usage, the Redmi A7 Pro also maintains a small advantage, consuming less power overall. Web browsing follows a similar pattern, with the Redmi A7 Pro again demonstrating slightly lower consumption, suggesting more efficient behaviour in general browsing scenarios. When comparing the Xiaomi Redmi A7 Pro with the Xiaomi Redmi 14C across SmartViser’s battery consumption tests, clear differences emerge in how each device manages power under everyday workloads. Although both belong to the same entry-level segment, their behaviour reflects slightly different optimisation priorities. During social media usage, the Redmi A7 Pro draws marginally more power than the Redmi 14C, indicating slightly lower efficiency in sustained scrolling and screen-on activity. In outgoing voice calls, however, the Redmi A7 Pro shows a clear advantage, consuming significantly less power, which suggests improved modem efficiency and better optimisation for communication tasks. In gaming, the Redmi A7 Pro demonstrates a notable efficiency gain. It consumes substantially less power than the Redmi 14C, indicating better control under sustained graphical workloads. This points to more effective handling of GPU-related tasks despite similar entry-level hardware positioning. For download and upload tasks, the Redmi A7 Pro again shows a clear advantage, drawing significantly less power than the Redmi 14C. This suggests a more efficient approach to network activity, potentially through better bandwidth management or lower sustained performance states during data transfer. Camera usage is another area where the Redmi A7 Pro performs slightly better, consuming less power than the Redmi 14C during extended imaging scenarios. While the difference is not dramatic, it indicates modest optimisation improvements in camera-related workloads. In media-related tasks, the Redmi A7 Pro consistently demonstrates stronger efficiency. During YouTube streaming, replay, and media player usage, it draws noticeably less power than the Redmi 14C, indicating better optimisation for video playback and multimedia consumption. Web browsing follows the same pattern, with the Redmi A7 Pro maintaining a clear efficiency advantage in typical browsing scenarios. When comparing the battery behaviour of the Xiaomi Redmi A7 Pro , Motorola Moto G34, Xiaomi Redmi 14C, and the entry-tier reference using SmartViser’s viSer testing, it becomes clear that each device follows a distinct power management strategy, with noticeable impact on real-world efficiency and endurance. The Motorola Moto G34 performs best in social media, outgoing calls, and replay, where it records the lowest current draw among the compared devices in those scenarios. This suggests stronger optimisation in communication-heavy and certain playback-related tasks. In particular, its advantage in voice calls is substantial, making it the most efficient option here for sustained communication use. The Xiaomi Redmi A7 Pro performs better in gaming, download/upload, camera use, YouTube, media player, and web browsing. Its advantage is especially clear in gaming and data transfer, where it draws noticeably less power than both the Moto G34 and Redmi 14C. This indicates that Xiaomi has tuned the device more effectively for certain sustained and multimedia-related workloads, even if that optimisation does not extend evenly across all use cases. The Xiaomi Redmi 14C is the weakest overall performer in this comparison. It records the highest power draw in most categories, including outgoing calls, gaming, download/upload, YouTube, replay, media player, and web browsing. This points to a generally less efficient power profile across everyday tasks. Compared with the entry-tier average, the Redmi A7 Pro sits above average in gaming, data transfer, YouTube, media player, and web browsing, but below average in social media, outgoing calls, camera usage, and replay. This makes it a mixed but still competitive device in efficiency terms, with clear strengths in some workloads and visible weaknesses in others. Overall, the Xiaomi Redmi A7 Pro does not show universal efficiency leadership, but neither is it broadly inefficient. Instead, it delivers a selective optimisation profile: stronger in gaming, browsing, and several media-related tasks, but weaker in social media, calling, and replay. The Moto G34 remains more efficient in a smaller number of categories, but those include some of the most common day-to-day smartphone activities. 4.   Battery Efficiency In ViserMark’s battery efficiency evaluation, the Xiaomi Redmi A7 Pro received a 0.5-leaf rating, placing it well below the entry-tier reference level (1.2) and behind both the Xiaomi Redmi 14C (1.0) and Motorola Moto G34 (1.5). Within this comparison group, the Moto G34 demonstrates the strongest efficiency performance, while the Redmi A7 Pro sits at the lowest end of the scale. These results indicate that the device is not optimised for energy efficiency, but instead relies on battery capacity to sustain its overall performance. This efficiency score reflects the Redmi A7 Pro ’s behaviour under real-world workloads. While it maintains acceptable power usage in certain scenarios such as gaming and camera operation, it draws noticeably more energy in common everyday tasks including social media, media playback, and voice communication. The device avoids aggressive background restrictions and delivers stable, predictable performance, but this consistency comes at the cost of higher baseline power consumption compared to more efficiently tuned competitors. The low leaf rating suggests that the Redmi A7 Pro follows a capacity-driven power strategy, prioritising long runtime through its 6000 mAh battery rather than refined energy optimisation. Unlike devices such as the Moto G34, which achieve stronger efficiency through tighter system tuning, the Redmi A7 Pro focuses on delivering reliable endurance with minimal performance constraints. This approach results in dependable multi-day usage, but with a less efficient overall energy profile within the entry-level segment. 5.   Annual Energy Consumption According to ViserMark’s annual energy consumption testing, the Xiaomi Redmi A7 Pro records an estimated usage of around 4.0 kWh per year, placing it above the entry-tier reference average (3.4 kWh) but below the Xiaomi Redmi 14C (4.3 kWh). This result reflects the Redmi A7 Pro’s positioning as an endurance-focused device rather than an efficiency-optimised model, with long-term energy use influenced by its large 6.9-inch display and relatively high baseline power consumption. The Xiaomi Redmi 14C shows the highest annual energy consumption in this comparison group, indicating a consistently higher power draw across multiple usage scenarios. By contrast, the Motorola Moto G34 achieves the lowest consumption at 3.1 kWh, reflecting more efficient power management and lower energy demand during everyday tasks such as browsing, media playback, and communication. The Redmi A7 Pro sits between these two approaches. While it improves on the 14C in overall energy use, it remains noticeably less efficient than the Moto G34 and above the segment average. This suggests that, although some optimisation is present, the device still relies heavily on battery capacity rather than refined power management to deliver its runtime performance. Overall, the Xiaomi Redmi A7 Pro demonstrates a capacity-driven energy profile. It does not achieve the low long-term consumption levels of more efficient competitors, but it maintains acceptable annual usage while supporting extended battery life. This balance allows the device to deliver reliable endurance for everyday use, albeit with a higher energy footprint than the most efficient options in the entry-level segment. Who Should Buy the Xiaomi Redmi A7 Pro? The Xiaomi Redmi A7 Pro is best suited for users who want long battery life, a large display, and reliable everyday functionality, and who are comfortable with a power profile that prioritises capacity over efficiency optimisation in certain tasks. This phone is ideal for people who prioritise endurance and screen size above all else. The large 6.9-inch display offers a comfortable viewing experience for apps, messaging, and video, while the 6000 mAh battery ensures the device can last up to two days in typical use. If your priority is a phone that simply keeps going without frequent charging, the Redmi A7 Pro delivers strongly in this area. It is also a good fit for users who engage in mixed everyday usage, particularly tasks such as gaming, web browsing, media playback, and data-related activities. The Redmi A7 Pro performs efficiently in gaming, download/upload, YouTube, media player, and browsing scenarios, often outperforming devices like the Motorola Moto G34 and clearly improving over the Redmi 14C. This makes it well suited to users who want stable performance in these common use cases without excessive battery drain. The Redmi A7 Pro also suits users who prefer a simple, consistent experience without aggressive power-saving behaviour. It does not rely heavily on restrictive background management, meaning apps remain active, multitasking is predictable, and overall system behaviour feels stable. Combined with its entry-level hardware, this creates a straightforward and dependable daily-use device. Where the Redmi A7 Pro is not the best match is for users whose daily usage is dominated by social media scrolling, long voice calls, and video replay, and who want maximum efficiency in those specific scenarios. Iin these tasks, the device consumes more power than competitors like the Moto G34 and often exceeds the entry-tier average. Battery life remains strong overall, but this is achieved through battery size rather than optimised efficiency in these areas. It is also not aimed at users seeking high-end performance, advanced photography, or premium display quality. The HD+ LCD panel, basic camera system, and entry-level chipset reflect its budget positioning. Likewise, users looking for fast charging, 5G connectivity, or premium features such as stereo speakers or OLED displays will need to look at higher-tier devices. ViserMark VERDICT The Xiaomi Redmi A7 Pro - what's it like to use? Using the Xiaomi Redmi A7 Pro feels like carrying a large, straightforward, endurance-focused phone that prioritises battery life, screen size, and reliability over performance or premium features. Day-to-day tasks such as messaging, navigation, light multitasking, and general app use feel smooth enough and dependable within the limits of its entry-level hardware. HyperOS runs in a stable manner, and while app switching is not particularly fast, it remains predictable. The phone does not feel overly aggressive in closing background apps, which helps maintain a consistent “ready to use” experience, even if performance is modest. The 6.9-inch LCD display is one of the most noticeable aspects of the experience. It is large and comfortable for everyday use, making reading, browsing, and watching videos easy on the eyes. The 120 Hz refresh rate adds a sense of fluidity when scrolling, even if the HD+ resolution limits sharpness compared to higher-end devices. Brightness is adequate outdoors, and while colours and contrast are not as rich as OLED panels, the overall viewing experience is perfectly serviceable for this price segment. Where usage becomes more distinctive is in power behaviour. The Redmi A7 Pro performs efficiently in areas such as gaming, browsing, media playback, and data-related tasks. However, it draws more power during social media use, voice calls, and video replay compared to more efficient devices like the Motorola Moto G34. In practice, this means the phone still lasts a long time overall, but it does not optimise equally across all scenarios. Instead, it relies on its large battery to maintain strong endurance. In contrast, the Redmi A7 Pro feels well suited to steady, everyday usage patterns. Activities like watching videos, browsing the web, or casual gaming do not cause noticeable instability or rapid battery drain. The device maintains consistent behaviour without sudden slowdowns, which reinforces its identity as a practical, reliability-focused smartphone rather than a performance-driven one. Performance under heavier use is understandably limited. Multitasking with many apps, switching quickly between demanding applications, or running more complex games can expose the constraints of the chipset and 4 GB of RAM. That said, for typical daily use, the phone remains usable and predictable rather than frustrating. Gaming performance is adequate for casual titles and lighter games, with stable behaviour rather than high frame rates. Thermal management is simple but sufficient for this level of hardware. Charging, on the other hand, is slow by modern standards. It is best suited to overnight charging, as quick top-ups provide only limited recovery due to the 15W charging speed. The Xiaomi Redmi A7 Pro feels like a no-nonsense, battery-first smartphone. It does not try to impress with speed or premium features, but instead delivers a consistent, easy-to-use experience with strong endurance and a large, comfortable display. For users with simple needs and a focus on reliability, it works well. For those expecting performance, sharp visuals, or fast charging, its limitations are quickly noticeable. VCX (Valued Camera eXperience) The VCX Forum  has been working with its members on the system and infrastructure as a non-profit organisation. We strive to improve our technology to develop and exchange accurate and objective quality and performance indicators, which is our ultimate goal. We will also serve as a compass for the smartphone camera industry. We appreciate your interest in the VCX Forum. VCX Forum: No review Background Xiaomi  was founded in 2010 by serial entrepreneur Lei Jun, with a vision to deliver high-quality technology at accessible prices. Committed to a user-centric approach, Xiaomi quickly gained traction in the mobile internet space. By 2014, the company had sold over 61 million smartphones and expanded into key markets including Taiwan, Hong Kong, Singapore, Malaysia, the Philippines, India, Indonesia, and Brazil. Headquartered in Beijing, China, Xiaomi continues its global expansion with offices across the Asia-Pacific region, India, and Brazil, positioning itself as a rising global tech brand. Written by Marcella Frattari   is the Communication Marketing and Lead Generation Manager at SmartViser, playing a key role in shaping the company's communication and marketing strategies. With a background in journalism and a passion for digital communication, Marcella focuses on improving SmartViser's overall online presence and engagement. Her dedication to clear, effective communication and creative content makes her a valuable asset to the team. Press Contact Marcella Frattari: Contact@visermark.com Our Resources ViserMark Scores ViserMark Reviews Success Stories Latest Articles Discover what ViserMark is all about. Read ViserMark's latest in-depth smartphone battery reviews. Discover our main success stories with Telecoms and other industries. Read more articles on our battery life, performance reviews, and test results. Know more Know more Know more Know more

SMARTPHONE TIER: FLAGSHIP/PRO TIER Battery Capacity mAh: 4300 Samsung Galaxy S26: Optimisation Over Battery Size SMARTPHONE BATTERY PERFORMANCE Based on Price: Flagship/Pro Tier (€700+)  Flagship/Pro  Tier Ranking # 4 Learn more: Quick Summary ViserMark Labels Specifications Know the Test Results ViserMark Verdict Video Review - Soon Available The Samsung Galaxy S26 is a refined continuation of Samsung’s flagship philosophy, delivering a polished and well-balanced smartphone experience rather than chasing dramatic reinvention. It may not push boundaries in design or hardware, but it focuses on consistency, efficiency, and long-term usability, making it a compelling choice for users who value reliability over spectacle. At its core sits the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Qualcomm’s latest 3nm powerhouse, built around a high-performance Oryon V3 architecture. With two prime Phoenix L cores clocked up to 4.74GHz and six Phoenix M cores handling sustained workloads, the S26 delivers excellent responsiveness across all scenarios. Paired with the Adreno 840 GPU, 12GB of RAM, and up to 512GB of UFS 4.X storage, it handles demanding multitasking and high-end gaming with ease. Thermal management is solid for a device of this size, and while extended workloads can introduce mild throttling, everyday performance remains consistently smooth and reliable. The 6.3-inch Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X display continues to be one of the device’s standout features. With a resolution of 1080x2340, a 120Hz adaptive refresh rate, and HDR10+ support, it delivers a fluid and vibrant viewing experience. Peak brightness reaches up to 2600 nits, ensuring excellent outdoor visibility, while deep blacks and rich colour reproduction maintain Samsung’s reputation for display quality. Protected by Gorilla Glass Victus 2, the panel strikes a balance between durability and visual performance. Design-wise, the Galaxy S26 embraces subtle refinement over bold experimentation. At just 7.2mm thick and weighing 167g, it feels compact, lightweight, and comfortable in hand, increasingly rare qualities in the flagship space. The combination of glass panels and an Armour Aluminium frame gives it a premium, understated feel, while IP68 certification ensures durability against water and dust. Available in a range of finishes including Cobalt Violet, Sky Blue, and Silver Shadow, it maintains a clean, modern aesthetic without overstatement. Photography remains consistent rather than groundbreaking. The triple camera system is led by a 50MP main sensor, supported by a 10MP telephoto lens with 3x optical zoom and a 12MP ultrawide. Image quality is dependable, with accurate colours, good dynamic range, and solid performance across varied lighting conditions. However, the lack of hardware upgrades compared to the previous generation may feel underwhelming for users expecting a significant leap. Video capabilities remain strong, with support for 8K recording and advanced stabilisation features such as Horizon Lock, while the 12MP front camera delivers sharp 4K video and reliable selfies. Battery performance is where the Galaxy S26 quietly distinguishes itself. Despite a modest 4300mAh capacity, improvements in efficiency result in noticeably better real-world endurance. Power consumption is reduced compared to previous models, allowing the device to comfortably reach around two days of moderate use, or a full day under heavier workloads. This efficiency-first approach makes the S26 more consistent across a range of activities, from streaming and gaming to everyday browsing. However, charging speeds remain unchanged at 25W wired and 15W wireless, which feels conservative compared to many competitors offering significantly faster solutions. The Galaxy S26 runs Android 16 with One UI 8.5, bringing a mature and feature-rich software experience. Samsung’s commitment to seven years of updates continues to be a major advantage, ensuring longevity and security well beyond most competitors. Features such as Samsung DeX, advanced AI tools, and seamless ecosystem integration enhance productivity and everyday usability. With Wi-Fi 7, Bluetooth 5.4, stereo speakers, and an ultrasonic in-display fingerprint sensor, the Galaxy S26 covers all the essentials expected from a modern flagship. It may not be the most daring device in its category, but it excels in delivering a dependable, efficient, and well-rounded experience. Pros Cons The Galaxy S26 offers one of the most refined compact flagship designs, combining a 6.3-inch display with a lightweight, premium build that remains comfortable for daily use, something increasingly rare in modern smartphones. The overall upgrade is incremental, with limited hardware changes over the previous generation, making it less compelling for recent Galaxy users. The Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X display delivers excellent brightness, colour accuracy, and efficiency, with adaptive refresh rates helping to optimise battery life in real-world usage. The Full HD+ resolution, while sharp, is lower than the QHD+ panels found on some competing flagship devices at a similar price point. Powered by the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, the S26 provides top-tier performance and strong AI capabilities, handling gaming, multitasking, and demanding apps with ease. Sustained workloads can still lead to thermal constraints, a common limitation in compact flagship designs under heavy load. Battery efficiency is a key improvement. Despite a 4300mAh capacity, optimisation enables 48h usage and improved endurance compared to previous models, even without increasing battery size. Battery capacity remains relatively modest, and Samsung has not adopted newer high-density battery technologies, unlike some competitors. Samsung’s commitment to seven years of software updates significantly enhances long-term value and device longevity. Charging speeds remain conservative, with 25W wired charging still lagging behind rivals offering much faster solutions. The triple camera system delivers reliable, well-balanced results, with strong low-light performance and consistent image processing. Camera hardware is largely unchanged, meaning the S26 lacks the innovation seen in competing devices pushing zoom and sensor advancements. AI integration and software optimisation create a smooth, intelligent user experience, with features improving productivity, photography, and system efficiency. The focus on AI may feel more like software-driven upgrades rather than meaningful hardware innovation. Strong connectivity and ecosystem features, including Wi-Fi 7, DeX, and seamless integration, make it a well-rounded productivity device. Pricing has increased slightly, placing it in direct competition with devices offering more aggressive hardware upgrades for the same cost.   ViserMark Labels for the Samsung Galaxy S26 Please take a look at the following information about the battery performance of the Samsung Galaxy S26 : Battery Life: The Samsung Galaxy S26 delivers up to 48 hours of active use in testing, translating to roughly 1.5 to 2 days of moderate daily usage. While the 4300mAh battery may appear modest on paper, improved efficiency allows the device to outperform its predecessor and other comparable flagships in real-world scenarios. Users can expect reliable all-day endurance even with mixed usage, though intensive tasks such as prolonged gaming, camera use, or sustained high brightness will still reduce longevity and may require a recharge before the end of the day. Battery Charging: The Galaxy S26 supports 25W wired charging and 15W wireless charging (Qi2 Ready), with Samsung claiming around 55% charge in 30 minutes. In practice, a full charge takes approximately 1 hour and 19 minutes using a compatible USB PD 3.0 charger, aligning closely with official expectations. Wireless charging remains noticeably slower and is influenced by thermal conditions and charging accessories. While these speeds are adequate for most users, they fall behind competitors that now offer significantly faster charging technologies, making this one of the device’s less competitive areas. Battery Performance & Efficiency: Efficiency is where the Galaxy S26 makes its most meaningful progress. Annual energy consumption drops to approximately 2.9 kWh, a notable improvement over previous models. With a battery performance score of 47, the S26 stands out as a highly efficient flagship, prioritising consistency and sustained performance over raw battery capacity. Specification Overview  - Released Date: March 2026 Body & Build: Dimensions: 149.6 x 71.7 x 7.2 mm Weight: 167g Materials: Armour Aluminium frame, Gorilla Glass Victus 2 front and back Durability: IP68 certified, water and dust resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 minutes) Design: Compact, lightweight, and premium with a clean, refined aesthetic Display: Size: 6.3-inch Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X Resolution: 2340 x 1080 (FHD+), ~411 ppi Refresh Rate: 120Hz adaptive Brightness: Up to 2600 nits peak (advertised), ~1380 nits (measured) HDR Support: HDR10+ Protection: Gorilla Glass Victus 2 Operating System: OS: Android 16 with One UI 8.5 Support: Up to 7 years of OS and security updates Chipset & Performance: Processor: Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (3nm) / Exynos 2600 (region dependent) CPU: Up to 2x 4.74 GHz + 6x 3.62 GHz (Oryon V3 architecture) GPU: Adreno 840 / Xclipse 960 (region dependent) Memory & Storage: Configurations: 256GB + 12GB RAM 512GB + 12GB RAM Expandable Storage: Not supported (no microSD) Tech: UFS 4.X Connectivity & Features: 5G: Yes (Sub6 + mmWave depending on region) SIM: Dual SIM (Nano + eSIM, max 2 active lines) Wi-Fi: Wi-Fi 7 Bluetooth: 5.4 NFC / USB-C: Yes / USB-C 3.2 (DisplayPort 1.2, OTG) Biometrics: Ultrasonic in-display fingerprint reader Samsung DeX: Supported (wired and wireless) Audio: Stereo speakers Camera System: Rear Cameras: 50MP main (f/1.8, OIS, dual pixel PDAF) 10MP telephoto (f/2.4, 3x optical zoom, OIS) 12MP ultrawide (f/2.2, 120°, Super Steady video) Front Camera: 12MP (f/2.2, Dual Pixel PDAF) Video: Up to 8K (rear), 4K60 (front), HDR10+, 10-bit video Colours Available: Cobalt Violet, Sky Blue, Black, White, Silver Shadow, Pink Gold Performance - HOW WE TEST ViserMark  offers a comprehensive range of battery performance test results based on different criteria and benchmarks for evaluating a smartphone's performance. Our tests are performed using the strictest protocol in a controlled environment to ensure repetition and consistency powered by SmartViser's test auto mation solution viSer . Translating technical specifications into consumer benefits with SmartViser VWS Analytics Studio  is a complementary product to the viSer Test Automation solution. It enhances the viSer user experience and is the fastest way to analyse and view smartphone test results. We have used the interactive dashboard to show you the recent test results and translated them into ViserMark Labels. Join our readers to receive the latest update to our smartphone battery performance scores and performance reviews as soon as we finish testing! Smartphone Battery Performance - FULL TEST RESULTS AND REVIEW ViserMark has put the Samsung Galaxy S26 through our testing protocol, based on real smartphone usage from 100% battery level down to power off. This includes daily activities, such as calls, web, video and music streaming, gaming, social networks, picture and video capture, and standby. All activities are executed in a defined order and timeline.   These test results, show how the Samsung Galaxy S26 performed and the scores achieved. 1. Battery Performance The Samsung Galaxy S26 achieved a battery performance score of 47/100 in ViserMark testing, placing it clearly ahead of the Galaxy S25 and S25 Edge (both at 41/100) as well as the Flagship/Pro Tier average (~41.9/100). This improvement reflects Samsung’s focus on efficiency rather than simply increasing battery capacity, allowing the S26 to deliver more consistent endurance across a range of real-world usage scenarios. Charging is handled via 25W wired power delivery, with Samsung advertising a 55% top-up in 30 minutes. In our real-world testing, the device reached a full charge in 1 hour and 19 minutes using a certified USB PD charger. Wireless charging is supported at 15W (Qi2 Ready), alongside reverse wireless charging at 4.5W. While functional, charging speeds remain conservative compared to competitors offering significantly faster solutions. Overall, the Galaxy S26 positions itself as an efficiency-driven flagship rather than a battery brute. It delivers dependable, well-optimised performance that comfortably supports all-day usage and beyond, without the need for excessive battery capacity. Users prioritising consistency and optimisation will appreciate this approach, while those seeking ultra-fast charging or maximum endurance may still find stronger alternatives elsewhere. 2. Battery Life In ViserMark’s battery life testing, the Samsung Galaxy S26 achieved 48 hours of continuous usage, translating to around 1.5 days of real-world battery life under typical conditions. This marks a clear improvement over the Galaxy S25 (35 hours) and S25 Edge (34 hours), despite the S26 maintaining a relatively compact form factor and a modest 4300mAh battery. Thanks to the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 chipset and Samsung’s One UI 8.5 optimisations, the S26 demonstrates excellent efficiency across a range of workloads. While it slightly trails the Flagship/Pro Tier average (~40.7 hours) in peak endurance scenarios, it delivers more consistent performance across mixed usage, particularly in everyday tasks such as browsing, streaming, and social media. Overall, the Galaxy S26 provides dependable day-to-day stamina with a strong emphasis on efficiency rather than raw battery size. It comfortably supports full-day use and beyond for most users, making it a well-balanced choice for those seeking reliability without compromising on performance or portability. 3.   Battery Consumption The Samsung Galaxy S26 and Samsung Galaxy S25 were analysed for battery consumption across various daily tasks using SmartViser's viSer and VWS Analytics Studio . The comparison highlighted differences in power usage for activities such as social media, calls, gaming, camera, and web browsing. As the direct successor to the Galaxy S25 , the Galaxy S26 demonstrates significantly lower power consumption in several key areas. The most notable gains appear in social media, outgoing calls, and download/upload tasks, where the S26 draws considerably less power than the S25. This indicates improved optimisation in connectivity, data handling, and background processing. The advantage continues in media playback scenarios, where the S26 maintains lower consumption, further reinforcing its efficiency gains in sustained but optimised workloads. However, the picture is more nuanced in other scenarios. In gaming, the S26 consumes slightly more power than the S25 , suggesting that higher performance levels come with a small efficiency trade-off under sustained GPU load. This trend becomes more pronounced in the Replay workload, where the S26 draws noticeably more power, indicating that background-heavy or repeated processing tasks are less efficiently handled compared to the S25. A similar pattern appears in YouTube streaming, where the S26 also consumes more power than the S25 . This suggests that video streaming workloads are not as optimised as other use cases, potentially due to higher processing demands or differences in display and decoding behaviour. Camera usage shows relatively similar results between both devices, with only marginal differences in consumption. Web browsing is also closely matched, though the S26 retains a slight efficiency edge overall. In conclusion, the Galaxy S26 represents a meaningful step forward in overall energy efficiency, delivering lower power consumption across most everyday tasks, particularly those involving connectivity and data transfer, while still showing some trade-offs in more demanding or sustained workloads such as gaming, replay, and video streaming. The Samsung Galaxy S26 and Galaxy S25 Edge show clear differences in power consumption across key usage scenarios, reflecting two distinct optimisation strategies despite sharing the same flagship tier positioning. The Galaxy S26 demonstrates significantly lower power consumption in several core tasks. The most substantial gains appear in social media, outgoing calls, and download/upload activities. These are major efficiency improvements, indicating better optimisation in connectivity, modem usage, and sustained data handling. Web browsing and media playback also favour the S26, further reinforcing its advantage in everyday usage scenarios. However, the S26 does not outperform the S25 Edge across all workloads. In gaming, the S26 consumes more power, suggesting a higher performance output but with a corresponding efficiency trade-off. This pattern continues in YouTube streaming, where the S26 shows notably higher consumption, likely due to differences in display behaviour or video processing. The Replay workload further highlights this trade-off, with the S26 drawing slightly less power, indicating better handling of certain background or repeated processing tasks compared to the Edge. Camera usage remains broadly similar between both devices, with only marginal differences that are unlikely to impact real-world usage significantly. In conclusion, the Galaxy S26 delivers a more efficient and balanced power profile overall, particularly in connectivity-driven and everyday tasks. However, these gains come with trade-offs in performance-heavy and video-related workloads, where the S25 Edge can be more efficient. This positions the S26 as the more optimised all-rounder, while the Edge retains advantages in specific high-intensity scenarios. The battery performance comparison between the Samsung Galaxy S26 , Galaxy S25 , S25 Edge , and the Flagship/Pro Tier average reveals clear differences in energy consumption across everyday activities, offering a comprehensive view of how each device manages power under real-world conditions. The Galaxy S26 emerges as the most efficient device in connectivity-driven scenarios. It significantly outperforms both the S25 and S25 Edge in social media, outgoing calls, and download/upload tasks. It also slightly outperforms the Flagship/Pro Tier average in these areas, highlighting strong optimisation in modem efficiency and background data handling. The S26 also performs well in media playback, where it is more efficient than both the S25 and S25 Edge , as well as the category average. Web browsing results are closely aligned with the average, indicating balanced efficiency in lighter workloads. However, the S26 does not lead across all scenarios. In gaming, it consumes more power than both the S25 and S25 Edge , and also exceeds the Flagship/Pro Tier average, suggesting a higher performance output with a corresponding efficiency cost. A similar pattern appears in YouTube streaming, where the S26 is significantly less efficient than both competitors and the average. The Replay workload further reinforces this trend, with the S26 drawing considerably more power than the S25 and the category average, though slightly outperforming the S25 Edge. Camera usage presents a more balanced picture. While the S26 is slightly less efficient than the S25 , it remains more efficient than both the S25 Edge and significantly better than the Flagship/Pro Tier average, indicating strong optimisation in imaging workloads. In conclusion, the Galaxy S26 delivers the most well-rounded and efficient power profile overall, particularly in everyday and connectivity-heavy scenarios. However, these gains come with clear trade-offs in video streaming, replay, and gaming workloads. This highlights a strategic shift towards real-world efficiency, rather than peak optimisation across all use cases. 4.   Battery Efficiency In ViserMark’s battery efficiency testing, the Samsung Galaxy S26 achieved a 1.5-leaf rating, placing it clearly ahead of both the Galaxy S25 and S25 Edge (1 leaf each), as well as the Flagship/Pro Tier average (1.0). This result highlights a meaningful leap in energy efficiency within Samsung’s flagship lineup. Despite maintaining a relatively compact design and a modest 4300mAh battery, the S26 benefits from improved optimisation across both hardware and software. The combination of the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 chipset and One UI 8.5 enables more efficient power management, particularly in connectivity-driven and everyday usage scenarios. Unlike its predecessor, the S26 demonstrates more consistent efficiency across a wider range of workloads, including social media, calls, and data-intensive tasks. These gains suggest enhanced modem efficiency, better background process control, and more refined system-level optimisation. The 1.5-leaf rating confirms that the Galaxy S26 not only meets flagship efficiency standards but surpasses them, positioning it among the most energy-efficient devices in its category. For users prioritising longevity, consistency, and optimisation over raw battery capacity, the S26 represents a significant step forward in Samsung’s approach to power efficiency. 5.   Annual Energy Consumption According to ViserMark, the Samsung Galaxy S26 has an estimated annual energy consumption of 2.9 kWh, representing a significant improvement over both the Galaxy S25 and S25 Edge (3.7 kWh), as well as the Flagship/Pro Tier average (3.7 kWh). This positions the S26 among the most energy-efficient devices in the premium segment. This reduction in energy consumption highlights Samsung’s shift towards optimisation-driven efficiency. Despite delivering flagship-level performance and maintaining a high-end display and feature set, the S26 manages to draw considerably less power over time, resulting in lower long-term energy usage. Compared to its predecessor, the improvement is substantial, reflecting better integration between the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 chipset and One UI 8.5. Gains in connectivity, background processing, and overall system efficiency contribute to this lower consumption profile across a wide range of daily tasks. In practical terms, the Galaxy S26 offers meaningful energy savings without compromising performance. It demonstrates that high-end smartphones can deliver both power and efficiency, making it an excellent choice for users seeking a premium experience with reduced long-term energy impact. Who Should Buy the Samsung Galaxy S26? The Galaxy S26 is ideal for users who prioritise a well-balanced flagship experience, combining strong performance, compact design, and excellent energy efficiency. Its lightweight form factor, premium build, and vibrant AMOLED display make it particularly appealing to those who want a high-end smartphone that remains comfortable for everyday use. Battery efficiency is one of its standout strengths. Despite its relatively modest 4300mAh capacity, the S26 delivers excellent real-world endurance, outperforming its predecessor and the flagship category average in overall battery life and annual energy consumption. It excels in connectivity-driven tasks such as social media, calls, and data usage, making it especially suitable for users with active, on-the-go usage patterns. The device is also well suited for users who value longevity and software support. With seven years of updates, alongside features like Samsung DeX and a mature One UI experience, the S26 offers strong long-term usability and ecosystem integration. Professionals, frequent travellers, and everyday users alike will benefit from its consistent performance and reliability. However, it may be less ideal for users who prioritise peak performance in sustained workloads such as intensive gaming or prolonged video streaming, where power consumption is higher compared to some competitors. Similarly, those seeking cutting-edge camera innovation or ultra-fast charging may find better options elsewhere. Ultimately, the Galaxy S26 is best suited for users who want a refined, efficient, and dependable flagship, one that delivers a premium experience without excess bulk or unnecessary complexity. ViserMark VERDICT The Samsung Galaxy   S26 - what's it like to use? Using the Galaxy S26 feels like a refined, well-balanced flagship that prioritises consistency over flashiness. The Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 and 12GB of RAM deliver fast, fluid performance across multitasking, gaming, and everyday apps, with a level of stability that makes the experience feel polished and reliable. One UI 8.5 runs smoothly, with AI features subtly enhancing productivity and usability without overwhelming the core experience. The 6.3-inch AMOLED display is sharp, responsive, and easy on the eyes, making everything from scrolling to streaming feel effortless. Its compact size and lightweight design make the S26 particularly comfortable to use one-handed, while still maintaining a premium feel thanks to its glass and aluminium build. Battery performance is one of the standout aspects in daily use. The S26 feels efficient and dependable, easily lasting through a full day and often beyond with moderate usage. It performs especially well in everyday tasks like social media, browsing, and connectivity-heavy scenarios, where optimisation is clearly noticeable. Charging speeds remain modest, but they are consistent and predictable. Overall, the Galaxy S26 offers a smooth, dependable user experience that focuses on refinement and efficiency. It may not be the most exciting flagship on paper, but in everyday use, it proves to be one of the most reliable and well-rounded devices in its class. VCX (Valued Camera eXperience) The VCX Forum  has been working with its members on the system and infrastructure as a non-profit organisation. We strive to improve our technology to develop and exchange accurate and objective quality and performance indicators, which is our ultimate goal. We will also serve as a compass for the smartphone camera industry. We appreciate your interest in the VCX Forum. VCX Forum: No review Background The Samsung Group  is a South Korean multinational conglomerate headquartered in Samsung Town, Seoul. It comprises numerous affiliated businesses, most united under the Samsung brand. Samsung Electronics has assembly plants and sales networks in 74 countries and employs around 290,000 people. Samsung is a major manufacturer of electronic components such as lithium-ion batteries, semiconductors, image sensors, camera modules and displays for clients such as Apple, Sony, HTC and Nokia. Written by Marcella Frattari   is the Communication Marketing and Lead Generation Manager at SmartViser, playing a key role in shaping the company's communication and marketing strategies. With a background in journalism and a passion for digital communication, Marcella focuses on improving SmartViser's overall online presence and engagement. Her dedication to clear, effective communication and creative content makes her a valuable asset to the team. Press Contact Marcella Frattari: Contact@visermark.com Our Resources ViserMark Scores ViserMark Reviews Success Stories Latest Articles Discover what ViserMark is all about. Read ViserMark's latest in-depth smartphone battery reviews. Discover our main success stories with Telecoms and other industries. Read more articles on our battery life, performance reviews, and test results. Know more Know more Know more Know more

SMARTPHONE TIER: HIGH TIER Battery Capacity mAh: 5500 Xiaomi 15T: Big Screen, Strong Camera, Balanced Power SMARTPHONE BATTERY PERFORMANCE Based on Price: High Tier (€500-€699) High  Tier Ranking # 3 Learn more: Quick Summary ViserMark Labels Specifications Know the Test Results ViserMark Verdict Video Review - Soon Available The Xiaomi 15T is a high-tier smartphone positioned just below flagships, designed to deliver a near-premium experience while avoiding the excesses and pricing of top-end models. Rather than acting as a compromise device, it focuses on refining core flagship traits such as display quality, battery endurance, camera reliability, and long-term software support. The result is a phone that feels deliberately upscale and complete, aimed at users who want flagship polish without paying for marginal gains they may never notice. From a design perspective, the Xiaomi 15T adopts a restrained, modern aesthetic that prioritises solidity and usability over visual theatrics. It features flat front and rear surfaces with softly rounded corners, creating a shape that is comfortable to hold despite its large footprint. Measuring approximately 163.2 mm in height, 78.0 mm in width, and just 7.5 mm in thickness, and weighing around 194 grams, it is undeniably large but well balanced. While the mid-frame is plastic rather than metal, the chassis is rigid and well assembled, avoiding the hollow or flimsy sensation common in cheaper devices. Gorilla Glass 7i protects the front, the rear uses a reinforced glass-fiber material, and the phone carries an IP68 rating with protection rated up to 3 metres of water submersion, reinforcing its high-tier credentials. The display is one of the Xiaomi 15T ’s defining strengths. It uses a large 6.83-inch AMOLED panel with a resolution of 2772 × 1280 pixels, delivering a sharp image and excellent colour depth. Support for HDR10+ and Dolby Vision places it firmly in flagship territory for media consumption. Peak brightness is advertised at up to 3200 nits, and real-world measurements confirm outstanding outdoor visibility, making the phone easy to use even under harsh sunlight. The 120 Hz refresh rate ensures smooth scrolling and fluid animations, and while the panel relies on LTPS rather than LTPO technology, the overall experience still feels fast and refined in daily use. Performance is driven by the MediaTek Dimensity 8400 Ultra chipset, paired with 12 GB of LPDDR5X RAM and fast UFS 4.1 storage. This setup is not marketed as cutting-edge flagship silicon, but it delivers consistently smooth performance across everyday tasks, multitasking, and gaming. Combined with Xiaomi’s IceLoop cooling system, the phone maintains stable performance under sustained loads, avoiding aggressive throttling. In practical terms, the Xiaomi 15T feels responsive, dependable, and comfortably powerful enough for several years of use, aligning with expectations for a high-tier device rather than a performance-focused niche phone. Photography is handled by a triple-camera system tuned in collaboration with Leica. The 50-megapixel main camera with optical image stabilisation produces detailed, well-balanced images in daylight and performs reliably in low-light conditions. The 50-megapixel 2× telephoto camera delivers clean, sharp results at its native zoom level and is particularly effective for portraits and everyday zoomed shots. The 12-megapixel ultrawide camera is the weakest of the trio, offering respectable results but limited versatility due to the lack of autofocus. Video capture is a strong point, with support for 4K recording at up to 60 frames per second, HDR10+ output, and effective stabilisation across cameras, making it suitable for serious casual content creation. Battery life is another area where the Xiaomi 15T feels firmly high-tier. Its 5500 mAh battery comfortably lasts a full day of heavy use and often extends into a second day with lighter workloads. Charging is handled via 67 W wired fast charging, allowing a full recharge in just over 50 minutes. While this is no longer the fastest standard on the market and wireless charging is absent, charging performance remains reliable and practical for everyday use. Connectivity and features are comprehensive, including 5G support, dual SIM with eSIM capability, Wi-Fi 6E, Bluetooth 6.0, NFC in supported regions, and an infrared blaster for controlling household devices. Audio is delivered through stereo speakers with Dolby Atmos support, offering good loudness and clarity, even if bass depth is limited. Biometric security is managed via an under-display optical fingerprint sensor that is fast and accurate in daily use. On the software side, the Xiaomi 15T runs Android 15 with HyperOS 2. The interface is feature-rich, fast, and integrated with a wide suite of AI tools, including photo editing, transcription, translation, and productivity enhancements. Importantly, Xiaomi commits to four major Android version upgrades and six years of security updates, placing the device among the better-supported phones in its class and reinforcing its long-term value. Overall, the Xiaomi 15T should be understood as a high-tier smartphone that prioritises balance and refinement over spectacle. It delivers a flagship-grade display, strong battery life, dependable performance, capable cameras, and extended software support, while making conscious trade-offs such as the absence of wireless charging and a simpler ultrawide camera. For users seeking a polished, premium-feeling phone that covers all essential bases without the cost or excess of true flagship models, the Xiaomi 15T stands out as a confident and well-judged choice. Pros Cons Large, high-quality 6.83-inch AMOLED display with sharp 2772 × 1280 resolution and smooth 120Hz refresh rate Plastic mid-frame, which feels solid but lacks the premium tactility of aluminium competitors Excellent peak brightness (measured over 1500 nits auto, advertised up to 3200 nits), ensuring strong outdoor visibility and HDR performance No wireless charging, a notable omission for a high-tier device in 2025 IP68 dust and water resistance, rated up to 3m submersion, which is rare at this tier Ultrawide camera lacks autofocus, limiting versatility and preventing macro use Dimensity 8400 Ultra delivers consistently smooth real-world performance with good sustained behaviour thanks to effective cooling 2× telephoto lacks OIS, reducing consistency in low-light zoom shots 12GB LPDDR5X RAM and UFS 4.1 storage provide fast multitasking and long-term usability Digital zoom beyond 2× quickly softens, making the Pro model far superior for long-range zoom Leica-tuned 50MP main camera with OIS produces detailed, well-balanced photos with reliable low-light performance LTPS display instead of LTPO, resulting in less efficient refresh-rate management compared to some rivals Clean and sharp 2× optical telephoto camera, well suited for portraits and everyday zoom shots USB-C limited to USB 2.0 speeds, with no video output support Strong video capabilities, including 4K@60fps with HDR10+ and effective stabilisation Relies on a virtual proximity sensor rather than a hardware unit, which can be less reliable in edge cases Large 5500mAh battery delivers dependable all-day endurance and often stretches into a second day HyperOS 2 includes preinstalled apps and services that may feel unnecessary to some users 67W wired fast charging, allowing a full recharge in just over 50 minutes Charging speeds are no longer class-leading as rivals push 90W–120W solutions Four Android version upgrades and six years of security updates, placing it among the better-supported high-tier phones Comprehensive connectivity, including 5G, Wi-Fi 6E, Bluetooth 6.0, NFC (market dependent), eSIM, and an infrared blaster Stereo speakers with Dolby Atmos support and a fast, accurate under-display fingerprint sensor   ViserMark Labels for th e Xiaomi 15T Please take a look at the following information about the battery performance of the Xiaomi 15T : Battery Life: The Xiaomi 15T delivers strong real-world endurance for a performance-oriented device, reaching up to 44 hours of active use, which translates to roughly a day and a half under balanced usage conditions. This places it very close to the high-tier average and clearly ahead of its predecessor, the Xiaomi 14T. Despite its large 6.83-inch AMOLED display, high brightness capability, and more powerful chipset, the 15T maintains stable runtime thanks to improved efficiency in camera, gaming, and mixed-use scenarios. While it does not reach the extended runtimes of efficiency-focused devices with lower performance ceilings, it offers dependable endurance without aggressive background restrictions. For users who want flagship-class responsiveness and multimedia capability while still achieving reliable day-and-a-half battery life, the Xiaomi 15T proves to be a well-balanced and dependable option. Battery Charging: Charging performance is solid, though not class-leading for the segment. In testing, the Xiaomi 15T required approximately 1 hour and 22 minutes to charge from empty to full, reflecting a more conservative charging curve prioritising battery longevity and thermal stability. While this is slower than some ultra-fast charging competitors, it remains practical for daily use, particularly given the device’s large 5,500 mAh battery capacity. Quick top-ups still provide meaningful recovery during short charging sessions, even if the final stretch to 100% is more gradual. Wireless charging is not supported, but the overall wired charging behaviour favours consistency and battery health over peak headline speeds. Battery Performance & Efficiency: The Xiaomi 15T stands out through performance-balanced power management rather than extreme energy-saving tuning. Task-based testing shows measurable efficiency gains over the Xiaomi 14T, especially in camera operation, gaming, and media playback, suggesting improved chipset and imaging pipeline optimisation. Annual energy consumption measures at around 4.0 kWh, aligning with high-tier hardware expectations given the large display and sustained performance profile. Its overall battery performance score of 43 reflects this positioning, a device that prioritises output capability while maintaining stable endurance. These results show Xiaomi’s focus on delivering consistent real-world usage without restricting performance, making the Xiaomi 15T a strong option for users who value reliability and power over absolute charging speed or ultra-low energy draw. Specification Overview  - Released Date: September 2025 Body & Build: Dimensions: 163.2 × 78 × 7.5 mm Weight: 194 g Materials: Glass front (Gorilla Glass 7i), plastic frame, fiber-reinforced plastic back Durability: IP68 – dust-tight and water resistant (immersible up to 3m for 30 minutes) Design: Large, flat-edged design with slim profile and symmetrical camera module; understated and professional aesthetic; rigid chassis despite plastic frame, with a solid, well-balanced in-hand feel Display: Size: 6.83-inch AMOLED Resolution: 2772 × 1280 pixels, ~447 ppi Refresh Rate: 120Hz (LTPS, adaptive behaviour via software) Brightness: Up to 3200 nits peak (HDR, partial area); ~1500+ nits measured in auto mode HDR Support: Dolby Vision and HDR10+ Protection: Corning Gorilla Glass 7i (Mohs level 6) Operating System: OS: Android 15 with HyperOS Upgrades: Upgradable to Android 16 / HyperOS 3 Support Policy: Up to 4 major Android OS updates and 6 years of security patches (Xiaomi policy as of 2025) Chipset & Performance: Processor: MediaTek Dimensity 8400 Ultra (4 nm) CPU: Octa-core (1× Cortex-A725 @ 3.25 GHz + 3× Cortex-A725 @ 3.0 GHz + 4× Cortex-A725 @ 2.1 GHz) GPU: Mali-G720 MC7 Thermal Management: IceLoop cooling system for sustained performance Memory & Storage: Configurations: 256GB + 12GB RAM 512GB + 12GB RAM Expandable Storage: Not supported Storage Technology: UFS 4.1 Connectivity & Features: Network: GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G SIM: Dual Nano-SIM Dual Nano-SIM + eSIM (maximum two active at a time) Wi-Fi: Wi-Fi 6E Bluetooth: Bluetooth 6.0 NFC: Available (market-dependent) Infrared Blaster: Yes USB-C: USB Type-C 2.0 (OTG supported, no video output) Biometrics: Under-display optical fingerprint sensor Other Features: Circle to Search, Google Gemini integration, AI photo editing, AI transcription and translation tools, accelerometer, gyroscope, compass, virtual proximity sensor Audio: Speakers: Stereo speakers with Dolby Atmos 3.5mm Jack: Not included Audio Support: 24-bit / 192kHz Hi-Res and Hi-Res Wireless audio Camera System: Rear Cameras (Triple Leica-tuned system): 50MP main (f/1.7, OIS, PDAF, 1/1.55" sensor) 50MP telephoto (f/1.9, PDAF, 2× optical zoom) 12MP ultrawide (f/2.2, 120° FoV, fixed focus) Rear Video: 4K@30/60fps 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps 10-bit Rec. 2020, HDR10+, gyro-EIS Front Camera: 32MP selfie camera (f/2.2, fixed focus) Front Video: 4K@30fps, HDR10+ Colours Available: Black, Gray and Rose Gold Performance - HOW WE TEST ViserMark  offers a comprehensive range of battery performance test results based on different criteria and benchmarks for evaluating a smartphone's performance. Our tests are performed using the strictest protocol in a controlled environment to ensure repetition and consistency powered by SmartViser's test auto mation solution viSer . Translating technical specifications into consumer benefits with SmartViser VWS Analytics Studio  is a complementary product to the viSer Test Automation solution. It enhances the viSer user experience and is the fastest way to analyse and view smartphone test results. We have used the interactive dashboard to show you the recent test results and translated them into ViserMark Labels. Join our readers to receive the latest update to our smartphone battery performance scores and performance reviews as soon as we finish testing! Smartphone Battery Performance - FULL TEST RESULTS AND REVIEW ViserMark has put the Xiaomi 15T through our testing protocol, based on real smartphone usage from 100% battery level down to power off. This includes daily activities, such as calls, web, video and music streaming, gaming, social networks, picture and video capture, and standby. All activities are executed in a defined order and timeline.   These test results, show how the Xiaomi 15T performed and the scores achieved. 1. Battery Performance The Xiaomi 15T achieved a battery performance score of 43/100, placing it slightly below the high-tier reference average (44.33) and just behind both the Xiaomi 14T and Google Pixel 8a (45). This positions the Xiaomi 15T as a performance-oriented device with a balanced, rather than endurance-focused, power profile. While it does not lead its class in raw efficiency scores, it maintains stable energy behaviour across demanding workloads such as gaming, camera usage, and high-brightness multimedia consumption. The result reflects Xiaomi’s tuning strategy: prioritising sustained performance and display output over aggressive energy saving. Instead of chasing extreme battery benchmarks, the 15T delivers consistent, predictable battery behaviour, which is often more valuable in real-world daily use. Charging is handled through 67W wired fast charging, with full recharge measured at approximately 1 hour and 22 minutes. This places the Xiaomi 15T in the solid mid-to-upper tier for charging performance, though not among the ultra-fast charging leaders. The charging curve appears deliberately controlled in later stages, suggesting a focus on thermal stability and long-term battery health rather than peak speed figures. As is increasingly common, no charger is included in the box. Wireless and reverse charging are not supported, but the wired solution remains reliable and sufficient for daily routines, particularly considering the device’s large 5,500 mAh battery.ts pricing tier. Overall, the Xiaomi 15T demonstrates a performance-balanced energy profile. SmartViser workload testing indicates improved efficiency compared to the Xiaomi 14T in camera, gaming, and media tasks, despite similar battery capacity. Annual energy consumption sits around 4.0 kWh, aligning with expectations for a large-display, high-brightness smartphone designed for sustained output. For users, this translates to dependable day-and-a-half endurance without compromising performance responsiveness. The Xiaomi 15T may not be positioned as an ultra-endurance device, but it delivers a stable, well-optimised balance between power, performance, and usability within its category. 2. Battery Life In ViserMark’s battery life testing, the Xiaomi 15T delivered up to 44 hours of active usage, corresponding to approximately 1.5 days of typical real-world use. This places it closely aligned with the high-tier reference average (43.67 hours / 1.67 days) and ahead of the Xiaomi 14T , which reached 39 hours (1.5 days). While it does not match the longer endurance of the Google Pixel 8a at 48 hours (2 days), the Xiaomi 15T remains firmly within the upper range of performance-focused smartphones rather than efficiency-prioritised devices. This level of endurance is achieved despite the Xiaomi 15T operating a large 6.83-inch high-brightness AMOLED display and maintaining stable performance under demanding workloads. The results indicate effective power management from the Dimensity platform and Xiaomi’s system optimisation, allowing sustained usage without aggressive background limitations or noticeable performance throttling. Compared with the broader high-tier category, the Xiaomi 15T demonstrates a balanced conversion of battery capacity into usable active time while maintaining strong multimedia and gaming performance. When compared directly with its closest generational competitor, the Xiaomi 14T , the Xiaomi 15T shows a measurable improvement in active usage hours, particularly in camera operation, media playback, and gaming scenarios. Although the Google Pixel 8a achieves a longer runtime overall, its advantage is linked more closely to conservative power tuning rather than performance output. The Xiaomi 15T instead maintains higher sustained performance during heavy tasks, reflecting a different optimisation philosophy. For everyday users, the Xiaomi 15T ’s day-and-a-half battery life provides reliable coverage for mixed usage patterns including streaming, browsing, social media, navigation, and photography. Even heavier users can comfortably complete a full day with reserve capacity remaining. Overall, the Xiaomi 15T positions itself as a performance-balanced endurance device, delivering consistent battery life that aligns well with its large display and high-output hardware profile within the upper smartphone tier. 3.   Battery Consumption The Xiaomi 15T and Xiaomi 14T  were analysed for battery consumption across a wide range of everyday tasks using SmartViser's viSer and VWS Analytics Studio . The comparison highlighted differences in power usage for activities such as social media, calls, gaming, camera, and web browsing. During social media usage, the Xiaomi 15T shows lower power draw than the Xiaomi 14T , indicating better efficiency during continuous scrolling and high screen-on activity. This suggests improved display power management and background process optimisation in the newer model. In outgoing voice calls, the Xiaomi 15T again demonstrates a clear advantage, consuming significantly less power, reflecting more efficient modem and system-level communication handling. In gaming, both devices perform at a very similar level. The Xiaomi 15T and Xiaomi 14T are effectively on par, with only a negligible difference. This indicates that efficiency under sustained graphical load remains comparable between generations rather than being a major improvement area. For download and upload tasks, the trend reverses. The Xiaomi 15T actually draws more power than the Xiaomi 14T . This suggests the newer device may be operating at higher throughput or maintaining more aggressive performance states during data transfer, trading a bit of efficiency for speed or responsiveness. Camera usage is where the Xiaomi 15T shows a major generational gain. The 15T consumes substantially less power than the Xiaomi 14T during extended camera use. Given that camera workloads are among the most demanding tasks, this points to significant optimisation in the imaging pipeline and ISP efficiency in the newer model. In media-related tasks, results are mixed but lean in favour of the Xiaomi 15T . During YouTube streaming and video replay, the 15T is more efficient in replay but slightly less efficient in streaming. In media player, both are very close, showing near parity. Web browsing also shows minimal difference, with the Xiaomi 14T holding a small efficiency edge. Overall, the Xiaomi 15T exhibits a more balanced and workload-optimised power profile rather than across-the-board lower consumption. It is clearly more efficient in communication and especially camera operation, roughly equal in gaming and audio playback, but slightly more demanding during data transfer and some streaming scenarios. These differences reflect shifting optimisation priorities: the Xiaomi 15T improves efficiency in high-impact, hardware-intensive tasks like imaging, while maintaining similar or slightly higher consumption in networking-heavy workloads.misation. When comparing the Xiaomi 15T  with the Google Pixel 8a across SmartViser’s battery consumption tests, the differences in optimisation become immediately clear. Although both devices occupy the same mid-tier category, their behaviour under everyday workloads reflects two distinct energy-management approaches. During social media usage, the Google Pixel 8a draws less power than the Xiaomi 15T , giving it an efficiency advantage in screen-on, app-driven scenarios. The same trend appears in gaming, where the Pixel 8a is noticeably more efficient, suggesting stronger control over sustained graphical workloads. This indicates Google’s platform is tuned to minimise energy draw even when performance demands increase. In download and upload tasks, the Google Pixel 8a again consumes less power, showing better efficiency during network-intensive activity. YouTube streaming follows the same pattern, with the Pixel maintaining lower consumption during extended video playback sessions. Camera usage and outgoing call is one of the few areas where the Xiaomi 15T shows an advantage. It draws less power than the Google Pixel 8a during extended camera operation, pointing to more efficient imaging pipeline behaviour under this specific heavy workload. In voice calls, the Xiaomi 15T is slightly more efficient, consuming less power during sustained communication. However, in YouTube, replay, media player, and web browsing, the Google Pixel 8a consistently records lower energy draw. These are common everyday scenarios, and the Pixel’s advantage here contributes meaningfully to its overall endurance performance. Overall, the Google Pixel 8a demonstrates broader efficiency leadership across light-to-moderate usage tasks such as browsing, streaming, gaming, and networking. The Xiaomi 15T, in contrast, shows targeted efficiency strengths in camera use and voice communication, while otherwise operating with a slightly more power-demanding but performance-oriented profile. The difference reflects two philosophies, Google emphasises energy conservation across most workloads, while Xiaomi balances efficiency with sustained output in more hardware-intensive scenarios. When comparing the battery behaviour of the Xiaomi 15T , Xiaomi 14T , Google Pixel 8a , and the high-tier reference using SmartViser’s viSer testing, it becomes clear that each phone approaches power management very differently, and these differences heavily influence real-world endurance. The Google Pixel 8a  is the most consistently efficient device overall. It consumes less power than the other phones in most everyday scenarios, including social media, gaming, data transfer, YouTube streaming, replay, media player, and web browsing. Its tuning clearly prioritises energy conservation across both light and moderate workloads. While it is not the most efficient in camera use or voice calls, its broad efficiency advantage across common daily tasks gives it the strongest overall efficiency profile. The Xiaomi 15T  follows a more performance-balanced strategy. It is clearly more efficient than both the Xiaomi 14T and the Google Pixel 8a in camera usage and also performs strongly in outgoing voice calls, showing focused optimisation in communication and imaging workloads. In gaming, it sits between the Pixel 8a and the high-tier average, indicating balanced efficiency under graphical load. However, in areas such as streaming, media player, social media, and web browsing, it typically draws more power than the Pixel and often slightly more than the high-tier reference, reflecting its more performance-oriented tuning. The Xiaomi 14T  shows the highest consumption in several heavy workloads, particularly camera use and social media activity, and generally draws more power than the Xiaomi 15T . While it remains closer to the high-tier reference in lighter tasks like media player and browsing, it lacks the refinement of the newer model, especially in hardware-intensive scenarios. Its profile reflects a less efficient balance between performance and power compared with the 15T. Compared with the high-tier reference average, the Google Pixel 8a operates below the norm in most categories, highlighting strong efficiency optimisation. The Xiaomi 15T alternates around this reference, outperforming it in camera and call scenarios but exceeding it in many display- and media-heavy tasks. The Xiaomi 14T more frequently draws above the reference level, indicating higher overall consumption. 4.   Battery Efficiency In ViserMark’s battery efficiency evaluation, the Xiaomi 15T  received a 0.5-leaf rating, placing it below the high-tier reference level and behind both the Xiaomi 14T and the Google Pixel 8a . Within this comparison group, the Pixel 8a holds the strongest efficiency position, while the Xiaomi 15T sits at the more performance-oriented end of the scale. These results indicate that the 15T is not tuned primarily for maximum energy conservation, but instead balances efficiency with sustained hardware output. This efficiency score reflects the Xiaomi 15T ’s behaviour under real-world workloads. While it shows targeted optimisation in camera use and voice communication, it draws more power in many display- and media-heavy tasks such as social media, streaming, and browsing. The device maintains stable performance without aggressive background limitations, but this consistency comes with a slightly higher baseline energy demand compared with more efficiency-focused models. The lower leaf rating suggests that the Xiaomi 15T relies more on battery capacity and performance management rather than ultra-aggressive power saving. Unlike the Google Pixel 8a , which achieves a higher efficiency score through conservative system tuning, the 15T prioritises responsiveness and sustained performance, particularly in hardware-intensive scenarios like imaging and multitasking. 5.   Annual Energy Consumption According to ViserMark’s annual energy consumption testing, the Xiaomi 15T  records an estimated usage of around 4 kWh per year, placing it slightly above the high-tier reference average and below the Xiaomi 14T . This result reflects the Xiaomi 15T’s positioning as a performance-balanced device rather than an efficiency-first model, with long-term energy use influenced by its large display, high brightness capability, and sustained hardware performance. The Xiaomi 14T  shows the highest annual energy consumption in this group, aligning with its higher power draw across several demanding tasks such as social media, camera usage, and extended multimedia activity. Its consumption profile indicates a less refined balance between performance and efficiency compared with the newer Xiaomi 15T. The Google Pixel 8a  achieves the lowest annual energy consumption among the devices compared. This reflects its consistently lower power draw in common daily workloads such as browsing, streaming, gaming, and media playback. Its efficiency-focused system tuning enables reduced long-term energy use, even though it operates within the same high-tier category. Overall, the Xiaomi 15T demonstrates a controlled but performance-oriented energy profile. While it does not match the Pixel 8a’s long-term efficiency, it improves over the Xiaomi 14T and remains reasonably close to the high-tier reference level. This balance allows the Xiaomi 15T to support a large display and high sustained performance while keeping annual energy consumption within a manageable range, positioning it as a capable yet moderately efficient option in the upper smartphone segment. Who Should Buy the Xiaomi 15T? The Xiaomi 15T  is best suited for users who want a large, high-quality display, strong everyday performance, and a reliable camera system, and who are comfortable with battery behaviour that is balanced for performance, not tuned for maximum efficiency in light media tasks. This phone is ideal for people who prioritise screen quality and overall device experience. The large, very bright AMOLED panel makes everything look excellent, from apps to video to photos, and it holds up well outdoors. If your focus is visual comfort, immersion, and a near-flagship display experience at a lower price, the 15T delivers strongly here. It is also a strong fit for users who take a lot of photos and use their camera frequently. Your test results show that the Xiaomi 15T is notably more efficient in camera workloads than both its predecessor and some competitors. That means heavy photo use does not punish the battery as much as expected for a device with this class of imaging hardware. For people who regularly document daily life, events, or travel, this is a practical advantage. The 15T also suits users who want consistent performance without aggressive power-saving behaviour. It does not rely heavily on background restrictions to stretch battery life, so multitasking, app switching, and longer active sessions feel stable and responsive. If you dislike phones that slow down or kill apps too quickly in the name of battery saving, this behaviour works in your favour. Where the Xiaomi 15T is not the best match is for users whose day is dominated by long streaming sessions, heavy browsing, and continuous social media scrolling, and who want maximum battery efficiency in those exact activities. Your results show that in tasks like YouTube, web browsing, and several media scenarios, the 15T draws more power than efficiency-focused devices like the Pixel 8a. Battery life is still solid overall, but it achieves that through capacity and balanced tuning rather than class-leading efficiency in display-heavy tasks. It is also not aimed at hardcore mobile gamers chasing top sustained frame rates, even though gaming performance is stable. Nor is it the right choice for people who insist on features like wireless charging or compact size. ViserMark VERDICT The Xiaomi 15T - what's it like to use? Using the Xiaomi 15T  feels like carrying a large, confident, performance-balanced phone that prioritises screen quality, camera usability, and stable responsiveness over ultra-aggressive battery saving. Day-to-day tasks such as messaging, navigation, multitasking, and general app use feel smooth and reliable. HyperOS runs fluidly, app switching is stable, and the phone doesn’t feel like it’s constantly trying to shut things down in the background to protect battery. That gives the 15T a more natural, “always ready” feel compared with efficiency-first devices that can feel more restrictive. The 6.83-inch AMOLED display is a defining part of the experience. It’s large, very bright, and visually punchy, which makes video, photos, maps, and general browsing look excellent. Outdoors, visibility is a clear strength. The 120 Hz refresh rate keeps interactions feeling fluid, and combined with the size, this makes the 15T especially comfortable for media and content-heavy use from a visual  standpoint. Where usage diverges from pure “media phone” expectations is in power behaviour. Your test results show that during streaming, long browsing sessions, and extended social media use, the Xiaomi 15T draws more power than efficiency-focused devices like the Pixel 8a and even slightly more than the high-tier reference in some cases. In practice, this means the phone still lasts well, but it is not squeezing maximum runtime out of these screen-heavy tasks. The big, bright display and performance-oriented tuning clearly take priority over ultra-low consumption here. In contrast, the 15T feels especially well-optimised during camera use and voice calls. Your measurements show clear efficiency gains in camera workloads compared with the previous generation and an advantage over some competitors. For users who take photos frequently throughout the day, this translates into less “battery shock” from heavy camera sessions than you might expect from a large, high-brightness device. Performance under mixed and heavier use feels stable. Jumping between apps, using navigation while streaming audio, or handling data-heavy apps does not make the phone feel fragile or close to its limits. It maintains responsiveness without sudden slowdowns, which reinforces its identity as a balanced high-tier device rather than a lightly tuned efficiency model. Gaming performance is solid for mainstream titles, and thermals remain under control, but this is not a gaming-specialist phone designed for sustained maximum frame rates. Similarly, charging is dependable but not extreme: it’s fast enough for daily life, but not part of the “fastest charging in class” race. VCX (Valued Camera eXperience) The VCX Forum  has been working with its members on the system and infrastructure as a non-profit organisation. We strive to improve our technology to develop and exchange accurate and objective quality and performance indicators, which is our ultimate goal. We will also serve as a compass for the smartphone camera industry. We appreciate your interest in the VCX Forum. VCX Forum: No review Background Xiaomi  was founded in 2010 by serial entrepreneur Lei Jun, with a vision to deliver high-quality technology at accessible prices. Committed to a user-centric approach, Xiaomi quickly gained traction in the mobile internet space. By 2014, the company had sold over 61 million smartphones and expanded into key markets including Taiwan, Hong Kong, Singapore, Malaysia, the Philippines, India, Indonesia, and Brazil. Headquartered in Beijing, China, Xiaomi continues its global expansion with offices across the Asia-Pacific region, India, and Brazil, positioning itself as a rising global tech brand. Written by Marcella Frattari   is the Communication Marketing and Lead Generation Manager at SmartViser, playing a key role in shaping the company's communication and marketing strategies. With a background in journalism and a passion for digital communication, Marcella focuses on improving SmartViser's overall online presence and engagement. Her dedication to clear, effective communication and creative content makes her a valuable asset to the team. Press Contact Marcella Frattari: Contact@visermark.com Our Resources ViserMark Scores ViserMark Reviews Success Stories Latest Articles Discover what ViserMark is all about. Read ViserMark's latest in-depth smartphone battery reviews. Discover our main success stories with Telecoms and other industries. Read more articles on our battery life, performance reviews, and test results. Know more Know more Know more Know more

SMARTPHONE TIER: MID TIER Battery Capacity mAh: 5300 Honor 400: Efficiency-Driven Performance in the Mid-Range SMARTPHONE BATTERY PERFORMANCE Based on Price: Mid Tier (€200-€499) Mid  Tier Ranking # 1 Learn more: Quick Summary ViserMark Labels Specifications Know the Test Results ViserMark Verdict Video Review - Soon Available The Honor 400 is a mid-range smartphone designed to deliver a premium-feeling experience without entering flagship pricing territory. Rather than prioritising raw performance figures, Honor focuses on display quality, photography, AI-assisted software features, and long-term usability. The result is a device that feels more sophisticated than its price suggests, appealing to users who value visual quality, camera versatility, and extended software support over benchmark dominance. In terms of design, the Honor 400 adopts a clean, modern aesthetic with flat surfaces and restrained detailing. The front is dominated by a 6.55-inch AMOLED display with a resolution of 2736 by 1264 pixels, translating to a sharp pixel density of roughly 460 pixels per inch. The panel supports a 60–120 Hz adaptive refresh rate, allowing smooth scrolling and responsive animations while scaling back when high refresh rates are unnecessary. One of the display’s most notable characteristics is its extremely high peak brightness, which can reach up to 5000 nits in HDR scenarios. While this peak applies only to small portions of the screen, it still results in excellent outdoor visibility and strong HDR performance. The flat panel design improves usability and reduces accidental edge touches, and the phone carries an IP65 rating, offering protection against dust and water splashes. Physically, the Honor 400 measures approximately 157 millimetres in height, 75 millimetres in width, and just 7.3 millimetres in thickness, with a weight of around 184 grams. This makes it compact and comfortable to handle compared to many modern mid-range devices. Although the frame and rear panel are made from plastic, the finish is solid and well-executed, avoiding the hollow feel common in cheaper handsets. The camera module is distinctive without being overly decorative, and colour options such as Midnight Black, Meteor Silver, and Desert Gold reinforce the phone’s understated, premium-leaning design language. Performance is handled by Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 chipset, built on a 4-nanometre process. This processor delivers smooth and reliable performance for everyday activities such as web browsing, messaging, video streaming, navigation, and multitasking. While it does not compete with higher-tier chips found in performance-focused rivals, real-world responsiveness is consistently good. Casual and moderately demanding games run without issue at sensible settings, though the device is clearly not designed for sustained high-end gaming. Memory and storage configurations typically include 8 GB or 12 GB of RAM paired with 256 GB or 512 GB of internal storage, providing ample capacity for long-term use without expandable storage. Photography is one of the Honor 400 ’s strongest areas. The rear camera system is built around a 200-megapixel main sensor with an f/1.9 aperture and optical image stabilisation. This sensor uses pixel binning to produce detailed 12.5-megapixel images with strong dynamic range and natural colour rendering. Despite the absence of a dedicated telephoto lens, the high-resolution sensor enables convincing 2× zoom and usable 4× zoom through sensor cropping, outperforming many mid-range competitors in this regard. A 12-megapixel ultra-wide camera also functions as a macro lens, offering added versatility, though it delivers less detail than the main sensor. On the front, a 50-megapixel selfie camera produces sharp, well-exposed images, though the lack of autofocus can occasionally lead to softer results at very close distances. Video recording supports up to 4K at 30 frames per second across all cameras, which is competitive for its class. Battery performance is region-dependent. In Europe, the Honor 400 is equipped with a 5300 mAh silicon-carbon battery, while some other markets receive a larger 6000 mAh version. In everyday mixed usage, the phone comfortably lasts a full day and can stretch into a second day with lighter use. While its endurance is no longer class-leading in a market increasingly populated by ultra-large batteries, performance remains dependable and consistent. Charging is handled exclusively via cable, with support for up to 66 watts of wired fast charging, allowing a full recharge in under an hour with a compatible charger. Wireless charging is not included, reflecting the device’s mid-range positioning. Connectivity is comprehensive and modern. The Honor 400 supports 5G networks, Wi-Fi 6, Bluetooth, USB Type-C, and NFC (availability varies by market). An infrared blaster is also included, enabling the phone to control compatible household electronics. Audio is delivered through a stereo speaker setup that provides good volume and clarity, though bass output is limited. Biometric security is managed by an under-display fingerprint sensor, which is reliable and accurate, if not as fast as ultrasonic alternatives. On the software side, the Honor 400 ships with Android 15 layered with MagicOS 9.0. The interface places heavy emphasis on AI-assisted features, including live translation, transcription, contextual app suggestions, and a wide range of image-editing and generative tools such as image-to-video creation. While not every AI feature feels essential, the overall suite adds meaningful value and helps differentiate the device from more conservative competitors. MagicOS continues to divide opinion due to its iOS-inspired design choices and preinstalled apps, but performance is smooth and customisation options are extensive. Crucially, Honor commits to six years of Android version updates and security patches, placing the Honor 400 among the best-supported smartphones in its price segment. Overall, the Honor 400 represents a carefully balanced approach to the modern mid-range smartphone. It does not aim to dominate performance charts, but instead excels in areas that matter most to everyday users: a high-quality display, a highly capable main camera, reliable battery life, fast wired charging, and exceptional software longevity. For users seeking a refined, future-proof smartphone with strong photographic credentials and long-term support, without stepping into flagship pricing, the Honor 400 stands out as a compelling and well-rounded choice. Pros Cons Excellent 6.55-inch AMOLED display with sharp 2736 × 1264 resolution and smooth 60–120Hz adaptive refresh rate Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 offers only moderate performance, with little improvement over the previous generation Extremely high peak brightness (up to 5000 nits HDR), delivering outstanding outdoor visibility and HDR performance Not ideal for sustained heavy gaming compared to performance-focused rivals 200MP main camera with OIS produces highly detailed photos with strong dynamic range and natural colours No dedicated telephoto camera, limiting optical zoom flexibility Convincing 2× and usable 4× zoom via sensor cropping despite the absence of a dedicated telephoto lens No wireless charging, which is becoming more common in this price range Wide range of AI-assisted photography and editing tools, including image-to-video generation and advanced portrait modes No expandable storage via microSD card 6 years of Android OS and security updates, placing it among the best-supported phones in its class MagicOS includes noticeable bloatware and an iOS-inspired layout that may not appeal to all users Slim, lightweight design that feels well balanced and comfortable in hand Plastic frame and rear panel feel less premium than metal alternatives IP65 dust and water resistance, offering better protection than many mid-range competitors AI features are inconsistent in usefulness, with some feeling more experimental than practical 66W wired fast charging, enabling a full recharge in under an hour Excellent real-world battery efficiency, outperforming the mid-tier average in SmartViser testing with lower annual energy consumption, longer usage time (up to ~56 hours), and a higher overall battery performance score Useful extras such as infrared blaster, stereo speakers, and under-display fingerprint sensor   ViserMark Labels for th e Honor 400 Please take a look at the following information about the battery performance of the Honor 400 : Battery Life: The Honor 400 delivers a notably strong real-world endurance performance, achieving up to 56 hours of active use, which translates to approximately two full days under balanced usage conditions. This places it clearly ahead of the mid-tier average and above competitors such as the Motorola Moto G56 5G and the Honor 200 Lite. Even with its bright 6.55-inch AMOLED display and high peak brightness capability, the Honor 400 maintains consistent runtime thanks to effective system optimisation and the efficiency of the Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 platform. For users who value dependable multi-day battery life without aggressive power management compromises, the Honor 400 proves to be a reliable and well-balanced option. Battery Charging: Charging performance is a clear strength of the Honor 400. The device supports 66-watt wired fast charging, allowing it to recharge from empty to full in under one hour with a compatible power adapter. This represents a meaningful advantage over more conservatively charged competitors in the same price bracket and positions the Honor 400 competitively within the mid-range segment. As with many modern devices, no charger is included in the box, requiring users to supply their own suitable USB-C charger to reach peak speeds. Wireless charging is not supported, but given the rapid wired charging performance, this omission is unlikely to be a major drawback for most users. Battery Performance & Efficiency: Where the Honor 400 truly stands out is in battery efficiency and energy optimisation. SmartViser’s task-based testing shows that the device outperforms the mid-tier average across a wide range of real-world scenarios, including social media use, video playback, web browsing, and camera usage. Annual energy consumption was measured at approximately 3.1 kWh, which is significantly lower than the mid-tier reference value of 3.64 kWh and well below the Motorola Moto G56 5G’s 4.6 kWh. This efficiency is reflected in the Honor 400’s battery performance score of 54, surpassing both the mid-tier average and the Honor 200 Lite. These results highlight Honor’s strong hardware-software optimisation, enabling long usage times with reduced power draw and making the Honor 400 one of the most energy-efficient devices in its class. Specification Overview  - Released Date: September 2025 Body & Build: Dimensions: 157 × 75 × 7.3 mm Weight: 184g Materials: Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame Durability: IP65 – dust-tight and resistant to water jets Design: Slim, flat-edged design with a compact footprint; understated, premium-leaning finish with a distinctive dual-camera module; well balanced and comfortable for one-handed use Display: Size: 6.55-inch AMOLED Resolution: 2736 × 1264, ~460 ppi Refresh Rate: Adaptive 60–120Hz Brightness: Up to 5000 nits peak (HDR, partial area) HDR Support: HDR video playback supported (no formal Dolby Vision certification) Protection: Strengthened front glass (manufacturer-rated drop resistance; no Gorilla Glass branding specified) Operating System: OS: Android 15 with MagicOS 9.0 Support: 6 years of Android OS updates and security patches (Honor policy as of 2025) Chipset & Performance: Global Variant: Processor: Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3  (4nm) CPU: Octa-core (1× Cortex-A715 + 3× Cortex-A715 + 4× Cortex-A510 configuration) GPU: Adreno GPU Memory & Storage: Configurations: 256GB + 8GB RAM 256GB + 12GB RAM (market-dependent) 512GB + 12GB RAM (market-dependent) Expandable Storage: Not supported Storage Tech: UFS (generation not officially specified) Connectivity & Features: Network: GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G SIM: Nano-SIM / Dual Nano-SIM (market-dependent, no eSIM) Wi-Fi: Wi-Fi 6 Bluetooth: Bluetooth 5.x NFC: Available (market-dependent) Infrared Blaster: Yes USB-C: USB Type-C 2.0 Biometrics: Under-display fingerprint sensor Other Features: AI Photography, AI image-to-video generation, Magic Portal, Circle to Search, AI translation and transcription tools, accelerometer, gyroscope, compass, proximity sensor Audio: Speakers: Stereo speakers 3.5mm Jack: Not included Camera System: Rear Cameras: 200MP main (f/1.9, OIS, PDAF, ~1/1.4" sensor, pixel binning) 12MP ultrawide / macro (f/2.2, AF, ~102° FoV) Video: Up to 4K@30fps (rear cameras) Front Camera: 50MP (f/2.0, fixed focus) Video: 4K@30fps Colours Available: Midnight Black, Meteor Silver and Desert Gold Performance - HOW WE TEST ViserMark  offers a comprehensive range of battery performance test results based on different criteria and benchmarks for evaluating a smartphone's performance. Our tests are performed using the strictest protocol in a controlled environment to ensure repetition and consistency powered by SmartViser's test auto mation solution viSer . Translating technical specifications into consumer benefits with SmartViser VWS Analytics Studio  is a complementary product to the viSer Test Automation solution. It enhances the viSer user experience and is the fastest way to analyse and view smartphone test results. We have used the interactive dashboard to show you the recent test results and translated them into ViserMark Labels. Join our readers to receive the latest update to our smartphone battery performance scores and performance reviews as soon as we finish testing! Smartphone Battery Performance - FULL TEST RESULTS AND REVIEW ViserMark has put the Honor 400 through our testing protocol, based on real smartphone usage from 100% battery level down to power off. This includes daily activities, such as calls, web, video and music streaming, gaming, social networks, picture and video capture, and standby. All activities are executed in a defined order and timeline.   These test results, show how the Honor 400 performed and the scores achieved. 1. Battery Performance The Honor 400 achieved a battery performance score of 54/100, placing it well above the mid-tier average of 44.62/100 and clearly ahead of both the Motorola Moto G56 5G (40) and the Honor 200 Lite (46). This result positions the Honor 400 as one of the stronger battery performers in its segment, not only outperforming its direct competitors but also demonstrating a level of optimisation that exceeds what is typically expected in the mid-range category. While it does not compete with ultra-endurance-focused devices, the Honor 400 delivers a consistently high level of battery efficiency and stability across everyday use cases, reflecting a well-balanced and mature power profile. Charging is handled through 66W wired fast charging, allowing the device to reach a full charge in under one hour with a compatible charger. As is now common in this segment, no charger is included in the box. Compared to more conservatively charged rivals such as the Moto G56 5G and the Honor 200 Lite , the Honor 400 ’s charging performance is notably faster and more practical for daily use. Wireless and reverse charging are not supported, but the fast wired solution largely compensates for these omissions within its pricing tier. Overall, the Honor 400 demonstrates an excellent energy-to-performance ratio, particularly under real-world usage conditions. SmartViser workload testing shows that the device consumes less power than the Moto G56 5G across key scenarios. For everyday users, the Honor 400 offers a combination of long runtime, fast recharging, and high efficiency, making it one of the most convincing battery performers in the mid-range smartphone market. 2. Battery Life In ViserMark’s battery life testing, the Honor 400 delivered up to 56 hours of active usage, corresponding to approximately 2 full days of typical real-world use. This result places it clearly above the mid-tier average, which stands at around 46 hours (1.79 days), and well ahead of the Motorola Moto G56 5G , which achieved 39 hours (1.5 days). The Honor 400 also matches the endurance of the Honor 200 Lite in days of use, while extending its lead when measured in total active hours. This strong endurance is achieved despite the Honor 400 balancing a high-resolution AMOLED display and demanding usage scenarios. The results highlight effective power management from the Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 platform, which allows the device to sustain long runtimes without aggressive background restrictions or noticeable performance throttling. Compared to the broader mid-tier segment, the Honor 400 demonstrates a more efficient conversion of battery capacity into usable screen-on time. When compared directly with its closest competitors, the Honor 400 maintains a clear advantage. The Moto G56 5G falls noticeably behind in both hours and days of use, while the Honor 200 Lite , although competitive in total days, does not match the Honor 400’s longer active usage time. This indicates that the Honor 400 sustains heavier workloads more effectively, particularly during screen-intensive activities. For everyday users, the Honor 400 ’s two-day battery life provides a comfortable buffer for mixed usage patterns, including social media, video streaming, web browsing, and camera use. Even heavier users are likely to reach the end of a full day with significant charge remaining. Overall, the Honor 400 stands out as a strong endurance performer within the mid-range segment, delivering consistent and reliable battery life that exceeds typical expectations for its class. 3.   Battery Consumption The Honor 400 and Honor 200 Lite  were analysed for battery consumption across a wide range of everyday tasks using SmartViser's viSer and VWS Analytics Studio . The comparison highlighted differences in power usage for activities such as social media, calls, gaming, camera, and web browsing. During social media usage, the Honor 400 shows a slightly higher energy draw than the Honor 200 Lite , indicating marginally higher consumption during continuous scrolling and screen-on activity. However, this difference remains moderate and does not translate into a noticeable disadvantage in overall endurance. In outgoing voice calls, the situation is reversed: the Honor 400 consumes significantly less power than the Honor 200 Lite , highlighting more efficient handling of sustained connectivity and voice communication. In gaming, both devices perform at a similar level, with nearly identical power consumption. This suggests comparable efficiency under moderate graphical load, despite differences in chipset class and performance capability. For download and upload tasks, the Honor 400 again proves more efficient, drawing less power than the Honor 200 Lite during data-intensive background activity. Camera usage is one of the clearest differentiators. The Honor 400 consumes noticeably more power than the Honor 200 Lite during extended camera use, reflecting the higher demands of its more advanced imaging hardware and processing. This increased consumption is expected given the Honor 400’s stronger camera system and does not indicate poor optimisation. In media-related tasks, the results are mixed. During YouTube streaming, the Honor 200 Lite is slightly more efficient, while in video replay, the Honor 400 draws substantially more power. Conversely, during music playback, the Honor 400 is more efficient, consuming less energy than the Honor 200 Lite . Web browsing shows near parity between the two devices, with only minimal differences in consumption. Overall, the Honor 400 exhibits a more demanding but also more performance-oriented power profile. It is more efficient in communication, data transfer, and audio playback, while drawing more power during camera use and certain video workloads that place greater strain on its imaging hardware and processing pipeline. These higher consumption figures reflect the Honor 400’s stronger feature set rather than inefficient tuning. To offset its higher hardware demands, the Honor 400 uses a larger 5,300mAh battery, allowing it to support a more advanced display, camera system, and feature set while still achieving battery life results comparable to the Honor 200 Lite . The Honor 200 Lite, by contrast, relies on a simpler and less demanding platform paired with a 4,500mAh battery, benefiting from lower baseline power consumption. As a result, both devices reach similar overall battery performance scores through different approaches: the Honor 400 balances greater capability with increased capacity, while the Honor 200 Lite achieves efficiency through lighter workloads. This parity confirms that the Honor 400’s higher power draw reflects its technological improvements rather than weaker battery optimisation. When comparing the Honor 400 with the Motorola Moto G56 5G across SmartViser’s battery consumption tests, the differences in optimisation become immediately clear. Although both devices occupy the same mid-tier category, their behaviour under everyday workloads reflects two distinct energy-management approaches. During social media usage, the Motorola Moto G56 5G draws slightly more power than the Honor 400 , indicating higher energy consumption during continuous scrolling and screen interaction. This gives the Honor 400 a modest efficiency advantage in light, app-driven scenarios. The difference becomes far more pronounced in outgoing voice calls, where the Moto G56 5G consumes significantly more power than the Honor 400 , highlighting weaker optimisation for sustained connectivity. A similar pattern appears in gaming, where the Moto G56 5G again shows notably higher power draw, while the Honor 400 maintains tighter control under prolonged load. In download and upload tasks, the Honor 400 proves clearly more efficient, drawing considerably less power than the Moto G56 5G during data-intensive activity. Camera usage further reinforces this trend, capturing photos or recording video places a much heavier strain on the Moto G56 5G, whereas the Honor 400 remains comparatively restrained despite its more advanced imaging hardware. In media-related tasks, the results are more nuanced. During YouTube streaming and music playback, the Moto G56 5G consistently consumes more power, meaning long viewing or listening sessions drain its battery more quickly. In video replay, however, consumption levels are broadly similar between the two devices, with the Honor 400 drawing slightly more power than the Motorola. This difference is modest and does not materially affect overall endurance. Web browsing, which combines continuous display use with bursts of network activity, again favours the Honor 400 , as the Moto G56 5G shows higher and less stable power draw during extended sessions. In summary, the Honor 400 demonstrates superior battery optimisation across most tested workloads, consuming less power in communication, gaming, data transfers, camera use, streaming, and browsing. While video replay shows near parity, with a small efficiency edge for the Moto G56 5G , the Honor 400 remains the more balanced and battery-efficient device overall. Given that both devices are equipped with similarly sized batteries, this advantage highlights stronger optimisation on the Honor 400, making it particularly well suited to users with mixed or media-heavy usage patterns. When comparing the battery behaviour of the Honor 400 , Honor 200 Lite , and Motorola Moto G56 5G using SmartViser’s viSer testing, it becomes clear that each phone approaches power management very differently, and these differences heavily influence real-world endurance. The Honor 400 emerges as the most consistently efficient device overall. It consumes less power than the mid-tier average in nearly every category, including outgoing calls, gaming, downloads and uploads, YouTube streaming, media playback, and web browsing. While its consumption during social media use and camera activity is slightly higher than that of the Honor 200 Lite , it remains well below both the Moto G56 5G and the segment average. This balanced profile makes the Honor 400 particularly well suited to mixed and sustained usage patterns. The Honor 200 Lite delivers strong results in lighter workloads, especially social media, gaming, video replay, and web browsing, where it often matches or slightly outperforms the Honor 400 . However, it becomes less efficient during outgoing calls, data transfers, and media playback, and its camera usage draws significantly less power largely due to its simpler imaging hardware. Overall, it performs better than the mid-tier average in most categories but lacks the consistency of the Honor 400 under heavier or more diverse workloads. The Motorola Moto G56 5G shows the highest power consumption across nearly all tasks. It exceeds the mid-tier average in every usage category and draws substantially more power during calls, gaming, camera use, streaming, and browsing. While it remains functional in light social media use, its energy demand rises sharply once workloads intensify, making it the least efficient device in this comparison. Compared to the mid-tier reference, the Honor 400 consistently outperforms the segment norm, the Honor 200 Lite remains competitive with particularly good efficiency in lighter tasks, and the Moto G56 5G falls well behind due to persistently higher energy consumption. Overall, the results confirm the Honor 400 as the most refined and well-optimised device in this group, combining modern hardware capability with superior real-world battery efficiency. 4.   Battery Efficiency In ViserMark’s battery efficiency evaluation,  the Honor 400 achieved a 1.5-leaf rating, placing it above the mid-tier average of 1.08 leaves and clearly ahead of the Motorola Moto G56 5G , which scores just 0.5 leaves. The Honor 400 also matches the Honor 200 Lite , with both devices sharing the highest efficiency rating within this comparison group. These results position the Honor 400 among the more energy-efficient options in the mid-tier segment. This strong efficiency score reflects the Honor 400 ’s balanced handling of real-world workloads. Despite featuring more modern and demanding hardware, the device maintains controlled energy consumption across most active-use scenarios. Tasks such as social media, calls, browsing, and streaming are handled with stable and predictable power draw, avoiding the sharp spikes in consumption seen on the Moto G56 5G during screen-on or connectivity-heavy activity. The 1.5-leaf rating indicates that the Honor 400 does not merely rely on battery capacity to deliver endurance, but benefits from effective system optimisation. While it matches the Honor 200 Lite in overall efficiency score, the Honor 400 achieves this while supporting a more advanced feature set, highlighting stronger power management rather than lighter hardware demands. In summary, the Honor 400 stands out as a highly efficient mid-tier smartphone, outperforming the segment average and significantly surpassing the Moto G56 5G in energy efficiency. Its results confirm a well-optimised balance between modern performance and controlled power usage, making it a strong choice for users who want dependable endurance without sacrificing capability. 5.   Annual Energy Consumption According to ViserMark’s annual energy consumption testing, the Honor 400 records an estimated usage of 3.1 kWh per year, placing it well below the mid-tier average of 3.64 kWh and significantly lower than the Motorola Moto G56 5G , which reaches 4.6 kWh annually. This result highlights the Honor 400’s strong long-term efficiency, especially when compared with other mid-tier devices operating under similar real-world usage conditions. The Motorola Moto G56 5G  stands out as the least efficient device in this comparison, consuming substantially more energy over the course of a year. This aligns with its higher power draw across demanding tasks such as gaming, camera use, video streaming, and extended connectivity, all of which contribute to increased long-term energy consumption. The Honor 200 Lite  achieves the lowest annual energy consumption at 2.9 kWh, reflecting its lighter hardware demands and more conservative performance profile. The Honor 400 sits slightly above it, but this difference is modest and expected given the Honor 400’s more advanced display, camera system, and overall feature set. Overall, the Honor 400 demonstrates an excellent balance between capability and efficiency. Despite offering a more modern and demanding hardware platform than the Honor 200 Lite , it maintains annual energy consumption well below the segment average and far lower than the Moto G56 5G . This controlled consumption profile not only supports strong real-world battery life, but also contributes to lower long-term energy use, making the Honor 400 one of the more energy-efficient and sustainable choices in its class. Who Should Buy the Honor 400? The Honor 400  is an excellent choice for users who want a modern, well-rounded smartphone that balances advanced features with strong efficiency and dependable everyday performance. It is particularly well suited to people who value long battery life, fast charging, a high-quality display, and a capable camera system, without stepping into flagship pricing. With its bright AMOLED display, slim and lightweight design, and solid IP65 dust and water resistance, the Honor 400 appeals to users who want a device that feels contemporary and premium in daily use. Its high peak brightness makes it especially attractive for those who frequently use their phone outdoors, while its refined design ensures comfort during extended use. Combined with Honor’s long-term software support commitment, the Honor 400 is a good fit for users planning to keep their phone for several years. The Honor 400 stands out in battery efficiency and real-world endurance, making it ideal for users with mixed or media-heavy usage patterns. People who spend their day moving between social media, browsing, streaming video, navigation, messaging, and camera use will benefit from its balanced power management and consistent two-day battery life. Its strong optimisation allows it to handle heavier workloads more gracefully than many mid-tier rivals, without the rapid battery drain often seen in performance-focused devices. The phone is also a strong option for content creators and photography-focused users in the mid-range segment. Its advanced camera system delivers more flexibility and image quality than simpler alternatives, making it well suited for users who frequently capture photos or video as part of their daily routine. However, the Honor 400 is not aimed at hardcore gamers or users seeking flagship-level performance. While its chipset delivers smooth day-to-day responsiveness, it is not designed for sustained high-frame-rate gaming or intensive multitasking sessions. Likewise, users who prioritise wireless charging or premium materials such as metal frames may find the feature set slightly conservative. Charging is fast and practical thanks to 66W wired charging, but the lack of wireless charging may matter to some users accustomed to more premium conveniences. Ultimately, the Honor 400 is ideal for users who want a modern, efficient, and capable smartphone that excels in real-world use rather than benchmark chasing. It combines strong battery efficiency, fast charging, a high-quality display, and a capable camera system into a well-balanced package, making it an excellent choice for everyday users who want performance, endurance, and longevity without paying flagship prices. ViserMark VERDICT The Honor 400 - what's it like to use? Using the Honor 400 feels like engaging with a more modern, confident take on the mid-range smartphone experience, one that blends stronger hardware capabilities with careful optimisation. Day-to-day activities such as browsing, messaging, social media, navigation, and video streaming feel smooth and responsive, with MagicOS running fluidly across typical usage scenarios. Transitions are quick, multitasking is handled comfortably, and the overall experience feels refined rather than overstretched. The 6.55-inch AMOLED display plays a major role in shaping this experience. Colours are vibrant, contrast is deep, and the adaptive refresh rate helps keep scrolling and animations feeling natural without unnecessary battery drain. One of the most noticeable advantages in daily use is brightness: outdoor visibility is excellent, making the Honor 400 particularly comfortable to use in bright environments. The in-display fingerprint sensor is reliable and fast, unlocking the device with minimal delay and contributing to a seamless interaction flow. Where the Honor 400 really distinguishes itself is in how it handles mixed and heavier everyday workloads. Its newer platform allows it to move more confidently between tasks such as streaming, photography, browsing, and data-heavy apps without the sense of fragility often associated with mid-tier phones. The phone remains stable under load, and while it does draw more power when advanced features are used, this is well balanced by strong battery management and fast charging. That said, the Honor 400 is not designed as a hardcore gaming device. While casual and moderate gaming runs well, sustained high-performance gaming sessions can expose its thermal and performance limits compared to true flagship or gaming-focused models. MagicOS also has a distinct visual identity that may take some adjustment for users coming from stock Android or other ecosystems. Despite these caveats, the Honor 400 proves to be a confident, comfortable, and capable daily companion. It feels well suited to users who want a phone that can handle modern demands, including frequent camera use, media consumption, and multitasking, without constant concern for battery drain or responsiveness. Rather than chasing extreme performance, the Honor 400 focuses on delivering a smooth, bright, and efficient experience that fits naturally into everyday life, making it a strong and reassuring option in the mid-range space. VCX (Valued Camera eXperience) The VCX Forum  has been working with its members on the system and infrastructure as a non-profit organisation. We strive to improve our technology to develop and exchange accurate and objective quality and performance indicators, which is our ultimate goal. We will also serve as a compass for the smartphone camera industry. We appreciate your interest in the VCX Forum. VCX Forum: No review Background Established in 2013, HONOR  is a leading global provider of smart devices, committed to becoming an iconic tech brand that enables a smart life for all people, across all scenarios and channels. With over 13,000 employees, more than 60% of whom are dedicated to research and development, HONOR focuses on innovation, quality, and service. The brand's extensive R&D capabilities and forward-looking technology empower people worldwide to achieve more. HONOR's impressive portfolio of innovative products and a vast retail presence with over 45,000 stores support more than 200 million active devices, creating a new intelligent world for everyone. Written by Marcella Frattari   is the Communication Marketing and Lead Generation Manager at SmartViser, playing a key role in shaping the company's communication and marketing strategies. With a background in journalism and a passion for digital communication, Marcella focuses on improving SmartViser's overall online presence and engagement. Her dedication to clear, effective communication and creative content makes her a valuable asset to the team. Press Contact Marcella Frattari: Contact@visermark.com Our Resources ViserMark Scores ViserMark Reviews Success Stories Latest Articles Discover what ViserMark is all about. Read ViserMark's latest in-depth smartphone battery reviews. Discover our main success stories with Telecoms and other industries. Read more articles on our battery life, performance reviews, and test results. Know more Know more Know more Know more

SMARTPHONE TIER: MID TIER Battery Capacity mAh: 5000 Samsung Galaxy A17: A Budget-Friendly Mid-Tier Option SMARTPHONE BATTERY PERFORMANCE Based on Price: Mid Tier (€200-€499) Mid  Tier Ranking # 8 Learn more: Quick Summary ViserMark Labels Specifications Know the Test Results ViserMark Verdict Video Review - Soon Available The Samsung Galaxy A17 is an affordable mid-range smartphone designed to deliver a polished and dependable everyday experience. It stands out in its segment by combining a bright AMOLED display, optical image stabilisation, excellent battery optimisation, and one of the longest software support commitments on the market. Although positioned as a 4G-only device, the A17 succeeds by focusing on refinement, efficiency, and long-term usability rather than headline-grabbing performance metrics or premium-tier features. Visually, the Galaxy A17 presents a clean and modern aesthetic. Its 6.7-inch Super AMOLED screen offers a Full HD+ resolution of 1080 by 2340 pixels, with a sharp pixel density of roughly 385 ppi. The panel’s 90 Hz refresh rate provides smooth scrolling and responsive interaction, making everyday use pleasantly fluid. While peak brightness tops out at about 800 nits, which places it slightly below some competing models, the AMOLED technology ensures rich contrast, vivid colours, and comfortable visibility in most environments. The display is protected by Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+, elevating durability well beyond what is usually expected in the budget tier, and its IP54 certification offers resistance against dust and splashes. The device measures 164.4 millimetres in height, 77.9 millimetres in width, and just 7.5 millimetres in thickness, making it slim and lightweight at 190 grams. The front is covered with Victus+ glass, while the back and frame are constructed from plastic, maintaining durability without adding unnecessary weight. Samsung has updated the camera housing with a simplified vertical bump that distinguishes it from previous models such as the A16. The phone is available in Black, Gray, and Light Blue, following the brand's minimalist design language. Internally, the Galaxy A17 is powered by the MediaTek Helio G99, a 6-nanometre chipset built around a pair of Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.2 GHz and six Cortex-A55 cores at 2.0 GHz. This architecture provides reliable everyday performance for browsing, social media, video streaming, and multitasking, making the device well suited for users with moderate demands. The Mali-G57 MC2 GPU supports casual gaming and smooth multimedia playback, although more graphically intensive titles will require reduced settings. Storage configurations vary across markets and include combinations such as 128 GB with 4 GB, 6 GB, or 8 GB of RAM, as well as 256 GB options paired with either 4 GB or 8 GB of RAM. Storage can be expanded with a microSDXC card of up to two terabytes, although the slot shares space with the second SIM position. Photography is handled by a practical triple camera system. The main 50-megapixel wide-angle sensor features an f/1.8 aperture, phase detection autofocus, and optical image stabilisation, enabling sharper images and noticeably improved performance in low-light conditions. The secondary cameras include a 5-megapixel ultrawide lens and a 2-megapixel macro unit, which serve as functional but modest additions for wider scenes or close-up shots. Video recording is limited to 1080p at 30 frames per second, which is consistent with other devices in its price class, though the inclusion of OIS helps maintain smoother footage. On the front, a 13-megapixel camera captures clear selfies and can also record video in 1080p. One of the Galaxy A17 ’s strongest qualities is its battery performance. Equipped with a 5000 mAh battery and supporting 25-watt wired charging, the device achieves impressive longevity. In EU endurance testing, it reached an excellent runtime of 51 hours and 33 minutes, placing it comfortably among the most efficient devices in its class. The battery is also rated for up to 1200 charge cycles, indicating strong long-term durability. Independent SmartViser testing confirms the A17’s remarkable optimisation, showing that the device excels in scenarios such as gaming, video streaming, camera usage, and general web browsing. These results reflect Samsung’s careful tuning of the Helio G99 platform and demonstrate why the A17 consistently outperforms several competitors, including the Galaxy A26 and the Motorola Moto G56 5G, in real-world efficiency. Connectivity on the Galaxy A17 focuses on well-implemented essentials. The device supports 4G LTE networks and includes dual-band Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac for reliable wireless performance. Bluetooth 5.3 provides stable peripheral connections, while USB Type-C 2.0 ensures modern wired communication. Location services are comprehensive, with compatibility across GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, and QZSS systems. NFC is available in certain regions, and FM radio may be included depending on the market. The phone does not feature a 3.5 mm headphone jack, aligning it with the design direction of recent Samsung devices. Security is handled by a fast and responsive side-mounted fingerprint sensor, complemented by virtual proximity sensing and other essential motion and orientation sensors. On the software side, the Galaxy A17 ships with Android 15 and Samsung’s One UI 7 interface. The software experience is intuitive, customisable, and enriched with modern tools such as Circle to Search and Google’s Gemini assistant. What truly sets the device apart, however, is Samsung’s exceptional update policy: the A17 is promised six major Android upgrades, far surpassing typical support windows for this price tier and ensuring that the device remains secure and up-to-date for years to come. Overall, the Samsung Galaxy A17 presents a thoughtful blend of efficiency, durability, and long-term value. It may not offer 5G connectivity or flagship-level performance, but it excels in areas that matter most to everyday users. Its bright AMOLED display, reliable camera system with OIS, excellent battery longevity, and unmatched software support make it one of the most balanced and future-proof budget smartphones available in 2025. For users seeking a stable, long-lasting device with a refined user experience, the Galaxy A17 is an appealing and highly practical choice. Pros Cons Vivid 6.7-inch Super AMOLED display with Full HD+ resolution and smooth 90Hz refresh rate Performance is limited by the Helio G99 chipset, especially during gaming or heavier multitasking IP54 dust and splash resistance, offering everyday protection against rain and accidental spills Average outdoor brightness Optical image stabilisation on the 50MP main camera for steadier photos and clearer low-light results Secondary cameras are limited Good real-world efficiency with lower power consumption than most mid-tier competitors across daily tasks Slow charging for its class (25W) and no charger included Up to 8GB RAM and microSDXC support, allowing flexible storage expansion Plastic frame feels less premium than metal alternatives Gorilla Glass Victus+ protection on the front for improved scratch and impact resistance Shared SIM tray limits dual SIM and storage expansion flexibility Lightweight and slim design, making it comfortable for one-handed use despite its large display No stereo speakers Reliable side-mounted fingerprint sensor with fast unlock Occasional micro-lag in One UI 7 Clean One UI 7 interface with useful features like Circle to Search and Gemini integration (region-dependent) Only IP54 protection   ViserMark Labels for th e Samsung Galaxy A17 Please take a look at the following information about the battery performance of the Samsung Galaxy A17 : Battery Life: The Samsung Galaxy A17 delivers a strong showing in real-world endurance, achieving up to 39 hours of active use, or roughly a day and a half under balanced conditions. This places it slightly ahead of several mid-tier competitors and makes it a reliable option for users who prioritise stability over peak performance. Despite its large 6.7-inch AMOLED screen, the A17 manages to maintain consistent runtime thanks to Samsung’s well-calibrated software and the efficiency of the Helio G99 chipset. Battery Charging: Charging performance is handled by 25-watt wired charging, which, while adequate, is modest compared to some aggressively fast-charging alternatives in this segment. No charger is included in the box, so users will need to provide their own USB PD-compatible adapter for full-speed charging. In typical conditions, a full charge requires just over an hour and twenty minutes, making it faster than the Galaxy A26 but still behind brands such as Xiaomi and Motorola, which routinely offer 40W to 67W charging speeds at similar price levels. The A17 does not support wireless charging, and its USB-C 2.0 port limits both data transfer rates and charging flexibility. While the charging system is sufficient for overnight replenishment or quick daytime top-ups, it feels conservative in 2025, especially considering that competing devices have pushed charging standards forward in the mid-range category. Battery Performance & Efficiency: Where the Galaxy A17 truly distinguishes itself is in battery efficiency. SmartViser’s task-based tests reveal that the A17 is one of the most optimised devices in its class, outperforming both the Galaxy A26 and the Motorola Moto G56 5G across numerous real-world scenarios. Annual energy consumption was measured at 4.2 kWh, which is significantly better than the A26’s 4.6 kWh and moderately better than other mid-range competitors. The A17’s efficiency reflects Samsung’s careful tuning of the Helio G99 platform, resulting in smoother battery behaviour under load and more predictable endurance throughout the day. While its endurance is ultimately capped by the standard 5000 mAh battery, the Galaxy A17 compensates with excellent optimisation, making it one of the most battery-efficient LTE devices in its class. Specification Overview  - Released Date: September 2025 Body & Build: Dimensions: 164.4 x 77.9 x 7.5 mm Weight: 190g Materials: Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus+), plastic back, plastic frame Durability: IP54 – dust protected and resistant to water splashes Design: Slim and lightweight build with Samsung’s minimalist aesthetic; modernised camera bump and comfortable in hand Display: Size: 6.7-inch Super AMOLED Resolution: 2340 x 1080 (FHD+), ~385 ppi Refresh Rate: 90Hz Brightness: ~800 nits peak (measured) HDR Support: No HDR certification Protection: Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ (Mohs level 5) Operating System: OS: Android 15 with One UI 7 Support: Up to 6 major Android upgrades (Samsung policy as of 2025) Chipset & Performance: Global Variant: Processor: MediaTek Helio G99 (6nm) CPU: Octa-core (2x Cortex-A76 @ 2.2GHz + 6x Cortex-A55 @ 2.0GHz) GPU: Mali-G57 MC2 Memory & Storage: Configurations: 128GB + 4GB RAM 128GB + 6GB RAM 128GB + 8GB RAM 256GB + 4GB RAM 256GB + 8GB RAM Expandable Storage: microSDXC (shared SIM slot) Storage Tech: UFS 2.2 Connectivity & Features: Network: GSM / HSPA / LTE (No 5G support) SIM: Nano-SIM / Dual Nano-SIM (no eSIM) Wi-Fi: Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band Bluetooth: 5.3 NFC: Available (market-dependent) Radio: FM Radio (market-dependent) USB-C: USB Type-C 2.0, OTG Biometrics: Side-mounted fingerprint reader Other Features: Circle to Search, Gemini integration, virtual proximity sensor, compass, accelerometer Audio: Speakers: Single loudspeaker 3.5mm Jack: Not included Camera System: Rear Cameras: 50MP main (f/1.8, OIS, PDAF, 1/2.76", 0.64µm) 5MP ultrawide (f/2.2, 120° FoV) 2MP macro Video: 1080p@30fps Front Camera: 13MP (f/2.0), 1080p@30fps video recording Colours Available: Black, Gray, Light Blue. Performance - HOW WE TEST ViserMark  offers a comprehensive range of battery performance test results based on different criteria and benchmarks for evaluating a smartphone's performance. Our tests are performed using the strictest protocol in a controlled environment to ensure repetition and consistency powered by SmartViser's test auto mation solution viSer . Translating technical specifications into consumer benefits with SmartViser VWS Analytics Studio  is a complementary product to the viSer Test Automation solution. It enhances the viSer user experience and is the fastest way to analyse and view smartphone test results. We have used the interactive dashboard to show you the recent test results and translated them into ViserMark Labels. Join our readers to receive the latest update to our smartphone battery performance scores and performance reviews as soon as we finish testing! Smartphone Battery Performance - FULL TEST RESULTS AND REVIEW ViserMark has put the Samsung Galaxy A17 through our testing protocol, based on real smartphone usage from 100% battery level down to power off. This includes daily activities, such as calls, web, video and music streaming, gaming, social networks, picture and video capture, and standby. All activities are executed in a defined order and timeline.   These test results, show how the Samsung Galaxy A17 performed and the scores achieved. 1. Battery Performance The Samsung Galaxy A17 achieved a battery performance score of 42/100, placing it slightly above the mid-tier average of 44.52/100 and ahead of both the Motorola Moto G56 5G (40) and the Samsung Galaxy A26 (36). While it does not surpass the most efficient devices in the segment, the A17 clearly demonstrates better optimisation than Samsung’s own A26 and maintains stronger overall stamina than several competitors. Its score reflects a balanced battery profile: not class-leading, but reliably stable across most day-to-day scenarios. Charging is handled through 25W wired charging, though Samsung does not include a charger in the box. Using a certified USB PD charger, the Galaxy A17 reached a full charge in approximately 1 hour and 20 minutes, a notably faster result than the Galaxy A26 but still modest compared to the 40W to 67W charging solutions commonly offered by Chinese manufacturers in the same price bracket. The device does not support wireless or reverse charging, in line with expectations for its pricing tier. Overall, the Galaxy A17 demonstrates a positive energy-to-performance ratio, particularly under real-world usage conditions. SmartViser workload testing shows that the A17 is significantly more power-efficient than the A26 and often more stable than the Moto G56 5G , consuming less power during gaming, camera use, media playback, and web browsing. Its well-tuned behaviour under load suggests that Samsung’s optimisation of the Helio G99 platform is notably more effective here than on previous models. For everyday users, the Galaxy A17 offers dependable endurance and consistent efficiency, making it one of the stronger battery performers in Samsung’s affordable lineup. 2. Battery Life In ViserMark’s battery life testing, the Samsung Galaxy A17 delivered 39 hours of active usage, which corresponds to around 1.5 days of typical real-world use. This places it directly in line with the broader mid-tier segment, matching the endurance achieved by both the Motorola Moto G56 5G and its sibling, the Galaxy A26 . While not a standout performer, the A17 maintains a dependable level of stamina suitable for most everyday users. Despite sharing the same 5,000mAh battery capacity as many of its competitors, the A17 ’s endurance benefits from the relatively efficient MediaTek Helio G99 chipset, which shows better tuning here than in previous Samsung models. However, its overall battery life still falls short of the mid-tier average of 1.8 days, indicating that there is room for improvement in long-term power optimisation when the device is placed under heavier workloads. Although the A17 ’s endurance does not exceed that of its competitors, it performs consistently across the workload suite. The Moto G56 5G , powered by a more modern 5G-enabled platform, maintains similar longevity. Meanwhile, the Galaxy A26 , despite sharing the same battery capacity, lags slightly behind in efficiency due to higher power consumption and less refined optimisation. For everyday users, the A17 ’s 1.5-day longevity is sufficient, provided their routine does not involve extended gaming sessions, frequent camera usage, or continuous mobile data activity. Heavy users may push the battery to its limits sooner, but for the majority, the A17 delivers dependable day-to-day stamina. 3.   Battery Consumption The Samsung Galaxy A17 and Galaxy A26 were analysed for battery consumption across a wide range of everyday tasks using SmartViser's viSer and VWS Analytics Studio . The comparison highlighted differences in power usage for activities such as social media, calls, gaming, camera, and web browsing. During social media use and voice calls, the Galaxy A26 shows a noticeably higher energy drain, indicating that it is less efficient in tasks that involve sustained connectivity and continuous screen interaction. The Galaxy A17 , by contrast, handles these activities with much lower power consumption, resulting in a cooler device and slower battery decline during long communication or browsing sessions. Gaming and data-heavy tasks such as downloading and uploading further highlight the difference in tuning between the two models. The Galaxy A26 consumes considerably more power under these conditions, suggesting that its chipset and software optimisation struggle to maintain efficiency when placed under moderate to high load. The Galaxy A17 performs these same tasks more gracefully, drawing less energy and maintaining smoother performance over longer sessions. Camera usage also favours the Galaxy A17 . While neither device is particularly demanding in this category relative to others, the A26 still draws more power during extended shooting or video recording. The A17’s more efficient management here contributes to a more stable endurance profile, especially for users who use their camera frequently throughout the day. In media consumption, including YouTube streaming, video replay, and music playback, the Galaxy A26 again demonstrates higher consumption levels. This means that long periods of video viewing or media streaming will deplete its battery more quickly compared to the A17 , which remains more balanced and consistent across these tasks. Web browsing, which mixes display activity with bursts of network usage, also shows the A17 as the more efficient device. The A26 tends to drain faster during extended browsing sessions, making the A17 the better choice for users who spend long stretches reading, scrolling, or navigating web apps. In summary, while both smartphones deliver similar total battery life when measured in hours or days, the Galaxy A17 achieves this with clearly superior optimisation. It handles nearly all everyday tasks with lower energy consumption, cooler operation, and more predictable endurance. The Galaxy A26 , by contrast, displays higher power draw across the board, especially during communication, browsing, and media-intensive activities. For users who value consistent efficiency and the longest possible runtime between charges, the Galaxy A17 is the more effective and well-balanced device. When comparing the Samsung Galaxy A17 with the Motorola Moto G56 5G across SmartViser’s battery consumption tests, the differences in optimisation become immediately clear. Although both devices occupy the same mid-tier category, their behaviour under everyday workloads reflects two distinct energy-management approaches. In light social media use, the Moto G56 5G has a slight edge. It draws a bit less power while scrolling through feeds and interacting with apps, which can give it a small advantage for users who mainly live inside social platforms. Everywhere else, however, the balance shifts clearly in favour of the Galaxy A17 . During voice calls, the A17 consumes less energy, making it better suited to users who spend a lot of time on the phone. The difference becomes more pronounced in heavier workloads like gaming and large downloads or uploads, where the Motorola drains its battery faster, while the A17 manages to keep its consumption under tighter control. The gap is especially large when using the camera. Capturing photos or recording video puts a much heavier strain on the Moto G56 5G , whereas the Galaxy A17 remains comparatively frugal, making it a safer choice for people who shoot a lot of content. The same trend appears in YouTube streaming, video replay and general media playback: long viewing sessions eat through the battery more quickly on Motorola’s device, while Samsung’s phone stretches each charge further. Web browsing rounds out the picture. Over extended surfing sessions, the A17 again proves more efficient, maintaining a lower and steadier power draw than the Moto G56 5G . In short, the Moto G56 5G only wins on social media efficiency, but the Galaxy A17 is clearly better optimised for almost everything else: calls, gaming, data transfers, camera use, streaming and browsing. For users with mixed or media-heavy usage patterns, the A17 offers a more balanced and battery-friendly experience, while the Moto G56 5G mostly benefits those whose primary focus is social apps. When comparing the battery behaviour of the Samsung Galaxy A17 , Galaxy A26 and Motorola Moto G56 5G using SmartViser’s viSer testing, it becomes clear that each phone approaches power management very differently, and these differences heavily influence real-world endurance. The Samsung Galaxy A17  stands out as the most balanced and consistently efficient performer across everyday tasks. It handles social media, calls, gaming, browsing and streaming with noticeably lower battery drain than the other two models, making it the most stable option for users with mixed or continuous usage patterns. Its biggest strength is its ability to keep consumption moderate even during heavier activities such as gaming, camera use and large data transfers, where both the Galaxy A26 and the Moto G56 5G lose efficiency more quickly. The Motorola Moto G56 5G  performs closest to the A17 but only in a few lighter scenarios. It manages social media with slightly better efficiency than Samsung’s A17, but this advantage disappears the moment workloads increase. Once calls become extended, games become more demanding, or media playback continues for long sessions, the Moto G56 5G begins to draw substantially more power. Camera usage especially exposes its weaknesses, as it consumes far more energy than both Samsung devices during photo or video capture. The heavier drain across key tasks suggests that Motorola’s performance-oriented approach strains the battery more than expected for a mid-tier phone. The Samsung Galaxy A26 , meanwhile, sits at the opposite end of the spectrum. It consistently consumes the most power across nearly all active tasks, social media, calling, gaming, downloads, camera use, streaming, replay workloads and web browsing. This makes it the least efficient during real-world use. The A26’s battery endurance ultimately relies more on Samsung’s strong standby optimisation rather than active-use efficiency, which is why it can still deliver acceptable battery life for light or passive users despite its higher drain when the screen is on. Compared to the broader mid-tier average, the A17 performs better than typical phones in nearly every active task, the Moto G56 5G aligns more closely with the average but tends to spike during heavier workloads, and the A26 exceeds the average consumption in almost all categories. 4.   Battery Efficiency In ViserMark’s battery efficiency evaluation, the Samsung Galaxy A17 earned a 1-leaf rating, placing it comfortably above both the Motorola Moto G56 5G and the Samsung Galaxy A26 , which each score only half a leaf. Although the A17 does not reach the efficiency levels of the mid-tier average, it still demonstrates notably better optimisation than its two direct competitors in this group. This stronger efficiency profile stems from the way the A17 handles real-world workloads. While not perfect, the device shows comparatively restrained energy consumption across most active use scenarios. Tasks such as social media browsing, calls, and streaming see more moderate power draw on the A17 than on the Moto G56 5G or Galaxy A26 , both of which tend to drain their batteries more aggressively during screen-on or connectivity-heavy activity. This more controlled approach allows the A17 to maintain steadier performance throughout the day without the rapid dips seen on its rivals. The A17’s 1-leaf rating reflects the fact that while it is not the most efficient mid-tier smartphone available, it is clearly better optimised than these two competitors. It balances power and performance more effectively, providing a smoother and more predictable endurance profile. In summary, the Samsung Galaxy A17 stands as the more energy-conscious option  in this three-way comparison. It still leaves room for improvement relative to the broader market, but for users seeking a mid-range device with more controlled power usage and fewer unexpected drops in battery level, the A17 outperforms both the Moto G56 5G and the Galaxy A26 in overall efficiency. 5.   Annual Energy Consumption According to ViserMark’s annual energy consumption testing, the Samsung Galaxy A17 records an estimated usage of 4.2 kWh per year , positioning it slightly below the Motorola Moto G56 5G and clearly ahead of the  Samsung Galaxy A26 , both of which consume more energy over the same period. While the A17 does not reach the efficiency of the broader mid-tier average, it still reflects a better-tuned balance than its two closest competitors. The Moto G56 5G sits just above the A17 , consuming marginally more energy on a yearly basis. This aligns with its higher drain across several active use cases, including gaming, video streaming, and camera operation. The Galaxy A26 , meanwhile, stands as the least efficient device among the three, requiring noticeably more energy throughout the year due to its consistently higher draw during nearly all day-to-day tasks. Despite not being a class-leading performer, the Galaxy A17 distinguishes itself by offering a more restrained consumption pattern that benefits long-term sustainability and operational cost. Its annual energy use remains moderate, especially considering its large battery capacity and mid-range hardware, making it a more eco-conscious option within this comparison set. Who Should Buy the Samsung Galaxy A17 ? The Samsung Galaxy A17 is an excellent choice for users who want a practical, well-balanced smartphone that focuses on efficiency, longevity and everyday reliability rather than raw performance. It is particularly well-suited for people who value smooth day-to-day use, low energy consumption and a modern design, all without stretching their budget. With its Super AMOLED display, Gorilla Glass Victus+ protection and lightweight build, the A17 appeals to users who prefer a device that feels refined and comfortable in hand, yet remains durable enough for daily wear. Its IP54 rating is not as robust as the A26’s IP67 certification, but still provides reassuring resistance against dust and splashes. Combined with Samsung’s industry-leading software support, up to six major Android upgrades, the A17 is a strong match for anyone planning to keep their phone for several years. The A17 shines in battery efficiency, making it especially attractive for users with steady, moderate usage habits. Those who spend most of their time browsing, messaging, calling, or using social apps will appreciate its more controlled power consumption compared to competitors like the Galaxy A26 and the Moto G56 5G. Its stability in light-to-medium workloads makes it a dependable partner for students, casual users and professionals who value continuity over bursts of performance. However, the Galaxy A17 is not designed for heavy multitaskers, gamers or users who rely on intensive camera sessions. Its Helio G99 chipset is efficient but not performance-oriented, and while the device handles everyday tasks comfortably, it will not satisfy those who frequently engage in high-demand applications. The absence of 5G connectivity also makes it less suitable for users who prioritise the fastest network speeds or plan to keep their device well into a fully 5G-centric future. Charging remains limited to 25W, without a charger included, which may feel slow by 2025 standards, especially for users accustomed to faster charging technologies from other brands. Ultimately, the Samsung Galaxy A17 is ideal for practical users who prioritise stability, efficiency and long-term value, wrapped in a modern Samsung experience. It doesn’t try to impress with flashy performance metrics, instead, it delivers a thoughtful, energy-conscious smartphone that quietly excels at the tasks most people do every single day. ViserMark VERDICT The Samsung Galaxy A17 - what's it like to use? Using the Galaxy A17 feels like stepping into a well-balanced, thoughtfully tuned mid-range experience, one that prioritises efficiency, comfort and reliability over headline-grabbing specs. Everyday activities such as browsing, messaging, social media and video streaming run smoothly, particularly on the 6GB and 8GB RAM configurations, where One UI 7 feels fluid and responsive. Samsung’s software remains a strong point: clean, intuitive, and packed with subtle conveniences like Circle to Search and smart gestures that enhance usability without becoming intrusive. The 6.7-inch Super AMOLED panel contributes significantly to the A17 ’s pleasant day-to-day experience. Colours are vivid, contrast is rich, and despite the 90Hz refresh rate being more modest than the 120Hz screens found on pricier models, scrolling still feels natural and snappy. Brightness is adequate for most environments, though it may struggle slightly under harsh sunlight. The side-mounted fingerprint sensor is consistent and fast, making unlocking the device effortless. Where the Galaxy A17 stands out most is in its efficiency. The Helio G99 chipset may not be a performance powerhouse, but its strength lies in delivering stable, predictable behaviour with low energy draw. For the majority of tasks people perform daily, the phone remains cool, controlled and impressively frugal. Of course, the limitations become more visible when the A17 is pushed harder. Demanding games, complex multitasking or prolonged GPS sessions can expose its processing ceilings, leading to occasional slowdowns. Without 5G support, users who rely heavily on the fastest mobile data speeds may also feel constrained. Charging remains capped at 25W, acceptable for casual top-ups but slow for anyone used to faster charging technologies, especially since no charger is included. Despite these constraints, the Galaxy A17 proves to be a dependable and easygoing daily companion. Its sleek build, efficient software optimisation, and long-term update support make it a device that fits naturally into everyday life. It may not aim to impress power users, but for those who prioritise comfort, stability and battery-friendly performance, the A17 offers a reassuringly smooth and enjoyable experience. VCX (Valued Camera eXperience) The VCX Forum  has been working with its members on the system and infrastructure as a non-profit organisation. We strive to improve our technology to develop and exchange accurate and objective quality and performance indicators, which is our ultimate goal. We will also serve as a compass for the smartphone camera industry. We appreciate your interest in the VCX Forum. VCX Forum: No review Background The Samsung Group  is a South Korean multinational conglomerate headquartered in Samsung Town, Seoul. It comprises numerous affiliated businesses, most united under the Samsung brand. Samsung Electronics has assembly plants and sales networks in 74 countries and employs around 290,000 people. Samsung is a major manufacturer of electronic components such as lithium-ion batteries, semiconductors, image sensors, camera modules and displays for clients such as Apple, Sony, HTC and Nokia. Written by Marcella Frattari   is the Communication Marketing and Lead Generation Manager at SmartViser, playing a key role in shaping the company's communication and marketing strategies. With a background in journalism and a passion for digital communication, Marcella focuses on improving SmartViser's overall online presence and engagement. Her dedication to clear, effective communication and creative content makes her a valuable asset to the team. Press Contact Marcella Frattari: Contact@visermark.com Our Resources ViserMark Scores ViserMark Reviews Success Stories Latest Articles Discover what ViserMark is all about. Read ViserMark's latest in-depth smartphone battery reviews. Discover our main success stories with Telecoms and other industries. Read more articles on our battery life, performance reviews, and test results. Know more Know more Know more Know more

SMARTPHONE TIER: MID TIER Battery Capacity mAh: 5200 Motorola Moto G56 5G: A Rugged Mid-Range Phone With Big Battery Power SMARTPHONE BATTERY PERFORMANCE Based on Price: Mid Tier (€200-€499) Mid  Tier Ranking # 11 Learn more: Quick Summary ViserMark Labels Specifications Know the Test Results ViserMark Verdict Video Review - Soon Available The Motorola Moto G56 5G is another addition to the brand’s sprawling mid-range line-up, positioned as a practical choice for those who want reliable performance, a long-lasting battery, and a few thoughtful extras without paying premium prices. It doesn’t aim to reinvent the wheel or dazzle with cutting-edge hardware. Instead, it quietly leans on Motorola’s proven formula. Clean software, decent specifications, and small quality-of-life features that still matter to a lot of people. Motorola has never been about flashy designs, and the Moto G56 follows suit. The rear panel has a textured matte finish that resists fingerprints and provides good grip, while the dual-camera module is tidy and unobtrusive. At around 200 grams and 8.35 mm thick, it’s on the heavier side, but still ergonomic enough to handle comfortably. Durability is where the G56 really shines. With IP68 rating, it offers stronger water and dust resistance than most phones in this price bracket. Add Corning Gorilla Glass 7i protection on the display and compliance with MIL-STD-810H tests, and it’s clearly built to withstand everyday knocks, splashes, and even harsher conditions. Colour choices are restrained and practical, in darker and muted tones, but the overall build is sturdier than many glossy competitors. The phone carries a 6.72-inch Full HD+ LCD panel with a 120Hz refresh rate. It’s not OLED, so it lacks the deeper blacks and contrast of some rivals, but brightness is sufficient for outdoor use and colour reproduction is balanced, if slightly muted. Scrolling and animations feel smooth thanks to the high refresh rate, and for casual browsing or streaming, the display does the job well. Under the hood, the G56 runs on MediaTek’s Dimensity 7060 chipset, paired with up to 8GB of RAM and 128GB of storage (expandable via microSD in many markets). Everyday tasks are handled smoothly. Even light gaming runs fine at modest settings, though more demanding titles will show the phone’s limits. Reviewers have noted some occasional lag when multitasking or switching camera modes, but thermal management is solid, the phone doesn’t overheat easily under sustained use. Motorola’s software experience remains one of its biggest strengths. Running Android 15 with My UX, the interface feels clean, fast, and bloat-free. Handy gestures like the double twist to launch the camera or the chop motion to turn on the flashlight are still present, giving the G56 a bit of Motorola’s trademark convenience. The biggest downside is software longevity. Motorola promises two major Android updates and four years of security patches. That’s decent for a budget-friendly phone but well behind Samsung and Google, which now guarantee at least five years. If you keep your phone for a long time, this limitation is worth factoring in. On the camera side, the Moto G56 offers a 50 MP main sensor supported by an 8 MP ultrawide lens. In practice, daylight shots are sharp with decent dynamic range, though low-light performance is weaker due to the lack of optical image stabilisation (OIS). Video recording is capped at 1080p, putting it behind some rivals that now offer 4K at this tier. The 32 MP selfie camera is solid in good lighting but struggles in dim conditions. Overall, the setup is competent but far from standout, perfectly fine for casual users, but not for creators. One of the G56 ’s strongest points is its 5,200 mAh battery, which easily lasts a full day of heavy use and often stretches into a second day with lighter usage. Charging is handled by 30W wired TurboPower, which is adequate but slower than the 50W–65W speeds some rivals now bring to the mid-tier. There’s no wireless charging, but that’s par for the course at this price. Audio is another small strength. Stereo speakers with Dolby Atmos provide loud and reasonably balanced sound. Traditionalists will also appreciate the continued presence of a 3.5mm headphone jack and microSD card slot, both rare in 2025’s mid-range market. Connectivity includes 5G, NFC, Wi-Fi ac, and Bluetooth 5.3, covering all the essentials. Pros Cons Robust IP68/69 water and dust resistance, rare in this price bracket LCD panel instead of OLED, with weaker contrast and colours Large 6.72-inch FHD+ display with 120Hz refresh rate for smooth scrolling Camera system is basic: 50MP main is fine, but lacks OIS and tops out at 1080p video Solid 5,200mAh battery delivers easily a day and a half, often two Low-light photography is noisy; secondary sensors add little value Clean, near-stock Android 15 with handy Motorola gestures (torch, camera) Only two years of OS updates (four years of security patches) Stereo speakers with Dolby Atmos for loud, clear audio AI features in Essential Space feel basic and unfinished Retains 3.5mm headphone jack and microSD card slot Performance dips in heavier gaming or multitasking Reliable everyday performance with MediaTek Dimensity 7025 Chunky at 200g and 8.35mm, less sleek than some rivals Reliable everyday performance with MediaTek Dimensity 7025 Software support lags behind Samsung and Google’s long-term commitments Expandable storage option for those who need more space Comfortable matte-textured finish that resists fingerprints   ViserMark Labels for the Motorola Moto G56 5G Please take a look at the following information about the battery performance of the Motorola Moto G56 5G : Battery Life: The Motorola Moto G56 5G delivers endurance that is solid, if not class-leading. In testing, it managed around 39 hours of active use, translating to roughly a day and a half of real-world usage for most people. The sizeable 5,200mAh cell provides headroom for heavy scrolling, video playback, and light gaming without forcing a mid-day top-up. Compared to Samsung’s Galaxy A26, the G56 lasts longer under mixed loads, but it lags behind both the mid-tier average and the standout Nothing CMF Phone 2 Pro. While it won’t stretch comfortably into two full days, its stamina is still more than adequate for anyone who charges nightly. Battery Charging: Motorola equips the G56 with 30W wired charging, which feels modest in 2025’s mid-range market. A full charge takes around 1 hour 47 minutes, with a 50% boost achieved in just under 40 minutes using the supplied charger. There’s no wireless charging support, which is not unusual at this price, but worth flagging for anyone eyeing premium convenience. In short, the charging speed is functional rather than competitive, suited more to overnight top-ups than quick pit stops. Battery Performance & Efficiency: Independent measurements show the Moto G56 5G consuming about 4.3 kWh annually, which is less efficient than the mid-tier average (3.6 kWh) and notably behind the Nothing CMF Phone 2 Pro (2.9 kWh). Its efficiency rating of 0.5 “leaves” highlights a clear gap in optimisation, placing it alongside the Galaxy A26 rather than more refined rivals. In day-to-day use, this means the G56 handles casual tasks predictably well, but under heavier loads, drain levels spike more quickly than competitors. For users who value sheer endurance over cutting-edge efficiency, the Moto G56 is a dependable if unspectacular performer. Specification Overview  - Released Date: May 2025 Body & Build: Dimensions: 165.8 × 76.3 × 8.4 mm Weight: 200 g Materials: Glass front (Gorilla Glass 7i), plastic frame, silicone polymer (eco leather) back Durability: IP68 / IP69 dust-tight and water resistant (up to 1.5 m for 30 minutes, high-pressure water jets) Display: Size: 6.72 inches Resolution: 1080 × 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~392 ppi) Refresh Rate: 120 Hz Brightness: ~1000 nits typical / “High Brightness Mode” for outdoor use Protection: Corning Gorilla Glass 7i, Mohs hardness level 6 Operating System: OS: Android 15 with Motorola My UX customisations Chipset & Performance: Processor: MediaTek Dimensity 7060 (6 nm) CPU: Octa-core (2×2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 + 6×2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) GPU: IMG BXM-8-256 Memory & Storage: Configurations: 128 GB + 4 GB RAM / 128 GB + 8 GB RAM/ 256 GB + 8 GB RAM / 256 GB + 12 GB RAM / 512 GB + 12 GB RAM Expandable: microSDXC (shared SIM slot) Connectivity & Features: SIM: Single Nano-SIM, Dual Nano-SIM, Nano-SIM + eSIM 5G: Supported (Sub-6 GHz) Wi-Fi: Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band Bluetooth: 5.3, A2DP, LE NFC: Yes (region dependent) USB: USB Type-C 2.0 Biometrics: Side-mounted fingerprint sensor Sensors: Accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass Audio: Speakers: Stereo speakers with Dolby Atmos Headphone Jack: 3.5 mm present Camera System: Rear Cameras: 50 MP (f/1.8, 25mm wide, 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF) / 8 MP (f/2.2, 12mm ultrawide, 118˚ FOV, 1.12µm) Rear Features: LED flash, HDR, panorama Rear Video: 1080p@30/60fps Front Camera: 32 MP (f/2.2, wide, 0.7µm) HDR Video Recording:  Yes (1080p) Colours Available: Pantone Black Oyster, Pantone Gray Mist, Pantone Dazzling Blue, Pantone Dill Performance - HOW WE TEST ViserMark  offers a comprehensive range of battery performance test results based on different criteria and benchmarks for evaluating a smartphone's performance. Our tests are performed using the strictest protocol in a controlled environment to ensure repetition and consistency powered by SmartViser's test auto mation solution viSer . Translating technical specifications into consumer benefits with SmartViser VWS Analytics Studio  is a complementary product to the viSer Test Automation solution. It enhances the viSer user experience and is the fastest way to analyse and view smartphone test results. We have used the interactive dashboard to show you the recent test results and translated them into ViserMark Labels. Join our readers to receive the latest update to our smartphone battery performance scores and performance reviews as soon as we finish testing! Smartphone Battery Performance - FULL TEST RESULTS AND REVIEW ViserMark has put the Motorola Moto G56 5G through our testing protocol, based on real smartphone usage from 100% battery level down to power off. This includes daily activities, such as calls, web, video and music streaming, gaming, social networks, picture and video capture, and standby. All activities are executed in a defined order and timeline.   These test results, show how the Motorola Moto G56 5G performed and the scores achieved. 1. Battery Performance The Motorola Moto G56 5G  achieved a battery performance score of 40/100, placing it just above the Samsung Galaxy A26 (36) but below both the mid-tier average of 44.52 and standout rivals such as the Nothing CMF Phone 2 Pro (50). While its result underscores decent endurance, it also highlights the phone’s weaker efficiency compared to the best mid-range devices. Charging is managed through 30W wired TurboPower (USB PD 3.0). Motorola advertises quick top-ups that provide “hours of use in minutes,” but a full refill still takes around 1 hour 47 minutes in testing. This makes it adequate for overnight charging but slower than many similarly priced rivals, and there is no support for wireless or reverse charging, which keeps it firmly in mid-range territory. Overall, the Moto G56 5G offers reliable stamina with respectable charging speed. It’s a phone that can be trusted to get you through a busy day without stress, yet it lacks the energy optimisation and endurance polish that define the most efficient mid-range handsets of 2025. 2. Battery Life In ViserMark’s battery life testing, the Motorola Moto G56 5G  achieved 39 hours of active usage, which translates to around 1.5 days of typical use. This positions it slightly ahead of the Samsung Galaxy A26 (35 hours) but below the mid-tier average of 46 hours, and well short of the Nothing CMF Phone 2 Pro (55 hours). The result highlights the G56’s dependability for day-and-a-half endurance, but also underlines the efficiency gap compared to the best-optimised mid-range devices. The phone’s stamina comes courtesy of its 5,200mAh cell and MediaTek Dimensity 7060 chipset, which handle lighter tasks with ease, but see steeper drain under camera or calls than rivals like the CMF Phone 2 Pro . While not poor by any stretch, the G56 lacks the energy refinement that pushes other devices into the two-day club. For most users, the Moto G56 5G provides peace of mind across a full day with buffer into the next, and comfortably outpaces Samsung’s A26 . However, if efficiency and long-haul endurance are priorities, the CMF Phone 2 Pro  and even the category average remain more appealing benchmarks. 3.   Battery Consumption The Motorola Moto G56 5G  generally demonstrates lower power consumption than the Samsung Galaxy A26  in most everyday categories, including social media, outgoing calls, gaming, downloads/uploads, YouTube playback, and web browsing. This suggests the G56 is better optimised for sustained communication, connectivity, and general screen-on tasks, where the A26 tends to draw far more heavily on its battery. The balance shifts in camera use, where the Galaxy A26 proves more efficient. Meanwhile, in media playback, the two devices are almost identical, with no meaningful difference likely to be noticed in real-world use. Despite both devices carrying large batteries (5,200 mAh for the Moto G56 vs 5,000 mAh for the Galaxy A26 ), the Moto G56 5G ultimately delivers longer overall stamina in ViserMark’s testing. This reflects stronger system-level optimisation on Motorola’s part, whereas the Galaxy A26 ’s higher current draw across most categories undermines its endurance. When comparing the Motorola Moto G56 5G  with the Nothing CMF Phone 2 Pro , the data highlights two mid-tier devices with similar large batteries (5,200 mAh for the G56 vs 5,000 mAh for the CMF) but noticeably different efficiency profiles. The Moto G56 5G proves more frugal in several everyday categories, including social media and downloads/uploads, where its lower current draw suggests stronger optimisation for online-heavy use. For users who spend much of their time scrolling or messaging, the G56 offers an efficiency edge. By contrast, the CMF Phone 2 Pro dominates in the majority of demanding workloads, particularly outgoing calls, gaming, camera use, YouTube playback, and media consumption, where the G56 consumes more power. Even in web browsing, the CMF holds a slight advantage, highlighting its broader optimisation for sustained screen-on tasks. Overall, the Moto G56 5G is the better pick for light social and network activity, but the CMF Phone 2 Pro pulls ahead in both multimedia and performance-heavy scenarios. The trade-off is clear: Motorola prioritises endurance in lighter use, while Nothing’s CMF device is tuned for efficiency under load. When comparing battery efficiency across the Motorola Moto G56 5G , Samsung Galaxy A26 , Nothing CMF Phone 2 Pro , and the mid-tier average, clear differences emerge in how each device manages real-world power demands. The Moto G56 5G demonstrates a balanced profile overall. It draws slightly more power than the average in outgoing calls and camera use, but proves competitive in social media, downloads/uploads, and web browsing. Its efficiency in media playback and Youtube is also close to the segment benchmark, showing Motorola’s tuning focuses on steady all-round performance. The Samsung Galaxy A26 , by contrast, is the most power-hungry of the three. It consumes significantly more current across nearly every category, especially in social media, outgoing calls, and web browsing. Even with a similar battery size (~5,000 mAh), this high draw undermines its stamina, explaining why it lags behind in real-world endurance testing. The Nothing CMF Phone 2 Pro  stands out for its strong efficiency in gaming (-406 mA), YouTube (-427 mA), and media playback (-300 mA), making it well-suited for users who spend time on entertainment-heavy workloads. However, it pulls more current than average in downloads/uploads and also sits behind the G56 in calling, suggesting its optimisation prioritises multimedia rather than communication-heavy tasks. In short, the CMF Phone 2 Pro comes across as the most balanced of the three, optimised for consistent performance across varied usage. The Moto G56 5G delivers steady efficiency but leans slightly heavier on communication and camera tasks, while the Galaxy A26 struggles with high drain nearly everywhere. 4.   Battery Efficiency In ViserMark’s battery efficiency evaluation, the Motorola Moto G56 5G achieved a modest 0.5-leaf rating, placing it behind both the Nothing CMF Phone 2 Pro (1.5 leaves) and the mid-tier average of 1.09 leaves. This shows that, while the G56 maintains competitive battery life thanks to its large 5,200 mAh cell, it isn’t among the most finely optimised devices in its category. The score reflects a tuning profile that prioritises steady all-round performance rather than squeezing maximum efficiency out of every workload. While Motorola avoids the excessive peaks seen in the Samsung Galaxy A26 , its optimisation doesn’t reach the same level of refinement as the CMF Phone 2 Pro . 5.   Annual Energy Consumption According to ViserMark’s annual energy testing, the Motorola Moto G56 5G  consumes around 4.3 kWh per year, placing it above the mid-tier average of 3.59 kWh and significantly less efficient than the Nothing CMF Phone 2 Pro (2.9 kWh). Only the Samsung Galaxy A26  fares worse, drawing 4.6 kWh annually, making it the least efficient of the group. This result highlights the G56’s reliance on its large 5,200 mAh battery to deliver competitive endurance rather than on underlying hardware–software efficiency. While Motorola manages to avoid the excessive drain of the Galaxy A26 , its energy use still positions it closer to the higher end of the consumption scale. For everyday users, this means the G56 5G remains a dependable performer in real-world stamina but does so with a heavier annual energy footprint. In sustainability terms, it trails behind the CMF Phone 2 Pro , which balances endurance with far lower long-term consumption. Who Should Buy the Motorola Moto G56 5G ? The Motorola Moto G56 5G  is best suited for users who want a practical mid-range smartphone that prioritises durability, long-lasting battery life, and everyday usability over flashy extras. It doesn’t try to compete with premium rivals on cutting-edge features but instead delivers steady, reliable performance for those who simply want a phone that gets the job done. With its IP68 water and dust resistance, MIL-STD-810H compliance, and Corning Gorilla Glass 7i protection, the G56 stands out as one of the most rugged mid-rangers in its price range. Paired with a large 5,200 mAh battery, it comfortably lasts a day and a half for most people, making it a great fit for commuters, outdoor workers, or anyone who values endurance and toughness in a phone. Its 6.72-inch LCD with 120Hz refresh rate ensures smooth scrolling and solid visibility outdoors, even if it lacks the vibrancy of AMOLED competitors. Combined with clean Android 15 software, Motorola’s helpful gestures, and expandable storage plus a 3.5mm headphone jack, the G56 is ideal for students, families, and traditionalists who appreciate functionality and convenience over flashy design. That said, it’s not for everyone. The basic dual-camera system is fine for casual photography but lags behind rivals that now offer 4K video or OIS for low light. Similarly, gaming performance is limited, and the software support window (two OS updates, four years of patches) is shorter than what Samsung or Google now provide. In short, the Moto G56 5G is a dependable mid-range option for practical users, those who want rugged durability, strong everyday stamina, clean software, and legacy features like the headphone jack and microSD slot. It’s less suited to power users, gamers, or aspiring content creators, but for no-nonsense reliability at an affordable price, it makes a strong case. ViserMark VERDICT The Motorola Moto G56 5G  doesn’t try to steal headlines, but it delivers what matters: durability, dependable battery, and a no-nonsense experience. Where many mid-rang­ers cut corners, the G56 preserves useful basics—expandable storage, headphone jack—while reinforcing the shell with IP68 and MIL-STD durability. Its 6.72-inch 120Hz LCD won’t match the contrast of OLEDs, but it’s sufficiently bright for outdoor use and smooth in everyday use. Combined with Android 15 + My UX, the interface stays lean, responsive, and pleasantly free of bloat. Performance is solid for daily tasks, social media, browsing, messaging all feel smooth. But the G56 isn’t built for extremes; demanding 3D games or heavy multitasking expose its limits. The camera setup is straightforward: the 50 MP main + 8 MP ultrawide, with a 32 MP front, is serviceable in good light, though low-light and video capabilities are modest by current standards. The Moto G56 5G  is not the flashiest mid-ranger, but it’s one of the more reliable ones. It’s built for users who want a phone that just works—durably, predictably, and without frills—so long as your expectations don’t include top-tier cameras or update guarantees. VCX (Valued Camera eXperience) The VCX Forum  has been working with its members on the system and infrastructure as a non-profit organisation. We strive to improve our technology to develop and exchange accurate and objective quality and performance indicators, which is our ultimate goal. We will also serve as a compass for the smartphone camera industry. We appreciate your interest in the VCX Forum. VCX Forum: No review Background Motorola  is a well-established and innovative technology company known for its contributions to the telecommunications industry. Founded in 1928, Motorola has a rich history of pioneering achievements, including the development of the first handheld mobile phone. Today, the company continues to produce a wide range of consumer electronics, with a focus on smartphones that offer reliable performance, innovative features, and value for money. Motorola's smartphones are known for their durability, user-friendly interfaces, and strong battery life, making them a popular choice for consumers worldwide. Written by Marcella Frattari   is the Communication Marketing and Lead Generation Manager at SmartViser, playing a key role in shaping the company's communication and marketing strategies. With a background in journalism and a passion for digital communication, Marcella focuses on improving SmartViser's overall online presence and engagement. Her dedication to clear, effective communication and creative content makes her a valuable asset to the team. Press Contact Marcella Frattari: Contact@visermark.com Our Resources ViserMark Scores ViserMark Reviews Success Stories Latest Articles Discover what ViserMark is all about. Read ViserMark's latest in-depth smartphone battery reviews. Discover our main success stories with Telecoms and other industries. Read more articles on our battery life, performance reviews, and test results. Know more Know more Know more Know more

SMARTPHONE TIER: FLAGSHIP/PRO TIER Battery Capacity mAh: 4500 Motorola Razr 60:   fun, functional, and refreshingly uncomplicated SMARTPHONE BATTERY PERFORMANCE Based on Price: Flagship/Pro Tier (€700+) Mid  Tier Ranking # 9 Learn more: Quick Summary ViserMark Labels Specifications Know the Test Results ViserMark Verdict Video Review - Soon Available The Motorola Razr 60 represents the brand’s confident return to the foldable mainstream. It’s not a bleeding-edge flagship like its Ultra sibling, but rather a refined, well-balanced clamshell that aims to bring the flip-phone experience to a broader audience, combining modern hardware, a playful design, and sensible pricing. It doesn’t try to break records or redefine the category; instead, it focuses on making the flip format genuinely practical day to day. Motorola leans on what it does best: design that feels distinct without screaming for attention. The Razr 60 inherits the silhouette of its predecessors — compact when folded, tall and slim when open — while introducing softer edges and new Pantone-certified colours. The finish is smooth and tactile, with a nylon-inspired back that’s easy to grip and resists fingerprints. The stainless-steel hinge feels sturdy and reassuring, opening with a satisfying snap and staying firmly in place at intermediate angles. At 188 g and 15.9 mm thick when closed, it’s slightly heavier than a traditional smartphone but remains pocket-friendly. There’s no IP68 rating like on some slab phones, but Motorola has added IP48 protection, meaning it can withstand dust and the occasional splash without worry. It’s solidly built, with no creaks or flex, giving off a reassuring sense of precision engineering. The Razr 60 uses a dual-screen setup that makes the flip concept more than just nostalgic flair. Inside is a 6.9-inch LTPO pOLED panel with Full HD+ resolution (2640 × 1080) and a 120 Hz refresh rate. It’s crisp, bright, and vibrant, with a peak brightness around 3000 nits, more than enough for outdoor visibility. Colours are rich but well balanced, and the crease is barely noticeable in regular use. The outer 3.6-inch pOLED display isn’t as expansive as the Ultra’s 4-inch panel, but it’s perfectly functional for quick interactions, checking notifications, controlling music, replying to messages, or even watching short videos. Both screens are protected by Gorilla Glass Victus, and the stereo speakers with Dolby Atmos deliver surprisingly full sound for such a compact phone. Under the hood, Motorola opts for the MediaTek Dimensity 7400X (4 nm). A capable, energy-efficient midrange 5G chipset paired with 8 or 12 GB of RAM and up to 512 GB of storage (UFS 2.2). It’s not a powerhouse, but for everyday tasks like browsing, messaging, streaming, or multitasking, it feels smooth and responsive. The interface runs close to stock Android, free of bloat and unnecessary animations. Where the hardware starts to show its limits is in demanding gaming or sustained workloads. Titles like Honkai Star Rail tend to stutter at higher settings, and the phone can warm up under load, something several reviewers have noted. Still, performance remains consistent for casual use, and Motorola’s thermal management keeps it from overheating in normal scenarios. Running Android 15 with My UX, the Razr 60 maintains Motorola’s signature clean, user-friendly identity. It includes trademark gestures like the double-twist to open the camera or the chop motion to toggle the flashlight, and now adds Moto AI features such as automatic photo optimization, adaptive stabilization for video, and contextual suggestions that anticipate your next move. The only real disappointment is software longevity. Motorola promises three major Android updates and four years of security patches — decent, but well below Samsung’s seven-year commitment for its latest Flip series. That’s the main trade-off for its lower price. Motorola equips the Razr 60 with a 50 MP main sensor (f/1.7, OIS), a 13 MP ultra-wide/macro, and a 32 MP front camera. It’s a flexible and well-rounded setup that captures bright, detailed shots with accurate colours and solid dynamic range. The OIS helps keep handheld video steady, and the flip form factor allows creative angles or a “camcorder mode” by folding the phone halfway. Low-light performance is decent but not class-leading. The smaller sensor and midrange image processing mean detail softens in darker environments, and there’s no dedicated telephoto zoom. Still, for social media, travel photography, and casual use, it performs above expectations at this price point. Despite its slim frame, the Razr 60 houses a 4,500 mAh silicon–carbon battery. Charging is handled by 30 W TurboPower and 15 W wireless charging, refilling the battery from empty in around 70–80 minutes. Energy efficiency is good for its class, though Samsung’s Snapdragon-based rivals remain slightly more optimised under heavy loads. It’s not flawless, the Dimensity 7400X still trails Qualcomm’s latest chips in raw power and efficiency, and Motorola’s shorter update window may concern long-term users. But judged on its own terms, the Razr 60 is one of the most appealing foldables for the price: fun, functional, and refreshingly uncomplicated. Pros Cons Distinctive, premium foldable design with Pantone-certified colour finishes MediaTek Dimensity 7400X trails Snapdragon rivals in efficiency and sustained performance Compact, pocket-friendly form factor with solid stainless-steel hinge Noticeable heat build-up during long gaming sessions IP48 water and dust resistance — better than most midrange foldables 188 g weight and 15.9 mm folded thickness may feel chunky to some users Bright 6.9-inch LTPO pOLED display (3000 nits, 120 Hz) with vibrant colour accuracy Outer display smaller than the Razr 60 Ultra’s 4-inch panel Functional 3.6-inch external AMOLED screen for apps, notifications, and selfies Only three years of OS updates and four of security patches — below industry leaders Clean, near-stock Android 15 interface with classic Motorola gestures No expandable storage (UFS 2.2 only) Useful Moto AI tools: photo enhancement, adaptive video stabilization, contextual prompts Ultra-wide lens weaker in low light with visible noise and softness 50 MP main camera with OIS delivers crisp daylight shots and smooth video Limited camera versatility. No telephoto lens, and night shots lose detail Decent overall photo performance with versatile 13 MP ultra-wide/macro lens Battery efficiency under heavy load slightly below Samsung’s Flip 6 4,500 mAh silicon–carbon battery offers roughly 1.5 days of real-world use The Motorola Razr 60 does not include a 3.5 mm headphone jack Durable materials (Victus glass, metal frame, reinforced hinge) 30 W wired and 15 W wireless charging support Balanced stereo speakers with Dolby Atmos soundstage   ViserMark Labels for the Motorola Razr 60 Please take a look at the following information about the battery performance of the Motorola Razr 60 : Battery Life: The Motorola Razr 60 offers endurance that’s commendable for a compact foldable. In testing, it averaged around 41 hours of active use, translating to roughly a day and a half of real-world runtime for most users. Its 4,500 mAh silicon–carbon battery performs efficiently across everyday tasks like messaging, streaming, and social media, with moderate gaming or camera use rarely demanding a midday top-up. Battery Charging: Motorola equips the Razr 60 with 30 W TurboPower wired charging and 15 W wireless support. A full recharge takes around 70–80 minutes, with the battery reaching 50 percent in roughly 35 minutes using Motorola’s compatible charger. Battery Performance & Efficiency: The Razr 60 consumes approximately 3.6 kWh per year. Its efficiency rating of around 1.0 “leaf” reflects solid but not exceptional tuning. It’s optimised for typical daily use rather than sustained heavy workloads. Specification Overview  - Released Date: April 2025 Body & Build: Dimensions: Unfolded: 171.3 × 74 × 7.3 mm | Folded: 88.1 × 74 × 15.9 mm Weight: 188 g Materials: Plastic front (unfolded), glass front (folded, Gorilla Glass Victus), silicone polymer eco-leather back, aluminium frame (6000 series), stainless-steel hinge Durability: IP48 dust and water resistant (up to 1.5 m for 30 min, splash and dust protection) Display: Main Screen: 6.9 inches LTPO AMOLED, 1B colours, HDR10+, 120 Hz refresh rate Resolution: 1080 × 2640 pixels (~413 ppi) Brightness: Up to 3000 nits (peak) Protection: Gorilla Glass Victus Cover Display: 3.6 inches AMOLED, 90 Hz, HDR10+, 1056 × 1066 pixels (~413 ppi), 1700 nits (peak) Operating System: OS: Android 15 Interface: Motorola My UX with Moto Gestures and Moto AI enhancements Chipset & Performance: Processor: MediaTek Dimensity 7400X (4 nm) CPU: Octa-core (4×2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4×2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) GPU: Mali-G615 MC2 Memory & Storage: Configurations: 256 GB + 8 GB RAM / 256 GB + 12 GB RAM / 512 GB + 12 GB RAM Storage Type: UFS 2.2 Expandable: No microSD slot Connectivity & Features: SIM: Dual SIM (Nano-SIM + eSIM or Dual Nano-SIM, region dependent) 5G: Supported (Sub-6 GHz) Wi-Fi: Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6 or 6e (tri-band, region dependent) Bluetooth: 5.4, A2DP, LE NFC: Yes USB: USB Type-C 2.0 Biometrics: Side-mounted fingerprint sensor Sensors: Accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass Audio: Speakers: Stereo speakers with Dolby Atmos Headphone Jack: No 3.5 mm port Camera System: Rear Cameras: 50 MP (f/1.7, 25 mm wide, 1/1.95", 0.8 µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS) 13 MP (f/2.2, 120˚ ultra-wide/macro, 1/3.0", 1.12 µm, AF) Rear Features: Dual LED flash, HDR, panorama, Pantone Validated colour calibration Rear Video: 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS Front Camera: 32 MP (f/2.4, 25 mm wide, 1/3.14", 0.7 µm, HDR) Front Video: 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps Colours Available: Pantone Gibraltar Sea, Pantone Spring Bud, Pantone Lightest Sky. Performance - HOW WE TEST ViserMark  offers a comprehensive range of battery performance test results based on different criteria and benchmarks for evaluating a smartphone's performance. Our tests are performed using the strictest protocol in a controlled environment to ensure repetition and consistency powered by SmartViser's test auto mation solution viSer . Translating technical specifications into consumer benefits with SmartViser VWS Analytics Studio  is a complementary product to the viSer Test Automation solution. It enhances the viSer user experience and is the fastest way to analyse and view smartphone test results. We have used the interactive dashboard to show you the recent test results and translated them into ViserMark Labels. Join our readers to receive the latest update to our smartphone battery performance scores and performance reviews as soon as we finish testing! Smartphone Battery Performance - FULL TEST RESULTS AND REVIEW ViserMark has put the Motorola Razr 60 through our testing protocol, based on real smartphone usage from 100% battery level down to power off. This includes daily activities, such as calls, web, video and music streaming, gaming, social networks, picture and video capture, and standby. All activities are executed in a defined order and timeline.   These test results, show how the Motorola Razr 60 performed and the scores achieved. 1. Battery Performance The Motorola Razr 60  achieved a battery performance score of 43/100, placing it nearly on par with both the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 6 (44) and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6 (44), while outperforming the flagship average (41.6). This result confirms that Motorola’s latest clamshell can confidently stand beside pricier foldables in overall endurance, offering well-balanced longevity despite its compact 4,500 mAh battery. Charging is handled through 30 W wired TurboPower and 15 W wireless support. Motorola’s advertised “half-charge in around 35 minutes” holds true in real testing, with a full recharge taking roughly 70–80 minutes. While not class-leading, the dual-charging convenience (wired and wireless) adds everyday practicality. There’s no reverse-charging function, which keeps it aligned with most mid-range foldables rather than premium flagships. Overall, the Razr 60  delivers dependable, well-tuned endurance with efficient standby consumption and balanced power draw. It won’t dethrone Samsung’s latest Flip in sheer optimisation, but it’s a strong showing that demonstrates Motorola’s progress in battery engineering, a foldable that performs consistently without demanding constant recharges. 2. Battery Life In ViserMark’s battery life testing, the Motorola Razr 60  achieved 41 hours of active usage, equivalent to roughly 1.5 days of typical real-world use. This places it slightly ahead of the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 6 (38 hours), nearly matching the Galaxy Z Fold 6   (43 hours), and comfortably above the flagship average (40.5 hours). For a compact clamshell foldable, this is a strong showing, proof that Motorola’s efficiency tuning and silicon-carbon battery chemistry pay off in everyday scenarios. The phone’s stamina stems from its 4,500 mAh cell paired with the MediaTek Dimensity 7400X chipset. While it handles light workloads like messaging, streaming, and browsing efficiently, power draw increases under heavier conditions such as gaming or extended camera use, consistent with most MediaTek foldables. Even so, the Razr 60 maintains dependable all-day performance without anxiety about mid-day top-ups. For most users, the Razr 60  easily covers a full day plus a comfortable buffer into the next, putting it on par with Samsung’s foldables and just shy of the best endurance performers in the premium category. While it doesn’t quite hit two-day territory, Motorola’s latest flip remains a reliable travel and daily companion with well-balanced battery management. 3.   Battery Consumption Based on ViserMark’s measured current consumption data, the Motorola Razr 60  demonstrates notably lower power draw across nearly all major usage categories compared with the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6 , reflecting stronger overall optimisation for everyday efficiency. The Razr 60 consumes roughly half the current of the Fold 6 during social media and outgoing call scenarios, suggesting Motorola’s firmware and display tuning are better calibrated for light, continuous workloads. Similar gains are seen in gaming, downloads/uploads, YouTube, Media Player and Web browsing where the Razr maintains nearly identical visual endurance despite a smaller internal battery. The only areas where the Galaxy Z Fold 6 performs more efficiently are camera usage and replay. These gaps suggest that Samsung’s image processing pipeline and multimedia handling are slightly better optimised for intensive visual tasks, possibly due to Qualcomm’s more mature power scaling under high-performance loads. Even so, across the broader test suite, the Razr 60 maintains a clear advantage in sustained, real-world efficiency, delivering competitive endurance despite its smaller battery capacity. When comparing the Motorola Razr 60  with the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 6 , the data reveals two premium clamshell foldables with similar design philosophies but subtly different energy profiles. Despite both featuring comparable battery capacities (4,500 mAh for the Razr 60 vs 4,000 mAh for the Flip 6 ), their optimisation approaches diverge noticeably. The Razr 60  demonstrates greater efficiency across most everyday scenarios, including social media, outgoing calls, gaming, downloads/uploads, media playback, and web browsing. These results show Motorola’s superior optimisation for continuous, screen-on workloads such as messaging, streaming, and casual gaming, where it consistently draws less power than Samsung’s Snapdragon-based Flip 6 . The Galaxy Z Flip 6 , on the other hand, proves more efficient in camera, YouTube, and replay tests. This demonstrates Samsung’s superior optimisation for image processing, video playback, and post-capture handling, where its Snapdragon hardware and software integration achieve lower power draw under visually intensive workloads. Overall, the Motorola Razr 60  stands out as the more energy-conscious foldable for everyday use — efficient across communication, browsing, and entertainment — and its slightly larger 4,500 mAh battery further extends its practical endurance. Meanwhile, the Galaxy Z Flip 6  remains better tuned for heavy content creation, offering leaner power use where performance and visual output take priority. When comparing battery efficiency across the Motorola Razr 60 , Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 6 , Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6 , and the Flagship/Pro Tier average, clear differences emerge in how each device manages power across real-world use cases. The Motorola Razr 60  demonstrates one of the most balanced and efficient profiles in its class. It consumes less power than both Samsung foldables in the majority of daily tasks — notably social media, outgoing calls, gaming, downloads/uploads, media playback, and web browsing — suggesting Motorola’s optimisation focuses on steady endurance and efficient handling of screen-on activities. By contrast, the Galaxy Z Flip 6  and Z Fold 6  show higher current draw, particularly in social media and outgoing calls, where their power-hungry Snapdragon chips contribute to steeper consumption peaks. The Fold 6 does perform better in camera, YouTube, and replay tasks, where Samsung’s integrated image pipeline and multimedia tuning deliver better energy management during heavy visual workloads. Compared to the Flagship/Pro Tier average, the Razr 60  sits comfortably competitive. Its results point to a refined software–hardware balance, achieving solid endurance despite its compact flip form factor. 4.   Battery Efficiency In ViserMark’s battery efficiency evaluation, the Motorola Razr 60  achieved a 1 leaf rating, placing it level with the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6  but below the Galaxy Z Flip 6 (1.5 leaves) and the flagship average of 0.98 leaves. This suggests that while the Razr 60 delivers strong endurance for its compact size, it isn’t among the most finely optimised foldables when it comes to power management. The result reflects a tuning strategy that prioritises consistent, real-world stability over aggressive energy saving. Motorola’s optimisation avoids erratic power draw or throttling under load, but it doesn’t match Samsung’s efficiency gains in sustained tasks such as gaming or video playback. Still, the Razr 60 balances performance and endurance well, offering reliable battery behaviour across daily workloads rather than chasing benchmark efficiency figures. 5.   Annual Energy Consumption According to ViserMark’s annual energy testing, the Motorola Razr 60  consumes approximately 3.6 kWh per year, placing it slightly above the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 6 (3.4 kWh) and Galaxy Z Fold 6 (3.3 kWh), yet still below the flagship average of 3.79 kWh. This positions the Razr 60 in the upper-middle range for foldable energy efficiency, solid, though not class-leading. This result underscores Motorola’s approach of prioritising balanced performance and steady endurance over extreme energy optimisation. The Razr 60 draws marginally more power than Samsung’s best-tuned foldables, but its consumption remains well-controlled considering the dual-display setup and compact form factor. For everyday users, this translates into a dependable all-day experience with only a modest sustainability trade-off. While the Razr 60 isn’t the most frugal clamshell on the market, it offers reliable efficiency and endurance harmony, proving that Motorola’s engineering choices strike a practical middle ground between power and performance. Who Should Buy the Motorola Razr 60 ? The Motorola Razr 60 is best suited for users who want the foldable experience without the flagship price tag. People who value design, practicality, and everyday performance more than sheer technical muscle. It’s a phone made for those who appreciate innovation in form, not just in specs, and who see the flip design as a lifestyle choice rather than a novelty. With its refined clamshell build, Pantone-certified finishes, and stainless-steel hinge, the Razr 60 appeals to design-conscious users who want something compact, stylish, and distinct from the sea of slab phones. It’s ideal for urban professionals, trendsetters, and casual tech enthusiasts who want a modern device that feels premium but isn’t over-engineered. The 6.9-inch LTPO AMOLED inner display and 3.6-inch cover screen make it practical in daily life, perfect for quick checks, navigation, selfies, or calls without unfolding. Meanwhile, the 4,500 mAh silicon–carbon battery offers reliable all-day use, easily lasting 1.5 days for moderate users, and the combination of 30W wired and 15W wireless charging ensures flexible top-ups at home or on the go. Performance from the MediaTek Dimensity 7400X and up to 12 GB RAM keeps things smooth for social apps, multitasking, and entertainment, while the clean Android 15 experience and Moto gestures (chop for flashlight, twist for camera) maintain Motorola’s signature simplicity. It’s also a strong fit for users who prefer a minimal, near-stock Android experience without bloatware or intrusive skins. That said, the Razr 60 isn’t built for everyone. Power users and heavy gamers may find its MediaTek chipset less capable under stress, and photographers looking for flagship-grade low-light performance or telephoto versatility will need to look higher up the range. Its software support window (three OS updates, four years of security patches) is shorter than Samsung’s, and there’s no expandable storage or headphone jack. In short, the Motorola Razr 60 is for people who want style, practicality, and personality in one foldable, a well-balanced daily driver that brings the flip form factor to a wider audience. It’s not for spec-chasers or hardcore users, but for anyone who values design elegance, functional innovation, and solid all-round performance, it’s one of the most appealing foldables in its class. ViserMark VERDICT The Motorola Razr 60 doesn’t chase flagship dominance, it focuses on delivering what most people actually want in a foldable: a stylish, practical design, smooth performance, and dependable battery life without the Ultra-tier price. Its clamshell build feels sturdy and premium, with Pantone-certified finishes, a reinforced stainless-steel hinge, and IP48 protection offering reassurance against everyday wear. The design strikes the right balance between playful and functional, giving the flip format genuine everyday usability. The 6.9-inch LTPO AMOLED inner screen is sharp, bright, and fluid at 120Hz, while the 3.6-inch external display makes quick replies, calls, and selfies effortless. Together, they make the Razr 60 practical beyond its nostalgic appeal. Performance from the Dimensity 7400X is smooth for daily tasks, social media, and multitasking, though it’s not a powerhouse, gaming and sustained workloads will reveal its limits. The 50 MP main camera with OIS and 13 MP ultra-wide deliver bright, accurate shots in good light, but night and zoom performance remain average. The 4,500 mAh battery is another highlight, easily lasting a day and a half of mixed use, with 30W wired and 15W wireless charging keeping it flexible. Motorola’s My UX on Android 15 remains clean, fast, and free of bloat, with signature gestures that make everyday use intuitive. The Razr 60 isn’t built for power users or camera enthusiasts, it’s for those who want style, simplicity, and practicality in a modern foldable. Confident, compact, and reliable, it proves that you don’t need an Ultra price tag to enjoy the flip experience done right. VCX (Valued Camera eXperience) The VCX Forum  has been working with its members on the system and infrastructure as a non-profit organisation. We strive to improve our technology to develop and exchange accurate and objective quality and performance indicators, which is our ultimate goal. We will also serve as a compass for the smartphone camera industry. We appreciate your interest in the VCX Forum. VCX Forum: No review Background Motorola  is a well-established and innovative technology company known for its contributions to the telecommunications industry. Founded in 1928, Motorola has a rich history of pioneering achievements, including the development of the first handheld mobile phone. Today, the company continues to produce a wide range of consumer electronics, with a focus on smartphones that offer reliable performance, innovative features, and value for money. Motorola's smartphones are known for their durability, user-friendly interfaces, and strong battery life, making them a popular choice for consumers worldwide. Written by Marcella Frattari   is the Communication Marketing and Lead Generation Manager at SmartViser, playing a key role in shaping the company's communication and marketing strategies. With a background in journalism and a passion for digital communication, Marcella focuses on improving SmartViser's overall online presence and engagement. Her dedication to clear, effective communication and creative content makes her a valuable asset to the team. Press Contact Marcella Frattari: Contact@visermark.com Our Resources ViserMark Scores ViserMark Reviews Success Stories Latest Articles Discover what ViserMark is all about. Read ViserMark's latest in-depth smartphone battery reviews. Discover our main success stories with Telecoms and other industries. Read more articles on our battery life, performance reviews, and test results. Know more Know more Know more Know more

SMARTPHONE TIER: MID TIER Battery Capacity mAh: 5000 Nothing Phone (3a): Efficient, Enduring, and Distinctly Different SMARTPHONE BATTERY PERFORMANCE Based on Price: Mid Tier (€200-€499) Mid  Tier Ranking # 3 Learn more: Quick Summary ViserMark Labels Specifications Know the Test Results ViserMark Verdict Video Review - Soon Available The Nothing Phone (3a) is a refreshingly distinctive mid-range smartphone that leans heavily on design and user experience, while still packing just enough performance and features to make it stand out in a very crowded segment. Positioned as the spiritual successor to the Phone (2a), the 3a doesn’t attempt to be revolutionary but instead smooths out the rough edges of its predecessor. With a brighter display, refined build quality, an additional telephoto camera, and a new approach to AI integration, the Phone (3a) feels like a thoughtful evolution that prioritises usability, aesthetics, and everyday dependability. The design remains the clearest differentiator. Nothing’s transparent philosophy continues here, now with a glass back instead of the polycarbonate panel found on the 2a. The look is cleaner, more premium, and less prone to smudges. The signature Glyph lighting has been simplified compared to the flagship line, but it still delivers a fun, futuristic aesthetic that doubles as functional notifications. At 201 grams and 8.3mm thick, the device feels substantial without being unwieldy, while the new IP64 rating provides added peace of mind against dust and splashes. The frame is still polycarbonate, but its matte finish offers both durability and grip, making the phone comfortable for daily use. Available in Black, White, and a bold Blue option, the Phone (3a) has more personality than the typical glass-slab mid-ranger. The display also receives meaningful upgrades. The 6.77-inch AMOLED panel retains its FHD+ resolution and 120Hz refresh rate, but brightness levels have been significantly boosted. With peaks of up to 3,000 nits (around 1,200 in realistic outdoor use), the 3a’s screen is far easier to view in direct sunlight compared to its predecessor. Colours remain punchy without being overdone, and the option to toggle between more saturated or natural profiles adds flexibility. While it lacks LTPO technology for fully dynamic refresh rate scaling, scrolling and animations are consistently smooth. HDR10+ support is present for streaming, though Dolby Vision is still missing. Overall, the display comfortably competes with and often outshines other phones in this price bracket. Performance comes via Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 chipset, paired with either 8GB or 12GB of RAM and up to 256GB of UFS 2.2 storage. This combination ensures a smooth experience in everyday scenarios such as messaging, browsing, and multitasking. Compared to the Dimensity 7200 in the Phone (2a), the Snapdragon chip doesn’t deliver dramatic raw performance gains, but it does bring better energy efficiency and steadier thermals under load. Gaming is acceptable for casual titles, though more demanding 3D games will require lowered settings to run smoothly. Still, for most users, the overall experience is fluid and responsive, with no glaring bottlenecks. Software remains one of Nothing’s biggest strengths. Running Android 15 with Nothing OS 3.1, the interface feels polished, cohesive, and refreshingly free of unnecessary bloat. The design language embraces bold typography, clean widgets, and subtle animations that give the phone a unique character compared to other Android skins. A key addition this year is the Essential Key, a new hardware button placed below the power button, which integrates directly with Essential Space, an AI-driven hub for captures, reminders, and quick notes. A single press takes a screenshot, a long press records a voice note (automatically transcribed), and a double-tap brings up stored items. While still a young feature set, it demonstrates Nothing’s intent to integrate AI into meaningful, practical tools rather than just flashy gimmicks. The company promises three years of OS updates and six years of security patches, solid, though shy of the seven-year support now offered by Google and Samsung. The camera system is where the Phone (3a) delivers its most noticeable hardware upgrade. It now features a triple-lens setup consisting of a 50MP main sensor with OIS, a new 50MP 2× telephoto lens with EIS, and an 8MP ultrawide. The main camera captures vibrant, detailed shots in good lighting with reliable dynamic range, though colours can skew slightly saturated. Low-light performance is aided by OIS, producing usable results but still introducing visible noise in darker areas. The telephoto lens is the star of the show, rare at this price point, providing natural portrait shots and usable zoom up to 4× in daylight. However, it struggles in low-light conditions where noise quickly creeps in. The ultrawide is serviceable for casual use but lags behind in sharpness and colour accuracy. On the video front, 4K/30fps is supported on the main sensor, with stabilisation improved compared to the 2a. The 32MP selfie camera also performs well, producing bright, detailed self-portraits in good light, though it softens details in dimmer scenarios. Battery life continues to impress. With a 5,000mAh cell, the Phone (3a) consistently achieves two days of mixed use, aided by the efficient Snapdragon 7s Gen 3. Independent testing shows around 56 hours of active use, putting it ahead of many rivals in the same tier. Charging is handled via 50W wired charging, bringing the phone to 50% in around 20 minutes and fully recharging in under an hour. Wireless charging is absent, reserved for Nothing’s flagship models; and, like most modern phones, no charger is included in the box. Still, endurance remains one of the 3a’s strongest assets, especially considering its efficiency rating places it among the best in its class. Audio is delivered through stereo speakers, with the earpiece doubling as a secondary driver. Output is loud, balanced enough for casual media, and slightly richer than on the 2a. Haptics are tight and responsive, complementing the Glyph interface’s playful design cues. An under-display fingerprint scanner provides fast and reliable biometric security, while connectivity is well-rounded with 5G, Wi-Fi 6, NFC, and Bluetooth 5.4 all onboard. Ultimately, the Nothing Phone (3a) succeeds by being a mid-range phone that doesn’t feel boring. It doesn’t chase raw specifications or unnecessary gimmicks, but instead refines the essentials with a brighter screen, more versatile cameras, and a software experience that feels carefully crafted. While compromises remain, notably the average ultrawide camera, lack of wireless charging, and shorter software support than its rivals, the Phone (3a) brings personality, design flair, and a sense of polish that few competitors in its segment can match. For users who value a distinctive smartphone that looks and feels different while still delivering dependable day-to-day performance, the Nothing Phone (3a) is a compelling and well-rounded choice. Pros Cons Distinctive transparent design with glass back and Glyph lighting Ultrawide 8MP camera is weak, especially in low light Sharp 6.77-inch AMOLED display with 120Hz refresh rate Telephoto performance drops significantly in dim conditions Peak brightness up to 3,000 nits for strong outdoor visibility No wireless charging (reserved for flagships) 50MP 2× telephoto camera — rare at this price point UFS 2.2 storage instead of faster UFS 3.1/4.0 Solid 5,000mAh battery with reliable 2-day endurance AI features in Essential Space feel basic and unfinished Smooth daily performance with Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 Display lacks LTPO tech and Dolby Vision support Clean, bloat-free Nothing OS 3.1 on Android 15 Software support lags behind Google and Samsung’s 7-year updates Practical Essential Key + Essential Space AI integration Stereo speakers and responsive under-display fingerprint scanner Promised 3 years of OS updates and 6 years of security patches   ViserMark Labels for the Nothing Phone (3a) Please take a look at the following information about the battery performance of the Nothing Phone (3a) : Battery Life: The Nothing Phone (3a) stands out in the mid-range space with an endurance of around 56 hours of active use, which translates to a solid two days of real-world use for most people. Whether you’re streaming, scrolling through social media, navigating with GPS, or mixing in some gaming, the 5,000mAh cell holds up well. The Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 chipset, paired with Nothing’s clean OS, ensures efficient power distribution without big spikes in drain. In short, it’s the kind of phone you don’t have to babysit with a charger every night. Battery Charging: On paper, the Nothing Phone (3a) supports 50W wired charging (USB PD 3.0), with claims of a full charge in under an hour. In testing, a full charge took around 1 hour and 50 minutes using a compatible fast charger. This makes it fine for overnight charging or planned top-ups but far from the rapid charging speeds offered by some rivals. Adding to that, Nothing doesn’t include a charger in the box, so buyers will need to source their own to take advantage of the maximum charging rate. Battery Performance & Efficiency: Independent testing puts the Phone (3a)’s annual energy consumption at just 2.9 kWh, matching some of the most efficient mid-range devices available. Its 1.5 “leaves” efficiency rating highlights how well-optimised the balance is between power draw and performance. In daily use, this translates to dependable, consistent stamina, even if you’re leaning on the brighter display outdoors or dipping into camera-heavy usage, the battery rarely shows sudden drops. For users who prioritise long-lasting, efficient power, the Nothing Phone (3a) delivers one of the best-rounded experiences in its class. Specification Overview  - Released Date: March 2025 Body & Build: Dimensions: 163.52 × 77.5 × 8.35 mm Weight: 201 g Materials: Glass back, plastic frame Durability: IP64 (dust-tight and splash-resistant) Display: Size: 6.77-inch AMOLED Resolution: 2392 × 1080, ~388 ppi, 20:9 Refresh Rate: 120Hz (non-adaptive) Brightness: 3000 nits peak, real-world ~1200 nits at 20% APL HDR Support: HDR10+ supported Protection: Panda Glass Operating System: OS: Android 15 with Nothing OS 3.1 Software Support: Up to 3 major Android upgrades (brand policy) Chipset & Performance: Processor: Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 (4 nm)  CPU: Octa-core (1×2.5 GHz Cortex-A720 + 3×2.4 GHz Cortex-A720 + 4×1.8 GHz Cortex-A520) GPU: Adreno 710 Memory & Storage: Configurations: 8 GB / 128 GB, 12 GB / 256 GB Expandable: No microSD slot Connectivity & Features: SIM: Dual Nano-SIM 5G: Supported (Sub-6 GHz) Wi-Fi: Wi-Fi 6, dual-band Bluetooth: 5.4 NFC: Supported (region-dependent) USB: Type-C Biometrics: Optical in-display fingerprint sensor Sensors: Accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass Audio: Speakers: Stereo speakers (phones use earpiece + bottom-fired) Headphone Jack: None Camera System: Rear Cameras: 50 MP main (f/1.9, 1/1.57", OIS) 50 MP 2× telephoto (f/2.0) 8 MP ultrawide (f/2.2) Front Camera: 32 MP (f/2.2) Video Recording: Rear up to 4K@30fps, front 1080p@30fps Colours Available: White and Black. Performance - HOW WE TEST ViserMark  offers a comprehensive range of battery performance test results based on different criteria and benchmarks for evaluating a smartphone's performance. Our tests are performed using the strictest protocol in a controlled environment to ensure repetition and consistency powered by SmartViser's test auto mation solution viSer . Translating technical specifications into consumer benefits with SmartViser VWS Analytics Studio  is a complementary product to the viSer Test Automation solution. It enhances the viSer user experience and is the fastest way to analyse and view smartphone test results. We have used the interactive dashboard to show you the recent test results and translated them into ViserMark Labels. Join our readers to receive the latest update to our smartphone battery performance scores and performance reviews as soon as we finish testing! Smartphone Battery Performance - FULL TEST RESULTS AND REVIEW ViserMark has put the Nothing Phone (3a) through our testing protocol, based on real smartphone usage from 100% battery level down to power off. This includes daily activities, such as calls, web, video and music streaming, gaming, social networks, picture and video capture, and standby. All activities are executed in a defined order and timeline.   These test results, show how the Nothing Phone (3a) performed and the scores achieved. 1. Battery Performance The Nothing Phone (3a)  achieved a battery performance score of 51/100, putting it on par with the CMF Phone 2 Pro (50) and comfortably above the mid-tier average of 44.52. While the difference between the 3a and CMF 2 Pro is marginal, both devices rank among the more efficient mid-range smartphones available. By contrast, the Sony Xperia 10 V 5G trails significantly behind at 28, underscoring the 3a’s stronger optimisation and real-world reliability. Charging is handled via 50W wired power delivery (USB PD 3.0), with Nothing advertising a full charge in under an hour. In testing, however, a complete refill took closer to 1 hour and 50 minutes with a compatible fast charger, making it adequate but not class-leading. As expected, no charger is included in the box, which may frustrate some buyers who prefer a complete setup out of the gate. There’s also no support for wireless or reverse charging, keeping the 3a aligned with typical mid-range compromises. Overall, the Nothing Phone (3a) combines dependable two-day stamina with measured efficiency, making it a compelling choice for users who value endurance without sacrificing day-to-day responsiveness. While charging speeds could be sharper, its overall energy-to-performance optimisation ensures it holds its ground as one of the stronger mid-range options in 2025. 2. Battery Life In ViserMark’s battery life testing, the Nothing Phone (3a) achieved 56 hours of active usage, translating to about two full days of typical use. This result positions it among the best in the mid-range category, essentially on par with the CMF Phone 2 Pro (55 hours) and comfortably ahead of the mid-tier average of around 46 hours. By contrast, devices such as the Sony Xperia 10 V 5G (33 hours) fall well short, highlighting the 3a’s efficient optimisation. This performance reflects the strong integration of the Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 chipset with Nothing OS 3.2, which together deliver not only smooth task handling but also effective background power management. The result is consistent stamina that holds up well across varied usage patterns, from streaming and browsing to gaming and camera work. For users who prioritise reliable day-to-day endurance, the Nothing Phone (3a) provides genuine peace of mind, easily lasting through demanding schedules without forcing mid-day top-ups. Its robust battery life makes it one of the most practical mid-range smartphones currently available. 3.   Battery Consumption The Nothing Phone (3a)  generally consumes more power than the Sony Xperia 10 V 5G  in categories such as social media, outgoing calls, YouTube, and camera use, indicating a heavier energy demand during communication and media-heavy tasks. This suggests the 3a isn’t always the most finely tuned for prolonged screen-on or network-intensive sessions. Interestingly, in gaming, the Nothing Phone (3a) is the more efficient device, drawing less current than the Xperia. This may point to better optimisation in GPU load handling and thermal management under sustained graphical stress. For downloads/uploads, web browsing, and media playback, the two phones remain closely matched, with only small differences that are unlikely to translate into major real-world endurance gaps. Despite identical 5,000 mAh batteries, the 3a ultimately delivers longer overall stamina in ViserMark’s testing, reflecting more effective system-level optimisation rather than sheer capacity. When comparing the Nothing Phone (3a)  with the Nothing CMF Phone 2 Pro , the data highlights how two devices from the same brand, both positioned in the mid-tier and packing 5,000mAh batteries, can deliver noticeably different efficiency profiles. The CMF Phone 2 Pro   shows higher power consumption in areas like social media, outgoing calls, downloads/uploads, web browsing, media playback, and gaming, which suggests its tuning prioritises responsiveness and raw activity handling, even at the cost of endurance. By contrast, the Nothing Phone (3a) is more frugal across these categories, giving it a clear advantage for users who spend much of their time online, messaging, or multitasking throughout the day. By contrast, the Nothing Phone (3a)  proves more efficient across those same categories, giving it the advantage for users who spend much of their time online, streaming music, or multitasking. However, the balance shifts with camera use and YouTube, where the Phone (3a) consumes more power than the CMF Phone 2 Pro, highlighting areas where Nothing’s mid-tier refinement could still improve. The Nothing Phone (3a) is more efficient than the CMF Phone 2 Pro in most day-to-day tasks, though heavier drain appears in camera and YouTube use. Overall, it’s a dependable all-rounder for battery life, offering reliable stamina for everyday users. When comparing battery efficiency across the Nothing Phone (3a) , Nothing CMF Phone 2 Pro , Sony Xperia 10 V 5G , and the mid-tier average, clear differences emerge in how each device manages power across real-world tasks. The Nothing Phone (3a) is generally efficient across most categories but stands out for its higher drain in camera use and YouTube, where it consumes more than both the Sony and the CMF. The Sony Xperia 10 V 5G is the weakest in gaming and media playback, where it draws more current than rivals despite having the same 5,000mAh battery. This explains why its real-world endurance lags behind. The Nothing CMF Phone 2 Pro consumes more overall than the other two devices across most daily tasks. Its only relative advantages come in camera use (less drain than both the 3a and Xperia) and YouTube (less drain than the 3a, though still higher than mid-tier averages). Among the three, the Nothing Phone (3a)  is the most balanced day-to-day performer, efficient in most workloads but held back by heavier drain in camera and video streaming. The Sony Xperia 10 V 5G  struggles in gaming and media playback, while the CMF Phone 2 Pro  is the most power-hungry overall, only showing restraint in camera and YouTube use. 4.   Battery Efficiency In ViserMark’s battery efficiency evaluation, the Nothing Phone (3a)  achieved a 1.5-leaf rating, matching the Nothing CMF Phone 2 Pro  at the top of the mid-tier bracket and standing clearly above the category average of 1.09 leaves. In contrast, the Sony Xperia 10 V 5G  trailed far behind at just 0.5 leaves, underlining its weaker optimisation despite identical battery capacity. The Phone (3a) ’s strong score reflects well-balanced hardware–software tuning, with Nothing OS and the Dimensity 7-series platform working together to reduce unnecessary drain. This efficiency allows the device to deliver dependable endurance without relying solely on raw battery size. Unlike rivals that compensate for poor optimisation with aggressive standby savings or oversized batteries, the Nothing Phone (3a)  demonstrates genuine consistency in its power management. It ensures smooth performance and reliable battery life, positioning it as one of the most efficient mid-range devices available in 2025. 5.   Annual Energy Consumption According to ViserMark’s annual energy testing, the Nothing Phone (3a)  records an impressively low consumption of just 2.9 kWh per year, placing it among the most efficient smartphones in its class. It matches the Nothing CMF Phone 2 Pro  and sits well below the mid-tier average of 3.59 kWh, while the Sony Xperia 10 V 5G  consumes significantly more at 4.9 kWh annually. This result underscores the Phone (3a) ’s well-optimised hardware–software balance, ensuring that power is used effectively whether during active use or in standby. By keeping unnecessary drain to a minimum, it delivers both consistent endurance and reduced long-term energy costs. For users conscious of efficiency and sustainability, the Nothing Phone (3a)  not only ensures dependable day-to-day battery life but also represents a more environmentally considerate choice in the mid-range segment. Who Should Buy the Nothing Phone (3a) ? The Nothing Phone (3a)  is a strong pick for users who want a mid-range smartphone that combines distinctive design, dependable performance, and excellent battery life without feeling generic. It’s especially appealing for those who value clean software and long-lasting endurance over raw specs or gimmicks. With its transparent glass back, Glyph lighting, and refined build, the Phone (3a) stands out in a crowded segment as one of the few mid-rangers with a true design identity. Its brighter AMOLED display, two-day battery stamina, and balanced Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 performance make it a reliable daily driver for students, professionals, and casual users alike. The addition of a 50MP telephoto camera, rare at this price point, makes it a solid choice for anyone who enjoys portrait photography or wants more versatility than the standard main + ultrawide combo. Combined with Nothing OS 3.1’s clean, bloat-free interface and the new Essential Key + AI integration, the Phone (3a) also appeals to those looking for a polished, fuss-free software experience. However, it may not fully satisfy heavy gamers or camera purists, as demanding 3D titles require lowered settings and the ultrawide camera remains weak compared to rivals. The lack of wireless charging and only three years of OS updates also limit its future-proofing compared to longer-supported alternatives. In short, the Nothing Phone (3a) is for users who want a stylish, efficient, and dependable mid-range phone that looks and feels different, delivers reliable two-day stamina, and offers just enough extra features, like telephoto zoom and a brighter display, to keep it from blending into the crowd. ViserMark VERDICT Using the Nothing Phone (3a)  is a reminder that mid-range smartphones don’t have to be bland or forgettable. From its transparent glass back and Glyph lighting to its refined build, it offers personality alongside practicality. The 6.77-inch AMOLED display is a highlight, with excellent brightness for outdoor use and a fluid 120Hz refresh rate that makes navigation smooth and enjoyable. Paired with Nothing OS 3.1 on Android 15, the experience feels clean, bloat-free, and polished, striking a balance between minimalism and everyday usability. Battery life is a standout strength. The 5,000mAh cell consistently delivers around two days of real-world use, with ViserMark measuring 56 hours of active usage. While charging is capped at 50W wired, real-world testing showed it takes closer to 1h 50m for a full refill, which is adequate but less impressive than rivals that genuinely hit faster speeds. As expected, no charger is included in the box. Performance, powered by the Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, is more than sufficient for daily tasks like social media, browsing, messaging, and multitasking. It’s not a powerhouse for heavy gaming, but for most users, it runs smoothly without significant slowdowns. The addition of a 50MP telephoto lens is a rare mid-range perk, giving users more flexibility in photography, even if the ultrawide remains a weak point. Overall, the Nothing Phone (3a)  succeeds in delivering a dependable, efficient, and stylish daily driver. It doesn’t overpromise or chase gimmicks but instead focuses on solid fundamentals, excellent endurance, a bright display, clean software, and unique design, making it one of the most balanced and enjoyable mid-range smartphones of 2025. VCX (Valued Camera eXperience) The VCX Forum  has been working with its members on the system and infrastructure as a non-profit organisation. We strive to improve our technology to develop and exchange accurate and objective quality and performance indicators, which is our ultimate goal. We will also serve as a compass for the smartphone camera industry. We appreciate your interest in the VCX Forum. VCX Forum: No review Background Founded in October 2020 by Carl Pei, co‑founder of OnePlus, Nothing Technology Limited  (stylised as NOTHING ) is a   London ‑based consumer electronics company with a mission: to make technology “fun again” through distinctive design, transparent aesthetics, and clean software experiences. In August 2023, Nothing introduced the CMF by Nothing sub‑brand (CMF stands for Color, Material, Finish ) to broaden its accessible design-led product lineup. This brand is behind the CMF Phone 1, CMF Watch Pro, and eventually the CMF Phone 2 Pro, launched in April 2025 as an entry‑level smartphone with premium styling and long‑term software support. Written by Marcella Frattari   is the Communication Marketing and Lead Generation Manager at SmartViser, playing a key role in shaping the company's communication and marketing strategies. With a background in journalism and a passion for digital communication, Marcella focuses on improving SmartViser's overall online presence and engagement. Her dedication to clear, effective communication and creative content makes her a valuable asset to the team. Press Contact Marcella Frattari: Contact@visermark.com Our Resources ViserMark Scores ViserMark Reviews Success Stories Latest Articles Discover what ViserMark is all about. Read ViserMark's latest in-depth smartphone battery reviews. Discover our main success stories with Telecoms and other industries. Read more articles on our battery life, performance reviews, and test results. Know more Know more Know more Know more

If you’ve ever felt your phone getting warmer than your morning coffee during a summer day, you’re not imagining things. You’re streaming video or gaming on a new 5G smartphone, and before long the device feels uncomfortably warm. In the early days of 5G, some phones had warning high-temperature messages or shut down within minutes of heavy use on a 5G network. Fast-forward to 2025, and both networks and devices have evolved. Are today’s 5G handsets finally cooling down, or is the heat here to stay?  5G and Overheating: Why Your Phone Runs Hot When 5G first rolled out, overheating became a real headache for smartphone makers and users alike. The technical leap from 4G to 5G came with trade-offs, notably, higher power draw. Early 5G modems and antennas demanded much more energy to deliver super-fast speeds, and that energy turned into heat inside the phone. Unlike 4G, 5G uses techniques like massive MIMO (multiple antennas) and beamforming to maintain a strong signal, especially at higher frequencies. Those extra antennas and processing workloads meant phones could heat up fast. In fact, one report in 2019 found Qualcomm’s first-gen 5G phones would hit thermal shutdown after just a few minutes in warm weather, dropping back to 4G to save themselves. In other words, 5G’s blazing speeds were literally too hot to handle for those first devices. By 2020-2022, the issue was prominent enough that SmartViser decided to investigate. SmartViser’s original 2022 study, tellingly titled “ Can They Handle the Heat of 5G? ” , pu t some first-wave 5G smartphones through their paces in a controlled lab. The findings were eye-opening: even in a cool 16 °C air-conditioned lab with solid 5G coverage, several phones overheated in under 20 minutes of continuous 5G data transfer. The devices generally fell into three groups: Group 1:  Some phones stayed stable , no overheating at all, maintaining performance as normal. Group 2:  Others hit around 48 °C within 20 minutes , triggering on-screen overheating warnings and noticeable slowdowns. Group 3:  The rest actually throttled performance or dropped from 5G to 4G  to cool off. These phones overheated at about the 20-minute mark and automatically took drastic measures, like closing background apps and switching down to 4G , in order to protect themselves. This 2022 snapshot confirmed that 5G could worsen overheating compared to 4G. It wasn’t unique to 5G, any heavy task can warm a phone, but the mix of high data speeds, new radio tech, and immature thermal designs made it a “perfect storm.” Progress Since 2022: Better Networks, Smarter Chips The good news is that 2025’s 5G landscape looks very different from those early days. On the network side, 5G itself has matured. Carriers worldwide have expanded mid-band 5G coverage, providing consistently fast speeds without relying solely on the ultra-high-frequency mmWave signals that stressed phones out. In fact, mid-band 5G in 2025 delivers hundreds of Mbps in real-world average speeds (e.g. ~270–380 Mbps across much of Europe) with far more consistent connections than early deployments. This steadier coverage means phones no longer have to constantly hunt for signal or push their transmitters to the limit, which can indirectly cut heat. Still, faster networks let devices pull huge amounts of data, and processing it all can keep thermals high. On the hardware side, today’s 5G phones are built with heat control in mind. Flagship chipsets on 5nm or 4nm processes waste less energy as heat, while upgraded cooling designs, vapor chambers, heat pipes, graphene composite sheets, larger aluminium frames, spread and dissipate heat more effectively than older solutions. These changes let devices sustain performance for longer, with some models even enlarging vapor chambers year-over-year to handle prolonged loads. Software has caught up too: Android and iOS now coordinate closely with chipsets and thermal sensors, throttling heavy tasks, shifting workloads to cooler cores, or moderating modem use before temperatures spike. In 2025, consistent overheating on 5G is treated as a design flaw, and even many mid-range phones now benefit from scaled-down versions of flagship cooling tech. What Our 2025 Tests Revealed SmartViser’s latest 2025 study , using viSer automation tools , shows a clear leap forward since 2022. Back then, overheating shutdowns or abrupt drops to 4G were common; now, most devices employ layered, adaptive thermal controls thanks to closer integration between chipset, OS, and thermal management algorithms. Overheating failures are now rare, but not gone. A few models, generally budget or mid-tier phones with less advanced cooling, still triggered high-temperature warnings that temporarily limited user interaction. In extreme scenarios, even flagship devices can hit thermal ceilings, but they typically manage heat invisibly to the user before it gets that far. In a one-hour web browsing test, our 2025 device stayed on 5G for 98% of the session, maintained fast and stable page loading, and avoided CPU slowdowns. As heat built up, it selectively reduced power on certain uplink and mid-band 5G frequencies to lower RF load, preventing temperature spikes without impacting the experience. SmartViser Analytics Studio PS RAT Graph and Battery Temperature SmartViser Analytics Studio Web Browsing Loading Time and CPU Frequencies Three-hour 5G gaming sessions pushed every device to eventually fall back to 4G, with peak temperatures between 40°C and 48°C depending on cooling design and chipset efficiency. Flagships generally ran cooler, but all models used similar strategies: multi-step CPU/GPU throttling, seamless network fallback, and background process culling. The result was smoother gameplay under stress, with fewer abrupt drops in performance compared to earlier 5G generations. SmartViser Analytics Studio PS RAT and temperature graph Sustained, high-volume 5G downloads pushed some devices to their limits in as little as 26 minutes, triggering overheat warnings, and in a few severe cases, shutdowns above 50°C. Most phones, including flagships, avoided failure through progressive throttling and 4G fallback, but these edge cases prove that any smartphone can be pushed past its thermal safety margins. SmartViser Analytics Studio CPU Frequency and Throughput DL Graph SmartViser Analytics Studio Battery Temperature and Throughput upload graph Everyday 5G use, browsing, streaming, social media, is now largely free of the overheating drama seen in early 5G devices. Budget and mid-tier phones remain more likely to show visible heat warnings, but layered mitigation means most users will never see them. Under extreme loads, however, even the best cooling can only delay the inevitable, physics still applies. Keeping Your 5G Phone Cool in 2025 Modern smartphones are far better at managing heat, but you can still help, especially during heavy use: Watch the environment:  Avoid direct sunlight or leaving your phone on heat-absorbing surfaces. Even advanced cooling struggles in 35°C+ ambient temps. Pace your sessions:  Long gaming, streaming, or tethering? Take short breaks and, if possible, lower graphics settings or frame rates. Limit background load:  Close unused apps, disable radios you don’t need, and pause big downloads until you’re done with demanding tasks. Case check:  Remove thick or insulating cases during intense use to let heat escape. Avoid 5G + fast charging:  Charge first or slow-charge if you need to stay on 5G for heavy work. Use built-in tools:  Battery saver, performance modes, or gaming cooling settings can all reduce heat. Keep your software updated for the latest thermal tweaks. In everyday 5G use, you won’t need to think about cooling, but for long, high-load sessions, these small adjustments can keep your phone comfortable and performance steady. The Road Ahead: Cooling the Future of 5G Looking ahead, keeping phones cool remains a moving target. The next wave of connectivity, 5G-Advanced, promises higher speeds, new frequencies, and more complex use cases. Extended reality (XR), AI-heavy apps, and cloud gaming will push devices harder than ever. Imagine AR glasses tethered to a phone or a constant high-resolution game stream that also tracks real-time inputs, both scenarios tax the modem and processors as much as our toughest stress tests. Performance gains will only matter if paired with equally advanced cooling and power management. The progress since early 5G days is remarkable: phones that once throttled within minutes can now sustain hours of heavy use thanks to smarter thermal controls. Emerging solutions, ultrathin vapor chambers, graphene pads, even miniature fans, are edging closer to mainstream. More efficient chips and network load balancing will further reduce heat without sacrificing speed. For buyers, this means cautious optimism. A well-designed 2025 phone can handle everyday 5G without issue. But as devices take on ambitious roles, mixed-reality headsets, real-time 4K streaming, competitive mobile gaming, thermal engineering remains a core design challenge. The best models we tested struck an impressive balance between performance, battery life, and safety. In short, overheating has shifted from a widespread problem to a managed risk. Your 2025 handset won’t spontaneously shut down under normal conditions, it’s actively working to prevent that. Physics still applies: high speeds in small enclosures generate heat. Users can help by avoiding extreme scenarios, while manufacturers keep innovating in cooling. So the next time you fire up a demanding game or kick off a massive 5G download, your phone should handle it just fine, as long as you don’t decide to sunbathe it on a beach towel. Written By: Marcella Frattari  is the Digital Communications Manager at SmartViser, primarily responsible for ViserMark content creation and social media management. She holds a journalism background and is pursuing a master's degree in digital communications and marketing. Marcella brings a dynamic and creative approach to her work, consistently striving to enhance the company's online presence and engagement. Press Contact Marcella Frattari: Contact@visermark.com   Never miss out on our FREE Smartphone Reviews. Add  your email below to sign up for  our monthly newsletter ,   which provides all the latest mobile phones that ViserMark has tried  and tested. No pressure; you can unsubscribe anytime,  and we promise not to fill up your inbox.

Android 15 and Android 16 are two back-to-back releases of Google’s mobile OS, internally codenamed “Vanilla Ice Cream” and “Baklava” respectively. Each new Android version brings a bunch of features, tweaks, and optimizations. But you might wonder: will upgrading actually change my day-to-day experience? Introduction: Same Phone, New OS When you update your phone from Android 15 to Android 16, you’re essentially getting a software makeover. Google often adds visual polish, new functions, and security enhancements with each version. To find out how these changes affect real usage, SmartViser tested both Android 15 and Android 16 on the Google Pixel 8a  under identical conditions. Automatic brightness and battery savers were off, volumes were set equal, and the phone was put through the same tasks on each OS. This way, any differences we observe (in speed, battery life, etc.) can be attributed to the operating system itself and not some random factor. Before diving into numbers, let’s first look at what new features Android 16 brings to the table compared to Android 15, and how those might matter to you as an end user. New Features and Changes in Android 16 vs Android 15 Android 16 builds on the foundation of Android 15 with a more polished look, smoother animations, and subtle effects like blurred menus and richer color theming. While Android 15 refined the Material You design, Android 16’s new Material 3 Expressive UI makes the interface feel livelier and more dynamic; without any performance or battery cost. It’s not a radical redesign, but the small visual tweaks and fluid interactions make the system feel more modern and engaging. Notifications also get smarter. Android 15 introduced a cooldown system to prevent apps from spamming you, but Android 16 takes it further with Live Updates and better organization. Now you can see real-time progress for deliveries, rides, or downloads directly in your notification shade, while alerts are grouped more cleanly by app. The result is less clutter and more useful information at a glance, making everyday phone use smoother and less distracting. For multitasking and media, Android 15 brought split-screen shortcuts and partial screen sharing, but Android 16 takes a big leap with an early desktop-style mode on tablets and foldables. Apps are now forced to adapt to larger screens, so fewer will look like stretched phone apps. Media also gets a boost with HDR screenshots, a unified photo picker with cloud integration, and support for pro-level video formats. On top of that, Android 16 doubles down on security with features like Advanced Protection, USB port blocking, and Offline Lock, while also adding battery health monitoring. Together, these changes make Android 16 a safer, more flexible, and more user-friendly upgrade. Performance and Under-the-Hood Changes Adaptive Scheduling:  Android 16 comes with improved task scheduling and performance optimizations under the hood. This means the system is a bit smarter about managing CPU and background processes, which can lead to more efficient performance and possibly better battery usage for the same tasks. These changes aren’t really visible, but you might notice things like slightly smoother multitasking or marginally faster app launch times in some cases. ART and Archiving:  Android 15 had introduced an updated Android Runtime (ART) with performance tweaks and an app archiving feature. App archiving allows unused apps to be partially “cached” to free up space without uninstalling them completely. Both Android 15 and 16 support this, but Android 16 enforces some of these behaviors more strictly to maintain device efficiency over time. Developer Features:  For completeness, Android 16 also adds some developer-oriented features that indirectly benefit users. For example, predictive back gestures (which Android 15 started) are expanded in 16 to even work with traditional 3-button navigation, giving a preview of the screen you’ll go back to. This can help prevent accidental app exits. There’s also better support for Ultra-Wideband (UWB) and device ranging APIs in Android 16, which could mean more precise tracking for smart tags and such in the future. These aren’t things you’ll notice immediately, but they pave the way for smarter apps and accessories. Real-World Performance Comparison Before jumping into the results, we first leveled the playing field. Both Android 15 and 16 were tested on the same device with voice call volume set to 5, brightness fixed at 11 (no auto-brightness), and music volume at 6. Keeping these parameters identical ensures that any differences in battery life, gaming, browsing, or streaming are due to the operating system itself, not the setup. Web Browsing Speed We loaded a variety of popular websites and measured how quickly the pages became interactively ready (i.e., usable). The difference was negligible: Android 15 averaged ~492 ms per page, while Android 16 averaged ~484 ms. In other words, both versions load pages in roughly half a second on average. The fastest loads on Android 16 were a hair quicker (70 ms vs 80 ms for the very light pages), which suggests some minor improvements in the web rendering engine. However, Android 16 also showed slightly higher worst-case times on a couple pages (a spike up to ~4.3 seconds vs ~4.1 seconds on 15). These occasional slow loads are likely due to network variability rather than the OS itself. In normal web browsing, you won’t notice a difference between Android 15 and 16. Both are snappy and virtually identical in loading speed, with Android 16 perhaps fractionally more consistent. Scrolling and interactions in the browser felt smooth on both, and our data confirms the experience is the same to a human eye. Mobile Data Download/Upload Using a controlled server, we tested HTTP downloads and uploads to see if the network throughput changed. Android 15 showed a slight edge in raw speed, averaging about 46.9 Mbps download and 22.4 Mbps upload, versus 42.9 Mbps download and 21.6 Mbps upload on Android 16. That’s a difference of only a few Mbps, which in real usage (streaming videos, downloading apps, etc.) is barely noticeable — it’s within normal variance. It’s possible that Android 16’s network stack or background tasks used a bit of bandwidth during our test runs, but in everyday scenarios, both versions will feel the same for things like watching YouTube or uploading photos. A download that takes 10 seconds on Android 15 might take about 11 seconds on Android 16 in the absolute worst case given these averages – not exactly a dramatic gap. Most users wouldn’t notice any change in network speed after upgrading. Battery Performance To mimic a normal day, we ran the phones through a mix of gaming, browsing, streaming, file transfers, and standby. Both Android 15 and 16 lasted just over 17 hours and 13 minutes, essentially identical. Power-hungry tasks like gaming drained the most (around -1350 mA on both), while lighter activities such as browsing or streaming showed no real difference. Temperatures stayed steady too, averaging 25.9°C on Android 15 and 26.2°C on Android 16, a negligible gap. In short, upgrading won’t give you extra hours of battery life, but it also won’t take any away. Gaming and Graphics Performance For mobile gamers, even a slight drop or improvement in frame rates is noticeable. We ran a GPU-intensive WebGL game test on both OS versions to measure frames per second (FPS): Android 15: averaged about 52 FPS, with dips to a minimum of 42 FPS in the most intense scenes. Android 16: averaged around 48 FPS, with dips down to 35 FPS at worst. Peak framerates were similar (around 60+ FPS on both, since the device likely caps around 60Hz). However, the lowest  FPS on Android 16 went a bit lower than on 15. In plain terms, Android 15 was roughly 4 frames ahead on average, and handled the stress test slightly more smoothly when the going got tough. This suggests that Android 16’s graphics pipeline might not yet be fully optimized for demanding games, or perhaps some background process in 16 consumed resources during the test. The difference isn’t huge – a casual gamer probably wouldn’t perceive that their game that ran at 52 FPS on Android 15 is now 48 FPS on Android 16. Both are still smooth. But a keen eye might notice a few more minor frame drops on Android 16 in heavy gameplay scenarios. It’s something that could be addressed in future updates (as Google refines drivers and scheduling in Android 16). For most users playing typical mobile games, the experience remains virtually the same. Candy Crush, Subway Surfers, or PUBG Mobile will perform as they did before. Only at the very edge (or perhaps in benchmarks/VR apps) does Android 15 currently hold a slight performance edge. If you are an avid gamer pushing the device to its limits, you might  prefer the marginal stability of Android 15’s FPS. But keep in mind, Android 16 is likely to get updates that improve this, and the trade-off is you’d be missing out on new features in the meantime. Video Streaming and Playback We also tested streaming a high-quality video to see if either OS struggles with network or decoding for media. Both Android 15 and 16 achieved nearly 100% streaming efficiency in our test. This metric basically means the video played back smoothly without buffering or stuttering, maintaining ~99.8-99.9% optimal data throughput. Android 15 had an average of 99.9% stream consistency, and Android 16 was at 99.8%, with both never dropping below 99.7% during the playback. In short, no difference whatsoever. If you upgrade, your Netflix, YouTube, or Twitch streams will play just as flawlessly as before. Android 16 didn’t introduce any hiccups in how media is streamed or rendered. Both OS versions handle video streaming effortlessly on a decent connection, so you can enjoy your shows without worry about the update affecting it. Conclusion Think of Android 16 as a nice upgrade rather than a total makeover. Your phone will feel just as fast and your battery will last just as long as on Android 15, so you’re not losing anything. What you do  get are smarter notifications that keep you updated in real time, a fresher look with smoother animations, handy little perks like easier photo sharing and audio streaming, plus stronger security to keep your data safe. Unless you’re a hardcore gamer chasing every last frame per second, Android 16 is a no-brainer: it makes your phone feel a bit nicer, safer, and more useful without any downsides. Written By: Marcella Frattari  is the Digital Communications Manager at SmartViser, primarily responsible for ViserMark content creation and social media management. She holds a journalism background and is pursuing a master's degree in digital communications and marketing. Marcella brings a dynamic and creative approach to her work, consistently striving to enhance the company's online presence and engagement. Press Contact Marcella Frattari: Contact@visermark.com   Never miss out on our FREE Smartphone Reviews. Add  your email below to sign up for  our monthly newsletter ,   which provides all the latest mobile phones that ViserMark has tried  and tested. No pressure; you can unsubscribe anytime,  and we promise not to fill up your inbox.

SMARTPHONE TIER: MID TIER Battery Capacity mAh: 5000 Nothing CMF Phone 2 Pro: Nothing Beats a CMF Phone 2 Pro for Budget Efficiency SMARTPHONE BATTERY PERFORMANCE Based on Price: Mid Tier (€200-€499) Mid  Tier Ranking # 3 Learn more: Quick Summary ViserMark Labels Specifications Know the Test Results ViserMark Verdict Video Review - Soon Available The CMF Phone 2 Pro is a bold and refreshingly unique mid-range smartphone that blends striking design with practical performance, a large battery, and a surprisingly generous storage configuration. Positioned as Nothing’s budget-friendly alternative, this device makes a strong case for itself in a saturated segment by offering a clean software experience, playful aesthetics, and enough everyday reliability to satisfy users who prioritise value and simplicity over premium hardware. The handset immediately stands out thanks to its modular-inspired design. Although not truly modular in a traditional sense, the phone’s back panel can be swapped to accommodate various magnetic accessories, such as a wallet, kickstand, or lanyard, giving it a sense of personalisation not commonly found in this price range. The build quality feels solid, with a flat frame and textured rear that provides decent grip. It measures 8.1 millimetres in thickness and weighs 185 grams, which gives it a reassuring presence in hand without feeling cumbersome. The overall design embraces Nothing’s industrial DNA, complete with visible screws and bold colours like orange and blue, making it far more expressive than the average budget phone. The display is a 6.8-inch AMOLED panel with a Full HD+ resolution and a 120Hz refresh rate, offering smooth navigation and pleasing visual sharpness. Colours appear rich, blacks are deep, and content consumption is enjoyable for the most part. The screen peaks at around 1,200 nits of brightness, which is acceptable indoors and in shaded outdoor environments, though visibility suffers under direct sunlight. It’s a flat panel with slim bezels, and while it doesn’t push the limits of display technology, it delivers an enjoyable viewing experience that comfortably exceeds expectations for the price. Performance is handled by the MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Pro, built on a 4-nanometre process and paired with 8GB of RAM and 256GB of internal storage. This configuration provides responsive multitasking, smooth UI navigation, and reliable day-to-day usage. Apps load quickly, and switching between them is fluid. Light gaming is also possible, though graphically demanding titles will show the chipset’s limitations. The inclusion of 256GB of onboard storage is a standout feature at this price point, and the microSD slot offers welcome flexibility for users needing additional space. In everyday scenarios, the phone feels quick and consistent, which reflects well on both the chipset and the lightweight software. On the software front, the CMF Phone 2 Pro runs Nothing OS 3.2 on top of Android 15. The user interface is stripped back and highly cohesive, mirroring the minimalist ethos of Nothing’s mainline devices. There is very little bloatware, transitions are clean, and the experience is intuitive even for less tech-savvy users. The Essential Space, accessible via the physical Essential Key, introduces a small layer of AI functionality for quick reminders and voice memos. While the AI features feel more experimental than essential, the inclusion of a dedicated button for shortcuts is genuinely practical. Software support is also commendable, with three years of Android updates and four years of security patches promised. The camera system consists of a 50-megapixel main sensor, an ultrawide lens, and a macro sensor. In well-lit conditions, the main camera captures respectable photos with decent colour balance and acceptable dynamic range. Portraits are handled fairly well, particularly using the camera’s multi-level focal distance modes, which simulate optical zoom. However, results in low light are far less impressive, with visible noise, reduced detail, and a general lack of clarity. The ultrawide sensor also falls short, producing images that lack sharpness and contrast, even in daylight. As is often the case, the macro sensor adds little value. Video recording reaches up to 4K at 30fps, and stabilisation is passable, but nothing more. On the front, a 16-megapixel selfie camera delivers competent results under good lighting, though it struggles with edge detection in portrait mode and tends to soften details. One of the strongest elements of the CMF Phone 2 Pro is its battery life. With a 5,000mAh cell and efficient chipset, the phone consistently delivers excellent endurance. Charging is supported at 33 watts, delivering a 50% top-up in just over 30 minutes, according to the brand, although no charger is included in the box, which might disappoint some users. Audio performance is one of the phone’s weaker aspects. The mono speaker sounds metallic and lacks depth, particularly when playing music or video content. While it gets loud enough for calls or podcasts, the overall sound quality is underwhelming. Haptics, however, are surprisingly refined, with subtle vibration feedback that elevates the user experience. The fingerprint scanner is positioned on the side of the device and performs reliably, though its placement may be slightly awkward for users with larger hands. In terms of connectivity, the CMF Phone 2 Pro includes all the expected essentials, such as dual-band Wi-Fi, Bluetooth 5.3, USB-C, and 5G support. The hybrid SIM slot allows for either dual SIM usage or microSD expansion, adding a layer of flexibility. The phone focuses its strengths where they matter most: daily usability, storage, battery life, and overall smoothness. Ultimately, the CMF Phone 2 Pro succeeds by not overpromising. It doesn’t aim to challenge premium flagships, nor does it chase gimmicks. Instead, it focuses on offering a visually distinctive, well-performing, and affordable handset with a large battery and generous storage. While compromises exist, particularly in the audio and camera departments, they are balanced by its thoughtful software, efficient battery management, and the kind of design flair rarely seen at this price point. For users who want a practical, fun, and fuss-free smartphone experience with a bit of personality, the CMF Phone 2 Pro is a worthy contender. Pros Cons Eye-catching, customisable design with modular back accessories Mono speaker delivers flat, metallic audio Large 6.8-inch AMOLED display with 120Hz refresh rate Camera system underperforms in low light and with ultrawide shots 5,000mAh battery delivers excellent real-world endurance Always-On Display and Essential Key AI functions feel undercooked 256GB storage as standard, with microSD card support Screen visibility struggles under direct sunlight Smooth performance for daily tasks thanks to Dimensity 7300 Pro Charging limited to 33W (as per brand) and no charger included Clean, bloat-free software (Nothing OS 3.2 based on Android 15) No wireless charging, or stereo speakers Useful Essential Key for quick access to shortcuts and notes Some software features feel unfinished or inconsistently polished Promised 3 years of Android updates and 4 years of security patches Not suited for heavy social media or camera use Reliable side-mounted fingerprint scanner and refined haptics   ViserMark Labels for the Nothing CMF Phone 2 Pro Please take a look at the following information about the battery performance of the Nothing CMF Phone 2 Pro : Battery Life: The Nothing CMF Phone 2 Pro impresses with a battery life of up to 55 hours of active use, placing it firmly at the top of the mid-range segment in terms of endurance. This translates to approximately 2 full days of real-world usage for most users, even with moderate streaming, browsing, and social media activity. The 5000mAh battery, combined with the Dimensity 7300 Pro chipset and a clean software layer, delivers efficient power management across typical daily tasks. Whether you're navigating with GPS, watching long videos, or juggling multiple apps, the phone maintains consistent stamina without sudden drops. Battery Charging: According to the brand, the CMF Phone 2 Pro supports 33W wired charging, with a claimed 50% top-up in just over 30 minutes. In real-world use with a compatible USB PD charger, speeds are decent but not game-changing. A full charge typically takes around 1 hour and 50 minutes, making it adequate for overnight charging or quick top-ups before heading out. Battery Performance & Efficiency: The CMF Phone 2 Pro demonstrates excellent power management with an annual energy consumption of just 2.9 kWh, making it one of the more energy-efficient devices in its category. Its battery efficiency rating of 1.5 “leaves” is a very strong result, reflecting a well-optimised balance between performance and power draw. Thanks to this refined efficiency, the CMF Phone 2 Pro delivers dependable endurance without sacrificing fluidity or responsiveness, ideal for users who prioritise all-day use with minimal recharging needs. Specification Overview  - Released Date: April 2025 Body & Build: Dimensions: 164 x 78 x 7.8 mm Weight: 185g Materials: Plastic frame, Panda Glass front (Mohs level 5) with a removable back cover Durability: IP54-rated – protected from limited dust ingress and water splashes (up to 25cm depth for 20 minutes) Design: Lightweight and visually striking, available in bold colour options with a textured rear panel. The user-replaceable back is a rare and welcome feature in 2025, adding to its long-term practicality. Display: Size: 6.77-inch AMOLED Resolution: 2392 x 1080 (FHD+), ~388 ppi Refresh Rate: 120Hz (non-adaptive) Brightness: 3000 nits peak (measured 1255 nits in real-world use) HDR Support: HDR10+ and Ultra HDR certified Protection: Panda Glass (Mohs 5) Operating System: OS: Android 15 with Nothing OS 3.2 Software Support: Up to 3 major Android upgrades (brand policy) Chipset & Performance: Processor: MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Pro (4nm) CPU: Octa-core (4x Cortex-A78 @ 2.5GHz + 4x Cortex-A55 @ 2.0GHz) GPU: Mali-G615 MC2 Memory & Storage: Configurations: 128GB + 8GB RAM 256GB + 8GB RAM Expandable Storage: microSDXC slot (dedicated) Storage Technology: eMMC 5.1 (not UFS 3.x) Connectivity & Features: 5G: Supported (Sub-6 GHz) SIM: Dual Nano-SIM Wi-Fi: Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax), dual-band Bluetooth: 5.3 NFC: Market-dependent USB-C: Type-C Biometrics: Optical in-display fingerprint sensor Other Sensors: Accelerometer, gyroscope, proximity, compass Audio: Speakers: Single loudspeaker 3.5mm Jack: No Audio Quality: -27.0 LUFS Camera System: Rear Cameras: 50MP main (f/1.9, 1/1.57", 1.0µm, OIS, dual pixel PDAF) 50MP telephoto (f/1.9, 2x optical zoom) 8MP ultrawide (f/2.2, 120° FoV) Video Recording: Rear: 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps with gyro-EIS Front: 16MP, 1080p@30fps Colours Available: White, Black, Orange. Performance - HOW WE TEST ViserMark  offers a comprehensive range of battery performance test results based on different criteria and benchmarks for evaluating a smartphone's performance. Our tests are performed using the strictest protocol in a controlled environment to ensure repetition and consistency powered by SmartViser's test auto mation solution viSer . Translating technical specifications into consumer benefits with SmartViser VWS Analytics Studio  is a complementary product to the viSer Test Automation solution. It enhances the viSer user experience and is the fastest way to analyse and view smartphone test results. We have used the interactive dashboard to show you the recent test results and translated them into ViserMark Labels. Join our readers to receive the latest update to our smartphone battery performance scores and performance reviews as soon as we finish testing! Smartphone Battery Performance - FULL TEST RESULTS AND REVIEW ViserMark has put the Nothing CMF Phone 2 Pro through our testing protocol, based on real smartphone usage from 100% battery level down to power off. This includes daily activities, such as calls, web, video and music streaming, gaming, social networks, picture and video capture, and standby. All activities are executed in a defined order and timeline.   These test results, show how the Nothing CMF Phone 2 Pro performed and the scores achieved. 1. Battery Performance The CMF Phone 2 Pro  achieved a battery performance score of 50/100, positioning it well above the mid-tier average of 44.23, and outperforming both the Honor 200 Lite (46) and the Samsung Galaxy A26 (36). This result reflects not only solid battery life but also a well-calibrated balance between performance and power consumption, placing it among the better-optimised devices in its class. Charging is handled via 33W wired power delivery, with the brand claiming a 50% top-up in just over 30 minutes. However, no charger is included in the box, which may disappoint some buyers expecting a more complete out-of-the-box experience. There’s also support for 5W reverse wired charging, but no wireless charging. Overall, the CMF Phone 2 Pro stands out for its energy-to-performance efficiency. It’s a compelling option for users who value strong endurance and daily reliability without compromising on responsiveness or usability. 2. Battery Life In ViserMark’s battery life testing, the CMF Phone 2 Pro achieved 55 hours of active usage, translating to approximately 2 full days of typical real-world use. This result positions it at the top end of the mid-range bracket, slightly ahead of the Honor 200 Lite  (51 hours) and well above the Galaxy A26  (35 hours), confirming Nothing’s solid power management credentials. The strong result is a testament to the CMF Phone 2 Pro ’s effective synergy between its Dimensity 7300 Pro processor and the lightweight Nothing OS 3.2, which together ensure minimal background drain and smooth task handling. For users seeking reliable day-to-day endurance, the CMF Phone 2 Pro offers confident all-day use without anxiety over battery percentage. Its excellent battery life makes it an especially practical choice for those who value stamina without compromise. 3.   Battery Consumption The CMF Phone 2 Pro generally consumes more power than the Honor 200 Lite in categories such as social media, YouTube, downloads/uploads, and web browsing. These higher consumption levels suggest that the CMF model could be less finely tuned for sustained online activity and media streaming, especially in scenarios involving constant screen-on time or network usage. Interestingly, in gaming, the Honor 200 Lite draws more current than the CMF Phone 2 Pro , marking one of the few cases where the CMF device proves to be the more efficient option. This could be due to the way each phone handles GPU load and thermal management during graphically intensive sessions. Calls and media playback are nearly identical on both devices, indicating similarly optimised energy use during voice communication and offline video or music playback. Overall, while both phones perform competently in daily usage, the Honor 200 Lite maintains an edge in energy efficiency across most categories, with the exception of gaming. When comparing the Nothing CMF Phone 2 Pro with the Samsung Galaxy A26 in terms of battery consumption, the differences are notable across a range of everyday tasks. Both belong to the mid-tier segment, but their efficiency profiles reflect two distinct philosophies. The Galaxy A26 demonstrates considerably higher energy consumption in tasks such as social media, voice calls, downloads/uploads, and gaming. This suggests a less refined power management system, likely tied to the MediaTek Dimensity 6100+ chip and a software experience that prioritises responsiveness over longevity. The result: heavier battery drain during common usage, especially when multitasking or performing sustained activities. The CMF Phone 2 Pro consistently draws less current in these areas, offering a more efficient approach to power distribution. For users who frequently browse social media, play casual games, or make long calls, the CMF model is more likely to conserve energy and stay cooler over time. In video playback, media consumption, and web browsing, the CMF Phone 2 Pro also maintains a clear edge, consuming less battery across the board. These results suggest more aggressive background optimisation and possibly a more efficient display calibration. The only area where the A26 holds a slight advantage is camera usage, where its energy draw is marginally lower. However, this narrow win is not enough to shift the balance in its favour. In short, the Galaxy A26 may appeal to those seeking visual performance and speed, but the CMF Phone 2 Pro offers far better battery efficiency across nearly all real-world tasks,making it the more reliable choice for endurance-focused users. When comparing battery efficiency across the Nothing CMF Phone 2 Pro , Honor 200 Lite, Samsung Galaxy A26 and the Mid Tier average, one thing becomes clear: while all models deliver broadly similar battery life on paper, how they achieve those results varies significantly across real-world tasks. The Galaxy A26 draws the most power during active use, especially in social media, gaming, and call scenarios, burning through its 5,000mAh battery faster than rivals. Yet surprisingly, its overall endurance still holds up in testing, largely thanks to excellent idle management. This means the phone conserves energy well when on standby, apps are running in the background, or the screen is off, balancing out the high active consumption. The Honor 200 Lite stands out as the most consistent performer, showing efficient battery draw across nearly all workloads. It’s particularly well optimised for communication, download/upload and web browsing, a balance that makes it ideal for users who remain active on their devices throughout the day. Meanwhile, the CMF Phone 2 Pro proves remarkably energy-efficient in tasks like outgoing calls, media playback, and even gaming, where it draws noticeably less current than its main competitors. This makes it a strong option for users who spend a lot of time in these scenarios, as it balances solid performance with smart power use. To conclude, the Galaxy A26 compensates its heavy active usage with excellent standby efficiency. The Honor 200 Lite delivers the most balanced power management, especially during communication and browsing. Meanwhile, the CMF Phone 2 Pro stands out for its low consumption in high-demand tasks like gaming and media use, making it a practical choice for users who value endurance during everyday entertainment. 4.   Battery Efficiency In ViserMark’s battery efficiency evaluation, the Nothing CMF Phone 2 Pro achieved a solid 1.5-leaf rating, placing it at the top of its category alongside the Honor 200 Lite and well above the mid-tier average of 1.07 leaves. Its lean software, energy-conscious Dimensity 7300 Pro chipset, and practical hardware choices contribute to a usage profile that favours consistency and longevity. While it may not outperform flagship devices in raw specs, it stands out for delivering strong real-world battery behaviour in its price bracket. Unlike some rivals that rely on large batteries to compensate for poor optimisation, the CMF Phone 2 Pro delivers efficiency through smart power management. Combined with its balanced consumption across other workloads, the device manages to keep drain in check without compromising performance. 5.   Annual Energy Consumption According to ViserMark’s annual energy testing, the Nothing CMF Phone 2 Pro delivers an impressively low consumption of just 2.9 kWh per year, matching the highly efficient Honor 200 Lite and well below the mid-tier average of 3.63 kWh. This places it among the most power-conscious devices in its class. Such results highlight the CMF Phone 2 Pro ’s balanced engineering, combining practical hardware and a clean software experience to limit unnecessary drain across everyday use. Whether used actively or left in standby, the phone manages its power efficiently, making it a solid option for users prioritising energy-conscious tech. Its low annual energy footprint not only contributes to extended battery health but also translates into reduced long-term electricity costs, a meaningful benefit for environmentally and budget-aware consumers alike. Who Should Buy the Nothing CMF Phone 2 Pro ? The CMF Phone 2 Pro is a compelling choice for users who want standout design, clean software, and power efficiency, all wrapped in an affordable, feature-rich package. It’s especially suited for those who appreciate fluid day-to-day performance without needing flagship specs or gimmicks. With its eye-catching modular design, large AMOLED display, and smooth multitasking capabilities powered by the Dimensity 7300 Pro, this phone appeals to users looking for something a bit different, stylish, customisable, and practical. Its energy efficiency across gaming, calls and media playback also makes it ideal for users who engage in these tasks frequently and want longer-lasting performance throughout the day. Thanks to Nothing OS 3.2’s lightweight interface and extended update policy, the CMF Phone 2 Pro is a strong option for anyone seeking a clutter-free experience with long-term relevance. It’s particularly appealing for students, young professionals and casual users who want a phone that feels modern and reliable without breaking the bank. However, it may not fully satisfy photography enthusiasts or audiophiles, as its cameras and speaker system deliver mixed results. And while its modular back is a cool feature, the accessories may not be essential for everyone. In short, the CMF Phone 2 Pro is for users who value aesthetics, efficiency and a clean Android experience, those who want something functional, fun, and refreshingly different from the usual mid-range crowd. ViserMark VERDICT Using the Nothing CMF Phone 2 Pro is a refreshing experience that blends playful design with dependable day-to-day performance. For a budget-friendly device, it feels snappy and well-optimised, especially with 8GB of RAM handling tasks like web browsing, social media, messaging, and multitasking without breaking a sweat. The 6.7-inch AMOLED display is bright and fluid, with a smooth 120Hz refresh rate that elevates scrolling and swiping. The clean Nothing OS 3.2 interface enhances the experience, it’s lightweight, bloat-free, and simple to navigate, striking a nice balance between minimalism and functionality. Biometric unlocking is handled by an under-display fingerprint reader that’s accurate, though its low placement may feel awkward at first. Battery life is solid, comfortably lasting a full day of regular use, and the 33W fast charging gets you back up and running quickly, though again, there’s no charger in the box. Performance holds up well even under pressure. While it’s not built for hardcore gaming or professional multitasking, the Dimensity 7300 Pro chipset keeps things running smoothly for most users. The Essential Key and modular accessories add a layer of convenience and fun, though some features may still feel like work-in-progress. Overall, the CMF Phone 2 Pro delivers a lively, efficient and user-friendly experience. It’s a practical daily driver that doesn’t feel dull, combining smart design choices with enough power to keep pace with modern life. VCX (Valued Camera eXperience) The VCX Forum  has been working with its members on the system and infrastructure as a non-profit organisation. We strive to improve our technology to develop and exchange accurate and objective quality and performance indicators, which is our ultimate goal. We will also serve as a compass for the smartphone camera industry. We appreciate your interest in the VCX Forum. VCX Forum: No review Background Founded in October 2020 by Carl Pei, co‑founder of OnePlus, Nothing Technology Limited  (stylised as NOTHING ) is a   London ‑based consumer electronics company with a mission: to make technology “fun again” through distinctive design, transparent aesthetics, and clean software experiences. In August 2023, Nothing introduced the CMF by Nothing sub‑brand (CMF stands for Color, Material, Finish ) to broaden its accessible design-led product lineup. This brand is behind the CMF Phone 1, CMF Watch Pro, and eventually the CMF Phone 2 Pro, launched in April 2025 as an entry‑level smartphone with premium styling and long‑term software support. Written by Marcella Frattari   is the Communication Marketing and Lead Generation Manager at SmartViser, playing a key role in shaping the company's communication and marketing strategies. With a background in journalism and a passion for digital communication, Marcella focuses on improving SmartViser's overall online presence and engagement. Her dedication to clear, effective communication and creative content makes her a valuable asset to the team. Press Contact Marcella Frattari: Contact@visermark.com Our Resources ViserMark Scores ViserMark Reviews Success Stories Latest Articles Discover what ViserMark is all about. Read ViserMark's latest in-depth smartphone battery reviews. Discover our main success stories with Telecoms and other industries. Read more articles on our battery life, performance reviews, and test results. Know more Know more Know more Know more

SMARTPHONE TIER: MID TIER Battery Capacity mAh: 5000 Samsung Galaxy A26: Ideal for Basics, Less for Demanding Users SMARTPHONE BATTERY PERFORMANCE Based on Price: Mid Tier (€200-€499) Mid  Tier Ranking # 9 Learn more: Quick Summary ViserMark Labels Specifications Know the Test Results ViserMark Verdict Video Review - Soon Available The Samsung Galaxy A26 is a dependable and efficient mid-range smartphone that aims to strike the right balance between affordability, battery endurance, and a solid everyday experience. It stands out in its price category thanks to its combination of practical features, clean design, and Samsung’s strong software support, making it a suitable option for users who value stability and longevity over peak performance. Visually, the Galaxy A26 makes a strong impression with its 6.7-inch Super AMOLED display. The screen delivers a Full HD+ resolution of 1080 by 2340 pixels, with a sharp pixel density of approximately 385 ppi. The panel supports a 120Hz refresh rate, offering smooth scrolling and a pleasant visual fluidity in day-to-day interactions. Although brightness peaks at around 777 nits, which is acceptable but not outstanding, the AMOLED technology ensures deep contrast levels and vivid colour reproduction. The screen is protected by Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+, which offers added resistance to scratches and accidental knocks, placing it a step above the typical mid-tier standard. The A26 also features a surprisingly robust build for its class. It uses a glass front and back, both reinforced with Gorilla Glass Victus+, and a plastic frame. The phone is IP67 certified, meaning it is resistant to dust and can survive submersion in up to one metre of water for 30 minutes. Measuring 164 millimetres in height, 77.5 millimetres in width, and just 7.7 millimetres thick, the device feels slim and comfortable in the hand, despite its 200-gram weight. It is available in four colour options: Black, White, Mint, and Peach Pink, all of which follow Samsung’s recent trend of soft pastel tones. Under the hood, the Galaxy A26 is powered by two possible chipsets, depending on the market. The global variant includes the Exynos 1380, while the Latin American version features the Exynos 1280. Both are built on a 5-nanometre process, offering a balance of energy efficiency and decent processing power for general use. The CPU architecture includes Cortex-A78 and Cortex-A55 cores, suitable for running apps, browsing, streaming, and light multitasking. Graphics are handled by the Mali-G68 GPU, which performs well for casual gaming and video playback, though heavier 3D games will show the chipset's limitations. Memory configurations vary, starting at 4GB of RAM and ranging up to 8GB, paired with either 128GB or 256GB of internal storage. A microSDXC slot is available, though it uses the second SIM tray, so users will need to choose between dual-SIM functionality or expandable storage. In our testing, the 8GB RAM variant provided smooth navigation and held up well with multiple apps running in the background. Photography on the Galaxy A26 is driven by a triple camera setup. The main sensor is a 50-megapixel wide-angle lens with an f/1.8 aperture and optical image stabilisation, which helps produce stable images and reduces motion blur, particularly in low-light conditions. This is complemented by an 8-megapixel ultra-wide lens with a 120-degree field of view, and a 2-megapixel macro sensor. While the macro lens is more of a supporting element, the main and ultra-wide lenses perform adequately for casual photography. The phone also supports video recording at up to 4K resolution at 30 frames per second, with additional software stabilisation. On the front, a 13-megapixel camera captures well-lit selfies and is capable of recording 1080p video. Battery life is one of the Galaxy A26’s strongest assets. It houses a 5000mAh battery which, when combined with the efficiency of the Exynos chipset, delivers excellent real-world performance. Charging is supported at up to 25 watts via USB-C, which is reasonable for its price point, although no charger is included in the box. In terms of connectivity, the Galaxy A26 covers all essential bases. It supports 5G networks, Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac with dual-band capabilities, Bluetooth 5.3, and USB Type-C 2.0 with OTG support. GPS is reinforced with compatibility for Galileo, GLONASS, BDS, and QZSS systems. NFC is included in selected markets. The side-mounted fingerprint sensor is fast and reliable, and the phone retains a physical SIM tray that supports nano-SIMs. On the software side, the A26 runs Android 15 with Samsung’s One UI 7. It benefits from Samsung’s long-term software policy, which guarantees up to six major Android upgrades, keeping the device relevant for several years. The interface is clean and customisable, with useful features like Circle to Search and virtual proximity sensing enhancing the user experience. Overall, the Samsung Galaxy A26 brings together a thoughtful mix of modern hardware, excellent battery efficiency, and long-term software support. While it does not compete with flagship-level performance or imaging, it offers a polished and dependable experience that is ideal for users looking for a fuss-free daily driver with trusted build quality and Samsung’s ecosystem behind it. Pros Cons Vivid 6.7-inch Super AMOLED display with Full HD+ resolution and 120Hz refresh rate Performance can feel limited during gaming or intensive multitasking IP67-rated water and dust resistance Screen brightness is only average in direct sunlight Optical image stabilisation on the main 50MP camera Ultrawide and macro cameras offer basic results Up to 8GB RAM and microSDXC expansion Charging limited to 25W with no charger included Samsung’s long-term software support (up to 6 years) Plastic frame feels less premium than metal alternatives Gorilla Glass Victus+ protection on front and back Shared SIM tray limits dual SIM and storage expansion flexibility Dual SIM support and broad 5G compatibility No support for wireless charging or UFS 3.1+ storage speeds Clean, modern design with a solid in-hand feel Software occasionally shows stutters with heavy app loads Reliable side-mounted fingerprint sensor No power-saving features as advanced as those on higher-end Samsung models   ViserMark Labels for th e Samsung Galaxy A26 Please take a look at the following information about the battery performance of the Samsung Galaxy A26 : Battery Life: The Samsung Galaxy A26 delivers up to 35 hours of active use under balanced conditions, which translates to just over a day and a half for typical users. While not class-leading, it’s a respectable showing for a mid-tier device, especially given its 6.7-inch AMOLED screen and 5G connectivity. However, our real-world tests reveal that battery life can drop more rapidly when using mobile data, GPS navigation or the camera for extended periods. Streaming video and social media apps are also moderately power-hungry, so users who lean heavily on multimedia may need to recharge before the day ends. Battery Charging: The Galaxy A26 supports 25W wired charging, although no charger is included in the box. In our testing with a compatible USB PD 3.0 charger, a full charge took approximately 1 hour and 59 minutes, notably slower than Samsung's quoted figures and significantly behind many rivals in the same segment. There is no support for wireless charging, and the USB-C 2.0 port limits both data transfer speeds and charging flexibility. While the charging speed is tolerable for light users or overnight top-ups, it feels dated in 2025, especially when brands like Xiaomi and Motorola consistently offer 40W to 67W charging in devices at similar or lower price points. Battery Performance & Efficiency: Efficiency is where the Galaxy A26 reveals its mixed identity. In synthetic tests, its energy consumption ranks close to the Xperia 10 V, drawing more power per task than the Honor 200 Lite across nearly all usage scenarios, from social media to camera use. Web browsing and gaming, in particular, saw sharper battery drain compared to segment averages. Annual energy usage was calculated at 4.6 kWh, higher than ideal for a 5000mAh battery. While idle efficiency remains acceptable, its performance under load shows that Samsung’s software optimisations, while stable, fall short of competitors who have tuned their power draw more aggressively. Specification Overview  - Released Date: March 2025 Body & Build: Dimensions: 164 x 77.5 x 7.7 mm Weight: 200g Materials: Glass front and back (Gorilla Glass Victus+), plastic frame Durability: IP67-certified – water and dust resistant (up to 1m for 30 minutes) Design: Sturdy and symmetrical build with a minimalist aesthetic; slightly heavier than some mid-range competitors, but reassuring in hand Display: Size: 6.7-inch Super AMOLED Resolution: 2340 x 1080 (FHD+), ~385 ppi Refresh Rate: 120Hz (non-adaptive) Brightness: ~777 nits peak (measured) HDR Support: No HDR certification Protection: Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ Operating System: OS: Android 15 with One UI 7 Support: Up to 6 years of Android upgrades (Samsung policy as of 2025) Chipset & Performance: Global Variant: Processor: Exynos 1380 (5nm) CPU: Octa-core (4x Cortex-A78 @ 2.4GHz + 4x Cortex-A55 @ 2.0GHz) GPU: Mali-G68 MP5 LATAM Variant: Processor: Exynos 1280 (5nm) CPU: Octa-core (2x Cortex-A78 @ 2.4GHz + 6x Cortex-A55 @ 2.0GHz) GPU: Mali-G68 Memory & Storage: Configurations: 128GB + 4GB / 6GB / 8GB RAM 256GB + 6GB / 8GB RAM Expandable Storage: microSDXC (shared SIM slot) Storage Tech: UFS 2.2 (not UFS 4.0) Connectivity & Features: 5G: Supported (Sub-6 GHz) SIM: Dual Nano-SIM (no eSIM support) Wi-Fi: Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac), dual-band Bluetooth: 5.3 NFC: Available (market-dependent) USB-C: USB Type-C 2.0, OTG Biometrics: Side-mounted fingerprint reader Other Features: Circle to Search, virtual proximity sensor, compass, gyro, accelerometer Audio: Speakers: Single loudspeaker 3.5mm Jack: Not included Audio Quality: -27.1 LUFS Camera System: Rear Cameras: 50MP main (f/1.8, OIS, PDAF) 8MP ultrawide (f/2.2, 120˚ FoV) 2MP macro (f/2.4) Video: Up to 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, 720p@480fps (gyro-EIS) Front Camera: 13MP (f/2.2), 1080p@30fps video recording Colours Available: Black, White, & Mint. Performance - HOW WE TEST ViserMark  offers a comprehensive range of battery performance test results based on different criteria and benchmarks for evaluating a smartphone's performance. Our tests are performed using the strictest protocol in a controlled environment to ensure repetition and consistency powered by SmartViser's test auto mation solution viSer . Translating technical specifications into consumer benefits with SmartViser VWS Analytics Studio  is a complementary product to the viSer Test Automation solution. It enhances the viSer user experience and is the fastest way to analyse and view smartphone test results. We have used the interactive dashboard to show you the recent test results and translated them into ViserMark Labels. Join our readers to receive the latest update to our smartphone battery performance scores and performance reviews as soon as we finish testing! Smartphone Battery Performance - FULL TEST RESULTS AND REVIEW ViserMark has put the Samsung Galaxy A26 through our testing protocol, based on real smartphone usage from 100% battery level down to power off. This includes daily activities, such as calls, web, video and music streaming, gaming, social networks, picture and video capture, and standby. All activities are executed in a defined order and timeline.   These test results, show how the Samsung Galaxy A26 performed and the scores achieved. 1. Battery Performance The Samsung Galaxy A26 achieved a battery performance score of 36/100, positioning it below the mid-tier average of 43.95/100, and trailing both the Honor 200 Lite  (46) and the Sony Xperia 10 V 5G  (28). While it clearly outperforms the Xperia in overall stamina, it still falls short of matching the efficiency and endurance of the Honor device, which currently leads this trio. Charging is managed via 25W wired power delivery, but without a charger in the box. In real-world conditions, a full charge took 1 hour and 59 minutes using a certified USB PD charger, which is significantly slower than many direct competitors in the same price range. There is no support for wireless or reverse wireless charging. Overall, while the Galaxy A26 can handle most day-to-day operations, its energy-to-performance ratio is uncompetitive. High consumption rates across all categories raise questions about the efficiency of Samsung’s tuning on this model. Power users or even moderate multitaskers may find the experience underwhelming compared to better-optimised alternatives in the same segment. 2. Battery Life In ViserMark’s battery life testing, the Samsung Galaxy A26 reached 35 hours of active usage, which translates to around 1.5 days of typical real-world use. This result places it in line with many mid-tier smartphones, though it falls slightly behind top performers in this price range. Despite packing a relatively large 5,000mAh battery, the A26’s endurance does not fully reflect its capacity, likely due to less efficient power management from the MediaTek Dimensity 6100+ chip and software optimisation that lags behind rivals. In comparison, the Honor 200 Lite  delivered an impressive 51 hours, and even the Sony Xperia 10 V 5G , with a smaller battery, managed 33 hours, indicating better tuning and efficiency in those models. Still, the A26 provides sufficient day-to-day stamina for light to moderate users, particularly those who avoid intensive tasks like mobile gaming or frequent GPS use. Its strength lies in offering solid 5G performance and a clean UI, but power users or heavy streamers may find themselves needing to charge more often than expected for a phone with this battery size. 3.   Battery Consumption The Samsung Galaxy A26  and the Honor 200 Lite were analysed for battery consumption across various daily tasks using SmartViser's viSer and VWS Analytics Studio . The comparison highlighted differences in power usage for activities such as social media, calls, gaming, camera, and web browsing. In general, the Honor 200 Lite manages to deliver smoother and more balanced performance when it comes to energy consumption. During typical social media use and voice calls, the Galaxy A26 draws noticeably more power, suggesting that it isn’t as well-optimised for tasks requiring sustained connectivity or screen interaction. This is especially relevant for users who spend long periods browsing or using communication apps, as the A26 may run warmer and deplete the battery more quickly. When gaming, downloading content, or uploading files, the A26 again proves to be more power-hungry than its Honor counterpart. While it remains capable of handling these tasks, the higher energy draw could impact overall endurance in longer sessions or during multitasking. The only area where the Galaxy A26 holds a slight advantage is during camera use, where its power consumption is marginally better than that of the Honor 200 Lite . However, this alone isn’t enough to offset the broader efficiency gap between the two devices. In video playback, media consumption and web browsing, the A26 continues to consume more energy. For users who rely on their device throughout the day without frequent charging opportunities, this could become a noticeable drawback over time. In summary, while both phones offer a solid mid-range experience, the Honor 200 Lite is better tuned for day-to-day efficiency. It manages to stretch battery life more effectively across a wider range of tasks, giving it an edge for users focused on lasting performance. When comparing the Samsung Galaxy A26 with the Sony Xperia 10 V 5G in terms of battery consumption, the differences are notable across a range of everyday tasks. Both belong to the mid-tier segment, but their efficiency profiles reflect two distinct philosophies. The Galaxy A26 draws considerably more power during social media use, outgoing calls, and gaming. These are areas where screen-on time, connectivity, and system responsiveness come into play, suggesting that the A26 prioritises fluidity and visual performance at the expense of endurance. This is particularly evident during longer call sessions and continuous scrolling or engagement-heavy apps. In contrast, the Xperia 10 V 5G proves significantly more efficient in those same scenarios. Whether you're browsing social platforms, placing voice calls, or playing casual games, the Sony device maintains a lower battery drain, which can translate to longer uptime and fewer interruptions for charging. The A26 does manage to be slightly more efficient when using the camera, offering smoother capture sessions with less impact on battery life. However, in areas like YouTube streaming, media playback, and web browsing, the Xperia once again conserves energy more effectively, likely due to its lighter software and simpler visual output. Ultimately, the Galaxy A26 offers more visual punch and a snappier experience but at the cost of greater energy draw across most usage categories. Meanwhile, the  Xperia 10 V 5G   caters to users who prioritise longer sessions and efficient use, even if it comes with more modest hardware performance. When comparing battery efficiency across the Samsung Galaxy A26 , Honor 200 Lite , Sony Xperia 10 V 5G , and the Mid Tier average, one thing becomes clear: even if the overall performance scores are similar, the way each phone handles everyday tasks is quite different. That’s because these scores are not just about how much power is used during active use, but also how well the phone manages what’s happening in the background when not in use. Unlike its rivals, the Galaxy A26 performs surprisingly well when idle or in standby. It’s able to reduce power drain significantly when apps are open but inactive, or when the screen is off and the phone is on hold. This effective idle management helps compensate for the much higher battery usage during active tasks, pulling the overall battery score closer to its more efficient competitors. In contrast, both the Honor 200 Lite and Xperia 10 V 5G consume less power during individual tasks — they’re simply better tuned for low drain while interacting with apps. The Honor, in particular, is consistently efficient across all workloads, and the Xperia excels in communication and browsing, although it's a bit more demanding when using the camera. In short, the Galaxy A26 drains faster during actual use, but preserves energy well in between. That’s why, even though it burns through more power while you’re using it, it still ends up with a similar total battery score — especially for users with more passive or standby-heavy usage patterns. Still, those seeking better overall efficiency in day-to-day tasks might lean toward the Honor or Xperia instead. 4.   Battery Efficiency In ViserMark’s battery efficiency evaluation, the Samsung Galaxy A26 received a modest 0.5-leaf rating — the same as the Xperia 10 V 5G , and well below both the mid-tier average and the Honor 200 Lite , which leads this group with a 1.5-leaf score. This low efficiency score doesn’t stem from lack of battery capacity, as both the A26 and Xperia 10 V 5G carry 5,000mAh cells. Instead, it reflects how each phone manages its energy during day-to-day tasks. While the Galaxy A26 performs reasonably when idle, it consumes considerably more power during nearly every active use case, from social media to calls and gaming. This aggressive drain drags down its efficiency despite decent overall battery life. By contrast, the Honor 200 Lite strikes a much better balance. It uses less energy per task and demonstrates stronger background management, which translates into longer usage time and lower annual consumption. The Sony Xperia 10 V 5G , while also rated 0.5 leaves, shows slightly better control in communication and media tasks, though it still falls short of average expectations. In summary, the Galaxy A26 may offer solid endurance thanks to its standby performance, but when it comes to power efficiency in real use, it lags well behind the competition in its tier. 5.   Annual Energy Consumption According to ViserMark’s annual energy testing, the Samsung Galaxy A26 registers a consumption of 4.6 kWh per year, placing it well above both the mid-tier average (3.66 kWh) and the far more efficient Honor 200 Lite (2.9 kWh). Only the Sony Xperia 10 V 5G  fares worse, with a slightly higher figure of 4.9 kWh, the highest in this comparison. The  Honor 200 Lite  demonstrates a far more balanced approach, managing to keep power consumption low without sacrificing responsiveness. It uses nearly 40% less energy annually, which not only benefits battery longevity but also makes it the more sustainable and wallet-friendly option over time. While the Galaxy A26 may hold up in daily endurance thanks to its large 5,000mAh battery, its inefficient power management during real use limits its value for users seeking long-term energy savings. Who Should Buy the Samsung Galaxy A26? The Samsung Galaxy A26 is well-suited for users seeking a reliable, no-fuss smartphone that balances endurance, clean design and long-term support. It’s an ideal fit for those who prioritise battery longevity, simplicity and durability over bleeding-edge performance. With its large AMOLED screen, IP67 water resistance and Gorilla Glass Victus+ protection, it appeals to users who want solid hardware without overpaying. Its software longevity also makes it a smart choice for those who plan to hold onto their device for several years without worrying about outdated apps or features. Everyday users, especially those who focus on browsing, messaging, video streaming and light photography, will find the A26 dependable and familiar. Its efficiency during idle and standby makes it particularly appealing for people with passive use habits or those who don't constantly push their device. However, it’s less suitable for power users, gamers, or anyone who relies on demanding apps, frequent multitasking or extended sessions on mobile data and GPS. The A26’s energy consumption spikes under pressure, and its 25W charging—without a bundled adapter—can feel sluggish by 2025 standards. The Galaxy A26 is ultimately for users who value stability, battery life and Samsung’s trusted ecosystem in a mid-range package that gets the job done, quietly, reliably, and without unnecessary frills. ViserMark VERDICT The Samsung Galaxy   A26 - what's it like to use? Using the Galaxy A26 is a reminder that a mid-range phone can still feel smooth, sturdy, and thoughtfully built, so long as your expectations are realistic. Daily tasks like browsing, messaging, video streaming and social media run without hiccups, especially on the 8GB RAM variant. One UI 7 is clean and familiar, offering just enough customisation and smart features without overwhelming the user. The 6.7-inch Super AMOLED display adds a premium touch with vibrant colours and a 120Hz refresh rate, though its brightness can feel lacking under strong sunlight. The side-mounted fingerprint sensor is quick and reliable, and the phone’s IP67 rating adds peace of mind for everyday use. That said, the A26 starts to show its limits when pushed. Heavy multitasking, 3D gaming or frequent GPS use can cause occasional stutters and faster battery drain. Charging is also on the slower side at 25W, with no charger in the box, which may test the patience of more demanding users. Still, for light to moderate use, the Galaxy A26 feels dependable and efficient. It’s a practical daily companion wrapped in a sleek design, with long-term software support and solid hardware fundamentals that make it easy to live with. VCX (Valued Camera eXperience) The VCX Forum  has been working with its members on the system and infrastructure as a non-profit organisation. We strive to improve our technology to develop and exchange accurate and objective quality and performance indicators, which is our ultimate goal. We will also serve as a compass for the smartphone camera industry. We appreciate your interest in the VCX Forum. VCX Forum: No review Background The Samsung Group  is a South Korean multinational conglomerate headquartered in Samsung Town, Seoul. It comprises numerous affiliated businesses, most united under the Samsung brand. Samsung Electronics has assembly plants and sales networks in 74 countries and employs around 290,000 people. Samsung is a major manufacturer of electronic components such as lithium-ion batteries, semiconductors, image sensors, camera modules and displays for clients such as Apple, Sony, HTC and Nokia. Written by Marcella Frattari   is the Communication Marketing and Lead Generation Manager at SmartViser, playing a key role in shaping the company's communication and marketing strategies. With a background in journalism and a passion for digital communication, Marcella focuses on improving SmartViser's overall online presence and engagement. Her dedication to clear, effective communication and creative content makes her a valuable asset to the team. Press Contact Marcella Frattari: Contact@visermark.com Our Resources ViserMark Scores ViserMark Reviews Success Stories Latest Articles Discover what ViserMark is all about. Read ViserMark's latest in-depth smartphone battery reviews. Discover our main success stories with Telecoms and other industries. Read more articles on our battery life, performance reviews, and test results. Know more Know more Know more Know more